IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. No. 1 : 18 - C R - Q 74. Count One

Similar documents
Case 1:05-cr EWN Document 1 Filed 12/20/2005 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

ORIGINAL c:iled \!'\ CH..1E.EHS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINE SVILLE DIVISION

Case 3:12-cr HZ Document 25 Filed 04/24/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/20/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/20/2017 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:12-cr WYD Document 1 Filed 10/24/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:17-cr AT-CMS Document 7 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 18

2G17 SEP 2 6 Prl 3 22 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,('--,,; _.._ "9RIMINAL NO. 3:17CFJ:lj._J_/ftfn

Case 3:18-cr BTM Document 1 Filed 06/29/18 PageID.9 Page 1 of 11. saf/\laif;\ co CASE UNSEALED PER ORDER OF COURT

Case 1:05-cr RWR Document 1 Filed 08/04/2005 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cr LY Document 3 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 9. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS jp PH 1: 21 AUSTIN DIVISION

COUNT ONE. (Conspiracy to Commit Securities Fraud) RELEVANT PERSONS AND ENTITIES

FILED IN OPEN COURT U.S.D.C. Atlanta

Case 1:13-cr RWS-ECS Document 1 Filed 02/19/13 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : Hon. INDICTMENT

Case 1:14-cr PLM Doc #1 Filed 07/24/14 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * * * * * ****** INDICTMENT. COUNT ONE (Wire Fraud)

Case 1:10-cr BEL Document 1 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN (WATERLOO) DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 18-CR-2058.

THE GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 3:13-cr KI Document 1 Filed 07/16/13 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 3:13-cr AWT Document 2 Filed 05/21/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Criminal NO. 3:13CR~S (llwrj -'"

Case 2:17-cr GMS Document 3 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT. Introduction

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * * * * * * * * * * ******* SECOND SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT

Case 4:15-cr WTM-GER Document 1 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION

us OJ $TRICT COUR-1 RIO/\

Case 1:09-cr RJL Document 3 Filed 12/11/09 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

4:10-cv TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

3:06-ar Date Filed 11/01/2006 Entry Number 259 (Court only) Page 1 of 10

Case 2:18-cr JS Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INDICTMENT COUNT ONE BACKGROUND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. No. INDICTMENT UNDER SEAL COUNT ONE

Case 2:12-cr RWS Document 1 Filed 08/22/12 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

DAVID MAKOL, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and charges as follows: COUNT ONE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (TOPEKA DOCKET)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Department of Justice. U.S. Attorney s Office. Southern District of New York. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Thursday, September 10, 2015

Case 2:13-cr ES Document 11 Filed 11/18/13 Page 1 of 35 PageID: 62

Case 1:17-cv VSB Document 1 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

v. INDICTMENT NO. "-;fklt',j ~-- lfr/t

Case 1:17-cr AT-JKL Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 6. Count One. Beginning from on or about February 1,2013, and continuing to on or about

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DAVID B. CHALMERS, JR., : S1 05 Cr. 59 (DC) JOHN IRVING, LUDMIL DIONISSIEV, : BAYOIL (USA), INC., and BAYOIL SUPPLY & TRADING LIMITED, : COUNT ONE

Case 1:14-cr JEI Document 28 Filed 05/09/14 Page 1 of 26 PageID: 105 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THEDISTRICTOFNEW JERSEY

Case 3:15-cr JRS Document 1 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE~ EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 1:13-cr CMH Document 12 Filed 09/19/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 39

Case 1:15-cr KAM Document 1 Filed 12/14/15 Page 1 of 29 PageID #: 1

Case 1:10-cr REB Document 5 Filed 06/08/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:14-cr JAR Document 1 Filed 08/06/14 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (KANSAS CITY DOCKET)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THE UNITED STATES GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT: INTRODUCTION

Courthouse News Service

Case 2:12-cr WHW Document 1 Filed 01/12/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 1

Case 4:15-cr Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 11/27/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA INDICTMENT FOR HOBBS ACT EXTORTION, FAILURE TO FILE TAX RETURNS, AND ILLEGAL STRUCTURING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. ) Civil Action No. ) CV-03-J-0615-S. Defendants. )

- - X CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE IEEPA AND THE ITR AND TO CONDUCT AN UNLICENSED MONEY TRANSMITTING BUSINESS. Background

Case 2:13-cr LDD Document 24 Filed 06/19/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ORIGINAL. -l^ K CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 2 '7 L'I FEB UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Courthouse News Service

Case 5:09-cr D Document 1 Filed 04/16/09 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv M Document 1 Filed 05/23/13 Page 1 of 16 PageID 1

INDICTMENT COUNT ONE. The Grand Jury for the District of Maryland charges that: Introduction

- against - 5 (T. 15, U.S.C., 78j(b) ULPH CIOFFI and BLOCK, J, and 78ff; T. 18, U.S.C., MATTHEW T WIN, 371, 1343, 2, GO, M.J.

Case 2:16-cr RWS-JCF Document 1 Filed 02/03/16 Page 1 of 10

COUNT ONE. (Conspiracy To Commit Securities Fraud) RELEVANT PERSONS AND ENTITIES. 1. At all times relevant to this Indictment, SafeNet,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 1 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. v. ) Civil Action No.

Case 1:10-cr PLF Document 1 Filed 11/09/10 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ROOKSIJOHNSON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. BERRY LOUIDORT RALPH MICHEL and LAUREN JASKY,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. CR No. 08- :2.80 -I?," 18 U.S.C U.S.c U.S.C U~S.C.

INTRODUCTION. At all times relevant to this Superseding Indictment: 1. The defendants MATTHEW BURSTEIN, ELIAS COMPRES,

RECEIVED SEP Case 3:18-cr MAS Document 64 Filed 09/25/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 89 WILLAM T. WALSHJ.D STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/18/17 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 5:12-cv BYP Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/15/12 1 of 10. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO COMPLAINT

muia'aiena ED) wnrn 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION FRANKFORT V. INDICTMENT NO. * * * * * COUNT 1 18 U.S.C.

Case 1:17-cr NGG Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 1. - against - Cr. No. (T. 15, U.S.C., 80b-6, 80b-I4 and 80b-17;

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants

INTRODUCTION. At all times relevant to this Indictment, unless otherwise indicated:

Defendant. Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

x. 10 Cr. COUNT ONE BACKGROUND. 1. ANTHONY DIGATI, the defendant, a resident of. former registered agent and manager of New York

Fraud, Manipulation and Deception: CFTC/SEC Proposed Rules

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:12-cr CM Document 1 Filed 04/18/12 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (KANSAS CITY DOCKET)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff. Defendants.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. For the Western District of New York

Case: 4:15-cr CDP-JMB Doc. #: 2 Filed: 07/23/15 Page: 1 of 16 PageID #: 11

240.17a b-5 01; 18 U.S C. 2. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Violations of. Defendant. DAVID G. FRIEHLING, a~5,

Case 1:08-cr Document 3 Filed 08/07/2008 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE. INDICTMENT v. NO. 18 U.S.C. 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICTOF FLORIDA. Plaintiff. Defendants. CLASS ACTIONCOMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2:11-cr MPM -DGB # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:10-cr LMB Document 1 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOF EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action No.

Transcription:

ORIGINAL j IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION F/Lt~IN OPEN COURT.D.c. -Atlan ta MAR 1 3 2018 JAMESN By: -L. HA?, Clerk.Jf!V" Deputy cierk UNITED STA TES OF AMERICA v. JUN YING Criminal Indictment No. 1 : 18 - C R - Q 74 THE GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT: Count One 1. On or about August 28, 2017, in the Northern District of Georgia and elsewhere, the defendant, JUN YING, did knowingly execute and attempt to execute a scheme and artifice (1) to defraud other persons in connection with securities of Equifax Inc., and (2) to obtain, by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, money and property in connection with the purchase and sale of securities of Equifax Inc., an issuer with a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Background At all times relevant to this Indictment 2. Equifax Inc. was a consumer credit reporting agency headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. Equifax was a public company whose stock was traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the ticker symbol EFX. Equifax's

securities were registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act. 3. JUN YING was the Chief Information Officer for Equifax's U.S. Information Solutions. 4. Equifax required its officers, directors, and employees, including JUN YING, to abide by its Business Ethics and Compliance Program, which included an Insider Trading Policy. The Insider Trading Policy provided that employees may not trade in Equifax securities if they "are aware of material nonpublic information." 5. On July 25, 2017, JUN YING received an email reminding him that he could not trade in Equifax securities if he was aware of material nonpublic information. 6. From in or about mid-may 2017 through July 2017, unknown individuals obtained unauthorized access to some of Equifax's databases. As a result of this security breach, the unknown individuals acquired the names, Social Security numbers, birth dates, addresses and, in some instances, driver's license numbers of approximately 145 million people. 7. On or about July 29, 2017, Equifax discovered suspicious activity on its network. It began an investigation and remediation efforts. 8. Over the next several weeks, Equifax and its advisors reviewed forensic data to determine the scope of the intrusion. 9. On or about August 12, 2017, through August 15, 2017, Equifax changed internal administrative credentials for many internal databases. JUN 2

YING was aware of these changes and Equifax employees who reported to JUN YING were responsible for changes to some of these credentials. 10. By on or about August 15, 2017, Equifax had determined that consumers' personally identifiable information likely was taken as a result of the breach. 11. On or about August 15, 2017, Equifax imposed a special trading blackout date for its employees who were aware of the breach. 12. On or about Friday, August 25, 2017, JUN YING and several of Equifax employees who reported to him were asked to assist in responding to the breach, although he was not informed that Equifax had been breached. This work was portrayed as part of a breach opportunity involving a potential Equifax customer. 13. In texts sent by JUN YING on or about August 25, 2017, to W.M., JUN YING said "Sounds bad. We may be the one breached" and "I'm starting to put 2 and 2 together." 14. On or about Monday, August 28, 2017, JUN YING executed three web searches from his Equifax computer. a. The first was recorded by his computer as: https:/ /www.bing.com/search?q=experian+breach&form=edgtct&qs= AS&cvid=65590692da 184d718f9d32a608a 154fb&cc= US&setlang=en-US This url leads to a Bing search page showing a search that reads: "experian breach". b. The second was recorded by his computer as: 3

https:/ /www.bing.com/ search?q=experian+stock+price+9%2f15%2f2015 &form=edgear&qs=pf&cvid=a0663343a917 4835976613f92acdceea&cc= US&setlang=en-US This url leads to a Bing search page showing a search that reads: "experian stock price 9/15/2015". c. The third was recorded by his computer as: https: / / www.bing.com/ search? q=experian +breach+ 2015&form=EDGTC T &qs=as&cvid=oa9c3600b 1454b6e82edafd3bb5a5285&cc= US&setlang=en -US This url leads to a Bing search page showing a search that reads: "experian breach 2015". 15. JUN YING held stock options for Equifax securities in a UBS Financial Services account ending in 24 EF. 16. Less than an hour after the web searches described above, JUN YING accessed a UBS website. He executed trades that exercised all of his available stock options in the account ending in 24 EF, resulting in him receiving 6,815 shares of Equifax stock in the same account. JUN YING sold all of these shares, receiving over $950,000, for a realized gain of over $480,000. 17. On or about August 29, 2017, JUN YING texted M.D. "I think some big media announcement is coming about us" and "I think it might be bad." 18. Nine days later, on or about September 7, 2017, after the stock market had closed for the day, Equifax publicly disclosed the data breach. The following day, Equifax's stock dropped in price. 4

Defendant's Scheme to Defraud 19. In violation of his obligations under the Insider Trading Policy and of the fiduciary and other duties of trust and confidence that JUN YING owed to Equifax and its shareholders, on or about August 28, 2017, JUN YING traded in Equifax securities on the basis of material nonpublic information related to the data breach, and thereby earned illegal profits and illegally avoided losses. Execution of Defendant's Scheme to Defraud 20. On or about August 28, 2017, in the Northern District of Georgia and elsewhere, for the purpose of executing and attempting to execute his scheme and artifice to defraud, and to obtain money and property by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, JUN YING, exercised approximately 6,815 Equifax stock options and sold the resulting shares on the basis of material nonpublic information. All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1348. Count Two 21. The factual allegations set forth in paragraphs 2 through 18 are realleged and incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 22. On or about August 28, 2017, in the Northern District of Georgia and elsewhere, the defendant, JUN YING, by use of the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, the mails, and facilities of national securities exchanges, directly and indirectly, did knowingly and willfully use manipulative and deceptive devices and contrivances in connection with the purchase and sale of 5

securities of Equifax Inc. and did (a) employ a device, scheme and artifice to defraud; (b) make untrue statements of material facts and omit to state material facts necessary in order to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; and ( c) engage in acts, practices and courses of business which would and did operate as a fraud and deceit upon any person, in connection with the purchase and sale of said securities, in that the defendant JUN YING exercised approximately 6,815 Equifax stock options and sold the resulting shares on the basis of material nonpublic information. All in violation of Title 15, United States Code, Section 78j(b) and Section 78ff; and Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 240.lOb-5 and Section 240.lObS-l. Forfeiture Provision Upon conviction of one or more of the offenses alleged in Counts One and Two of this Indictment, the defendant, JUN YING, shall forfeit to the United States pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(l)(C), all property, real and personal, constituting or derived from proceeds traceable to the offense(s). If, as a result of any act or omission of the defendant, any property subject to forfeiture: a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third person; c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court; d. has been substantially diminished in value; or 6

e. has been commingled with other property which cannot be subdivided without difficulty; the United States intends, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 982(b)(1); Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p); and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), to seek forfeiture of any other property of said defendant up to the value of the forfeitable property. A BILL BYUNGJ.PAK United States Attorney CH~t~1UBER Assistant United States Attorney Gear ia Bar No. 545627. YN YM. A~ Assistant ited States Attorney Georgia Bar No. 661005 600 U.S. Courthouse 75 Ted Turner Drive SW Atlanta, GA 30303 404-581-6000; Fax: 404-581-6181 7