Actuarial Valuation as required under LKAS 19

Similar documents
Discussion on Treatment of Past Service Cost Under Various Standards

Indian Accounting Standard (AS - 15)

Accounting and Actuarial Fundamentals of Standard on Employee Benefits Ind AS 19

IAS 19:- Employee Benefits By Ferdinand Othieno 6 February 2015 Nairobi

Employee Benefits, AS 15

Accounting Clinic VII. McGraw-Hill/Irwin The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2009 All rights reserved. Clinic 7-1

The New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund Application for Suspension of Benefits under MPRA EXHIBIT 21

Post Employment Benefit and Other Long term Benefit Disclosures under Ind AS 19 and AS 15 (R)

City of Orlando Police Officers' Pension Fund

City of Winter Springs Defined Benefit Plan Actuarial Valuation

A. Scope LKAS 19 deals with all employee benefits, except those to which SLFRS 2 applies (share based payments).

Institute of Actuaries of India

New Castle County Pension Plan Review March, Boomershine Consulting Group

CITY OF TALLAHASSEE PENSION PLANS ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2016

Municipal Fire & Police Retirement System of Iowa

Financial Accounting and Reporting Study Notes - Pension

Accounting for Retirement Benefits

CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2008

Pension Accounting Research Series 2018 UPDATE FOR 2017 DISCLOSURES. By Jon Waite, SEI Institutional Group. seic.com

City of Jacksonville General Employees Retirement Plan Actuarial Valuation and Review as of October 1, 2016

City of Clearwater Employees Pension Plan Actuarial Valuation Report as of January 1, 2018 Annual Employer Contribution for the Fiscal Year Ending

ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, City of Plantation General Employees Retirement System

ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, City of Plantation Police Officers Retirement System

As you are aware, a copy of the Report should be filed with the State at the following address upon approval by the Pension Board.

Employee Benefits (IAS 19) 1

FINANCIAL REPORTING WORKSHOP FOR COUNTY GOVERNMENTS AND PUBLIC-SECTOR ENTITIES. IPSAS 25: Employee Benefits

(Entity that already applies the International Financial Reporting Standards)... II-1

ACTUARIAL VALUATION OF CITY OF LAUDERHILL POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM AS OF OCTOBER 1, July, 2013

Employees' Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth Revised Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2014

KP Actuaries and Consultants XYZ Private Limited

SPRINGFIELD FIREFIGHTERS PENSION FUND

OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

Institute of Actuaries of India

Hod Carriers Local 166 Pension Fund (East Bay)

City of Gainesville Consolidated Police Officers and Firefighters Retirement Plan

Ind AS 19 Employee Benefits

City of Jacksonville General Employees Retirement Plan

Workshop 25: Company Financial Statements Accounting for Pension Plans. Lauren R. Okum, ASA, EA, MAAA, MSPA Premier Actuarial Solutions, Chicago, IL

TOWN OF LANTANA POLICE RELIEF AND PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Case Study. SPRING/FALL 2019 Design & Accounting Exam U.S. RETDAU EXAM RETDAU

Q3 Financial Performance. October 30, 2017

Actuarial Valuation Report for the Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2016

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 18. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.18. Accounting for Pensions

LIABILITIES FOR EMPLOYEE FUTURE BENEFITS

June 19, Compute the City s recommended contribution rate for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2015.

Actuarial Valuation and Review as of June 30, 2009

STATE OF IOWA PEACE OFFICERS RETIREMENT, ACCIDENT AND DISABILITY SYSTEM

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2017

CITY OF HOLLYWOOD GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2012

TOWN OF LANTANA POLICE RELIEF AND PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2016

TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF GEORGIA REPORT OF THE ACTUARY ON THE VALUATION PREPARED AS OF JUNE 30, 2016

Actuarial Valuation. City of Waukegan Waukegan Firefighters' Pension Fund

The City of Omaha Police & Fire Retirement System

City of Fort Pierce Retirement and Benefit System Fifty-Ninth Annual Actuarial Valuation Report for the Year Ending September 30, 2017 GRS

COUNTY OF VOLUSIA VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS PENSION SYSTEM

Ventura County Employees Retirement Association

RREVISED AS15: EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

Manitoba Public Insurance Impact of IAS 19R

Financial Reporting Considerations Related to High Court of Justice Ruling on Equalization of U.K. Pension Benefits

CITY OF HOMESTEAD POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2015

The Water and Power Employees' Retirement Plan of the City of Los Angeles Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2014

ACTUARIAL REPORT. on the Pension Liabilities which CENTRA GAS MANITOBA INC. has as at DECEMBER 31, with respect to the

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A

F I R E A N D P O L I C E P E N S I O N A S S O C I A T I O N

Fresno County Employees Retirement Association

As you are aware, a copy of the Report should be filed with the State at the following address upon approval by the Board.

CITY OF CLEARWATER EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF JANUARY 1, 2016

YOUNG MEN S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION RETIREMENT PLAN EIGHTIETH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ACTUARY PREPARED AS OF JUNE 30, 2001

CITY OF TAMARAC POLICE OFFICERS' PENSION TRUST FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT

Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore

RET DAU Model Solutions Spring 2017

ACTUARIAL REPORT AS OF JANUARY 1, 2012 FOR THE WESTERN CONFERENCE OF TEAMSTERS PENSION PLAN

Institute of Actuaries of India

IPERS Actuarial Assumptions and Methods 2015

Actuarial Society of India. Examinations. November SA4 Pension & Other Employee Benefits. Indicative Solutions

November Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota General Employees Retirement Plan St. Paul, Minnesota

CITY OF MOUNT DORA GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014

Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2005

Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund. Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, Copyright 2004

2. Reconciliation between Japanese GAAP and IFRS

Automotive Industries Pension Plan Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2010

Q4 Financial Performance. February 5, 2018

Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota. Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, Copyright 2004

City of. icipal Police 30, 2019

OUTLINE OF CONTENTS REPORT OF OCTOBER 1, 2013 ACTUARIAL VALUATION

Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund. Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, Copyright 2007

The Water and Power Employees' Retirement Plan of the City of Los Angeles Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2017

Financial Accounting. Employee Future Benefits Pensions & Post Retirement Benefits 11/11/ Point Learning Systems Inc.

C I T Y O F F O R T P I E R C E R E T I R E M E N T A N D B E N E F I T S Y S T E M

ORLANDO UTILITIES COMMISSION PENSION PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2016

City of Los Angeles Fire and Police Pension Plan

City of Holyoke Retirement System Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2016

Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund. Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, Copyright 2009

Consolidated financial statements 2016

March 26, The purpose of the valuation of the City of Eastpointe Employees Death Benefit Plan as of November 1, 2012 is to:

The next regular meeting of the Retirement Board will be held at 8:30 a.m. on Thursday, March 15, 2018.

MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND

ASC 715 for Pensions: What Your Clients and Their Auditors Need to Know. Raymond D. Berry, MSPA, ASA, EA, MAAA Grant Thornton LLP

Transcription:

Actuarial Valuation as required under LKAS 19

Accounting Standards are Definitive benchmarks prescribed by a country s Accounting Standard Board.

Comparison Measurement Disclosures & Recognition under expense in the Income Statement and Balance Sheet

Short-Term Employee Benefits Other Long-Term Employee Benefits Post Employment Benefits Termination Benefits

Requires a best estimate of likely Future Benefit Payment. Future Payments are to be Discounted back. Gains/ Losses: Deviations between Actual and Expected

Projected Unit Credit Method : Present Value of All Accrued Benefit on valuation Date on Projected Salaries at Exit (PBO) Required Under LKAS 19. Required Under ASC 715 (US-GAAP) Required Under IAS-19 (IFRS)

Mortality Demographic Assumptions Turnover/Attrition Retirement Age...

Setting the Assumptions is a Group Work. Salary Escalation, Attrition Rate best Known by the Employer Disount Rate is market driven Other related assumptions are taken on a best estimate from past trend.

As per Payment of Gratuity Act (1983)- Gratuity is the payment made by the employer to an employee in appreciation of continuous service rendered by the employee. Gratuity is payable immediately on the EXIT of employment of the employee after he/she has rendered a continuous service of not less than 5 years On retirement/early exit, or On death, or Exit due to disablement, accident or disease.

Required Information To determine Identification of the Employee Date of Birth Date of Joining Date of Valuation Monthly Salary Retirement Age Benefit Description Age Past service Discontinuance liability Actuarial Liability

Benefit : 15 days salary per year of service Past Service = 10 Years Age = 40 Years Current Salary = 10,000 Rate of Discounting = 7% Vesting Period = 5 Years Retirement Age = 60 Years Method of Valuation = Projected Unit Credit Method

Future Salary Growth = 5% Benefits = 15/30*10,000*10 = 50,000 Actuarial Value = 50,000*(1.05/1.07)^(60-40) = 34,283 Actuarial Value differs due to uncertainty of early withdrawal and mortality

Future Salary growth = 4% Benefits = 15/30*10,000*10 = 50,000 Actuarial Value = 50,000*(1.04/1.07)^(60-40) = 28,311 Actuarial Value differs due to uncertainty of early withdrawal and mortality

Future Salary growth = 9% Benefits = 15/30*10,000*10 = 50,000 Actuarial Value = 50,000*(1.09/1.07)^(60-40) = 72,414 Actuarial Value differs due to uncertainty of early withdrawal and mortality

General description of the type of plan Principal actuarial assumptions Accounting policy for recognizing actuarial gains & losses. Reconciliation with movements during the period of the liability in the balance sheet. Details of total expense (income statement)

100 Liability 4 Benefit Payments (leavers) 28.25 Extra year s interest and benefit accrual 150 124.25 Liability Loss Year Start Year End Year End Expected Year End Actual

SLAS 16 Hit to Income statement

I. ASSUMPTIONS: 01/04/2011 to 31/03/2012 DISCOUNT RATE [PREVIOUS] 8.25% RATE OF RETURN ON PLAN ASSETS [PREVIOUS] 0.00% SALARY ESCALATION [PREVIOUS] 8.00% ATTRITION RATE [PREVIOUS] 2.00% DISCOUNT RATE [CURRENT] 8.50% RATE OF RETURN ON PLAN ASSETS [CURRENT] 0.00% SALARY ESCALATION [CURRENT] 8.00% ATTRITION RATE [CURRENT] 2.00%

II. TABLE SHOWING CHANGE IN THE PRESENT VALUE OF DEFINED BENEFIT OBLIGATION: PRESENT VALUE OF BENEFIT OBLIGATION AS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE CURRENT PERIOD 01/04/2011 to 31/03/2012 100,00,000 INTEREST COST 8,25,000 CURRENT SERVICE COST 20,00,000 LIABILITY TRANSFERRED IN - (LIABILITY TRANSFERRED OUT) - (BENEFIT PAID) (4,00,000) ACTUARIAL (GAINS)/LOSSES ON OBLIGATIONS 25,75,000 PRESENT VALUE OF BENEFIT OBLIGATION AS AT THE END OF THE CURRENT PERIOD 150,00,000

III. TABLE OF FAIR VALUE OF PLAN ASSETS: 01/04/2011 to 31/03/2012 FAIR VALUE OF PLAN ASSETS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PERIOD EXPECTED RETURN ON PLAN ASSETS - CONTRIBUTIONS 4,00,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER COMPANY - (TRANSFER TO OTHER COMPANY) - (BENEFIT PAID) (4,00,000) ACTUARIAL GAINS/(LOSSES) ON PLAN ASSETS - FAIR VALUE OF PLAN ASSETS AT THE END OF THE PERIOD -

IV. EXPENSES RECOGNIZED IN THE STATEMENT OF OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (OCI) 01/04/2011-31/03/2012 ACTUARIAL (GAINS)/LOSSES ON OBLIGATION FOR THE PERIOD 25,75,000 ACTUARIAL (GAINS)/LOSSES ON ASSET FOR THE PERIOD - NET (INCOME)/EXPENSE FOR THE PERIOD RECOGNIZED IN THE STATEMENT OF OCI 25,75,000 (ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PERIOD) - (ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME AT THE END OF THE PERIOD) 25,75,000

V. AMOUNT RECOGNIZED IN THE BALANCE SHEET: 01/04/2011 to 31/03/2012 FAIR VALUE OF PLAN ASSETS AT THE END OF THE PERIOD - (PRESENT VALUE OF BENEFIT OBLIGATION AS AT THE END OF THE PERIOD) (150,00,000) FUNDED STATUS (150,00,000) NET (LIABILITY)/ASSET RECOGNIZED IN THE BALANCE SHEET (150,00,000)

VI. EXPENSES RECOGNIZED IN THE INCOME STATEMENT: 01/04/2011 to 31/03/2012 CURRENT SERVICE COST 20,00,000 INTEREST COST 8,25,000 (EXPECTED RETURN ON PLAN ASSETS) - EXPENSE RECOGNIZED IN INCOME STATEMENT 28,25,000

VII. BALANCE SHEET RECONCILIATION: 01/04/2011 to 31/03/2012 OPENING NET LIABILITY 100,00,000 EXPENSE RECOGNIZED IN P&L 28,25,000 EXPENSE RECOGNIZED IN THE STATEMENT OF OCI 25,75,000 NET TRANSFER IN - (NET TRANSFER OUT) - (EMPLOYER'S CONTRIBUTION) (4,00,000) NET LIABILITY/(ASSET) RECOGNIZED IN THE BALANCE SHEET 150,00,000

VIII. EXPENSES RECOGNIZED IN THE INCOME STATEMENT OF NEXT YEAR: 01/04/2012 to 31/03/2013 CURRENT SERVICE COST 25,00,000 INTEREST COST 12,75,000 (EXPECTED RETURN ON PLAN ASSETS) - EXPENSE RECOGNIZED IN INCOME STATEMENT 37,75,000

IX. CASH FLOW PROJECTION: PROJECTED BENEFITS PAYABLE IN 2013 14,41,923 2014 12,23,722 2015 14,45,048 2016 16,92,611 2017 20,26,592 2018-2022 123,12,274

X. EXPERIENCE ADJUSTMENT: 01/04/2011 to 31/03/2012 ON PLAN LIABILITY (GAINS)/LOSSES 35,42,543 ON PLAN ASSETS (LOSSES)/GAINS -

SLAS 16 LKAS 19 Current Service Cost 2,000,000 2,000,000 Interest Cost 825,000 825,000 Actuarial (Gain)/Loss 2,575,000 0

Assumption Increase Decrease Discount rate Salary Increase Rate Liab. would decrease and leads to actuarial gain Liab. would increase and leads to actuarial loss Liab. would increase and leads to actuarial loss Liab. would decrease and will lead to actuarial gain

LKAS19 Full and immediate recognition outside Income statement via Other Comprehensive Income (OCI). This results in Reduction Of Volatility in profits and losses of company.

LKAS19 Corridor approach can be used to delay recognition of losses / (gains) Corridor Approach amortizes over employees future service periods any unrecognized gains or losses in excess of 10% of greater of projected benefit obligation or fair value of plan assets

Unrecognized net gain/loss Net gain/loss subject to recognition Corridor = 10% Max(PBO, Fund Assets)