ECON/MGEC 333 Game Theory And Strategy Problem Set 9 Solutions. Levent Koçkesen January 6, 2011

Similar documents
EconS 424 Strategy and Game Theory. Homework #5 Answer Key

In reality; some cases of prisoner s dilemma end in cooperation. Game Theory Dr. F. Fatemi Page 219

Duopoly models Multistage games with observed actions Subgame perfect equilibrium Extensive form of a game Two-stage prisoner s dilemma

EconS 424 Strategy and Game Theory. Homework #5 Answer Key

Problem 3 Solutions. l 3 r, 1

Game Theory. Wolfgang Frimmel. Repeated Games

Repeated Games. September 3, Definitions: Discounting, Individual Rationality. Finitely Repeated Games. Infinitely Repeated Games

Early PD experiments

M.Phil. Game theory: Problem set II. These problems are designed for discussions in the classes of Week 8 of Michaelmas term. 1

Module 3: "Dynamic games of complete information" Lecture 23: "Bertrand Paradox in an Infinitely repeated game" The Lecture Contains:

1 Solutions to Homework 4

FDPE Microeconomics 3 Spring 2017 Pauli Murto TA: Tsz-Ning Wong (These solution hints are based on Julia Salmi s solution hints for Spring 2015.

Introduction to Game Theory Lecture Note 5: Repeated Games

Eco AS , J. Sandford, spring 2019 March 9, Midterm answers

Economics 209A Theory and Application of Non-Cooperative Games (Fall 2013) Repeated games OR 8 and 9, and FT 5

is the best response of firm 1 to the quantity chosen by firm 2. Firm 2 s problem: Max Π 2 = q 2 (a b(q 1 + q 2 )) cq 2

Chapter 8. Repeated Games. Strategies and payoffs for games played twice

Chapter 11: Dynamic Games and First and Second Movers

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications Final Exam Ronaldo Carpio Jan. 13, 2015

Econ 302 Assignment 3 Solution. a 2bQ c = 0, which is the monopolist s optimal quantity; the associated price is. P (Q) = a b

Simon Fraser University Spring 2014

Noncooperative Oligopoly

Prisoner s dilemma with T = 1

MKTG 555: Marketing Models

The Nash equilibrium of the stage game is (D, R), giving payoffs (0, 0). Consider the trigger strategies:

Answer Key: Problem Set 4

Econ 323 Microeconomic Theory. Practice Exam 2 with Solutions

In the Name of God. Sharif University of Technology. Graduate School of Management and Economics

Econ 323 Microeconomic Theory. Chapter 10, Question 1

Elements of Economic Analysis II Lecture XI: Oligopoly: Cournot and Bertrand Competition

Game Theory. Important Instructions

Warm Up Finitely Repeated Games Infinitely Repeated Games Bayesian Games. Repeated Games

Repeated Games. Econ 400. University of Notre Dame. Econ 400 (ND) Repeated Games 1 / 48

Not 0,4 2,1. i. Show there is a perfect Bayesian equilibrium where player A chooses to play, player A chooses L, and player B chooses L.

Economics 431 Infinitely repeated games

Economics and Computation

Solution to Assignment 3

EC 202. Lecture notes 14 Oligopoly I. George Symeonidis

CHAPTER 14: REPEATED PRISONER S DILEMMA

Repeated Games. EC202 Lectures IX & X. Francesco Nava. January London School of Economics. Nava (LSE) EC202 Lectures IX & X Jan / 16

Strategic Production Game 1

1 Solutions to Homework 3

Repeated, Stochastic and Bayesian Games

ECE 586BH: Problem Set 5: Problems and Solutions Multistage games, including repeated games, with observed moves

Economics 171: Final Exam

Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.

HE+ Economics Nash Equilibrium

13.1 Infinitely Repeated Cournot Oligopoly

ECON402: Practice Final Exam Solutions

SI Game Theory, Fall 2008

Discounted Stochastic Games with Voluntary Transfers

Games of Incomplete Information ( 資訊不全賽局 ) Games of Incomplete Information

G5212: Game Theory. Mark Dean. Spring 2017

Game Theory - Lecture #8

LECTURE 4: MULTIAGENT INTERACTIONS

G5212: Game Theory. Mark Dean. Spring 2017

ECONS 424 STRATEGY AND GAME THEORY MIDTERM EXAM #2 ANSWER KEY

Introduction to Industrial Organization Professor: Caixia Shen Fall 2014 Lecture Note 5 Games and Strategy (Ch. 4)

Relative Performance and Stability of Collusive Behavior

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 9

Exercises Solutions: Oligopoly

Game Theory with Applications to Finance and Marketing, I

PRISONER S DILEMMA. Example from P-R p. 455; also 476-7, Price-setting (Bertrand) duopoly Demand functions

Solution Problem Set 2

Repeated Games with Perfect Monitoring

Economics 101A (Lecture 21) Stefano DellaVigna

Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions Exam date: June 5, 2017

Repeated games. Felix Munoz-Garcia. Strategy and Game Theory - Washington State University

Answers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average)

IMPERFECT COMPETITION AND TRADE POLICY

Game Theory I 1 / 38

Static Games and Cournot. Competition

Game Theory I 1 / 38

AS/ECON 2350 S2 N Answers to Mid term Exam July time : 1 hour. Do all 4 questions. All count equally.

Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.

ECO410H: Practice Questions 2 SOLUTIONS

Dynamic Games. Econ 400. University of Notre Dame. Econ 400 (ND) Dynamic Games 1 / 18

Economics 101A (Lecture 21) Stefano DellaVigna

CS711: Introduction to Game Theory and Mechanism Design

Math 152: Applicable Mathematics and Computing

Strategy -1- Strategy

GS/ECON 5010 Answers to Assignment 3 November 2005

ECON106P: Pricing and Strategy

Name. Answers Discussion Final Exam, Econ 171, March, 2012

Noncooperative Market Games in Normal Form

Discuss difference between game theory and price theory (no interactions between individuals in price theory)

DUOPOLY. MICROECONOMICS Principles and Analysis Frank Cowell. July 2017 Frank Cowell: Duopoly. Almost essential Monopoly

Solutions to Homework 3

MA300.2 Game Theory 2005, LSE

Spring 2017 Final Exam

Game Theory Fall 2003

Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions

Player 2 L R M H a,a 7,1 5,0 T 0,5 5,3 6,6

University of Hong Kong ECON6036 Stephen Chiu. Extensive Games with Perfect Information II. Outline

14.12 Game Theory Midterm II 11/15/ Compute all the subgame perfect equilibria in pure strategies for the following game:

1. Monetary credibility problems. 2. In ation and discretionary monetary policy. 3. Reputational solution to credibility problems

Game Theory Lecture #16

Name: Midterm #1 EconS 425 (February 20 th, 2015)

The Ohio State University Department of Economics Econ 601 Prof. James Peck Extra Practice Problems Answers (for final)

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Game Theory (EMBA 296 & EWMBA 211) Summer 2016

Transcription:

Koç University Department of Economics ECON/MGEC 333 Game Theory And Strategy Problem Set Solutions Levent Koçkesen January 6, 2011 1. (a) Tit-For-Tat: The behavior of a player who adopts this strategy depends only on the last period s outcome. Therefore, we can group all the histories into those with the last period s outcome being (C,C),(C,D),(D,C), or (D,D). We have to test optimality of the strategy after all such histories using the one-shot-deviation property. We will check optimality from the perspective of player 1, which is without any loss of generality since the game is symmetric. whose normalized discounted sum is 2. 3 0 3 0 whose normalized discounted sum is 3/(1 + δ). Optimality requires or ii. Histories that end with (C, D) whose normalized discounted sum is 3/(1 + δ). 2 3 1+δ δ 1 2 3 0 3 0 whose normalized discounted sum is 2. Optimality requires iii. Histories that end with (D, C) δ 1 2 whose normalized discounted sum is 3δ/(1 + δ). 0 3 0 3 whose normalized discounted sum is 1. Optimality requires 3δ/(1+δ) 1 δ 1 2 1

iv. Histories that end with (D, D) whose normalized discounted sum is 1. 0 3 0 3 whose normalized discounted sum is 3δ/(1 + δ). Optimality requires 3δ/(1+δ) 1 δ 1 2 Therefore, this strategy profile is a SPE if and only if δ = 1/2. (b) Pavlov: There are three type of histories: (i) Those that end with (C,C); (ii) Those that end with (D, D); (iii) All other histories. 2. (a) Tit-For-Tat: whose normalized discounted sum is 2. whose normalized discounted sum is Optimality requires 3 1 2 2 (1 δ)(3+δ + 2δ2 ) = 3 2δ +δ2 1 δ 3 2δ +δ 2 2 (δ 1) 2 0 which is impossible. Therefore, this strategy profile is not a SPE. whose normalized discounted sum is. 6 0 6 0 whose normalized discounted sum is 6/(1 + δ). Optimality requires or 6 1+δ δ 1 2 2

ii. Histories that end with (C, D) whose normalized discounted sum is 6/(1 + δ). 6 0 6 0 whose normalized discounted sum is. Optimality requires iii. Histories that end with (D, C) δ 1 2 whose normalized discounted sum is 6δ/(1 + δ). 0 6 0 6 whose normalized discounted sum is 1. Optimality requires iv. Histories that end with (D, D) whose normalized discounted sum is 1. 6δ/(1+δ) 1 δ 1 5 0 6 0 6 whose normalized discounted sum is 6δ/(1 + δ). Optimality requires 6δ/(1+δ) 1 δ 1 5 Therefore, there is no δ that satisfies all these conditions and hence this strategy profile is not a SPE. (b) Pavlov: There are three type of histories: (i) Those that end with (C,C); (ii) Those that end with (D, D); (iii) All other histories. 6 1 Payoffs are the same starting with third period. Therefore, optimality requires +δ 6+δ, or δ 2/3. 3

ii. Histories that end with (D, D) 6 1 Payoffs are the same starting with third period. Therefore, optimality requires +δ 6+δ, or δ 2/3. iii. All other histories (D,D) (C,C) (C,C) (C,C) 1 (C,D) (D,D) (C,C) (C,C) 0 1 OSD is not profitable after any such history. Therefore, we conclude that this strategy profile is a SPE if and only if δ 2/3. 3. In the the unique Nash equilibrium of the one-shot Cournot game firms produce Q c = a c 3 and their payoffs are Half the monopoly output is Q m = a c with payoff There are two categories of histories that are relevant for the grim-trigger strategy: (a) Histories in which both firms have always produced half the monopoly output Grim-trigger leads to average discounted payoff of We have to check against all possible one-shot deviations. However, checking against the best OSD is enough. The best deviation is the output level Q 1 that maximizes ( a c Q 1 c)q 1 since the other firm is producing (a c)/ and after a deviation each firm is going to produce Q c forever. This maximizer is given by Q d = 3(a c) with corresponding one-period payoff of ( a c 3(a c) Corresponding average discounted payoff is (1 δ)( (a c)2 6 Therefore, we need +δ (a c)2 +δ 2(a c)2 c) 3(a c) = (a c)2 6 + ) = (1 δ) ( 6 + δ (1 δ) ) (1 δ) ( 6 + δ (1 δ) ) δ 17

(b) All other histories After such histories, firm 2 always produces the Cournot output, to which producing the Cournot output every period is a best response. Therefore, this strategy profile is a SPE if and only if δ 17. 5