HHS Issues New Rules Regarding Medical Loss Ratio Requirements

Similar documents
Medical Loss Ratio Rules

ALERT: MEDICAL LOSS RATIO (MLR) STANDARDS June 6, 2012

HHS Releases Guidance on Medical Loss Ratio Requirement under PPACA

Medical Loss Ratio Rebate Requirements for Non-Federal Governmental Plans

A. The Affordable Care Act

UNDERSTANDING MEDICAL LOSS RATIO (MLR) REBATES

Treasury Decision 9491(II)(B) ... CLICK HERE to return to the home page. II. Overview of the Regulations

Federal and State Methodologies for Medical Loss Ratio Calculations

MLR REBATE CONSIDERATIONS PRIVATE PLANS

FAQS ABOUT AFFORDABLE CARE ACT IMPLEMENTATION (PART XV) April 29, 2013

HEALTH CARE REFORM: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE BROADER HEALTH INSURANCE MARKET

MY PLAN IS GETTING A REBATE FROM THE INSURER WHAT DO I DO WITH IT?

Grandfathered Health Plans Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)

Updated Summary of Health Care Reform for Employers Preparing for the Future Reissued October 14, 2010, to Include Implementation Guidance

Interim Final Rule Health Insurance Issuers Implementing Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) Requirements under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Medical Loss Ratio Requirements Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA): Issues for Congress

The Supreme Court Decision on Health Care Reform What If It Stays? What If It Goes? The Impact on Employer Group Health Plans.

LEGAL ALERT. June 28, 2010

Health Care Reform: Legislative Brief Important Effective Dates for Employers and Health Plans

Summary of the Impact of Health Care Reform on Employers

December 12, 2012 OVERVIEW OF THE TRANSITIONAL REINSURANCE PROGRAM

Grandfathered Health Plans Under PPACA (P.L )

ACA Sec Annual Fee Overview. Lawrence M. Brauer Ernst & Young LLP Washington, DC

Grandfathered Health Plans Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)

CMS Releases Proposed Rule on Medicare Advantage and Medicare Prescription Drug Plan MLR Requirements. Jacinta L. Alves

Health Care Reform Checklist

24 th Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference

ERISA Compliance: It s not an option, it s the law.

SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations that would modify the

Self-Compliance Tool for Part 7 of ERISA: Affordable Care Act Provisions

Health Care Reform at-a-glance

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2009: Health Insurance Market Reforms

The wait is over HHS releases final omnibus HIPAA privacy and security regulations

Issue Brief. Insurers Medical Loss Ratios and Quality Improvement Spending in Mark A. Hall and Michael J. McCue OVERVIEW

Re: State of Nevada s Request for Adjustment to Medical Loss Ratio Standard

CLICK HERE to return to the home page

Prepared by the CWA Research Department April

Important Effective Dates for Employers and Health Plans

Health Care Reform: What Small Employers Can Expect

Medical Loss Ratio Requirements Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA): Issues for Congress

SUMMARY: This final rule establishes requirements for student health insurance coverage

RE: Your Massachusetts State & Federal Medical Loss Ratio Rebate Important Information

Rulemaking implementing the Exchange provisions, summarized in a separate HPA document.

Employer Mandate: Employer Action Overview

Crosses the Finish Line. A presentation for the Manufacturer & Business Association

National Health Insurance Reform

Federal Requirements for Fully Insured and Self-Funded Plans

Annual Compliance Deadlines for Health Plans

ACA Violations Penalties and Excise Taxes

IRS Issues Proposed Regulations on Hybrid Plans

5GBenefits, LLC Your Health Care Reform Partner

Document Identifier CMS CMS Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) Annual Reporting Form

CMS Unveils 12-Step Reconciliation Process For Retiree Drug Subsidy (RDS)

EXPERT UPDATE. Compliance Headlines from Henderson Brothers:.

Religious Exemption to Women s Preventive Care Requirements

Affordable Care Act (ACA) Violations Penalties and Excise Taxes

Guide to Participant Notices

Health Care Reform Fees Overview

NFIB v. Kathleen Sebelius and its Impact on Employers: Healthcare Reform Revisited

Issue Eighty-One February 2014

Health Care and Health Insurance ADVISORY

Certified Pension Consultant (CPC) Modules Nonqualified Plans Module

The Secure Annuities for Employee (SAFE) Retirement Act of 2013

April 8, Fiduciary Rule Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24

DOWNLOAD OR READ : MEDICAL LOSS RATIO REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT ACA PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

Health Care Reform. Employer Action Overview

Makes permanent the provisions of EGTRRA that relate to retirement plans and IRAs. Makes the Saver s Credit permanent.

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Quick Reference Guide: Key Health Care Reform Requirements Affecting Plan Sponsors

Health Care Reform Fees Special Rules for HRAs

Guidance on Transitional Reinsurance Fees Brings Holiday Gifts for Some Employers and Coal for Others

October 1, 2010 NEW NONDISCRIMINATION REQUIREMENTS FOR INSURED GROUP HEALTH PLANS

Subtitle E Affordable Coverage Choices for All Americans

Re: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act (CMS 9968 P) AHIP Comments

MEMORANDUM TO CLIENTS

Andrew J. Hefty Crowell & Moring LLP 275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor San Francisco CA Direct (415)

HEALTH CARE REFORM: EMPLOYER ACTION OVERVIEW

Exhibit 1: MLR Examination Procedures Spreadsheet

H E A L T H C A R E R E F O R M T I M E L I N E

SUMMARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR FINAL RULE UNDER SECTION 408(b)(2) SERVICE PROVIDER FEE DISCLOSURE. February 6, 2012

Fiduciary Guide. Helping to protect your plan. MetLife Resources

Expatriate Plans in the Wake of the Expatriate Health Coverage Clarification Act

Proposed Regulations Address Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Dollar Limits, Rescissions & Patient Protections Under the Health Care Act

BENEFITS REQUIREMENTS

Premium Rate Review in New York State

Legal Requirements with ObamaCare

BP July 20, 2016

PRACTICE TRANSFORMATION. Moving Towards A Future of Team Based Care. Michael A. Kolber, PhD, MD

The Department of Labor Fee Transparency Initiatives: Part 2 - Mandatory Service Provider Fee Disclosures - Updated

Aon Hewitt Compliance Calendar Significant Compensation and Benefit Due Dates for 2015

Healthcare Reform Handbook

Health Reform Employer Perspective

Final Regulation on Participant-Level Fee Disclosures. By: Andrew Varady, Esq. Associate General Counsel, MetLife

IRS holds hearings on employer reporting requirements under health care reform

Health Care Reform Timeline Last Updated: March 12, 2014

Health Care Reform Overview

IRS Publishes Rules for Single-Employer Pension Plan Funding Relief

Employer Healthcare Reform Requirements in the Near-Term

2016 Compliance Checklist

NEW PROPOSED GUIDANCE ON EXPATRIATE HEALTH PLANS, EXCEPTED BENEFITS, ANNUAL AND LIFETIME DOLLAR LIMITS AND SHORT-DURATION MEDICAL INSURANCE

Transcription:

HHS Issues New Rules Regarding Medical Loss Ratio Requirements HHS issued both final regulations and interim final regulations regarding the application of the medical loss ratio (MLR) requirements under health care reform. The MLR provision requires issuers to provide rebates to plans and individuals purchasing insurance if the issuer does not spend a minimum percentage of the premium on medical claims. The regulations provide important relief for providing rebates in the group market, as well as extending special treatment of mini-med and expatriate policies. However, employers that receive MLR rebates will still have to make a significant compliance effort. Background Section 2718 of the Public Health Service Act, as added by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, requires that, beginning on January 1, 2011, health insurance issuers spend at least 80% of the premium dollars they receive from policies in the individual market or in the small group market on a combination of medical care claims and activities to improve health care quality. The parallel rule for the large group market (more than 50 employees) requires an 85% expenditure. Effectively, the medical loss ratio (MLR) provision limits the amount that insurers can spend on administrative expenses, overhead, profit, commissions, and other non-claim expenses to just 15% or 20% of the premium. Satisfaction of the MLR requirements is determined for the insurer separately in each state where the insurer issues policies and separately for each of three market segments in the state: individual, small group, and large group. Since satisfying the MLR requirements is based on an insurer s entire book of business issued in a state, and not on the MLR of an employer-specific plan, any large employer with an insured plan could receive a rebate and would then have to satisfy the distribution and notice requirements for rebates. An insurer must provide rebates to policyholders and enrollees if the insurer fails to meet the MLR standards in a state for the prior year. Insurance companies will have to pay rebates for 2011 by August 2012. In December 2010, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued interim final regulations on the MLR requirements. (See our January 24, 2011 For Your Information.) On

December 7, 2011, HHS issued final regulations on the MLR requirements, as well as interim final regulations on certain issues for non-federal governmental plans. The final regulations are very similar to the December 2010 interim final regulations, but with several important changes for group plans. Rebates to Enrollees in the Group Market Under the December 2010 interim final regulations for the large and small group markets, the insurer had to provide the rebate directly to the policyholder and the subscribers (enrollees) in amounts proportionate to the amount of premium each paid. The guidance allowed the insurer to enter into an agreement with the group policyholder to distribute the rebates on behalf of the insurer, but the insurer still retained responsibility. Comments provided to HHS on the December 2010 interim final regulations included concerns about the significant administrative burden this process would put on insurers to distribute the funds to subscribers. Concerns were also raised that rebate amounts paid directly to subscribers would be taxable to subscribers in many cases. The final regulations help address the subscriber taxation and insurer administration concerns in the group markets by allowing the insurer to pay the rebate directly to the policyholder and the policyholder to use the rebates for the benefit of subscribers. The final regulations discuss the distribution of rebates paid to three different types of group health plan policyholders: Policyholders that sponsor plans subject to the Employee Retirement income Security Act (ERISA). In the preamble to the final regulations, HHS notes that rebates paid in connection with plans subject to ERISA may be considered plan assets that must be handled in accordance with ERISA and cites Department of Labor Technical Release 2011-04, issued contemporaneously with the final regulations. The Technical Release notes that the policyholder will have to determine the extent to which any rebates are considered plan assets and that this will depend on a number of factors, including the terms of the governing plan documents. To the extent the rebates are considered plan assets, the policyholder must apply or expend such assets consistent with its fiduciary responsibilities under ERISA. The Technical Release also provides that the Department will not assert a violation of ERISA s trust requirement against plans receiving rebates that do not otherwise maintain a trust, as long as the rebate is used to pay premiums or refunds within three months of receipt of the rebate as permitted by ERISA. Alternatively, the trust requirement may be avoided if the plan sponsor directs the insurer to apply the rebate against future participant contributions or benefit enhancements. 2

COMPLIANCE ALERT: Plan sponsors should review their plan documents to confirm that the language will support a claim that not all of the rebate should be considered a plan asset and instead belongs to the employer. Policyholders that are non-federal governmental group health plans. Because there is no similar framework for plans not subject to ERISA, HHS also issued interim final regulations that set out rules for non-federal governmental plans. These rules require the policyholder to use the amount of the rebate that is proportionate to the total amount of premium contributed by subscribers to reduce the portion of premiums charged in subsequent policy years to subscribers who were covered under the group health plan at the time the rebate is received. The policyholder can either limit the premium reduction to subscribers who were covered under the option generating the rebate or make a cash refund to those individuals. The policyholder may determine whether to evenly divide the rebate among all subscribers, to divide it based on each subscriber s actual contributions, or to apportion it on any other reasonable basis. The preamble to the interim final regulations provides an example in which the policyholder receives $20,000 in rebates from the insurer. If the subscribers paid in the aggregate 40% of the total premium, then the policyholder must use 40% of the rebates, or $8,000, for the benefit of subscribers. HHS has recognized the administrative difficulty that policyholders would have in tracking subscribers who were enrolled in the year in which the rebate was calculated. The requirement that rebates be used in connection with subscribers enrolled in the plan at the time the rebates are received is a welcome development for employers. Plans that are not ERISA or government plans. The final regulations provide that an insurer can pay the rebate to the policyholder only if the policyholder agrees in writing that the rebate will be paid to subscribers in the same manner as required for non-federal governmental plans. If no agreement is obtained, the insurer must pay the full amount of the rebate, including the amount based on the premium paid by the policyholder, to subscribers in equal amounts. The regulations also provide that if a plan entitled to a rebate was terminated and the issuer cannot locate the policyholder, the issuer must distribute the full amount of the rebate directly to the subscribers of the plan in equal amounts. 3

COMPLIANCE ALERT: Employers with insured plans must comply with the MLR requirements for any rebates received in 2012 or later years, including the distribution and communication requirements. Notice Requirements The final regulations require an issuer that is paying a rebate to provide a notice to both the policyholder receiving the rebate and to the affected subscribers. The notice must contain information regarding the amount of the rebate, the amount owed to enrollees, and other prescribed information. The Secretary of HHS will prescribe the form of the notice. Mini-med Policies The December 2010 interim final regulations effectively allowed large group mini-med plans to have a 42.5% MLR in 2011 (40% for individual and small group plans). Mini-med plans are defined by the regulations as plans with annual limits of $250,000 or below. The final regulations phase out this special treatment over the next three years, effectively allowing an MLR for large group plans of 48.6% in 2012 and 56.7% in 2013. It is anticipated that mini-med plans will no longer be allowed as of 2014 due to the prohibition under health care reform of annual and lifetime dollar limits. However, to satisfy the MLR requirements for 2012 and 2013, insurers may have to reduce administrative expenses or raise benefit levels to comply with the MLR requirements. This could result in employers needing to modify their benefit strategy for mini-med plans sooner than 2014. Expatriate Policies The December 2010 interim final regulations allowed large group expatriate plans to have an MLR of 42.5% in 2011 (40% for individual and small group plans). The final regulations continue this special treatment in 2012 and future years. 4

Conclusion Employers with insured health programs will need to familiarize themselves with these MLR requirements in case rebates are received from insurers. Employers will want to coordinate with the insurer the possibility of receiving any rebates and quickly establish a process for sharing any rebates with employees. Buck s consultants are available to discuss these requirements in more detail and to assist in developing a compliance strategy. Buck Can Help Review plan asset issues arising in connection with rebates received by ERISA plans Revise plan document language to possibly limit treatment of a rebate as a plan asset Ensure compliance with the rebate distribution and communication requirements Develop a benefit strategy as mini-med plans are phased out under health care reform This FYI is intended to provide general information. It does not offer legal advice or purport to treat all the issues surrounding any one topic. 2011 Buck Consultants, L.L.C. All Rights Reserved 5