Key State TANF Policies Affecting Microenterprise: Colorado

Similar documents
Key State TANF Policies Affecting Microenterprise. California

DEVELOPING POLICIES A GUIDE TO THE LAW TO SUPPORT MICROENTERPRISE IN THE TANF STRUCTURE: by Mark Greenberg Center for Law and Social Policy

The TANF Reconciliation Bill Provisions

By Mark Greenberg January 30, The TANF Participation Rate Structure under the Budget Reconciliation Bill: A Summary of the Rules

Changes in TANF Work Requirements Could Make Them More Effective in Promoting Employment

Final Guidance Paper Welfare Transition Program Performance Measures

Frozen at $16.5 billion through FY pregnancy reduction and twoparent. need to be targeted to lowincome

WikiLeaks Document Release

TANF at 20. Susan Golonka, Acting Director Office of Family Assistance. National Governor s Association Kansas City, MO June 28, 2016

WHAT S IN THE FISCAL YEAR 2013 BUDGET FOR TANF?

Contact Anita Neumann, Senate Family and Early Childhood Education Fiscal Analyst at 651/ or at

Welfare to Work. Research Center IS WELFARE REFORM SUCCEEDING IN THE WASHINGTON AREA? in the Washington Area. Greater Washington.

17- May 1, Robyn Frost, Executive Director Massachusetts Coalition for the Homeless 15 Bubier Street Lynn, MA Dear M.

Minnesota TANF and SSP-MOE Engagement Summary Report

Cuts and Consequences:

Integrating TANF and WIA Into a Single Workforce System: An Analysis of Legal Issues

CalWORKs. Program and Budget History

Chairman Herger, and Members of the Subcommittee on Human Resources:

XX... 3 TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION... 3 CHAPTER 811. CHOICES... 4

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF): Issues for the 110th Congress

USING TANF FUNDS FOR HOUSING-RELATED BENEFITS TO PREVENT HOMELESSNESS. Barbara Sard

AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 SUMMARY - MEDICAID PROVISIONS

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

WHAT S IN THE PROPOSED FY 2016 BUDGET FOR TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF)?

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

THE UNITED STATES 2007

ARAPAHOE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES POLICY Attachment (6) to BoCC BSR dated Community Support Services

LaDonna Pavetti, Ph. D.: How to Improve TANF

Sources of Income for Older Persons, 2006

Opportunities under the Recovery Act for Income Support for Low Income Families

Chapter 4 Medicaid Clients

EARNED INCOME DISALLOWANCE (EID)

SUMMARY OF FINAL TANF RULES Some Improvements Around the Margins By Liz Schott

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF): Eligibility and Benefit Amounts in State TANF Cash Assistance Programs

The Ins and Outs of Delinking: Promoting Medicaid Enrollment of Children Who are Moving In and Out of the TANF System. March 1999.

W E L F A R E R U L E S D A T A B A SE. A Graphical Overview of State TANF Policies as of July 2016

10.11 MEDICAID FOR POVERTY-LEVEL PREGNANT WOMEN (Categorically Needy, Mandatory) A. INCOME DISREGARDS AND DEDUCTIONS

Colorado Department of Human Services

Improving Fiscal Accountability and Effectiveness of Services in the Kentucky Transitional Assistance Program

Welfare Rules Databook

Testimony for Public Hearing on the FY 2014 Budget of the Department of Human Services

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF): Eligibility and Benefit Amounts in State TANF Cash Assistance Programs

NORTH CAROLINA FAMILY ECONOMIC SECURITY PROFILE

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families: Spending and Policy Options

MEDICAID ELIGIBLE, BUT UNINSURED: THE NEW YORK STATE EXPERIENCE

K-1 APPENDIX K. SPENDING FOR INCOME-TESTED BENEFITS, FISCAL YEARS

New Federalism National Survey of America s Families

Part I Temporary Assistance

BEYOND WELFARE: NEW OPPORTUNITIES TO USE TANF TO HELP LOW-INCOME WORKING FAMILIES OVERVIEW

MFIP EMPLOYMENT SERVICES MANUAL DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES ATTACHMENT REVISED SECTIONS ISSUED 05/2018

Figure 1. Half of the Uninsured are Low-Income Adults. The Nonelderly Uninsured by Age and Income Groups, 2003: Low-Income Children 15%

Outcomes of the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families Employment Program

EID Frequently Asked Questions 2013

Made possible with funding from:

WAYS THAT STATES CAN SERVE FAMILIES THAT REACH WELFARE TIME LIMITS. by Liz Schott

Welfare and Child Care Reauthorization 2003: Options and Opportunities. June 1, 2003

Copyright 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

CalFresh Handbook : Work Incentive Nutritional Supplement (WINS)

Disallowance of Increase in Annual Income (Earned Income Disregard)

Welfare Policies in Tennessee and Eight Neighboring States

How Are Families Who Left Welfare Doing over Time? A Comparison of Two Cohorts of Welfare Leavers

Poverty Facts, million people or 12.6 percent of the U.S. population had family incomes below the federal poverty threshold in 2004.

16.5 CATEGORICALLY NEEDY, MANDATORY - FOR FAMILIES AND/OR CHILDREN. NOTE: No Categorically Needy coverage group is subject to a spenddown provision.

WELFARE REFORM AT AGE 15: A VANISHING SAFETY NET FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN

Put in place to assist the unemployed or underemployed.

Federal Reauthorization of Welfare Reform

Exhibit 3-7 Earned Income Disallowance (EID)

Why TANF Is Not a Model for Other Safety Net Programs

DESIGNING SOLELY STATE-FUNDED PROGRAMS Implementation Guide for One Win-Win Solution for Families and States By Liz Schott and Sharon Parrott

Need-Tested Benefits: Estimated Eligibility and Benefit Receipt by Families and Individuals

Patterns of Work Participation in CalWORKs

Chapter 811. Job Opportunities and Basic Skills

Tassistance program. In fiscal year 1998, it represented 18.2 percent of all food stamp

A DECADE OF WELFARE REFORM: FACTS AND FIGURES

Tassistance program. In fiscal year 1999, it 20.1 percent of all food stamp households. Over

Welfare Reform in the USA. Frank Fuentes Deputy Director, ACYF Administration for Children and Families

TANF FUNDS MAY BE USED TO CREATE OR EXPAND REFUNDABLE STATE CHILD CARE TAX CREDITS

Chapter 7. Government Subsidies and Income Support for the Poor

COMPARING RECENT DECLINES IN OREGON'S CASH ASSISTANCE CASELOAD WITH TRENDS IN THE POVERTY POPULATION

Welfare Rules Databook

A NEW OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE HEALTH CARE COVERAGE FOR NEW YORK S LOW-INCOME FAMILIES

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE BILL NO. 372

Virginia s Health Insurance Programs for Children and Pregnant Women An Overview

Chapter 6 FACTORS RELATED TO TOTAL TENANT PAYMENT AND FAMILY SHARE DETERMINATION [24 CFR Part 5, Subparts E and F; 982, 153, ] INTRODUCTION The

THE FOOD STAMP PROGRAM Working Smarter for Working Families by Dorothy Rosenbaum and David Super

C O M M I T T E E : H U M AN S E R V I C E S & W E L F A R E

WorkFirst NJ. Quarterly Progress Update March 2017 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF FAMILY DEVELOPMENT STATE OF NEW JERSEY

Chapter 3: American Free Enterprise Section 4

Welfare Rules Databook: State TANF Policies as of July Gretchen Rowe and Mary Murphy. The Urban Institute. September 2006

THE UNITED STATES 2005

Key Policy Issues for the. Next Phase of Welfare Reform

WASHINGTON STATE CHILD SUPPORT SCHEDULE

Report on the Outcomes and Characteristics of TANF Leavers

Study of Family Work Support Programs

TABLE OF CONTENTS TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) GUIDANCE MANUAL

U.S. Senate Finance Committee Coverage Policy Options Detailed Section by Section Summary May 18, 2009

Examining TANF Spending Priorities

IDA Participation and Public Benefits Eligibility 1 September 2004

Law and Economic Justice

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (P.L )

Transcription:

Key State TANF Policies Affecting Microenterprise: Colorado by Nisha Patel and Mark Greenberg October 2002 The Charles Stewart Mott Foundation microenterprise grantee in Colorado is Mi Casa Resource Center for Women in Denver. Colorado s restructured welfare program, Colorado Works, was implemented as a Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant program in July 1997. One distinctive feature of Colorado s initiative is that counties have substantial discretion in implementing the program. The state defines eligibility criteria, but counties have substantial latitude to design work programs and set other rules and policies. Colorado s average monthly TANF caseload was approximately 10,639 families in fiscal year 2001. The state caseload declined by 72 percent from fiscal year 1995 to 2001, compared to a 56-percent decline in the national caseload over the same time period. Colorado TANF Funding and Spending (in millions) Annual TANF block grant, FY 98-02 Supplemental grant, FY 98 Supplemental grant, FY 99 Supplemental grant, FY 00 Welfare-to-Work formula grant, FY 99 80% MOE obligation, FY 00 1 75% MOE obligation, FY 00 $136.1 $3.3 $6.6 $10.0 $9.9 $88.4 $82.9 State MOE spending (% of obligation), FY 00 $119.5 (108.1%) Unobligated TANF funds (FY 97 FY 00 combined) $0 Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families 1 In order to receive its full federal TANF grant, a state must meet a maintenance of effort (MOE) obligation. A broad range of spending for needy families, in and outside of the TANF cash assistance program, can count toward MOE. The MOE obligation is based on state expenditures for AFDC and a set of related programs in FY 1994. It is set at 80 percent of those expenditures, and is reduced to 75 percent if the state meets federal work participation rates. www.clasp.org (202) 906-8000 1015 15 th Street, NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20005

The state sets the floor for maximum monthly cash benefits, and counties have discretion to provide additional cash assistance. The maximum benefit level for single-parent families with two children is $356. 2 The state provides a slightly higher benefit level for two-parent families. Colorado ranks 32 nd among the 50 states and DC in terms of its TANF cash grant; the national average is $414 for a family of three. In 2001 Colorado had the 11 th lowest poverty rate among the states at 9.0 percent, compared to 11.6 percent for the U.S. as a whole. The state median income in 2001 was the eighth highest at $50,053; the national median was $42,873. 3 TANF Spending to Support Microenterprise The state has not identified any TANF block grant or state MOE funds to be used for microenterprise training or to support microenterprise initiatives. However, county programs may designate funds from their county block grant to support such efforts as they see fit. Initial Participation Requirements Colorado, like most states, elected to opt out of the federal two-month community service requirement. 4 The state requires adults to engage in work activities once they are determined to be ready to work, or after receiving assistance for 24 months, whichever is earlier. 5 Clients can meet this requirement by participating in a work activity authorized by the state 6 or any other work activity designed to lead to self-sufficiency as determined by the county and outlined in the Individual Responsibility Contract (IRC). Many states require applicants for cash assistance and/or participants in work activities to pursue an initial job search. Colorado does not require an initial job search and does not impose a fixed sequence of work activities, though counties are free to impose one. 2 Source: Burke, Vee. (2002). TANF Benefits and Earnings Limits, January 2002. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. 3 Poverty rates and median income are three-year averages for 1999-2001. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 2000, 2001, and 2002 Annual Demographic Supplements. This represents the most recent data available. 4 A federal TANF provision requires adults to participate in community service employment after receiving assistance for two months unless the state opts out of the requirement. 5 The federal TANF statute requires all adults receiving assistance to be engaged in work after they have received assistance for 24 months. States have broad discretion to define what counts as being engaged in work for purposes of the 24-month requirement. 6 Authorized work activities are: unsubsidized employment; subsidized private or public sector employment; work experience; on-the-job training; job search and job readiness assistance; community service programs; vocational educational training; provision of child care services to a participant in a community service program; job skills training directly related to employment; and education directly related to employment for those without a high school diploma or GED. 2

Countable Activities 7 A principal way in which participation in microenterprise training could count toward the federal participation rates is as vocational educational training. 8 Colorado defines vocational educational training as a short-term educational activity designed to lead to employment. Providers can include non-profit organizations. The state does not impose a cap on the number or proportion of participants in vocational educational training, but individual participation is limited to 12 months. The state has not explicitly addressed whether microenterprise training counts as vocational educational training. Although it is not specifically addressed in Denver County s work activity policy, microenterprise training is considered vocational educational training. It is an allowable work activity that counts toward federal TANF participation rates. Only 30 percent of those engaged in work activities in the county can be in vocational educational training and be countable toward participation rates. Colorado defines unsubsidized employment 9 as full-time work for which wages are paid entirely by the employer. There is no minimum earnings requirement. State policy does not address whether operating a microenterprise counts as unsubsidized employment, but the wording of the policy would not preclude counting microenterprise operation so long as the individual was engaged full time and was being paid by the business. Counties have discretion to allow clients to pursue self-initiated work activities. It appears that microenterprise training could be counted as a self-initiated activity in counties that do not elect to count it as vocational educational training. If participation in a self-initiated activity is included as part of a client s IRC, the family can receive support services such as child care while participating in the activity. The following table shows TANF work participation data the state reported for FY 98, FY 99, and FY 00. The caseload reduction credit reduced the required overall participation rate to 7.5 percent in FY 98, and to an effective rate of 0 percent in FY 99 and FY 00. The fifth row compares the number of families reported as engaged in vocational educational training to the minimum number 7 Under the federal TANF statute, a state may be penalized if it fails to meet overall and two-parent TANF participation rates. The law specifies the number of weekly hours required to be a countable participant and the permissible activities that can count toward participation. States can authorize and fund activities that are not countable toward the federal participation rate. 8 Under the federal TANF statute, only certain activities are countable toward TANF participation rates. Vocational educational training provides the principal category in which participation in education or training can count toward TANF participation rates. States can set their own reasonable definitions of what counts as vocational educational training, but countable participation is limited to 12 months per individual. No more than 30 percent of those counted toward the work participation rate can be in vocational educational training. Effective in FY 00, the 30- percent limit applied to the combination of individuals in vocational educational training and parents under age 20 engaged in school completion. A state is free to allow individuals to participate in vocational educational training for more than 12 months, but only 12 months will be countable toward participation rates. 9 For federal purposes, hours participating in unsubsidized employment are countable toward TANF participation rates. The federal law does not define unsubsidized employment or require a minimum amount of earnings, and states are permitted to develop their own reasonable definitions. 3

of families participating in any countable activity that Colorado needed to meet its required overall participation rate, and shows that 121 percent were reported as being engaged in vocational educational training in FY 98. This is a high proportion relative to other states, in part because Colorado has had a relatively large caseload decline. However, because of the caseload reduction credit and the share of families engaged in unsubsidized employment, the state would have fully satisfied the required participation rate in FY 98 simply because a sufficient number of families were participating in unsubsidized employment. Thus, in FY 98, Colorado could have allowed more families to participate in microenterprise training outside the rate. In FY 99 and FY 00, the state had an effective participation rate of 0 percent, and therefore, could have allowed many more families to participate in microenterprise training without being concerned about counting them toward a federal participation rate. (See row six.) Reported TANF Work Participation in Colorado FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Families in overall participation rate 10 12,501 8,187 5,625 Families counting toward work participation rate 3,608 3,005 2,078 Overall participation rate achieved 11 28.7% 36.4% 36.6% Overall participation rate required (30% for FY 98, 35% for FY 99, and 40% for FY 00; adjusted downward for caseload reduction credit) Families engaged in vocational educational training (as % of participating families needed to meet overall rate) 12 7.5% 0.0% 0.0% 1,135 (121%) Families engaged in unsubsidized employment (as % of participating families needed to meet overall rate) 12 1,894 (202%) Number of participating families needed to meet overall participation rate required (adjusted downward for caseload reduction credit) Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families Sanctions for Failing to Comply with Work Requirements 908 1,716 509 1,121 938 N/A N/A Colorado policy sets minimum sanctions for failure to participate in work requirements, and counties have discretion to increase the sanction amount and duration. Denver County s sanction policies are the same as the minimum sanctions required by state law. The first sanction for failing to comply with work requirements is a 25-percent reduction in the family s cash benefit for one month. If the sanctioned individual does not come into compliance within one month, the grant 10 This figure is smaller than the total number of families receiving assistance because some families are not included in this participation rate denominator. 11 The overall participation rates provided in the third row represent the average of monthly participation rates for the year. 12 These figures are calculated by multiplying the required overall participation rate by the number of families in the rate, and then dividing the number of families reported as engaged in each activity by the product. 4

reduction increases to 50 percent for one month. If the client does not come into compliance by the end of the second month, a full-family sanction is imposed for a minimum of three months, and the family must go through the assessment process again and develop and sign a new IRC before Colorado Works benefits can be reinstated. For subsequent instances of failure to comply with work requirements, the sanction begins at the next level beyond that which the prior sanction ended. Time Limit Colorado has a 60-month lifetime time limit. For those subject to the time limit, assistance to the entire family is terminated after 60 cumulative months of receiving TANF cash assistance. Months of assistance began counting toward the time limit in July 1997. As of April 2001, the state had not established exemptions, circumstances under which a month of assistance would not count toward the time limit, or circumstances under which assistance could be extended for families that reach the time limit. A state-convened county/state work group was finalizing recommendations on criteria for hardship exemptions from the time limit. Rules were expected to be in place by October 1, 2001. The time limit clock runs while clients are participating in microenterprise training or operating a microenterprise. Treatment of Income For determining both ongoing Colorado Works eligibility and benefit amount, the following disregards are applied to monthly earned income: $90 work expense disregard, $30 (limited to 12 months), and 1/3 of the remainder (limited to four consecutive months). Applicants for TANF get the benefit of only the $90 work expense disregard when their financial eligibility is determined. Colorado also has a fill-the-gap policy, meaning that the cash grant is reduced by less than one dollar for each dollar of countable earnings. A single-parent recipient family with two children remains eligible for TANF in Colorado as long as the parent s monthly earnings are less than $752. 13 During the 2001 legislative session, a bill was passed to modify the earned income disregard to 2/3 of the participant s gross income for 12 cumulative months. The gross income test does not apply to a participant during those months. After the receipt of the 12 cumulative months of disregard, the income disregard for Colorado Works reverts to the $30 and 1/3 described in the previous paragraph. This change was anticipated to become effective on July 1, 2001. Loans are exempt from consideration as either income or resources. For individuals engaged in self-employment, the net profit from self-employment is considered earned income, and is defined as gross income from an activity designed to produce a profit, minus the cost of doing business. Treatment of Resources The resource limit for Colorado Works eligibility is $2,000. The full value of one car is excluded when counting a family s resources. Personal property needed for self-employment, such as sales 13 These rules are applicable only for the first four months. Since the $30 and 1/3 earnings disregards are time limited, the amount a parent can earn and still be eligible for TANF decreases over time. 5

stock, inventory, or tools, is exempt from consideration as a resource. Colorado also has a pre- TANF law allowing public assistance recipients to maintain a business bank account that is not counted for purposes of the resource test, as long as funds in the account are not used for personal purposes. Colorado has an Individual Development Account (IDA) program that authorizes counties to allow Colorado Works families to open IDAs and accumulate savings that are not counted toward the resource limit. IDA funds can be used for business capitalization, higher education, and home purchase. Supportive Services Child care Colorado guarantees child care assistance to Colorado Works families with children under age 13 who are participating in work activities or need child care in order to accept or keep a job. If a client is approved by the local welfare office to participate in microenterprise training, child care assistance will be available. In cases where operating a microenterprise counts as unsubsidized employment, child care assistance will be provided for these purposes. Transitional child care assistance is not guaranteed for families leaving TANF for employment. Subject to available funding, the Colorado Child Care Assistance Program (CCCAP) provides subsidized child care for working families with income up to 130 percent of the federal poverty line, and allows counties to provide assistance to families up to 185 percent of poverty. In Denver County, the income limit for subsidized child care is 185 percent of the federal poverty line ($2,255 per month for a family of three). Families must make co-payments for subsidized child care on an income-based sliding scale. An individual operating a microenterprise is eligible for CCCAP if (s)he can show verification of self-employment tax status and has net income gains from selfemployment. Medicaid Colorado provides a joint application for Colorado Works and Medicaid. Under the state s Section 1931 Medicaid eligibility rules, families must meet July 1996 AFDC income and resource eligibility tests to be eligible for Medicaid. 14 Colorado increased the Colorado Works resource standard to $2,000 (from $1,000 under AFDC); this more generous standard does not apply when determining Medicaid eligibility. Families who cease to be eligible for Section 1931 Medicaid due to earnings from employment are guaranteed transitional Medicaid for up to 12 months. 14 The 1996 welfare law delinked Medicaid from family cash assistance, meaning that TANF recipients are not automatically eligible for Medicaid. The law created new eligibility criteria known as Section 1931, mandating Medicaid eligibility for families that meet a state s AFDC income, resource, and family composition standards in effect on July 16, 1996. States have limited ability to modify these requirements, although a state can broaden Medicaid eligibility by changing its methodology for calculating income or resources for purposes of determining eligibility. Because TANF and Medicaid eligibility rules may no longer be identical, it is possible that some family members could qualify for TANF but not Medicaid, and in many instances family members will qualify for Medicaid but not for TANF. 6

Colorado only covers federally mandated groups in Medicaid. 15 Child Health Plan Plus (CHP+), the state s Children s Health Insurance Program, provides subsidized health insurance to children under age 18 in families with incomes below 185 percent of poverty. Transportation Each Colorado county determines its own policies regarding supportive services. Denver County will provide bus passes and other supports determined necessary to participants for whom microenterprise training is an allowable work activity. 15 States are required to provide Medicaid coverage to children under age six with incomes below 133 percent of poverty and children born after September 30, 1993, with incomes below 100 percent of poverty. 7