F U L L R E S E RV E S T U DY R E P O RT

Similar documents
Arizona Nevada Texas Utah New Mexico

Regarding: Level I Capital Replacement Reserve Study. We are pleased to submit this Level I Reserve Study for Summit Park Condominiums.

21289 E. Lords Way Queen Creek, AZ Tel: (480) Fax: (888) October 27, Sample Association

Sanctuary on the Park HOA Jordan & Caley Centennial, CO 80111

FULL RESERVE STUDY Stillwood Cluster Lot Owners' Association, Inc. Stow, Ohio August 15, 2017

CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY

VILLAGE AT LAKE CHELAN

FULL RESERVE STUDY Ameri-Cana Resorts Co-op, Inc. Rockledge, Florida April 13, 2017

Bridgewood Manor HOA

Full Reserve Study. The Ridge at Rock Creek Marysville, WA 11/13/2012

Estates at River Ranch HOA

Full Reserve Study. Fox Creek Farm HOA. Longmont. Report #: For Period Beginning: January 1, 2012 Expires: December 31, 2012

Full Reserve Study For Glenmoor Homeowners Association Conway, South Carolina

FLINT HILL MANOR FLINT HILL MANOR. Replacement Reserve Study. Oakton, Virginia. Property Management: Flint Hill Manor Townhouse Association

Full Reserve Study For Homeowners Association (HOA) At the Starlight Cove Community Located at Fairway Drive Boynton Beach, Florida 33437

PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY

The Ranches HOA. Level II Reserve Study. Report Period 1/01/08 12/31/08

National Reserve Study Standards

Reserve Specialist (RS ) Designation

THE VINEYARDS AT DUBLIN GREENE OWNERS ASSOCIATION

Update With Site Visit

CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY

Lakewood Ranch CDD 6

Your Homeowners Association

PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY

Reserve Study. Willow Lake Homeowner's Association, Inc.

DRAFT For Review SETTLERS POINTE LEXINGTON, SC. Prepared for: SETTLERS POINTE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. Prepared by:

Reserve Study Transmittal Letter

Indian Peaks Townhomes 95 th Street Lafayette, CO 80026

Calusa Point Association

Kayscreek Estates HOA

FULL RESERVE STUDY Woodridge Park Homeowners' Association, Ltd. Orchard Park, New York November 10, 2017

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2011 VILLAGE GREEN HOA. Ravenel Associates, Inc. Community Management by: Chad Hammond, Property Manager

505 South 336 th St., Ste 620 Calabasas, CA Federal Way, WA Regional Offices. Full Reserve Study. Grand Firs HOA. Graham, WA

Cottonwoods at Vine. Reserve Study. October 2012

Country Club Townhomes

East Town Village Townhomes

MILL CREEK CONDOMINIUMS RESERVE STUDY

CONTENTS. Twisted Creek Townhomes Holly Springs, NC

Revised FULL RESERVE STUDY. Falcon Ridge at Highland Creek Homeowners Association, Inc.

PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY

Parkwood HOA. Level 1 Reserve Study. Report Period 1/1/ /31/2012. Date of Property Inspection. Report prepared on Saturday, August 11, 2012

JULIAN POND KERNERSVILLE, NC. Prepared for: JULIAN POND HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION & CAS, INC. Prepared by:

GARDEN ESTATES MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATION ("CORPORATION")

Reserve Study Canyon Park Townhomes

LEVEL 2 RESERVE STUDY UPDATE POINTE WOODWORTH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION

Clearbrook HOA. Level 1 Reserve Study. Report Period 1/1/ /31/2010. Client Reference Number /23/2010 Prepared By

Central Pointe HOA. Level I Reserve Study. Report Period 1/01/08 12/31/08

Level 3 Reserve Study without a Site a Site Visit Visit

Reserve Study Transmittal Letter

2019 Reserve Study. Pebble Shores Condominium Association, Inc. Pebble Shores Drive Naples, FL A Service of:

Full Reserve Study. Kings Row HOA. Carbondale, CO. Report #: For Period Beginning: January 1, 2015 Expires: December 31, 2015

SURFSIDE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION RESERVE STUDY LEVEL III: UPDATE WITH NO VISUAL SITE INSPECTION 2016

FULL RESERVE STUDY. Belair at Carolina Lakes Homeowners Association, Inc. Fort Mill, South Carolina October 21, 2014

Village Glen HOA P.O. Box 1537, Arroyo Grande, CA. Reserve Study

Windsor at Westside Community Development District. Proposed Budget

PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY

August 19, Raintree HOA Attn: Emily Bresina HOA Simple PO Box Denver, CO Regarding: Reserve Study Draft.

Floriston Property HOA

Update With Site-Visit Reserve Study

REPLACEMENT RESERVE REPORT FY 2015 WOODBRIDGE CONDOMINIUM CHESAPEAKE BAY MANAGEMENT. Community Management by: Ms. Kimberly Marston

STORMWATER UTILITY FEE CREDIT MANUAL

DRAFT FOR BOARD REVIEW. Prepared for: SPARGER SPRINGS TOWNHOME OWNER S ASSOCIATION & ALLENTON MANAGEMENT. Prepared by:

What are Capital Reserves?

FULL RESERVE STUDY. Home Owners Association for Seale Subdivision Unit-1, Inc. San Antonio, Texas November 17, 2017

505 South 336 th St., Ste 620 Calabasas, CA Federal Way, WA Regional Offices. Full Reserve Study. Steven's Cove HOA.

CONTENTS. Sparger Springs Townhomes Durham, NC

Reserve Analysis Report

Paradise Island Condominium Association Final Report of the Reserve Study Review Committee

Sunland Division 7 Condo

Do-It-Yourself Reserve Study

RESERVE STUDY ANNUAL REPORT

Glengarry Condominium OA

Windsor at Westside Community Development District. Proposed Budget

FULL RESERVE STUDY FUNDING ANALYSIS PLAN Level I

CAPE GEORGE COLONY CLUB MARINA RESERVES

THE RETREAT AT RIVER PARK PLACE

Reserve Analysis Report

DUNN LORING VILLAGE SEQUOIA MANAGEMENT COMPANY. Craig Courtney Property Manager. Vienna, Virginia. Property Management: Consultant:

Baytree Community Development District

MVMCC CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) UPDATE AND ADOPTING A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MVMCC CAPITAL BUDGET ALLOCATION AMENDMENT

LEVEL 3 RESERVE STUDY UPDATE For IRONWOOD AT TUKWILA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

Depreciation Report Level I

Full Reserve Study. Twenty Four Neighborhood TOA. Carbondale, CO

CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY

"Full" Reserve Study. Wolf Creek Owners Association Longmont, CO

SOMERSET CREEK STANDARD LEVEL 3 RESERVE STUDY UPDATE WITHOUT A SITE VISIT. With funding recommendations for the 2019 fiscal year

RESERVE STUDY PRIVATE CLUBS and RECREATION CENTERS

HUDSON PARK ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION HUDSON, OHIO

CONTENTS. Greens at Lochmere Cary, NC

CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1

Full Reserve Study. Nelson Farms HOA. Fort Collins, CO. Report #: For Period Beginning: May 1, 2016 Expires: April 30, 2017

FOR BOARD REVIEW CARRBORO, NC. Prepared for: FENWAY PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. Prepared by:

VILLA SOL. Community Development District. Annual Operating and Debt Service Budget. Fiscal Year Version 2 - Approved Tentative Budget

CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY. Providence Corner. Upper Providence Twp.

PROFESSIONAL RESERVE STUDY

Scope Criterium Engineers was hired to update a reserve study for the Reston Association. The specific tasks included: Review the previous study perfo

FULL RESERVE STUDY FUNDING ANALYSIS PLAN Level I

Update With Site-Visit Reserve Study

Reserve Study Project No Prepared for Nelson Farm Homeowner Association 1771 Norwood Lane Fort Collins, Colorado

Transcription:

Office: (888) 927-7865 Fax: (813) 200-8448 Contact@customreserves.com 5470 E Busch Blvd., Unit 171 Tampa, FL 33617 Hawks Point Community Development District F U L L R E S E RV E S T U DY R E P O RT For 30-Year Projection Period Beginning January 1, 2017 This report contains intellectual property developed by Custom Reserves, LLC specific to this engagement and cannot be reproduced or distributed to those who conduct reserve studies without the written consent of Custom Reserves, LLC. See the proposal for details concerning the use of this report.

Table of Contents Property Overview... 3 Executive Summary... 4 Financial Analysis... 5 Property Component Inventory... 7 Reserve Expenses Appendix A Condition Assessment... 9 Photographs Appendix B Expense Chart and Comparison Graph... 12 Cash Flow Funding Plan Appendix C Terms and Definitions... 13 Disclosures and Limitations... 15 Credentials... 15 Page 2

PROPERTY OVERVIEW R U S K I N, F L L A T I T U D E : 2 7 4 3 ' 4 3. 5 2 " N L O N G I T U D E : 8 2 2 3 ' 5 7. 9 6 " W Page 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A site visit was conducted on May 4, 2017. There were 9 common area components identified that require reserve funding during the noninvasive, visual inspection of the community. Supplemental information to the physical inspection typically includes the following sources: 1. CDD board members, management and staff 2. Client s vendors 3. 4. Maintenance records of the reserve components where available 5. Project plans where available Hawks Point Community Development District (Hawks Point CDD) is a planned unit development located in Ruskin, Florida and is responsible for the common elements shared by 1058 property owners. The Hawks Point CDD infrastructure was built from 2008 through 2015. The development contains property site components. A Reserve Study comprises two parts: Physical Analysis Component Inventory Condition Assessment Estimated Useful Life Remaining Useful Life Replacement Cost Financial Analysis Fund Status Funding Plan The intention of the Reserve Study is to forecast the CDD's ability to repair or replace major components as they wear out in future years. This Reserve Study complies with or exceeds all applicable statutes and national standards. Page 4

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS This Reserve Study provides the 30-year cash flow analysis or pooling method to project and illustrate the reserve funding plan. The unaudited cash status of the reserve fund, as of March 31, 2017, as reported by Management and the Board is zero dollars. Hawks Point CDD did not budget for Reserves in the fiscal year FY 1 2017. The cash flow method of developing a reserve funding plan is where the reserve contributions are designed to offset the variable annual reserve expenses. Different reserve funding plans are tested against the anticipated schedule of reserve expenses until the desired adequate or sufficient funding goal is achieved. The cash flow recommended 2018 reserve contribution is $22,000. The CDD can then budget annual inflationary increases thereafter. The following table depicts the next 30 years of cash flow recommended contributions from Appendix C: Recommended Recommended Year Contribution Year Contribution 2018 $22,000 2033 $31,400 2019 $22,500 2034 $32,200 2020 $23,000 2035 $33,000 2021 $23,600 2036 $33,800 2022 $24,200 2037 $34,600 2023 $24,800 2038 $35,400 2024 $25,400 2039 $36,200 2025 $26,000 2040 $37,100 2026 $26,600 2041 $38,000 2027 $27,200 2042 $38,900 2028 $27,900 2043 $39,800 2029 $28,600 2044 $40,800 2030 $29,300 2045 $41,800 2031 $30,000 2046 $42,800 2032 $30,700 2047 $43,800 1 FY 2017 starts October 1, 2017 and ends September 30, 2017. Page 5

The funding goal of the cash flow analysis is to keep the reserve balance above a sufficient, not excessive threshold when reserves are needed the most due to one or more years of significant expenses. This threshold or risk year falls in 2018 and 2035 due to deferred maintenance and perimeter fences respectively. The age and long-lived components of the property are considered in the accumulated year 2047 ending reserves of $275,694. External market factors incorporated in this Reserve Study are an inflation rate of 2.4% based on the Consumer Price Index published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and interest rate of 0.5%. Most community bylaws provide that funds shall be held in a bank, with FDIC or similar insurance to cover all funds. The actual timing of the events depicted may not occur exactly as projected. However, items that are within a high degree of accuracy are measurements, pricing and interest on reserves. Internal changes such as deferred or accelerated projects, interest and inflation rates are likely. Updates to the Reserve Study incorporate these changes. To ensure equity in the adopted funding plan, ongoing annual Board reviews and an update of this Reserve Study with an on-site visit is recommended anywhere from two- to three-years depending on the complexity of the community and changes in external market factors. It is recommended by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) that your Reserve Study be updated annually. Page 6

PROPERTY COMPONENT INVENTORY The analysis began by separating the property components into specific areas of responsibility for replacement and repair. These classes of property are as follows: 1. Reserve Components are defined by the following: CDD responsibility Limited useful life expectancies Predictable remaining useful life expectancies Replacement cost above a minimum threshold 2. Long-Lived Components are defined as those items without predictable remaining useful life expectancies: Foundations Structural Frames 3. Operating Budget Components or money provided for repairs and replacements relating but not limited to: General maintenance to the common elements Expenses less than $10,000 Infrequent Replacements Landscape Other Repairs normally funded through the Operating Budget A contingency is intended to provide a hedge for unforeseen events. There is no set rule for the amount of contingency to be set aside other than the use of common sense based on experience. 4. Home Owner Components: Homes and Lots Townhomes (Association) 5. Other Property Components: Lift Station (County) Light Poles (Electric Company) Pipes, Subsurface Utilities, Water and Sewer (County) Streets (Association) Page 7

The following 11X17 spreadsheets depict the reserve components, quantities, useful lives projected costs and estimated times of replacements for the next 30 years in Appendix A with a narrative condition assessment to follow. Page 8

RESERVE EXPENSES Appendix A Page 1 of 2 Hawks Point Projected Inflation Rate 2.4% Community Development District Line Total Per 1st Year of Useful Remaining 2017 2017 Cost of Total Future Fiscal Item Reserve Component Cycle Phase Units Replacement Life Life Unit Replacement Costs of Year Quantity Quantity Years Years Cost per Phase Replacement 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 1 Fences, Aluminum 980 980 Linear Feet 2035 to 25 18 $25.00 $24,500 $37,546 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 Fences, Vinyl 2,840 2,840 Linear Feet 2035 20 to 25 18 $26.00 $73,840 $113,159 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 3 Irrigation System, Clocks 5 5 Each 2020 to 5 3 $1,200.00 $6,000 $53,066 $0 $0 $0 $6,442 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,254 $0 4 Irrigation System, Grounding, Phased 1 1 Allowance 2018 N/A 1 $7,500.00 $7,500 $15,544 $0 $7,680 $7,864 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5 Irrigation System, Well Stations 1 1 Allowance 2025 to 10 8 $33,000.00 $33,000 $154,575 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $39,895 $0 6 Perimeter Wall, Paint Applications 1,980 1,980 Linear Feet 2018 5 to 7 1 $6.00 $11,880 $87,133 $0 $12,165 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,362 $0 7 Ponds, Erosion Control, Partial 1 1 Allowance 2023 to 15 6 $50,000.00 $50,000 $139,921 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,646 $0 $0 $0 8 Signage, Phased 1 1 Allowance 2026 15 to 20 9 $10,000.00 $10,000 $46,676 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,379 9 Storm Water System, Partial 1 1 Allowance 2033 to 50 16 $30,000.00 $30,000 $43,845 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Reserve Study Update 1 1 Allowance 2019 2 to 3 2 $1,100.00 $1,100 $1,100 $1,100 Total Expenses $692,567 $0 $19,845 $8,964 $6,442 $0 $0 $57,646 $0 $61,510 $12,379 5/9/2017

RESERVE EXPENSES Hawks Point Community Development District Appendix A Page 2 of 2 Line Item Reserve Component 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 1 Fences, Aluminum $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $37,546 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 Fences, Vinyl $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $113,159 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 3 Irrigation System, Clocks $0 $0 $0 $8,167 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,195 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,353 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,656 $0 $0 4 Irrigation System, Grounding, Phased $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5 Irrigation System, Well Stations $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,572 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $64,108 $0 $0 6 Perimeter Wall, Paint Applications $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,956 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,018 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,633 $0 7 Ponds, Erosion Control, Partial $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $82,275 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 8 Signage, Phased $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,325 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,971 $0 $0 $0 9 Storm Water System, Partial $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $43,845 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Reserve Study Update Total Expenses $0 $0 $0 $8,167 $0 $16,956 $43,845 $0 $225,798 $0 $0 $82,275 $20,018 $10,353 $0 $0 $0 $18,971 $75,764 $23,633 $0 5/9/2017

CONDITION ASSESSMENT The condition assessment of this Full Reserve Study includes narratives that describe the reserve components, documents specific problems and conditions based on representative samples. 1. Fences, Aluminum The CDD maintains 980 linear feet of aluminum fences located around the entrances. The aluminum fences are original and in good condition. The finish on aluminum fences is relatively maintenance free. Aluminum fences have a useful life of up to 25 years. Hawks Point CDD should budget for replacements by 2035. 2. Fences, Vinyl The CDD maintains approximately 2,840 linear feet of vinyl fences located throughout the community. The fences are original and in good overall condition. As vinyl ages it becomes brittle and susceptible to damage. The useful life of vinyl fences is from 20- to 25-years. Hawks Point CDD should budget for replacements by 2035. The costs noted in the expense spreadsheet Appendix A include removal. 3. through 5. Irrigation System The CDD maintains an irrigation system. The irrigation system components include five clocks, five well stations, valves and piping. The system is mostly original and in fair to good overall reported condition. The system has a long useful life with the benefit of ongoing maintenance. This ongoing maintenance includes partial replacements as needed. The CDD should fund these minor partial replacements through the operating budget. The clocks have a useful life of up to five ears and the well stations have a useful life of up to 10 years. Hawks Point CDD should budget for replacement of the clocks every five years beginning by 2020 and the well stations by 2025 and every 10 years thereafter. The clocks need to be grounded in the near term per a conversation with the maintenance contractor. 6. Perimeter Wall, Paint Applications The CDD maintains approximately 1,980 linear feet of wall located at the north perimeter. Periodic applications of a protective paint finish or waterproof coating is essential in order to maintain the appearance and integrity of the wall. Page 9

The paint finishes are original and in fair overall condition. Paint finishes have a useful life from five- to seven-years. Hawks Point CDD should budget for the next paint finish application in 2018 and every seven years thereafter. 7. Ponds, Erosion Control The CDD maintains the ponds throughout the community. Hawks Point CDD utilizes a wet pond system. Wet ponds treat storm water runoff by utilizing sunlight and vegetation which breaks down, filters and cleanses pollutants. The system includes a series of pipes and drains throughout the property designed to carry storm water directly to the pond system for processing. The pond shorelines comprise 25,000 linear feet. The ponds are original and in good overall condition. Areas of shoreline erosion are noted. Page 3 of Appendix B depicts this condition in Figures 17 and 18. Shoreline erosion can be caused by a variety of natural factors including steep slopes, changes in water elevation and storm water runoff. Erosion can lead to partial dredging of the ponds particularly near the drainage inlet and outlet structures. Waterbodies of this type should utilize mapping and bathymetry to develop an effective management strategy by knowing the exact surface area, depths, structural locations and sediment accumulation. A bathymetric and sedimentation survey should be conducted every three- to five-years. State environmental officials urge a 10-foot buffer zone around ponds, where no pesticides, fertilizer, or other chemicals should be used, and native plants are left to flourish. That enables the plants to soak up nitrogen and phosphorus before too much flows to the lagoon or other fragile waters, where the two nutrients fuel fish-killing toxic algae blooms. Any native plants along the pond s littoral shelf should be left in place. Horticulture experts say to choose native plants or if they re already there, let them grow. The right plant in the right place can out-compete problem species such as cattails and torpedo grass that can clog up ponds. Native plants also provide cover for fish and habitat for tiny organisms that small fish eat to colonize. The plant roots also help hold the pond s banks in place. Page 10

Hawks Point CDD should budget for erosion control of up to five percent (5%) of the shorelines every 15 years or by 2023 and again by 2038 based on the age and condition of the ponds. The CDD should map the ponds and place marked stakes along the shorelines at multiple locations to monitor the effects of erosion. 8. Signage The CDD maintains monument signage located throughout the community entrances. The signage is original and in good condition overall. The signage has a useful life of 15- to 20-years. Signage is a discretionary item and the times of replacement can vary. Hawks Point should budget for phased replacements of up to fifty percent (50%) beginning by 2026 and every nine years therafter. 9. Storm Water System The storm water system comprises approximately 135 curb inlets and catch basins that collect storm water from the pavement. Storm water systems are so low maintenance that they are often overlooked. However, overlooking systems of this type leads to major problems. Over time, drain can become clogged with leaves and other debris. Maintenance of storm water systems is required in every municipality as a condition for use of the land to prevent adverse impacts on adjoining properties. Hawks Point CDD should routinely keep drains clear. The overall reported condition of the catch basins is good. The useful life of a storm water system varies up to 75 years. Achieving this useful life typically requires interim capital repairs or partial replacements. The CDD should anticipate occasional displacement of a catch basin and the surrounding pavement from erosion as time goes on. Erosion causes settlement of catch basins. The catch basin can shift and need replacement if left unrepaired. The CDD should plan to repair any displaced catch basins and partial pipe replacements as needed by 2033. The exact times and amount of capital repairs or replacements varies upon natural forces. The following Appendix B pictures depict the reserve components and specific conditions noted in the condition assessment. Page 11

1 Appendix B Figure 1 Aluminum Fence Figure 4 Vinyl Fence Figure 2 Aluminum Fence Figure 5 Vinyl Fence Figure 3 Vinyl Fence Figure 6 Irrigation Well Station

2 Appendix B Figure 7 Irrigation Well Station Figure 10 Irrigation Clock Figure 8 Irrigation Well Station Figure 11 Perimeter Wall Figure 9 Irrigation Well Station Figure 12 Perimeter Wall

3 Appendix B Figure 13 Road Depression at Sewer Line Figure 16 Pond Algae Figure 14 Pond Overview Figure 17 Pond Shoreline Erosion Figure 15 Pond Shoreline Plantings Figure 18 Pond Shoreline Erosion

4 Appendix B Figure 19 Crack in Pond Outlet Figure 20 Curb Inlet Concrete Spall Figure 21 Catch Basin

EXPENSE CHART AND COMPARISON GRAPH The Reserve Expenses reflect current and future local costs of replacements with anticipated inflation. The following chart illustrates the relative importance of the Reserve Expenses. Significance of Future Expenses Reserve Study Update 0.2% Storm Water System 27% Remaining Components 19% Fences 22% Irrigation System 32% The following graph depicts the next 30 years of Projected Expenses, Reserve Balances and cash flow Recommended Contributions: $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 Recommended Contributions Projected Expenses Reserve Balance $50,000 $0 Page 12

Appendix C Cash Flow Funding Plan or Pooling Method Hawks Point Community Development District FY 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Beginning of Year Reserves $0 $0 $2,155 $15,702 $32,338 $56,100 $80,581 $48,138 $73,779 $38,638 $53,051 $80,516 $108,819 $137,963 $159,787 $190,586 Recommended Reserve Contributions 0 22,000 22,500 23,000 23,600 24,200 24,800 25,400 26,000 26,600 27,200 27,900 28,600 29,300 30,000 30,700 Anticipated Interest Earned 0.5% 0 0 11 79 162 281 403 241 369 193 265 403 544 690 799 953 Projected Expenses 0 19,845 8,964 6,442 0 0 57,646 0 61,510 12,379 0 0 0 8,167 0 16,956 Projected Year End Reserves $0 $2,155 $15,702 $32,338 $56,100 $80,581 $48,138 $73,779 $38,638 $53,051 $80,516 $108,819 $137,963 $159,787 $190,586 $205,283 Threshold/ Risk Year 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 Beginning of Year Reserves $205,283 $193,864 $227,033 $35,370 $69,347 $104,294 $57,940 $74,412 $101,531 $140,039 $179,639 $220,337 $243,268 $210,520 $230,740 Recommended Reserve Contributions 31,400 32,200 33,000 33,800 34,600 35,400 36,200 37,100 38,000 38,900 39,800 40,800 41,800 42,800 43,800 Anticipated Interest Earned 0.5% 1,026 969 1,135 177 347 521 290 372 508 700 898 1,102 1,216 1,053 1,154 Projected Expenses 43,845 0 225,798 0 0 82,275 20,018 10,353 0 0 0 18,971 75,764 23,633 0 Projected Year End Reserves $193,864 $227,033 $35,370 $69,347 $104,294 $57,940 $74,412 $101,531 $140,039 $179,639 $220,337 $243,268 $210,520 $230,740 $275,694 Threshold/ Risk Year Notes: 1) FY 2017 Begins October 1, 2017 and Ends September 30, 2017 2) FY 2017 Beginning Reserve Balance as of: 3/31/2017 3) Interest Earned is compounded on the Beginning Year Reserve Balance, the first year is a partial amount earned 4) Taxes on the interest earned are considered negligible 5/9/2017

TERMS AND DEFINITIONS Cash Flow Method - A method of calculating Reserve contributions where contributions to the Reserve fund are designed to offset the variable annual expenditures from the Reserve fund. Different Reserve Funding Plans are tested against the anticipated schedule of Reserve expenses until the desired Funding Goal is achieved. Component - An individual line item in the Reserve Study developed or updated in the Physical Analysis. These elements form the building blocks of the Reserve Study. Components typically are: 1) Association responsibility, 2) with limited Useful Life expectancies, 3) predictable Remaining Useful Life expectancies, 4) above a minimum threshold cost, and 5) as required by local codes. Component Assessment and Valuation - The task of estimating Useful Life, Remaining Useful Life, and Repair or Replacement Costs for the Reserve components. This task is accomplished either with or without onsite visual observations, based on Level of Service selected by the client. Component Inventory - The task of selecting and quantifying Reserve Components. This task is accomplished through onsite visual observations, review of association design and organizational documents, and a review of established association precedents. Component Method - A method of calculating Reserve contributions where the total reserve contribution is based on the sum of contributions for individual components. Effective Age - The difference between Useful Life and Remaining Useful Life. Not always equivalent to chronological age, since some components age irregularly. Used primarily in computation. Financial Analysis - The portion of a Reserve Study where current status of the Reserves (measured as cash or Percent Funded) and a recommended Reserve contribution rate (Reserve Funding Plan) are derived. The Financial Analysis is one of the two parts of a Reserve Study. Fully Funded - 100% Funded. When the actual (or projected) Reserve balance is equal to the Fully Funded Balance. Fully Funded Balance (FFB) - Total Accrued Depreciation. An indicator against which Actual (or projected) Reserve balance can be compared. In essence, it is the Reserve balance that is proportional to the current Repair/replacement cost and the fraction of life used up. This number is calculated for each component, them summed together for an association total. Two formulae can be utilized, depending on the provider s sensitivity to interest and inflation effects. Note: both yield identical results when interest and inflation are equivalent. Funding Goals - Independent of methodology utilized, the following represent the basic categories of Funding Plan goals. Page 13

Baseline Funding - Establishing a Reserve funding goal of keeping the Reserve cash balance above zero. Fully Funding - Setting a Reserve funding goal of attaining and maintaining Reserves at or near 100% funded. Statutory Funding - Establishing a Reserve funding goal of setting aside the specific minimum amount of Reserves required by local statues. Threshold Funding - Establishing a Reserve funding goal of keeping the Reserve balance above a specified dollar or Percent Funded amount. Depending on the threshold this may be more or less conservative than Fully Funded. Funding Plan - An Association s plan to provide income to a Reserve fund to offset anticipated expenditures from that fund. Minimum Balance - A minimum Reserve balance established by the client. Physical Analysis - The portion of the Reserve Study where the Component inventory, Condition Assessment and Life Adjustment and Valuation tasks are performed. This represents one of the two parts of the Reserve Study. Remaining Useful Life (RUL) - Also referred to as Remaining Life (RL). The estimated time, in years, that a reserve component can be expected to continue to serve its intended function. Replacements anticipated to occur in the initial or base year have zero Remaining Useful Life. Reserve Assessments - The portion of assessments contributed to the Reserve Fund. Reserve Balance - Actual or projected funds as of a particular point in time that the association has identified for use to defray the future repair or replacement of those major components which the association is obligated to maintain. Also known as Reserves, Reserve Accounts, Cash Reserves. Special Assessment - An assessment levied on the members of an association in addition to regular assessments. Special Assessments are often regulated by Governing Documents or local statutes. Straight Line - A formula used to calculate the annual reserve fund contribution for a specific component. Projected replacement cost divided by the useful life equals the annual payment. Useful Life (UL) - Total Useful Life or Depreciable Life. The estimated time, in years, that a reserve component can be expected to serve its intended function in its present application or installation. Page 14

DISCLOSURES AND LIMITATIONS No destructive testing was performed. Latent defects in design or construction are excluded from this report. There are no material issues to our knowledge that have not been disclosed to the client that would affect the integrity of this Reserve Study report. Custom Reserves has no interests with the client other than this Reserve Study. Component quantities and estimates of costs indicated in this Report were developed by Custom Reserves unless otherwise noted in our Condition Assessment comments. The sources for the costs outlined in the study include experience, historical information and R.S. Means, Incorporated. This report should be used for budget and planning purposes only. CREDENTIALS PAUL GRIFONI Licensed Home Inspector EDUCATION - University of Massachusetts - Bachelor of Science in Engineering PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS / DESIGNATIONS Reserve Specialist (RS) - Community Associations Institute Professional Reserves Analyst (PRA) - Association of Professional Reserve Analysts Page 15