The Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on the Woodford County Economy

Similar documents
The Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on the Owsley County Economy

The Value of the Local Healthcare System on the Harrison County Economy

The Value of the Local Healthcare System on the Lyon County Economy

The Value of the Local Healthcare System on the Jefferson County Economy

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Woodford County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Green County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Morgan County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Daviess County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Lawrence County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Jefferson County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Lyon County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Boone County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Hancock County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Caldwell County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Hardin County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Estill County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Economic and Fiscal Impacts of St. Elizabeth Healthcare System (Hospitals and Physician Offices)

ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACT OF A WAL-MART DISTRIBUTION CENTER IN OPELOUSAS, LOUISIANA AUGUST 2008

Measuring the economic pulse of Health Care and Related Industries on the Wichita Regional Economy

The Importance of the Health Care Sector to the Kansas Economy

2016 Economic Impact of Tourism in Morgan County. Methodology, Metrics and Evaluation

2016 Economic Impact of Tourism in Tippecanoe County. Methodology, Metrics and Evaluation

The Economic Base of Sandoval County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

The Economic Base of Sandoval County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

Economic Impacts of the First 5 Placer Children & Families Commission s Funded Programs

2015 A Record Year for Indiana Tourism. Methodology, Metrics and Evaluation

The Economic Base of Valencia County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

Economic Impacts of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in Florida

Economic Impact of the New Ulm Medical Center and Related Health Sectors of Brown County

2016 Marquette County

The Economic Base of Curry County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

Basics of Economic Data

The Economic Base of Curry County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

Nashville Health Sector Research Industry Impact and Contribution National Facilities International Presence

CHAPTER 6. The Economic Contribution of Hospitals

North Dakota Printing Industry Economic & Fiscal Contribution

2015 Marquette County

Nonemployer Statistics An Indicator of Virginia s Gig Economy

Economic and Employment Effects of Expanding KanCare in Kansas

The Economic Base of Eddy County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

Economic Impact Analysis of Fort Steele National Heritage Town. Final Report. By:

County Health Economics Profile Oktibbeha County, Mississippi extension.msstate.edu/economic-profiles

Economic Impact of Tennessee HOUSE Grants

Minnesota Printing Industry Economic & Fiscal Contribution

Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation

The Economic Base of San Miguel County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University

Another Record Setting Year for Indiana Tourism. The 2017 Contribution of Travel & Tourism to the Indiana Economy

White Pine County Economic Overview

The Economic Base of Doña Ana County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

The Economic Base of Doña Ana County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

Economy Overview Champaign-Urbana, IL

The Economic Base of Rio Arriba County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University

Ohio Ethanol Producers Association

The Economic Base of Rio Arriba County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University

COLORADO FILM INCENTIVES

ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF MEDICAID EXPANSION

Tourism s Economics Impact on Somerset County. May 2018

Michigan Economic Development Corporation

The Economic. Impact of Veteran-Owned. Franchise. August 30, 2011

The Economic Base of Bernalillo County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University

Economic Contributions of Oregon s Community Hospitals Main Report

The Economic Base of Rio Arriba County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University

County Health Economics Profile Marshall County, Mississippi extension.msstate.edu/economic-profiles

Economy Overview Champaign County, IL

The Economic Base of Bernalillo County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University

Community Colleges of Spokane

Tourism s Economics Impact on the Meadowlands Liberty Region. May 2018

Economic Contribution of the Hennepin County Medical Center System

The Local Economic Impact of Short Term Rentals in Galveston, Texas

The Election Economy. November 29, City of Georgetown

Economic Overview City of Tyler, TX. January 8, 2018

The Economic Base of Quay County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

The Economic Base of San Juan County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

The Economic Impact of Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Gaming Operations

Economic Overview York County, South Carolina. February 14, 2018

Economic Impact of Long Term Care Facilities

Economic Benefits of the Proposed Casa Diablo Geothermal Power Plant, Wahlstrom & Associates 2012

Measuring Iowa s Economy: Income. By Michael A. Lipsman

Economic Overview New York

Economic Overview Monterey County, California. July 22, 2016

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE...3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS...5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE...5 WAGE TRENDS...6 COST OF LIVING INDEX...6 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT...7

Economic Overview Long Island

Economic Overview Long Island

CHAPTER 2. THE UNINSURED ACCESS GAP AND THE COST OF UNIVERSAL COVERAGE

The Local Economic Impact of Short Term Rentals in Monterey County

Economic Overview Loudoun County, Virginia. October 23, 2017

October 28, Economic Overview Yellowstone County, Montana

Economic Overview Western New York

The Economic Base of the Albuquerque, NM, Metropolitan Statistical Area

Industry Overview. Austin Community College. Emsi Q Data Set. June Emsi Q Data Set

2016 HERNANDO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Economic Overview Fairfax / Falls Church. October 23, 2017

Economy Overview. Colorado Workforce Centers. 6 Colorado ZIPs. Emsi Q Data Set. April th Street Denver, Colorado

Tell us what you think. Provide feedback to help make American Community Survey data more useful for you.

June 9, Economic Overview Billings, MT MSA

BOONE COUNTY ECONOMIC PROFILE

The Economic Base of the Albuquerque, NM, Metropolitan Statistical Area

SKECHERS HERMOSA BEACH DESIGN CENTER & EXECUTIVE OFFICES

Economic Overview Capital District

Transcription:

The Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on the Woodford County Economy Executive Summary The healthcare industry is often one of the largest employers in a rural community and serves as a significant driver of economic development. The healthcare sector plays four major roles in rural economic development. First, because the local healthcare system serves local residents, healthcare expenditures stay local, and as a results, the dollars stay within the local economy. Second, healthcare systems attract external dollars into a community from outside a local area, largely through payments from private insurance companies, Medicare and Medicaid. Third, the existence of a quality local healthcare system is important to retaining existing local businesses, as well as attracting new industries into a community. Finally, a local healthcare system will support and promote a healthy and productive workforce within a community. In many instances the economic importance of the healthcare sector is described as its economic impact on the local economy through the number of jobs, revenue and income created from the industry. Table 1 summarizes the impact of the healthcare sector on Woodford County s local economy. The local impact includes the direct, indirect and induced impacts, incorporating the multiplier effect. Overall, the healthcare sector generates approximately $72 million dollars in sales, $33 million dollars in labor income and 793 jobs within Woodford County. Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact Output (Sales) $51,131,975 1.40 $71,672,980 Labor Income $26,888,328 1.23 $33,128,203 Employment (Jobs) 590 1.34 793 Source: IMPLAN 2014

I. Introduction Over the last two decades, healthcare services have become a critical engine of growth in rural Kentucky. The healthcare sector is the second largest industry in rural Kentucky, trailing only local government. Very few rural communities have realized the full potential of local healthcare as an economic and community development tool. Rural communities have an extraordinary opportunity to improve their local economy by treating healthcare as an economic development strategy. Each healthcare service locally benefits the rural community in two ways. First, it improves people s health and, second, it contributes to the health of the local economy. This report documents the economic impact of Woodford County s healthcare system. The impact is measured by the number of jobs and income directly and indirectly associated with the local healthcare system. The report begins by describing the role of healthcare in local economic development. The next section examines the current status of the local economy and relative importance of the healthcare industry. The third section demonstrates the direct and indirect economic impact or the healthcare system on the local economy. Finally, we provide a summary of the economic impact on Woodford County from the local healthcare system. II. The role of local healthcare in economic development The role of healthcare in economic development is determined by the financial and non-financial linkages with the rest of the local economy. Financial linkages are based on the link between healthcare provider s expenditures and revenues and other local expenditures and revenues. The healthcare sector and other industries often mutually support one another through purchases and sales. These financial linkages create a larger local economy. The most important financial role for the local healthcare system is to keep local healthcare dollars at home. There are many sources of local healthcare dollars including private insurance, consumer out of pocket payments, Medicare and Medicaid transfer payments. If these expenditures leave the economy, they represent a potential loss of income and jobs for the local residents. An outmigration of healthcare services is payment for services that are received outside of the local area. This bypass of local healthcare remains an important issue for many rural healthcare providers and rural communities. If healthcare providers can attract patients or payments from outside of their community, the healthcare industry can act as an export industry. The identification of a community s supply-demand gap will assist a community in keeping healthcare dollars at home. A supply-demand gap occurs when a local economy does not supply (provide) the goods or services demanded (needed or wanted) by an individual or a community. Consequently, residents are then forced to out-shop and make purchases outside their own community.

Non-financial linkages are based on the healthcare sector s role in retaining local physicians, promoting a more productive workforce, attracting new businesses and retaining existing ones. Although these may be measured through financial outcomes, generally the link is more indirect. Nevertheless, a strong healthcare system can promote economic development in a variety of nonfinancial ways. In today s economy, a productive workforce is critical to businesses, and is vital in the recruitment of new firms and the retention of existing firms. The health status of local workers can be an important ingredient in productivity. Long-term economic benefits can be realized when the local workforce has access to and uses preventive care, leading to unproved worker productivity. III. The Woodford County local economy An examination of the sources of personal income in the community can lead to a better understanding of the potential sources of revenue for local healthcare providers. In 2014, the average per capita income for Woodford County was $43,312. This was -$6,253 more than the Kentucky average and $3,102 below the national average. Table 2 indicates that 62.5% of the total personal income for Woodford County was generated through earnings (place of residence), while 16.5% of the total personal income was from transfer payments, such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. The reminder of total personal income is represented by dividends, interest and rents. Table 2 Income and Earnings Overview ($1,000) Source of Income, Earnings, Transfer Payments County Total ($) County Percent (%) State Percent (%) National Percent (%) Total Personal Income $1,136,193 -- -- -- Earnings by Place of Residence $709,989 62.5% 60.3% 62.5% Transfer Payments $187,367 16.5% 24.2% 17.2% Total Earnings by Place of Work: $540,347 -- -- -- Wages & Salaries $394,027 72.9% 70.9% 66.5% Proprietor s Income $41,928 7.8% 10.4% 11.9% Other Labor Income $104,392 19.3% 18.7% 21.6% Transfer Payments: $187,367 -- -- -- Retirement & Disability $83,846 44.7% 34.2% 32.9% Medical Payments $66,916 35.7% 44.9% 46.1% Other Transfer Payments $36,605 19.5% 20.9% 21.0% Source: Bureau of Economic Analyses (BEA), 2014

Table 3 details Woodford County s transfer payments by type, for 2009 and 2014. By comparing Table 3 to Table 4 on next page, it is evident that the change in private industry is less than the change in federal and state transfer payments to individuals. Private industry changed by -0.7% while total transfer payment to the county changed by 25.6% from 2009 to 2014. The change in transfer payment is primarily driven by Social Security, Medicare and Medicate payments. Table 3 Transfer Payments ($1,000) Transfer Payment 2009 2014 Percent Change Medical Payments $47,610 $65,428 37.4% Retirement Benefits $63,252 $83,420 31.9% Income (welfare) benefits $12,173 $13,655 12.2% Unemployment Insurance $8,692 $1,899-78.2% Total Transfer Payments $149,203 $187,367 25.6% Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), 2014 Graph 1 highlights the public insurance coverage for Medicare, Medicaid and VA, as well as percent uninsured, for 2013 and 2014. As the graph illustrates, the percent of people uninsured increased from one year to the other. Overall the percent of people covered through Medicare, Medicaid and VA changed by 0.6% from 2013 to 2014. Graph 1 Percent Population with Public Insurance or Uninsured Source: U.S. Census, 2014

The Woodford County economy is comprised of a diverse group of industries, including manufacturing, construction, retail trade, educational services and healthcare and social assistance. Table 4 and Graph 2 provide an overview of earnings and employment, respectively, for those industries that are present in Woodford County. The healthcare and social assistance sector is one of the top industries in both, earnings and employment. Table 4 Earnings by Industry ($1,000) Industry 2009 Income 2014 Income Percent Change (2009-2014) Total earnings $387,382 $388,670 0.3% Forestry, fishing & related activities $57,736 $53,902-6.6% Mining, quarrying & oil & gas extraction $1,217 $1-99.9% Utilities $4,590 $3,943-14.1% Construction $19,675 $16,041-18.5% Manufacturing $104,579 $103,295-1.2% Wholesale trade $15,981 $14,518-9.2% Retail trade $22,344 $23,301 4.3% Transportation & warehousing $7,898 $10,983 39.1% Information $2,998 $4,384 46.2% Finance & insurance $8,859 $9,695 9.4% Real estate & rental & leasing $3,233 $3,365 4.1% Professional, scientific & technical services $28,348 $29,392 3.7% Management of companies & enterprises $6,254 $176-97.2% Administrative services $6,203 $5,780-6.8% Educational services $30,907 $31,730 2.7% Health care & social assistance $22,157 $24,927 12.5% Arts, entertainment & recreation $12,834 $5,217-59.4% Accommodation & food services $7,811 $10,796 38.2% Other services (except public admin.) $6,543 $8,400 28.4% Government & government enterprises $23,492 $27,277 16.1% Source: JobsEQ, 2014

Graph 2 Employment by Industry *Including social assistance Source: JobsEQ, 2014 IV. Economic Impact Analyses Healthcare employees and professional are often a major source of economic impact in the local economy, particularly if a local hospital is present. The impacts of the local healthcare system expenditures as well as the healthcare employee expenditures are called multiplier effects. In essence, the multiplier represents the recycling of local dollars and income in the community. This in return, creates new job opportunities and higher wages for individuals. The leakage of dollars and income out of the community, via taxes or non-local spending, reduces the size of the multiplier and the potential size of the economy. Table 5 provides the multipliers for output, employment and labor income for the healthcare sector in Woodford County. The Output (sales) multipliers represent the total change in local sales revenue due to a $1 change in healthcare sales. The employment multiplier gives the total jobs generated from one new job in the healthcare sector and, the labor income multiplier represents the total impact on labor income from a $1 increase in labor income in the healthcare sector. For example, an output multiplier of 1.4 suggests that for every $1 spent in direct sales by the healthcare sector, the indirect and induced effect to the local economy is an additional $0.40.

Table 5 suggests that the healthcare sector alone is directly responsible for generating approximately $51 million in output, nearly $27 million in income, and employs 590 people (2014). The direct impact of the healthcare sector comes from ambulatory and healthcare services (including offices of physicians, dentists and other healthcare practitioners, outpatient care centers, medical and diagnostic labs, home care services and other ambulatory services), hospitals and nursing and residential care facilities (Table 6). Table 5 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact Output (Sales) $51,131,975 1.40 $71,672,980 Labor Income $26,888,328 1.23 $33,128,203 Employment (Jobs) 590 1.34 793 Source: IMPLAN, 2014 Table 6 Direct Economic Impact of the Healthcare Subsectors Healthcare Subsector Output (Sales) Labor Income Employment Ambulatory Healthcare Services $23,130,386 $11,462,056 259 Hospitals* $17,639,559 $8,221,483 140 Nursing & Residential Care Facilities $10,362,031 $7,204,789 191 * Includes health care institutions that provide medical, diagnostic, and treatment services that include physician, nursing, and other health services to inpatients and the specialized accommodation services required by inpatients. (BLS, https://www.bls.gov/iag/tgs/iag622.htm) Source: IMPLAN, 2014 Overall, through direct, indirect and induced effects, the total economic impact of the healthcare sector is nearly $72 million in sales, $33 million in labor income and almost 793 jobs in Woodford County. Prepared By: Community and Economic Development Initiative of Kentucky (CEDIK), 2016 Questions or concerns regarding this analysis should be directed to Dr. Alison Davis, Executive Director at CEDIK via e-mail, at Alison.Davis@uky.edu.