Memorandum. To: From:

Similar documents
Memorandum. 1. Introduction. To:

Exposure Draft. Actuarial Standards Board. June Document Ce document est disponible en français 2018 Actuarial Standards Board

Memorandum. INTRODUCTION According to subsection 3530 of the Standards of Practice: Demographic Assumptions

Development of New Prescribed Interest Rate Scenarios for CALM Valuations

Memorandum. Introduction. Background

Memorandum. Dean Stamp, Chair Designated Group, Equity Model Calibration Criteria

Memorandum. Introduction. Background

Investment Assumptions Used in the Valuation of Life and Health Insurance Contract Liabilities

Memorandum. According to subsection 3530 of the Standards of Practice: Demographic Assumptions

Calibration of Stochastic Risk-Free Interest Rate Models for Use in CALM Valuation

Exposure Draft. Revisions to Sections 3400 and 6400 of the Standards of Practice for Consistency with ISAP 3. Actuarial Standards Board.

Revised Exposure Draft

Memorandum. To: All Fellows, Affiliates, Associates, and Correspondents of the Canadian Institute of Actuaries and Other Interested Parties.

Memorandum. Introduction. Background. To:

Life Insurance Capital Adequacy Test (LICAT) and Capital Adequacy Requirements for Life and Health Insurance (CARLI)

Exposure Draft. Revision to the Standards of Practice to Incorporate Changes to Section 2500 Dynamic Capital Adequacy Testing

Exposure Draft. Amendments to Section 3500 of the Practice-Specific Standards for Pension Plans Pension Commuted Values. Actuarial Standards Board

Determination of Best Estimate Discount Rates for Going Concern Funding Valuations

Regulatory Capital Filing Certification

Exposure Draft. Revisions to the Practice-Specific Standards for Public Personal Injury Compensation Plans (Part 5000) (red-lined)

Exposure Draft. Actuarial Standards Board. August Document Ce document est disponible en français 2012 Canadian Institute of Actuaries

Final Standards. Final Standards Practice-Specific Standards for Insurance (Part 2000) Actuarial Standards Board. February 2017.

Second Revision Educational Note. Premium Liabilities. Committee on Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Reporting. July 2016.

Assumptions for Hypothetical Wind-Up and Solvency Valuations with Effective Dates Between December 31, 2011, and December 30, 2012

Re: Amendments to Section 3500 of the Practice-Specific Standards for Pension Plans Pension Commuted Values

Final Standards. Actuarial Standards Board. Mai Document Ce document est disponible en français 2014 Actuarial Standards Board

Use of Internal Models for Determining Required Capital for Segregated Fund Risks (LICAT)

Adopted by the Actuarial Standards Board September 2008 Updated March (Doc. No. 161)

GN47: Stochastic Modelling of Economic Risks in Life Insurance

Re.: International Standard of Actuarial Practice 1 General Actuarial Practice General Comments actuaries.ca / actuaires.ca

OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS LIFE MEMORANDUM TO THE APPOINTED ACTUARY

Memorandum. Final Standards Revisions to Subsection 3260 of the Practice-Specific Standards for Pension Plans Reporting: External User Report; Advice

February 8, Mr. Hans Hoogervorst, Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom

Evaluation of the Runoff of P&C Claim Liabilities when the Liabilities are Discounted in Accordance with Accepted Actuarial Practice

Actuary s Guide to Reporting on Insurers of Persons Policy Liabilities. Senior Direction, Supervision of Insurers and Control of Right to Practise

OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Revised Educational Note. Premium Liabilities. Committee on Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Reporting. March 2015.

Standards of Practice Practice-Specific Standards for Pension Plans

Canadian Institute of Actuaries Institut Canadien des Actuaires MEMORANDUM

May 2015 DISCUSSION DRAFT For Illustrative Purposes Only Content NOT Reviewed or Approved by the Actuarial Standards Board DISCUSSION DRAFT

Sensitivity Analysis to Illustrate the Effect of Adverse Deviations for Pension Plan Actuarial Valuations

Comparison of IFRS 17 to Current CIA Standards of Practice

Memorandum. To: From:

Events Occurring After the Calculation Date of an Actuarial Opinion for a Pension Plan

Report from the American Academy of Actuaries Economic Scenario Work Group

IFRS and the role of CIA Standards

Memorandum. Standards of Practice Practice-Specific Standards for Actuarial Evidence Paragraph Mortality Table Document

Educational Note. Discounting. Committee on Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Reporting. November Document

AFTERNOON SESSION. Date: Thursday, April 26, 2018 Time: 1:30 p.m. 3:45 p.m. INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES

International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) Public Consultation: Risk-based Global Insurance Capital Standard Version 2.

Syndicate SCR For 2019 Year of Account Instructions for Submission of the Lloyd s Capital Return and Methodology Document for Capital Setting

Syndicate SCR For 2019 Year of Account Instructions for Submission of the Lloyd s Capital Return and Methodology Document for Capital Setting

Canadian Institute of Actuaries Institut Canadien des Actuaires MEMORANDUM

Selection of Mortality Assumptions for Pension Plan Actuarial Valuations

POLICYHOLDER BEHAVIOR IN THE TAIL UL WITH SECONDARY GUARANTEE SURVEY 2012 RESULTS Survey Highlights

Implications of CICA Handbook Section 3855 Financial Instruments on Future Income and Alternative Taxes: Update to Fall Letter

Regulatory Capital Filing Certification

Draft Educational Note. Data Validation. Committee on Workers Compensation. December Document

Overview of Asset/Liability Process. City of Jacksonville Police & Fire Pension Fund

Duration Considerations for P&C Insurers

Canadian Institute of Actuaries Institut Canadien des Actuaires MEMORANDUM

EDUCATIONAL NOTE FUTURE INCOME AND ALTERNATIVE TAXES COMMITTEE ON LIFE INSURANCE FINANCIAL REPORTING

FINAL STANDARDS OF PRACTICE PRACTICE-SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR INSURERS SECTION 2300 LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE

Investment Symposium March F7: Investment Implications of a Principal-Based Approach to Capital. Moderator Ross Bowen

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Lombardi, Chapter 1, Overview of Valuation Requirements. A- 22 to A- 26

Life 2008 Spring Meeting June 16-18, Session 94, Impact of IFRS Insurance Accounting. Moderator Simon R. Curtis, FSA, FCIA, MAAA

DRAFT GUIDANCE DISCLOSURE OF ACTUARIAL MATTERS DISCLOSURE EXAMPLES COMMITTEE ON THE ROLE OF APPOINTED/VALUATION ACTUARY JANUARY 1996

Modeling Report On the Stochastic Exclusion Test. Presented by the American Academy of Actuaries Modeling Subgroup of the Life Reserves Work Group

Selection of Mortality Assumptions for Pension Plan Actuarial Valuations

Standardized Approach for Calculating the Solvency Buffer for Market Risk. Joint Committee of OSFI, AMF, and Assuris.

Re: Legislative and Regulatory Proposals Relating to the Goods and Services Tax/Harmonized Sales Tax

Percentiles One way to look at quartile points is to say that, for a sorted list of values, Q 1 is the value that has 25% of the rest of the values

The Actuarial Society of Hong Kong RISK ADJUSTMENT Insurance IFRS Seminar. Chris Hancorn. Session 11

Re: Defined Benefit Pension Plan Stress Testing

Research Paper. Provisions for Adverse Deviations in Going Concern Actuarial Valuations of Defined Benefit Pension Plans

Framework for a New Standard Approach to Setting Capital Requirements. Joint Committee of OSFI, AMF, and Assuris

Measurement of Investment Contracts and Service Contracts under International Financial Reporting Standards

Yours truly, [original signature on file] John Dark, FCIA CIA President

VALUATION MANUAL. NAIC Adoptions Through. April 6, 2016

IFRS 4 Phase 2 Insurance contracts Update on the industry s response. December 2, 2010

Pricing of Life Insurance and Annuity Products

2016 American Academy of Actuaries. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced without express permission. STOCHASTIC, DETERMINISTIC AND NPR RESERVES

Selection of Economic Assumptions for Measuring Pension Obligations

December 21, Re: Enhancing Retirement Security for Canadians

Property/Casualty Unpaid Claim Estimates

Regulatory Consultation Paper Round-up

Discounting of Property/Casualty Unpaid Claim Estimates

Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 73 1 (v 3) Treatment of new business in SCR

Canadian Institute of Actuaries Proposed Amendment to Bill S-201, An Act to prohibit and prevent genetic discrimination

PS 8 Update from OSFI and the ASB

Singapore Experience on Implementation of Risk Based Capital (RBC) Framework. 20 April 2009

Application of IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts

May 21, 2008 Document

Health and Disability Actuarial Assets and Liabilities Other Than Liabilities for Incurred Claims

Methods and Assumptions for Use in Life Insurance Company Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with U.S. GAAP

SOLVENCY ADVISORY COMMITTEE QUÉBEC CHARTERED LIFE INSURERS

November 1, GRA - MPI Exhibit #81. Minimum Capital Test For Federally Regulated Property and Casualty Insurance Companies

Assessing Regime Switching Equity Return Models

SOA Risk Management Task Force

Advanced Seminar on Principle Based Capital September 23, 2009 Session 1: C3P3 Overview

Transcription:

Memorandum To: From: All Fellows, Affiliates, Associates and Correspondents of the Canadian Institute of Actuaries and Other Interested Parties Jim Christie, Chair Actuarial Standards Board Ty Faulds, Chair Designated Group Date: December 13, 2013 Subject: Initial Communication of Promulgations of the Maximum Net Credit Spread, Ultimate Reinvestment Rates, and Calibration Criteria for Stochastic Risk-Free Interest Rates in the Standards of Practice for the Valuation of Insurance Contract Liabilities: Life and Health (Accident and Sickness) Insurance (Subsection 2330 of the Exposure Draft for Revisions to the Standards of Practice) Comment deadline: February 14, 2014 Document 213105 1. INTRODUCTION Subsection 2330 of the exposure draft Revisions to Economic Reinvestment Assumptions within the Practice-Specific Standards of Practice on Insurance Contract Valuation: Life and Health (Accident and Sickness) Insurance (Section 2300 and Subsection 1110), published December 13, 2013, refers to a number of economic parameters that would be promulgated from time to time by the Actuarial Standards Board (ASB). These economic parameters are the maximum net credit spread, the ultimate reinvestment rates (URRs), and the calibration criteria for stochastic risk-free interest rates. The ASB appointed the same designated group that is responsible for developing revised standards of practice, as described in the cover memo to the exposure draft, to develop these related promulgations. The ASB proposes to promulgate the use of the economic parameters described below, to be effective concurrent with the related final standards of practice. The ASB intends to review this promulgation every five years, or sooner if circumstances warrant. 360 Albert Street, Suite 1740, Ottawa ON K1R 7X7 613.236.8196 613.233.4552 secretariat@asb-cna.ca www.asb-cna.ca

2. PROPOSED PROMULGATION OF THE MAXIMUM NET CREDIT SPREAD Paragraph 2330.07.1 includes a reference to a maximum for the difference between the asset s credit spread and its asset depreciation assumption (the maximum net credit spread ) for assets purchased on or after the 30 th anniversary from the balance sheet date:.07.1 In all scenarios other than the base scenario, credit spreads include margins for adverse deviations as described in paragraph 2340.10.3. The actuary would also include an additional provision for adverse deviations by modifying the assumptions, if needed, on each fixed income asset purchased or sold on or after the 5 th anniversary from the balance sheet date, such that for assets purchased or sold on or after the 30 th anniversary from the balance sheet date, the difference between the asset s credit spread and its asset depreciation assumption is not larger than a maximum promulgated from time to time by the Actuarial Standards Board; and for assets purchased or sold between the 5 th and 30 th anniversary from the balance sheet date, the difference between the asset s credit spread and its asset depreciation assumption is not larger than using a uniform transition between the corresponding difference if purchased on the 5 th anniversary from the balance sheet date and the promulgated maximum if purchased on the 30 th anniversary from the balance sheet date. 2.1. Proposed Promulgation The proposed promulgated maximum for the difference between the asset s credit spread and its asset depreciation assumption for assets purchased on or after the 30 th anniversary from the balance sheet date shall be equal to 80 basis points. 2.2. Rationale The proposed maximum net credit spread was developed using the following approach: i. The average historical credit spread was calculated for short, medium, and long corporate bonds of various credit ratings over an extended historical period (of at least 25 years); ii. These credit spreads were adjusted by the average best estimate asset depreciation assumption from current industry practice; iii. These best estimate credit spreads net of default were adjusted by the margin for adverse deviations of 10% from paragraph 2340.10.3; and iv. The maximum credit spread of 80 basis points was developed assuming a representative mix of corporate bonds (higher weighting of A-rated bonds) of short, medium, and long durations (higher weighting of long-duration bonds). 3. PROPOSED PROMULGATION OF ULTIMATE REINVESTMENT RATES Paragraph 2330.09.01 includes a reference to URRs that are used in the construction of the base and prescribed scenarios:.09.01 The Actuarial Standards Board will promulgate from time to time the following ultimate risk-free reinvestment rates for use in the base scenario and the prescribed scenarios short-term ultimate risk-free reinvestment rate-high, 2

long-term ultimate risk-free reinvestment rate-high, short-term ultimate risk-free reinvestment rate-median, long-term ultimate risk-free reinvestment rate-median, short-term ultimate risk-free reinvestment rate-low, and long-term ultimate risk-free reinvestment rate-low. 3.1. Proposed Promulgation The proposed promulgated ultimate (risk-free) reinvestment rates to be used in the base scenario and in the prescribed scenarios are as follows: The short-term ultimate risk-free reinvestment rate-high shall be 10.0%; The long-term ultimate risk-free reinvestment rate-high shall be 10.4%; The short-term ultimate risk-free reinvestment rate-median shall be 4.0%; The long-term ultimate risk-free reinvestment rate-median shall be 5.3%; The short-term ultimate risk-free reinvestment rate-low shall be 1.4%; and The long-term ultimate risk-free reinvestment rate-low shall be 3.3%. 3.2. Rationale The ultimate risk-free reinvestment rates in this promulgation were developed with the support of extensive testing, to be reasonably consistent with the range of risk-free interest rates that would be generated by a stochastic model that satisfies the proposed promulgated calibration criteria for stochastic risk-free interest rates, also outlined in this document. The URR-median short-term and long-term rates were set equal to the median value (rounded to the nearest 10 basis points) of observed historical one-year maturity and 20-year maturity yields respectively. The URR-low and URR-high rates were set using the distribution of yields generated by a stochastic model that satisfies the proposed promulgated calibration criteria. The distributions were assessed 60 years from the projection starting point, and the selected URR-low and URRhigh rates were set to approximate the average of the lowest and highest 30% of observed riskfree interest rates in the stochastic projections respectively. 4. PROPOSED PROMULGATION OF CALIBRATION CRITERIA FOR STOCHASTIC RISK-FREE INTEREST RATES Paragraph 2330.32 includes a reference to calibration criteria for stochastic risk-free interest rates that would be met when the selection of risk-free interest rate scenarios is stochastic:.32 If the selection of interest rate scenarios is stochastic, the actuary s calibration of stochastic models would meet the criteria for risk-free interest rates as promulgated from time to time by the Actuarial Standards Board. 4.1. Proposed Promulgation Proposed promulgated calibration criteria are provided for: 1. The left and right tail, and the mean reversion of the long-term risk-free interest rate; 2. The left and right tail of the short-term risk-free interest rate; and 3. The slope of the risk-free interest rates curve. 3

All calibration criteria are expressed as bond equivalent yields. Calibration for the Long-Term Risk-Free Interest Rate The long-term risk-free rate is assumed to be a term of 20 years or greater. Left- and right-tail calibration criteria for the long-term risk-free interest rate are provided for the two-year, 10-year, and 60-year horizons. Risk-free interest rate scenarios at the two-year and 10- year horizons are influenced by the initial starting risk-free interest rate, so calibration criteria at each of a 4.00%, 6.25%, and 9.00% starting long-term risk-free interest rate are provided. At the 60-year horizon, the impact of the starting rate is assumed to be minimal, so only calibration criteria at a single starting rate of 6.25% are provided. The following table shows the left- and right-tail criteria for the long-term risk-free interest rate. Calibration Criteria for the Long-Term Risk-Free Interest Rate ( 20-Year Maturity) Horizon Two-Year 10-Year 60-Year Left-Tail Percentile Right-Tail Percentile Initial Rate 4.00% 6.25% 9.00% 4.00% 6.25% 9.00% 6.25% 2.5 th 2.85% 4.25% 6.20% 2.30% 2.90% 3.65% 2.60% 5.0 th 3.00% 4.50% 6.60% 2.50% 3.20% 4.25% 2.80% 10.0 th 3.25% 4.80% 7.05% 2.85% 3.65% 4.95% 3.00% 90.0 th 5.15% 7.80% 10.60% 6.85% 9.35% 11.60% 10.00% 95.0 th 5.55% 8.30% 11.20% 7.85% 10.40% 12.80% 12.00% 97.5 th 5.85% 8.70% 11.70% 8.85% 11.40% 13.90% 13.50% These calibration criteria would be satisfied if the stochastic risk-free interest rate model produces results that are less than or equal to each of the left-tail calibration criteria, and greater than or equal to each of the right-tail calibration criteria, for each of the initial rates. For all stochastic long-term risk-free interest rate models, the period of mean reversion would not be less than 14.5 years. The period of mean reversion is also referred to as the time constant. In a model with an explicit mean reversion speed of a, the period of the mean reversion is equal to 1/a. For simple stochastic risk-free interest rate models with an explicit mean reversion factor, this requirement can be satisfied by considering the value of the mean reversion parameter directly. For more complex models, this requirement can be satisfied by using a mathematical proof or using the procedure in Appendix A. Calibration for the Short-Term Risk-Free Interest Rate The short-term risk-free interest rate is assumed to be the one-year term. Left and right-tail calibration criteria for the short-term risk-free interest rate are provided for the two-year and 60-year horizons. Interest rate scenarios at the two-year horizon are influenced by the initial starting interest rate, so calibration criteria at each of a 2.00%, 4.50%, and 8.00% starting short-term risk-free interest rate are provided. At the 60-year horizon, the impact of the starting risk-free interest rate is assumed to be minimal, so only calibration criteria at a single starting risk-free interest rate of 4.50% are provided. 4

The following table shows the left- and right-tail criteria for the short-term risk-free interest rate. Calibration Criteria for the Short-Term Risk-Free Rate (One-Year Maturity) Horizon Two-Year 60-Year Left-Tail Percentile Right-Tail Percentile Initial Rate 2.00% 4.50% 8.00% 4.50% 2.5 th 0.85% 2.35% 5.50% 0.80% 5.0 th 1.00% 2.70% 5.95% 0.90% 10.0 th 1.15% 3.10% 6.40% 1.00% 90.0 th 3.00% 5.90% 9.75% 10.00% 95.0 th 3.35% 6.30% 10.25% 12.00% 97.5 th 3.60% 6.65% 10.65% 13.50% These calibration criteria would be satisfied if the stochastic risk-free interest rate model produces results that are less than or equal to each of the left-tail calibration criteria, and greater than or equal to each of the right-tail calibration criteria, for each of the initial risk-free interest rates. Calibration for the Slope of the Risk-Free Interest Rates Curve The slope of the yield curve is defined as the long-term risk-free interest rate less the short-term risk-free interest rate. Calibration criteria for the slope are provided for the 60-year horizon. The following table show the criteria for the slope of the risk-free interest rates curve. 60-Year Slope Calibration Criteria Percentile Calibration Criteria 5 th -1.00% 10 th -0.25% 90 th 2.50% 95 th 3.00% These calibration criteria will be satisfied if the distribution of the slope values produced by the model at the 60-year horizon are less than or equal to each of the left-tail calibration criteria and are greater than or equal to each of the right-tail calibration criteria. 4.2. Rationale A research paper is being concurrently released by the Canadian Institute of Actuaries (CIA) Committee on Life Insurance Financial Reporting that provides the basis for the proposed promulgated calibration criteria for stochastic risk-free interest rates. As noted in the research paper, models that satisfy the calibration criteria will be appropriate for use when actual risk-free interest rates are lower than the reference initial risk-free interest rates used for the calibration criteria (which were selected for consistency with the previous research paper published on the calibration of the long-term risk-free interest rate). 5

5. CRITERIA FOR THE ADOPTION OF STANDARDS OF PRACTICE The proposed promulgations of the maximum net credit spread, URRs, and calibration criteria for stochastic risk-free interest rates meet the criteria set out in section B of the ASB s Policy on Due Process for the Adoption of Standards of Practice. Specifically: 1. The public interest is advanced through the use of consistent criteria for establishing riskfree interest rates assumptions and thereby constraining risk-free interest rate assumptions to a reasonable range. 2. Provision is made for the appropriate application of professional judgement within a reasonable range. The proposed calibration criteria allow the actuary to use any model that fits with the promulgated calibration criteria for stochastic risk-free interest rates. 3. Use of the proposed calibration criteria, URRs, and maximum credit spread is practical for actuaries with relevant training. 4. The proposed promulgation is considered to be unambiguous. 6. DUE PROCESS Due process was followed in developing this initial promulgation document, as described in section D of the ASB s Policy on Due Process for the Adoption of Standards of Practice. 7. PROPOSED EFFECTIVE DATE AND FUTURE TIMING It is intended that the promulgations would be effective concurrent with the related final standards and that the final communication of the promulgations would be published concurrent with the publication of the related final standards. Reference may be made to the cover memo to the exposure draft for further information regarding timing. 8. COMMENTS Comments on the proposed promulgations are invited by February 14, 2014. Please send your comments, preferably in an electronic form, to Chris Fievoli at chris.fievoli@cia-ica.ca with copies to Ty Faulds at Ty.Faulds@londonlife.com. No other specific forums for submitting comments are planned. JC, TF 6

APPENDIX A Satisfaction of the mean reversion criterion can be demonstrated with the following procedure: 1. Sort Scenarios for lowest to highest long-term rate at projection year T0, where T0 is sufficiently long to accumulate substantial dispersion in rates, but not so long as to be beyond most expected reinvestments. For a typical long-term guaranteed block, T0 might be in the range of five to 10 years. 2. Group the scenarios by rate quartile at T0, from lowest (Quartile 1) to highest (Quartile 4). Calculate the magnitude of dispersion of low-rate scenarios from central scenarios dispersion (T0) = Average rate (T0) within Quartile 1 average rate (T0) within combined (Quartile 2 & Quartile 3). 3. Using the same scenario grouping (ranked at T0, not re-ranked at T0+10) calculate 10- year-later dispersion (T0+10, ranked T0) = Average rate (T0+10) within Quartile 1 average rate (T0+10) within combined (Quartile 2 & Quartile 3). 4. The mean reversion criterion over the projection period from T0 to T0 +10 is satisfied if dispersion (T0+10, ranked T0) > = 0.5 * dispersion (T0). 5. If the actuary can demonstrate that the model rate of mean reversion is similarly robust across other projection periods, this single test would be sufficient. If not, the test would be repeated across sufficient financially meaningful periods to demonstrate sustained periods of low rates. 6. Should periods of sustained high rates be financially stressful for a particular application in the opinion of the actuary, the demonstration would be repeated for these rates (Quartile 4 relative to quartiles 2 & 3). 7