USE OF VAR FOR MARKET RISK

Similar documents
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Value-at-Risk (VaR) a Risk Management tool

Special Considerations in Auditing Complex Financial Instruments Draft International Auditing Practice Statement 1000

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Market Risk Disclosures For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2014

Validation of Nasdaq Clearing Models

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE

Measurement of Market Risk

Timothy F Geithner: Hedge funds and their implications for the financial system

Solvency II Insights for North American Insurers. CAS Centennial Meeting Damon Paisley Bill VonSeggern November 10, 2014

Subject: NVB reaction to BCBS265 on the Fundamental Review of the trading book 2 nd consultative document

Prudential Standard APS 117 Capital Adequacy: Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book (Advanced ADIs)

CASE STUDY DEPOSIT GUARANTEE FUNDS

Market Risk Disclosures For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2013

Preparing for the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB)

NAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL

Chapter 10 Market Risk

Market Risk: FROM VALUE AT RISK TO STRESS TESTING. Agenda. Agenda (Cont.) Traditional Measures of Market Risk

Financial Risk Measurement/Management

Fundamental Review of the Trading Book

CEA response to CEIOPS request on the calculation of the group SCR

RISKMETRICS. Dr Philip Symes

Online appendices from The xva Challenge by Jon Gregory. APPENDIX 8A: LHP approximation and IRB formula

Economic Capital. Implementing an Internal Model for. Economic Capital ACTUARIAL SERVICES

Unmasking True Performance Through Corporate RAROC

ESGs: Spoilt for choice or no alternatives?

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT - THIRD QUARTER 2010

Webinar. The Gibraltar Financial Services Commission. Solvency II Implications for Non-Executive Directors (NEDs) 28 th May 2015

2 f. f t S 2. Delta measures the sensitivityof the portfolio value to changes in the price of the underlying

The Counterparty Risk Management Policy Group III Report Includes Detailed Suggestions for Financial Intermediaries

REGULATORY CAPITAL DISCLOSURES MARKET RISK PILLAR 3 REPORT

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS

Investment Due Diligence Art and Science

Risk management. Ari Kaperi Group CRO

Fundamental Review of the Trading Book

Formalizing a Debt Management Strategy

Solvency Assessment and Management: Pillar 2 - Sub Committee ORSA and Use Test Task Group Discussion Document 35 (v 3) Use Test

Regulatory Notice 08-18

Capital Management in commercial and investment banking Back to the drawing board? Rolf van den Heever. ABSA Capital

Razor Risk Market Risk Overview

REGULATORY GUIDELINE Liquidity Risk Management Principles TABLE OF CONTENTS. I. Introduction II. Purpose and Scope III. Principles...

Pillar 3 Disclosure (UK)

Pillar 3 Regulatory Disclosure (UK) As at 31 December 2012

Economic Capital: Recent Market Trends and Best Practices for Implementation

DECEMBER 2010 BASEL II - PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Madrid Branch INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS

BOARD OF GOVERNORS FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Guideline. Earthquake Exposure Sound Practices. I. Purpose and Scope. No: B-9 Date: February 2013

There are many definitions of risk and risk management.

In-force portfolios are a valuable but often neglected asset that

Valu-Trac Investment Management Limited Pillar 3 Disclosure

Supervisory Views on Bank Economic Capital Systems: What are Regulators Looking For?

Final draft RTS on the assessment methodology to authorize the use of AMA

Summary Prospectus Investor and Service Class Shares. NASDAQ-100 ProFund. CLASS TICKER CUSIP Investor OTPIX Service OTPSX

15285 AccessIntroBookEngCover 4/3/06 12:34 PM Page 1 ACCESS A NEW LEVEL OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT - FOURTH QUARTER 2009

Derivatives Risk Statement 1 st July 2016

MFM Practitioner Module: Quantitative Risk Management. John Dodson. September 6, 2017

Financial Management in IB. Foreign Exchange Exposure

REGULATORY CAPITAL DISCLOSURES MARKET RISK PILLAR 3 REPORT

Statement of Guidance for Licensees seeking approval to use an Internal Capital Model ( ICM ) to calculate the Prescribed Capital Requirement ( PCR )

Position AMF Recommendation Guide to the organisation of the risk management system within asset management companies DOC

Best Practices for Maximizing Returns in Multi-Currency Rates Trading. Copyright FinancialCAD Corporation. All rights reserved.

PROSHARES INVESTMENT GRADE INTEREST RATE HEDGED

Basel 2.5 Model Approval in Germany

of Complex Systems to ERM and Actuarial Work

Assessing dynamic hedging strategies

Guidance on Liquidity Risk Management

Cornerstone Report: Weekly Market Update

TopQuants. Integration of Credit Risk and Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book

Bruce Tuckman Director of Financial Markets Research Center for Financial Stability, Inc.

LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT: GETTING THERE

Basel Infrastructure Survey 2012 kpmg.com

What will Basel II mean for community banks? This

1. Amended standards Transfers of investment property Amendments to IAS 40, Investment property... 8

INVESTMENT SERVICES RULES FOR RETAIL COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES

From Financial Risk Management. Full book available for purchase here.

The use of an Economic Capital Model within an Enterprise Risk Management framework

Guidance consultation FSA REVIEWS OF CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT BY CCPS. Financial Services Authority. July Dear Sirs

Stronger Risk Controls, Lower Risk: Evidence from U.S. Bank Holding Companies

To understand why it is important to control risk, consider table from chapter 2 of my book Building Wealth in the Stock Market:

How to review an ORSA

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Explanatory note on the minimum capital requirements for market risk

Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund

THE ROLE OF THE BOARD IN RISK MANAGEMENT

INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS MODULE

Webinar Presentation How Volatility & Other Important Factors Affect the Greeks

Correlations in Asynchronous Markets

1 Commodity Quay East Smithfield London, E1W 1AZ

Capital Buffer under Stress Scenarios in Multi-Period Setting

Advisory Guidelines of the Financial Supervision Authority. Requirements to the internal capital adequacy assessment process

Kenya Gazette Supplement No. 42 3rd April, (Legislative Supplement No. 19)

Position AMF Recommendation Guide to the organisation of the risk management system within asset management companies DOC

Subject SP9 Enterprise Risk Management Specialist Principles Syllabus

Citadel Securities (Europe) Limited

European Banking Authority (EBA) Discussion Paper

BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION Consultative Document Simplified Alternative to the Standardized Approach to Market Risk Capital Requirements

FINAL NOTICE. Nomura House, 1 St Martin s-le-grand, London EC1A 4NP

Transcription:

1 USE OF VAR FOR MARKET RISK Dr Philip Symes Copyright 2006 Asymilate Consulting Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Introduction 2 This presentation focuses on several questions about the use of VAR: How should VAR analysis best be used? In what context is VAR an effective management tool? How should VAR be used by management?

Why VAR? 3 Why did banks choose to implement VAR? Perceived best practice, e.g. in RiskMetrics. One number for senior management focus Regulatory capital benefits. Economic capital benefits. BUT: Some traders saw opportunities for increased market risk limits Banks did not always follow a logical path to introducing VAR Methodologies were introduced without proper understanding

Why VAR? 4 How is VAR now used? Risk Control monitor VAR against limits Limits are normally at business unit rather than desk or trader Trading limits using sensitivities still preside over VAR with higher granularity P&L attribution is performed using sensitivities not VAR

Using VAR 5 Some examples of when VAR changes: market rate changes with positions unchanged positions change, market rates stay the same the historical time series used is modified All three of the above have an impact on daily profit and loss but the change in VAR is NOT the change in valuation of the transactions There are complexities: If VAR is deemed the market risk capital what returns should be used for a risk-adjusted calculation? Should we split the return into its component parts (market, credit, operational, other risks?) How do we deal with intra-day trading the P&L for which is in returns but not in VAR?

Using VAR 6 VAR can best be used as a blunt trading management tool or a robust risk control/management tool: Consolidate risk across the firm for management Provide a portfolio view of risk across multiple trading desks exposed to the same risk factors Provide traders with an alternative view of risk in their books to the more accepted sensitivities risk analysis Delta VAR, intra-day can provide the sole market risk limit allocation methodology but end of day can t Quickly Focus trading management on market risk concentrations requiring remedial action by traders

Using VAR 7 Using VAR day-to-day: Daily risk appetite set by the Heads of Investment Bank Trading at morning meetings End of day VAR numbers distributed from central engine to dealers trading systems New VAR limits set in morning meeting by unit and translated into sensitivities for trading Delta VAR method used for intra-day reporting to senior management (e.g. linear mark-to-future ) Global books passed to next time zone Repeat process

Pros & Cons of VAR 8 Pros of using VAR: Tool for performance measurement based on risk taken, not just today s gross return Defines what is low or high risk Constant reference point for staff Allows for risk-reducing benefits of diversification at a portfolio level More informed decision making on trading strategy and pricing Corporate focus on understanding, measuring and controlling risk Consistent measurement tool

Capital Management 9 Cons of using VAR: Not all trading instruments have definable risk parameters Loss estimates dependent on chosen confidence level Difficult to determine the impact of market liquidity Future M-to-M values, especially for complex derivatives, can be complex and is still evolving Volatilities and correlation's are difficult to project and varyy over time Organizational issues that can limit effectiveness Systems limitations Inadequate operational Controls

Summary 10 There are still questions about the proper use of VAR Need to understand why it is being used Sometimes VAR might not be properly understood VAR needs to be reassessed daily There are pros and cons for using VAR It should be used as one part of a holistic risk analysis VAR calculation is not a substitute for business judgement and strong internal controls.