Kane County Transportation Planning Area Study. Sugar Grove, Aurora, Montgomery Planning Area Transportation Improvement Plan

Similar documents
KANE COUNTY 2030 TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Chapter 6: Financial Resources

Hot Springs Bypass Extension TIGER 2017 Application. Benefit-Cost Analysis Methodology Summary

MINNESOTA. Jurisdictional Realignment Project Phase 1 Report

Planning Board Worksession No.6: Transportation and Staging

Development of the Cost Feasible Plan

BRISTOL TENNESSEE / VIRGINIA URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

GLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.

LAKE~SUMTER MPO - COST FEASIBLE PROJECTS

Appendix G TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL DOCUMENTATION

PLEASANT GROVE, UTAH TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN AND ANALYSIS

STATUS In Progress - Programmed FEDERAL Local Fund $0 $0 $0 $13,041 $13, TAP CL STBG $0 $0 $0 $247,789 $247,789

JACKSON METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)

MnDOT Highway Construction Outlook

TAX INCREMENTAL PROJECT PLAN

How to Read the Project Modification Listings - Roadway Section

Tampa Bay Express Planning Level Traffic and Revenue (T&R) Study

Planning Board Worksession No.1-Transportation and Staging

Attachment B. Project Cost Estimates. Ridge Road Extension Alternatives Analysis

STAUNTON-AUGUSTA-WAYNESBORO METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

GRASS VALLEY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE PROGRAM NEXUS STUDY

COUNTY COUNCIL FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND

Columbia River Crossing Project Vancouver, Washington Engineering (Rating Assigned November 2012)

ESTIMATED EFFECTIVE PROPERTY TAX RATES : Selected Municipalities in Northeastern Illinois

Corridors of Commerce DRAFT Scoring and Prioritization Process. Patrick Weidemann Director of Capital Planning and Programming November 1, 2017

Financial Capacity Analysis

Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan

ALL Counties. ALL Districts

Planning Board Roundtable 12/3/15

Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions

TUMF TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE NEXUS REPORT

Market and Fiscal Impact Analysis of the Phase 2 Metrorail Extension to Loudoun County. Loudoun County April 19, 2011

ABSTRACT OF VOTES in Kane County, Illinois at the General Primary on March 20th, 2018

FY Statewide Capital Investment Strategy... asset management, performance-based strategic direction

Budget Performance in Millions of Dollars Favorable/Unfavorable to Budget. Suburban Suburban

Glossary Candidate Roadway Project Evaluation Form Project Scoring Sheet... 17

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines Methodology

Fiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2011

ORLANDO-ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY Traffic Volumes At Mainline Toll Plazas Existing System

ESTIMATED EFFECTIVE PROPERTY TAX RATES : Selected Municipalities in Northeastern Illinois

University Link LRT Extension

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE DRAFT MINUTES Thursday, October 23, :00 a.m. NWMC Offices 1616 East Golf Road Des Plaines, IL 60016

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Existing Conditions/Studies

2012 Budget Analysis. (Unaudited) Quarterly Financial Review

2012 Ballot Initiatives Report

Route Route Z Intersection Realignment

Table 2.7 I-73 Economic Impact Summary in Value Change (Alternatives compared to No-Build)

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Pasco County, Florida. Multi-Modal Mobility Fee 2018 Update Study

MPO Staff Report MPO EXECUTIVE BOARD: August 16, 2017

MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION

Fiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2017

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

TYSONS CORNER. Neighborhood Traffic Impact Study. Traffic Analysis Report. Task Order No Prepared by: Prepared for:

Subdivision Staging Policy (SSP) By Dan Wilhelm, As of 11/15/2016

HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Chapter 6 Transportation Improvements & Financial Plan

I-44/US-75 Interchange and Related Improvements on I-44 in Tulsa County

Transportation Improvement Program

Transportation Planning FAQ s

TESTIMONY. The Texas Transportation Challenge. Testimony Before the Study Commission on Transportation Financing

STAFF REPORT. PURPOSE OF REPORT: Information only Discussion Commission Action

Lake County. Government Finance Study. Supplemental Material by Geography. Prepared by the Indiana Business Research Center

75.00 Traffic Generation Assessment and Trust Funds

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

Capital Investment Program (CIP) About CIP

Okaloosa-Walton 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Amendment

ARTICLE 12 TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

ESTIMATED EFFECTIVE PROPERTY TAX RATES : Selected Municipalities in Northeastern Illinois

MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION

2018 Budget Analysis. (Preliminary and Unaudited) Quarterly Financial Review

FY19 Budget - Discussion. April 2018

Indiana LTAP Road School 2007 Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana March 7, 2007

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Figure 1-1: SR 156 Study Area & Monterey Expressway Alignment

Reston Transportation Funding Plan

RECOMMENDATION TO THE DULLES CORRIDOR AND FINANCE COMMITTEES

Project Summary Project Name: Route 37 Corridor Safety Sweep Project Number:

Michigan City Urbanized Area & Non-Urban LaPorte County Changes

final 2006 ½ Cent Transportation Sales Tax Measure EXPENDITURE Plan (Amended)

City of Portsmouth Portsmouth, New Hampshire Department of Public Works

System Development Charge Methodology

MOBILITY FEES IN PASCO COUNTY

Countywide Dialogue on Transportation

Economic Impacts of Road Project Timing Shifts in Sarasota County

Lake County. Government Finance Study. Supplemental Material by Geography. Prepared by the Indiana Business Research Center

House Bill 20 Implementation. House Select Committee on Transportation Planning Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 1:00 P.M. Capitol Extension E2.

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN THE PORTLAND METRO REGION

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

YEAR 2035 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN: FISCALLY CONSTRAINED ESTIMATED COSTS AND ATTENDANT REVENUES

Removed Projects TR th Way SE (Snake Hill) Improvements o Will be completed in TR th Ave SE Gap Project

Board of Directors. John J. Case, Chairman. Terrance M. Carr, Director West Central Suburban Cook County

Chapter 4: Plan Implementation

2004 Operating and Capital Program Financial Plan for Operations, and Capital Plan

125 EAST 11TH STREET, AUSTIN, TEXAS TxDOT DISCLAIMER

Report Accompanying the Diamond Lake Urban Renewal Plan

Transcription:

Kane County Transportation Planning Area Study Sugar Grove, Aurora, Montgomery Planning Area Transportation Improvement Plan April 24

Submitted to: April 24 Submitted by:

! "! " #$%! & ' & # ()* +!, -.$ - )! / 1 2$.$ 3., 3, 4. 2$..$,.$,. " " )! // + 1 +.%556 # 3 3 ), 3, 4

!! $ 1 *.$, %'1-1 *, * %'1 7 ", * 7 & '1.$, +! & - ')8 & 1 ', ' 3 ' $ *, 9: 4.%556 # 3 % % '%' " ; & ; + %!)' /44577 - *77.$' 1 3 4., 7! <, 1 ) =%$ ).' " 2$. &..$ +.! < -, ' & ' %'1 1. ' ; '&($.

, ()777/%;! =1=,>>) $% %!%* $%?/ $ / % $% %!%; $! $) %9: % %%%!% $ %!%)%% %'#// 1 9'1:!% ) $ / / % / )< / / ; %%$/ ) / 5!% ++7 %%$ % $ %%$/ %@'%%$/%%$/ )"7 %%$; )1 )/$/) $ )< % %%$ $ %A9:/9: / 9":1 B%1!9B1!:/B%=! 9B=!:/ B%=9B=:, % %%$ % / /$%% 5C % /$ %)9 +7 : 9 ++ :!% >'9>(': 2 @ / & %5 ; $ ) >('// C $*) $ %C $ %%%!% % $ $ ) *$% ; $ "/777 447++/777 77 &/777/777 % $ ) ) 9!D: % 1 Development and Calibration of Kane County Transportation Systems Planning Model, CH2M HILL (May 2) 2 See page 16 of Existing Transportation Conditions and Forecasts of Future Travel Demand, CH2M HILL (May 21) for an explanation of LOS.

!! #$%$%%%$ %) 77!%$%$% 44 77 9!: $% % $%$)'#/6# <6/ / 6 @!%77)$% $ )% %%$ * $ $ 44 77/B1!$% % $)4" /B=!)7+ / B=)+7 /) 77/ %/$% /+- % %%$ $% % $) $%*& 44!% % % $% ) %9:!% %$A B1! / B=! / B= / % / 5 %$ %% A / 5 / 5 '!%# $% %) %%%/ / %'#//1 % 5 % % ; / % 91 77:!% ; $ % 5 % > " & + ' % % /% %$ )!% /) $ %!%/ $ )) % % ) $ % % %%!% % 5 $) %

!! % 5 $) % $% ) % % 5 )%) %!%6 @%!% '#//1 /$%%%)*% %/%) % $$%6@ % %/9877:! "! # /%C ) %'#// 1 9'1: % 7/ 9 : * %,>&)$ @'"7./,>& @'"7/ (%. %.,533 %('/ (%. @'"78%., $% ) / % / % %$) $!% % %* $ )$ % )%2%, 92,: *!% ) $ ) % $ %2,77) 9!D:6% % ) %%/ $ $!% $+ $5 / " 5 @ %#%, ' 9#,':% 9 :/ /% ) ) % $ )<) C ) C % ) )C 7+ %C % C $) ) 7+ ) C!%$% ) )7& %), % %'1 %2,$ % % $ / ) % $, / $ %)!D$% * $ %2, %$ " "

!! % / $ %%4/--7%%$ %'1 / -/377 % %, /% $ )&37$ % *! % $%'1 /%!D$ $!D!%$% %!D% $ %C!D$ C!D/% C!% %!D$ % C )%!D %* % %'1 $% /!$ %'1 %1 6 )! $ %'% )%,!!% % $) )%$%% $) %!% ) % $ % % %% $% $% ; % / $% % % ; $!% * ; / B1 /B($/ @ E!% ; % * $ $% % ))' $ / % )$)! C /% )) /$ % % $ % ;!% ) $ % %.$ )C $% $%!%$ /%$/ % ) $ %.9'&: $ % #! +%$$%)$ 44 77 %'1!% $ %,!$9,533:/% % $%,> +-(%%%$ ) $% $) (%. %,533/../,>+-)$ @'"7,533/,>&<@'"7/(%.%,533/,>& %% % $%,533!! %'1 977: $ $ % $ ' $ % %%$9 $:

!! % %9&+ : %%F B1!9+ :/ B=9-3 : %'1 " % ) + %B1! - %B=!% $% >('$$) & $!% %$ $$) & %$% % -%$$ >('9 :! # "! "! & ' ( $$)% %'1!%$ % $$) )* ()*$)% %!% C$ % $%%)*, /%$/%)*$ $ $% $%%% )*/ $/ $ )% %'1A '(%% ) %% 9B=:!% B= $) 5 )%C 5 % ) % 5 )*, $ )) / %% %!% $ %* $!% % )* $) % $ *!% $C %!$ $ % %'1A %$ $ / // / ' $ %%/ /%/ %)%!% %)

!! % *> %'1 %$ % % %) %)% ) )$ * 3 %$ % ) % $% %'1 % $% %*, % % /%) % $% % # "! "! ) $!% $ %'1/ % %) $/$) % $ ; 77! %! ' 9!': 77.! 9.!:/ '%%7"7G%! 7"7.! B1 77 %! 43& % @ B B'# %! '#B, % ).G,.+-=.!% * $ $$ $$!%$ (%.$ * % % +1 * $ %'1!) # * + #$ % % & ' $ () *) $ ' + $, -. *) / & - & % 1 2% 3 & *& $ Roadway Improvement Limits U.S. 3 Widening to 4 Lanes IL 47 to IL 31 U.S. 3/IL 47 Widening to 4 Lanes Base Line Road to current 4-lane section IL 47 Widening to 4 Lanes Current 4-lane section to Main Street Galena Boulevard Widening to 4 Lanes IL 47 to Orchard Road I-88/IL 47 Interchange IL 56/Hankes Road Interchange Interchange Completion New Partial Interchange Gordon Road New Construction/Widening to 4 Lanes U.S. 3 to Galena Boulevard

!! ' % $) % '1 $$/ /%) $ %)% 4%$% $ %'1 ' # ; (! % % %F /)/!%; 77! 1 %'1 % 2% <'.> $% $ (%. '#!%; <;. )'/% %!'7"7.! % % 2% <' ($$% 1 @'"7/ %' ),>+- (%. 2$)< %'1 $ %; 7% /)/ "!!% %'1 $ % )%!%) %)$) / / / % /) %/ ' $ % % $ % %)*% $ C A %% /$% / >('/ ) )!$% $CA %$ / % $!$ %%9B=: $ % $ % ) %C /) %!% >(' %$% $ % %!% $% % ) >('// $% $% 73/ 7/ /!% 5 >(' %$%$ ( / $ % $ >('>('!%% $ %$% / ) $) $% % >(' 4

!! % $ ) / %% % % % %% $ '%%% $!%) ) $ % B1!) C % ) %%%$ / % F)*% /% $% %%$!% * % $) $%%% %) )/$ /$ % %,$) % %, $ ) $ 2$$ %)%%% 2$ % $% % ) $)% / % )! "! )$) $$) %!% $) % / %) % ) % $ ) $% %/% $ % %) %%$ 6% 5) $/ $! %% %%% / % % %$!% $$%% 9 % :/$% C,$ %% $) $$ %%, % $ / % $ %) 5 * -) # " -; 5) % $ %! / $) % %% > $) %/)% % % %,$ %%%$$ ) $% %% /% % $ ) 5

!!!%H I $ ) % %5 /$ ) % $ % $, / $$ % * $ %!% 77 ) $ % % 5) $ $ % % % $%!% $ % % %) %! -!% 5) $ ) 5 $ %%%/)% $ % 5$B= $) &B=< %) "B=< % 5)!% $% $ & "-!% 5) $ )% / ) )%!% $ +& % F 5 $!%$7 B1! $ %B= %%%$ % 5) % '1 $ ) J-+! "! ( % $%) )%/ $ $%!% $A, % * %% * ' % *! "! -!%) $ %'1 $ %%$ % 9(%.: % $$/) $% ) *9!): % % *%)$ )!% * * %'1 %$!) 6

!! # *. #$ % % & ' $ % ' ) & % 2$ #$ () *-. *) / & - & % *) (& 7 1 2% 3 & *& $ Roadway Improvement Limits Previously Planned Improvements U.S. 3 Widening to 4 Lanes IL 47 to IL 31 U.S. 3/IL 47 Widening to 4 Lanes Base Line Road to current 4 lane section IL 47 Widening to 4 Lanes Current 4 lane section to Main Street Galena Boulevard Widening to 4 Lanes IL 47 to Orchard Road I-88/IL 47 Interchange Interchange Completion IL 56/Hankes Road Interchange New Partial Interchange Gordon Road* New Construction 4 Lanes U.S. 3 to Galena Boulevard Potential Improvements Jericho Road Widening to 3 Lanes U.S. 3 to Orchard Road Bliss Road Widening to 3 Lanes IL 47 to Healy Road * Gordon Road is partially complete, / $ % $ ' / )$. %./%. 1./. %/,!.=.!% $ $ * *'!)" # * / $ & 8 ) *2& 1 ) 9$ % ' 2' $ & -. *) / & - & % *) (& 7 1 Improvement Major Projects U.S. 3 IL 47 to IL 31 U.S. 3/IL 47 IL 47 Galena Boulevard IL 47/I 88 Interchange IL 56/Hankes Road Interchange Gordon Road Jericho Road Bliss Road Limits Base Line Road to current 4 lane section Current 4 lane section to Main Street IL 47 to Orchard Road U.S. 3 to Galena Boulevard U.S. 3 to Orchard Road IL 47 to Healy Road Secondary Projects New Connection Dugan Road to Ashe Road New Connection New Connection New Connection Ashe Road to McCannon Road Indian Trail Road to Hankes Road Prairie Road (various locations)

!!! - %% $ % %'. 9'.: $ % $%55$C % & "!! -!% * $ % % ' % $% % % % % %!% $ ) ) % $%%!% %$%) %% /%% $ % / *$)% $) % )!!!% %'1$, $) )%% $ $!%% $)) %/ / $ / *! <) % /% $!% $ % ) $% % %) %)%, $ ) 2$%'1 1% $ $ % $ $)!%% 5 $) $%$ )!% $%$ " ) $! "!!% % %)% 5 $/$%% %; ' % $$) %F$/ % %%$ $ ) ) )!% $ % % ) < )

!!, % % $$ ) ) % $ $ % / %$) % % $ % %*$%!% $ %%C $ %%%$/)$ % %%$ % %$ &!% $ & % $*!%$ $) % %* ) $! "!, % / % $ % $ % ) )!% * )!)& # * 1 ) $ ' + $, -. *) / & - & % 1 Roadway Location Length (route-miles) Type U.S. 3 IL 47 to IL 31 4.7 4 Lanes U.S. 3/IL 47 Base Line Road to 4-Lane Section 2.4 4 Lanes IL 47 4-Lane Section to Main St. 3. 4 Lanes Galena Boulevard IL 47 to Orchard Road 3.5 4 Lanes Bliss Road IL 47 to Healy Road 2.7 3 Lanes Jericho Road IL 47 to Orchard Road 1.3 3 Lanes Gordon Road & Extension U.S. 3 to Galena Boulevard 2.7 4 Lanes I-88/IL 47 IL 56/ Hankes Road Partial Interchange New Partial Interchange Collectors* 42.9 2 Lanes Realignments* 4.7 2 Lanes * Only includes alignments within planning area others are shown to demonstrate connectivity #.$) 5 %!%#. %. $% ; / % %,>+- =. % $ % %$ &!% $ & % $*!%$ $) % %*

!!, % $%% * /!)&/% % % $ * $%%$ %!% % $)% % )!% %!% $/ %<% $,537,533 $) % %'1 /% $ % $ %!%$$ % )% % ) % %%!% $ %'1$%*% % )% ) $%% 6% % %$ %) /%'1 %)%!!% %(%./,>&/ #. ) %<% / $% <$ $) ) %@'"7 # / / /%8%.!% $ 5 $ ) $ *%)%%$ /% %%9B=: 5 $ & B=< % )B=< $%!% 5 >('$ + / $!%$% $" &!% $ $ & & ) =$/% $ %B1!9&- : $ B=/ & B1! + B= % 6%% % =.,>+- % %,533,>&/ %$$ "&&7 /%) % % %!)+%$ % $% %) % / %% $) %$/$%%%* $ >('!%$,533% ) % %$ %6@ / % $$ % %$ "

!!!%/ $ / % / % $ # * 2 ) -. $ *21 ) % ) 9*$ % 1. ) *$ 2) % & *9) *- $ % 7 & Measure of Effectiveness (MOE) Base Network Recommended Plan Vehicle-Hours of Delay (VHD)/Lane Mile 4 2 Percentage of Lane Miles at LOS F 15 1 Weighted Percentage of Lane Miles Congested 74 32 Percentage of VMT on Freeways/Arterials/Collectors 34 / 51 / 15 4 / 46 / 14 Estimated Cost N/A $265 325 Million* * Does not include cost outside the planning area boundary such as improvements in North Aurora or the regional connections.!%2' <$%%% %'1 $)$% %!% (%.!% #. $) $%5 $%% $ $#.!%,>& $ ) $ 5!% $,>&$)!%.$ 5 % 9 %55$: %'1 $ J"+!% J-+ % $6 %/ $ J-7 / J-+ < ) %% $ $) % % 1 % %'1 $) ),(!%%!% / % / )<!%)* %$!)- # * 3 *$ 292& ' ) 1 :, ; *21 ' 27 2) % Jurisdiction Route Miles Cost (millions) % of Total State (IDOT/ISTHA) 13.5 $11 34% County 4. $2 6% Others (Local/Developers) 5.3 $195 6% Total 67.8 $325 1%

!!!% % %55$ $ $ * $%!% % $ % C %);(! ' #!% ) )1 % % 2' ($ % $% @'"7 %B 1 %'!%$ '# % $% #.!% (%.$ %) % % (%.!% % ) %)1 ) ($ 1, ($/ %) % (%. 1. %) $% %, 1 / ) %' @'"7%% $%,>" ),> +-/,533/ (%.(% ) ) ), / 5 )%) % '1 < $% $ $!%)$) $%% % $) % ) / ) % ) $% *$ %(% %)< $ ) $% ) % < $%1 ) % +) /)/!, % ) / ; % ) )!%=%$ 9=6 : H%% $% %$ % // I $ / %%$/!% $ % % %%%;

!! % / 3 )% $ %'1 %(%.!% F %% C ) % $ A > 2 ),, ' #! >,, ' '>% ) > @ ' %.C.$ )!% ) %% % / / / / $ %!%% 9$: ) A % ) / %$ / $%% $/ /) %% $%55$!% % % ) /% / $% C $% % * /% %) / /%/ < %; /%; (%. @'"7.. $ %'1 4, % $% % ) $6% %%$% % ), %; $$%%,! 9(!: %% %'1 % %%$ / $)C % % $ 3, Division of Transportation Permit Regulations and Access Control Regulations, Kane County, January,24. 4 The term freeway as used in the Division of Transportation Permit Regulations and Access Control Regulations does not correspond with the functional classifications described in this report.

!! $!% %/$%%% $ $/$ %%% $ % % ) ; F%%$/$%% / / / % =%$ )%%1 )% )!$ %? *!% * $ ))$ % $!% $) ) 5 %)% %$$%$ / / C!) 3 $ C % # * 4 2% 2- ; - 28 % $ #2< & ' % & *1 & 7 2) %. $ 7 2% 8 Highway Classification Freeway and SRA Residential Freeway and SRA Commercial Rural Arterial Collector Urban/Suburban Arterial Collector 1,76 ft (1/3 mile) to 2,64 ft (1/2 mile) 1,32 ft (1/4 mile) to 1,76 ft (1/3 mile) 2,64 ft (1/2 mile) 1,32 ft (1/4 mile) Note: All dimensions approximate. # * 5 &. $ *$ 2) % = & + & & % ' ($ 7 & % > ; ##7 7 & 1 1 % & *1 & 7 2) % 1?9@ Access Level 3 Design Speed Access Level 1 Access Level 2 2 Lanes 4 Lanes 3 mph Signal Spacing 49 335 353 Guidelines Apply as 35 mph shown in Table 7 59 39 412 4 mph 69 445 47 45 mph 8 5 529 5 mph 91 555 588 55 mph 13 61 647 6 mph 115 665 76 4

!! ) % 6.%55$ %) ) C $ $ / % %55$ / $% / )% C ) % $ C %55$)$ $!%C $ ))!)4%$%%55$ ) # * 7 28 3 ) 9$, ; 2' & #2% & 1 Functional Classification Right-of-Way (Minimum) SRA Major Arterial 17 Minor Arterials 12 Collectors 8 % % $ $ )$,$ /%$/ % )%)! % / % % * % % $)C %%* % % $ ) % % %-%%%%!% % /) %$% /%$%%%%%!%%%,!.<=. $%%%% %6 %)% % %,>+-<=. % /$%% %6 % %C!% %<% $,>+- %# %% % '# %)# $)%%B#! )!%$%)% % )!% /$%%%) /!% %$$) % % '! 2 %) %, /)%%!% 9!: % #9#:$ $% $% 2/ $ $% 5

!! % $ %$% %!% $% % % %*1 $ $% % ; $% % ;.$ @ %'1 ()77"/ % $ $%) $% /C / $%% $ %/%$ $ $%%!% '1 # ;! ; 1 ;. % $ %* % %! "!!% % ) * $% %'1!% % $ % $% # % %% %'1/,> & @' "7 % )!% $ $%)% %, % / ) % %!%%%) )% %) $% =$/ %) %/ %%$ /$ $ ) 6 *%) % * $%!% )) %% $%% %$ ( % %) % )*% $)% %% 6

%

Upper Fox Upper Fox Northwest West Central Campton Hills Greater Elgin Northwest West Central Campton Hills Greater Elgin Southwest Tri-Cities Aurora Area Planning Area Boundaries Southwest Tri-Cities Aurora Area 22 VMT/Lane Mile Legend 22 VMT/Lane Miles >1, VMT/Lane Mile >5, VMT/Lane Mile <5, VMT/Lane Mile Upper Fox Upper Fox Northwest West Central Southwest Campton Hills Greater Elgin Tri-Cities Aurora Area 22 VHT/Lane Mile Legend 22 VHT/Lane Miles >3 VHT/Lane Mile >15 VHT/Lane Mile <15 VHT/Lane Mile Northwest West Central Southwest Campton Hills Greater Elgin Tri-Cities Aurora Area 22 VHD/Lane Mile Legend 22 VHD/Lane Miles >4 VHD/Lane Mile >2 VHD/Lane Mile <2 VHD/Lane Mile Upper Fox Upper Fox Northwest West Central Southwest Campton Hills Greater Elgin Tri-Cities Aurora Area Change in Speed 1996-22 Legend Percent Change in Speed >8% Change in Speed from 1996 >4% Change in Speed from 1996 <4% Change in Speed from 1996 Northwest West Central Southwest Campton Hills Greater Elgin Tri-Cities Aurora Area 22 Percent Congested by Lane Mile LOS D, E, and F Legend % Congested >8% LOS D, E, and F >4% LOS D, E, and F <4% LOS D, E, and F N Legend Immediate Need Near-Term Need Long-Term Need Planning Partnership Areas Figure 1 Kane County Transportation Planning Area Study

DeKALB COUNTY.-, 9 McHENRY COUNTY West "!31 "!47 (/ 2 Upper Fox "!25 "!72 "!72 Northwest Kane County Elgin Far West (/ 2.-, 9 COOK COUNTY N 2 4 Miles "!64 "!47 "!31 "!64 "!25 "!38 "!38 DuPAGE COUNTY.-, 88 DeKALB COUNTY "!56 Sugar Grove, Montgomery (SAM) "!56 (/ Aurora, 3 "!47.-, 88 "!25 "!31 (/ 3 Legend Number of Measures of Future Performance Rated Poor 1 measure 2 measures 3 measures 4 measures KENDALL COUNTY PPA Boundary Selected Planning Areas WILL COUNTY Planning Areas Selected for Further Study Figure 2 Kane County Transportation Planning Area Study

File Path: \\athena\proj\161525-kanecounty\gis\avprj\sam\april4_report\fig3_luchanges.mxd, Date: 3 16, 24 4:41:25 PM 1 37 88 47 25 36 North Aurora Scale 1:72, 26 22 88 3 Sugar Grove 14 137 56 75 88 Aurora 77 47 3 183 284 Montgomery Added Households for 22 Added Employment for 22 KENDALL COUNTY TAZ Airport Updated TAZ Commercial 3 Industrial Industrial/Commercial SAM Planning Area Kane County Planned Development SAM Boundary Commercial/Residential Residential School Figure 3 Kane County Transportation Planning Area Study

Sugar Grove File Path: \\athena\proj\161525-kanecounty\gis\avprj\sam\april4_report\fig4_kendallmodelupdate.mxd, Date: 3 16, 24 11:56:26 AM 47 Scale 1:96, 3 Montgomery 2. 83 KENDALL COUNTY 2. 2. 83 83 7.5 5219 3 7.5 5219 7.5 5219 31 3 2. 83 2. 83 2. 83 7.5 5219 7.5 5219 7.5 5219 34 25 2. 83 2. 83 2. 83 7.5 5219 7.5 5219 7.5 5219 2.75 145 2.75 145 47 2.75 145 2.75 145 Oswego 2.75 145 2.75 145 2.75 145 2.75 145 2.75 145 Yorkville 2.75 145 71 Factor for Updated 22 Added Trips for Updated 22 TAZ Updated TAZ Airport Commercial Industrial Industrial/Commercial SAM Planning Area Kendall County Planned Development Grouped TAZs Commercial/Residential Residential School Figure 4 Kane County Transportation Planning Area Study

Mighell Dugan McCannon Orchard 5th St. File Path: \\athena\proj\161525-kanecounty\gis\avprj\sam\april4_report\fig5_adtchange.mxd, Date: 3 17, 24 7:54:51 AM Finley Merill Norris Orchard Banbury Rd Healy Tanner Oak St. Scale 1:72, Scott Denny Ke-De-Ka Norris Hankes Deerpath Sullivan Indian Trail Aurora Ave. Densmore Randall Highland Ave. Lake St. W. Illinois Ave. Whildin Prairie St. Gordon Barnes Prairie St. Edgelawn Dr. Galena Blvd. North Ave. Raymond Prairie St. Jericho Jericho Main St. Lincoln Ave. 5th A Clark Jetter Ashe Jericho Base Line Bertram Aucutt Montgomery KENDALL COUNTY SAM Boundary Change in ADT (vpd) - 1 1-2 2-4 > 4, SAM Planning Area Change in Average Daily Traffic by Segment, 1997-22 Figure 5 Kane County Transportation Planning Area Study

Mighell Dugan McCannon Orchard 5th St. File Path: \\athena\proj\161525-kanecounty\gis\avprj\sam\april4_report\fig6_los22.mxd, Date: 3 16, 24 11:59:32 AM Finley Merill Norris Orchard Banbury Rd Healy Tanner Oak St. Scale 1:72, Scott Denny Ke-De-Ka Norris Hankes Deerpath Sullivan Indian Trail Aurora Ave. Densmore Randall Highland Ave. Lake St. W. Illinois Ave. Whildin Prairie St. Gordon Barnes Prairie St. Edgelawn Dr. Galena Blvd. North Ave. Raymond Prairie St. Jericho Jericho Main St. Lincoln Ave. 5th A Clark Jetter Ashe Jericho Base Line Bertram Aucutt Montgomery KENDALL COUNTY SAM Boundary Extreme Congestion (LOS F) on Existing plus Committed Network SAM Planning Area Projected 22 Congested Roadway Segments Figure 6 Kane County Transportation Planning Area Study

Mighell Dugan McCannon Orchard 5th St. File Path: \\athena\proj\161525-kanecounty\gis\avprj\sam\april4_report\fig7_constraints.mxd, Date: 3 16, 24 12:14:6 PM Norris Orchard Banbury Rd Sauer Family Prairie Kame F.P. Scott Finley Merill Hannaford Woods/ Nickels Farm F.P. Healy Denny Tanner Oak St. Scale 1:72, Mitchell Ke-De-Ka Bliss Woods F.P. Norris Aurora West F.P. Hankes Deerpath Sullivan Indian Trail Aurora Ave. Mitchell Densmore Randall Highland Ave. Lake St. Culver F.P. W. Illinois Ave. Prairie St. Gordon Barnes Barnes Property Prairie St. Edgelawn Dr. Galena Blvd. North Ave. C Galena Raymond Prairie St. Jericho Jericho Jericho Main St. Lincoln Ave. 5th AVE. Union St. Jetter Ashe Aucutt Montgomery Base Line Bertram SAM Boundary Parks Forest Preserve KENDALL COUNTY Existing Open Space Institutional Open Space Proposed Open Space Wetlands Flood Hydric Soils SAM Planning Area Constraints Map Figure 7 Kane County Transportation Planning Area Study

Mighell Dugan McCannon Orchard 5th St. File Path: \\athena\proj\161525-kanecounty\gis\avprj\sam\april4_report\fig8_boundary.mxd, Date: 3 16, 24 12:13:44 PM Whildin Seavey Raymond Scott Finley Prairie St. Jericho Merill Ke-De-Ka Sugar Grove/ Prairie St. Healy North Aurora 7/ Denny Sugar Grove/ Montgomery 21 Norris Norris Gordon Hankes Jericho Densmore Barnes Prairie St. Tanner Deerpath Aurora/ Sugar Grove 11/ Edgelawn Dr. Orchard Oak St. Aurora/ Sullivan North Aurora Indian Trail 12/99 Randall Jericho W. Illinois Ave. Galena Blvd. Montgomery/Aurora 2/9 Main St. Highland Ave. North Ave. Lincoln Ave. Lake St. Banbury Batav Scale 1:72, Aurora Ave. Gale 5th AVE. Jetter Ashe Bertram Aucutt Montgomery Base Line SAM Boundary KENDALL COUNTY Planning Boundary Agreement Lines SAM Planning Area Planning Boundary Agreements Figure 8 Kane County Transportation Planning Area Study

Mighell Dugan McCannon Orchard 5th St. File Path: \\athena\proj\161525-kanecounty\gis\avprj\sam\april4_report\fig9_plannedroads.mxd, Date: 3 16, 24 12:21:4 PM Norris Orchard Banbury Rd Finley Merill Healy Tanner Oak St. Scale 1:72, Scott Denny Mitchell Ke-De-Ka Norris Hankes Deerpath Sullivan Indian Trail Aurora Ave. Mitchell Densmore Randall Highland Ave. Lake St. W. Illinois Ave. Prairie St. Gordon Barnes Prairie St. Edgelawn Dr. Galena Blvd. North Ave. C Galena Raymond Prairie St. Jericho Jericho Jericho Main St. Lincoln Ave. 5th AVE. Union St. Jetter Ashe Bertram Aucutt Montgomery Base Line SAM Boundary KENDALL COUNTY Proposed Widening Proposed New Construction Proposed Realignment SAM Planning Area Previously Planned Road Improvements Figure 9 Kane County Transportation Planning Area Study

Mighell Dugan McCannon Orchard 5th St. File Path: \\athena\proj\161525-kanecounty\gis\avprj\sam\april4_report\fig1_plannedother.mxd, Date: 3 17, 24 7:43:52 AM Norris Orchard Banbury Rd Scott Finley Merill Healy Denny Tanner Oak St. Scale 1:72, Mitchell Ke-De-Ka Norris Hankes Deerpath Sullivan Indian Trail Aurora Ave. Mitchell Densmore Randall Highland Ave. Lake St. W. Illinois Ave. Prairie St. Gordon Barnes Prairie St. Edgelawn Dr. Galena Blvd. North Ave. C Galena Raymond Prairie St. Jericho Jericho Jericho Main St. Lincoln Ave. 5th AVE. Union St. Jetter Ashe Bertram Aucutt Montgomery Base Line KENDALL COUNTY SAM Boundary Existing Pace Bus Route Planned Express Bus Metra Stations Planned Bike/Pedestrian Trails Planned Metra Service Existing Bike/Pedestrian Trails SAM Planning Area Previously Planned Transit and Bike/Ped Improvements Figure 1 Kane County Transportation Planning Area Study

Mobility Arterials Collectors Land Access Locals Source: A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets 21 DRAFT T161525.BB.1.2 Access_Mobility 1-2-3 lg Access and Mobility Function of Highways Figure 11 Kane County Transportation Planning Area Study

Y123456 Three-Lane Cross Section Open Drainage CL x x x x 14 14 8 8 Closed Drainage - Bike Path DRAFT Desirable Collector Road Cross Section Figure 12 Kane County Transportation Planning Area Study T161525.BB.1.2 Collec_Rd_CroSec 1-3-3 lg

Mighell Dugan McCannon Orchard 5th St. File Path: \\athena\proj\161525-kanecounty\gis\avprj\sam\april4_report\fig13_newroads.mxd, Date: 3 16, 24 11:53:14 AM Norris Orchard Banbury Rd Scott Finley Merill Healy Denny Tanner Oak St. Scale 1:72, Mitchell Ke-De-Ka Norris Hankes Deerpath Sullivan Indian Trail Aurora Ave. Mitchell Densmore Randall Highland Ave. Lake St. W. Illinois Ave. Prairie St. Gordon Barnes Prairie St. Edgelawn Dr. Galena Blvd. North Ave. C Galena Raymond Prairie St. Jericho Jericho Jericho Main St. Lincoln Ave. 5th AVE. Union St. Jetter Ashe Bertram Aucutt Montgomery Base Line SAM Boundary KENDALL COUNTY SAM Plannning Area Proposed New Roads Proposed New Roads Figure 13 Kane County Transportation Planning Area Study

Mighell Dugan McCannon Orchard 5th St. File Path: \\athena\proj\161525-kanecounty\gis\avprj\sam\february4_report\fig14_recplan.mxd, Date: 3 8, 24 9:14:1 PM Finley Merill Norris Orchard Banbury Healy Tanner Oak St. Scale 1:72, Scott Denny X Ke-De-Ka Norris Hankes Deerpath Sullivan Indian Trail Aurora Ave. X X Densmore Randall Highland Ave. Lake St. X X W. Illinois Ave. Whildin X Prairie St. X Gordon X Barnes Prairie St. Edgelawn Dr. Galena Blvd. North Ave. Galena Blvd. Raymond Prairie St. X X Jericho Jericho Main St. Lincoln Ave. 5th AVE. Clark Jetter Ashe Jericho Base Line Bertram Aucutt Montgomery KENDALL COUNTY SAM Boundary Improved Facilities Corridor Management Minor Collector See Table 4 for Recommended Improvements Major Collector Arterial Interchange SAM Planning Area Recommended Roadway Plan Figure 14 Kane County Transportation Planning Area Study

Mighell Dugan McCannon Orchard 5th St. File Path: \\athena\proj\161525-kanecounty\gis\avprj\sam\april4_report\fig16_recother.mxd, Date: 3 16, 24 12:24:41 PM Norris Orchard Banbury R Finley Merill Healy Tanner Oak St. Scale 1:72, Scott Denny Mitchell Ke-De-Ka Norris Hankes Deerpath Sullivan Indian Trail Aurora Ave. Mitchell Densmore Randall Highland Ave. Lake St. W. Illinois Ave. Prairie St. Gordon Barnes Prairie St. Edgelawn Dr. Galena Blvd. North Ave. C Galena Raymond Prairie St. Jericho Jericho Jericho Main St. Lincoln Ave. 5th AVE. Union St. Jetter Ashe Bertram Aucutt Montgomery Base Line Planned Metra Station Suggested Metra Station SAM Boundary KENDALL COUNTY Planned Metra Service Suggested Metra Service Existing Pace Bus Route Planned Express Bus Proposed Bike/Pedestrian Trails SAM Planning Area Recommended Transit and Bike/Ped Plan Existing Bike/Pedestrian Trails Figure 15 Kane County Transportation Planning Area Study

Mighell Dugan McCannon Orchard 5th St. File Path: \\athena\proj\161525-kanecounty\gis\avprj\sam\april4_report\fig17_sensitiveareas.mxd, Date: 3 16, 24 3:1:4 PM Scott Finley Merill Healy Denny Norris Tanner Orchard Oak St. Banbury Rd Scale 1:72, Mitchell Ke-De-Ka Norris Hankes Deerpath Sullivan Indian Trail Aurora Ave. Mitchell Densmore Randall Highland Ave. Lake St. W. Illinois Ave. Prairie St. Gordon Barnes Prairie St. Edgelawn Dr. Galena Blvd. North Ave. C Galena Raymond Prairie St. Jericho Jericho Jericho Main St. Lincoln Ave. 5th AVE. Union St. Jetter Ashe Bertram Aucutt Montgomery Base Line KENDALL COUNTY Improved Facilities Minor Collector Major Collector Arterial Interchange SAM Boundary Parks Forest Preserve Impacted Areas Existing Open Space Institutional Open Space Proposed Open Space Wetlands Flood Hydric Soils SAM Planning Area Potentially Impacted Sensitive Areas Figure 16 Kane County Transportation Planning Area Study

& (

!"!" #$ % & & && '& ( &) # & "& * & ( & * & #$# & )!" #+, - Development Municipality Density Households Hanford Farm Sugar Grove * 17 Wiseman Hughes Sugar Grove * 251 Town Center Sugar Grove * 16 Kimball Homes Sugar Grove * 22 Neuman Homes Sugar Grove * 2 Diamonte Builders Sugar Grove 2.3 95 Crown Community Sugar Grove 2.3 146 Bliss Woods Sugar Grove * 69

! " # # $ %" % # & Development Municipality Density Households Black Walnut Trails Sugar Grove * 48 Walnut Woods Sugar Grove * 257 Windsor Pointe Sugar Grove * 425 Rolling Oaks Sugar Grove * 88 Foxmoor Montgomery * 523 Fairfield Way Montgomery * 444 Mason Farm Montgomery * 39 Montgomery M1 Montgomery * 76 Aurora B1 Aurora 1.5 315 Aurora A1 Aurora 1. 3 Aurora A2 Aurora 1. 75 Aurora B2 Aurora 1.5 366 Aurora B3 Aurora 1.5 58 Aurora B4 Aurora 1.5 398 Aurora C1 Aurora 2.3 143 Aurora C2 Aurora 2.3 191 Aurora Extra Aurora 1.5 548 North Aurora A North Aurora * 83 North Aurora B North Aurora * 41 North Aurora D North Aurora * 16 North Aurora E North Aurora * 15 North Aurora K North Aurora * 328 North Aurora M North Aurora * 161 North Aurora N North Aurora * 134 North Aurora O North Aurora * 329 * Number of Households was provided as part of development plan.!" #+ #$ *#+,#$ '

! " # # $ %" % # & ) ) ) * + 22 Forecasts by TAZ Added Zone Households Population Employment Household Population Employment Socioeconomic Assumptions by TAZ inside the SAM Planning Area 76 3 81 77 214 77 243 684 286 78 1 3 79 22 6 67 8 54 169 81 379 995 223 82 97 268 22 83 2 6 136 84 8 2 25 85 28 81 59 86 3 1 765 87 51 137 67 88 22 55 12 183 57 89 1 23 22 14 39 9 482 1251 91 153 396 86 92 374 122 67 93 385 127 25 94 188 49 122 95 12 255 65 96 284 726 3 75 27 97 64 183 181 137 38 98 249 764 21 99 274 685 15 1 288 764 6 11 71 189 53 12 698 1819 224 13 256 698 284 787 14 8 22 88 242 15 135 355 27 16 171 281 257 17 72 192 18 86 256 53 (

! " # # $ %" % # & ) ) ) * + 22 Forecasts by TAZ Added Zone Households Population Employment Household Population Employment 19 124 371 5 11 34 114 26 111 29 76 27 112 87 22 5 113 781 252 123 114 53 14 7 115 12 39 111 1 28 124 124 391 251 37 13 229 414 976 142 23 3 9 777 231 14 279 859 232 78 233 297 696 8 234 154 378 235 359 917 21 236 247 649 99 237 248 77 335 238 315 135 518 239 269 629 31 24 16 265 1775 241 53 1121 81 242 489 1375 47 243 1479 2881 193 244 399 1165 288 245 45 111 689 246 35 247 529 1397 121 248 1 3 142 253 2 9 522 254 1919 255 238 564 155 256 23 51 595 257 424 187 259 136 462 472,

! " # # $ %" % # & ) ) ) * + 22 Forecasts by TAZ Added Zone Households Population Employment Household Population Employment Subtotal 14724 3824 16543 95 257 Socioeconomic Assumptions by TAZ outside the SAM Planning Area 136 655 1642 34 25 69 251 243 616 37 26 273 85 22 367 224 642 114 36 1 Subtotal 1122 29 276 61 169 48 Total 15846 4114 16813 966 2676 48 -

File Path: \\athena\proj\161525-kanecounty\gis\avprj\sam\april4_report\figa1_taz.mxd, Date: 3 16, 24 11:55:12 AM 27 125 26 15 115 88 47 85 87 8 95 12 79 124 84 86 83 94 133 136 99 98 11 1 16 25 249 246 245 367 252 251 248 247 274 88 373 276 273 275 27 269 272 North Aurora 298 3 271 293 395 397 419 421 394 294 396 297 299 296 295 418 318 317 321 42 Scale 1:72, 32 319 342 112 114 242 244 266 268 29 292 314 316 14 78 77 3 82 81 9 93 Sugar Grove 89 92 91 56 97 96 15 14 111 18 17 113 11 19 241 238 237 243 24 239 265 262 261 267 Aurora 264 263 289 286 285 291 288 31 287 313 39 315 312 311 234 236 258 26 282 284 36 38 47 233 235 257 259 281 283 35 37 13 76 3 88 13 23 232 254 256 Montgomery 278 28 32 34 229 231 253 255 277 279 31 33 KENDALL COUNTY TAZ SAM Boundary TAZ ID Airport Commercial 3 Commercial/Residential Industrial Industrial/Commercial Residential School SAM Planning Area Traffic Analysis Zones Figure A-1 Kane County Transportation Planning Area Study

&)

! "#!"$ %& ' ( )* + %,,*% -+ + + +. % / + + + + + + % % + % + 1+ + +%2 + + # $+ % + %" +,%3 '% + + # 3,,$% 4* + + % # $ % 5 6 % 5 % + %7 %

! " #! $ #! " #!! %! & #! Cost ($ Millions per mile) Proposed Cross Section 3 Lanes 4 Lanes 5 Lanes Rural Arterial 4 Lane 4.5 3.75-6-Lane 5.25 5.25 4.5 Suburban or Urban Arterial 4-Lane 5.25 4.5-6-Lane 6.75 6.75 5.25 Suburban Arterial with Open Drainage 4-Lane 5. 4. 6-Lane 6. 6. 5. Two-Lane Roadways Rural 2.25 - - Suburban or Urban 2.5 - - + %" + % + + %+ %8 ++ + / % 4 + % +. % + % 1 ++ %!. % /. % 4 %-,,3,+ 1+.+ %

! " #! $ #! " #! Cost ($ Millions per mile) Equivalent Number of Lanes Over Equivalent Number of Lanes Under 2 3 Lanes 4 5 Lanes 6 7 Lanes 2 to 5 1. 2. 3. 6 to 7 2. 3. 4. Structures Over Minor Waterways 1. 1. 1.5 Note: Structures that are part of interchanges are not costed separately. Equivalent lanes refer to travel lanes and medians only. See text. For extra long bridges (over 2 feet), use $75 per square foot of assumed deck 49+. 1 % ++ 1 % (!! & " # " Item Cost ($ per square foot of widening) Widening of Structure $15 + + % / : % ; % < 7 / / < & / + : % & ++ % '+ % 45 % '

* +! #! Intersection Type Additional Cost ($ each) Cross street is another arterial Existing unsignalized intersection which is to be newly signalized, or newly proposed intersection which is to be signalized, where cross street is: 4 lanes or wider 4, 3 lanes or narrower 2, At an interchange ramp -- Other intersections -- = % + #$+ / #$%! " & 1 % '% # $ % + % + / %43 % %! #,! & Interchange Type Cost ($ Millions, each) Single Point Diamond 18. Typical Diamond or Parclo 12. $ # & " +. %">*,,+,,,+ >3,+,,, %! %?% )

&

SAM Recommended Plan Area Routes Summary (Summary of links with a route code > ) 4/14/24 7:32:12 AM Route Lane Miles (miles) Sum of VMT Sum of VHT VMT/ VHT Sum of VHD 3.4 26,11 782 33.4 96 F 4 Perry 3.5 3,531 11 35.1 A 24 Jericho 12.4 54,666 1,58 34.6 17 D 48 Scott 1.8 1,823 52 35.1 A 78 Bliss Rd 4.7 2,668 52 39.7 3 C 83 Orchard 2.9 152,232 4,527 33.6 68 D 188 Interstate 88 21.6 362,159 6,536 55.4 425 E 23 US 3 35.6 234,141 5,93 39.5 16 D 347 IL 47 18.6 59,174 1,428 41.4 B 356 IL 56 15.4 182,75 2,828 64.6 16 C 81 Prairie St 13.9 25,737 779 33. 16 D 82 Galena Blvd 17.4 72,476 2,85 34.8 14 C 83 Hankes Rd 6.3 2,21 597 33.9 4 C 84 Sullivan Rd 2.4 4,634 146 31.8 B 85 Indian Trail Rd 5.2 13,46 396 33.8 B 86 West Illinois Ave 1.7 7,312 21 34.9 C 87 Wheeler Rd 4.8 1,27 34 35. A 88 Dugan Rd 9.4 21,631 622 34.8 5 C 89 Baseline Rd 4.3 12,397 354 35. C 81 Seavey Rd 2.8 2,816 8 35.1 A 811 Ke-De-Ka Rd 1.6 3,898 112 34.9 B 812 Merrill Rd 3.6 2,53 59 35. A 813 Denny Rd 2.2 242 7 35. A 814 Norris Rd 3.6 3,655 14 35. A 815 Deerpath Rd 4.8 4,683 134 35. A 816 Densmore Rd 1.6 2,935 89 32.9 B 817 Gordon Rd 3.9 9,382 27 34.8 B 818 Barnes Rd 3.8 1,335 38 35.2 A 819 Bertram Rd 1.2 93 25 35.5 A 82 Mighell Rd 3.1 6,27 182 34.4 3 E 821 Ashe Rd 1.8 8,6 232 34.5 3 D J:\161525-KaneCounty\2e\Planning Areas\SAM\Base\4_split_centroids\RecPlan_v8Final\SAM_BASE_recplan_v8.txt LOS Page 2-1

Route Lane Miles (miles) Sum of VMT Sum of VHT VMT/ VHT Sum of VHD 822 Aucutt Rd 3. 8,544 286 29.9 1 C 823 Albright Rd.6 2,79 92 29.5 2 D 824 Jericho Rd 1.7 4,964 165 3. C 825 3.2 4,717 157 3. A 826 3.6 578 16 35.1 A 827 2. 726 21 35.1 A 828 2.3 1,398 4 34.8 A 829 6.1 3,32 95 34.9 A 83 2.2 876 25 35.2 A 831 5.4 3,33 95 34.9 A 833 2.2 19 3 35. A 834 3.5 3,924 112 35. B 835.8 49 1 34.7 A 836 3. 57 15 34.7 A 837 1.5 353 1 35.1 A 838 2.6 1,52 42 35.4 A 839 8.8 12,765 364 35.1 A 84 2.9 2,652 76 35. A 841 3.5 2,793 8 34.8 B 842 4. 7,65 217 35. B 843 9.5 2,853 611 34.1 5 C 844 2.4 4,855 138 35.2 B 845 2. 1,474 42 35. A 846 1.7 51 1 34.9 A 847 3. 536 15 35.1 A 848 Scott Rd 1.9 2,788 8 35. A 849 3.8 379 11 35.1 A 85 3.6 1,17 32 35. A 851 1.3 3,374 97 35. 1 C LOS J:\161525-KaneCounty\2e\Planning Areas\SAM\Base\4_split_centroids\RecPlan_v8Final\SAM_BASE_recplan_v8.txt Page 2-2

SAM Recommended Plan 4/14/24 7:32:12 AM Summary of Links in Area Area Distance (miles) Approximate Route Miles (miles) Lane Miles (miles) Sum of VMT VMT/ LnMi Sum of VHT VHT/ LnMi Sum of VHD VHD/ LnMi VMT/VHT 3 258. 129. 329 1,421,172 4,314 33,779 13 784 2 42 Summary of Links in Area (without Interstates) Area Distance (miles) Approximate Route Miles (miles) Lane Miles (miles) Sum of VMT VMT/ LnMi Sum of VHT VHT/ LnMi Sum of VHD VHD/ LnMi VMT/VHT 3 247.2 123.6 38 1,59,13 3,44 27,243 89 359 1 39 J:\161525-KaneCounty\2e\Planning Areas\SAM\Base\4_split_centroids\RecPlan_v8Final\SAM_BASE_recplan_v8.txt Page 1-1

SAM Recommended Plan 4/14/24 7:32:12 AM Area Summary of Lane Miles by LOS LOS Lane Miles (miles) A 94.73 29% B 46.62 14% C 74.74 23% D 85.28 26% E 24.72 8% F 3.38 1% 329.47 Area Summary of Lane Miles by LOS (without Interstates) LOS Lane Miles (miles) A 94.73 31% B 46.62 15% C 74.74 24% D 85.28 28% E 3.8 1% F 3.38 1% 37.83 J:\161525-KaneCounty\2e\Planning Areas\SAM\Base\4_split_centroids\RecPlan_v8Final\SAM_BASE_recplan_v8.txt Page 1-1

SAM Recommended Plan Jurisdiction Summary (Summary of links in Area with Rte Code) 4/14/24 7:32:13 AM Jurisdiction Distance (miles) Approximate Route Miles (miles) Lane Miles (miles) Interstate 1.8 13.4% 5.4 13.4% 22 16.1% 362,159 33.8% 6,536 27.8% 425 66.9% US Highway 2.1 24.9% 1.1 24.9% 36 26.5% 234,141 21.9% 5,93 25.2% 16 16.7% State Highway 17. 21.% 8.5 21.% 34 25.3% 241,879 22.6% 4,256 18.1% 16 2.6% County 32.8 4.6% 16.4 4.6% 43 32.2% 232,92 21.7% 6,781 28.9% 88 13.8% Sum of VMT Sum of VHT 8.8 4.4 134.5 1,71,99.1 23,52.3 635. Sum of VHD J:\161525-KaneCounty\2e\Planning Areas\SAM\Base\4_split_centroids\RecPlan_v8Final\SAM_BASE_recplan_v8.txt Page 1-1

SAM Recommended Plan Area Roads Functional Class Summary (Summary of links in area with Rte Code > ) 4/14/24 7:32:13 AM Route Distance (miles) Approximate Route Miles (miles) Lane Miles (miles) Collector 155.1 6.1% 77.5 6.1% 155 47.1% 22,721 14.3% 5,947 17.6% 38 4.9% Expressways and Principal Arterials 51.2 19.8% 25.6 19.8% 98 29.7% 531,43 37.4% 14,366 42.5% 188 24.% Freeways and Ramps 21.9 8.5% 11. 8.5% 4 12.3% 57,966 4.2% 1,146 3.% 536 68.5% Minor Arterials 29.8 11.6% 14.9 11.6% 36 11.% 116,56 8.2% 3,32 9.8% 21 2.7% Sum of VMT Sum of VHT 258. 129. 329.5 1,421,172.3 33,778.7 783.5 Sum of VHD J:\161525-KaneCounty\2e\Planning Areas\SAM\Base\4_split_centroids\RecPlan_v8Final\SAM_BASE_recplan_v8.txt Page 1-1

&

! "# " $ % $!$ % $ & '(' # ) **! * % $ + * ** ", -",. " /,!$ * " %1, 1 &2% $, *! * ", "3!.*, * **3! ***,"! 4 *, *5******!4, **, "*"6 ***!4*" *, * "*! 7, " *!* ", *****,! # *. 2", *!4*# **, ",!8" " / *, 1 The County Highways designated by the County Board as Limited Access Freeways are: Fabyan Parkway from Randall Road to DuPage County Line Kirk Road from IL 56 (Butterfield Road) to Dunham Road Dunham Road from Kirk to IL 25 Orchard Road from U.S. 3 to Randall Road Randall Road from East-West Tollway (I-88) to North County Line

, "",", *, " " *,! 9, ", * / *,!%2 " * * ** **, "!%2 "* ** * "*",! # 2 *!% * * "..! 1 " * * " *, :*:,! % * ** " * "! 5 *"*! 8 "/,, "!% "* *, "", *****,!4*. *,!% ",,! *" *,, ",,,!1, *", ",! #, *2 *!. *, ", ", " *# **!%, " * ** " " ** :) 2 ;)! 9 " *, # "),, ),, :*:,*,! ** * *, #", * #*! * *!

<= * "* " ***! <& * " *" "**! <& * >" *! 7 * * **, 3?.1 %4? @.1 %? $:;$: $: 6, A? 6B %"5 A*, "*, / B* *" #!7 #, " #! * * **,* " ***!, * A&@6B!? *. * ",! *, ** # * " " *,! 4*, "46 ", #! ;" " ** #,&@6+, -, "5!! " * * "!*, ", *,!?* $ =,? 4 ** %*:*:,

$:*:, # ;" ; " # $ **,, #!** * **, * "! 6*, #, *, * "/ " "), ) : ** :!