Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2007, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam

Similar documents
Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2007, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Final Exam

The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2009, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam

The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2010, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay Solutions to Final Exam

The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2011, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam.

The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2012, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam

The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2017, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2014, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Midterm

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2010, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Midterm

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2012, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Midterm

The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2011, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Final Exam

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2016, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Midterm

Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2007, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Midterm

The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2017, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Final Exam

The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2013, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Final Exam

The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2015, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Final Exam

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2013, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Midterm

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2012, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Midterm

Lecture Note 8 of Bus 41202, Spring 2017: Stochastic Diffusion Equation & Option Pricing

High-Frequency Data Analysis and Market Microstructure [Tsay (2005), chapter 5]

Financial Times Series. Lecture 6

Financial Econometrics

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2016, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Midterm

Amath 546/Econ 589 Univariate GARCH Models

ARCH and GARCH models

STAT758. Final Project. Time series analysis of daily exchange rate between the British Pound and the. US dollar (GBP/USD)

Lecture Note of Bus 41202, Spring 2008: More Volatility Models. Mr. Ruey Tsay

Financial Data Analysis, WS08/09. Roman Liesenfeld, University of Kiel 1

Financial Econometrics Jeffrey R. Russell. Midterm 2014 Suggested Solutions. TA: B. B. Deng

Assicurazioni Generali: An Option Pricing Case with NAGARCH

NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS, STATISTICS & PHYSICS SEMESTER 1 SPECIMEN 2 MAS3904. Stochastic Financial Modelling. Time allowed: 2 hours

2.4 Industrial implementation: KMV model. Expected default frequency

Lecture Note of Bus 41202, Spring 2017: More Volatility Models. Mr. Ruey Tsay

Conditional Heteroscedasticity

FE570 Financial Markets and Trading. Stevens Institute of Technology

Financial Econometrics Notes. Kevin Sheppard University of Oxford

MORNING SESSION. Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 Time: 8:30 a.m. 11:45 a.m. INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES

Reading: You should read Hull chapter 12 and perhaps the very first part of chapter 13.

Lecture 9: Markov and Regime

PhD Qualifier Examination

Financial Econometrics

12. Conditional heteroscedastic models (ARCH) MA6622, Ernesto Mordecki, CityU, HK, 2006.

Mathematics of Finance Final Preparation December 19. To be thoroughly prepared for the final exam, you should

Lecture 5a: ARCH Models

FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS AND EMPIRICAL FINANCE MODULE 2

Volatility Analysis of Nepalese Stock Market

Lecture 8: Markov and Regime

Course information FN3142 Quantitative finance

This homework assignment uses the material on pages ( A moving average ).

THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO Graduate School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2003, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay

Market Volatility and Risk Proxies

Statistical Analysis of Data from the Stock Markets. UiO-STK4510 Autumn 2015

Statistics and Finance

Indian Institute of Management Calcutta. Working Paper Series. WPS No. 797 March Implied Volatility and Predictability of GARCH Models

Financial Risk Management

Practical example of an Economic Scenario Generator

Financial Econometrics Jeffrey R. Russell Midterm 2014

Amath 546/Econ 589 Univariate GARCH Models: Advanced Topics

Business Statistics 41000: Probability 3

Financial Derivatives Section 5

Final Exam Suggested Solutions

Financial Time Series Analysis (FTSA)

Lecture 3. Sergei Fedotov Introduction to Financial Mathematics. Sergei Fedotov (University of Manchester) / 6

Diploma in Business Administration Part 2. Quantitative Methods. Examiner s Suggested Answers

Assessing Regime Switching Equity Return Models

King s College London

Estimating dynamic volatility of returns for Deutsche Bank

The Self-financing Condition: Remembering the Limit Order Book

Errata, Mahler Study Aids for Exam 3/M, Spring 2010 HCM, 1/26/13 Page 1

Financial Risk Forecasting Chapter 9 Extreme Value Theory

**BEGINNING OF EXAMINATION** A random sample of five observations from a population is:

Advanced Topics in Derivative Pricing Models. Topic 4 - Variance products and volatility derivatives

New robust inference for predictive regressions

Market Risk Prediction under Long Memory: When VaR is Higher than Expected

Econophysics V: Credit Risk

Risk Management and Time Series

Two Hours. Mathematical formula books and statistical tables are to be provided THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER. 22 January :00 16:00

Lecture 6: Non Normal Distributions

Lecture 17. The model is parametrized by the time period, δt, and three fixed constant parameters, v, σ and the riskless rate r.

Errata and updates for ASM Exam MFE/3F (Ninth Edition) sorted by page.

STOCHASTIC CALCULUS AND BLACK-SCHOLES MODEL

Forecasting Stock Index Futures Price Volatility: Linear vs. Nonlinear Models

Modelling of Long-Term Risk

Lecture Note 9 of Bus 41914, Spring Multivariate Volatility Models ChicagoBooth

Research Article The Volatility of the Index of Shanghai Stock Market Research Based on ARCH and Its Extended Forms

1 The continuous time limit

Lecture Note: Analysis of Financial Time Series Spring 2017, Ruey S. Tsay

1. 2 marks each True/False: briefly explain (no formal proofs/derivations are required for full mark).

Importance Sampling for Option Pricing. Steven R. Dunbar. Put Options. Monte Carlo Method. Importance. Sampling. Examples.

Stochastic Processes and Stochastic Calculus - 9 Complete and Incomplete Market Models

Empirical Distribution Testing of Economic Scenario Generators

Gamma. The finite-difference formula for gamma is

Internet Appendix for Asymmetry in Stock Comovements: An Entropy Approach

The Black-Scholes Model

THE DYNAMICS OF PRECIOUS METAL MARKETS VAR: A GARCH-TYPE APPROACH. Yue Liang Master of Science in Finance, Simon Fraser University, 2018.

Market Microstructure Invariants

θ(t ) = T f(0, T ) + σ2 T

Week 2 Quantitative Analysis of Financial Markets Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Intervals

Exam Quantitative Finance (35V5A1)

An Introduction to Market Microstructure Invariance

Modelling Returns: the CER and the CAPM

Transcription:

Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2007, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay Solutions to Final Exam Problem A: (30 pts) Answer briefly the following questions. 1. Suppose that the price P t of a stock follows the geometric Brownian motion dp t = µp t dt + σp t dw t, where µ and σ are constant and w t is the standard Brownian motion. What is the model for the square-root of the price G(P t ) = P 0.5 t? Answer: The partial derivatives are G(P t ) P t = 0.5P 0.5 t, G(P t ) t = 0, G(P t ) 2 P 2 t = 0.25P 1.5 t. By Ito s Lemma, we have dp 0.5 t = 0.5(µ 0.25σ 2 )P 0.5 t dt + 0.5σP 0.5 t dw t, which remains a geometric Brownian motion. 2. Consider the daily log returns, in percentages, of the stock of Boeing Company from January 1997 to December 2006 for 2516 observations. Summary statistics of the returns are in the attached output. Let µ be the mean of the log return. Test H o : µ = 0 vs H a : µ 0. What is the test statistic? Draw your conclusion. Answer: The t-ratio for the sample mean is t = 0.02628/0.04273 = 0.615, which is less than 2 so that we cannot reject the null hypothesis. In other words, there is no sufficient evidence to reject the hypothesis that the mean of the return is zero. 3. Again, consider the log returns of Boeing stock and the output. Let ρ i be the lag-i autocorrrelation of the return. Test H o : ρ 1 = ρ 2 = = ρ 10 = 0 vs H a : ρ i 0 for some 1 i 10. What is the test statistic? Draw your conclusion. Answer: Q(10) = 17.33 with p-value 0.067, which is greater than 0.05 so that we cannot reject the null hypothesis of zero serial correlations. 4. Again, consider the log returns of Boeing stock and the output. Is there any ARCH effect in the return? Why? Answer: The Q(10) statistic for the squared residuals is 145.02 with p-value close to zero. Thus, there is significant ARCH effect in the data. 1

5. Consider a non-dividend paying stock. Suppose that the current price is P t = $30 and the risk-free interest rate is 6% per annum. If the price of a European call option of the stock is $3.10 when the strike price is $31 and the time to expiration is 3 months. What is the price of a European put option of the stock with the same duration and strike price? Answer: From the put-call parity, p t = c t +K exp[ r(t t)] P t = $(3.10+31e 0.06 0.25 30) = $3.64. 6. Describe two methods to identify the order of an AR model. Answer: (a) PACF and (b) Information criteria. 7. Give two weaknesses of GARCH models in modeling asset volatility. Answer: Any two of (a) symmetric response between past positive and negative returns (i.e., no leverage effect), (b) restrictive, (c) provides no explanation for volatility, and (d) slow response to an isolated jump (or drop) in stock price. 8. Suppose that the true price of a stock follows the random walk model P t = P t 1 + a t, a t N(0, 2). Suppose also that the true price is the average of the bid and ask prices and the bid-ask spread is 0.25. What is the impact of the bid-ask bounce on the serial correlation of the simple return of the stock? Answer: ρ 1 = 0.252 /4 2+0.25 2 /2 = 0.0156/2.0313 = 0.008. 9. Consider the daily log returns, in percentages, of the FedEx stock from January 1997 to December 2006 for 2516 observations. A GARCH(1,1) model is fitted to the data. The result indicates that the following IGARCH(1,1) model seems reasonable for the log returns: r t = a t, a t = σ t ɛ t, ɛ t N(0, 1), σ 2 t = 0.98σ 2 t 1 + 0.02a 2 t 1. In addition, we have a 2516 = 0.544 and σ 2 2516 = 1.95. What is the VaR for the next trading day for a position that long the stock valued at $1 million dollars? Answer: σ 2 2517 = 0.98 1.95+0.02 0.544 2 = 1.917. The 1% quantile is 2.326 1.917 = 3.2204. Consequently, VaR = $1000000 3.2204/100 = $32204. 10. The computer output also shows that the correlation cefficient between the daily log returns of FedEx and Boeing stocks is 0.23. If you hold both stocks each valued at $1 million dollars and you know that the VaR for the Boeing stock is $28,000 for the next trading day. What is the VaR of your combined portfolio for the next trading day? Answer: VaR = 32204 2 + 2 0.23 32204 28000 + 28000 2 = $47285. 11. Describe two major difficulties in modeling the volatility series of multiple asset returns. Answer: The dimension increases quickly and the volatility matrix must be positive definitely almost surely. 2

12. Suppose that the daily log returns, in percentages, of a stock follows the model r t = 0.2 + a t, a t = σ t ɛ t, ɛ t N(0, 1), σ 2 t = 0.94σ 2 t 1 + 0.06a 2 t 1. Suppose that at the forecast origin T, r T = 0.54 and σ 2 T = 2.05. What is the 2-step ahead forecast r T (2) of the return? What is the 2-step ahead volatility forecast σ T (2)? Answer: r T (2) = 0.2, σ T (1) 2 = 0.94 2.05 + 0.06 0.34 2 = 1.934. Since σ T (2) 2 = σ T (1), we have σ T (2) = 1.391. 13. Consider the growth rate of U.S. quarterly GDP from 1948 to 2004. An AR(3) model is fitted to the data. Write down the fitted model. Does the model imply the existence of business cycles? If yes, calculate the average length of business cycles. Answer: The fitted model is x t = 0.31x t 1 + 0.12x t 2 0.11x t 3 + a t, where x t = r t 0.085. Yes, the model implies the existence of business cycles. The average period is 2π/ cos 1 (1.6098/2.0333) = 9.56. 14. Give two objectives of analysis of high-frequency financial data that cannot be achieved by using daily data. Answer: Any two of (a) price discovery, (b) trading cost, (c) efficiency of market design, (d) effect of change in tick size, and (e) impact of price limit. 15. The square root of time rule of RiskMetrics is based on some critical assumptions. List two of these assumptions used. Answer: Any two of (a) Gaussian distribution, (b) zero expectation of return, and (c) the specifical IGARCH(1,1) model without a constant. Problem B. (25 points) Consider the daily log returns, in percentages, of the Boeing stock and the output. Suppose that you hold a long position of the stock valued at $1 million dollars. Answer the following questions. 1. Apply the traditional extreme value theory to the negative log returns with block size 63. What are the estimates of the three parameters k, α, and β? Are these estimates statistically significant? Why? Answer: The estimates and their standard errors (in parentheses) are k = xi = 0.6199(0.211), α = sigma = 1.42(0.28), β = mu = 3.64(0.27). The estimates are all significantly different from zero because their t-ratios are 2.94, 5.07, and 13.48, respectively, which are all greater than 1.96. 2. Based on the estimates of block size 63, what is the VaR of your position for the next trading day? 3

Answer: The 1% quantile of the log returns is V ar = 3.64 1.42 0.62 [1 ( 63 ln(0.99)) 0.62 ] = 4.39. Consequently, VaR for the position is $1000000 4.39/100 = $43900. 3. Turn to the approach of peaks over the threshold. Using threshold 2.0, we estimate the prameters of generalized Pareto distribution for the stock returns. Does the log returns have a heavy left tail? Why? Answer: Yes, the log returns have a heavy left tail because the t-ratio of the estimated shape parameter is t = 0.215 = 3.41, which is less than 2.326. Thus, we reject the 0.063 null hypothesis of normal left tail at the 5% level. 4. Based on estimated generalized Pareto distribution, what is the VaR of your financial position for the next trading day? What is the VaR of your financial position for the next 10 trading days? Answer: VaR for the position is $1000000 5.793/100 = $57930. trading day, VaR[10] = $57930 (10) 0.215 = $95039. For the next ten 5. (2 pts) Again, based on the fitted Pareto distribution with threshold 2.0, what is the expected shortfall when the 1% VaR is used? Answer; The expected shortfall is $1000000 8.2665/100 = $82665. 6. (3 pts) If empirical quantiles are used, what is the VaR of your financial position for the next trading day? Answer: p 1 = 25 2516, p 2 = 26 2516. Therefore, VaR = p 2 0.01 r (25) + 0.01 p 1 r (26) = 5.601. p 2 p 1 p 2 p 1 Therefore, VaR = $1000000 5.601/100 = $56010. Problem C. (25 pts) Again, consider the daily log returns, in percentages, of Boeing stock from January 1997 to December 2006. Suppose also that your position remains unchanged. 1. A GARCH(1,1) model with Gaussian distribution is fitted to the data. Based on the fitted model, what is the VaR of your financial position for the next trading day? Answer: From the output, the forecasts for the log return is 0.089 and that for variance is 1.454. Therefore, the 1% quantile is 0.089 2.326 1.454 = 2.716. Thus, VaR = $1000000 2.716/100 = $27160. 2. A GARCH(1,1) model with Student-t innovations is also fitted to the data. Write down the fitted model. 4

Answer: The fitted model is r t = 0.06 + a t, a t = σ t ɛ t, ɛ t t 6.02. σ 2 t = 0.054 + 0.045a 2 t 1 + 0.942σ 2 t 1. 3. Based on the fitted GARCH(1,1) model with Student-t innovations, what is the VaR of your position for the next trading day? [The 99% quantile of t 6 is 3.14.] Answer: Using the output, the 1% quantile is V ar = 0.06 3.14/ 6/4 1.674 = 3.233. Therefore, VaR for the position is VaR = $1000000 3.233/100 = $32330. 4. A GJR model is also fitted to the daily log returns of Boeing stock. Write down the fitted model. Is the model adequate? Why? Answer: The fitted GJR model is r t = 0.051 + a t, a t = σ t ɛ t, ɛ t t 6.14. σ t = 0.061 + (0.028 + 0.037N t 1 )a 2 t 1 + 0.939σ 2 t 1, where N t 1 = 1 if a t 1 < 0, = 0, otherwise. The model is adequate because the Ljung-Box statistics of the standardized residuals and the squared standardized residuals fail to indicate model inadequacy as the p-values of these test statistics are all greater than 0.05. 5. Based on the fitted GJR model and ignoring the constant term of the volaitlity equation, compute the leverage impact σ2 t (ɛ= 3), where ɛ is the standardized innovation. σt 2 (ɛ=3) Answer: σ2 t (ɛ= 3) σ 2 t (ɛ=3) = [(0.027+0.037)9+0.939]σ2 t 1 (0.027 9+0.939)σ 2 t 1 = 1.28. Problem D. (20 points) To study the direction of price movement of FedEx stock, we define the dependent variable y t as { 1 if rt > 0 y t = 0 otherwise, where r t is the daily simple return of the stock. The independent variables are r t 2 and r t 3. [We started with five lags, but only kept those that are statistical significant.] Two methods are discussed in class to model the direction of price movement. The first method is the neural network and the second method is linear logistic regression. For the neural network, we use a simple 2-2-1 network with input variables r t 2 and r t 3. Computer output is attached. Answer the following questions. 5

1. Write down the model for the two nodes in the hidden layer. Answer: The fitted equations are 2. Write down the model for the output node. Answer: The fitted function is h 1t = exp(1.34 1.13r t 2 0.75r t 3 ) 1 + exp(1.34 1.13r t 2 0.75r t 3 ), h 2t = exp(3.10 + 0.12r t 2 + 0.07r t 3 ) 1 + exp(3.10 + 0.12r t 2 + 0.07r t 3 ). h(z t ) = { 1 if zt > 0 0 if z t 0 where z t = 0.71 + 1.06h 1t 0.17h 2t 5.61r t 2 3.94r t 3. 3. Write down the model for the linear logistic regression. Answer: logit(p i ) = 0.031 5.80r t 2 4.11r t 3 or p i = exp( 0.031 5.80r t 2 4.11r t 3 ) 1 + exp( 0.031 5.80r t 2 4.11r t 3 ). 4. Suppose x n 2 = 0.018 and x n 1 = 0.015. Based on the fitted logistic regression, what is P (y n+1 = 1)? Answer: P (y n+1 = 1) = p i = exp( 0.031 5.80(0.015) 4.11( 0.018)) 1+exp( 0.031 5.80(0.015) 4.11( 0.018)) = 0.957 1+0.957 = 0.489. 5. Consider the fitted values of the neural network and the logistic regresison. Let dif be the difference between the fitted values of the two methods. The summary statistics of dif are given. Is there any major difference betwen the two methods? Why? Answer: There is no major difference between the two methods. The maximum difference of the fitted probabilities is 0.0012 and the average difference is 0.00004. 6