Hot Topics Affecting Housing Counseling August 5, 2015 1
Facilitators & Speakers Facilitator: Doug Dylla, Doug Dylla Consulting, Subcontractor to ICF International State of the Nation s Housing Report Dr. Chris Herbert, Managing Director, Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Final Rule Bryan Greene, General Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 2
State of the Nation s Housing 2015 Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University 3
Figure 1. The National Homeownership Rate Has Fallen Back to 1993 Levels 70 Homeownership Rate (Percent) 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Source: JCHS tabulations of US Census Bureau, Housing Vacancy Surveys. 4
Figure 2. But Are Well Below that Point for Most Age Groups 8 Change in Homeownership Rate (Percentage Points) 6 4 2 0-2 -4-6 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 Age of Household Head 25 34 35 44 45 54 55 64 65 and Over Source: JCHS tabulations of US Census Bureau, Housing Vacancy Surveys. 5
Figure 3. While Existing Home Prices Continued to Rise in 2014, Appreciation Slowed 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Indexed Home Price Year-over-year Change (Percent) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 20 16 12 8 4 0-4 -8-12 -16-20 Price Appreciation [Right scale] Existing Home Prices [Left scale] Source: JCHS tabulations of CoreLogic Case-Shiller Home Price Indexes. 6
Figure 4: Although the Number of Underwater Homeowners is Shrinking, Many Borrowers Still Have Little Equity 25 Households (Millions) 20 15 10 5 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 Borrowers Equity Levels: Negative Less than 5 Percent 5 20 Percent Note: Household counts are as of the fourth quarter of each year. Source: JCHS tabulations of CoreLogic data. 7
500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 Figure 5. Foreclosure Inventories Have Dropped Precipitously, Especially in the Hardest-Hit States Homes In Foreclosure (Thousands) 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Millions 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 US Total [Right Scale] California, Arizona & Nevada Michigan & Ohio Florida New York & New Jersey Source: JCHS tabulations of Mortgage Bankers Association, National Delinquency Surveys. 8
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Figure 6. Despite the Downturn, Housing Remains the Primary Form of Wealth for Low-Income and Minority Households Median Net Wealth (Thousands of 2013 dollars) Low-Income Households 2004 2007 2010 2013 Homeowner Housing Wealth Homeowner Non-Housing Wealth Renter Total Wealth 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Minority Households 2004 2007 2010 2013 Notes: Medians for housing and non-housing wealth are calculated independently do not sum to total. Non-housing wealth includes cash savings, savings in retirement accounts, stocks and bonds. Values are adjusted for inflation with the CPI-U for All Items. Low-income households are in the bottom income quartile based on equal fourths of all households. Source: JCHS tabulations of Federal Reserve Board, Surveys of Consumer Finances. 9
Figure 7. Growing Shares of Young Households Are Carrying Higher Levels of Student Loan Debt 40,000 2013 Dollars Percent 40 35,000 35 30,000 30 25,000 25 20,000 20 15,000 15 10,000 10 5,000 5 0 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 Average Outstanding Student Loan Debt [Left scale] Share of Households Aged 20 39 with Student Loan Debt [Right scale] 0 Note: Student debt is reported for entire household. Average outstanding student loan balances exclude households without debt. Source: JCHS tabulations of Federal Reserve Board, Surveys of Consumer Finances 10
Figure 8. Lending to Borrowers with Even Moderate Credit Scores Has Dropped Below Pre-Boom Levels 2.4 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.0-0.4-0.8-1.2 Number of Purchase Loans Originated (Millions) Under 660 660 720 Over 720 2001 2013 Change 2001 13 Credit Score Source: Urban Institute. 11
Figure 9. Household Growth Appears to be Picking Up 2.5 Annual Household Growth (Millions) 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Note: Estimates are four-quarter rolling average year-over-year growth. Source: JCHS tabulations of US Census Bureau, Housing Vacancy Surveys. 12
Figure 10. The Large, Diverse Millennial Generation Is Only Now Beginning to Form Households 90 Population in 2013 (Millions) 45 Households in 2013 (Millions) 80 40 70 35 60 30 50 25 40 20 30 15 20 10 10 5 0 Millennial Gen-X Baby Boom Generation 0 Millennial Gen-X Baby Boom Generation Black Hispanic Asian/Other White Note: White, black, and Asian/other households are non-hispanic. Hispanic households may be of any race. Sources: JCHS tabulations of US Census Bureau, 2013 American Community Survey. 13
Figure 11. Housing Cost Burdens Rise Sharply with Age for Those Still Paying off Mortgages Share of Households by Age Group (Percent) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 50 64 65 79 80 and Over 50 64 65 79 80 and Over 50 64 65 79 80 and Over Renters Owners with Mortgages Owners without Mortgages Moderately Burdened Severely Burdened Source: JCHS tabulations of US Census Bureau, 2012 American Community Survey. 14
Figure 12. Households 65 and Over Are Carrying Much More Mortgage Debt into Their Retirement Years Share of Owners with Mortgage Debt by Age Group (Percent) 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1992 1998 2004 2007 2010 Average Loan-to-Value Ratio for Owners with Mortgages by Age Group (Percent) 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 1992 1998 2004 2007 2010 Source: JCHS tabulations of Federal Reserve Board, Surveys of Consumer Finances. 15
Implications for Counseling Agencies Despite improvements in the overall economy, there s still a great need for financial education, coaching and counseling services due to: Rise in student debt loads Rise in housing cost burdens at all age levels Lack of emergency savings Rigid lending standards that have adversely affected borrowers credit scores below 720 16
Implications for Counseling Agencies With the lower homeownership rates, there is greater demand for rental education There will be a continuing need for postpurchase, HECM and foreclosure intervention counseling services given: More seniors carrying high mortgage debt loads Large percentage of homeowners with underwater mortgages 17
Implications for Counseling Agencies Targeted outreach is needed to highlight the critically important wealth effects of homeownership for: Millennials Lower-income and Minority households 18
Implications for Counseling Agencies Potential pent-up demand for homeownership education and counseling services from minority and low-income households with: Low interest rate environment Moderate home price increases Down payment assistance available from cities, counties and state housing finance agencies 19
20 Q and A
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Final Rule 21
AFFH Final Rule: Background Section 808(e)(5) of the Fair Housing Act 1968 Executive Order 11063 (1962) Executive Order 12892 (1994) Program regulations include fair housing requirements, including an AFFH certification. These all direct HUD and program participants to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing (AFFH) 22
AFFH Final Rule AFFH Final Rule is about fair housing planning The rule provide HUD grantees with clear guidelines and data to develop an Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) The rule requires community participation in the development of the AFH and links the AFH to subsequent planning process (e.g. the Con Plan and PHA Plan) 23
Key Features of Final Rule Clarifying existing fair housing obligations Publicly open data on fair housing A balanced approach to fair housing Expanding access to opportunity Valuing local data and knowledge Customized tools for local leaders Collaboration is encouraged Community voice A phased in approach Additional time for small grantees 24
AFH Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) Replaces the AI (Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing) Who conducts an AFH? Jurisdictions and Insular Areas required to submit Consolidated Plans within HUD s Office of Community Planning and Development (CPD), which includes CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA PHAs receiving funding under Section 8 or 9 of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937 25
Phased-in Approach Local Govts that received more than $500,000 CDBG in FY 2015 Con plan due Jan 1, 2017 AFH due April 6, 2016 State, insular areas, local govts that received Less than $500,000 CDBG in FY 2015 Con plan due Jan 1, 2018 AFH due April 6, 2017 26
Phased-in Approach (cont.) Qualified Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) Next fiscal year for 5-year PHA plan due Jan 1, 2019 AFH due April 6, 2018 See FAQ doc for additional dates for each category 27
Implications for Counseling Agencies Overall, housing counseling oversight agencies should follow the lead of the con plan entity and/or PHA Regional plans are strongly encouraged Intermediaries and Multi-state organizations (MSOs) State and/or local agencies responsible for the consolidated plan/pha plan may request input into AFH and AFFH activities should follow from assessment 28
Implications for Counseling Agencies State HFAs Depending upon the state, typically agency staff already involved in the consolidated plan; however, additional coordination within the agency may need to occur for input into AFH and for AFFH activities If not involved, the state agency responsible for the consolidated plan may request input into AFH and AFFH activities should follow from assessment 29
AFFH Resources HUD Exchange Website https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/affh AFFH Fact Sheet AFFH FAQs Executive Summary Ask a Question (AAQ) https://www.hudexchange.info/getassistance/my-question/ 30
31 Q and A