Enterprise and Industry SBA Fact Sheet 2012

Similar documents
2014 SBA Fact Sheet. United Kingdom. In a nutshell. About the SBA Fact Sheets 1

2017 SBA Fact Sheet Serbia

SBA Fact Sheet SLOVAKIA 09

2017 SBA Fact Sheet Turkey

2014 SBA Fact Sheet NORWAY. In a nutshell. About the SBA Fact Sheets 1

2017 SBA Fact Sheet Lithuania

2014 SBA Fact Sheet FRANCE. In a nutshell. About the SBA Fact Sheets 1

2017 SBA Fact Sheet. Key points. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. About the SBA fact sheets. Number of persons employed in SMEs

2016 SBA Fact Sheet Spain

2017 SBA Fact Sheet Sweden

2017 SBA Fact Sheet Greece

Screening report. Serbia

Council of the European Union Brussels, 25 August 2016 (OR. en) Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

ACCESS TO FINANCE FOR SMEs: THE COMMISSION ACTION PLAN AND POLICY CHALLENGES AHEAD

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the document. Proposal for a Council Directive

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, COM(2011) 870 final

High-Technology Trade Indicators 2008

Monitoring SMEs performance in Europe Indicators fit for purpose Methodological note

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT VENTURE CAPITAL FUND

PROPOSED COMMISSION PROGRAMME ON COMPETITIVENESS OF ENTERPRISE AND SMEs (COSME)

2015 SBA Fact Sheet Italy

Rural Development Programmes. Financial Instruments: making funding go further

Innovation Window. Technology Transfer Fund(s) / Accelerator Fund(s). The financial instrument(s) must be established as a closed-end fund.

PLAN OF MEASURES TO DRIVE GROWTH, COMPETITIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY

The Small Business Act (SBA)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR RESEARCH & INNOVATION

Finland. Total exports as a % of GDP (2013) Innovation Union Scoreboard (2013) N.A. (2007) Trade integration in the single market (2013)

UEAPME Think Small Test

Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) Country Report Romania

IRELAND NEEDS A WAGE INCREASE

Finland. Overview EIB INVESTMENT SURVEY

Leana Ugrinovska Cabinet of the Deputy Prime Minister for Economic Affairs The Government of Republic of Macedonia

Survey on the Access to Finance of Enterprises in the euro area. April to September 2017

Evaluation questions are shown in blue and will be deleted once we upload the questionnaires

Monitoring SMEs performance in Europe

Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2018

EUROPE S SOURCES OF GROWTH

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR RESEARCH & INNOVATION

EIBIS 2016 Ireland. Country Overview

Administrative and support service statistics - NACE Rev. 2

HORIZON The New EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Brendan Hawdon DG Research & Innovation European Commission

The EU Framework Programme For Research and Innovation ( )

Improving the business environment for SMEs through effective regulation

The EU Framework Programme For Research And Innovation ( )

Horizon 2020 & Smart Specialisation

C 3 INNOVATION BEHAVIOUR IN THE GERMAN PRIVATE SECTOR

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities DG DRAFT NOTE ON

SMEs and UK growth: the opportunity for regional economies. November 2018

Joint Research Centre

Tax Law Newsletter. January 2013

INDICATIVE TERM SHEET. Mezzanine / Growth Fund. This Indicative Term Sheet is structured of:

CONTENTS. Topic At A Glance A free trade area with the EU: what does it mean for Georgia? 4

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

SME and Entrepreneurship Financing: Policy Responses to the Global Crisis and the way forward to recovery

SURVEY ON THE ACCESS TO FINANCE OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES IN THE EURO AREA APRIL TO SEPTEMBER 2012

Horizon The EU Framework Programme for Luigi Scarpa de Masellis. Delegation of the EU to Canada. Research and Innovation

ANNEX 2 to the Call for Expression of Interest No JER-00. Part I: Description of the Financial F

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Austria. Overview EIB INVESTMENT SURVEY

Germany. Overview EIB INVESTMENT SURVEY

SERBIA. Support to participation in EU Programmes. Action Summary INSTRUMENT FOR PRE-ACCESSION ASSISTANCE (IPA II)

EX-POST EVALUATION OF LATE PAYMENT DIRECTIVE

MicroBank. Facilitating the access to microfinance

Horizon The EU Framework Programme for Katerina PTACKOVA. DG RTD/Directorate Energy/Unit K.4. Research and Innovation

2018 SBA Fact Sheet Cyprus

Economic Outlook. Global And Finnish. Technology Industries In Finland Significant growth in the value of orders due to ship orders s.

Upgrading business investment

Opening slide. Good morning Ladies and Gentlemen,

AFME Response to European Commission Consultation on the EU2020 Industrial Policy Flagship Initiative

Semi-Annual Report 2004.

DEFENCE DATA

Portugal. Overview EIB INVESTMENT SURVEY

Summary Report Responses to the public consultation on the special scheme for small enterprises under the VAT Directive

IMPACT INDICATORS. Research, Innovation, ICT and broadband, SMEs Competitiveness

EU Funds in Central and Eastern Europe

Analysis of the first phase of the Funding for Growth Scheme

R & D expenditure. Statistics Explained. Main statistical findings

Financial year 2015: KfW s promotional business rises to EUR 79.3 billion due to strong demand

DEFINITION OF MICRO, SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES

INVEST IN CROATIA. Agency for Investments and Competitiveness

Selling to Foreign Markets: a Portrait of OECD Exporters. by Sónia Araújo and Eric Gonnard. Unlocking the potential of trade microdata

ANNEX 2 to the Call for Expression of Interest No JER-009/1 Financial Instrument: Description and Selection Criteria

European Union. Overview EIB INVESTMENT SURVEY

EU public consultation on INTERREG EUROPE 10 January 2014

Study on the framework conditions for High Growth Innovative Enterprises (HGIEs)

New EC initiatives for SMEs funding in Europe

Survey on the access to finance of enterprises in the euro area. October 2014 to March 2015

ECONOMIC AND POLICY CONTEXT...

Content. Macroeconomics. Banking Sector in Bulgaria. Raiffeisen Bank International. Raiffeisenbank (Bulgaria) EAD. Page 2

Potential Output in Denmark

Towards Horizon 2020

Improving the EU Input-Output Database for Global Trade Analysis: the EU-GTAP Project

(Science-based)Entrepreneurship in the EU policy agenda

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

/JordanStrategyForumJSF Jordan Strategy Forum. Amman, Jordan T: F:

EIBIS Luxembourg. Country Overview

for industrial sector Manufacturing of medical, precision and optical apparatus and instruments Annex to the EXPORT STRATEGY

(2) The CIP programme entrepreneurship and innovation (p.m.) 2 ;

OPIC , 2014BG16RFOP002 March Operational Programme Innovation and Competitiveness

RIO Country Report 2015: Luxembourg

Transcription:

EN Enterprise and Industry SBA Fact Sheet 2012 BULGARIA In a nutshell Bulgarian SMEs tend to be larger across all size classes than their EU peers The sector they are most likely to be active in is trade, rather than services, as in the EU as a whole The Bulgarian SME sector has stabilised after the crisis with noticeably more businesses, jobs and value added than the EU as a whole compared with the base year 2005 Important policy measures have been introduced, but Bulgaria still lags behind in five SBA areas About the SBA Fact Sheets 1 The Small Business Act for Europe (SBA) is the EU s flagship policy initiative to support small and mediumsized enterprises (SMEs). The aim of the annually updated Fact Sheets is to improve understanding of recent trends and national policies affecting SMEs. Since 2011, each EU Member State has appointed a high-ranking government official as its national SME envoy. SME envoys spearhead the implementation of the SBA agenda in their country. 1. SMEs in Bulgaria basic figures Number of Enterprises Employment Value added Bulgaria EU27 Bulgaria EU27 Bulgaria EU27 Number Share Share Number Share Share Billion Share Share Micro 278.139 90,6% 92,2% 548.220 29,1% 29,6% 3 16,5% 21,2% Small 23.950 7,8% 6,5% 466.560 24,8% 20,6% 4 21,0% 18,5% Medium-sized 4.345 1,4% 1,1% 410.999 21,8% 17,2% 4 24,4% 18,4% SMEs 306.434 99,8% 99,8% 1.425.779 75,7% 67,4% 11 61,9% 58,1% Large 681 0,2% 0,2% 456.581 24,3% 32,6% 7 38,1% 41,9% Total 307.115 100,0% 100,0% 1.882.360 100,0% 100,0% 18 100,0% 100,0% Estimates for 2011, based on 2005-2009 figures from the Structural Business Statistics Database (Eurostat). The estimates have been produced by Cambridge Econometrics.The data cover the 'business economy' which includes industry, construction, trade, and services (NACE Rev. 2 Sections B to J, L, M and N). The data does not cover the enterprises in agriculture, forestry, fishing or the largely nonmarket services such as education and health. The advantage of using Eurostat data is that the statistics from different countries have been harmonised and are comparable across countries. The disadvantage is that for some countries these data may be different from data published by national authorities. Bulgaria's SME sector matches the EU average regarding its share of the total number of businesses. But it accounts for more jobs (75.7 % of the total (EU average: 67.5 %) and value added -- 61.9 % (EU: 58.4 %). Within the SME sector, there are fewer micro-enterprises than in the EU overall, and they create less value added than their EU peers. But they have a similar contribution to employment, as they tend to be larger in size, a trait common to the SME sector in general. In Bulgaria, SMEs are much more likely to be active in trade than in the EU as a whole, with a 46 % share of the total (EU average: 30 %). However, only 33 % of jobs and 27 % of value added can be attributed to trade, suggesting that this sector is characterised by small-scale and relatively unproductive companies. Industry and construction SMEs account for a relatively greater share of employment and value added. Bulgarian SMEs are less specialised in high tech industries and knowledge-intensive services than their EU peers. They account for 1 % and 17 % of the total number of enterprises respectively, against an EU average of 2 % and 28 %. In terms of recent (2005-2012) developments, Bulgarian SMEs show a consistent picture as regards their total number, employment and value added, the three indicators examined here. Until the onset of the crisis in 2008, they experienced strong growth, and, in the case of value added, really 1

SME trends in Bulgaria 3 140 130 120 110 100 90 Number of enterprises (Index: 2005=100, estimations as from 2010 onwards) 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010e 2011e 2012e remarkable growth, then a decline that turned to stagnation from 2010 onwards 2. Only value added shows signs of recovering and growing again. The same is not the case for the number of businesses and employment levels. However, the latter have stabilised at much higher levels in Bulgaria than in the EU as a whole. Importantly, over the years 2005-2012, estimates show that SMEs consistently outperform large companies across all three indicators. SMEs in Bulgaria SMEs in the EU Employment in enterprises (Index: 2005=100, estimations as from 2010 onwards) 120 110 100 90 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010e 2011e 2012e SMEs in Bulgaria SMEs in the EU Value-added of SMEs (Index: 2005=100, estimates from 2010 on) 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010e 2011e 2012e SMEs in Bulgaria SMEs in the EU 2

2. Bulgaria s SBA profile Bulgaria EU average +/- 0,5 standard deviations 1. Entrepreneurship 10. Internationalization 9. Environment 8. Skills and innovation 7. Single market 1,0 0,8 0,6 0,4 0,2 0,0 6. Access to finance 2. Second chance 3. Think small first 4. Responsive administration 5. State aid & public procurement Overall, the data shows a profile that leaves room for improvement, despite a good performance in the areas of 'Access to finance' and 'State aid and public procurement'. Scores for five other areas, 'Second chance', 'Environment', 'Internationalisation', 'Entrepreneurship' and 'Skills and innovation' are clearly below the EU average, casting a shadow over the overall performance. For 'Responsive administration', the result is in line with the EU average. There are encouraging signs of improvement for 'Responsive administration', 'Skills and innovation' and 'Second chance', while the trend appears to be negative for 'Internationalisation' and 'Single market'. From a policy 4 point of view, while the government has not yet adopted a national strategy to implement the Small Business Act, significant measures have been taken, especially in the areas of 'Responsive administration', 'Single market' and 'Think small first'. Bulgaria s SBA performance: Status quo and development over 2007-2012 5 Progress over time (Compound annual growth rate 2007-2012) Low Performance, Progress 9 8 10 Low performance, Deterioration 1 2 4 7 6 5 High Performance, Progress High Performance, Deterioration -2,5-1,5-0,5 0,5 1,5 2,5 Performance (Distance from the EU average, in standard deviations, EU avg.=0) 15% 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% Legend: 1. Entrepreneurship 2. Second chance 3. Think small first 4. Responsive administration 5. State aid & public procurement 6. Access to finance 7. Single market 8. Skills and innovation 9. Environment 10. Internationalization Note: Due to a lack of data, it is not possible to calculate the performance for Area 3. Similarly, no progress rate could be calculated for Area 9 - Environment. In the graph to the left, the progress rate was set to 0% by default, for all countries. 3

I. Entrepreneurship Distance from the EU-average (measured in standard deviations, EU-average=0) Self employment rate (% of total employment); 2010; Bulgaria: 11; EU-avg: 14 Entrepreneurship rate (% of adults who have started a business or are taking the steps to start one); 2009; Bulgaria: 10; EU-avg: 12 Opportunity-driven entrepreneurship (% of entrepreneurs); 2009; Bulgaria: 38; EU-avg: 55 Preference for self-employment (% of adults who would prefer to be selfemployed); 2009; Bulgaria: 50; EU-avg: 45 Feasibility of becoming self-employed (% of adults who think it is feasible to become self-employed); 2009; Bulgaria: 21; EU-avg: 28 Share of adults who agree that school education helped them develop an entrepreneurial attitude (%); 2009; Bulgaria: 47; EU-avg: 49-2,0-1,5-1,0-0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 Note: Data bars pointing right show stronger than EU-average performance and data bars pointing left show weaker performance. Bulgaria is behind the EU average for 'Entrepreneurship', with one exception: exactly half of all Bulgarians state a preference for being selfemployed, against an EU average of 45 %. However, only 38 % of Bulgarian entrepreneurs say they went into business to exploit an opportunity, suggesting that a lack of alternatives is the reason behind their choice. Furthermore, only 21 % of adults (EU average: 28 %) think it is possible for them to become self-employed, which might help to explain why the self-employment rate is also lower than the EU average. The remaining indicators do not vary significantly from the mean. On the policy front, the Strategy for Creative Industries was adopted in 2011. It contains measures which support the promotion of entrepreneurship in 23 Bulgarian art and crafts schools. Young artists and artisans will receive training in entrepreneurial skills and management, so that they will be able to start their own business. Furthermore, a Training Firms Network has been developed by the Bulgarian Centre for Training Firms within the Ministry of Education and Science. To date, 312 students firms from 43 cities in Bulgaria have become members of the Network. The training firms are managed by students, and they are registered, structured internally, pay taxes and operate like a real company. They also make deals with other training firms from both Bulgaria and the World Training Firms Net EUROPEN/ PENINTERNATIONAL. 4

II. Second chance Bulgaria scores below average in this area. Closing a business there takes more than three years (EU average: two years). The cost of closing and the degree of support for a second chance are in line with the EU average. Policy-wise, the issue of simplification and speeding up insolvency procedures has been debated and investigated by the government, but as of the beginning of 2012, no decisions had been made. III. Think small first The only available indicator on the burden of government regulations suggests that Bulgaria performs in line with its EU peers; however, the limited data does not allow any general conclusions. From a policy point of view, an important decision has been taken: from now on, an impact assessment of all legislation with significant influence over the business environment will be carried out. The plan is to fund the impact assessment of new or amended pieces of legislation through the Operational Programme Administrative Capacity. 5

IV. Responsive administration Bulgaria performs within the EU average as regards 'Responsive administration'. However, it would have done far better if it were not for one particular indicator: it takes Bulgarian companies one and an half times longer to pay taxes than on average in the EU. The other indicators paint a far more positive picture, with the exception of the time to start a business 6 and the availability of on-line public services, for which the scores are slightly below average. Bulgaria is the least expensive place in the EU to start a business. The minimum capital required is very low, and it is quicker and relatively cheap to transfer property. An important policy measure was taken in 2011 and is described in detail in section 3, as best practice. V. State aid and Public procurement 6

Bulgaria s overall score is ahead of the EU average in this area. However, its performance is uneven across different indicators. Bulgaria scores highly in awarding public contracts to SMEs. In all, 78 % of the total goes to them, while in the EU overall, the percentage rate is exactly half that. Bulgaria is also above average in allocating EU agricultural funds for business creation and development, while it lags behind in the allocation of regional funds to entrepreneurship and SMEs, and also in the availability of e-procurement. Finally, the share of state aid earmarked for SMEs almost exactly matches the EU average. No major policy measure were recorded in 2011 or in the first quarter of 2012 in this area. VI. Access to finance Bulgaria beats the EU average for Access to finance. However, Bulgarian stakeholders such as business associations still say access to finance is one of their main concerns. This apparent contradiction can be explained by the fact that some of the indicators here measure not the situation, but rather the change since last year. Going into detail, Bulgaria commands a good credit information system and only 13 % of respondents said banks were less willing than before to provide a loan in 2011, against 27 % in the EU as a whole. All other indicators (measuring the percentage of loan applications rejected, access to public financial support and the interest rate difference between small and larger loans) can be considered average or slightly better, with the exception of the share of working capital investment. Therefore, it can generally be said that Bulgarian SMEs enjoy a good climate with regard to access to finance, a very important factor in the current economic circumstances in Europe. On the policy front, in 2011, the European Investment Fund (EIF) selected financial intermediaries for the Venture Capital Fund, the Growth Capital Fund, the Mezzanine Fund and the First Loss Portfolio Guarantee Financial Instrument. Following agreement with the EIF, the financial intermediaries will offer financing on preferential terms to over 3 400 SMEs across Bulgaria. The total amount available is 400 million. Both start-ups and 7

existing enterprises that plan to expand their businesses will be eligible. VII. Single market The aggregate result for this area puts Bulgaria within the EU average, but single indicators present a polarised picture. On the one hand, Bulgaria performs well in terms of transposition of EU legislation, with no directive overdue for longer than two years. Only one Single market directive has not yet been transposed. The time taken to transpose is below average. On the other hand, the figures for intra-eu trade are below average, as 6 % of Bulgarian SMEs import from within the EU and 3 % export to it, against 17 % and 7 % for the EU overall. In 2011, there has been policy action on standardisation, to help Bulgarian SMEs to comply with European standards, make them more competitive, better able to stand in the EU and international market and to export to them. The Bulgarian Standardisation Institute (BSI) started implementing a project financed by the Operational Programme Development of the Competitiveness of the Bulgarian Economy and is promoting this with information campaigns. The campaigns cover the whole country and are divided into theoretical seminars, specialised seminars for selected standards and round tables. In specialised seminars, the institute offers participants the opportunity to buy standards at a discounted price. For example, discounted standards were offered in seminars on light and lighting, safety rules for the construction and installation of lifts, safety of machinery, and quality management systems. 8

VIII. Skills and innovation Bulgaria is clearly behind the EU average for Skills and innovation. Only one indicator, Sales of new-tomarket or new-to-firm innovations, is in line with the EU average. All others are below par. On workforce training, only 29 % of Bulgarian enterprises provide it, and just 3 % of employees participate. The picture is also negative for the single-digit percentage of SMEs buying or selling online, and for SMEs introducing innovations, collaborating with other innovative SMEs, and participating in EU-funded research. However, there are encouraging signs the situation is improving. Policy-wise, several grant schemes were launched in 2011 under the operational programme Development of the Competitiveness of the Bulgarian Economy. They support the introduction of innovative products, services or processes and the development of a national pro-innovation structure. Two grant schemes are already active. One targets the development of innovations by start-up companies, the other aims to strengthen existing technology centres and to develop new ones. Putting together applications under these grant schemes is complex, so the schemes are openended and several sessions are planned to assess submissions. 9

IX. Environment Bulgaria does not score well in comparison with the EU as a whole. This is clearly an area with room for improvement. Innovations with environmental benefits score only a quarter of the EU average. Only 2 % of Bulgaria's SMEs have benefited from public support to increase their resource efficiency, and 85 % of them have taken measures to increase it (EU average: 93 %). Still below par, but less dramatically so, is the share of SMEs that offer green products or services. The percentage of SMEs that see most of their turnover generated by green products and that have benefited from public support to produce them is within the EU average. On the policy front, the Managing Authority of the EU-financed Operational Programme Development of the Competitiveness of the Bulgarian Economy, has launched a grant scheme to support SMEs purchasing new equipment. According to the scheme guidelines, SMEs which introduce EMAS (Eco-Management and Audit Scheme) and ISO 14000 standards receive the highest level of support. 10

X. Internationalisation Bulgaria s overall results are below the EU average, but single indicators show a more nuanced picture. The percentage of Bulgarian SMEs exporting outside the EU is below average, but not dramatically so, while those importing from outside the EU is in line with the average. The number of documents required for extra-eu trade is close to the average. The real reason for Bulgaria's lacklustre performance is the high cost and the amount of time required to trade outside the EU: 1670 US dollars and 17 days to import (EU average: 1101 US dollars and 11 days) and 2012 US dollars and 21 days to export (EU average: 1032 US dollars and 11 days). There is clearly ample scope for regulatory improvement. In 2011, no important policy action was reported in this area. 11

3. Good practice To show what the government is doing to promote SMEs, we include an example of good practice. In 2011, tacit approval became the rule for all registration regimes. This rule represents a sweeping change for many cases where registration is needed: it will eliminate the risk of delays and long waiting times which can hamper an activity, and even discourage a business from undertaking it. If on the stipulated deadline there is no answer by the relevant authority, the registration is considered as accepted; furthermore, only in specific cases, for example construction activities, the responsible institutions can set an administrative deadline for the registration. This rule will reduce the regulatory burden and shorten the time necessary for the start of business initiatives, thereby allowing for faster business set-up and development. About the SBA Fact Sheets The Small Business Act (SBA) Fact Sheets are produced by DG ENTR as part of the SME Performance Review, which is its main vehicle providing an economic analysis of SME issues. They combine the latest available statistical and policy information for the 27 EU Member States and another ten non-member countries. They also feed in to the EU s Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP). The Fact Sheets produced annually help to marshal the available information to facilitate SME policy assessments and monitor SBA implementation. For example, the Fact Sheets cite only those policy measures deemed relevant by local SME policy experts. They do not, and cannot, reflect all measures taken by the government over the reference period. More policy information can be found on a database accessible from the SPR website. Please also see the end notes overleaf. For more information SME Performance Review: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/facts-figures-analysis/performance-review/index_en.htm Small Business Act: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/small-business-act/index_en.htm The European Small Business Portal: http://ec.europa.eu/small-business/index_en.htm Entr-SPR@ec.europa.eu 12

1 The SBA Fact Sheets 2012 benefited substantially from input by the European Commission s Joint Research Centre (JRC) in Ispra, Italy. The JRC made major improvements to the methodological approach, statistical work on the dataset and the visual presentation of the data. 2 The indicators measuring the number and contribution to employment and value added of the hightechnology SMEs in the manufacturing industries and knowledge intensive SMEs in the service sectors were calculated following the Eurostat definition on High-technology and knowledge based services aggregations based on NACE Rev. 2. For more information please see: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ity_sdds/annexes/htec_esms_an3.pdf 3 The three graphs below describe the trend over time for the variables. They consist of index values for the years since 2005, with the base year 2005 set at a value of 100. As from 2010, the graphs show estimates of the development over time, based on 2005-2009 figures from the Structural Business Statistics Database (Eurostat). The estimates were produced by Cambridge Econometrics. The data cover the business economy, which includes industry, construction, trade, and services (NACE Rev. 2 Sections B to J, L, M, N). The data do not cover enterprises in agriculture, forestry, fishing or largely non-market services, such as education and health. A detailed methodology can be consulted at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/facts-figures-analysis/performance-review/index_en.htm. 4 The policy measures presented in this SBA Fact Sheet may only be a selection of the measures taken by the Government in 2011 and the first three months of 2012. The selection was made by the SME policy country expert contracted by Ecorys (DG ENTR s lead contractor for the 2012 Fact Sheets). The experts were asked only to select those measures that, in their view, were the most important, i.e. were expected to have the highest impact in the specific SBA area. The complete range of measures that the experts compiled in the framework of producing this years Fact Sheets will be published in the form of a policy database on the DG ENTR website alongside the Fact Sheets. 5 The quadrant chart combines two sets of information: firstly it shows the status quo performance based on data for the latest available years. This information is plotted along the X-axis measured in standard deviations of the simple, non-weighted arithmetical average for EU-27. The vertical corridor marked by the dotted lines defines the EU average. Secondly, it reveals progress over time, i.e. the average annual growth rates for the period 2007-2012. The growth rates are those of the individual indicators which make up the SBA area averages. Hence, the location of a particular SBA area average in any of the 4 quadrants, provides not only status quo information about where the country is located in this SBA area relative to the rest of the EU at a given point in time, but also to the extent of progress made in the period 2007-2012. 6 The start-up indicators are based on World Bank data. For methodological details, please consult the Doing Business 2012 report at http://www.doingbusiness.org/. It should be noted that these findings differ from corresponding figures obtained directly from Member States. Under a self-reporting exercise it evidently took 3-7 days and a cost of 56 euro to start a business in Bulgaria in 2011. For more details please see: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/business-environment/start-up-procedures/index_en.htm. 13