The ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) First quarter of 2016

Similar documents
The ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters. Fourth quarter of 2016

The ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) Third quarter of 2016

The ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters. First quarter of 2017

The ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters. Second quarter of 2017

RESULTS OF THE ECB SURVEY OF PROFESSIONAL FORECASTERS FOR THE SECOND QUARTER OF 2012

The ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters. First quarter of 2018

54 ECB RESULTS OF THE ECB SURVEY OF PROFESSIONAL FORECASTERS FOR THE FOURTH QUARTER OF 2009

December 2018 Eurosystem staff macroeconomic projections for the euro area 1

December 2017 Eurosystem staff macroeconomic projections for the euro area 1

September 2017 ECB staff macroeconomic projections for the euro area 1

Economic Projections :2

March 2018 ECB staff macroeconomic projections for the euro area 1

JUNE 2015 EUROSYSTEM STAFF MACROECONOMIC PROJECTIONS FOR THE EURO AREA 1

Economic Projections :1

Projections for the Portuguese Economy:

Economic ProjEctions for

Economic Projections :3

Economic projections

The main assumptions underlying the scenario are as follows (see the table):

DECEMBER 2015 EUROSYSTEM STAFF MACROECONOMIC PROJECTIONS FOR THE EURO AREA 1

Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices (October 2014)

JUNE 2014 EUROSYSTEM STAFF MACROECONOMIC PROJECTIONS FOR THE EURO AREA 1

Developments in inflation and its determinants

Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices (April 2014)

Economic Projections For 2014 And 2015

2.10 PROJECTIONS. Macroeconomic scenario for Italy (percentage changes on previous year, unless otherwise indicated)

Medium-term. forecast. Update Q4

MACROECONOMIC FORECAST

MEDIUM-TERM FORECAST

5. Bulgarian National Bank Forecast of Key

Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices (April 2010)

Economic Projections for

MACROECONOMIC FORECAST

Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices (April 2017) Summary

Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices

The main assumptions underlying the scenario are as follows (see the table):

Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices (October 2017)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS. September 2006 Interim forecast

Latvia's Macro Profile January 2019

Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices (April 2018)

MediuM-terM forecast Q4 2014

Medium-term. forecast

ECONOMIC RECOVERY AT CRUISE SPEED

Latest Macroeconomic Projections - May Vice-Governor Anita Angelovska-Bezhoska

South African Reserve Bank STATEMENT OF THE MONETARY POLICY COMMITTEE. Issued by Lesetja Kganyago, Governor of the South African Reserve Bank

Slovak Macroeconomic Outlook

Medium-term. forecast

5. Bulgarian National Bank Forecast of Key

Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices (January 2018)

MACROECONOMIC PROJECTIONS FOR SLOVENIA

Introduction and summary

COMMISSION OPINION. of on the Draft Budgetary Plan of Portugal. {SWD(2017) 525 final}

44 ECB HOW HAS MACROECONOMIC UNCERTAINTY IN THE EURO AREA EVOLVED RECENTLY?

Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices (January 2019)

Meeting with Analysts

Eurozone Economic Watch Higher growth forecasts for January 2018

Macroeconomic projections for Assumptions from the external surrounding. Baseline macroeconomic scenario for

Monetary Policy Report, June 2017

5. Bulgarian National Bank Forecast of Key

INFLATION REPORT / I 011 2

Economic Bulletin Issue 2 / 2018

Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices (July 2018)

Czech Monetary Policy and Economic Outlook

Monetary Policy Statement 1

Economic Bulletin. Issue 8 / ,5E 7,5E

Meeting with Analysts

COMMISSION OPINION. of on the Draft Budgetary Plan of BELGIUM

South African Reserve Bank STATEMENT OF THE MONETARY POLICY COMMITTEE. Issued by Lesetja Kganyago, Governor of the South African Reserve Bank

Minutes of the Monetary Policy Council decision-making meeting held on 6 July 2016

ECB Watch: The ECB delivers a down size of the APP

Medium-term. forecast

Finland falling further behind euro area growth

South African Reserve Bank STATEMENT OF THE MONETARY POLICY COMMITTEE. Issued by Lesetja Kganyago, Governor of the South African Reserve Bank

Macroeconomic and financial market developments. March 2014

Economic Bul etin Issue 8 / 2016

Eurozone Economic Watch. July 2018

Monetary Policy Summary and minutes of the Monetary Policy Committee meeting ending on 10 May 2017

BANK OF FINLAND ARTICLES ON THE ECONOMY

Slight change in ECB wording

NBS MoNthly BulletiN december 2016

Eurozone. Economic Watch FEBRUARY 2017

NBS MoNthly BulletiN february 2017

INFLATION REPORT / III

Economic Bulletin Issue 8 / 2018

Economic and monetary. developments. The results of the euro area bank lending survey for the second quarter of 2014

Economic Bulletin December 2018

OVERVIEW. The EU recovery is firming. Table 1: Overview - the winter 2014 forecast Real GDP. Unemployment rate. Inflation. Winter 2014 Winter 2014

COMMISSION OPINION. of on the Draft Budgetary Plan of Portugal

Table 1.1. A comparison between the present forecast and the previous forecast in selected areas.

Economic activity gathers pace

ECONOMIC OUTLOOK UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS ECONOMICS RESEARCH CENTRE. October Issue 15/4

Starting with the measures of uncertainty related to future economic outcomes, the following three sets of indicators are considered:

I N F L A T I O N R E P O R T

Leumi. Global Economics Monthly Review. Arie Tal, Research Economist. July 12, Capital Markets Division, Economics Department. leumiusa.

International Monetary and Financial Committee

EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK ECB EZB EKT BCE EKP. MONTHLY BULLETIN August August 2000

Draghi calm on recent data but more vigilant on protectionism

MACROECONOMIC PROJECTIONS FOR THE PERIOD

EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK MONTHLY BULLETIN MONTHLY BULLETIN OCTOBER

abcdefg Introductory remarks by Jean-Pierre Roth News Conference

Transcription:

The ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) First quarter of 16 January 16

Content 1 Inflation expectations maintain upward profile but have been revised down for 16 and 17 3 2 Longer-term inflation expectations edged down to 1.8% 5 3 Real GDP growth expectations are unchanged 6 4 Unemployment rate expectations have been revised down slightly 8 5 Other variables and conditioning assumptions The ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) First quarter of 16 1

The results of the ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) for the first quarter of 16 1 show average inflation expectations of.7%, 1.4% and 1.6% for 16, 17 and 18 respectively. This implies downward revisions of.3 percentage point for 16 and of.1 percentage point for 17 (expectations for 18 were not surveyed in the previous round), but maintains the upward path in the forecast inflation profile. Average longer-term inflation expectations (for ) edged down to 1.8% from 1.9% (at the second decimal down to 1.8% from 1.86%). Real GDP growth expectations were unchanged at all horizons, standing at 1.7% for 16, 1.8% for 17 and 1.7% for 18 and in the longer term (for ). Unemployment rate expectations, which continue to show a downward profile, were revised down over the whole horizon. Table Results of the SPF in comparison with other forecasts and projections (annual percentage changes, unless otherwise indicated) Survey horizon HICP inflation 16 17 18 Longer-term 1) SPF Q1 16.7 1.4 1.6 1.8 Previous SPF (Q4 15) 1. 1.5-1.9 Eurosystem staff macroeconomic projections (Dec. 15) 1. 1.6 - - Consensus Economics (Dec. 15) 1. 1.5 1.6 1.9 Euro Zone Barometer (Dec. 15) 1. 1.5 1.7 1.8 Real GDP growth 16 17 18 Longer-term 1) SPF Q1 16 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.7 Previous SPF (Q4 15) 1.7 1.8-1.7 Eurosystem staff macroeconomic projections (Dec. 15) 1.7 1.9 - - Consensus Economics (Dec. 15) 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 Euro Zone Barometer (Dec. 15) 1.7 1.8 1.5 1.4 Unemployment rate 2) 16 17 18 Longer-term 1) SPF Q1 16.3 9.9 9.4 9. Previous SPF (Q4 15).5.1-9.2 Eurosystem staff macroeconomic projections (Dec. 15).5.1 - - Consensus Economics (Dec. 15).5 - - - Euro Zone Barometer (Dec. 15).5.2 9.8 9.5 1) Longer-term expectations refer to for the SPF and for Consensus Economics and to 19 for the Euro Zone Barometer. For Consensus Economics and the Euro Zone Barometer, expectations for 17, 18 and longer term are taken from the October 15 surveys. 2) As a percentage of the labour force. 1 The survey was conducted between 5 and 11 January 16. The total number of responses was 57, which is broadly in line with the historical average number of responses. The survey requested information on expectations for the euro area HICP inflation rate, the real GDP growth rate and the unemployment rate for 16, 17, 18 and, as well as for each of these variables one and two years ahead. Participants were provided with a common set of the latest available data for HICP inflation (December 15,.2% year on year), GDP growth (Q3 15, 1.6% year on year) and unemployment (November 15,.5%). The cut-off date for data used in this report was 12 January 16. The ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) First quarter of 16 2

1 Inflation expectations maintain upward profile but have been revised down for 16 and 17 The Q1 16 SPF average point forecasts for inflation in 16, 17 and 18 stand at.7%, 1.4% and 1.6% respectively. This implies downward revisions of.3 percentage point for 16 and.1 percentage point for 17 compared with the survey round for the fourth quarter of 15 (see Table). Compared with the December 15 Eurosystem staff macroeconomic projections, which were finalised on the basis of data and assumptions available in mid-november 15, expected inflation is lower by.3 percentage point for 16 and by.2 percentage point for 17. The Q1 16 SPF inflation expectations are also lower than those from the December 15 Consensus Economics and Euro Zone Barometer surveys. In the course of 16 and in 17, most SPF respondents envisage a strong pick-up in inflation from current levels. However, in the short term, oil price movements will exert a strong dampening impact on inflation and counteract favourable base effects arising from past developments. By the end of 16 though, respondents expect headline inflation to rise, aided by increasing energy price inflation as oil prices are assumed to increase. Respondents envisage a profile of moderate but gradually increasing underlying inflation, which is shaped by the ongoing expansion of economic activity and supported by the monetary policy stance. Respondents consider that there will only be a slow closing of the output gap and labour cost growth will pick up slowly. The weaker euro exchange rate in 15 is still expected to exert some upward pressure on inflation in 16. Respondents reported that the downward revisions from the previous round mainly reflected oil price declines since the previous survey. In addition, the forecast evolution of labour cost (i.e. compensation per employee) growth is slightly lower. In contrast, the US dollar/euro exchange rate is expected to be slightly lower and to have an upward impact on the inflation outlook. For more details, see the section entitled Other variables and conditioning assumptions. Compared with the previous SPF round, the aggregated probability distributions for expected inflation in 16 and 17 moved towards lower outcomes. For 16 the modal (or most likely) outcome is now in the.5-.9% range (see Chart 1), while for 17 it has remained in the 1.5-1.9% bin (see Chart 2). Overall, however, the probability mass on the lower side of the mean has increased. For 18 the most likely outcome is also in the 1.5-1.9% range (see Chart 3). According to survey participants, there is a very high probability of inflation remaining below 1.% in 16 (65%), but this probability is lower for 17 and 18 (at around %). Respondents put the probability of negative inflation in 16 at below % and considerably lower, at around 2%, in 17 and 18. The ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) First quarter of 16 3

Chart 1 Aggregated probability distribution of inflation expectations for 16 Chart 2 Aggregated probability distribution of inflation expectations for 17 Q3 15 SPF Q4 15 SPF Q1 16 SPF Q3 15 SPF Q4 15 SPF Q1 16 SPF 4 4 < -.5 -.5 to -.1. to.4.5 to.9 1. to 1.4 1.5 to 1.9 2. to 2.4 2.5 to 2.9 3. to 3.4 3.5 < -.5 -.5 to -.1. to.4.5 to.9 1. to 1.4 1.5 to 1.9 2. to 2.4 2.5 to 2.9 3. to 3.4 3.5 Chart 3 Aggregated probability distribution of inflation expectations for 18 4 Q1 16 SPF < -.5 -.5 to -.1. to.4.5 to.9 1. to 1.4 1.5 to 1.9 2. to 2.4 2.5 to 2.9 3. to 3.4 3.5 Based on both the quantitative and qualitative information provided by respondents, the balance of risks to the baseline inflation outlook remained on the downside. A quantitative comparison of the estimated means of the aggregated probability distribution with the average point forecasts suggests that the risks to the baseline inflation outlook are perceived as relatively balanced for 16 and on the downside for 17 and 18. The qualitative comments refer to downside risks stemming primarily from external factors namely oil prices and emerging market economies. Regarding oil prices, while some respondents see both upward and downward risks, the latter are perceived to dominate particularly in the shorter term and are generally linked to the ample supply of oil combined with weaker oil demand from emerging economies. Emerging market economies, in particular China and Brazil, are also cited as more general downward risks to the global demand outlook. Exchange rate developments were cited as both upward and downward risks, but the risks from these developments were judged to be broadly balanced on average. The ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) First quarter of 16 4

2 Longer-term inflation expectations edged down to 1.8% The average point forecast for longer-term inflation expectations (for ) edged down to 1.8% from 1.9% (or to 1.8% from 1.86% when considered at two decimal places). The median also edged down to 1.85% from 1.9%, while the modal (most reported) value was 1.9% compared with 2.% previously (see Chart 4). Over 75% of the respondents expect longer-term inflation to be in the range 1.7-2.% (see Chart 5). 2 Chart 4 Outlook for longer-term inflation expectations Chart 5 Cross-sectional distribution of long-term inflation forecasts (annual percentage changes) (percentage of respondents) average point forecast median point forecasts mean of the aggregate probability distribution Q3 15 Q4 15 Q1 16 2. 35 2.5 2. 1.95 1.9 25 1.85 1.8 1.75 15 1.7 1.65 1.6 5 Q1 1 Q1 2 Q1 3 Q1 4 Q1 5 Q1 6 Q1 7 Q1 8 Q1 9 Q1 Q1 11 Q1 12 Q1 13 Q1 14 Q1 15 Q1 16 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2. 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 The aggregated probability distribution shifted down slightly when compared with the previous SPF round (see Chart 6). On average, the balance of risks around the point forecast is assessed as remaining on the downside (as has been the case since 9), with the estimated mean of the aggregated probability distribution standing at around 1.64% compared with the mean point estimate of 1.8%. The probability of inflation being at or above 2.% was %, compared with 36% in the fourth quarter of 15, while that of its being below 1% was 15%, up from 13% in the previous round. The probability of negative inflation rates remained low at 2%. Disagreement over longer-term inflation expectations, as measured by the standard deviation of the point forecasts, increased slightly from the previous round. This was also the case for the quasi-standard deviation a measure which is more robust to outliers. 3 The aggregate uncertainty surrounding longer-term inflation expectations, as measured by the standard deviation of the aggregated probability 2 3 The 75th percentile of the distribution of the point forecasts edged down to 1.96% from 2.%, while the 25th percentile was unchanged at 1.7%. The quasi-standard deviation is calculated as half of the difference between the 16th and 84th percentiles of the sample of point forecasts, which with normally distributed data delivers the standard deviation. The ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) First quarter of 16 5

distribution (see Chart 7), was largely unchanged, as the small increase in disagreement was offset by a small decrease in average individual uncertainty (the average standard deviation of the individual probability distributions). 4 Chart 6 Aggregated probability distribution of longer-term inflation expectations (five years ahead) Chart 7 Disagreement and uncertainty regarding longer-term inflation expectations Q3 15 SPF Q4 15 SPF Q1 16 SPF standard deviation of point forecasts (left-hand scale) aggregate uncertainty (left-hand scale) probability of inflation at or above 2% (right-hand scale) 4.9 9.8 8.7.6 7 6.5 5.4 4.3.2.1. < -.5 -.5 to -.1. to.4.5 to.9 1. to 1.4 1.5 to 1.9 2. to 2.4 2.5 to 2.9 3. to 3.4 3.5 Q1 1 Q1 2 Q1 3 Q1 4 Q1 5 Q1 6 Q1 7 Q1 8 Q1 9 Q1 Q1 11 Q1 12 Q1 13 Q1 14 Q1 15 Q1 16 3 Real GDP growth expectations are unchanged The overall outlook for economic activity was unchanged from the previous round. The average point forecast for real GDP growth remained at 1.7% for 16 and at 1.8% for 17 (see Table). For 18 participants on average expect an increase of 1.7%. According to qualitative comments provided by the respondents, their baseline scenarios continue to explain the robust economic growth with growth in private consumption and investment, as the current low level of energy prices supports disposable income of households and profit margins of companies. Furthermore, respondents expect domestic demand to benefit from the accommodative monetary policy and less restrictive fiscal policies, still outweighing the weaker expectations for external demand from emerging markets, most importantly China. The average SPF point forecasts are broadly in line with the December 15 Eurosystem staff macroeconomic projections. They are equal for 16 and.1 percentage point lower for 17. SPF expectations for 16 are also in line with the latest forecasts from the Euro Zone Barometer and Consensus Economics surveys. 4 The dispersion of the aggregated probability distribution ( aggregate uncertainty ) can be decomposed into two factors: disagreement and average individual uncertainty. Disagreement is measured by the dispersion of the individual forecasts, whilst average individual uncertainty is measured by the average dispersion of the individual probability distributions. The ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) First quarter of 16 6

Chart 8 Aggregated probability distribution of 16 GDP growth expectations Chart 9 Aggregated probability distribution of 17 GDP growth expectations Q3 15 SPF Q4 15 SPF Q1 16 SPF Q3 15 SPF Q4 15 SPF Q1 16 SPF 5 5 4 4 <-1. -1. -.6 -.5 -.-.4.5-.9 1.-1.4 1.5-1.9 2.-2.4 2.5-2.9 3..1 <-1. -1. -.6 -.5 -.-.4.5-.9 1.-1.4 1.5-1.9 2.-2.4 2.5-2.9 3..1 Chart Aggregated probability distribution of 18 GDP growth expectations Chart 11 Aggregated probability distribution of longer-term GDP growth expectations (five years ahead) Q1 16 SPF Q3 15 SPF Q4 15 SPF Q1 16 SPF 5 5 4 4 < - 1. -1. -.6 -.5 -.1.-.4.5-.9 1.- 1.4 1.5-1.9 2.- 2.4 2.5-2.9 3.- 3.4 3.5-3.9 4. < - 1. -1. -.6 -.5 -.1.-.4.5-.9 1.- 1.4 1.5-1.9 2.- 2.4 2.5-2.9 3.- 3.4 3.5-3.9 4. The aggregated probability distributions for 16 and 17 have become slightly more concentrated around outcomes between 1.5% and 1.9% (see Charts 8 and 9). For 16 and 17 the probabilities assigned to this bin (41% and 36% respectively) have increased compared with the previous survey round. Also for 18 forecasters assign the highest probability (31%) to an outcome between 1.5% and 1.9% (see Chart ). The balance of risks to GDP growth (as measured by the difference between the mean of the aggregated probability distribution and the average point forecast) remains tilted somewhat to the downside for all three years. The majority of the qualitative comments by the respondents continued to report a possibly stronger downturn in China and other emerging economies as by far the The ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) First quarter of 16 7

main downside risk surrounding their forecasts. Other downside risks mentioned relate to external factors, including a possible escalation of the geopolitical tensions and more volatile global financial markets. 5 In addition to external factors, respondents somewhat more often than previously identified downside risks stemming from continuing policy uncertainty within Europe. Upside risks identified relate to structural reforms providing a higher than assumed contribution to growth and to possible public stimulus of housing investment and consumption in the context of the inflow of refugees. Longer-term growth expectations (for ) remained unchanged at 1.7%. The SPF results for that horizon remain higher than the latest available Consensus Economics and Euro Zone Barometer forecasts from October 15, which stood at 1.4%. The aggregated probability distribution of the SPF longer-term growth expectations has become marginally more dispersed (suggesting more uncertainty) and the mean of the distribution in relation to the average point forecast suggests that respondents continue to perceive risks to be slightly on the downside (see Chart 11). 4 Unemployment rate expectations have been revised down slightly The average point forecasts for the unemployment rate were.3% for 16, 9.9% for 17 and 9.4% for 18. This implies a downward revision by.2 percentage point over all horizons with respect to the previous round (see Table). The expectations path remains downward sloping. The expectations are.2 percentage point lower in 16 and 17 than those in the December 15 Eurosystem staff macroeconomic projection exercise. They are also lower when compared with the December 15 Consensus Economics and Euro Zone Barometer surveys. SPF respondents perceive the balance of risks to their unemployment rate forecasts to be tilted slightly to the upside (see Charts 12-14). These upside risks are mainly mirroring downside risks to expected real GDP growth in the short run mainly owing to the current loss of momentum in emerging economies. Another short-run upside risk mentioned by some respondents is the recent high inflows of refugees. Concerning downside risks, several panellists consider that labour markets will become more flexible in the long run thanks to the implementation of structural reforms. The average point forecast for the longer-term unemployment rate (in ) is 9.%, representing a downward revision of.2 percentage point from the previous round. The average point forecasts are now at their lowest level since 12, although they remain higher than average pre-crisis expectations (of around 5 In this round, SPF respondents were explicitly asked about their assumptions/expectations regarding monetary policy and economic developments in the international environment and the role they play in the baseline and risks of the growth and inflation forecasts for the euro area. The ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) First quarter of 16 8

7%). Together with the average point forecast, the aggregated probability distribution has also slightly moved towards lower levels compared with the previous SPF round (see Chart 15). Compared with the previous round, the distribution of responses is more clearly skewed towards higher values. This matches the downside risks recorded for real GDP developments. Chart 12 Aggregated probability distribution of the unemployment rate for 16 Chart 13 Aggregated probability distribution of the unemployment rate for 17 Q3 15 SPF Q4 15 SPF Q1 16 SPF Q3 15 SPF Q4 15 SPF Q1 16 SPF 4 4 <6.5 6.5-6.9 7.- 7.4 7.5-7.9 8.- 8.4 8.5-8.9 9.- 9.4 9.5-9.9.-.4.5-11.-.9 11.4 11.5-11.9 >= >=12.5 12. <6.5 6.5-6.9 7.- 7.4 7.5-7.9 8.- 8.4 8.5-8.9 9.- 9.4 9.5-9.9.-.4.5-11.-.9 11.4 11.5-11.9 >= >=12.5 12. Chart 14 Aggregated probability distribution of the unemployment rate for 18 Chart 15 Aggregated probability distribution of longer-term unemployment rate expectations Q1 16 SPF Q3 15 SPF Q4 15 SPF Q1 16 SPF 4 4 <6.5 6.5-6.9 7.- 7.4 7.5-7.9 8.- 8.4 8.5-8.9 9.- 9.4 9.5-9.9.-.4.5-11.- 11.5-.9 11.4 11.9 >= 12. <6.5 6.5-6.9 7.- 7.4 7.5-7.9 8.- 8.4 8.5-8.9 9.- 9.4 9.5-9.9.-.4.5-11.- 11.5-.9 11.4 11.9 >= 12. The ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) First quarter of 16 9

5 Other variables and conditioning assumptions Other information provided by respondents suggests revisions in key assumption variables compared with the previous round. In particular, there have been large downward revisions of assumptions for oil prices in US dollars and smaller ones for the USD/EUR exchange rate, growth rates of compensation per employee and the short-term interest rate. Oil prices are now expected to average USD 39 per barrel in the first quarter of 16 and to increase to USD 49 by the fourth quarter of 16 and to levels around USD 53 in 17 and USD 58 in 18. Compared with the previous survey round, oil price assumptions are lower by around 25% in the first quarter of 16 and 15-% thereafter (see Chart 16a). The expected path for the EUR/USD exchange rate (decreasing initially from around 1.8 in Q1 16 to 1.7 in Q2 and Q3 16, but rising again thereafter) is slightly lower than in the previous SPF round (see Chart 16b). Despite this, the strong downward revision in assumed crude oil prices in dollar terms means that oil prices in euro terms are also substantially lower. The profile of the annual growth in compensation per employee has been revised down by.1 percentage point across the forecast horizon, standing at 1.6% for 16, 1.7% for 17, 1.8% for 17, 1.8% for 18 and 2.% for (see Chart 16c). The mean assumption for the rate on the Eurosystem s main refinancing operations is that it will stand at.5% throughout 16, but then edge upwards to.11% in 17 and.41% in 18 (see Chart 16d). Compared with the previous round, the expectation for 17 is.1 percentage point lower. The ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) First quarter of 16

Chart 16 Underlying assumptions a) Oil price (in USD) 75 b) EUR/USD exchange rate 1.25 7 65 Q4 15 SPF 1. 6 55 1.15 Q4 15 SPF 5 45 Q1 16 SPF 1. 4 1.5 Q1 16 SPF 35 16Q1 16Q2 16Q3 16Q4 17 18 1. 16Q1 16Q2 16Q3 16Q4 17 18 c) Compensation per employee 3. d) ECB interest rate.8.7 2.5 Q4 15 SPF.6.5 2..4.3.2 Q4 15 SPF 1.5.1 1. Q1 16 SPF 16 17 18 19. -.1 Q1 16 SPF 16Q1 16Q2 16Q3 16Q4 17 18 Notes: The dashed lines and small line markers proxy the uncertainty surrounding average assumptions (plus/minus one standard deviation of the point estimates). The assumptions for 18 were not surveyed in the previous (Q4 15) round. European Central Bank, 16 Postal address 664 Frankfurt am Main, Germany Telephone +49 69 1344 Website www.ecb.europa.eu All rights reserved. Reproduction for educational and non-commercial purposes is permitted provided that the source is acknowledged. ISSN EU catalogue No 2363-367 (online) QB-BR-16-1-EN-N (online) The ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) First quarter of 16 11