Technology Transfers in Europe

Similar documents
Official Journal of the European Union

Changes to technology licensing in Europe: New competition law analysis will affect existing licences and new negotiations

INNOVATION FRIENDLY? YVES VAN COUTER 1

The EU competition rules on horizontal agreements

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

slaughter and may The EU Competition Rules on Horizontal Agreements

Distribution Contracts: Overview from a European Perspective

China Publishes the 2nd Version of the Anti-Monopoly Guidelines on the Abuse of Intellectual Property Rights

Draft. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /..

Exploiting Intellectual Property Rights: Key Attractions of Locating Operations in Ireland

EU competition law and supply and distribution agreements

Reform of the technology licensing rules

EU Commission Publishes New Regulations and Guidelines on the Application of EU Competition Law to Certain Categories of Commercial Contracts

Page 75 ANTITRUST GUIDELINES, 27 January ETSI Guidelines for Antitrust Compliance. Version adopted by Board#81 (27 January 2011)

Intellectual property rights intensive industries: contribution to economic performance and employment in Belgium

SAIC Releases Guidelines on the Enforcement of the Anti-Monopoly Law with Respect to IP Rights.

Questionnaire. On the patent system in Europe

EU proposals with a potential effect on the enforcement of IPR

Article 101 TFEU D R K A R O L I N A M O J Z E S O W I C Z E U A N T I T R U S T A N D M E R G E R S UJ

Transfer Pricing Forum

Last of Its Kind: The Review of the Technology Transfer Block Exemption Regulation, The Symposium on European Competition Law

2.2 Basic Aspects of Distributorship Agreements under UK Law and Court Practice

Draft R&D Block Exemption Regulation Draft Specialisation Block Exemption Regulation Draft Horizontal Guidelines. Observations of Van Bael & Bellis

Intellectual property rights in Luxembourg (IPR): tax exemption

THE TRIPS AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. Jayashree Watal

Patent Box 29 May 2012

PATSTRAT. Error! Unknown document property name. EN

Block Exemptions in EU Antitrust

Belgian R&D tax incentives

Knowledge Development Box Utilising it for maximum benefit

The Interface between IP Law and Competition Law

IP Exploitation. Get your ticket to innovation. Video-conference Academy of Sciences of Moldova, 4 September European IPR Helpdesk

Analysis of New Law UK CORPORATE TAX REFORM. Nikol Davies *

Making Intellectual Property Rights work at work. European Legal Framework. Prof. Marie-Christine Janssens Centre for IT & IP Law (CiTiP)

Transfer pricing and intangible planning

Consultation on modified UK patent box

OPC FOUNDATION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS POLICY VERSION APR 2018

Agenda. South African Tax and Exchange Control Implications of Export of Intellectual Property ( IP )

European Competition Law Compliance

TEI School - Houston. Intangible Property ( IP ) - Basics in IP Planning. May 3, 2017

The CFC consultation. - The latest step on the road to reform. Application of the Regime

Software and innovation deduction: Belgium is the place to be! 23 November 2017

How should companies react to the new 10 per cent. tax rate on patent profits?

Legal DELOITTE TAXLAB Peter Kits & Pim Gerritsen van der Hoop

United Kingdom Tax Alert

Summary Report. Question Q 156. International Exhaustion of Industrial Property Rights

COMMISSION NOTICE. Guidelines on the effect on trade concept contained in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (2004/C 101/07)

Innovation, Intellectual property and Financing

ANNEX II. SHORT FORM CO FOR THE NOTIFICATION OF A CONCENTRATION PURSUANT TO REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004

Brexit: what might change Intellectual Property

Tax incentives on Research and Development (R&D) 16 September 2014

Kyushu University: Rules on the Handling of Intellectual Property

New tax regime for intellectual property rights

Horizon 2020 SME Instrument Experts Briefing - Subcontracting Part 3

International Income Taxation Chapter 12: EXPLOITATION OF INTANGIBLES

PATENT BOX HOW TO REDUCE UK CORPORATION TAX

Intellectual Property Valuation and Innovation

Revenue from contracts with customers The standard is final A comprehensive look at the new revenue model

Benefits of Protecting Your IP - Patents as Business Tools

The Interaction between IP and Competition Law in Malaysia

Is it time for your country to consider the "patent box"?

The Knowledge Development Box ( KDB ) Public Consultation Paper. We are writing to respond to the above named document issued on 14 January 2015.

International Income Taxation Chapter 12: EXPLOITATION OF INTANGIBLES

Research & Development in Ireland March 2006

Inside the (Patent) Box: UK Government introduces beneficial tax regime on patent income

Tax Briefing No 09. This content is more than 5 years old. Where still relevant it has been incorporated. into a Tax and Duty Manual

PATSTRAT. Error! Unknown document property name. EN

Main changes to the EU Vertical Block Exemption Francesca R. Turitto

Are Patent Settlements Anti-Competitive? The EU Perspective

Intellectual Property Protection in China and Valuation of Intellectual Property. Alan J. Cox, Ph.D. NERA San Francisco

Legal Update. Patenting will significantly reduce tax burden for many UK companies. The Patent Box. January 2013

8. Technology Transfer: Negotiation Strategies. Rowan Joseph Patent Attorney, South Africa

IBM Agreement for Services Excluding Maintenance

Research and Development and Patents Tax Incentives

Anti-trust Law with an IP Protection Interface in China

International Tax Belgium Highlights 2018

Intellectual property and the Patent Box

Pre-Merger Notification Survey. INDIA Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A. Shroff & Co

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Pre-Merger Notification India

IBM Agreement for Services Acquired from an IBM Business Partner

The economics of Pay for Delay cases

whitelightconsulting UK Patent Box how to get the most* out of it (*or as close to that as we can get)

Supplement 7 - Analysis of the IPR policy of the NFC Forum. Analysis of the IPR policy of the NFC Forum

The European Commission s Draft Motor Vehicle Block Exemption and accompanying Guidelines. Observations of Van Bael & Bellis

Why invest in Ireland? At a glance

BUSINESS IN THE UK A ROUTE MAP

IMPORTANT ECONOMIC INCENTIVES Article by Liam Grimes, Director of Tax, KPMG, Moderator Professional 2 Advanced Taxation.

FESI COMMENTS ON BREXIT

The Controlled Foreign Company Regime in the EU CCTB Proposal

Fusion for Energy. Industrial Policy Paper. 2nd IP Associations Network Meeting. Barcelona 23 th September 2011

PART III. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SHEETS. Part III.4 b Provisional Supplementary Information Sheet on individual regional investment aid

Impact of recent U.S. tax legislation on Israeli Companies May 13, 2008 Doron Sadan, Tax Partner, PwC Israel Tel:

Lydian s Legal Update Webinar. 19 April Brussels

VIRGIN ISLANDS ECONOMIC SUBSTANCE (COMPANIES AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS) ACT, 2018 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

EC Competition Policy Overhaul for R&D Agreements Finally Freeing Joint Innovation from its EU Antitrust Straitjacket?

Cyprus Tax Update. Kyiv May 2018

FACT SHEET EU rules for disclosure of payments to governments by oil, gas and mining (extractive industry) and logging companies

EUROPIA Contribution on Draft Amendments to the Vertical Restraints Block Exemption Regulation & Guidelines

Transcription:

Technology Transfers in Europe The (revised) Balance between IP and Competition Law

AGENDA (1) The technology based industry challenges and solutions (2) Patents key to Technology Transfer (3) Technology Transfer (revised) EU Competition Law Regime 2

(1) The technology based industry - challenges and solutions Dynamic markets Increasing competitive pressure CHALLENGES Globalisation Speed of technological progress 3

(1) The technology based industry - challenges and solutions R&D cooperation Pool know-how Share risks SOLUTIONS Production cooperation - specialisation - outsourcing - subcontracting Share costs Cross Launch innova- fertilisation faster tion of ideas & experiments Technology transfers 4

(1) The technology based industry - challenges and solutions Technology transfer / intellectual property licensing R&D Results / technology IPRs - patents - utility models - designs - software Technology licensing Production of contract products 5

(2) Patents - key to Technology Transfer A patent an exclusive, in time limited, territorial right granted by the State (national or regional patent office) for an invention that is new that involves inventive step that is capable of industrial application made public / disclosed in an official journal 6

(2) Patents - key to Technology Transfer Invention? new and inventive solution a (improved) product / device a (improved) process to a technical problem in all fields of technology (EPC 2000) involves human ingenuity / inventiveness discovery 7

(2) Patents - key to Technology Transfer Rights granted? the right to exclude others from commercially using the invention, including: the making of the patented product / process the offering for sale, the selling, the importing, the internal use, the storing freedom to use by the owner regulatory clearance to market managing innovation implies / requires a good knowledge of the patent system 8

A. Technology Transfer - General Permission granted by the owner of the intellectual property right to another to use it On agreed terms and conditions: Defined purpose Defined territory Agreed period of time Licensing out / Licensing in 9

A. Technology Transfer - General Opportunities : substantial economic benefits Share risks Save costs Pool know-how Launch innovation faster Threats : anti-competitive effects Price fixing Output limitation Sharing of markets Sharing of customers Innovation (quality, variety) limitation 10

B. Article 101 TFEU Article 101(1) TFEU (prohibition) Prohibits agreements that appreciably prevent, restrict or distort competition within the EEA a contracting party s possibility to exploit its own technology e.g. an agreement limiting and/or to effectuate independent R&D void not enforceable agreement (art. 101(2) TFEU) fines up to 10 % worldwide turnover 11

B. Article 101 TFEU Article 101(3) TFEU (exemption) Exempted provided 4 cumulative conditions are met: improving production/distribution or promoting technical or economic progress fair share for consumers indispensable to attain the objectives no possibility to eliminate competition in respect of a substantial part of the products in question technical or economic benefits > limitations on competition 12

B. Article 101 TFEU Art. 101(3) TFEU (exemption) Presumption for agreements exempted by categories Other : ad hoc assessment of art. 101(3) TFEU Self assessment Helping means : De minimis notice (2001) no competition distortion if market share does not exceed : 10% (joint / competitors) 15% (each / non-competitors) Guidelines on the effect on inter-state trade (2004) Safe Harbours (Reg. 774/2004 TTBER, expired on 30 April 2014 / Reg. 316/2014 entered into force on May 1 st 2014) TTBER Guidelines (2014) 13

B. Article 101 TFEU - Assessment Summary Presumption: not caught by 101(1) TFEU 101(1) TFEU - TTBER exemption 101(1) TFEU not covered by TTBER 101(3) TFEU Safe harbour nr. 1 Safe harbour nr. 2 Individual assessment Safe harbour nr. 1 : - 4 or more technology substitutes or; below de minimis or no noticeable influence on interstate trade - no hardcore restriction Safe harbour nr. 2 : - under TTBER market share threshold, and - no hardcore restriction Individual assessment : - the market position of the parties, competitors and purchasers (market power) - market access thresholds - maturity of the market - other factors (e.g. length of the agreement, regulatory frame, etc.) 14

B. Article 101 TFEU TTBER Exemption (Safe Harbour N 2) 101(1) TFEU TTBER exemption the six steps assessment TTA? Relevant market? Competitors? Hardcore restrictions? Marketshares? Excluded restrictions? 1 2 3 4 5 6 15

Step 1 : TTA? An agreement between two contracting parties ~ Three or more parties Technology Transfer agreements (exc. patent pools) concerning the use of technology patent(s) (application)(s) design(s) and model(s) topographies of semi-conductor products copyright on software (exc. reproduction for resale as is ) supplementary protection certificates breeder certificates know-how a combination 16

Step 1 : TTA? For the production of intermediate or end-goods/services ~ Technology Transfer agreements relating to copyright, other than software copyright License agreements relating to trademarks (exc. directly related to production / sale of the contract products irrespective of value of the TM license) License agreements relating to neighbouring rights (e.g. rental and public performance rights) 17

Step 2 : Relevant market? Step 3 : Competitors? The relevant markets : Identification of relevant products and technologies Assessment of substitutability COMPE- TITORS? Yes No Actual or potential competitors on the relevant product market Even if potential competitors on the relevant technology market 18

(3) Technology Transfer - (revised) EU Competition Law Regime Step 4 : Hardcore restrictions Restriction on active sale in the territory or to a customer group reserved to another licensee (not competing with licensor upon entering licence agreement) Restriction of possibility for licensees to exploit their own technology 19

Step 5 : Market shares? Definition of the relevant market: Identification of relevant products and technologies Appreciation of substitutability 2004 TTBER (Guidelines) yes COMPETITORS? no no The combined market share on a relevant market > 20 %? Does the licensee own a technology which it only uses in-house and which is substitutable for the licensed technology? no yes yes no Within safe harbour Outside safe harbour The individual market share of each of the parties on a relevant market amounts to > 20 %? The individual market share of each of the parties on a relevant market amounts to > 30 %? no yes no yes Within safe harbour Outside safe harbour Within safe harbour Outside safe harbour Draft TTBER (Guidelines) Final revised TTBER 2014 (Guidelines) 20

Step 5 : Market shares? Preferential calculation on the basis of turnover data Among non-competitors : TTBER applies between 15% and 30% individual market share Among competitors : TTBER applies between 10% and 20% joint market share Excession during the agreement? 2 years respite 21

Yes Competitors? No Step 6 : Excluded restrictions? Yes Obligation of exclusive licence / transfer of severable and nonseverable improvements / new applications No Obligation of exclusive licence / transfer of severable and nonseverable improvements / new applications No Yes Yes No-challenge clause (reciprocal) = termination clause if any of the IPR held by the other party in the EU is challenged Exc.: right to terminate exclusive license when validity of IPR is challenged No-challenge clause (reciprocal) = termination clause if any of the IPR held by the other party in the EU is challenged Yes No No Yes Right to terminate agreement when one party challenges the validity of any IPR held by the other party in the EU («defensive termination») Right to terminate agreement when one party challenges the validity of any IPR held by the other party in the EU («defensive termination») Yes No No Draft TTBER Restriction exploitation by licensing of own technology Yes Restriction exploitation by licensing of own technology Yes Final Revised TTBER No No Restriction independant R&D by any of the contracting parties Yes Restriction independant R&D by any of the contracting parties Yes TTBER not applicable to clause concerned Individual assessment of clause concerned TTBER applicable to whole agreement Agreement CANN0T be exempted (hardcore restrictions) TTBER applicable to whole agreement TTBER not applicable to clause concerned Individual assessment of clause concerned 22

B. Article 101 TFEU / TTBER Assessment - Example Year 1 : Geographic and product market Total value market = 100 million Xeran Yplan A patent X : 10 MIO B patent Y : 5 MIO C : does not sell competing products / does not own and license competing technology D Patent Z : 3 MIO 23

Year 2 : Geographic and product market Total value market = 100 million Xeran Yplan A patent X : 10 MIO License of X Territorial protection License of X Prohibition of active sale by B on Belgian market Royalty computation on entire turnover of B C patent X : 2,5 MIO D Patent Y : 1 MIO Patent Z : 3 MIO B patent X : 2.5 MIO patent Y : 5 MIO Market share technology market : A = 0 % B = 0 % C = 0 % D = 0 % Market share product market : A = 10 % B = 5 % 24 C = 0 % D = 3 %

Year 3 : Geographic and product market Total value market = 100 million A patent X : 12,5 MIO License of X Territorial protection License of X Prohibition of active sale by B on Belgian market Royalty calculated on entire turnover of B B patent X : 10 MIO patent Y : 0 MIO C patent X : 5 MIO D Patent Y : 1 MIO Patent Z : 3 MIO Market share technology market : A = 15% B = 6% C = 0% D = 0% Market share product market : A = 10% B = 7,5% C = 2,5% D = 4% A+B = exempt during Year 4 and Year 5, provided no hard core restrictions; thereafter individual assessment

Questions? 26

Contact details : Yves Van Couter : yves.van.couter@loyensloeff.com Loyens & Loeff Woluwe Atrium Neerveldstraat 101-103 1200 Sint-Lambrechts-Woluwe (Brussels) Belgium Tel. : +32 2 773 23 43 Fax : +32 2 773 23 62 27