Understanding ASPE. Section 3840, Related Party Transactions

Similar documents
Understanding ASPE. Section 1506, Accounting Changes

Summary of ASPE 3840 Related Party Transactions

ASSURANCE AND ACCOUNTING ASPE - IFRS: A Comparison Related Party Transactions

Finding the capital you need to help your private business grow

IFRS adopted by the European Union. Based on International Financial Reporting Standards in issue at 22 December 2015

How well rehearsed are you for the public stage? Steps to consider before issuing an IPO

Tax Alert Canada Prince Edward Island budget

Financial Reporting Developments. Singapore Healthcare Management Congress 2012

IFRS 12. Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities

Tax Alert Canada. Manitoba budget Business tax measures. Corporate tax rates

We cannot continue to spend beyond our means, and we can no longer keep raising taxes on hardworking New Brunswickers.

Session 15PD: GAAP Hot Topics. Moderator: Presenters: Anne Potas

For overview of the key elements of the ESTMA, refer to our earlier Tax Alerts, and

ALI-ABA Audio Seminar. Moving from GAAP to IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) February 18, 2009 Telephone Seminar/Audio Webcast

Tax Alert Canada Nova Scotia budget

Tax Alert Canada. Alberta s Venture Capital Tax Credit. Overview

Not-for-profit. New criteria for recognition of intangible assets by a not-for-profit organization. Background. May 2010

UK launches review of corporate intangible fixed assets regime

Tax Alert Canada. Duty relief, duty drawback, and remission available for Canadian surtaxes on certain US originating goods.

Technical Line FASB final guidance

ACCOUNTING STANDARDS FOR PRIVATE ENTERPRISES (ASPE) UPDATE 2017

ISSUED. December December September ISSUED. September

Tax Alert Canada Saskatchewan budget

Ninth Annual International Tax Reporting Conference. Boston 7 May 2014

Tax Alert Canada. Investment income earned through a private corporation

Tax Alert Canada. Manitoba budget

Tax Alert Canada. Alberta budget

Tax Alert Canada Private company tax reform: Personal tax increases on noneligible dividends scheduled for 2018 and 2019

ASSURANCE AND ACCOUNTING ASPE - IFRS: A Comparison Joint Arrangements and Associates

New Accounting Standards and Interpretations for Tier 1 Public Sector and Not-for-Profit Public Benefit Entities

Tax Alert Canada Alberta budget

Adoption of new auditor s reports

Equity method investments

Accounting Standards for Private Enterprises (ASPE) Where are we now? Where are we going? December 9, 2015

EYGS UK tax strategy. Financial year ending 30 June 2017

1. Published International Financial Reporting Standards

Applying IFRS. Heading for Brexit. Accounting and reporting considerations of the UK s vote to leave the EU

Applying IFRS. IFRS 12 Example disclosures for interests in unconsolidated structured entities

EY Wealth Insights Canada

UK publishes response to consultation on corporate intangible fixed assets regime and draft legislation

Introduction to the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) March 2018

Cyprus Tax Authority issues guidance on revised transfer pricing framework for intra-group financing activities

New Accounting Standards and Interpretations for Tier 1 For-profit Entities. 31 March 2016

Denmark publishes draft bill to implement EU ATAD

Accounting Standards for Private Enterprises (ASPE) Briefing

Equity method investments and joint ventures

Tax Alert Canada. Changes to income tax VDP revised. Overview

ACCOUNTING STANDARDS FOR PRIVATE ENTERPRISES (ASPE) UPDATE 2014

ACCOUNTING STANDARDS FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS (ASNPO) UPDATE 2018

Tax Alert Canada Manitoba budget

Technical Line Financial reporting development

The NWMM includes the following business tax measures announced in the 2016 federal budget:

A fundamental consideration in virtually all Canadian private company sale transactions is whether the parties wish to structure the deal as either:

IFRS 9 for Financial Services Presentation and Disclosure. Ulana Oswald Senior Manager. December 9, 2015

IFRS adopted by the European Union

Revenue recognition in the asset management industry

IFRS adopted by the European Union

New accounting standards and interpretations. 31 December 2014

The proposal documents contained 137 pages of material and potentially represent a change in tax policy towards private companies.

New accounting standards and interpretations. 31 December 2015

Mauritius issues new rules on substance for GBL and other related changes

Tax Alert Canada. BC tables LNG income tax legislation. Introduction

Australia s proposed Diverted Profits Tax to affect many multinational businesses

Introduction to the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) program

IASB Projects A pocketbook guide. As at 31 December 2011

Technical Line FASB final guidance

New Accounting Standards and Interpretations for Public Benefit Entities. 31 March 2014

Tax Alert Canada. Federal Court of Appeal reaffirms the existence of common interest privilege outside a litigation context

ASPE Financial Statement Presentation and Disclosure Checklist

Canada amends taxation of investment income earned through a private corporation

Tax Alert Canada. Intra-group services and section 247 of the Income Tax Act

ISSUED. September ISSUED

OECD invites comments on discussion draft on treaty residence of pension funds

IASB Projects A pocketbook guide. As at 31 March 2013

Fraud Investigation & Dispute Services Corporate misconduct individual consequences

New accounting standards and interpretations. 30 June 2015

Over 21,000 individual submissions were made to the proposals, including some that were several hundred pages long.

Welcome news for the charitable sector in federal budget Donations related to the disposition of private corporation shares or real estate

Consolidated and other financial statements

A Roadmap to Accounting for Asset Acquisitions

New Accounting Standards and Interpretations for Tier 1 Public Sector and Notfor-Profit. Entities. 31 December 2016

Financial ratios: Lost in translation

At last, the omnibus technical bill (C-48) is enacted

Global Tax Alert. Canada Alberta increases corporate and personal income tax rates. Executive summary. Detailed discussion

New Accounting Standards and Interpretations for Tier 1 Public Sector and Not-for-Profit Public Benefit Entities

TEI School - Houston. Intangible Property ( IP ) - Basics in IP Planning. May 3, 2017

ASPE AT A GLANCE. Financial Statement Presentation

Tax Alert Canada. Changes to the large business simplified method and clarification for its application to expenses incurred before 1 January 2014

Good Group Private Enterprise Inc. Illustrative consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2016

IFRS 9 for Insurers. Syysseminaari. Aktuaaritoiminnan kehittämissäätiö. 30 November 2017

Tax Alert Canada. Ontario budget

Interested parties are invited to submit comments on the legislative proposals by 15 November 2016.

Equity method investments and joint ventures

Tax Alert Canada. FCA finds GAAR does not apply to post-acquisition PUC step-up planning: Univar Holdco Canada ULC v. The Queen, 2017 FCA 207

The following is a summary of the measures included in the 8 September 2017 GST/HST legislative proposals.

Canada: Yukon issues budget

Global Tax Alert. OECD issues updated guidance under BEPS Action 8 on transfer pricing aspects of intangibles. Executive summary

Family business characteristics in Slovenia

Bangladesh Transfer Pricing Regulations Finance Act, 2014

Ontario s Climate Change Action Plan: Implications for companies and government

Transcription:

Understanding ASPE Section 3840, Related Party Transactions

Four questions for private business owners: Related Party Transactions A better working world begins with asking better questions. Better questions lead to better answers. To help preparers of financial statements with Canadian accounting standards for private enterprises (ASPE) Section 3840, Related Party Transactions, we ve summarized the key aspects of the Section and offer relevant practical considerations for private mid-market companies through four commonly asked questions. Question 1What constitutes a related party? Typical examples of related parties of an entity encountered in practice include its shareholders, its ultimate shareholders, its directors, its management, its parent company, its subsidiaries (when non-consolidated financial statements are presented), entities in which it has a significant influence investment, a joint arrangement in which it has an interest, entities under common control and entities controlled by immediate family members of its shareholders or its ultimate shareholders. Paragraph 3840.04 describes the most commonly encountered related parties of a reporting entity, including: (a) An enterprise that directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the reporting enterprise (b) An individual who directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls the reporting enterprise (c) The other party, when an investment is accounted for by the equity method and the reporting enterprise is either the investor or the investee (d) Management: any person(s) having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the reporting enterprise (e) An individual having an ownership interest in the reporting enterprise that results in significant influence or joint control (f) Members of the immediate family of individuals described in (b), (d) and (e). (Immediate family comprises an individual s spouse and those dependent on either the individual or the individual s spouse.) (g) The other party, when a management contract or other management authority exists and the reporting enterprise is either the managing or managed party (h) Any party that is subject to significant influence, whether by reason of an ownership interest, management contract or other management authority, by another party that also has significant influence over the reporting enterprise (i) Any party that is subject to joint control by the reporting enterprise 2 Understanding ASPE Section 3840, Related Party Transactions

Question 2How is a business transferred between two enterprises under common control accounted for? A transaction resulting in a business transferred between two enterprises under common control is measured at the exchange amount or carrying amount depending on the circumstances. Paragraph 3840.29 states that when a monetary related party transaction or a non-monetary related transaction that has commercial substance is not in the normal course of operations, it shall be measured at the exchange amount when the change in ownership interests in the item transferred or the benefit of a service provided is substantive and the exchange amount is supported by independent evidence. if these criteria are not met, the transaction is measured at the carrying amount. The accounting for a business transferred between two enterprises under common control is described in paragraph 3840.44 and depends on whether the above criteria are met: When the criteria in paragraph 3840.29 are met, the business combination is accounted for in accordance with Section 1582, Business Combinations. Refer to the Understanding ASPE document on Section 1582 for guidance on the application of Section 1582. When the criteria discussed above in paragraph 3840.29 are not met, the appropriate accounting is as follows: The acquiring enterprise records the acquired assets and liabilities at their carrying amount in the balance sheet of the transferred business If appropriate, a non-controlling interest is recognized in accordance with Section 1602, Non-Controlling Interests. Any change in the non-controlling interest is recognized as an equity transaction in accordance with Section 1602 No previously unrecognized intangible assets or goodwill are recognized The financial statements of the combined enterprise reflect the earnings, assets and liabilities of the acquired enterprise for the entire period in which the transfer occurred and for all prior periods (but only since the date of acquisition of the business from an unrelated party) rather than only from the date of the transfer. Understanding ASPE Section 3840, Related Party Transactions 3

Question 3How is a related party transaction measured? Below is an illustrative decision tree from Section 3840 that can be used to determine the measurement basis of a related party transaction. Related party transaction occurs (Paragraph 3840.03 (h)) Is the transaction in the normal course of operations? (c) (Paragraphs 3840.24 3840.28) No Is the change in the ownership interests in the item transferred substantive? (Paragraphs 3840.32 3840.38) Is the amount of the exchange supported by independent evidence? (Paragraphs 3840.40 3840.42) Is the transaction a non-monetary exchange or transfer of a nonmonetary asset? (Paragraph 3840.18) No (e) No (e) Is the transaction an exchange of product or property held for sale in the normal course of operations to facilitate sales? (c) (Paragraph 3840.22) No No No Does the transaction have commercial substance? (d) (Paragraphs 3840.19 3840.20) Measure at the carrying amount (a) (f) Measure at the exchange amount (b) (a) Carrying amount The amount of an item transferred, or cost of services provided, as recorded in the accounts of the transferor, after adjustment, if any, for amortization or impairment in value. (Paragraph 3840.03(a)) (b) Exchange amount The amount of consideration paid or received as established and agreed to by related parties. (Paragraph 3840.03(b)) (c) Normal course of operations A related party transaction is in the normal course of operations when it is of a type that is usually, frequently or regularly undertaken by an enterprise for the purpose of generating revenue (d) Commercial substance A non-monetary related party transaction has commercial substance when the entity s future cash flows are expected to change significantly as a result of the transaction (e) Carrying amount is used for both monetary and non-monetary transactions in these circumstances (f) In rare circumstances, when the carrying amount of the item received is not available, a reasonable estimate of the carrying amount, based on the transferor s original cost, may be used to measure the exchange 4 Understanding ASPE Section 3840, Related Party Transactions

Question 4What are the disclosure requirements for related party transactions and balances? As noted in paragraph 3840.51, an enterprise shall disclose the following information about its transactions with related parties: (a) A description of the relationship between the transacting parties (b) A description of the transaction(s), including those for which no amount has been recognized (c) The recognized amount of the transactions classified by financial statement category (d) The measurement basis used (e) Amounts due to or from related parties and the terms and conditions relating thereto (f) Contractual obligations with related parties, separate from other contractual obligations (g) Contingencies involving related parties, separate from other contingencies Paragraphs 3840.52 3840.60 provide additional clarification on the disclosure requirements above. To learn more about these items or for application guidance, please contact our Private Client Services practice at privatecompanyinfo@ca.ey.com. Understanding ASPE Section 3840, Related Party Transactions 5

6 Understanding ASPE Section 3840, Related Party Transactions

Understanding ASPE Section 3840, Related Party Transactions 7

EY Assurance Tax Transactions Advisory About EY EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities. EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com/ca. 2017 Ernst & Young LLP. All Rights Reserved. A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited. 2209202 ED None This publication contains information in summary form, current as of the date of publication, and is intended for general guidance only. It should not be regarded as comprehensive or a substitute for professional advice. Before taking any particular course of action, contact Ernst & Young or another professional advisor to discuss these matters in the context of your particular circumstances. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage occasioned by your reliance on information contained in this publication. ey.com/ca