Mike Boerner, ASA, MAAA, Director Actuarial Office Financial Regulation Division, Texas Department of Insurance Chair: NAIC Life Actuarial (A) Task

Similar documents
PBR Implementation Update and Other Valuation Related Issues

MIKE BOERNER Director, Actuarial Office, Financial Texas Department of Insurance

Post-NAIC Update/PBA Webinar

Session 04PD: Statutory Life and Annuity Issues. Moderator: Thomas A Campbell FSA,MAAA,CERA

Article from. The Financial Reporter. December 2015 Issue 103

Katie Campbell, FSA, MAAA

Session 10, Statutory Life and Annuity Valuation Issues. Moderator: Donna R Claire FSA, CERA, MAAA

PBR Resources from the Life Practice Council of the American Academy of Actuaries

Post-NAIC Update/PBA Webinar

Post-NAIC Update Webinar

Valuation Manual. Jan. 1, 2018 Edition

Use of Qualified Actuary in the Valuation Manual

With the exposure draft including several layers of red-lining, we have attached a copy of the two sections with all changes accepted.

11/17/2009. Introduction. Outline. Principles-Based Reserving Education Session 7:30-9:00 Maryland Ballroom D. NAIC 2009 Fall National Meeting

NAIC Bulletin Highlights of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners meeting

Article from. Small Talk. September 2016 Issue 46

NAIC 2015 Spring Meeting

Life Actuarial (A) Task Force/ Health Actuarial (B) Task Force Amendment Proposal Form*

Please contact Bill Rapp assistant director of Public Policy at the Academy, if you have any questions.

Impact of VM-20 and 2017 CSO on Life Insurance Pricing

NAIC Bulletin Highlights of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners meeting

Life Insurance Update

Dave Sandberg, FSA, MAAA Vice President, Life Practice Council

NAIC Update Southeastern Actuaries Conference June 20, 2014 Clearwater, FL

Session 39 PD, Non-Variable Annuity PBR Update. Moderator: James W. Lamson, FSA, MAAA

ACCELERATED UNDERWRITING

NAIC Bulletin Highlights of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners meeting

SI/Accelerated Underwriting VM20 Practice Work Group Update

Life Actuarial (A) Task Force. Exposure of Potential* Mortality Tables for. Guaranteed Issue Mortality. and. Amendment Proposal

Session 18, Non-Variable Annuity PBR Update. Moderator: John R Miller FSA, MAAA. Presenters: Corinne R Jacobson FSA, MAAA Michael C Ward FSA, MAAA

Session 102 PD - Impact of VM-20 on Life Insurance Pricing. Moderator: Trevor D. Huseman, FSA, MAAA

Session 29, PBR is Coming Soon! Moderator: Kerry A. Krantz, FSA, MAAA

Revised Appendix 6, Policyholder Behavior Data Format

Session 20, Professionalism and PBR: Adapting to a New Environment. Moderator: Jerry F. Enoch, FSA, MAAA

Session 51 PD, VM31 - PBR Actuarial Report - Which ASOPs Matter? Moderator: Leonard Mangini, FSA, FALU, FRM, MAAA

Principle Based Reserves

Session 48PD: PBR - Real Life Applications. Moderator: Alberto A Abalo FSA,MAAA,CERA

PBR for Regulatory Actuaries

Analysis of Proposed Principle-Based Approach

NAIC s Center for Insurance Policy and Research Summit: Exploring Insurers Liabilities

Question and Commentary regarding application of VM-20 mortality to business issued under an Accelerated Underwriting program

9/6/13 Long-Term Care Pricing Subgroup Call Discussion Document

Session 03PD: PBR Reporting and Disclosures Thinking About the End at the Beginning. Moderator: James Russell Collingwood ASA,MAAA

REINSURANCE OVERVIEW. Mary Bahna-Nolan, MAAA, CERA, FSA Richard Daillak, MAAA, FSA Arnold Dicke, MAAA, FSA, FCA, CERA Sheldon Summers, MAAA, FSA

NAIC Fall Meeting. December Issues & Trends. kpmg.com/us/frv

PBR: What does it mean for smaller companies. Alexandre Lemieux, FSA, MAAA March 23 rd, 2016

RE: Comment Letter on APF to Keep Term and ULSG Separate in VM-20 Calculation to Reduce Allocation Concerns

PBR Regulatory Update and Implementation Challenges

Session 14PD: Non-Variable Annuity PBR: Let's Set Valuation Rates Daily! Moderator: Amber Ruiz FSA,MAAA

Session 79 PD, Regulatory Update. Moderator: Francis de Regnaucourt, FSA, CERA, FCIA, MAAA

Modernization In Insurance Regulation

STATE REGULATION OF CAPTIVE REINSURANCE TRANSACTIONS

NAIC Bulletin Highlights of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners meeting

Iowa Actuaries Club. Chris Conrad, MAAA, FSA SVL Interest Rate Modernization Work Group Thursday, February 25, 2016

PBR in the Audit: What to Expect Michael Fruchter, FSA, MAAA Emily Cassidy, ASA, MAAA

Are We Ready For PBR

MEDAMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY Address: 165 Court Street, Rochester, New York Series 11 and Prior Actuarial Memorandum.

Mortality Margins. Mortality Development and Margins Update Society of Actuaries & American Academy of Actuaries Joint Project Oversight Group

Principle Based Reserves Ohio Chapter IASA. November 21, 2016 Columbus, OH

Session 021 TS - U.S. Statutory Update: Annuities. Moderator: Simpa A. Baiye, FSA MAAA

Practical Advice on PBR Implementation Where are we, and how are companies preparing?

Modeling by the Ceding Company and/or Reinsurer

Consistency Work Group September Robert DiRico, A.S.A., M.A.A.A., Chair of the Consistency Work Group

Article from: Small Talk. June 2009 Issue No.32

In December 2015, the NAIC adopted the 2017 Commissioners

Session 110 PD - VM-20 for Senior Management. Moderator: Carrie Lee Kelley, FSA, MAAA

Advanced Seminar on Principle Based Capital September 23, 2009 Session 1: C3P3 Overview

VALUATION MANUAL. NAIC Adoptions Through. April 6, 2016

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE LCB FILE NO. R188-18I. The following document is the initial draft regulation proposed

NAIC BLANKS (E) WORKING GROUP

REPORT OF THE JOINT AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ACTUARIES/SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES PREFERRED MORTALITY VALUATION TABLE TEAM

SIMPLIFIED ISSUE & ACCELERATED UNDERWRITING MORTALITY UNDER VM-20

2016 American Academy of Actuaries. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced without express permission. STOCHASTIC, DETERMINISTIC AND NPR RESERVES

Dave Sandberg Vice President for Life, American Academy of Actuaries

NON-VARIABLE ANNUITY PBR UPDATE

August 15, Al Schmitz, MAAA, FSA, Chairperson LTC PBR Work Group

Wisconsin IASA. Statement Update. Wisconsin Chapter IASA. Statutory Update. Statement Update Risk-Based Capital Other NAIC Stuff

PBA DON T YOU JUST LOVE IT!

Mortality Table Development Update 2014 VBT/CSO

MEETING MATERIALS PACKET Supplemental Materials

NAIC Bulletin Highlights of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners meeting

General Considerations

Mortality Table Update on the 2015 VBT/CSO

MEDAMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY. Address: 165 Court Street, Rochester, New York Series 11 Group Actuarial Memorandum.

CHAPTER 84b. ACTUARIAL OPINION AND MEMORANDUM

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE DIVISION OF INSURANCE

Life Principle-Based Reserves (PBR) Under VM-20

Session 118 PD - VM-20 Impact on Product Development: Research Study Phase 2. Moderator: Kelly J. Rabin, FSA, MAAA

The New Risk-Based Capital

NAIC Fall Meeting. Issues & Trends. December kpmg.com/us/frv

Session 10, AG 48 and Beyond: What Does the Future Hold for Captive Reinsurance in the PBR Era? Moderator: Russell B.

US Life Insurer Stress Testing

REQUEST FOR MODEL LAW DEVELOPMENT

Report on Principles-Based Reserves for Participating Whole Life From the American Academy of Actuaries Life Reserves Work Group Modeling Team

Original SSAP and Current Authoritative Guidance: SSAP No. 52

A statement that the policy design and coverage provided have been reviewed and taken into consideration;

Proposed Revisions to Model 641 July 18, 2013 Draft (as discussed by Senior Issues (B) Task Force at Interim Meeting on June 11, 2013)

Session 46, Streamlining Actuarial Reporting. Moderator: Thomas A. Campbell, FSA, MAAA, CERA

Product Development News

Session 16 PD, Principle-Based Reserves and Taxation. Moderator: Cindy D. Barnard, FSA, MAAA

Transcription:

Mike Boerner, ASA, MAAA, Director Actuarial Office Financial Regulation Division, Texas Department of Insurance Chair: NAIC Life Actuarial (A) Task Force (LATF) NAIC Valuation Analysis (E) Working Group NAIC PBR Review (EX) Working Group

Reminders for Year-End 2017 Valuation Manual (VM) Reserve & Actuarial Opinion Requirements Texas Single State Exemptions Actuarial Guideline 51 (aka - AG LTC) Net Premium Reserve (NPR) Clarification for 2017 AG 48 AG 38 Changes to Sections 8D & 8E Amendments for 2018 & Texas Adoption Status of VM Changes VM-22 Maximum Valuation Interest Rates Quicker Access to Updates for Designated Tables VM Section I VM-31 Phase 1 & 2 Life PBR Exemption VM-25 Health Reserves VM NPR Clarification for Model 787 Possible Future Changes Guaranteed Issue Mortality Table PBR Mortality Guidance Qualified Actuary in VM VM-31 Phase 3 Experience Reporting Other Status

VM requirements have been in place beginning 1/1/17. Texas adopted VM in Texas Administrative Code (TAC) 3.9901. VM provides reserve requirements for policies issued on and after 1/1/17. VM also provides actuarial opinion and memorandum requirements: Companies who file the life / fraternal blank follow VM-30 requirements. This includes requirements for change in appointed actuary. Companies who file the P&C or health blank follow those blanks instructions for the actuarial opinion.

Texas Insurance Code (TIC) 425.077 provides for a single state exemption from principle-based reserves. TAC 3.9902 provides details for this and also provides for a single state exemption from asset adequacy analysis in the actuarial opinion. A single state company is a domestic company that is licensed and doing business only in this state. A domestic company is doing business only in this state if the company does not have direct or assumed risks for policies issued outside of this state. TAC 3.9902 provides the requirements to file for either exemption and also provides how the commissioner may subsequently revoke an exemption.

Applies to a company with over 10,000 inforce lives covered by LTC contracts as of the valuation date. Authority follows from Section 1, paragraph 3, of VM-30 of the Valuation Manual. Requires asset adequacy analysis specific to all inforce LTC business without consideration of results for other blocks of business. If cash flow testing is used for both the LTC business and all significant blocks of non-ltc business then any reserve deficiency from the LTC business may be aggregated with sufficiencies from the non-ltc blocks. Any reserve deficiencies from the LTC blocks which are not offset by non-ltc sufficiencies must be set up. If non-cash flow testing is used (such as a gross premium valuation) then any additional reserves needed must be set up without regard to non-ltc blocks of business.

The analysis shall only anticipate premium rate increases based on a rate increase plan that is documented, supported by and approved by management. Required documentation is to be incorporated as a separate section of the VM-30 Actuarial Memorandum or as a special Actuarial Memorandum and shall be submitted to the state of domicile commissioner. Documentation includes Mortality and morbidity assumptions including support for these assumptions. Any rate increases already approved along with approved implementation timelines. Assumptions on future rate increases must be documented by policy form or policy groupings. Any other material assumptions with support along with documentation for assumptions that have changed significantly from the prior year s analysis.

For year-end 2017 a clarification was provided in AG 48 that the 2017 CSO mortality table is to be used for all issues subject to AG 48 in the calculation of the NPR for the Actuarial Method. While this was clear in the AG 48 for year-end 2016 it was not as clear in the AG 48 for year-end 2017 after it was modified to better follow the language in the NAIC Term and Universal Life Insurance Reserve Financing Model Regulation (Model 787).

Amendments were adopted to AG 38 Sections 8D and 8E. Amendments to both of these sections coordinate with the Valuation Manual. Section 8D was amended to apply the VM applicable on the valuation date versus prior language which used the VM with any amendments adopted by the NAIC as of the 7/1 preceding the valuation date. Section 8E was amended to exclude any ULSG business for which VM-20 is applied for the minimum reserve standard.

Texas is pursuing adoption of 2018 VM changes via updates to TAC 3.9901. Texas exposed the updated rule for comment. The exposure period ended on November 13 th. The commissioner will review comments received in considering adoption of this rule. Adoption of 2018 VM changes includes those summarized on the next few slides. Other VM changes not summarized on the next few slide are predominantly technical clarifications.

Beginning 1/1/18 VM-22 provides the maximum valuation interest rates for single premium immediate annuities and other similar contracts or supplementary contracts. The process for deriving the maximum valuation interest rates is provided in VM-22. This process was developed to provide valuation interest rates that are more responsive to the economic environment. The NAIC will apply this process and post the maximum valuation interest rates on the industry tab of the NAIC website in order for companies to access these rates. Companies will only need to follow the VM-22 requirements to know which of the posted maximum valuation interest rates to use for their products. Subsequent slides will provide more detail on the scope and the maximum valuation interest rates to be used.

Scope: The following categories of annuities or contract features, whether group or individual, directly written or assumed, including both life contingent and term certain only contracts: Immediate annuity contracts; Deferred income annuity contracts; Structured settlements in payout or deferred status; Payout annuities from settlement options or annuitizations from other contracts Supplementary contracts; and Contracts containing other similar fixed income payment streams, including those attributable to contingent deferred annuities and guaranteed lifetime income benefits once the underlying contract funds are exhausted.

Jumbo contracts are those with an initial consideration equal to or greater than $250 million. These contracts use a specific day maximum valuation interest rate where these rates will be published daily on the industry tab of the NAIC website. Non-Jumbo contracts are those that do not meet the definition of the Jumbo contract. Non-jumbo contracts will use a maximum valuation interest rate that is published quarterly by the NAIC. The NAIC will publish the maximum valuation interest rate for non-jumbo contracts by the 5 th business day following the end of each quarter. The NAIC will publish the maximum valuation interest rate for jumbo contracts daily on the next business day.

To select the appropriate maximum valuation interest rate from the published tables a company will need to know the Premium Determination Date to determine the Reference Period. The Premium Determination Date is the date the premium is determined by the insurance company and is committed to by the client. This term is generally defined as the issue date. For supplementary contracts and annuitizations, this would normally be the date of election of the supplementary contracts and the annuitizations. Additional guidance and an option with domestic commissioner approval to use the date of issue of the original contract is provided in VM-22. The Reference Period is the length of time rounded to the nearest year, from the Premium Determination Date to the date of the last non-life-contingent payment under the individual contract or group certificate, as applicable.

Companies will then use the Reference Period to find the appropriate maximum valuation interest from the tables published on the industry tab of the NAIC website.

VM Section I was amended to eliminate the required 14 day exposure period for updates to designated tables including the interest spread and default cost tables. This amendment provides quicker access to these tables which will be published on the industry tab of the NAIC website. This is significant for companies who are applying PBR in VM-20. Basis for this amendment is that updates to these tables pursuant to an adopted VM process do not constitute a change in the Valuation Manual that requires exposure.

For those applying PBR in VM-20 during 2018 the VM-31 PBR Actuarial Report has been streamlined in what is referred to as Phase 1 & 2. Part of the streamlining was based on input from companies in the 2016 PBR Pilot that the Overview Section contained information that was redundant with the rest of the report. An Executive Summary which minimizes the redundancy replaced the Overview Section. This Executive Summary is required to be submitted to the domiciliary commissioner by 4/1 and to other commissioners on request. The full report is to be submitted to any commissioner upon request. Other streamlining included standardizing the report format and adding section headers.

Formerly known as the Company Wide Exemption. Changes made to this exemption were responsive to concerns submitted and provide greater ability for the exemption to continue. These changes include: Removal of the requirement to meet an RBC level of at least 450% relative to the authorized control level for companies with less than $50 million of ordinary life premium as defined in this exemption. Commissioner discretion to allow the exemption to continue for up to two more years if the exemption is failed in those two years only due to not meeting the RBC 450% requirement.

Removal of preneed from the ordinary life premium volume. Removal from the ordinary life premium volume of any reserve transfer amount reported in Exhibit 1 as ordinary life premium where the reserve transfer is due to reinsurance assumed. Modification that any ULSG issued, either directly or assumed, on and after 1/1/20, and through the rest of the calendar year must meet the definition of a non-material ULSG. Clarification that the exemption applies to life insurance policies issued in the current calendar year that would otherwise be subject to VM-20. NOTE: This exemption is not needed until 2020 given the ability to use the three year transition in Section II of the VM.

VM-25 was amended to preserve the maximum valuation interest rate used for claim reserves on policies not requiring contract reserves. This rate had been based on the rate used in the valuation of single premium immediate annuities with an adjustment. However, given the requirements of VM-22 provide a change to the rate used for single premium immediate annuities this reference was replaced by detailed verbiage which continues the prior requirement.

Since VM-25 only applies to business issued on and after 1/1/17, states will have to use their own rulemaking or other process to apply VM-25 claim reserve requirements as appropriate for claims incurred on and after 1/1/17 under policies issued prior to 1/1/17. Texas is working on a rule to accomplish this that may be proposed and considered for adoption during 2018.

Similar to the clarification needed for the 2017 AG 48, the NAIC Term and Universal Life Insurance Reserve Financing Model Regulation (Model 787) also needed clarification that the 2017 CSO mortality table is to be used for the NPR in the Actuarial Method. This was accomplished in an innovative way without changing Model 787 by making a change in the VM. Section 3.C.1 in VM-20 was modified to make clear that the NPR will use the 2017 CSO for the Actuarial Method in Model 787.

Guaranteed Issue Mortality PBR Mortality Guidance Qualified Actuary in VM VM-31 Phase 3 Experience Reporting Other Status

The NAIC Life Actuarial (A) Task Force (LATF) discussed comments on an exposure of a Guaranteed Issue (GI) mortality table to be used for reserves and nonforfeiture. This included a definition of GI and the necessary amendment to implement this table in the VM. The amendment subjects GI business to VM-20 but allows GI term business to use the deterministic reserve exclusion test and use VM-A and VM-C for the NPR. The GI table, definition, and amendment to implement were provided by the Academy Life Experience Committee and SOA Preferred Mortality Oversight Group (Joint Committee).

The GI table is a five-year anti-select and ultimate table. The loaded ultimate table is to be used for reserves and nonforfeiture. Concerns were expressed over the GI mortality being more in line with direct marketed GI business versus agent solicited business which was understood to have higher mortality. The Joint Committee was requested to consider a recommendation to LATF to address this concern such as through an adjustment to the GI table. The amendment to implement the GI tables needed changes which are currently being addressed by the Joint Committee. LATF will have a future call to discuss and re-expose the updated amendment and to expose any recommendation from the Joint Committee to address the concerns regarding agent solicited business. The objective was to have the GI table available for use starting 1/1/19.

The LATF VM Review Drafting Group has discussed questions regarding VM PBR mortality requirements. A general question is whether there is enough clarity as to what mortality experience can be aggregated for the credibility percentage and the sufficient data period and what mortality experience cannot be aggregated. Related VM-20 cites include: 9C1a, 9C2d, 9C4b, and 9C6b(ii) The American Academy of Actuaries Life Reserve Work Group is also reviewing for any recommendations.

Qualified actuary is defined in the SVL as an individual who is qualified to sign the applicable statement of actuarial opinion in accordance with the American Academy of Actuaries qualification standards for actuaries signing such statement and who meets the requirements specified in the valuation. While this definition works well for the use of qualified actuary in VM-30 there are questions whether using qualified actuary in other sections of the VM like VM-G or VM-30 works as well. A basic question is whether duties of such actuary in VM-G or VM-30 necessitate that such actuary meet the qualification standards for signing the actuarial opinion or whether they should meet other standards. The American Academy of Actuaries subgroup called The Role of the Actuary, led by Arnold Dicke, is reviewing this question to provide any comments or any recommendations to LATF. This group is a subgroup of the Academy s PBR Governance Group.

Phase 3 will be less extensive than the Phase 1 & 2 changes. Additional information may be considered in the Executive Summary Clarification will be provided where needed and along with more precise, consistent, and less redundant language. Certain information such as identifying the Deterministic Reserve Method used may be added. Other Phase 3 work will include minimizing restatement of VM-20 requirements.

NAIC support had been working over a year in response to a charge to see if they could develop processes and systems to handle the reporting of experience data. NAIC support was able to do this and have provided demonstrations of this development to ACLI, the SOA, and a number of regulators. At the Summer 2017 NAIC meeting the NAIC Executive Committee voted to proceed with work to implement the role of the NAIC into VM-50. NAIC legal and other support drafted edits to VM-50 to reflect the NAIC role in the collection of experience data. These edits to VM-50 will go through the full open NAIC process for consideration. This begins with LATF discussion, exposure, and possible adoption of these edits.

Valuation Analysis (E) Working Group Economic Scenario Generator Informal Group Simplified Issue Mortality Table Accelerated Underwriting Data Elements VM-20, Section II, Riders & Supplemental Benefits