Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 3 Focus. June 2014 San Francisco, California

Similar documents
Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 4 Focus. May 2015 San Francisco, California

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 2 Focus. July 2015 San Francisco, California

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 3 Focus. November 2016 San Francisco, California

Draft SFMTA Strategic Plan 11/14/2011, San Francisco California

Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets

SFMTA Board Presentation January 16, 2018

Final Report June 1, 2012 San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) 2012 Budget Balancing Panel

METRO. Fiscal Year 2014 Monthly Board Report. May 2014

SFMTA 2013 Revenue Bond Board of Directors

METRO. Fiscal Year 2015 Monthly Board Report. February 2015

METRO. Fiscal Year 2012 Monthly Board Report. September 2012 (Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

PROPOSED FY 2015 & 2016 OPERATING BUDGET & CAPITAL BUDGET PROPOSED FY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP)

METRO. Fiscal Year Monthly Performance Report. Revenue Expense Ridership Performance. November 2018 (Third Quarter Fiscal Year-to Date)

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

METRO MONTHLY BOARD REPORT

METRO. Fiscal Year 2017 Monthly Performance Report. Revenue Expense Ridership Performance. October 2016

METRO. Fiscal Year 2012 Monthly Board Report. December 2011 (First Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)

METRO. Fiscal Year Monthly Performance Report. Revenue Expense Ridership Performance. February 2018 (First Quarter Fiscal Year-to Date)

Balancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City

METRO. Fiscal Year 2013 Monthly Board Report. December 2012 (First Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)

August 31, 2016 Financial Report

METRO. Fiscal Year 2013 Monthly Board Report. November 2012

METRO. Fiscal Year Monthly Performance Report. Revenue Expense Ridership Performance. May 2018 (Second Quarter Fiscal Year-to Date)

Balancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City

METRO. Fiscal Year 2013 Monthly Board Report. January 2013

SFMTA Municipal Transportation Agency Operating Budget Projections FY SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA PROJECTED OPERATING BUDGET

FY 2013 and FY 2014 Preliminary Operating Budget (As of mid February 2012) February 21, 2012 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

FY 2013 and FY 2014 Proposed Operating Budget An Investment in Maintenance. April 3, 2012 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

METRO. Fiscal Year 2015 Monthly Board Report. September 2015 (Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at March 2017 compared to March 2016.

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at September 2017 compared to September 2016.

Operating Budget. Third Quarter Financial Report (July 2005 March 2006)

Budget Process Overview and Cost Allocation Methodology

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Financial Statements and Supplemental Schedules. June 30, 2013

The year to date is less than budget and prior year by 15.4 million and 11.6 million, respectively.

Balancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at August 2018 compared to August 2017.

METRO. Monthly Board Report. June 2006

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at December 2017 compared to December 2016.

April 30, 2016 Financial Report

Financial Report - FY 2017 Year to Date May 31, 2017

February 2016 Financial Report

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at February 2017 compared to February 2016.

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at June 2018 compared to June 2017.

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at January 2018 compared to January 2017.

Performance Management Accountability Meeting Data as of October, 2012

Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun

THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO. : 14 SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DIVISION: Finance and Information Technology BRIEF

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Monthly Performance & Financial Report For Period Ending October 31, 2012 Soft Close

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY. Financial Statements and Supplemental Schedules. June 30, 2016 and 2015

VIIl. Agency Financial Plans and 12-Month Allocations

RE: Citizens Advisory Committee October 1, 2014

FY2014 Operating Budget Performance Report

OPERATING BUDGET FY Actual Results (Unaudited) October 20, 2009 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at March 2018 compared to March 2017.

FY2014 Capital and Operating Budget Discussion

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at July 2016 compared to July 2015.

Operating Budget. Second Quarter Financial Report

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

FY 2011 and FY 2012 Operating Budget APRIL 6, 2010 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

HART Financial Snapshot. HART Finance and Audit Committee January 23, 2017

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Monthly Financial Report For Period Ending November 30, 2013

Financial Update for the Period Ended April 7, 2018

Getting Metro Back on Track

FY18 Final Results Budget Outlook, FY20-22

Financial Plan. Section 8 STATUS QUO PLAN STATUS QUO PLAN ASSUMPTIONS STATUS QUO PLAN BUDGET ITEMS

Quarterly Capital Progress Update

REVENUE BOND Policies & Procedures

TRANSIT SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AND RENOVATION. VEHICLES - Caltrain

Financial Report Fiscal Year 2018

Municipal Transportation Agency FY Capital Improvement Program Balboa Park. Balboa Park Citizen s Advisory Committee April 22, 2014

Operating Budget Stability

Business & Financial Services December 2017

TRANSPORTATION FEE PROPOSAL FY2018

$180 $160 $140 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $ Single Fam -New Apts -New

For Action. TTC 15-Year Capital Investment Plan & Capital Budget & Plan. Summary

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority

San Francisco County Transportation Authority Prop K/Prop AA Allocation Request Form. Light Rail Vehicle Procurement

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission

New York City Transit

FY2018 Third Quarter Financial Update

Transit Effectiveness Project

BOW VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT SERVICES COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING. BVRTSC Boardroom 221 Beaver Street, Banff, AB. AGENDA March 14, :00 4:00 pm

2019 MANAGEMENT & FINANCIAL PLAN

Capital Improvement Program Update

ADDENDUM IMPORTANT DOCUMENT INVITATION TO NEGOTIATE ADDENDUM. OPENING DATE & TIME: December 17, 2018; 3:00PM

Financial Management Report... 3

and Motor Carrier Tax (IFTA)

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

May 31, 2016 Financial Report

FY06 Operating Budget. FY2006 Proposed Operating Budget. Final Summary for Board Referral

TACOMA st Quarter Report April 30 th, Providing Results on Tacoma s Core Services OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET 1

Financial Update for the Period Ended June 2, 2018

Quarterly Financial Review

METRO. (Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

GENERAL FUND AT A GLANCE Category Budget YTD Actual % % Year Passed Resources 8.33% Uses 8.33% $0 $1,330,750

Transcription:

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 3 Focus June 2014 San Francisco, California 1

Goal 3 focus Improve the environment and quality of life in San Francisco Objective 3.1 Reduce the Agency s and the transportation system s resource consumption, emissions, waste, and noise Objective 3.2 Increase the transportation system s positive impact to the economy Objective 3.3 Allocate capital resources effectively Objective 3.4 Deliver services efficiently Objective 3.5 Reduce capital and operating structural deficits 2

Objective 3.1 Reduce the Agency s and the transportation system s resource consumption, emissions, waste, and noise Key performance indicator 3.1.1 Metric tons of C02e for the transportation system 2,266,322 (2010) Other indicators (including most recent month, prior month, same month prior year, and fiscal year averages) ID Metric Target FY13 Avg FY14 Avg Nov 2012 Oct 2013 Nov 2013 3.1.1 Metric tons of C02e for the transportation system 1,515,000 2,266,322 (2010) % of SFMTA non-revenue and taxi fleet that is alternative 3.1.2 fuel/zero emissions 94% (taxi) 3.1.3 % biodiesel to diesel used by SFMTA 19.3% 3.1.4 Number of electric vehicle charging stations 31 3.1.5 Citywide gasoline consumption rate 149,156,104 (2009) 3.1.6 Agency electricity consumption (kwh) 122,809,359 3.1.6 Agency gas consumption (therms) 415,308 3.1.6 Agency water consumption (gallons) 20,116,592 3.1.7 Agency compost production (tons) 14 (CY09) 3.1.7 Agency recycling production (tons) 535 (CY09) 3.1.7 Agency waste production (tons) 593 (CY09) Note: Reported results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 3

Objective 3.1 action items Reduce the Agency and transportation system s resource consumption, emissions, waste, and noise Key action item updates 3.1.1 Install EV Chargers in SFMTA Garages Installed EV Chargers over 80% in use 3.1.4 Develop citywide fuel contract New contract in place reducing fuel costs by 10% 3.1.6 Improve energy efficiency of SFMTA facilities Building energy use down by over 5 percent for electricity and 16 percent for natural gas 3.1.10 Reduce Taxi Fleet emissions Applied for alternative fuel vehicle grant Action item status 0% encountering issues 40% at risk 50% on track 0% on hold 10% completed 4

Objective 3.1 other key updates Reduce the Agency and transportation system s resource consumption, emissions, waste, and noise Project achievements Installed EV Chargers in SFMTA garages Developed new fuel contract Reduced building energy consumption Forthcoming developments Updating Climate Action Strategy Developing efficiencies to further reduce energy use Procuring low-carbon vehicles for PCOs and service and passenger vehicles Challenges Additional quality control needed for fuel contract PCO electric vehicles currently on market have reliability issues Single gate-keeper for vehicle procurement data needed 5

Objective 3.2 Increase the transportation system s positive impact to the economy Key performance indicator 3.2.1 Estimated economic impact of Muni service delays (Monthly $M) Dollars ($M) 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 $4.6 $4.6 $4.7 $3.5 $3.3 $3.1 $2.6 $2.5 $2.6 $2.6 $2.2 $2.2 Apr 2013 May 2013 Jun 2013 Jul 2013 Aug 2013 Sep 2013 Oct 2013 Nov 2013 Dec 2013 Jan 2014 Feb 2014 Mar 2014 Other indicators (including most recent month, prior month, same month prior year, and fiscal year averages) ID Metric Target FY13 Avg FY14 Avg May 2013 Apr 2014 May 2014 3.2.1 Estimated economic impact of Muni service delays (Monthly $M) $3.7 $3.0 $4.6 * * *Data forthcoming. Note: Reported results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 6

Objective 3.2 action items Increase the transportation system s positive impact to the economy Key action item updates 3.2.3 Develop and implement policies for private shuttle loading/unloading to increase mode share CEQA lawsuit filed against SFMTA, other parties; Pilot network drafted; GPS reporting requirements, permitting, billing, other business processes being finalized; On-going responses to inquiries and complaints 3.2.5 Develop co-branding and merchandising opportunities with SF businesses to increase mode share and revenues Interviewing for Communications Marketing Manager in June - will be tasked with the implementation and completion of the Merchandising Program 3.2.6 Develop and implement local business and workforce opportunities in conjunction with our projects and programs Chief of Staff s office engaging with other transit agencies to develop pathways to employment within the community Action item status 0% encountering issues 25% at risk 50% on track 25% on hold 0% completed 7

Objective 3.2 other key updates Increase the transportation system s positive impact to the economy Project achievements Employer Shuttle Pilot Program approved by SFMTA Board and Board of Supervisors Outreach across agencies and organizations to educate regarding Public Outreach and Engagement Team Strategy (POETS) Forthcoming developments Official Announcement/Launch of POETS this summer Launch of SFMTA Employer Shuttle Pilot Program Initiate development of SFMTA workforce development plan Challenges CEQA Lawsuit regarding Employer Shuttle Program Clearly identify owner for workforce development plan 8

Objective 3.3 Allocate capital resources effectively Key performance indicator 3.3.1 Percentage of all capital projects delivered on-budget by phase Measure in development Other indicators (including most recent month, prior month, same month prior year, and fiscal year averages) ID Metric Target FY13 Avg FY14 Avg May 2013 Apr 2014 May 2014 Percentage of all capital projects delivered on-budget by 3.3.1 Results reporting to begin in FY14. phase 3.3.2 Percentage of all capital projects delivered on-time by phase Results reporting to begin in FY14. 9

Objective 3.3 action items Allocate capital resources effectively Key action item updates 3.3.6 Establish Pre-Development phase to determine complete scope prior to CER Reviewing current project integration procedures and ensuring they are a regular part of project initiation 3.3.7 Develop project management processes to track and keep on track the scope, schedule, and budget of all capital projects Development of draft Project Management Standard Operating Procedures manual is underway; establishing standard definitions for CIP Estimate / Baseline / Approved budgets and schedules 3.3.11 Prioritize and assign Communications staff to all SFMTA projects to oversee outreach Initiated a Public Outreach and Engagement Team Strategy (POETS) to help define a five-step approach that includes analysis of current practices & pain points, best practices, recommendations, implementation and improvement 3.3.13 Review project portfolio and propose corrective action(s) for projects exceeding baseline budget and schedule Refined performance dashboards and continued importing Sustainable Streets Division s portfolio into EcoSys software; Continued monthly workshops with Capital Projects & Construction s PMs to review project portfolios, identify areas of concern, and implement corrective actions required Action item status 0% encountering issues 8% at risk 46% on track 0% on hold 46% completed 10

Objective 3.3 other key updates Allocate capital resources effectively Key achievements Finalized Complete Streets Committee (CSC) member selection Established a Project Delivery Improvement working group to identify and create common language, operating procedures, and institutional support for all Project Delivery functions within the SFMTA Small Project Delivery Workshop conducted by Livable Streets to discuss, in an open forum, issues that hamper SFMTA from delivering small projects efficiently Forthcoming developments Initiate first training sessions for the Agency s new electronic budget & funding revision tool and paperless approval routing. Continue building five-year CIP in EcoSys and initiate scope of work with consultant to design, develop, and implement Fund Programming functionality Challenges Supporting and maintaining SFMTA s new Capital Program Controls System with limited Capital Controls staff Documenting Agency-wide standard operating procedures and providing comprehensive training to new and current employees 11

Objective 3.4 Deliver services efficiently Key performance indicator Cost per revenue hour $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 3.4.1 Average annual transit cost per revenue hour $197 $201 $209 $209 $202 $203 $162 $172 $177 $185 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 Other indicators (including most recent month, prior month, same month prior year, and fiscal year averages) ID Metric Target FY13 Avg FY14 Avg May 2013 Apr 2014 May 2014 3.4.1 Average annual transit cost per revenue hour $192 $202.67 1 3.4.2 Passengers per revenue hour for buses 67 3.4.3 Cost per unlinked trip $2.91 1 3.4.4 Pay hours: platform hours ratio 1.12 1.11 1.11 1.12 1.12 3.4.5 Farebox recovery ratio 34% 1 1 Based on preliminary unaudited financials. Note: Reported results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 12

Objective 3.4 action items Deliver services efficiently Key action item updates 3.4.1 & 3.4.2 Evaluate and implement schedule deployment efficiencies & Identify incremental opportunities to shift resources from underutilized routes to overcrowded routes and increase schedule efficiency Scarcity of part-time operators is limiting schedule efficiencies. Moving forward, hiring both part time and full time operators to maximize service hours and effectiveness. Shifting more Geary buses to the 38L Geary Limited line starting June 7 to address crowding. Planning to implement first service increase in October 2014 with a focus on reducing overcrowded routes like the 28 19 th Avenue and 44 O Shaughnessy. 3.4.8 Assess number of vehicles needed to reduce fleet age and introduce regular replacement schedule 112 new buses currently operational and an RFP is out to replace Neoplan fleet. First articulated trolley coaches to arrive by end of 2014 and articulated motor coaches to arrive shortly thereafter. RFP for light rail replacement and expansion to be awarded this summer. Full replacement funded and mid-life rehabilitations being incorporated into the capital budget for all vehicles. Action item status 0% encountering issues 5% at risk 82% on track 0% on hold 14% completed 13

Objective 3.4 other key updates Deliver services efficiently Project achievements Major progress on fleet replacement and rehabilitation Transit has reorganized internal support shops Transit and SSD Paint Shops will be combined starting July 1 Shifting resources from the 38 Local to 38 Limited on June 7 Continual review and upgrading of bus and rail maintenance techniques and practices Eleven focused rehabilitation programs on rail including on-going Breda rehabilitation Forthcoming developments First service improvements and expansions scheduled for October 2014 New articulated trolley coaches will start arriving by end of 2014 New articulated motor coaches will start arriving in early 2015 Award of LRV replacement and expansion contract Completion of Neoplan rehabilitation program this summer Mid-life rehabilitation for Orion buses (86 vehicles) Challenges Operator availability limits our ability to maximize part time operators and reduce overtime On-going issues related to sick leave Older fleet hinders service performance 14

Goal 3 financials Expenditures (FY14 as of April 2014) EXPENDITURES Revised Budget (1) Date Actuals: Year to Encumbrances Total Projection for the Year (2) Saving/(Overage) SFMTA Agency Wide $88,814,116 $54,770,241 $23,240,618 $86,398,894 $2,415,222 Board of Directors $753,855 $430,655 $4,865 $525,302 $228,553 Capital Programs and Construction $549,776 ($5,950,229) $1,597,479 $549,776 $0 Communications $4,242,321 $2,623,748 $201,708 $4,161,332 $80,988 Director of Transportation $1,788,046 $1,021,901 $197,120 $1,610,426 $177,620 Finance and Information Technology $73,628,196 $51,162,077 $12,886,092 $73,102,384 $525,812 Government Affairs $683,204 $436,224 $140,890 $672,949 $10,255 Human Resources $28,017,155 $19,324,204 $4,345,459 $27,371,051 $646,104 Safety $5,151,056 $2,651,653 $192,610 $4,247,823 $903,233 Sustainable Streets (3) $162,279,275 $107,093,773 $20,340,089 $148,207,221 $14,072,054 Transit Services (3) $529,742,617 $415,686,631 $49,477,260 $549,873,917 ($20,131,300) Taxi and Accessible Services $28,422,321 $16,611,645 $9,620,150 $27,317,319 $1,105,001 TOTAL $924,071,938 $665,862,523 $122,244,340 $924,038,395 $33,543 Note: (1) The revised budget includes supplemental for the 2 non-profit garages, 5 th & Mission and Ellis O Farrell, whose ownership is now with SFMTA. (2) Expenditures projection is based on all encumbrance spent in FY2014, without carry forward to next fiscal year. 15

Goal 3 financials Revenues (FY14 as of April 2014) REVENUE Revised Budget (1) Year to Date for the Year Surplus/(Deficit) Actuals Total Projection TRANSIT FARES Cable Car Fares $25,303,000 $23,125,879 $27,224,787 $1,921,787 Cash Fares $72,520,900 $69,536,537 $85,249,236 $12,728,336 Other Fares $5,968,200 $5,524,785 $6,849,695 $881,495 Passes $92,612,434 $79,412,121 $92,612,434 $0 TRANSIT FARES Total $196,404,534 $177,599,322 $211,936,151 $15,531,617 PARKING FEES & FINES General Fund Baseline Transfer $66,600,000 $65,968,000 $66,600,000 $0 Citations and Fines $102,441,800 $87,340,869 $102,441,800 $0 Garage Revenue $61,190,575 $56,021,255 $64,636,247 $3,445,672 Meter Revenue $46,188,400 $49,582,371 $56,188,400 $10,000,000 Permit Revenue $12,631,900 $11,554,731 $12,631,900 $0 PARKING FEES & FINES Total $289,052,675 $270,467,227 $302,498,347 $13,445,672 Operating Grants $115,702,102 $96,063,506 $131,302,190 $15,600,088 Taxi Service $10,225,913 $12,349,163 $13,802,755 $3,576,842 Other Revenues $23,991,672 $25,258,984 $26,792,963 $2,801,291 General Fund Transfer $232,000,000 $232,000,000 $236,200,000 $4,200,000 Prior Year Fund Balance Carry Forward $59,895,279 $59,895,279 $59,895,279 $0 TOTAL $927,272,175 $873,633,480 $982,427,685 $55,155,510 Note: (1) The revised budget includes supplemental for the 2 non-profit garages, 5 th & Mission and Ellis O Farrell, whose ownership is now with SFMTA. 16

Goal 3 financials Overtime Report (FY14 as of April 2014) FUND/DIVISION ANNUAL REVISED BUDGET ACTUALS FISCAL YEAR TO DATE* PROJECTION FOR REMAINING MONTHS ** END OF YEAR PROJECTION SURPLUS (DEFICIT) OPERATING FUND TRANSIT SERVICES DIVISION Transit Operators $23,151,569 $21,889,716 $4,807,554 $26,697,270 ($3,545,701) Transit Vehicle Maintenance $6,786,456 $9,336,655 $2,050,574 $11,387,229 ($4,600,773) Transit All Others $4,516,632 $8,755,751 $1,922,992 $10,678,744 ($6,162,112) Subtotal Transit Services Division $34,454,657 $39,982,123 $8,781,120 $48,763,243 ($14,308,586) SUSTAINABLE STREETS DIVISION Parking Control Officers $928,043 $1,282,159 $281,596 $1,563,754 ($635,711) Sustainable Streets All Others $762,576 $525,317 $115,373 $640,690 $121,886 Subtotal Sustainable Streets Division $1,690,619 $1,807,476 $396,969 $2,204,445 ($513,826) SFMTA AGENCY WIDE*** $0 $260,275 $0 $260,275 ($260,275) ALL OTHER DIVISIONS $889,774 $809,252 $177,733 $986,985 ($97,211) TOTAL OPERATING FUND $37,035,050 $42,859,126 $9,355,822 $52,214,948 ($15,179,898) NON OPERATING FUND Capital Programs & Construction $0 $1,104,393 $179,818 $1,284,211 ($1,284,211) Sustainable Streets Engineering Programs $0 $209,383 $45,986 $255,369 ($255,369) Total Non-Operating Fund $0 $1,313,776 $225,804 $1,539,580 ($1,539,580) TOTAL $37,035,050 $44,172,902 $9,581,627 $53,754,528 ($16,719,478) *Figures include cost recovery for events or services totaling $1.76 million as of month-end (April 2014). The amount includes reimbursements for payroll (both regular and overtime), overhead, and other non-labor costs as applicable. **Projection for Remaining Months is calculated average of actuals year-to-date (year-to-date actual overtime labor cost divided by the numbers of pay periods as of the reporting period) multiplied by the remaining periods. *** Charges are all related to America's Cup. 17

Objective 3.5 Reduce capital and operating structural deficits Key performance indicator Millions $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 3.5.1 Operating and capital structural deficit FY12 $70 FY13 $70 FY14 $35 FY12 $260 FY13 $260 FY14 $260 Additional $1.7B 5-year shortfall for bike, pedestrian, facilities and transit $0 Operations SOGR Other indicators (including most recent month, prior month, same month prior year, and fiscal year averages) ID Metric Target FY14 Avg Make progress towards $35M additional needed for operations, $260M additional needed Operating and capital structural closing operating and 3.5.1 for State-of-Good Repair (SOGR) and $1.7B 5-Year shortfall for deficit mission critical capital bike, pedestrian, facilities and transit (FY14) structural deficit Note: Reported results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 18

Objective 3.5 action items Reduce capital and operating structural deficits Key action item updates 3.5.1 Develop operating needs of each function based on output and aligned to Strategic Plan FY 15-16 operating budget has been aligned to the extent possible to support divisional functions to meet strategic plan actions, including 10% Muni service increase 3.5.3 Secure funding to increase State of Good Repair budget to at least $250 million annually MTC approved Transit Core Capacity Program; GO Bond to be placed on November 2014 ballot; Issued $100 m in revenue bonds and commercial paper; Continue to work on Cap and Trade and other revenues 3.5.11 Reduce claims and workers compensation by 5% each year Reduced worker s compensation budget by $2 million annually to reflect projected decreases in costs; Worker s compensation costs budgeted by division completed; Entered into a third party provider contract with the rest of the City Action item status 0% encountering issues 0% at risk 92% on track 0% on hold 8% completed 19

Objective 3.5 other key updates Reduce capital and operating structural deficits Project achievements FY 15 and FY 16 operating and capital budgets balanced November 2014 Ballot to include $500 million Transportation General Obligation Bond New Advertising Agreement for vehicles: $100 million over 15 years Ratings upgrades will reduce debt service costs on revenue bonds Forthcoming developments Issue Revenue Bonds in late 2014, early 2015 November 2014 Ballot measure outcome Work with region on cap and trade revenues to transportation Potential future sales tax and/or VLF Finalize Transportation Sustainability Program and Fee (TSP) Develop properties Challenges Operating additional need for existing service level and growth unidentified $260M annual State-of-Good Repair (SOGR) deficit. $10 billion in capital need through 2030 of which $3.7 billion has been identified; Additional $1 billion in General Obligation Bonds for November 2014 ballot; Gap = $5.3 billion gap 20

Goal 1 metrics Create a safer transportation experience for everyone Objective 1.1 Improve security for transportation system users Objective 1.2 Improve workplace safety and security Objective 1.3 Improve the safety of the transportation system 21

Goal 1 metrics Key performance indicators Crimes per 100,000 miles 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1.1.1 SFPD-reported Muni-related crimes/100,000 miles 80 16 Target Larcenies, robberies, thefts 9.97 13.6 14 8.82 8.5 8.31 60 12 7.53 10 8.19 Dec 2013 Jan 2014 Feb 2014 Mar 2014 Apr 2014 May 2014 40 20 0 Larcenies, robberies and thefts Injuries per 200,000 hours 8 6 4 2 0 1.2.1 Workplace injuries/200,000 hours 9.0 Target 9.3 10.3 11.1 14.7 Nov 2013 Dec 2013 Jan 2014 Feb 2014 Mar 2014 Apr 2014 1.3.1 Muni collisions/100,000 miles Collisions per 100,000 miles 8 6 4 2 0 6.75 5.74 4.62 Target 6.12 4.89 4.78 Nov 2013 Dec 2013 Jan 2014 Feb 2014 Mar 2014 Apr 2014 Note: Reported results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 22

Goal 2 metrics Make transit, walking, bicycling, taxi, ridesharing and carsharing the preferred means of travel Objective 2.1 Improve customer service and communications Objective 2.2 Improve transit performance Objective 2.3 Increase use of all non-private auto modes Objective 2.4 Improve parking utilization and manage parking demand 23

Goal 2 metrics Key performance indicators Weighted Response % 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2.1.1 Customer rating: Overall customer satisfaction with transit services; scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high) FY14 Q2 7% 8% Very Dissatisfied FY14 Q3 25% 21% 29% 38% 34% 28% 6% 6% Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very Satisfied <28 day resolution rate 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 2.1.7 Percentage of actionable 311 Muni-related complaints addressed within 28 days 71% 56% 57% 59% 76% 90% Oct 2013 Nov 2013 Dec 2013 Jan 2014 Feb 2014 Mar 2014 Percentage of arrivals 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2.2.1 Percentage of transit trips with + 5 min gaps on Rapid Network Target 17.7% 17.5% 17.1% 17.1% 18.4% 20.7% Dec 2013 Jan 2014 Feb 2014 Mar 2014 Apr 2014 May 2014 Percentage of arrivals 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% 2.2.1 Percentage of transit trips with <2 min bunching on Rapid Network (<1 min for headways of 5 min or Target less) 5.4% 5.5% 5.6% 5.2% 5.3% 4.9% Dec 2013 Jan 2014 Feb 2014 Mar 2014 Apr 2014 May 2014 1 Results are based on a non-probability sample from opt-in SFMTA online survey conducted in 11/13 and 12/13 and are weighted to reflect the geographic distribution of San Francisco s population. Note: Reported results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 24

Goal 2 metrics Key performance indicators continued 2.3.1 Non-private auto mode share (2011 all trips) 2.4.1 Parking reliability rate of SFpark spaces 1 Percentage of trips 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 55% 21% 19% 3.5% 1.50% Driving Transit Walking Biking Taxis Reliability rate 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 76.8% 79.4% 79.6% 73.0% 72.1% 70.0% Jul 2013 Aug 2013 Sep 2013 Oct 2013 Nov 2013 Dec 2013 1 Due to street sensor removal, occupancy-based parking measures will not be reported after Dec 2013. Note: Reported results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 25

Goal 4 metrics Create a workplace that delivers outstanding service Objective 4.1 Improve internal communications Objective 4.2 Create a collaborative and innovative work environment Objective 4.3 Improve employee accountability Objective 4.4 Improve relationships and partnerships with our stakeholders 26

Goal 4 metrics Key performance indicators 4.1.1 Employee rating: I have the info and tools I need to do my job; I have access to info about Agency accomplishments, current events, issues and challenges; scale of 1 (high) to 5 (low) 3.45, 3.40 (FY13) 4.2.1 Employee rating: Overall employee satisfaction; scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high) 3.36 (FY13) 4.3.1 Percentage of employees with performance plans prepared by start of fiscal year 4.3.1 Percentage of employees with annual appraisals based on their performance plans 62.5% (FY14) 18.8% (FY13) Note: Reported results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 27

Goal 4 metrics Key performance indicators continued 4.4.1 Stakeholder rating: satisfaction with SFMTA decision-making process/communications; scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high) Survey will be conducted in 2014. 28