IRS Issues Three More Favorable Section 199 Letter Rulings to Pooling Cooperatives

Similar documents
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF FARMER COOPERATIVES

LTA Memo February 25, LLC s Purchases of Grain from Cooperative Members Are Not PURPIMs, IRS Concludes

2011Farmers Cooperative Conference Meeting Competitive Challenges: Cooperative Structure and Finance for the Future

National Council of Farmers Cooperatives. Legal, Tax & Accounting Committee. Revenue Recognition Working Group. Tax Considerations Listing

ABA Tax Section Meeting January 9, 2009, New Orleans, LA

Internal Revenue Service

Internal Revenue Service Number: Release Date: 3/2/2007 Index Number:

The Domestic Production Activities Deduction: Survey of Compiled Guidance

Understanding Nonqualified Distributions. Under the cooperative business model there are many ways to distribute net income or net

Internal Revenue Service

Internal Revenue Service

Private Letter Ruling IRC Section 42

Regulatory and Tax Update

Section Income Attributable to Domestic Production Activities

Internal Revenue Service

Before you sell Understanding the tax impact of sales to cooperatives

IRS LETTER RULING SAYS TREASURY S 1099C NOT TAXABLE

allowed certain exemptions not afforded investorowned for profit business. COOPERATIVE TAXATION A NEW PROVISION

Private Letter Ruling , 2/05/2010, IRC Sec(s) Accounting methods- last- in, first- out inventory method-elections-extensions.

DIVISION T REVENUE PROVISIONS

Canadian RRSPs, RRIFs and Other Foreign Funded Retirement Plans: Tax Planning and Reporting for 402(b) and Other Funded Plans

Part III - Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous. Payment of Employment Taxes with Respect to Disregarded Entities

Date: November 20, Refer Reply To: CC:IT&A:5 - PLR In Re: * * *

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 1111 Constitution Ave, NW Washington, DC Washington, DC Constitution Ave, NW Internal Revenue Service

By Electronic Delivery

Internal Revenue Code Section 199(c)(4) Income attributable to domestic production activities

Internal Revenue Code Section 199A(a) Qualified Business Income

REG Dollar-Value LIFO Regulations: Inventory Price Index Computation (IPIC) Method Pool

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 1111 Constitution Ave, NW Washington, DC Washington, DC 20224

Private Letter Ruling , IRC Section 42. UIL No Headnote: Reference(s): Code Sec. 42;

For Administrative Use Only

IRC 199 Qualified Domestic Production Deduction

Attention: See IRS Publications 1141, 1167, 1179 and other IRS resources for information about printing these tax forms.

In-depth Look at 199A & the Case for Non-Qualified Patronage After Tax Reform

Private Letter Ruling Designated Settlement Funds

NOL - NOL Impairment Cost Benefit Analysis. Is contained in the following 3 pages. itm

Internal Revenue Service

IRC 199 Qualified Domestic Production

lated FSCs from property acquired by the FSCs from the corporation. 6 However, this aggregate amount does not include any

Case 1:08-mc PLF Document 379 Filed 08/19/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

This notice provides guidance on the effective date of the $2,500 limit (as

January 29, RE: Request for Immediate Guidance Regarding Pub. L. No Dear Messrs. Kautter and Paul:

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION MINNESOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS

May 22, Re: Transition Relief for New Requirements on 2013 Form 1099-R

BY-LAWS OF AURORA COOPERATIVE ELEVATOR COMPANY AURORA, NEBRASKA. ARTICLE I Standards of Operations. ARTICLE II Stockholders

IRS Issues Notice of proposed ruling on self-employment tax treatment of CRP payments - Suggested outline for comments now available

26 CFR : Changes in accounting periods and in methods of accounting. (Also Part 1, 481)

Impact of Tax Reform on Agricultural Cooperatives

BAUCUS-GRASSLEY BILL ADDRESSES PUBLICLY TRADED PARTNERSHIPS Senators seek to clarify tax treatment for partnerships acting as corporations

Private Letter Ruling , 07/13/2007, IRC Sec(s). 1031

June 5, Mr. Daniel I. Werfel Acting Commissioner Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, Room 3000 Washington, DC 20024

March 9, RE Recommendations for Guidance on Opportunity Zones. Dear Mr. Dinwiddie:

Final Report. The Economic Impact and Tax Revenue Impact of Nebraska Supply/Marketing and Regional Cooperatives

PRIVATE RULING atty fees to class counsel.txt PRIVATE RULING PRIVATE RULING

Journal of Cooperatives

Excerpt from the Bylaws Regarding Capitalization. Capitalization Bylaws

Re: Recommendations for Priority Guidance Plan (Notice )

Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C Attn: CC:DOM:CORP:R (REG ), Room 5228.

An Analysis of the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010

Revenue Procedure , Changes in Methods of Accounting

B = C = Distributing 1 = Distributing 2 = Controlled 1 = Controlled 2 =

Employer B is a political subdivision of State A. Employer B maintains the DC Plan, a

Tax Exempt & Government Entities Division Internal Revenue Service Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C Washington, D.C.

American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 Changes the Rules for Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

PLR ; 2004 PLR LEXIS 747

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 1111 Constitution Ave, NW Washington, DC Washington, DC 20224

THE RANDALL FARMERS COOPERATIVE UNION Randall, Kansas

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY ,NTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, O.C

This is in reply to your request for a ruling concerning the income tax treatment of pension benefits received from C.

1111 Constitution Avenue, NW 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC Washington, DC 20224

Could Someone Please Tell the IRS to Follow the Law - IRS Notice : A Critique.

Article from: Taxing Times. October 2013 Volume 9, Issue 3

Reducing Taxes for Farmers, Growers, Fishermen and Related Industries

DRAFT AS OF January 7, 2019

Starting this year, the domestic manufacturing deduction increases to 9% of income from eligible activities.

AgCountry Farm Credit Services, ACA Capitalization Bylaws

Notice I. Overview and Purpose

A. Cash Position - Regulatory Authority to Determine Cash Positions and Non-Cash Positions and Relevant Examples

fj) IRS Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC Dear

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/10/ :31 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 745 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/10/2018 EXHIBIT B

SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations relating to the exclusion from

July 9, Dear Mr. Keyso:

Comments Concerning the Definition of Specialized Service Trade or Business under the IRC Section 199A Proposed Treasury Regulations

January 21, DOCS-# v5

Domestic Production Activities Deduction Chapter 7 pp National Income Tax Workbook

For Administrative Use Only

Impact of Tax Reform on Agricultural Cooperatives

X is also a partner in a holding limited partnership (HLP) formed in D1. X is the general partner and A, an officer of X, is the limited partner.

2018 AMTI, Alternative Minimum Tax

Partnerships; Start-up Expenditures; Organization and Syndication Fees. SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations concerning the

Designated settlement funds escrow accounts, trusts, and funds used in deferred like-kind exchanges; loans to exchange facilitators.

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C

Internal Revenue Service

POLICY FOR THE REDEMPTION OF CHS Inc. EQUITIES EFFECTIVE AS OF September 1, 2015

Estate and Gift Taxes; Difference in the Basic Exclusion Amount. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and notification of public hearing.

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY 25, 2018

Is a noncorporate limited partner s distributive share of partnership interest

SECULAR TRUST ***** Sample Document - Page 1 of 12

2014 ANNUAL COOPERATIVE BUSINESS SURVEY

"This document may not be used or cited as precedent. Section 6110(j)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code,"

Transcription:

Legal-Tax-Accounting Memorandum NATIONAL COUNCIL OF FARMER COOPERATIVES 50 F STREET, NW SUITE 900 WASHINGTON, DC 20001 202-626-8700 fax 202-626-8722 www.ncfc.org LTA Memo 2008-6 October 28, 2008 IRS Issues Three More Favorable Section 199 Letter Rulings to Pooling Cooperatives As anticipated, the IRS has issued additional favorable private letter rulings to pooling cooperatives, concluding that the cooperatives may add back per-unit retains paid in money (PURPIMs) when calculating the Section 199 deduction. These rulings follow on the heels of PLR 200838011, a similar ruling dated June 18, 2008. (See LTA Memo 2008-4.) Private letter rulings may not be cited as precedent; however, the rulings provide some certainty for taxpayers concerned about the treatment of advance payments for purposes of the Section 199 deduction. All four of the rulings contain nearly identical reasoning and conclusions by the IRS. Specifically, in determining that the cooperatives advance payments are PURPIMs qualifying for the add-back treatment for purposes of the Section 199 deduction calculation, the IRS noted the following in each ruling: Section 199(d)(3) of the Code allows certain payments from the cooperative to its patrons to be added back for purposes of computing the section 199 amount. Coop should include all net proceeds payments or allocations, including the [advance payment] and patronage dividend, in its computation of the section 199 amount. Specifically, the [advance payment] is considered a per-unit retain paid in money under section 1382(b)(3). The Section 199 deduction for domestic production activities income was enacted as part of The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. The deduction replaced the exclusion for Extraterritorial Income with a phased-in 9 percent deduction for domestic production income. The deduction applies to proceeds from agricultural or horticultural products that are manufactured, produced, grown, or extracted by cooperatives, or that are marketed through cooperatives. Agricultural or horticultural products include fertilizer, diesel fuel, and other supplies manufactured, produced, grown, or extracted by cooperatives. The deduction is limited to 50 percent of the W-2 wages paid by the taxpayer during the calendar year that ends in the taxable year. The phased-in deduction amount, currently at 6 percent, will increase to 9 percent in 2010. The full text of Private Letter Ruling 200843015 (July 21, 2008) is attached. The other rulings are PLR 200843016 (July 21, 2008) and PLR 200843023 (July 24, 2008). Other Rulings The Service recently ruled that gain realized by a cooperative from the sale of a building may be distributed as patronage to the cooperative s members, PLR 200842011 (July 11, 2008). Also of note, the IRS has issued a denial of Section 521 exempt status to an entity formed as a brine shrimp farmers cooperative. The Service concluded that harvesting of brine shrimp cysts is not a farming activity, LTR 200841038 (July 15, 2008).

Internal Revenue Service Number: 200843015 Release Date: 10/24/2008 Index Number: 1382.00-00, 199.06-00 -------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- -------------------------- Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224 [Third Party Communication: Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY] Person To Contact: ----------------------------, ID No. ------------- Telephone Number: --------------------- Refer Reply To: CC:PSI:B05 PLR-114225-08 Date: July 21, 2008 LEGEND: Coop = ----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- State A = -------------- States = ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- b = ------ c = ------ Dear -------------: This is in response to a request for ruling dated March 19, 2008, submitted by your authorized representative. The ruling concerns the interplay of the rules in subchapter T of the Internal Revenue Code (concerning the taxation of cooperatives and their patrons) and the calculation of the section 199 deduction for certain cooperatives contained in section 199(d)(3). Coop is a nonexempt agricultural cooperative corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State A. Coop operates in accordance with its bylaws to process and market b products for the b farmer members of Coop. The members of Coop are b farmers in States who deliver their c to Coop. Coop processes the c into a variety of

PLR-114225-08 2 products and then markets those products. Coop has a December 31 year end. At the end of each year, Coop computes its net proceeds and distributes the patronage income to its members. The Coop s bylaws clearly state that the cooperative must distribute the net proceeds, but like many other c cooperatives around the country, Coop have capitalized a portion of the net proceeds, known as the c Check, into inventory. All member b products received by the cooperative are mingled with other members products and pooled. The duration of the pools will be Coop s fiscal year unless Coop chooses another period. Coop has consistently used an annual pool beginning on January 1 and ending on December 31. Bylaw 9.01(c) defines the net proceeds of the cooperative as the amount remaining after reducing the gross receipts from patronage by the deductions specified in 9.01(b) of the bylaws. 9.01(b) defines deductions from gross receipts from patronage as 1) all necessary marketing expenses, 2) the actual cost of supplies, commodities, equipment, and other property procured for patrons, 3) the actual cost of services performed for patrons, and 4) amounts attributable to gross receipts from patronage of taxes, other than taxes based on income, all other necessary expenses, and reasonable and necessary additions to reserves for depreciation, for depletion, for obsolescence of physical property, for doubtful accounts, and for other valuation reserves, all established and computed in accordance with usual and customary accounting practices. None of the payments to the members are included in the net proceeds computation. 9.01(c) of the bylaws also provides the net proceeds from patronage shall be distributed to patrons of the cooperative, subject only to the deductions therefrom and the exceptions thereto provided in 9.04 of the bylaws. 9.04(b) of the bylaws sets the pre-existing legal obligations of the cooperative to pay the members their proportionate share of the net proceeds derived from patronage sourced income based on their respective patronage for that year. Coop makes payments to its patrons each year based on the patrons patronage sourced net proceeds computed on a book basis. Because c is delivered daily throughout the year, the member receives one or more advances following delivery and acceptance of the member s c. Coop has historically made payments to the members on or about the 17 th and 26 th of each month for these advances. These payments are also known as the c Checks. Coop references several pricing mechanisms to determine the c Checks. This advance amount keeps the cooperative competitive with non-cooperative c processors. But as the bylaws clearly state, this amount is merely an advance on the ultimate net proceeds due to the member. At the end of the year, Coop distributes the remaining amount of net proceeds to the patrons. As will be discussed below, for federal tax purposes, the advance payments, or c Checks, are considered advances on the net proceeds and treated as per-unit retains paid in money. The final payment is made after the audited financial

PLR-114225-08 3 statements are complete for the remaining amount of the actual net proceeds for the c marketed during the underlying fiscal year. The final payment is considered a patronage dividend for federal income tax purposes, and there is a requirement that at least 20 percent of the patronage dividend be paid in cash and the remainder in qualified written notices of allocation for the full amount to be deductible by the Coop and includible in the income of the patrons. Coop operates, as many marketing cooperatives around the country do, as a pooling cooperative. In general, a pooling cooperative is a marketing cooperative that segregates the patronage product received during the year into a pool. A pool opens as deliveries of a product are made, and closes after all, or substantially all, of the product is sold or disposed of. In some cases, a cooperative will leave the pool open into the next year, called the open pool method. In other cases where sufficient information is available, the cooperative will close the pool at its year end and sell the remaining patronage product in inventory forward to the next year s pool at the product s value determined at the lower of cost or market, called the closed pool method. The cooperative distributes the net proceeds from the sale of each pool to the patrons generally in proportion to the volume of the commodity delivered to the pool. Pooling is essentially a risk sharing device. Rather than each patron separately selling his or her product for a market price at the time of delivery, all patrons commingle their product and share the revenues and expenses of processing and selling. In effect, each producer receives an average price. Coop s pooling arrangement is such that a separate pool is opened with each fiscal year. Coop is using the closed pool method in its financial statement and tax return accounting. Coop has always capitalized into inventory the c Check payments. Thus, the ending inventory includes the capitalized c Check amount adjusted for the lower of cost or market. Effectively the cooperative is selling inventory forward to the next year and measuring its year end profit at the lower of cost or market (LCM). This means that the product on hand at the end of the year is sold forward to the next year s pool at the LCM and the next year s pool will get any benefit or cost of a difference between the LCM and the actual amount realized on the c products. Coop s financial statements reflect the c Check payments to members as part of the cost of goods sold of the cooperative and, therefore, only the final payment, or patronage dividend, is reflected as part of the net income. The presentation on the tax return is the same as the financial statements. Form 990-C (and the new Form 1120-C) requires the cooperative to report per-unit retains paid in money in Schedule A (cost of goods sold). As will be discussed below, this does not change the fact that the full amount of the c Check and patronage dividend are section 1382(b) payments and may be deducted on the income tax return and may be added back for purposes of computing the section 199 deduction.

PLR-114225-08 4 Nonexempt subchapter T cooperatives are permitted to exclude or deduct distributions to their patrons that qualify as patronage dividends or per-unit retain allocations, provided those distributions otherwise meet the requirements of subchapter T of the Code. Section 1388(f) of the Code defines the term per-unit retain allocation to mean any allocation, by an organization to which Part I of this subchapter applies, to a patron with respect to products marketed for him, the amount of which is fixed without reference to net earnings of the organization pursuant to an agreement between the organization and the patron. Per-unit retain allocations (PURs) may be made in money, property or certificates. Per-unit retain allocations paid in money (PURPIMs) and in property are excludable or deductible under section 1382(b)(3) of the Code. Per-unit retain allocations paid in certificates are deductible under section 1382(b)(3) if the certificates are qualified. If the certificates are nonqualified, the cooperative is permitted a deduction under 1382(b)(4) (or a tax benefit figured under section 1383) when the certificates are later redeemed. Section 1388(a)(1) of the Code provides that the term patronage dividend means an amount paid to a patron by a cooperative on the basis of the quantity or value of business done with or done for such patron. Section 1388(a)(2) provides that a patronage dividend is an amount paid under an obligation that must have existed before the cooperative received the amount so paid. Section 1388(a)(3) provides that patronage dividend means an amount paid to a patron that is determined by reference to the net earnings of the cooperative from business done with or for its patrons. That section further provides that a patronage dividend does not include any amount paid to a patron to the extent that such amount is out of earnings other than from business done with or for patrons. Section 1.1382-3(c)(2) of the Income Tax Regulations states that income derived from sources other than patronage means incidental income derived from sources not directly related to the marketing, purchasing, or service activities of the cooperative association. Section 1382(a) of the Code provides that except as provided in section 1382(b), the gross income of any cooperative shall be determined without any adjustment (as a reduction in gross receipts, an increase in cost of goods sold, or otherwise) by reason of any allocation or distribution to a patron out of net earnings or by reason of any amount paid to a patron as per-unit retain allocations. Section 1382(b)(1) of the Code provides, in part, that in determining the taxable income of a cooperative there shall not be taken into account amounts paid during the payment period for the taxable year as patronage dividends to the extent paid in money, qualified written notices of allocation, or other property with respect to patronage occurring during such taxable year.

PLR-114225-08 5 Section 1.1382-2(b)(1) provides, in part, that there is allowed as a deduction from the gross income of any cooperative to which part I of subchapter T applies, amounts paid to patrons during the payment period for the taxable year as patronage dividends with respect to patronage occurring during such taxable year, but only to the extent that such amounts are paid in money, qualified written notices of allocation, or other property (other than nonqualified written notices of allocation). Section 1388(d) of the Code defines the term nonqualified written notices of allocation as meaning a written notice of allocation other than a qualified written notice of allocation, or a qualified check that is not cashed on or before the 90 th day after the close of the payment period for the taxable year for which the distribution of which it is part is paid. Section 1382(b)(3) of the Code provides, in part, that in determining the taxable income of a cooperative there shall not be taken into account amounts paid during the payment period for the taxable year as per-unit retain allocations paid in money, other property, or qualified certificates with respect to marketing occurring during such taxable year. Section 1382(e) of the Code provides that for purposes of section 1382(b), in the case of a pooling arrangement for marketing products, the patronage shall be treated as occurring during the taxable year the pool closes, and the marketing of products shall be treated as occurring during any taxable years the pool is open. Though section 1382 of the Code is awkwardly drafted, the flush language of section 1382(b) clarifies what it means for an item not to be taken into account. It states that, for purposes of this title, a patronage dividend is treated as an item of gross income and as a deduction therefrom, and a per-unit retain allocation in money or qualified certificates are treated as a deduction in arriving at gross income. Section 1382(d) of the Code provides, in part, that the payment period for any taxable year is the period beginning with the first day of such taxable year and ending with the fifteenth day of the ninth month following the close of such year. Thus, per-unit retain allocations paid in money or qualified certificates are deductions in arriving at gross income if paid with respect to an open pool within the payment period for the taxable year. Because patronage dividends paid in money and qualified certificates are treated as deductions in arriving at gross income, Form 990-C (and new form 1120-C) requires such dividends to be reported on Schedule H as a deduction from gross income. Because a per-unit retain allocations paid in money or qualified certificates are treated as a deduction in arriving at gross income they are reported on Schedule A of the Form 990-C which represents the cooperative s cost of goods sold. This does not change the fact that Coop is allowed a full deduction under section 1382(b) of the Code for per-unit retains paid in money or qualified certificates.

PLR-114225-08 6 We note that to prevent a cooperative from deducting the per-unit retain allocations made in money or qualified certificates for the second time when the associated product is sold, the cost of goods sold mechanism associated with inventory must be adjusted to reflect the deductions allowable under subchapter T. Specifically, cooperatives need to include the PURs in inventory cost for purposes of making inventory and section 263A of the Code computations and then adjust the ending inventory and cost of goods sold to prevent double deduction of the PURs. The adjustments can be made to either the inventory or the line item deduction for the PURs. In other words, if the PURs are deducted on a deduction line in the cooperative's tax return, they should be removed entirely from the ending inventory and cost of goods sold computed for the tax year. Alternatively, if the PURs are not deducted on a deduction line in the tax return, the PURs reflected in the ending inventory should be removed and included in the cost of goods sold amount for that tax year. This procedure will allow the cooperative to deduct the PURs once while also preserving the integrity of its section 263A calculation. Under section 199(d)(3) of the Code, patrons that receive a qualified payment from a specified agricultural and horticultural cooperatives are allowed a deduction for an amount allocable to their portion of the qualified production activities income (QPAI) of the organization received as a qualified patronage dividend or per-unit retain allocation which is paid in qualified per-unit retain certificates. In particular, section 199(d)(3)(F) requires the cooperative to be engaged in the manufacturing, production, growth, or extracted (MPGE) in whole or significant part of any agricultural or horticultural product, or in the marketing of agricultural or horticultural products. Under section 199(d)(3)(D), in the case of a cooperative engaged in the marketing agricultural and horticultural products, the cooperative is treated as having MPGE in whole or significant part any qualifying production property marketed by the cooperative that its patrons have MPGE (this is known in the industry as the cooperative attribution rule ). In addition, section 199(d)(3)(A)(ii) requires the cooperative to designate the patron s portion of the income allocable to the QPAI of the organization in a written notice mailed by the cooperative to its patrons no later than the 15 th day of the ninth month following the close of the tax year. Under section 1.199-6(c), for purposes of determining a cooperative s section 199 deduction, the cooperative s QPAI and taxable income are computed without taking into account any deduction allowable under section 1382(b) or (c) of the Code (relating to patronage dividends, per-unit retain allocations, and nonpatronage distributions). An agricultural or horticultural cooperative is permitted to pass-through to its patrons all or any portion of its section 199 deduction for the year provided it does so in the manner and within the time limits set by section 199(d)(3) of the Code. When a cooperative passes-through all or any portion of the section 199 deduction, the cooperative remains entitled to claim the entire section 199 deduction of its return (provided that it does not create or increase a patronage tax loss), but is required under

PLR-114225-08 7 section 199(d)(3)(B) to reduce the deduction or exclusion it would otherwise claim under section 1382(b) for per-unit retain allocations and patronage dividends. Section 1.199-6(l) provides: No double counting. A qualified payment received by a patron of a cooperative is not taken into account by the patron for purposes of section 199. Section 1.199-6(e) defines the term qualified payment to mean any amount of a patronage dividend or per-unit retain allocation, as described in section 1385(a)(1) or (3) of the Code received by the patron from a cooperative, that is attributable to the portion of the cooperative s QPAI, for which the cooperative is allowed a section 199 deduction. For this purpose, patronage dividends and per-unit retain allocations include any advances on patronage and per-unit retains paid in money during the taxable year. Section 1.199-6(k) provides that the final regulations are the exclusive method for the cooperative and its patrons to compute the amount of the section 199 deduction. The effect of these sections is that the cooperative will compute the entire section 199 deduction at the cooperative level and that none of the distributions whether patronage dividends or per-unit retain allocations received from the cooperative will be eligible for section 199 in the patron s hands. That is, the patron may not count the qualified payment he receives from the cooperative in his own section 199 computation whether or not the cooperative keeps or passes through the section 199 deduction. Accordingly, the only way that a patron can claim a section 199 deduction for a qualified payment received from a cooperative is for the cooperative to pass-through the section 199 amount in accordance with the provisions of 199(d)(3) of the Code and the regulations thereunder. Coop s c Checks qualify as per-unit retain allocations within the meaning of section 1388(f) of the Code because they were distributed with respect to c that Coop markets for its patrons, and by the fact that the patrons receive the payments based on the quantity of c delivered; the c Checks are determined without reference to the Coop s net earnings; the c Checks were paid pursuant to a contract with the patrons establishing the necessary pre-existing agreement and obligation; and the c Checks were paid within the payment period of section 1382(d). Based on the foregoing, we rule as requested that: Section 199(d)(3) of the Code allows certain payments from the cooperative to its patrons to be added back for purposes of computing the section 199 amount. Coop should include all net proceeds payments or allocations, including the c Check and patronage dividend, in its computation of the section 199 amount. Specifically, the c Check is considered a per-unit retain paid in money under section 1382(b)(3).

PLR-114225-08 8 This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Under section 6110(k)(3) of the Code it may not be used or cited as precedent. In accordance with a power of attorney filed with the request, a copy of the ruling is being sent to your authorized representative. Sincerely yours, Paul F. Handleman Paul F. Handleman Chief, Branch 5 Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs & Special Industries) cc: