Financial Econometrics Jeffrey R. Russell. Midterm 2014 Suggested Solutions. TA: B. B. Deng

Similar documents
Financial Econometrics Jeffrey R. Russell Midterm 2014

Financial Econometrics

GARCH Models. Instructor: G. William Schwert

Research Article The Volatility of the Index of Shanghai Stock Market Research Based on ARCH and Its Extended Forms

Financial Econometrics: Problem Set # 3 Solutions

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2012, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Midterm

Random Walks vs Random Variables. The Random Walk Model. Simple rate of return to an asset is: Simple rate of return

Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2007, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Midterm

Econometric Models for the Analysis of Financial Portfolios

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2016, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Midterm

Indian Institute of Management Calcutta. Working Paper Series. WPS No. 797 March Implied Volatility and Predictability of GARCH Models

The Great Moderation Flattens Fat Tails: Disappearing Leptokurtosis

Chapter 4 Level of Volatility in the Indian Stock Market

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2010, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Midterm

Lecture 5a: ARCH Models

Financial Econometrics

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 1. 2) descriptive statistics and correlogram. Series: LGCSI Sample 12/31/ /11/2009 Observations 2596

VOLATILITY. Time Varying Volatility

Volatility Clustering of Fine Wine Prices assuming Different Distributions

Modelling Stock Market Return Volatility: Evidence from India

Donald Trump's Random Walk Up Wall Street

ARCH and GARCH models

Lecture Note of Bus 41202, Spring 2008: More Volatility Models. Mr. Ruey Tsay

The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2012, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam

CHAPTER 5. Introduction to Risk, Return, and the Historical Record INVESTMENTS BODIE, KANE, MARCUS. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

On modelling of electricity spot price

The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2009, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2012, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Midterm

I. Return Calculations (20 pts, 4 points each)

Annual VaR from High Frequency Data. Abstract

Financial Times Series. Lecture 6

Conditional Heteroscedasticity

FINA 695 Assignment 1 Simon Foucher

Monetary Economics Measuring Asset Returns. Gerald P. Dwyer Fall 2015

Forecasting Stock Index Futures Price Volatility: Linear vs. Nonlinear Models

Example 1 of econometric analysis: the Market Model

Linda Allen, Jacob Boudoukh and Anthony Saunders, Understanding Market, Credit and Operational Risk: The Value at Risk Approach

Annex 1: Heterogeneous autonomous factors forecast

Thailand Statistician January 2016; 14(1): Contributed paper

MODELING EXCHANGE RATE VOLATILITY OF UZBEK SUM BY USING ARCH FAMILY MODELS

Statistical Inference and Methods

Jaime Frade Dr. Niu Interest rate modeling

Financial Econometrics

Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2007, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Final Exam

Amath 546/Econ 589 Univariate GARCH Models

Financial Econometrics Review Session Notes 4

Global Volatility and Forex Returns in East Asia

Oil Price Effects on Exchange Rate and Price Level: The Case of South Korea

A market risk model for asymmetric distributed series of return

Lampiran 1 : Grafik Data HIV Asli

Leverage and Asymmetric Volatility: The Firm Level Evidence

12. Conditional heteroscedastic models (ARCH) MA6622, Ernesto Mordecki, CityU, HK, 2006.

Volatility Analysis of Nepalese Stock Market

INFORMATION EFFICIENCY HYPOTHESIS THE FINANCIAL VOLATILITY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC CASE

A potentially useful approach to model nonlinearities in time series is to assume different behavior (structural break) in different subsamples

Quantitative Finance Conditional Heteroskedastic Models

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2014, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Midterm

Risk Management and Time Series

Lecture 6: Non Normal Distributions

Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2007, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam

Variance clustering. Two motivations, volatility clustering, and implied volatility

INVESTMENTS Class 2: Securities, Random Walk on Wall Street

Market Risk Prediction under Long Memory: When VaR is Higher than Expected

Prerequisites for modeling price and return data series for the Bucharest Stock Exchange

Financial Time Series Analysis (FTSA)

Fin285a:Computer Simulations and Risk Assessment Section 7.1 Modeling Volatility: basic models Daníelson, ,

Evidence of Market Inefficiency from the Bucharest Stock Exchange

Forecasting Volatility of USD/MUR Exchange Rate using a GARCH (1,1) model with GED and Student s-t errors

Model Construction & Forecast Based Portfolio Allocation:

Appendixes Appendix 1 Data of Dependent Variables and Independent Variables Period

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2013, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Midterm

Economics 483. Midterm Exam. 1. Consider the following monthly data for Microsoft stock over the period December 1995 through December 1996:

Two Hours. Mathematical formula books and statistical tables are to be provided THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER. 22 January :00 16:00

Final Exam Suggested Solutions

Amath 546/Econ 589 Univariate GARCH Models: Advanced Topics

Empirical Analysis of Stock Return Volatility with Regime Change: The Case of Vietnam Stock Market

Modelling of Long-Term Risk

Occasional Paper. Risk Measurement Illiquidity Distortions. Jiaqi Chen and Michael L. Tindall

Regime-dependent Characteristics of KOSPI Return

Financial Data Analysis, WS08/09. Roman Liesenfeld, University of Kiel 1

Properties of financail time series GARCH(p,q) models Risk premium and ARCH-M models Leverage effects and asymmetric GARCH models.

Chapter 6 Forecasting Volatility using Stochastic Volatility Model

Assicurazioni Generali: An Option Pricing Case with NAGARCH

VOLATILITY. Finance is risk/return trade-off.

Assessing Model Stability Using Recursive Estimation and Recursive Residuals

SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES Quantitative Finance and Investment Advanced Exam Exam QFIADV AFTERNOON SESSION

High-Frequency Data Analysis and Market Microstructure [Tsay (2005), chapter 5]

Financial Risk Forecasting Chapter 9 Extreme Value Theory

The Effect of 9/11 on the Stock Market Volatility Dynamics: Empirical Evidence from a Front Line State

Cross-Sectional Distribution of GARCH Coefficients across S&P 500 Constituents : Time-Variation over the Period

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 2. 2) graphs. 3) unit root tests

Modeling Uncertainty in Financial Markets

CHAPTER 5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. In this chapter the results and computer analysis output will be discussed in

Problem Set 4 Answer Key

Changes in Macroeconomic Policies and Volatility of Chinese Stock Market

Continuous Distributions

Financial Time Series and Their Characteristics

CHAPTER 5. Introduction to Risk, Return, and the Historical Record INVESTMENTS BODIE, KANE, MARCUS. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

2.1 Properties of PDFs

Bayesian Estimation of the Markov-Switching GARCH(1,1) Model with Student-t Innovations

Transcription:

Financial Econometrics Jeffrey R. Russell Midterm 2014 Suggested Solutions TA: B. B. Deng

Unless otherwise stated, e t is iid N(0,s 2 ) 1. (12 points) Consider the three series y1, y2, y3, and y4. Match each of the series up with the models the model that appears most appropriate below. r = β + β r + θε + ε. Let t 0 1 t 1 1 t 1 t a. b 0 =1, b 1 =.9, q 1 =.9, and s=5 3 b. b 0 =1, b 1 =.9, q 1 =-.9, and s=1 2 c. b 0 =1, b 1 =0, q 1 =.9, and s=1 4 d. b 0 =1, b 1 =.9, q 1 =0, and s=1 1 2

2 2. (28 points) Consider the AR(1) model y t = β 0 + β 1 y t 1 + ε t where t ~ iid N ( 0, ) a. For what values of b 0, b 1 and s is the mean reverting? ε σ. β! < 1, σ! finite Now let b 0 =.5, b 1 =.9 and s=2. b. What is the unconditional mean? β! 1 β! = 5 c. What is the unconditional variance? σ! 1 β!! = 21.05 d. Let y T =4.1. What is the conditional mean E( y y )? T+ 1 T 0.5 + 0.9 4.1 = 4.19 e. Let y T =4.1 and e T =- 1.2. What is the conditional variance Var ( y y )? T+ 1 T σ! = 2! = 4 f. What is the conditional distribution f ( y y ) T+ 1 T N 4.19, 4 3

g. Let y T =4.1 and e T =- 1.2. Find E( y y ε ) t+ t t 2, E y!!! y! =. 9! (4.1) + 1. 9! 5 = 4.27 h. Let y T =4.1 and e T =- 1.2. Find E( y y ε ) t+ t t 3, E y!!! y! =. 9! (4.1) + 1. 9! 5 = 4.34 4

3. (28 points) Here are continuously compounded returns for the DJIA from 1990 to 1/26/2012. 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0-0.075-0.050-0.025 0.000 0.025 0.050 0.075 0.100 Series: RET Sample 1/03/2000 1/25/2012 Observations 3034 Mean 3.83e-05 Median 0.000449 Maximum 0.105083 Minimum -0.082005 Std. Dev. 0.012918 Skewness -0.046813 Kurtosis 10.07672 Jarque-Bera 6332.055 Probability 0.000000 For parts a. and b. of this problem, assume that the natural log of the DJIA prices follows a random walk model. The index level (not log level) at the close on 1/26/2012 was 12,756 a. Symmetry Symmetric / slightly negatively skewed b. Fatness of tails relative to Normal / fatness of tails holding variance constant Big kurtosis => fat tails c. The drift can be estimated from the sample mean and the standard deviation of the error can be estimated by the standard deviation in the above output. Find the k- step ahead forecast of the log DJIA index level as a function of k and the initial log index. Use sample estimates where they appear in the forecast equation. Random Walk Model: y! = β! + y!!! + ε! β! = 0.0000383 So, y!! = k 0.0000383 + ln 12,756 y!! = k 0.0000383 + 9.453757 5

d. Find the k- step ahead forecast error variance associated with part a. as a function of k. Use sample estimates where they appear in the forecast error variance expression. y! = β! + y!!! + ε! ε! N 0,0.012918! So, Var y!! = k 0.012918! e. Consider the following output for the DJIA continuously compounded returns. Are then predictable? Explain with the use of supporting evidence. Yes, the returns are predictable since the autocorrelations are significantly different from 0. We can tell this from the large Q- stat values and the small associated p- values. We can even see this visually since (at least) the first two autocorrelation bars are outside the dashed significance lines. Next, consider the following models fit for the DJIA returns data. Two MA models are estimated below for the DJIA returns data. The first is a pre- financial crisis data set prior to 2007. The second is a data set that primarily focuses on the period of the financial crisis, from January 2007 to present. 6

Dependent Variable: RET Method: Least Squares Date: 02/08/10 Time: 22:16 Sample: 1/01/1990 1/26/2007 Included observations: 4436 Convergence achieved after 6 iterations MA Backcast: 12/27/1989 12/29/1989 Variable Coefficient Std. Error t- Statistic Prob. C 0.000353 0.000141 2.505348 0.0123 MA(1) 0.001926 0.015028 0.128172 0.8980 MA(2) - 0.024203 0.015032-1.610151 0.1074 MA(3) - 0.014765 0.015037-0.981913 0.3262 R- squared :.000766 Dependent Variable: RET Method: Least Squares Date: 02/08/10 Time: 22:15 Sample (adjusted): 1/01/2007 6/03/2009 Included observations: 633 after adjustments Convergence achieved after 7 iterations MA Backcast: 12/27/2006 12/29/2006 Variable Coefficient Std. Error t- Statistic Prob. C - 0.000457 0.000608-0.751799 0.4525 MA(1) - 0.143672 0.039738-3.615450 0.0003 MA(2) - 0.106021 0.039924-2.655579 0.0081 MA(3) 0.090011 0.039781 2.262692 0.0240 R- squared :.041178 f. For the crisis sample, find the forecast of the return E( r ε, ε, ε,...) as a t+ k t t 1 t 2 function of εt, εt 1, εt 2,..., and the estimated parameters above. You should have forecasts for all k>0. E r!!! F! = c + θ! ε! + θ! ε!!! + θ! ε!!! E r!!! F! = c + θ! ε! + θ! ε!!! E r!!! F! = c + θ! ε! E r!!! F! = c for k > 3 7

g. Explain in plain English what the difference is between the pre- crisis and the crisis return dynamics. In the pre- crisis sample, the MA coefficients were NOT statistically significant, so we can infer LITTLE dependence relation using these. Hence we could not use previous errors to predict future returns. In the crisis sample, we do see significant MA coefficients. The values of these MA coefficients imply that we might see returns overshoot on surprises and then oscillate to a stable value. Notice the signs of the MA coefficients in the crisis sample suggest reversal behavior. 4. (20 points) Below is the estimated GARCH model for the DJIA return series in problem 3. Variance Equation C 1.06E- 06 1.37E- 07 7.757034 0.0000 RESID(- 1)^2 0.070310 0.004392 16.01029 0.0000 GARCH(- 1) 0.921003 0.005118 179.9711 0.0000 a. The last return in the sample is -.0104 and the value of h T associated with the last observation in the sample is.000125. Write the one- step ahead forecast of the variance. h!!! = 0.00000106 + 0.070310 0.0104! + 0.921003 0.000125 = 0.00012379 b. Find the expected variance for the cumulative return over the next 5 days. Report the annualized volatility. where So!!!! σ! = E h!!! F! = σ! + α + β!!! h!!! σ! ω 1 α β = 0.00000106 1 0.070310 0.921003 = 0.00012202 σ! + α + β!!! h!!! σ! 8

! = 0.00012202 + 0.991313!!! 0.00012379 0.00012202!!! = 0.00061880 5 day cumulative variance So, annualized volatility is: 0.00061880 252 5 = 0.1766 c. What number does the forecast for the variance of the cumulative return get close to (in an annualized basis) when the number of days gets large? Cumulative Variance: 252 σ! = 252 0.00012202 = 0.0307 Cumulative Standard Deviation: 0.0307 = 0.1754 Now consider the following TARCH (asymmetric GARCH model). d. What is the one- step ahead conditional variance if the last return in the sample is -.0104 and the value of h T associated with the last observation in the sample is.000125. h!!! = 1.44 10!! +.013761 0.0104! +. 160407.0104! + (.922455). 000125 9

Now consider the following output obtained from the symmetric GARCH(1,1) model. e. What do the autocorrelations tell you about whether or not the GARCH(1,1) model appears to fit the volatility dynamics well? Be specific. Yes, the model does seem to fit reasonably well. From eyeballing the autocorrelation bars, we don t see much significance for the first few lags. Also, the autocorrelations only start to meet a non- negligible p- value after the 4 th lag. 5. (12 points) Let r t denote the continuously compounded returns on an asset and let d t denote the price dividend ratio of the asset. You use the price dividends to forecast future returns over different time horizons. Suppose that rt = β1dt 1+ ε and t dt = φdt 1 + η where e t t and h t are iid, mean zero and independent of each other. Both r t and d t are mean reverting and stationary. 10

a. Find E( r + r d ) t+ 1 t t 1 E r!!! + r! d!!! = β! d!!! φ + 1 b. Find E( r + r + r d ) t+ 2 t+ 1 t t 1 E r!!! + r!!! + r! d!!! = β! d!!! φ! + φ + 1 c. What is E( r +... + r + r d ) t+ k t+ 1 t t 1! β! d!!! φ!!!! = β! d!!! 1 φ!!! 1 φ d. What does the forecast converge to as k gets large? β! d!!! 1 1 φ 11