M54. Developing Rates for Small Systems. Second Edition. Copyright 2016 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.

Similar documents
WATER USER RATES & FEE STUDY

Santa Clarita Water Division

The City of Sierra Madre

April 6, Katherine Godbey Director of Finance, Coachella Valley Water District Hovley Lane East Palm Desert, CA 92260

YORK COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA

Town of Hillsborough. City Council Public Hearing. Water Rate Cost-of-Service Study. February 13, 2017

FORT COLLINS- LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT

LAKE DON PEDRO COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Policy and Procedures Manual

City of Cocoa FY 2010 Utility Rate Study. Final Report. Water, Sewer & Reclaimed Water Rates, Fees & Charges Study. Prepared by:

Temescal Valley Water District

WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY

Valencia Water Company. Cost of Service Study

YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT

BEST PRACTICE 3: System Water Loss Control Overview Why a Best Practice? State Planning Requirements

2016 Water and Recycled Water Rate Study PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 12, 2016

Toledo Area Water Authority Memorandum of Understanding

WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES RATE STUDY

CAPITAL RECOVERY POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS

MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT FINANCIAL PLAN AND RATE AND FEE STUDY FINAL REPORT. September 2013

DOMESTIC SERVICE CHARGE:

WATER RATE AND FINANCIAL POLICY TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES WATER DIVISION

2016 Water and Recycled Water Rate Study WEBINAR WITH DISTRICT STAFF JUNE 29, 2016

Final COST OF SERVICE STUDY SEPTEMBER City of San Clemente

WATER UTILITY FINANCIAL PLAN AND RATE STUDY CITY OF WHITEFISH, MT MARCH 2016

Water and Sewer Utility Rate Studies

Contents. List of Figures, ix. List of Tables, xi. Foreword, xv. Acknowledgments, xvii. Introduction, xix. Section I Revenue Requirements, 1

CITY OF RAPID CITY. Financial and Rate Setting Policies for the Water and Water Reclamation Utilities

Final Report COMPREHENSIVE WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE AND RATE STUDY

UTILITY RATE STUDY. Public Hearing

Water Rates Adjustments Phase 2

From: Lex Warmath and Elaine Conti, Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc.

La Cañada Irrigation District

WORKSHOP BRIEFING DOCUMENT: Comprehensive Water and Wastewater Rate and Charge Study

Water & Sewer Rate Study. Water & Sewer Cost of Service Rate Study. City of Norco, CA. Draft Report for


NALDRAFT SEPTEMBER2015 WASTEWATE

LONG BEACH WATER DEPARTMENT COST OF SERVICE AND RATE STUDY

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Consulting Engineering Services for: Troutdale Water Master Plan

City of Norco WATER AND SEWER RATES Frequently Asked Questions

Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District 2018 Operating Budget

WATER AND SEWER RATE STUDY

2019 CITRUS HEIGHTS WATER DISTRICT BUDGET, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) AND RATE PRESENTATION

City and Borough of Juneau, AK WATER UTILITY AND WASTEWATER UTILITY RATE STUDY

SAN ANTONIO WATER SYSTEM (SAWS) RATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE: MEETING 3

City of Houston, Texas, Ordinance No

Focused Water Rate Study

Water, Sewer and Storm Sewer Rate Analysis

Comprehensive Water Rate Study

PORTLAND WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES. Policy 675 INFRASTRUCTURE SURCHARGE AND CAPITAL RESERVE ACCOUNTS

Sewer Rate Study CRESCENT CITY CALIFORNIA

SPRINGVILLE CITY CULINARY WATER IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA) MAY 2014

BODEGA BAY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT Water and Wastewater Rate Study

Rainbow Municipal Water District

WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EVANSTON AND THE VILLAGE OF MORTON GROVE AND THE VILLAGE OF NILES

Squaw Valley PSD. Water & Sewer Rate and Connection Fee Study. Presented by: Shawn Koorn Associate Vice President HDR Engineering, Inc.

Rate Comparison & Benchmarking Analysis

WATER ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN

PEPCO CUSTOMER NET ENERGY METERING CONTRACT. Qualifying facility of 1000 KW or less

M E M O R A N D U M. Issue

CITY OF CALISTOGA WATER RATE STUDY FINAL REPORT

Reserve Analysis Report

City of Ann Arbor, MI Water and Sewer Cost of Service Study Final Draft Report

Diablo Water District 2018 Facility Reserve Charge & MERA Update

Diablo Water District PRELIMINARY DRAFT 2016 Facility Reserve Charge & MERA Update

12 Months Master Pay Scale Salary Table

CITY OF OXNARD PUBLIC WORKS INTEGRATED MASTER PLAN DRAFT WATER COST OF SERVICE STUDY. FINAL July 2017

WATER AND SEWER SERVICES AGREEMENT

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library.

FY18 SCHEDULE OF USER FEES October 1, 2017 September 30, UTILITIES - RECLAIMED WATER Adopted

ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE. November 27, :30 PM Greenspot Road, Highland CA AGENDA

SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

Reserve Analysis Report

SQUAW VALLEY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT

Valuation for M&A. Building Value in Private Companies Second Edition CHRIS M. MELLEN FRANK C. EVANS. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Study Workshops are designed to be both educational and to seek broad direction from the Board

Wastewater Rate Study. Villa Park, Illinois

Goleta Water District

Impact Fees for Wastewater Systems

Table 2-2 Projected Water Production and Costs

WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER, AND MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY

COST OF SERVICES STUDY WORKSHOP

APPENDIX A. Effective January 1, WATER AND SEWER TAP FEES - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TAP FEE

City of Fridley Water and Sewer Rate Study. Jessica Cook 9/25/17

Page 2 of 11. Operating Fund Current Plan Last Plan Target 25. Rev vs. Exp 50 CIP. Long-Term Borrowing Current Plan Last Plan

ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, ZONE 7

ES.1 Findings and Recommendations... ES Overview Current Rates Rate Making Objectives

TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION WATER RATES ANALYSIS REPORT OCTOBER 7, 2009

Public Works and Development Services

WHEREAS, the rates of the Proposed Ordinance take into account the cost of service study recently completed by LADWP; and

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) FOR AUDIT SERVICES February 25, 2015

Asset Management Plan... Your Blueprint to Success By Timothy Stinson, P.E.* Presented January 17, 2013

Q Quarterly Report

Revised Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No E Cancelling Revised Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No E. ELECTRIC SCHEDULE ET Sheet 1 MOBILEHOME PARK SERVICE

THE NARRAGANSETT ELECTRIC COMPANY POLICY 3 LINE EXTENSION AND CONSTRUCTION ADVANCE POLICY

~RLY AGENDA REPORT. Daniel E. Cartagena, Senior Management Analyst

Asset Management Plan Summary Report Adopted May 2012

Cost Recovery Policy. Revised January Mount Pleasant Waterworks Cost Recovery Policy

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE To Be Entitled:

CITY OF CITY OF SONOMA FULLERTON. Pricing Objectives Discussion Water Rate Study 2018 Water Rate Study

(a) All community water systems shall comply with the cross-connection control requirements specified in this section.

Transcription:

M54 Developing Rates for Small Systems Second Edition

Contents List of Figures, v List of Tables, vii Preface, ix Acknowledgments, xiii Chapter 1 Basics of Water Ratemaking... 1 Basic Premise, 1 Water Utility Service, 1 Financial Self Sufficiency, 1 The Financial Plan, 2 Cost-of-Service Rate Study, 2 Implementing Rates, 3 Periodic Reviews, 4 Chapter 2 Customer Account and Usage Data... 5 Customer Information, 6 Importance of Customer Records, 7 Customer Classes, 11 Equivalent Residential Units, 13 Chapter 3 Preparing a Financial Plan and Evaluating Revenue Sufficiency... 17 Overview of the Financial Planning Process, 17 Development of the Financial Plan, 18 Establishing Target Reserve Balances, 26 General Overview of Common Industry Practices, 27 Summary of the Financial Plan, 29 Overview of the Revenue Sufficiency Evaluation, 29 Evaluating the Sufficiency of Revenues Projected Under Existing Rates, 31 Developing a Plan of Rate Revenue Adjustments, 31 Evaluating Alternative Plans for Rate Revenue Adjustments, 32 Chapter 4 Rate Design... 37 Rate or Pricing Objectives, 38 Rate Design Concepts, 39 Rate Evaluation, 43 Other Considerations, 44 Chapter 5 The Rate Adoption Process... 47 Strategic and Procedural Considerations, 47 Rate Change Phase-In Plans, 48 Regulatory Approval of Rates, 48 Customer and Stakeholder Involvement, 49 Interest Group Meetings, 50 Putting It All Together, 50 Appendix A Alternative Cash Flow Plans... 53 iii

Appendix B Examples of Financial Policies... 57 Cost Recovery Policy, 57 Debt Policy, 58 Investment Policy, 58 AWWA Policy Finance, Accounting, and Rates, 59 Appendix C Frequently Used Financing Sources for Water Utilities... 61 Index, 65 List of Manuals, 73 iv

AWWA MANuAL M54 Chapter 1 Basics of Water Ratemaking BASIC PREMISE Water utility services are best provided by autonomous and financially independent utilities. Autonomous service means that the utility does not rely in any substantial way on outside agencies or entities for financial support. This also implies that the revenues collected by the utility are sufficient to operate and maintain the fixed assets as well as meet the ongoing operational needs of the utility over time while minimizing long-term financial costs for the users. WATER UTILITY SERVICE Although water itself, whether obtained from surface water or groundwater sources, is often free, the collection, treatment, and distribution of water to customers are not free. Services that are typically provided by water utilities include: water supply, storage, treatment, transmission, distribution, fire protection, metering, administration, billing, and customer service. The cost of each of these functions may be tracked in the utility s cost accounting system by various levels of detail. The cost of water utility service is typically expressed in annual operations and maintenance and annual capital costs. FINANCIAL SELF SUFFICIENCY The financing of water utilities in North America relies substantially on rates and fees charged to the utility s customers. Other sources of financing (e.g., property tax revenue, 1

2 DEVELOPING RATES FOR SMALL SYSTEMS support from the community s general governmental funds, federal and state grants) have become increasingly less common. Meeting the financial needs of the utility has become an important responsibility of the utility s management and policymakers. THE FINANCIAL PLAN A financial plan is (see chapter 3) used by a utility to ensure its long-term capital and operating needs are met by future water rates. Figure 1-1 presents a basic schematic of a financial plan. In addition to annual operation and maintenance costs the plan should also address the capital costs needs of the utility. For utility planning, a multiyear financial plan is recommended that determines the annual revenue needs to prudently fund the utility s operating and capital needs. An engineering master plan is the ideal starting point for determining capital costs. An engineering study of the infrastructure needed to serve projected levels of water demand in the longer term provides such information. The next step is the development of a capital improvements program (CIP). A CIP is a systematic listing of needed improvements ordered by priority and year. It usually spans a minimum of five years but may be longer. Ongoing operational costs also need to be studied. These include treatment costs, staff, administration, ongoing maintenance, meter reading, billing, and so on. COST-OF-SERVICE RATE STUDY Figure 1-2 presents six commonly followed steps to conduct a cost-of-service rate study. These steps are more fully described in AWWA Manual M1. A brief description of the process follows. The first step in developing cost-of-service rates is to determine the revenue requirements. The revenue requirements for most utilities are taken directly from the utility s financial plan discussed in later in chapter 3 of this manual. The rates calculated by the cost-of-service study are set to generate an amount of revenue equal to the revenue requirements. Figure 1-1 Schematic of a financial plan

BASIcs of WATER RATEMAkING 3 Figure 1-2 Cost-of-service steps As a next step, in addition to determining revenue requirements, a cost-of-service study will often examine how the utility places customers into classes. Some small systems may have only one class of customers. Others may have separate classes for singlefamily residential, multifamily residential, commercial, institutional, irrigation, and so on. When a utility separates customers into classes, it generally adopts separate rates for each class to recognize the differences in the costs incurred to serve each class. The third step in a cost-of-service study is normally to assign costs to functions. Common water system functions include source of supply, treatment, pumping, storage, transmission and distribution, meters and services, customer service, and billing. After assigning costs to water system functions, the rate analyst develops unit costs for each function based on how the utility s customers use the system. These unit costs serve as the basis for the cost-of-service rates. Once the unit costs by function are determined for each function, the analyst distributes these costs to each customer class by multiplying the units of service demanded by each customer class by the unit costs for each function. The product resulting from this multiplication is called the cost-of-service for the customer class. The final step in a typical cost-of-service study is to select a rate design. The rate design is the specific set of rates for each class of customer to recover the cost-of-service for that customer class. Most rate designs use the unit costs developed in a cost-of-service study to set the fixed charges (i.e., that part of the rate design that does not vary with the amount of water used but may vary with the size of the meter) and the volume charges. Chapter 4 of this manual discusses the rate design process. IMPLEMENTING RATES After a rate design has been selected and rates calculated, the utility should consider engaging its customers in a public process. That process could range from a simple public presentation to more complicated presentations using study/focus groups with representative customers. Chapter 5 discusses the rate adoption process in more detail.

4 DEVELOPING RATES FOR SMALL SYSTEMS PERIODIC REVIEWS Regular reviews of the utility s financial status are critically important to stay abreast of revenue needs, meet operational needs, and help the utility to achieve long-term cost efficiencies. Many utilities benefit from conducting these reviews annually as part of their budgeting process. In those cases, the utility may update its financial plan based on changes that have occurred since adopting the current rates. Minimally, the periodic review should include: Assessments of revenue received versus expenses Operational cost trends versus budgets Capital cost expenditures trends versus capital plan Maintaining sufficient operational and capital reserves Condition assessment of major fixed assets Trends in customer use (including the effects of conservation)