Federal Home Loan Banks

Similar documents
Credit Opinion: Federal Home Loan Banks

Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston

Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines

Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines

Credit Opinion: Federal Home Loan Bank of New York

Credit Opinion: Federal Home Loan Banks

Credit Opinion: Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco

OECD Workshop on Data Collection

State Outlook: Debt Affordability. NCSL Conference Gail Sussman, Managing Director

Mongolian Banking System

Snohomish County Public Utility District 1

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings

Findlay City School District, OH

Underwriting standards for credit cards and auto loans tighten modestly, a positive

Volusia County School District (FL)

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings in the European Union

CPPIB Capital Inc. Semiannual Update. Credit Strengths. Credit Challenges. Rating Outlook The rating outlook is stable.

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

Siauliu Bankas, AB. Siauliu Bankas capital metrics will strengthen with EBRD s debt-to-equity conversion. ISSUER COMMENT 13 August 2018

ABN AMRO Bank N.V. Q1 2018: Higher impairment offset revenue growth. ISSUER COMMENT 16 May Summary opinion

Township of Tredyffrin, PA

Butler (Village of), WI

Port Jefferson Union Free School District, NY

Credit Suisse International

Policy on the "SEC Rule 17g-7 of Representation and Warranties" (R&Ws)

Regional Economic Outlook

Rockwall County, TX. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Above average socioeconomic indices. Credit Challenge

Ag Lending Experience of Living Through the Cycles

Agenda. New Mexico School District Bond Ratings 9/8/17

Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Counterparty Risk Ratings to three Sri Lankan banks 18 Jun 2018

Credit Suisse International

City of Tega Cay, SC. Annual Comment on Tega Cay RATING. ISSUER COMMENT 23 March 2018

Export Development Canada

Rating Action: Moody's Upgrades the City of Sacramento, CA's Lease Revenue Bonds to A1; Confirms Ser and Ser. 1993A at A2; outlook is stable

Rating Action: Moody's reviews NORD/LB Luxembourg S.A. - Public-Sector Covered Bonds, direction uncertain 19 Dec 2018

Rating Action: Moody's announces rating actions on student loan ABS backed by FFELP student loans following the update of its rating methodology

Town of Easton, MA. Credit Strengths. Manageable long-term liabilities. Credit Challenges. Reliance on reserves to address budget gaps

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Yanlord to Ba2; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 25 Apr 2017

Rating Action: Moody's changes the outlook on FCA Bank's senior debt rating to positive from stable

Findlay City School District, OH

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Baa3 senior unsecured debt ratings of ICICI Bank's Bahrain branch Global Credit Research - 17 Aug 2017

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades South Carolina Public Service Authority revenue bonds; rating outlook negative

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aa1 issuer and bond ratings of the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) with a stable outlook

Celina Independent School District, TX

Global Credit Research - 19 Apr 2018

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to 2016B & C Senior Bonds of Central Florida Expressway Auth. (CFX), FL; Outlook positive

Roselle Park Borough, NJ

blend Funding plc Update to credit analysis Credit strengths » Liquidity reserve as structural enhancement Credit challenges

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades NORD/LB's Fuerstenberg preference shares to Caa1(hyb) Global Credit Research - 18 Apr 2018

PSP Capital Inc. Update to credit analysis. CREDIT OPINION 27 August Update

Auckland Housing Affordability Remains Poor Despite Improvement

Barcelona, City of. Annual update. Barcelona's good operating performance. B= Budget. PC: Pre-closing. Source: Issuer. Moody's Investors Service.

Disruption in Higher Education: What Does It Mean For Credit Ratings

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades several Irish mortgage covered bond ratings; actions conclude review

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Intrum Justitia's Ba2 corporate family rating; outlook changed to stable Global Credit Research - 19 Apr 2018

Town of Beekman, NY. Credit Strengths. Solid reserve and liquidity levels. Low debt burden with rapid repayment. Credit Challenges

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Suriname's issuer rating to B2 negative; concluding rating review Global Credit Research - 20 Feb 2018

Rating Action: Moody's reviews Depfa ACS Bank's public sector covered bonds for downgrade Global Credit Research - 14 Sep 2016

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to West Virginia SBA's $44.4M Capital Improvement Ref. Rev. Bonds, Ser Global Credit Research - 08 Sep 2017

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades the ratings of Philippine National Bank and Rizal Commercial Bank Global Credit Research - 23 Nov 2017

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Kommunalkredit Austria AG's public-sector covered bonds Global Credit Research - 25 Jul 2017

3i Group plc. Update following the publication of first-half 2018 financial results. CREDIT OPINION 28 November Update

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades mortgage covered bonds issued by AIB Mortgage Bank and EBS Mortgage Finance Global Credit Research - 29 Nov 2016

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, IL

Connecticut (State of) State Revolving Fund

Edison (Township of) NJ

Grinnell College, IA

Masconomet Regional School District, MA

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aaa IFS rating of New York Life; stable outlook Global Credit Research - 27 Jul 2017

PT Indosat Tbk. Strong Revenue and Earnings Growth in FY2015 Supports Credit Profile. ISSUER COMMENT 28 March 2016

Rating Action: Moody's reviews covered bonds issued by Hypo NOE, Hypo Tirol and Heta AR for upgrade Global Credit Research - 25 May 2016

Massachusetts (Commonwealth of)

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Coty's CFR to Ba3; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 20 Mar 2018

US Local Government GO Debt Methodology

Rating Action: Moody's takes rating actions on Irish mortgage covered bonds Global Credit Research - 26 Sep 2016

Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit, PA

Township of Nutley, NJ

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Bharti's senior unsecured notes to Ba1 and assigns a Ba1 CFR; outlook negative 05 Feb 2019

North American Development Bank Aa1 Stable

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Counterparty Risk Rating to FCA Bank

Weber School District, UT

Westport (Town of) CT

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to UConn GO bonds supported by State of Connecticut; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 29 Mar 2018

Jersey City Community Charter School, NJ

Columbia School District, MO

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades BAWAG's ratings to A2; outlook positive

WILTON (TOWN OF) CT. Update to credit analysis. Credit strengths. » Affluent residential tax base. Credit challenges

For personal use only

Credit Suisse Group AG

Policy for Analyst Rotation

Kaztemirtrans, JSC. Update following sovereign action, outlook changed to stable. CREDIT OPINION 3 August Update

CIMIC GROUP UPGRADED TO Baa2, OUTLOOK STABLE, BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE

Prince William County, VA

Credit Opinion: CNPC Captive Insurance Company Limited

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Banca Carige S.p.A. and places ratings under review for downgrade 07 Aug 2018

Montgomery County, TX

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades PGW (PA) to A3 from Baa1; Assigns A3 to $278.2 mil Gas Works Rev. Refunding Bds., 15th Series

Bothell (City of) WA

Rating Action: Moody's changes outlook of Central Bank of India and Indian Overseas Bank to positive from stable

Transcription:

CREDIT OPINION Federal Home Loan Banks Semiannual Update Update Summary Rating Rationale The Federal Home Loan Bank System's (FHLBank System or FHLBank) Aaa long term rating and Prime-1 short-term deposit ratings reflect the combination of the following elements: 1) an a1 baseline credit assessment (BCA), 2) very high support from the Aaa with a stable outlook rated US Government, and 3) high dependence between the FHLBanks and the US Government. Contacts Brian L. Harris Senior Vice President/ Manager brian.harris@moodys.com 212-553-4705 Jason Grohotolski 212-553-1067 VP-Sr Credit Officer jason.grohotolski@moodys.com CLIENT SERVICES Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454 The FHLBank System's a1 BCA reflects the FHLBank System's financial strength, earnings stability, excellent asset quality and special role as a provider of liquidity to US Financial Institutions. In arriving at the FHLBank System's BCA, Moody's considers the individual BCA of each of the FHLBanks as well as the profile of the FHLBank System as if it were one, combined entity. The FHLBank System's BCA incorporates the joint and several liability of all FHLBank consolidated obligations. The outlook on the FHLBanks is stable reflecting the stable outlook on the US government. Any rating actions on the US Government would likely result in all individual FHLBanks' longterm deposit ratings and the FHLBank System's long-term bond rating moving in lock step with any US sovereign rating action. Exhibit 1 Rating Scorecard - Key Financial Ratios [1] Federal Home Loan Banks 6.0% 80% 70% 5.0% 60% 4.0% 50% 3.0% 40% 30% 2.0% 20% 1.0% 0.31% 4.88% 5.16% 26.45% Mortgage Loans % Total Assets (LHS) TCE % (Total Assets Derivatives) (RHS) Liquid Assets % Short Term Debt (RHS) CAPITAL ADEQUACY LIQUIDITY 66.30% 0.0% 10% 0% Net Income % Tangible Assets (LHS) Advances % Total Assets (RHS) PROFITABILITY [1] As of 12/31/2017 Source: Moody's Financial Metrics ASSET RISK

Credit Strengths» Joint and several liability reduces default risk of the FHLBank System's consolidated obligations» Central liquidity provider to US Financial Institutions» Excellent asset quality of 1) the advance portfolio, 2) the investment portfolio excluding the private label RMBS portfolio, and 3) the mortgage loan portfolio Credit Challenges» Narrow charter and bank consolidation constrain growth and profitability» Substantial single borrower concentrations at individual FHLBanks» Material but declining private-label securities portfolio Rating Outlook Moody's stable outlook for the FHLBank System's long-term bond rating reflects the stable outlook of the US government's Aaa debt rating. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade An upgrade of the FHLBank System's BCA is unlikely. However, an upgrade of the BCA could occur if the FHLBanks re-focused their businesses such that advances represent more than 70% of assets while maintaining i) strong profitability as reflected by an ROAA consistently in excess of.35%, ii) a stable member profile and iii) continued strong asset quality. Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade Any rating actions on the US Government would likely result in all individual FHLBanks' long-term deposit ratings and the FHLBank System's long-term bond rating moving in lock step with any US sovereign rating action. Barring a downgrade of the US sovereign rating or a material downgrade of the FHLBank System's BCA, Moody's does not expect changes to the FHLBank System's long- and short-term bond ratings. This is due to the fact that the ratings incorporate an expectation of a very high degree of US Government support. Factors that could lead to a downgrade of the FHLBank System's BCA of a1 include materially higher loss expectations on the privatelabel RMBS portfolio, materially lower profitability (quarterly net losses over four quarters) or significant asset-liability mismatches. This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history. 2

Key indicators Exhibit 2 Federal Home Loan Banks [1] [2] 2017 [2] Total Assets (USD million) Tangible common equity (USD million) Total shareholders' equity (USD million) Return on average assets (FHLB) Return on average equity (FHLB) Advances % Total assets Mortgage Loans % Total assets Retained earnings and related reserves % Total assets Private Label MBS % Total Assets YTD net interest margin (FHLB) Total regulatory capital ratio Liquid Assets (FHLB) % Short term debt 1,103,451 56,915 57,752 0.31% 6.25% 66.30% 4.88% 1.64% 0.82% 0.42% 5.17% 26.45% 2016 [2] 2015 [2] 2014 [2] 2013 [2] 1,056,712 969,239 913,343 834,178 54,219 49,334 49,487 50,504 54,163 48,787 49,634 50,046 0.34% 0.31% 0.26% 0.32% 6.90% 6.12% 4.93% 5.85% 66.74% 65.4% 62.5% 59.8% 4.59% 4.60% 4.78% 5.34% 1.55% 1.48% 1.45% 1.46% 1.06% 1.43% 2.01% 2.55% 0.38% 0.39% 0.41% 0.44% 5.14% 5.10% 5.43% 6.06% 25.69% 26.13% 29.79% 30.23% [1] All figures and ratios are adjusted using Moody's standard adjustments [2] US GAAP Source: Moody's Financial Metrics Detailed Rating Considerations The FHLBanks' primary business is lending to member institutions in the form of advances, which are generally short-term and overcollateralized, minimizing the credit risk on these loans. The FHLBanks also purchase mortgage loans through either the Mortgage Partnership Finance (MPF) Program or the Mortgage Purchase Program (MPP). The FHLBanks also invest in securities, principally MBS, subject to an investment limit of three times regulatory capital without approval by the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Below are the detailed rating factors that influence the System's ratings and outlook. Profitability FHLBank System's low but consistent profitability (as measured by ROAA) reflects the primarily low risk profile of its asset base. Through FY 2017, the FHLBank of System s ROAA was 0.31%, down slightly from 2016, compared to a median of 1.0% for A-rated US Banks as of FY 2017. Capital Adequacy Each FHLBank is required by legislation to maintain minimum regulatory capital of 4% of its total assets. As of FY 2017, the capital ratio of the FHLBank System was 5.17%, up slightly from 5.14% in 2016. In Moody's view, capital levels reflect the low risk profile of the FHLBank System's asset base which is primarily comprised of advances to members. Asset Quality and Credit Risk Management Excluding the private label MBS portfolio, Moody's believes that the asset quality of the FHLBank System is exceptional. Advances, which represent about 66.3% of total assets, are over-collateralized and the FHLBanks have never incurred a loss on an advance in their history. The FHLBanks' collateral requirements on advances, and their priority lien status (for Member banks), support credit quality in the event a member defaults on its advances. Each FHLBank has sole credit approval power and establishes its own underwriting standards and eligible collateral within Federal Housing Finance Agency guidelines. Eligible collateral includes current first-lien residential mortgages (overwhelmingly single-family) or securities backed by such mortgages, Federal Agency securities, FHLBank deposits and other real estate-related assets approved by the relevant FHLBank's board of directors. Holdings of non-mbs instruments consist of high-quality liquid investments such as federal funds, resale agreements, US Government guaranteed debt and US Treasury securities. Potential losses on each of the respective FHLBanks' private-label RMBS portfolio represent the most significant credit risk to the FHLBanks, in Moody's view. 3

The FHLBanks conforming mortgage portfolio programs, MPF and MPP, provide members with an alternative to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac execution. The FHLBank System's mortgage portfolio represented 4.88% of total assets as of FY 2017 versus 4.59% as of FY 2016. The FHLBanks' mortgage assets are more susceptible to credit loss, and in particular, carry heightened operational complexity relative to the FHLBanks' core lending business. Credit risk performance of MPF and MPP programs has been very good to date exceeding that of similar programs of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. This excellent track record reflects the high quality of mortgage assets purchased and credit enhancements of the FHLBanks' MPF and MPP programs. Liquidity and Funding The FHLBanks' GSE status has provided it with consistent and stable access to the debt market. The FHLBanks internal sources of liquidity are modest. The Federal Housing Finance Agency, the regulator of the FHLBanks, requires each FHLBank to maintain sufficient liquidity, through short-term investments, in an amount at least equal to an FHLBank's anticipated cash outflows under two different scenarios. One scenario assumes that an FHLBank cannot access the capital markets for a period of between ten to twenty days, with initial guidance set at fifteen days and during that time members do not renew any maturing, prepaid or called advances. The second scenario assumes that an FHLBank cannot access the capital markets for a period of between three to seven days, with initial guidance set at five days, and during that period an FHLBank will automatically renew maturing and called advances for all members except very large members who are well-rated. All FHLBanks met the liquidity requirements as of FY 2017. Other A significant underpinning of the BCA is the joint and several nature of the FHLBanks' consolidated obligations. The financial strength of individual FHLBanks is very sound, and the joint and several liability contributes to the overall strength of the FHLBank System by narrowing the ratings differences among the individual FHLBanks that could exist were ratings to exclude the joint and several feature. As a result, the ratings of the weakest FHLBanks are increased, and the ratings of the strongest are lowered. This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on http://www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history. Ratings Exhibit 3 Category FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS Outlook Senior Unsecured ST Issuer Rating Moody's Rating Stable Aaa P-1 Source: Moody's Investors Service Recent Developments GSE reform has not progressed very far. To date, the reform is primarily focused on the roles of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. However, the FHLBanks are likely to be included in the reform, though the impact remains uncertain. Moody's will monitor GSE reform as it progresses, as well as its impact on the FHLBanks. 4

2018 Moody s Corporation, Moody s Investors Service, Inc., Moody s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, MOODY S ). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ( MIS ) ARE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody s publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody s Corporation ( MCO ), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading Investor Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy. Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY S affiliate, Moody s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to wholesale clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a wholesale client and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to retail clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ( MJKK ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody s SF Japan K.K. ( MSFJ ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ( NRSRO ). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. REPORT NUMBER 5 1123314

CLIENT SERVICES 6 Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454