PENALTIES UNDER INCOME TAX ACT - P.K. PRADEEP KUMAR INCOME TAX OFFICER

Similar documents
25 Penalties Introduction Penalties

Penalty provisions under Income Tax Act Unlearning and relearning consequent to Finance bill 2016 By K.K.Chhaparia, FCA

PENALTIES FOR NON-COMPLIANCE TO PROVISIONS OF INCOME TAX ACT

Failure to furnish returns, comply with notices, concealment of income, etc.

CHAPTER 25. Penalties

BUDGET 2016 SONALEE GODBOLE

Concealment Penalties Proceedings and issues relating to representation in Penalty Proceedings

CA SHARAD A SHAH. 21/06/2014 DTRC - Pune WIRC

Section - 271, Income-tax Act,

Latest Changes in AIR Reporting norms, Form 15CA-CB and E-initiative(s) of the Income Tax Department

The Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition Tax Act, 2015

Under-reporting and misreporting of income - Proposed penalty regime

FINANCE BILL 2017-DIRECT TAX PROPOSALS AT GLANCE


IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH B BENCH BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI RAJENDRA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)

CIT v. Reliance Petroproducts (P) Ltd. ()

Appeal, Set comm., DRP Etc Mock Test IGP-CS CA Vivek Gaba

Major direct tax proposals in Finance Bill, 2017

Key changes / amendments to take effect from June 1, 2016

VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE SCHEME [CA P N SHAH]

Mihir Naniwadekar Advocate. Penalties: S. 271(1)(c), S. 271AAA, s. 271AAB

Vinodh & Muthu Chartered Accountants. Newsletter MAY 2016

Direct Tax (Article) Penalty for Concealment/Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars of Income

CBDT GUIDELINES FOR PRIOR PERMISSION UNDER SECTION 281 TO CREATE A CHARGE ON THE ASSETS

CS- FINAL- DIRECT TAX Return of Income and Procedure of Assessment

Total turnover/ Gross receipts 30% 30% of FY > Rs 50 Cr No change in rate of Surcharge

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES, D, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.S.SYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER

Salient features of Direct Tax Proposals of Union Budget 2011

Commissioner of Income Tax 2. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant Mr. Niraj Sheth i/b Atul Jasani for the respondent. DATED : 4 th JUNE, 2018.

ALL GUJARAT FEDERATION OF TAX CONSULTANTS

RE-ASSESSMENT U/S 147 (FOR DEPT. EXAM) BY S. MOHD. MUSTAFA, IRS, JCIT, TPO, CHENNAI

Executive Summary of Finance Bill, 2014 Direct Taxes

Amnesty Scheme {Chapter VI of Finance Act,2013} Presented By CA Avinash Poddar

CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2004

Payment of Export commission to Non-Resident Agent :-

Income Tax Act DIVISION ONE 1 DIVISION TWO 2

Income Tax Authorities

REASSESSMENTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND PRACTICLE ASPECTS THERETO

INCOME-TAX AND BASED ON FINANCE ACT, FINANCE ACT, 2007 WITH NOTES 49 I.T. NOTES 69 I.T. NOTES 97 I.T. NOTES I.T. NOTES 139 I.T.

PENALTY, INTEREST & SURVEY (TDS) 12/02/2011 SANGHVI SANGHVI & SANGHVI

GLIMPSE INTO AMENDMENTS BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2015 TO INCOME TAX ACT, Amendments w.e.f

DIRECT TAX DISPUTE RESOLUTION SCHEME, 2016 RUPESH PARIKSHIT & ASSOCIATES CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

JAYESH SANGHRAJKA & CO. LLP CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Q 8. Where only certain items of addition are in dispute can the assessee take advantage of the Scheme for the entire demand of the year?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

MINIMUM ALTERNATE TAX REGIME

Tax Deduction and Collection at Source

downloaded fromhttp://

Penalties and prosecution under the Income Tax Act, 1961 Issues and Landmark Judicial Pronouncements

Amendment of Direct Tax Dhruv Coaching Classes Pvt. Ltd. CMA Akshay Sen Direct Tax

CHANGES IN INCOME TAX BY UNION BUDGET 2017

SUPPLEMENT FOR TAX LAWS AND PRACTICE

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA BENCH, AGRA. ITA No.450/Ag/2015 Assessment Year:

The Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015

T. P. Ostwal & Associates (Regd.) Key Budget Proposal Budget 2012 CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

SyNoPSIS of the FINaNce BILL, 2017

more than the capital gains and the new residential asset was purchased within 2 years from the date of sale of residential property. 3. The Learned C

thousand rupees of the total income but without being liable to tax], only for the purpose of charging income-tax in respect of the total income; and

TAX AUDIT POINTS TO BE CONSIDERED

UNION BUDGET

2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE-11(1) RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BANGALORE APPELLANTS (BY SRI K V ARAVIND, ADV.

O/TAXAP/561/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD. TAX APPEAL NO. 561 of 2013

Union Budget CA. Ashok Batra. (The author is a member of the Institute. He can be reached at )

1 RETURN OF INCOME & ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE

F.NO. 380/1/2019-IT(B) Government of India/ Ministry of Finance/ Department of Revenue/ Central Board Direct Taxes / ( ) *********

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Tax Appeal No. 7 of 2005

DIRECT TAX DISPUTE RESOLUTION SCHEME, Nanubhai Desai & Co.

MAJOR Income Tax Proposals in UNION BUDGET 2017

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH D, NEW DELHI Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM And Smt. Beena A. Pillai, JM

Section 44AD of The Income Tax Act,1961

TDS under section 195 of the Income-tax Act. CA Vishal Palwe 16 December 2017 Seminar on International Taxation at WIRC

DIRECT TAX REVIEW VERENDRA KALRA & CO OCTOBER Inside this edition. Like always, Like never before

Key Amendments to Form 3CD [Effective from August 20, 2018] Nihar Jambusaria

PROCEDURE FOR ASSESSMENT. -- By CA Mahendra Sanghvi

FINANCE (NO.2) ACT, 2014 EXPLANATORY NOTES TO THE PROVISIONS OF SAID ACT AMENDMENTS AT A GLANCE

Vs. Assessee by Sh. Sanjay Nath, CA Revenue by Sh. Atiq Ahmad, Sr. DR. Date of Hearing Date of Pronouncement

EXPLANATORY NOTES TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE FINANCE(No.2) ACT, 2014

INCOME TAX PROPOSALS in UNION BUDGET 2017

(Applicability & impact Analysis) By:-

Income Tax Budget Analysis

TRACES Site and Issues in Deemed, Recovery & online resolution

TDS & TCS Recent Updates & Amendments.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs OF 2010 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2009)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: G NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G. D. AGRAWAL, PRESIDENT AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER

Insight of Few Sections

Practical difficulties for TDS returns & Previous year defaults.

INTERNATIONAL TAXATION Case Law Update

Bharat Raichandani Advocate

REPLYING TO IT NOTICES & CASH RESTRICTIONS

DIRECT TAX REVIEW AUGUST 2016 VERENDRA KALRA & CO. Inside this edition. Like always, Like never before

Basics of Income Tax

Post Assessment Work & Appeals before CIT (Appeals) under Income Tax Act Organized by: Agra Branch of CIRC 26 th December,2018. C.

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction (Original Side) I.T.A. No.264 of 2003

Finance Bill, 2015 Direct Tax Highlights

Union Budget 2014 Analysis of Major Direct tax proposals

Q & A_MTP_ Final _Syllabus 2016_ June 2017_Set 1 Paper 16 Direct Tax Laws And International Taxation

CS Professional Programme Solution June Paper - 6 Module-III Advanced Tax Laws and Practice Part-A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION No OF 2004

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 Judgment delivered on: ITA No.415/ Appellant.

Transcription:

PENALTIES UNDER INCOME TAX ACT - P.K. PRADEEP KUMAR INCOME TAX OFFICER

Penalties & prosecutions, interests & fines For the satisfactory implementation of law To increase the Number of tax payers To ensure voluntary compliance To tackle evasion of tax - HOW MANY? 2

Total No. of s/penalties - 42 Search related - 3 International Transactions related- 3 Failure in making Tax payments - 4 Non filing of returns, statements - 16 Not responding to Notices - 4 Concealment - 2 Failure to maintain books,register- 3 PAN, TAN related - 2 Others - 5 3

Concealment Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) (only upto A.Y.2016-17) [270A w.e.f. A.Y.2017-18] u/s Nature of Concealing or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income 271(1)(d) FBT Concealing or furnishing inaccurate particulars of fringe benefits Amount Min: 100% of tax sought to be evaded Max: 300% Min: 100% of tax sought to be evaded Max: 300% 4

New Formula for 271(1)(c) For A.Y.2016-17 The amount of tax sought to be evaded shall be determined in accordance with the following formula (A B) + (C D) where A = amount of tax on the total income assessed as per the provisions other than the provisions contained in section 115JB or section 115JC (hereinafter called general provisions); B = amount of tax that would have been chargeable had the total income assessed as per the general provisions been reduced by the amount of income in respect of which particulars have been concealed or inaccurate particulars have been furnished; C = amount of tax on the total income assessed as per the provisions contained in section 115JB or section 115JC; D = amount of tax that would have been chargeable had the total income assessed as per the provisions contained in section 115JB or section 115JC been reduced by the amount of income in respect of which particulars have been concealed or inaccurate particulars have been furnished: Provided that where the amount of income in respect of which particulars have been concealed or inaccurate particulars have been furnished on any issue is considered both under general provisions and under the provisions contained in section 115JB or section 115JC, such amount shall not be reduced from total income assessed while determining the amount under item D: 5

Penalty u /s 271(1)(c) Note: 'Amount of tax sought to be evaded' shall be aggregate of tax sought to be evaded under the general provisions and the tax sought to be evaded under the provisions of MAT or AMT. However, if an amount of concealed income is considered both under the general provisions and provisions of MAT or AMT, such amount shall not be considered in computing tax sought to be evaded under provisions of MAT or AMT. Further, where provisions of MAT or AMT are not applicable, the computation of tax sought to be evaded under the provisions of MAT or AMT shall be ignored. 6

New Provisions u/s 270A Under Reporting of Income A person shall be considered to have under reported his income if: (a) the income assessed is greater than the income determined in the return processed under clause (a) of sub-section (1)of section 143; (b) the income assessed is greater than the maximum amount not chargeable to tax, where no return of income has been furnished; (c) the income reassessed is greater than the income assessed or reassessed immediately before such re-assessment; (d) the amount of deemed total income assessed or reassessed as per the provisions of section 115JB or 115JC, as the case may be, is greater than the deemed total income determined in the return processed under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 143; (e) the amount of deemed total income assessed as per the provisions of section 115JB or 115JC is greater than the maximum amount not chargeable to tax, where no return of income has been filed; (f) the income assessed or reassessed has the effect of reducing the loss or converting such loss into income. 7

New Provisions u/s 270A The under-reported income under this section shall not include the following cases: (i) where the assessee offers an explanation and the income-tax authority is satisfied that the explanation is bona fide and all the material facts have been disclosed; (ii) where such under-reported income is determined on the basis of an estimate, if the accounts are correct and complete but the method employed is such that the income cannot properly be deducted therefrom; (iii) where the assessee has, on his own, estimated a lower amount of addition or disallowance on the issue and has included such amount in the computation of his income and disclosed all the facts material to the addition or disallowance; (iv) where the assessee had maintained information and documents as prescribed under section 92D, declared the international transaction under Chapter X and disclosed all the material facts relating to the transaction; (v) where the undisclosed income is on account of a search operation and penalty is leviable under section 271AAB. 8

New Provisions u/s 270A Misreporting of income (i) misrepresentation or suppression of facts; (ii) non-recording of investments in books of account; (iii) claiming of expenditure not substantiated by evidence; (iv) recording of false entry in books of account; (v) failure to record any receipt in books of account having a bearing on total income; (vi) failure to report any international transaction or deemed international transaction under Chapter X. 9

New Provisions u/s 270A Rate of Penalty The rate of penalty shall be fifty per cent of the tax payable on underreported income. In a case where under reporting of income results from misreporting of income by the assessee, the person shall be liable for penalty at the rate of two hundred per cent of the tax payable on such misreported income. In case of company, firm or local authority, the tax payable on under reported income shall be calculated as if the under-reported income is the total income. In any other case the tax payable shall be thirty per cent of the underreported income. 10

New Provisions u/s 270A The amount of total under reported income shall be determined in accordance with the following formula- (A B) + (C D) where, A = the total income assessed as per the provisions other than the provisions contained in section 115JB or section 115JC (herein called general provisions); B = the total income that would have been chargeable had the total income assessed as per the general provisions been reduced by the amount of under reported income; C = the total income assessed as per the provisions contained in section 115JB or section 115JC; D = the total income that would have been chargeable had the total income assessed as per the provisions contained in section 115JB or section 115JC been reduced by the amount of under reported income. 11

New Provisions u/s 270AA With effect from A.Y.2017-18 An assessee may make an application to the Assessing Officer for grant of immunity from imposition of penalty under section 270A and initiation of proceedings under section 276C, provided he pays the tax and interest payable as per the order of assessment or reassessment within the period specified in such notice of demand and does not prefer an appeal against such assessment order. The assessee can make such application within one month from the end of the month in which the order of assessment or reassessment is received The Assessing Officer shall, on fulfilment of the above conditions and after the expiry of period of filing appeal as specified in sub-section (2) of section 249, grant immunity from initiation of penalty and proceeding under section 276C if the penalty proceedings under section 270A has not been initiated on account of MISREPORTING OF INCOME. Where application u/s 270AA is rejected by A.O, the time period from date of application to date of rejection will be excluded for 12 filing appeal before CIT(A).

Penalty u/s u/s Nature of Amount 271AAB (w.e.f.1.7.2012) // Assessing Officer 132 Penalty where search has been initiated a) 10% of UDI if A admits UDI & specifies the manner in which earned & pays tax & int. b) 20% of UDInot admitted in search but declares in ROI & pays tax & int. c) 30 to 90% of UDI in other cases W.e.f 1.4.2017, under clause (c), penalty leviable flat @ 60% 13

Search Related Penalty u/s -- Authority to levy u/s Nature of Amount 158BFA(2) // Assessing officer or CIT(Appeals) // [Applicable only if search conducted upto 31.5.2003] 158BC Failure to disclose full income of the block period 100% to 300% of the tax on undisclosed income determined u/s 158BC(c) 271AAA (01-06-07) (upto 30.6.12) // Assessing Officer 132 Failure to admit substantiated undisclosed source of income 10% of undisclosed income 14

International Transactions Related Penalty / Authority u/s Nature of Amount 271AA // A.O or CIT(A) 92D Failure to keep and maintain infn & docs as required u/s 92D(1) and (2) 2% of Intl. transaction value 271BA // A.O 92E Failure to furnish report from an accountant as required u/s 92E 1,00,000 Fixed 271G // A.O or TPO (w.e.f. 1.10.14) or CIT(A) 92D(3) Failure to furnish infn & docs as required u/s 92D(3) 2% of Intl. transaction value 15

Failure in making Tax payments Penalty u/s u/s 140A(3) Self asst tax 140A(1) Nature of Failure to pay tax u/s 140 A(1) Amount Max: Tax Arrears 221(1) 220 Failure in making payment of tax (DN 156) Max: Tax Arrears 271C // By JCIT 272A(2)(h) // By JCIT Ch.XVIIB, 115-O, 194B TDS, Tax on distributed profits, Lottery 226(2) Attachment of Salary Tax not deducted or paid Min: 100/d Max: Tax 16

Non filing of returns, statements Penalty u/s u/s Nature of 1. 271F 139(1) Return of Income Amount 5000 2. 271FA 285BA AIR 100/day 3.271FA 285BA(1) 285BA(5) W.E.F. 1.4.2015 furnish statement of fin.trans.within time u/s285ba(2). Failure to furnish return/stat/within the period specified u/s 285BA(5) 100/day 500/day 17

Penalty u/s // Authority u/s Nature of Amount 4.271FAA 285BA(6) or 285BA(7) Persons u/s 285BA(1)(k) furnishing statement with inaccurate information 5.271FB 115WD(1) Failure to furnish FBT return Rs.50000 Rs.100/day 6. 272A(2)(c ) // By JCIT 133(1 to 6), 206, 206C, 285B 1.Return of Names & addresses /Particulars 2. TCS 3. Movie Producer Min:100/day Max: TDS/TCS 18

Non filing of returns, statements Penalty u/s // Authority 7. 272A(2)(e) // By JCIT 8. 272A(2)(f) // Pr CIT / CIT 9. 272A(2)(g) // By JCIT 10. 272A(2)(i) // By JCIT u/s 139(4A) 139(4C) Nature of Charitable Trust Scienc.Instn, News Agency, Hospital, Edu.Instn, Trade Union Amount 100/day 197A Form 15H, 15G Min:100/day 203, 206C Failure to issue Form-16, 16A (TDS) TCS:Form-27D 192 (2C) Salary Perks/Profits in Lieu of Salary Form 12BA Max: TDS/TCS Min:100/day Max: TDS/TCS 100/day 19

Non filing of returns, statements Penalty u/s u/s Nature of Amount 11. 272(A)(2)(j) // JCIT 206C(1B) (on or before 7 th of next month) 206C(1A) TCS declaration (goods for mfr & not trdg) 100/day 12. 272(A)(2)(k) (upto 30.6.2012) // JCIT 200(3), 206C(3) Quarterly Statement TDS & TCS 100/day 13. 271H w.e.f.1.7.2012 200(3), 206C(3) Quarterly Statement TDS & TCS, furnish incorrect information Rs.10000 to Rs.100000(w.ef 1.10.2014 levy as per AO s order) 20

Non filing of returns, statements Penalty u/s u/s Nature of Amount 14. 272(A)(2)(l) (from A.Yr.2006-07) // By JCIT 206A(1) (see Rule 31AC & 31ACA) Quarterly Return Interest without TDS by banks 100/day 15. 272(A)(2)(m) (w.e.f. 1.6.2015) // By JCIT 200(2A) or 206C(3A) (Form 24G) TDS / TCS by Govt office (book adj by PAO / TO / CDDO), failure to give particulars in prescribed form. Rs.100 / day 16. 271-I // A.O (w.e.f. 1.6.2015) 195(6) (Rule 37BB Forms 15CA & CB) Failure to furnish information required u/s 195(6) Rs.one lakh. 21

Not responding to Notices Penalty u/s u/s Nature of Amount 271(1)(b) // By A.O or CIT(A) or Pr. CIT / CIT 142(1), 143(2), 142(2A) Calling for Return/particulars/ Direction to get the accounts audited 10000 for each default 272A(1)(c) 131(1) Summons 10000 for each default 272AA // By A.O or JCIT 133B Collection of Information-45D Max:1000 272A(2)(a) 94(6) Failure to furnish details of securities called for vide notice u/s 94(6) Rs. 100/d 22

Failure to maintain books,register Penalty u/s u/s Nature of Amount 271A // By A.O or CIT(A) 44AA Maintain books of account / document for 6 years from A.Y. 25000 (Rule 6F) 271B // By A.O 44AB Getting accounts audited / furnish the audit report ½% of sales /gross receipts or 1.5 lakh whichever is less(upto AY 2010-11 one lakh) 272A(2)(d) 134 Allow Inspection of a register of members or Deb. Holders of company or allow copies 100/day 23

PAN, TAN related Penalty u/s u/s Nature of 272B 139A Apply or quote PAN 272BB 203A Apply or quote TAN Amount 10000 10000 24

OTHERS Penalty u/s // Authority u/s Nature of Amount 271D // By JCIT 269SS Loan or Deposit or immovable property advance taken in cash 20000 or more Amount taken 271E // By JCIT 269T Loan or Deposit or immovable property advance repaid in cash 20000 or more Amount repaid 271(4) // By A.O or CIT(A) Firm profits distribution to partner violating deed partner showing less income 150% of (tax on assessed income minus tax on returned income) 25

Penalty u/s // Authority 272(A)(2)(b) // By JCIT 272(A)(1)(a)&(b) // By JCIT u/s OTHERS Nature of 176(3) Give Notice of discontinuance of business/profession 176(3) (within 15 days) Refusal to answer question or sign statement Amount 100/day 10000 Amendment with effect from 1.4.2017: 272(A)(1)(d) 142(1) / 143(2) / 142(2A) Failure to comply with a notice u/s 142(1) / 143(2) or failure to comply with a direction issued under 142(2A) 10000 for each default 26

Mens Rea & Reasonable cause With effect from 10.09.1986 The words reasonable cause omitted Now mens rea is inbuilt in penalty proceedings No need for the revenue to establish such mens rea. However with the introduction of sec 273B - If the assessee proves that the default is not on account of mensrea and there was reasonable cause for failure, no penalty shall be imposed (concealment & search penalties not covered) - Sections covered u/s 273B : 271(1)(b), 271A, 271AA, 271B, 271BA, 271BB, 271C, 271CA, 271D, 271E, 271F, 271FA, 271FAB, 271FB, 271G, 271GA, 271H, 271I, 272A(1)(c), 272A(1)(d), 272A(2), 272AA(1), 272B, 272BB, 272BBB, 273(1)(b), 273(2)(b) & 273(2)(c) Madras HC CIT v. T. Perumal dt 29.10.2014 held that owing to the nature of business of assessee (civil contractor), if cash loans are found to be genuine and unavoidable, then penalty u /s 271D & 271E for violation of provisions 27 of sec.269ss and 269T are not attracted.

Mens Rea The debate as to whether mens rea is required to be proved for levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is now settled by the decision of hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Dharmendra Textiles 306 ITR 277. Apex court held:..object behind enactment of section 271(1)(c ), read with the Explanations thereto, indicates that the said section has been enacted to provide for a remedy for loss of revenue. The penalty under that provision is a civil liability. Wilful concealment is not an essential ingredient for attracting civil liability, as is the case in the matter of prosecution under section 276C... 28

Mens Rea In the case of CIT v. Reliance Petroproducts Ltd, Apex court also held that : Merely because assessee had claimed expenditure, which claim was not accepted or was not acceptable to revenue, that by itself would not attract penalty under section 271(1)(c). Madras H.C in the cases of CIT vs. C. Anantharaman Chettiar 273 ITR 401 and Christopher vs. CIT 286 ITR 511, held that Disclosure of additional income by filing revised return with an assertion that disclosure is to buy peace is not bar on penalty and penalty can be imposed even in the case of so-called voluntary disclosure. 29

Law applicable Which law is applicable? Whether Law as it stood at the time of the commitment of default OR Law as it stood in the F.Y in which the assessment is completed OR Law as it stood at the time of levy of penalty 30

The substantive law applicable is as it stood as on the date of default However - procedural law with regard to time limits obtaining approval of JCIT quantum etc., law as on the date of initiation/levy. 31

Is it necessary to take prior approval of any higher authority for levy of any penalty? If so, what are the occasions? Yes -- prior approval of the JCIT. ITO can levy upto Rs.10,000/- ACIT/DCIT can levy upto Rs.20,000/- above this limit with the approval Sec. 274(2) If penalty is levied by the JCIT after passing the penalty order, he shall send a copy to the AO Sec. 274(3) 32

Time limits What are the time limits for levy of penalties? To Levy (a) Within the F.Y. in which proceedings, in the course of which penalty is initiated, are completed (or) (b) Within 6 months from the end of the month in which penalty action was initiated - whichever is later However, if appeal is pending, within 6 months from the end of the month in which the order of CIT(A) or ITAT is received by the CIT/CCIT Contd. 33

within six months from the end of the month in which order u/s 263 is passed (w.e.f. 1.4.2004 order u/s 264 is also included) Finance Bill 2003 CIT(A) Order passed on or after 01-06-2003 Proviso is inserted To enhance the time limit from 6 months Within one year from the end of the F.Y. in which the order of CIT(A) is received by the CCIT/CIT 34

Contentious Issues & Clarifications Vide Finance Act 2002, Sec.271(1)(c) amended (Expln 4) to the effect that reduction of loss would also attract penalty. The Supreme Court, in the case of Virtual Soft Systems held that there should be a positive income to levy penalty u /s 271(1)(c) prior to 1.4.2003 in view of the above amendment. However, subsequently, in the case of CIT v. Gold Coin Health Food Pvt Ltd (304 ITR 308), the Apex Court has overruled its own decision and observed that Even for the period prior to amendment, the position was that penalty was leviable even in a case where addition of concealed income reduced the returned loss and held that the said amendment is only clarificatory in nature. This view was again upheld by Supreme court in the case of Saheli Leasing & Industries Ltd 324 ITR 170.

Contentious Issues & Clarifications The Delhi High Court case of Nalwa Sons Investment Ltd 327 ITR 543, held that where the income tax payable on the total income under normal provisions is less than tax payable on book profits u/s 115JB, then penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is not attracted. Vide Fin Act 2015, expln 4 to sec.271 modified to the effect that cumulative sum of concealment under both provisions should be taken into account for penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Vide Circular No.25 / 2015 dated 31.12.2015, the CBDT accepted the above decision and clarified that the amendment to expln 4 is prospective and applicable w.e.f. 1.4.2016.

Contentious Issues & Clarifications The Supreme court, in the case of CIT v. Atul Mohan Bindal - 317 ITR 1, held that the A.O has to be satisfied that a person has concealed the particulars of his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such income. Subsection (1B) to sec.271 inserted vide Finance Act 2008 with retrospective effect from 1.4.1989 clarifies that : Where any amount is added or disallowed in computing the total income or loss of an assessee in any order of assessment or reassessment and the said order contains a direction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c), such an order shall be deemed to constitute satisfaction of the AO for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c)

Contentious Issues & Clarifications CBDT Circular No.10/2016 dated 26.04.2016 clarifies that The period of limitation of penalty proceedings u/s 271D and 271E of the Act is governed by the provisions of section 275(1)(c) of the Act. Therefore, the limitation period for the imposition of penalty under these provisions would be the expiry of the financial year in which the proceedings, in the course of which action for the imposition of penalty has been initiated, are completed, or six months from the end of the month in which action for imposition of penalty is initiated, whichever period expires later. The limitation period is not dependent on the pendency of appeal against the assessment or other order referred to in section 275(1)(a) of the Act. - Reliance placed on Delhi High Court s decision in the case of CIT v. Worldwide Township Projects Ltd ITA No.232/2014 dated 21.05.2014.

Whether any authority can waive or reduce the penalty levied? Yes, u/s 273A of the Act, the CIT was empowered waive/reduce/compound /stay in certain cases Under sec.273aa (w.e.f 1.4.2008), where an assessee made an application for settlement u/s 245C and the proceedings have abated u/s 245HA W.E.F. 1.6.2016: An order accepting or rejecting the application of an assessee u/s 273A / 273AA shall be passed by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner within a period of twelve months from the end of the month in which such application is received. In respect of applications pending as on 1st day of June, 2016, the order under said sections shall be passed on or before 31 st May, 2017. 39 to

What are these cases? What is the procedure? Power to reduce or waive penalty etc., in certain cases CIT can waive/reduce on his own motion or otherwise penalty leviable/levied u/s 271(1)( c ) 40

if he is satisfied that voluntary disclosure prior to detection of concealment was there and assessee, cooperated with enquiries either paid/made satisfactory arrangements for payment Prior approval of CCIT/DGIT is required if aggregate amount of such concealed income for different years exceeds 5 lakhs Assessee will be having this benefit only once in life time -Sec. 273A(3) 41

CIT may waive/reduce/stay/compound any other penalty on the application of the assessee after recording his reasons to waive/reduce if the CIT is satisfied - that assessee will be put into genuine hardship assessee has cooperated if exceeds One Lakh» with the previous approval of CCIT/DGIT SEC 273A(4) 42

THANK YOU