Why Regulate the unregulated?

Similar documents
/ v8. A Guide to Money Market Funds under the MMFR

ESMA s consultation papers on draft regulatory standards under the securitisation regulation Roxana Damianov, Thierry Sessin-Caracci, Adrien Amzallag

Frequently Asked Questions: European Money Market Fund Regulation

Frequently Asked Questions: European Money Market Fund Regulations

European Money Market Fund Reform: Almost Final?

Official Journal of the European Union. REGULATION (EU) 2017/1131 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 14 June 2017 on money market funds

Consultation Paper Draft technical standards on content and format of the STS notification under the Securitisation Regulation

A New Era: The New European Framework for Securitisations

Shadow Banking Out of the Shadows and Into the Light

Association For Financial Markets in Europe

CP 119 Consultation on amendments to (and consolidation of) the Central Bank UCITS Regulations

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof,

European Money Market Fund Reform. A long time in the making. February 2017 For Professional Clients Only

SCOPE AND APPLICATION

EBA Consultation Paper on the Guidelines on Interpretation of STS Criteria. Public hearing, 11 June 2018

ESMA s 2019 Regulatory Work Programme

Consultation Paper. Draft Regulatory Technical Standards

IMMFA Fact Sheet on MMF

New rules for Money Market Funds proposed Frequently Asked Questions

REGIS-TR Securities Financing Transaction Regulation SFTR

CRR IV - Article 194 CRR IV Principles governing the eligibility of credit risk mitigation techniques legal opinion

STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS. S.I. No. 420 of 2015

EBA/CP/2018/ April Consultation Paper. Draft Guidelines on the STS criteria for ABCP securitisation

Asset Management Director PwC Year-end accounting update. January 2017

European Money Market Fund Reform 7 Jul 2017

Link n Learn. EMIR SFT Regulations. Leading Business Advisors

Notice to shareholders

Comments. Register of Interest Representatives Identification number in the register:

Information page Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive Operating conditions Investment in securitisation positions

PRA RULEBOOK CRR FIRMS INSTRUMENT 2013

Guidance notes to reporting agents on SHS regulation. for statistics on holdings of securities by reporting banking groups

Content. International and legal framework Mandate Structure of the draft RTS References Annex

Insight Liquidity Funds p.l.c. Supplement dated 23 November 2018 to the Prospectus for ILF USD Liquidity Fund

Final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards

European DataWarehouse

European Money Market Fund Reform Frequently Asked Questions

31 December Guidelines to Article 122a of the Capital Requirements Directive

EACT Monthly Report on Regulatory Issues

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of

Box 1 (1)Do you consider there is a need to review the scope of assets and exposures that are deemed eligible for a UCITS fund?

Consultation on implementation of Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive AIF RULEBOOK. Consultation Paper CP 60.

EACT Monthly Report on Regulatory Issues

MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS. BPI GLOBAL INVESTMENT FUND Fonds Commun de Placement. July 2015

EBA recommendations on the Call for Advice on European Secured Notes. 26 June 2018

Technical standards under SFTR and certain amendments to EMIR

VOLUNTARY GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF STABLE NET ASSET VALUE (NAV) LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOLS

EBF response to the EBA consultation on securitisation retention (EBA/CP/2013/14)

The Irish Funds Industry Association responds to UCITS VI Consultation

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

European MMF Reform MMCG. Jaap Kes, Head Market Risks & Execution, ING Group Treasury. Paris 7 June 2018

Consultation Paper. 19 December 2017 ESMA

Questions and Answers. ESMA s guidelines on ETFs and other UCITS issues

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) /... of

Questions and Answers ESMA s guidelines on ETFs and other UCITS issues

Questions and Answers ESMA s Guidelines on ETFs and other UCITS issues

Ordinance No. 7. Chapter One General Provisions. Chapter Two Requirements and Criteria for Organisaiton and Risk Management

REGULATION ON CREDIT INSTITUTION RISK MANAGEMENT

FBF RESPONSE TO EBA/DP/2014/02 DISCUSSION PAPER RELATIVE TO SIMPLE STANDARD AND TRANSPARENT SECURITISATIONS

ESMA guidelines on ETFs and other UCITS issues

AS SEB Pank Capital Adequacy and Risk Management Report AS SEB Pank Capital Adequacy and Risk Management Report (Pillar 3) 2017

EBF response to EBA consultation on homogeneity of underlying assets

EBA technical advice on Qualifying Securitisations. Public Hearing Event - London 26 June 2015

DRAFT ANNEX XXV REPORTING ON LIQUIDITY (PART 2 OUTFLOWS)

EFAMA reply to the EU Commission's consultation on EMIR REFIT

CONSULTATION DOCUMENT

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Consultation Paper. Draft RTS and ITS under SFTR and amendments to related EMIR RTS. 30 September 2016 ESMA/2016/1409

Disclosure Report in accordance with the EU Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR)

EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

EFAMA s position paper on securitisation

EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

(Text with EEA relevance)

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on Money Market Funds. (Text with EEA relevance)

Securitisation and Covered Bonds: the work of

Money Market Funds in Ireland

Guidelines Guidelines on stress tests scenarios under Article 28 of the MMF Regulation

Final Report Technical advice, draft implementing technical standards and guidelines under the MMF Regulation

Irish Funds response to ESMA Consultation Paper on draft technical advice, implementing technical standards and guidelines under the MMF Regulation

Samba Financial Group Basel III - Pillar 3 Disclosure Report. June 2018 PUBLIC

Public disclosure of Prudential Information

AB SEB bankas Capital Adequacy and Risk Management Report (Pillar 3) 2017

Prudential sourcebook for Banks, Building Societies and Investment Firms. Chapter 11. Disclosure (Pillar 3)

Repo and Securities Lending This course can also be presented in-house for your company or via live on-line webinar

Comments. on the homogeneity of underlying exposures in securitisation (EBA/CP/2017/21)

EUROPEAN / AMERICAN MMF. Review of the new regulations

References: Articles to , to and of the AMF General Regulation

Fédération Bancaire Française Responses to CP 18

Final report. Revision of the provisions on diversification of collateral in ESMA s Guidelines on ETFs and other UCITS issues

Repo and Securities Lending: The GMRA and GMSLA Provisions

The Impact of the EU Securitization Regulation on US Entities

GUIDANCE NOTE FOR DEPOSIT TAKERS (Class 1(1) and Class 1(2))

Report on Internal Control

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision

Luxembourg, 7 August 2017

AMF position ETFs and other UCITS issues

Secretariat of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) Bank for International Settlements CH-4002 Basel Switzerland

Consultation Paper. Draft Regulatory Technical Standards

Consultation Paper CP12/18 Securitisation: The new EU framework and Significant Risk Transfer

ASF RMBS Reporting Standard - Data Requirements ASF RMBS Pre-Issuance Disclosure

Transcription:

Why Regulate the unregulated? G20 commitment signed by the UK. Replace non binding guidelines with a consistent and coherent framework. Prevent another sub-prime. Faster collection of information on level of credit and liquidity to have a more realistic view of potential systemic issues And.ultimately 1

Bringing Shadow Banking out of the shadows From Shadow Banking to Market Based Finance 2

Monitoring Shadow Banking FORTHCOMING REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 3

Three regulations one common aim MMFR SFTR SR/SPR Disclosure Manage Risk Minimise contagion A new framework for Market Based Finance 4

Goals Investors Disclosure Regulators Central Authorities Manage Risk Awareness of higher level of risk Specific and consistent guidelines Rules on content of portfolios Minimise Contagion 5

Data Challenge Reporting Requirements Capture new Information New workflows and processes for derived data Changes to workflows and processes Stress tests Diversification and Notification Populate datafields with the correct ISO code LEI ISIN 6

Disclosure, disclosure, disclosure SFTR 7

SFTR - Scope Shares and commodities lending or borrowing Repo or Reverse Repo Sell Buy Back or Buy Sell Back Margin and Collateral re-use 8

SFTR - Disclosure UCITS and AI Funds Prospectus and Annual (or semi-annual) report Reporting to SFT Repository Same principle as EMIR, different container T+1 reporting of transactions Repository will aggregate transactions and report aggregates to regulator and central authorities Ultimate asset owner (or owner of shares or units in a fund): Specifically consent to the use of its Asset Under Management (or Asset Under Custody) for SFT or for margin/collateral re-use Investors in UCITS or AI funds Based on the reporting they will know how much of their AUM (or AUC) has been re-used and what was the revenue associated with it. 9

SDTR - Complexity Consent from clients/ultimate owners Reporting Requirements Capture new Information New workflows and processes for derived data Changes to workflows and processes Stress tests Diversification and Notification Populate datafields with the correct ISO code LEI ISIN 10

Disclosure, diversification, concentration, eligible assets MMFR 11

Definition of a MMF A UCITS or AI fund that invests in short-term assets and have distinct or cumulative objectives to offer returns in line with money market rates or preserving the value of the investment 12

MMFR eligibility and types of MMF Types of MMF Eligible Assets Short Term: CNAV - Public Debt Constant Net Value Short Term: VNAV Variable Net Asset Value Short Term: LNAV - Low Volatility Net Asset Value Standard (Long Term) VNAV Asset types allowed to be in the portfolio of a MMF: Money Market Instruments (MMI) Eligible Securitisation of Asset Backed Commercial Papers (ABCP) Deposit with credit institutions Financial Derivative Instruments (FDI) Repurchase Agreements Reverse Repurchase Agreement Other MMF Eligibility is further qualified by terms and conditions that restrict their use and, in many cases intend to regulate the risk associated to MMF. 13

MMFR Concentration, diversification Concentration A MMF portfolio must not include aggregate position in MMIs, Securitisation and ABCPs issued by a single body exceeding 10% of the assets in the portfolio. Holdings in MMIs issued and/or guaranteed by public bodies are excluded. Diversification Each type of MMF has specific diversification requirements relating to its composition, concerning: Money Market Instrument, Securitisation and ABCP OTC Derivative Counterparty Exposure MMI issued or guaranteed by public bodies Deposits Repos Reverse Repos Other MMFs There are also rules concerning aggregate exposure per Counterparty, where companies belonging to the same group are considered as a single body 14

Diversification Requirements for LVNAV Short-term MMF Money Market Instruments (MMIs), Securitisation and ABCP (++) Max 5% in MMIs, securitisations & ABCPs issued by the same body Aggregate 15% /20% max (**) in securitisations & ABCPs OTC Derivative Counterparty Exposure 5% MMIs issued/guaranteed by public bodies Deposits Reverse Repos Repos Other Money Market Funds (+) Aggregate Exposure per Counterparty (++) Max 100% per public administration, institution or organisation, diversified across a min 6 issues with max 30% per issue Max 10% in deposits with the same institutions Cash provided subject to max 15% per counterparty (Must be fully collateralized) Cash received cannot exceed 10% of assets Max 5% per MMF Aggregate max 17.5% (investment in Short-Term MMFs only) Max 15% to a single body. Exposure will include MMIs, securitisations, ABCPs issued by the counterparty, deposit made with the specific counterparty and OTC FDI (**) Max 15% until date of application of Commission Delegated Act referred to in Art 11(4) of MMFR relating to the proposed Regulation on STS securitisations and 20% thereafter whereby up to 15% may be invested in securitisations and ABCPs that do not comply with the criteria for the identification of STS securitisations and ABCPs. (+) MMFs operating solely as employee savings schemes may diverge from these limits where the participants in such schemes, who are natural persons, are subject to restrictive redemption conditions that are not linked to market developments but instead relate to specific predefined life events. (++) Subject to an MMF being authorised to invest up to 100% in MMI issued or guaranteed by a single public administration, institution or organisation provided investment is diversified across a minimum of six different issues with a maximum investment of 30% per issue. 15

MMFR Disclosure Investors (weekly) Maturity breakdown of the portfolio of the MMF Credit profile of the MMF WAM and WAL of the MMF Details of the 10 largest holdings in the MMF Total value of assets of the MMF Net Yield of the MMF NCA (quarterly) Funds where the AUM does not exceed 100M will report once a year rather than once a quarter Type and characteristics of the MMF Portfolio indicators Results of stress tests and information on assets and liabilities held in the portfolio Managers of a LVNAV MMF must also report: every event in which the price of an asset valued by using the amortised cost method deviates from the price of that asset calculated in accordance with the mark-to-market / mark-to-model by more than 10 basis points; every event in which the constant net asset value per share deviates from the net asset value per share by more than 20 basis points; and every event in which: the proportion of weekly maturing assets falls bellows 30% and net daily redemptions on a single business day exceed 10%; or the proportion of weekly maturing assets falls bellows 10%, and the measures taken by the board of the MMF. 16

MMFR Risk Management Guidelines for an optimum level of daily and weekly redeemable assets to monitor stress redemption Stress testing guidelines, results to be included in the quarterly report Guidelines as to when, why and how to limit or suspend redemptions Assets valued daily; valuation and dealing requirements depend on the type of fund. PORTFOLIO RULES Public Debt CNAV LVNAV VNAV VNAV Short Term Short Term Short Term Standard MMF MMF MMF MMF WAM (Max) 60 days 60 days 60 days 6 Months WAL (Max) (*) 120 days 120 days 120 days 12 months Daily liquid assets (min.) Weekly liquid assets (min.) 397 days 397 days 397 days 2 years Provided next interest reset date is 397 days or less 30% (+) 30% (+) 15% (#) 15% (#) (*) WAL for securities must be calculated using the residual maturity until legal redemption of the instrument. Special terms for options and ABCPs (+) MMF issued or guaranteed by a public body may be included within the weekly maturing assets up to a limit of 17.5% provided: they are highly liquid and can be redeemed and settled within one working day, and they have a residual maturity of up to 190 days (#) MMIs and other MMFs may be included within the weekly maturing assets up to 7.5% if they can be redeemed and settled within five working days. 17

MMFR Implementation complexities Creating a framework that monitors portfolios to avoid breaking composition, diversification, and other rules. Complex quarterly report, it includes a lot of information that are the results of processes (valuation, stress test results, liquidity profile of the MMF, etc.) Capturing the information required to comply with disclosure, concentration, diversification and risk management rules. No grandfathering, it may be complex and/or costly to transition existing funds that have non-eligible asset types, or where the amount of daily or weekly redeemable assets does not follow the guidelines or that are in breach of the MMFR framework in any other way 18

STS, Risk Retention, Repositories, Bans, Grandfathering (?) SR/SPR 19

Securitisation Regulation SR/SPR will bring the EU/EEA broadly in line with Basel IV framework on securitisation as agreed at G20 level It will apply to securitisations issued on or after 01/01/2019 or whenever SR will become effective. Existing securitisation will be grandfathered and they will only be affected if they are refinanced or have additional notes issued after the date SR becomes effective. ESMA and EBA have technical standards under consultation Re-securitisation and securitisation of self certified mortgages are specifically banned 20

STS Simple, Transparent, Standard Simple Unencumbered assets Underlying portfolio not actively managed Homogeneous securitised assets originated in the ordinary course of business, no exposure to credit-impaired obligor, no re-securitisation. No loan in default, at least one payment made on loans. Transparent Originator, Sponsor and Securitisation Special Purpose Entity (SSPE) must provide historical data on default and loss performance to investors. Originator, Sponsor and SSPE must comply with disclosure and due-diligence imposed on investors. Originator, Sponsor and SSPEs jointly responsible for compliance and notification to ESMA. External verification of a data sample provided by an appropriate and independent party. Originator and sponsor must provide investors with a liability cash flow model, both before pricing the securitisation and on an ongoing basis. Standard Comply with risk retention requirement. Reference interest payments based on commonly used market rates. Interest rates and currency risk must be mitigated Documented terms and conditions for timely resolution of conflicts of interests and for actions in relation to delinquency or default of debtors 21

Exceptions to ban on re-securitisation 1) Securitisation issued before the date of application of SR 2) Securitisation used for the legitimate purpose of : a) facilitating the winding up of a credit institution, an investment firm, or a financial institution, ensuring such institution viability as a going concern, or b) avoid its winding up. 3) Any securitisation to be used for the legitimate purpose of preserving the interest of investors. A fully supported asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) conduit is not considered a re-securitisation, if : 1) none of the transactions within the conduit is a re-securitisation, and 2) if there is no subdivision of the conduit in parts with different level of liability, credit risk, etc. 22

Disclosure Notification Originators, sponsors and SSPEs jointly responsible for notification to ESMA Short term programmes e.g. Asset Backed Commercial Papers (ABCP) -have special requirements (two ears max remaining maturity of underlying exposures, loan secured by residential or commercial mortgages not accepted). Data fields in notification different from ABCP and non ABCP Reporting to investors Before pricing On going, monthly or quarterly (see investor report) On an on-going basis (e.g, Changes in risk characteriistics that can impair performance) Securitisation Repositories Logic follows EMIR transaction repositories 10 templates under consultation, each template is based on the type of underlying assets of the securitisation STS T&Cs T&Cs include requirements to make data available to investors (See transparency rules and standardisation rules) 23

Disclosure what s in the investor report Number of Fields Section ABCP Investor Report Non-ABCP Investor Report Programme Information 28 N/A Securitisation Information N/A 49 Tranche/Bond Level 13 25 Transaction Information 56 N/A Tests/Events/Triggers 4 4 Cash-Flow Information N/A 5 Account Level Information 5 5 Counterparty Level Information 6 6 Other Information 3 3 Protection Information (*) N/A 51 Issuer Collateral Information (*) N/A 18 Total 115 97+69(*) (*) Synthetic non-abcp Securitisations only 24

Disclosure what s in the reporting to repositories? Type of Underlying Exposure Four letter identifier Number of fields Asset Backed Commercial Papers ABCP 59 Leases LEAS 79 Credit Card Receivables CRED 41 Consumer Loans CONS 64 Auto Loan/Leases AUTO 80 Corporate Loans CORP 75+12 (*) Commercial Mortgages COMM 50+8 (**) Residential Mortgages RESI 97 (*) 12 fields in the Collateral Section (**) 8 fields in the Tenant Information Section 25

Risk Retention Originators, original lenders, or sponsors (or, absent agreement among them, the originator) must hold a material economic interest of not less than 5% in each securitisation transaction. SR introduces a positive obligation on originators, original lenders, or sponsors to retain at least a 5% interest 26

Investors in a securitisation The seller has conducted a suitability test Retail investors If the retail investor s financial instrument portfolio does not exceed 50,000, the seller ensures that securitisation positions do not constitute more than 10% of the client s financial instrument portfolio including cash deposits. This assurance is based upon information provided by the client, but it must be calculated and carried out by the seller. Institutional investors The originator, original lender, or sponsor, regardless of whether it is located within or outside of the European Union (EU), complies with SR risk retention requirements and discloses the risk retention to investors [Potential extraterritorial reach] The originator, original lender, or sponsor, regardless of whether it is located within or outside of the EU, makes certain information about the securitisation available to investors [Potential extraterritorial reach]. The institutional investor has carried out due diligence enabling it to assess the risk characteristics of the specific securitisation position and the underlying exposures, as well as all structural features of risks of the securitisation that could impact its performance materially, including the payment priority waterfalls, the triggers that may change payment priorities, credit and liquidity enhancements, market value triggers, and events of default. 27

Who can participate in a securitisation transaction? A STS-securitisation implies that the originator, sponsor and securitisation special purpose vehicles (SPVs) must be established in the EU. Asset backed commercial paper (ABCP) transactions can qualify as STS, only if the sponsor is an EU credit institution supervised under the CRR. Securitisation repositories must also be established in the EU to be able to register with the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). SPVs used in any securitisations (including non-sts transactions) cannot be established in a non EU jurisdiction that: is a tax haven, lacks effective exchange of information with tax authorities, lacks transparency with respect to legislative, judicial or administrative provisions, imposes no requirement for a substantive local presence, is listed as a Non Cooperative Country or Territory or is on the EU blacklist of uncooperative jurisdictions, or has not signed an agreement to share tax information. 28

Where are we now? TIMELINE 29

Three regulations Not yet Under consultation Effective in Q1 2019 30

Is it enough? MINI-PANEL AND Q&A 31

For copies of the presentation contact Lucy Wicks of FixTrading lucy.wicks@fixtrading.org Or info@ipmcons.com