Resettlement Planning Document.

Resettlement Planning Document. Document: Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan Document Stage: Final Project Number: 40190 June 2012 GMS - Flood and Drought Risk Management and Mitigation Project (FDRMMP) LAO: Flood Protection and Drought Mitigation Project in Vientiane Capital Prepared by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) of Lao People s Democratic Republic for Asian Development Bank The Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB s Board of Directors, Management, or Staff and may be preliminary in nature.

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATION ADB : Asian Development Bank AHs : Affected Households AP : Affected Person CPMU : Central Project Management Unit DAFO : Department of Agriculture and Forestry Office DMH : Department of Meteorology and Hydrology DMS : Detailed Measurement Survey DOI : Department of Investment DPC : District People s Committee EA : Executing Agency EDPs : Economically Displaced Persons EMA : External Monitoring Agent FDRMMP : Flood and Drought Mitigation and Management Project (or the Project) FGDs : Focus Group Discussions GMS : Greater Mekong Sub-region GoL : Government of Lao PDR GRC : Grievance Redress Committee HHs : Household Heads IA : Implementing Agency IEC : Information Education Campaign IPP : Indigenous Peoples Plan IOL : Inventory of Losses kg : kilogram LAK : Lao Kip LARF : Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework LMB : Lower Mekong River Basin lm : lineal meter LURCs : Land Use Right Certificates MAF : Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry NGO : n-government Organization para. : Paragraph PCU : Project Coordination Unit PDPs : Physically Displaced Persons PIB : Project Information Booklet PMCs : Project Management Consultants PPMU : Provincial Project Management Unit Project : Flood and Drought Mitigation and Management Project RCS : Replacement Cost Survey RETA : Regional Technical Assistance ROW : Right-of Way RP : Resettlement Plan SES : Socioeconomic Survey SDS : Social Development Specialist SPS : Safeguard Policy Statement WREA : Water Resources and Environment Administration

Dollar means US Dollar $ 1.00 = 8,000 LAK LAK 8,000 = $0.0001 In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... i I. INTRODUCTION... 1 A. Project Rationale... 1 B. Project Description... 2 C. Summery of Project Impacts... 3 D. Alternatives Considered to Avoid or Minimize Resettlement... 3 E. Rationale for the Resettlement Plan... 4 II. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT... 4 A. Project Coverage... 4 C. Loss of Houses and/or Structures... 7 D. Loss of Crops and Trees... 8 E. Disruption of Businesses... 8 III. SOCIOECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE... 9 A. Socio-Economic Profile of Subproject Area... 9 B. Socio-Economic Profile of Affected People... 10 IV. POLICY FRAMEWORK AND ENTITLEMENTS... 12 A. Policy Framework... 12 B. Eligibility for Compensation and Other Assistance... 13 C. Entitlement Matrix... 14 V. COMPENSATION, RELOCATION AND REHABILITATION ARRANGEMENTS... 19 A. Compensation Arrangements... 19 B. Relocation Strategies... 22 C. Income Restoration Program and Assistance to Vulnerable Groups... 22 D. Due Diligence during the DMS... 23 VI. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION AND GRIEVANCE REDRESS... 24 A. Consultation and Participation... 24 B. Information Disclosure... 30 C. Grievance Redress... 31 VII. RESETTLEMENT COSTS... 32 VIII. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS... 34 A. Implementation Structure... 34 B. Compensation Payment and Procedures... 36 IX. MONITORING... 37 A. Internal Monitoring... 37 B. External Monitoring and Evaluation... 38 X. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE... 38 Annex 1: Displaced Persons with 10% or more Impacts on their Lands... 41 Annex 2: COMPENSATION BY IMPACT AND AFFECTED APs... 43 Annex 3: Minutes of Public Consultations... 72 Annex 4: Project Information Booklet Presented During 2012 Consultations... 79 Annex 5: Replacement Cost Survey Report (2010)... 83 Annex 6: Sample Voluntary Contribution Consent Form... 92

LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Project Covered Areas in Vientiane... 5 Table 2. Project Impact on Households... 5 Table 3. Project Impact on Private and Government Establishments... 6 Table 4. Project Impact on Common/Public Property... 6 Table 5. Gender Distribution of Household Members (%)... 9 Table 6. Occupations of Household Heads (%)... 10 Table 7. Status of AHs Monthly Incomes vs. Monthly Expenses... 11 Table 8. Vulnerable HHs in Project Sites... 11 Table 9. Entitlement Matrix... 14 Table 10. Highlights of Public Consultations... 24 Table 11. Consultation and Participation Plan for RP Updating... 28 Table 12. Consultation and Participation Plan during RP Implementation... 29 Table 13. Summary of RP Budget... 33 Table 14. Internal Monitoring Indicators... 37

DEFINITION OF TERMS Affected person (AP) Compensation Cut-off Date Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS) Displaced Persons Economically Displaced Person Entitlement - Means any person or persons, household, firm, private or public institution that, on account of changes resulting from the Project, will have its (i) standard of living adversely affected; (ii) right, title or interest in any house, land (including residential, commercial, agricultural, forest, salt mining and/or grazing land), water resources or any other moveable or fixed assets acquired, possessed, restricted or otherwise adversely affected, in full or in part, permanently or temporarily; and/or (iii) business, occupation, place of work or residence or habitat adversely affected, with or without displacement. In the case of a household, the term AP includes all members residing under one roof and operating as a single economic unit, who are adversely affected by the project or any of its components. - Refers to any payment in cash or in kind of the replacement cost of the acquired assets. The completion date of the census of project-displaced persons is usually considered the cut-off date. A cut-off date is normally established by the borrower government procedures that establish the eligibility for receiving compensation and resettlement assistance by the project displaced persons. In the absence of such procedures, the borrower/client will establish a cut-off date for eligibility. - With the aid of the approved detailed engineering design, this activity involves the finalization and/or validation of the results of the inventory of losses (IOL), severity of impacts, and list of APs earlier done during RP preparation. The final cost of resettlement can be determined following completion of the DMS. - In the context of involuntary resettlement, the persons, entity organizations who are physically displaced (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter) and/or economically displaced (loss of land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihoods) as a result of (i) involuntary acquisition of land, and or (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to common property resources, legally designated parks and protected areas. - Refers to any person who will lose income or sources of livelihood whether they are physically displaced, or not. - Is a range of measures comprising compensation in cash or in kind, income restoration, transfer assistance, income substitution, and relocation which are due to DPs, depending on the nature of their losses, to restore their economic and social base.

Grievance Procedures Household Income Restoration Meaningful Consultation Physically Displaced Person Protection Corridor Rehabilitation Relocation Replacement Cost - Is the process established under law, local regulations, or administrative decisions to enable DPs to redress issues on property acquisition, compensation and other resettlement aspects. - Means all persons living together as a single social unit. They are identified in a census being an instrument of their recognition and legitimacy to receive compensation, rehabilitation and assistance under the Project. - Is the reestablishment of income sources and livelihoods of DPs to their pre-project levels. - Is a process that: (i) begins early in the Project preparation stage and is carried out on an ongoing basis throughout the project cycle; (ii) provides timely disclosure of relevant and adequate information that is understandable and readily accessible to affected people; (iii) is undertaken in an atmosphere free of intimidation or coercion; (iv) is gender inclusive and responsive, and tailored to the needs of disadvantaged and vulnerable groups; and (v) enables the incorporation of all relevant views of affected people and other stakeholders into decision making, such as project design, mitigation measures, the sharing of development benefits and opportunities, and implementation issues. - Refers to any person whose house and/or structure will be relocated from his/her pre-project place of residence. - It is the area that is impacted by the subproject civil works or by the need to rehabilitate the waterways, creek and irrigation facility for use in flood and drought mitigation and management. In the context of involuntary resettlement, it is the area covered by the 50-meter width from the side of the dike embankment where the displaced persons have been identified who are eligible to receive compensation based on the cut-off date established by the Project implementing agency. - Means assistance provided to severely affected DPs losing 10% or more of productive assets (i.e. farmland, vegetable garden, etc.), incomes, employment or sources of livelihood such as shops and place of work have to be reconstructed and/or relocated. The livelihood support may be given in cash or in kind or employment during Project construction to improve or at least achieve full restoration of living standards to pre-project levels. - Is the physical shifting of AP from his/her pre-project place of residence and/or business. - The value determined to be fair compensation for land based on its productive potential, the replacement cost of houses and structures (current fair market price of construction materials and labor without

provision for deduction of depreciation or remaining value of salvageable construction materials), and the market prices of crops, trees, and other commodities. Resettlement Resettlement Plan Severely Affected Person Vulnerable Group - All measures taken to mitigate any and all adverse impacts of the Project on AP s property and/or livelihood, including compensation, relocation (where relevant), and rehabilitation. - Is the planning document that describes the activities to be done in addressing the direct social and economic impacts associated with involuntary taking of land. - Is a person who will: (i) lose 10% or more of their productive assets, such as agriculture/aquaculture landholding, and/or (ii) physically displaced from housing; and/or (iii) economically displace losing 10% or more of total income sources due to the Project. - Are distinct group of people who might suffer disproportionately or faced the risk of being further marginalized by the effects of resettlement and specifically include: (i) households headed by women, the elderly or disabled; (ii) households living below the poverty line; (iii) the landless; (iv) children without means of support; and (iv) indigenous peoples and/or ethnic minorities.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. The construction of the flood dike-cum-road covers about 30.4km long of the existing flood dike-cum-road along the Mekong River (Figure 3). Rehabilitation of the flood embankment along the Mekong River will require land acquisition. The MAF together with DOW has prepared this Resettlement Plan (RP) as an expression of its commitment that it will comply with the social safeguards policies of ADB during subproject implementation. 2. A Social Survey Team comprised of six professional nationals updated the PPTA data of 2012 and conducted the series of on ground consultations parallel to national consultations and the conduct of interviews and actual measurements of alignment finalized at 8 meters from centerline of the embankment. Participation of both EA and IA along with local government officials enabled a more accurate collection of data. 3. This update likewise incorporates recent GOL policy statements, i.e., the issuance of Decree 152 on Land Administration and pricing and extrapolations of poverty line with other international sources in order to update estimates inasmuch as only 2005 Lao Census data was made available. 4. This RP provides the guidelines and procedures in the compensation and relocation of people or persons who shall be displaced due to the subproject, consistent with the existing legal framework in Lao PDR and that of 2009 Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) as well as the relevant cross-cutting policy themes of ADB. 5. Given the length of the embankment, the impacts of land acquisition consist of the following impacts in 14 villages located in four communes of Hadxayfong District in Vientiane Capital: (i) of a total 696,867.70 m2 landholdings, 26,898.32 m2 will be affected by land acquisition; (ii) there will be a total of 217 affected households (AHs), 48 of whom stand to lose 10% or more of their productive lands and/or assets and are thus considered severely affected; (iii) there are 13 AHs who may face relocation although negotiations are now in place with local government leaders regarding the availability of land for land compensation within the village; (iv) Of the 217 AHs, 95 AHs are considered vulnerable; (v) 12 public institutions/common property resources will be affected; (vi) 10 establishments (private companies/government) will be affected; (vii) disruption of business of 65 commercial establishments; and, (viii) removal of 519 trees. 6. The legal and policy framework for compensation, resettlement and rehabilitation in this RP is defined by the relevant laws and regulations of the GoL, and the Safeguard Requirements 2 of the 2009 Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) and the relevant crosscutting policy themes of ADB. 7. The recent changes in the Government of Lao PDR legislation related to compensation and resettlement represents a significant increased alignment of the government s policies and ADB s safeguards requirements with regard to the rights of citizens when their livelihoods, possessions and society are affected by development projects. 8. Both Lao Law and ADB policies entitle non-titled APs to compensation for affected assets at replacement cost and other assistance so that they are not made worse off due to the Project. Decree 192/PM goes beyond ADB s policy and provides APs living in rural or remote areas, or APs in urban areas who do not have proof of land-use rights and who have no other land in other places, compensation for their assets and other assistance. Should APs be found to be non-titled and required to relocate, the Project will ensure they are

ii provided replacement land at no cost to the APs, or cash assistance to purchase replacement land within the village. 9. All affected households who are identified in the project-impacted areas on the cut-off date will be entitled to compensation for their affected assets, and rehabilitation measures sufficient to assist them to improve or at least maintain their pre-project living standards, income-earning capacity and production levels. The cut-off date is defined as the final day of the census of potentially affected households. Those who settle in the subproject area after the cut-off date will not be entitled to compensation or any other assistance. 10. All APs whose personal information were recorded in the IOL/SES are eligible for compensation and assistance. The list of APs was signed and validated by the 14 village chiefs and provided the EA/IA this May 2012. 11. The project entitlements developed and presented in the Entitlement Matrix (Table 9) are based on the coverage of impacts. Entitlements adopted are consistent with the Prime Minister s Decree. 192/PM (2005), Regulation. 2432/STEA-PMO (2005) and Regulation. 699/PMO, WREA (March 2010), and consistent with ADB s SPS (2009) Safeguard Requirement 2 on Involuntary Settlement. The entitlements prescribed in this document may be enhanced and/or improved, as necessary, in the updated version of this RP. Compensation arrangements have been developed in line with the different losses and AP types making income restoration initiatives to be built in the entitlement framework specifically with safeguards on identified vulnerable groups like women and the elderly as well as those falling below a defined poverty line. 12. This RP is a product of current and constant validation of the IOL, RCS, and SES conducted by the PPTA from 2010-2011. Participatory approaches have been realized through the involvement of the EA/IA and local governments along with village households/stakeholder groups. As such, measures ensuring information s disclosure, consultation processes and grievance redress build on existing and operable mechanisms currently practiced by the GOL and the project sites in particular, at the village level. 13. The estimated cost for RP implementation is estimated at LAK 21,564,130,628.70 or about $ 2,695,516.33. Resettlement costs shall be added to the Project loan from ADB. The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) will be the executing agency. In Lao PDR, MAF will delegate responsibility for the overall management and coordination to the Department of Irrigation (DOI) which will establish a National Project Coordination Office led by a national project coordinator in Vientiane. The implementing agencies will be Provincial Agricultural and Forestry Office, the Department of Waterways under the Department of Public Works and Transport, both of Vientiane Capital, and the Department of Meteorology and Hydrology for the National Early Warning Center in Vientiane. 14. Resettlement institutional structures will have to be formed/activated requiring intensive capacity building to ensure efficient and just implementation of the RP. 15. A monitoring system has been designed, highlighting the need for both internal and external bodies. 16. The results of the IOL, the budget and other information presented in this RP will be validated and finalized during updating of the RP through the conduct of a detailed measurement survey (DMS) following concurrence by GoL and ADB with this RP. Implementation of the RP will commence after NPCO receives concurrence from ADB. 17. The MAF/DOI through its NPCO, will not issue a notice-of-possession of site until the head of district resettlement committee confirms in writing that (i) payment has been fully disbursed to the affected persons and rehabilitation measures are in place as set out in the

RP agreed between MAF/DOI and ADB; (ii) displaced persons are already compensated; and (iii) the area is free from any encumbrances. 18. An indicative schedule of activities is prepared to guide RP implementation.

I. INTRODUCTION 1. The regional project 1 to which this subproject belongs intends to support the Governments of Lao PDR and Viet Nam to undertake structural and non-structural measures to prepare for and manage disaster risks linked to floods and droughts. Project interventions will (i) enhance regional data, information and knowledge base for the management of floods and droughts; (ii) upgrade or develop water management infrastructure and (iii) prepare communities to manage disasters such as flood and drought and adapt to climate change. Improved drought management and irrigation water structures will benefit farmers on approximately 100,000 ha of agricultural lands around 600,000 people will benefit from improved flood management. 2. Specific to Lao PDR, the project impact will be reduced losses resulting from floods and droughts. The project outcome will be improved capacities and preparedness to manage and mitigate the impacts of flood and drought events. As such, the project will have four key outputs (i) enhanced regional data, information and knowledge base for the management of floods and droughts; (ii) upgraded water management infrastructure; (iii) enhanced capacity for CBDRM; and (iv) effective project implementation. A. Project Rationale 3. Vientiane Capital is located in the floodplain of the Mekong River (Figure 1). Different development partners are assisting the Government of Lao PDR in constructing flood embankments and riverbank protection along the Mekong River to protect the capital and adjacent areas from recurrent flood events. The 12.2km long flood embankment along the Mekong River from Kaoliao to KM 3 is under construction with the assistance of Economic Development Cooperation Fund (EDCF) of Korea (Figure 2). The Chinese Government is planning to assist the flood embankment construction along the Mekong River downstream of the Korean project up to the Lao Star Satellite Station area. This subproject proposed for ADB funding consists of a 30.4km long flood embankment construction along the Mekong River between Lao Star Satellite Station and Mak Hiao River. Figure 1: Location of the Subproject 1 The Asian Development Bank (ADB) provided project preparatory technical assistance. ADB. 2008. Technical Assistance to the Kingdom of Cambodia, Lao People s Democratic Republic, Kingdom of Thailand and Socialist Republic of Viet Nam for Preparing the Greater Mekong Subregion Flood and Drought Risk Management and Mitigation Project. Manila.

2 Figure 2: On-going, Planned and Proposed Flood Embankment Projects 4. The Ministry of Public Works and Transport (MPWT) has prepared a master plan for industrial and urban development in Vientiane capital (2010-2020) and the proposed industrial and urban development areas under the master plan fall covers the project area. 5. The objectives of the project are: (i) (ii) To protect agricultural, industrial, rural and urban areas, and infrastructures from up to a 100-year return period flood by constructing flood embankment along the Mekong River, and To provide transportation facilities by using flood embankment as road for easy access to villages and for transporting agricultural products of villages to markets. 6. The above objectives of the project will thereby contribute to: (i) (ii) (iii) Promote internal trade for improving the livelihood of people; Assist in the implementation of the master plan on industrial and urban development in Vientiane Capital (2010-20) prepared by Ministry of Public Works and Transport (MPWT) by providing necessary flood protection measures; and To assist in the governments national water resources policy and strategy for river basin management. B. Project Description 7. The construction of the flood dike-cum-road covers about 30.4km long of the existing flood dike-cum-road along the Mekong River (Figure 3). The old existing dike along the Mekong River between 0+000 KM and 4+000 KM section of proposed embankment (section between Lao Star Satellite Station and ng Khai Friendship Bridge) will be rehabilitated (or newly constructed where old dike is not complete) to make it usable for flood dike-cum-road purpose. One lane (4.0m wide) dirt road will be constructed over the flood dike in this section. However, in the section between 4+000 KM and 30+400 KM of proposed embankment (section between ng Khai Friendship Bridge and Mak Hiao River), the height of the existing dirt road along the Mekong River will be raised to make it usable for flood dike-cum-road purposes. In the embankment section between 4+000 KM and 30+400 KM, two lane (8.0m wide) asphalt road will constructed over the flood dike. The elevation of top level of flood dike will be: 168.75m (0+000 KM), 168.39m (4+000 KM), 168.30m (5+000 KM), 167.85m (10+000 KM), 167.39m (15+000 KM), 166.94m (20+000 KM), 166.49 (25+000 KM) and 166.03m (30+000 KM). The

3 elevations of top level of flood dike are designed considering the 100-year return period flood levels of the Mekong River at Vientiane and ng Khai stations and considering 0.5m free board. C. Summery of Project Impacts Figure 3: General Layout Map of the Subproject 8. Given the length of the embankment, the impacts of land acquisition consist of the following impacts in 14 villages located in four communes of Hadxayfong District in Vientiane Capital: (i) of a total 696,867.70 m2 landholdings, 26,898.32 m2 will be affected by land acquisition; (ii) there will be a total of 217 affected households (AHs), 48 of whom stand to lose 10% or more of their productive lands and/or assets and are thus considered severely affected; (iii) there are 13 AHs who may face relocation although negotiations are now in place with local government leaders regarding the availability of land for land compensation within the village; (iv) Of the 217 AHs, 95 AHs are considered vulnerable; (v) 12 public institutions/common property resources will be affected; (vi) 10 establishments (private companies/government) will be affected; (vii) disruption of business of 65 commercial establishments; and, (viii) removal of 519 trees. D. Alternatives Considered to Avoid or Minimize Resettlement 9. An earlier assessment was conducted in 2010-2011 by a Project Preparation Technical Assistance (PPTA) Team and were technically guided to use the following ROW easement of the embankment as measured from the dirt road s centerline: (i) 10.5 meters (m) from km 0+000 to 4+000, and (ii) 12.5 m from km 4+000 to 30+400. Impacts were determined to be far reaching including those on religious temples. The EA thus decided to minimize impacts by decreasing easement to 8 meters from centerline all throughout the embankment stretch. 10. Temporary or permanent displacement will further be minimized through constant coordination and consultations between the National Project Coordinating Office and the DOW as the IA on one side, and the local government units: district, communes, village leaderships, local stakeholders and Project-affected persons on the other side. Prior to land acquisition and clearing of the embankment right-of-way (ROWs), the representatives from project management

4 shall observe and implement the following measures in order to avoid or minimize the negative impacts of involuntary resettlement: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) Engage active participation of local governments and regularly conduct public consultations/information dissemination, whichever is appropriate, with district representatives, communes and village leaders. Assess the lands outside the ROW easements of the 30.4 km dike-cum-road in the Mekong River and ensure project-affected households (AHH) can be moved in situ in order to minimize the number of persons for relocation to resettlement site/s. With due consideration to the various activities of the people in Mekong River, the civil works contractor will survey the area on where to establish alternative access to the bank so that civil works will not disrupt the peoples daily activities along the river when the subproject is implemented. Project management will closely coordinate with the civil works contractor on the section-by-section schedule of implementing the civil works in order for AHHs to plan resettlement schedules, including procedures for their timely and orderly clearing of the ROW. AHHs will be given at least 3 months advance notice prior to any project activity within their areas. E. Rationale for the Resettlement Plan 11. Rehabilitation of the 30.4-km-long flood embankment along the Mekong River will require land acquisition. The MAF together with DOW has prepared this Resettlement Plan (RP) as an expression of its commitment that it will comply with the social safeguards policies of ADB during subproject implementation. 12. While a Project Preparation Techical Assistance conducted social surveys from 2010 2011, updates for the RP have been made possible in tandem with GOL initiatives to further finalize design conceptalization. A Social Survey Team comprised of six professional nationals conducted the series of on ground consultations parallel to national consultations and the conduct of interviews and actual measurements of alignment finalized at 8 meters from centerline of the embankment. Participation of both EA and IA along with local government officials enabled a more accurate collection of data. 13. This update likewise incorporates recent GOL policy statements, i.e., the issuance of Dceree 152 on Land Administraiton and pricing and extrapolations of poverty line with other international sources in order to update estimates inasmuch as only 2005 Lao Census data was made available. 14. This RP provides the guidelines and procedures in the compensation and relocation of people or persons who shall be displaced due to the subproject, consistent with SPS. The provisions in this RP are based on the existing legal framework in Lao PDR and that of the 2009 Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) as well as the relevant cross-cutting policy themes of ADB. II. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT A. Project Coverage 15. The project traverses 14 villages and four communes under the jurisdiction of Hadxayfong district in Vientiane Province (Table 1). The table further shows the ratio of AHHs compared to the total population per affected village.

5 Village Table 1. Project Covered Areas in Vientiane Total Number of HHs* Number of Percent District Commune Village AHHs** Hadxayfong 1. Salakhamh 491 18 3.7% i. ngheo 491 18 3.7% 2. Thadeua 1709 52 3.0% ii. Dongphosy 445 2 0.4% iii. Thamuang 380 10 2.6% iv. Pava 178 20 11.2% v. Thadeua 370 6 1.6% vi. Thanaleng 316 10 3.2% vii. Thintom 336 4 1.2% 3. Thapha 813 44 5.4% viii. Thapha 297 16 5.4% ix. Thinthane 141 20 14.2% x. Parkpeng 59 8 13.6% 4. Simmano 1033 104 10.1% xi. Khouydeng 345 20 5.8% xii. Simmano 226 25 Neua 11.1% xiii. Simmano 184 55 Tay 30.4% xiv. Nalong 278 3 1.1% 1 district 4 communes 14 villages 3,555 HHs 217 AHHs 6.1% * Source: Lao 2005 Census ** Source: Updated survey May 2012 1. The Affected Households 16. The 217 AHs headed by 173 males and 44 females consist of 217 APs who will be affected on their agricultural lands. While Hadxafong District especially the part nearing Vientiance Capital can be characterized as a built up area, all lands within the project have recently been subject to reclassification as agricultural lands (Decree 152), even though it is not all being used as an agricultural land. The most populated areas and thereby having most number of affected households (AHs) are found in Simmano Commune, the village of Simmano Tay in particular. 17. Table 2 shows the various impacts on households ranging from impacts on land, structure, and trees. Impact on land is more felt over impact on main structure. Other structures like fences are greatly affected given the alignment of 8 meters from centerline of the road-cum embankment. Land in Hadxafong District impact areas are mostly land use rights though a significant number of titled lands exist. AHHs Female HH HH Size # Main Total Area Table 2. Project Impact on Households Affected Area Severity Affected Structures Total Area Affected Area Elec Poles Fence Total land (m²) Affected land (m²) Lands Titled LURC Secondary Severity Severity Dongphosy % % 32.0 11.2 2 2 8 1 1250 400 7990 898.00 2 25 Khouydeng 20 4 87 20 25126.6 1,002.60 4.0% 19 67 Nalong 3 1 21 1 4777.5 307.50 6.4% 3 4 17.0 ngheo 18 5 64 3 204.76 86.4 14 53335.5 9,048.74 14 4 25 % 46.6 Parkpeng 8 2 52 2 146 68 8 4182 138.00 3.3% 8 3 % Pava 20 10 99 4 612.7 129 21.1 2 11 18535 1,289.39 7.0% 20 3 of Trees

6 % 11 25 7 Neua 6 1 72 6 8.3% 1 20 18150.5 1,174.60 6.5% 25 80 29 13 55 3 5 58 110061.6 3,897.00 3.5% 60 Tay 3 0 Thadeua 6 2 32 3 2017 46.30 2.3% 6 Thamuang 10 54 4802 190.11 4.0% 1 Thanaleng 10 4 43 5245 148.80 2.8% 8 2 1 Thapha 16 3 98 1 144 24 16.7 % 7 24659 440.00 1.8% 9 13 Thinthane 20 1 11 12.5 1 64 8 4 % 1 13 56774 825.25 1.5% 16 4 11 Thintom 4 21 4 1168 83.11 7.1% 4 TOTAL 217 44 1102 10 1097.46 253.4 23.1 33.5 36 3 1396 468 9 159 336823.7 19,489.40 5.8% 88 117 % % 2 2. Private Companies and Government Entities 18. There are 10 establishments (private companies and government) within the project area, namely: (i) Fuel store.2; (ii) Former private Company; (iii) Fork Fay Private company; (iv) Oil storage. 5 of Army; (v) Lao PepSi Company; (vi) Seeding Nursely Station (Govt Org); (vii) Former private factory; (viii) Tower (TICO company); (ix) Regulator, and (x) the District Army Office. 19. Table 3 indicates that impacts are relatively minimal, though 1 establishment will completely be affected by the project --- a Regulator on titled land amounting to 160 m2. Affected Village Table 3. Project Impact on Private and Government Establishments Area of land Area of of Affected Elec Fence occupied affected Severity Titled LURC Establishments Poles (m²) land (m²) State/ Community Dongphosy 2 2,950.00 780.00 26.4% 2 ngheo 7 2 7 260,750.00 2,781.80 1.1% 3 4 Pava 1 1 2,260.00 9.60 0.4% 1 Total 10 2 8 265,960.00 3,571.40 1.3% 3 4 3 3. Common Property 20. Twelve public institutions/common properties that will be affected by the project are: (i) Cultural park of Dongphosy; (ii) Village youth garden of Dongphosy; (iii) Friendship Bridge Border; (iv) Khouydeng Temple; (v) ngheo village Land; (vi) Pava Market (community land); (vii) Primary School of Thinthane; (viii) Thinthane Temple; (ix) Phonsavang-Thintom Temple; (x) a Secondary irrigation canal, (xi) a Main irrigaiton canal, and (xii) 21 eletricity posts (public asset). Summary of impacts are provided in Table 4. Table 4. Project Impact on Common/Public Property AFFECTED STRUCTURES AFFECTED LANDS Village of CP Affected Main Structure Tot Area of Main Struc -ture Elec Poles Fence Area of land occupied (m²) Area of affected land (m²) Aff Area of Main Structure Severity Severity Titled LURC State/ Community of Trees

7 Dongphosy 3 79,050 3,100.00 3.90% 3 150 Khouydeng 1 1 4,060 116 2.90% 1 ngheo 1 1 540 330 61.10% 1 7 Nalong 1 1 2,100 725 Tay 1 1 2,000 500 Pava 2 2 4,100 1,225 34.50 % 25.00 % 29.90 % 21 1 834 51.52 6.20% 2 Thinthane 2 2 9,600 240 2.50% 1 Thintom 1 1 1 8 Villages 29.90 12 8,200 2,450 21 6 94,084 3,837.52 4.10% 2 2 5 157 % B. Loss of Lands 21. Table 2 shows that out of the total 336,823.7 m² of lands held by 217 AHs, a total of 19,489.40 m² shall be acquired by the project. Overall severity is computed at 5.8%. Annex 1 provides the list of AHH with severity pegged at 10% or more. The impact of land acquisition in all villages including the common property resources is minimal except in the villages of ngheo (17%) and Dongphosy (11.2%). 1. Status of Ownership on Lands 22. The status of APs ownership on affected lands is subject to further validation during the updating of this RP. More than half (57%) of AHs possess LURCs and the rest are titled. Nine AHs manifest signs of being mere tennants, requiring further assessment during the updating of this RP. 23. Temporary Loss of Land. This RP will be updated during loan implementation after the approval by ADB. During the updating, the Project Implementation Consultants (PICs) will confirm if there shall be lands that will be used for temporary office of field personnel of the civil works contractor and station of heavy equipment. The environmental impacts of temporary land acquisition will be addressed in the updated environmental management plan. All lands temporarily acquired for the subproject shall be returned to its original condition, or better. C. Loss of Houses and/or Structures 1. Types of Affected Houses 24. There are four types of houses that shall be affected in the subproject areas, such as: (i) Type A: This house has two (2) floors made of bricks and cement and equipment are of high quality; (ii) Type B: This is one-storey house made of bricks and cement, with concrete floors and roofed with galvanized sheet and with high quality equipment; (iii) Type C: Typically a onestorey house, made of bricks and cement with galvanized iron roof; and (iv) Type D: This type of house is made of bamboos, galvanized iron sheets and wooden poles thatched to the ground.

8 25. Number of Affected Houses. A total 13 main and secondary structures shall be affected in the project area (Table 3). Severity is around 23% for houses and 33.5% for additional buildings aside from the main house. All 13 structures go beyond the 10% severity mark. However when loss is pitted against remaining/available land area it is revealed that they are capable of moving a few meters from their current location, except for 1 who also apparently appears to be a long-term tenant. 26. Resulting physical displacement of may be temporary since some have enough remaining lands even if they reorganize and expand the floor areas of their houses. Resettelment to a previously identified resettlement site in Xaythany District is remote with further assurance of available land for land within the commune if not within the same village. 2. Loss of Other Structures 27. Most other structures that will be affected during the clearing of the ROW are fences and electric posts shown in Tables 2, 3 and 4. Fences made of different construction materials have been noted, with 4,770 lm accruing to AHs, 960 lm for establishments and 720 lm as common property for a total of 6,450 lm. As for electric poles, 21 electricity distribution poles will be affected along the Pava Village market including some 9 with AHs and 2 for establishments in ngheo. 28. There are affected business shops in but these structures are mostly attached to the affected houses of the AHHs and shall be reorganized simultaneously during RP implementation and will be included in the compensation of affected houses. D. Loss of Crops and Trees 1. Trees 29. A total of 519 wood and fruit trees of various species shall be cleared from the ROW easement, of which, 362 trees are owned by AHs and 157 trees with establishments. Compensation for the affected trees will be based on their replacement costs. 2. Crops 30. Compensation for crops refers to the foregone one-year harvest of rice from the portion of agricultural lands that will be acquired for the subproject. It was assumed that each ha. of irrigated land yields 100 bags of unhusked white rice, or 50 bags per harvest. Each bag weighs 50 kg in which current selling price is averaged to LAK 3,600/kg. It had been suggested by the EA/IA during consultations that construction/rehabilitation shall be done in between croppings to minimize impacts on AHs. E. Disruption of Businesses 31. Excluding the five (5) private companies, there are 65 AHs who operate small business shops, and all are not licensed. The names AHs are found in the list of persons in Annex 2 stating who are entitled to receive compensation and assistance. 32. The structures of the small business shops are attached to the affected houses. Consequent to the clearing of the ROW, the operation of small business shops will be disrupted, albeit temporarily. The MAF, through the NPCO that will be created for the Project, will discuss such system during public consultation prior to RP implementation.

9 III. SOCIOECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE A. Socio-Economic Profile of Subproject Area 33. Socioeconomic information was obtained from 324 AHs along the 30.4-kilometer embankment when the IOL/SES was conducted from 16 October to 3 vember 2010. The AHs represent 6.4% of the total 5,067 households in 17 villages in three subproject host districts of Vientiane Capital, namely: Hadxayfong, Xaythani and Park Ngum. The objectives of the Flood Protection and Drought Mitigation Project are to: (i) protect the agricultural lands, industrial areas, urban settlement areas, places of national importance and infrastructure from the floods originating from the Mekong River; and (ii) improve the irrigation facilities serving the agricultural lands in the area. 34. The male typically head the household in Laos. Of the total AHs, majority or 82% is headed by male and 18% by female. As to their civil status, 80% are married, 1% is single, 18% are widows and 1% is separated. Average age is 46 years old; 45 for male and 46 for female. The youngest is 21 years old while the eldest is 85, both female. Grouped according to their age structure, 18.7% of the HHs belong to the young adults (21 39 years old), 63.8 % comprised the adults (40 59 years old), and 17.5% belong to the elderly (60 years old and above). The distribution shows that majority (82.5%) of the heads of affected households belong to the productive age groups (20-59 years old). 35. The AHs have a combined population of 1,374 as of the completion of IOL representing 5.4% of the total population in 17 villages. About 59.6% are male and 40.4% are female. Table 5 presents the age and gender distribution of AHs population where it shows that 18.6% belong to the young population, at 15 years old and below. About 74.5% belong to the labor force, at 16 60 years old, of which 43.7% are men and 30.8% are women. And next to this age range is 61 years old and above equivalent to 6.9% of the total household population who are elderly. Table 5. Gender Distribution of Household Members (%) Age Distribution of HHs Male Female Total 5 years old and below 4.2 2.7 6.9 6 10 years old 3.6-3.6 11 15 years old 4.5 3.6 8.1 16 20 years old 7.0 5.0 12.0 21 25 years old 9.0 5.8 14.8 26 30 years old 6.7 4.1 10.8 31 35 years old 4.4 3.2 7.6 36 40 years old 4.5 4.2 8.7 41 45 years old 3.9 2.8 6.7 46 50 years old 2.8 2.4 5.2 51 55 years old 3.6 2.4 6.0 56 60 years old 1.8 0.9 2.7 61 65 years old 1.8 1.0 2.8 66 years old and above 1.8 2.3 4.1 Total 59.6 40.4 100.0 HH = household Source: Processed from Socioeconomic Survey 36. With this population structure, it suggests that the AHs have highly productive members and contribute to the incomes of their households. 37. The HHs are highly literate with 15.2% have college education, 39.2% reached the secondary level and 45.6% with elementary school education.

10 38. Seventy six of the AHs have been in the subproject areas for more than 31 years, 10% from 21-30 years, 5% from 11 20 years, and 9% have settled in the area less than five (5) years ago. As to their geographic origins, 83% were raised in the same communes, 9% from other communes, 5% from other districts, and only 3% came from other provinces. B. Socio-Economic Profile of Affected People 1. Occupations of the Household Heads 39. Both male and female heads of the AHs are into various occupations. As shown in Table 6, majority, or 65.4%, is into farming, 6.8% work in private companies, 6.4% work in district government and the rest into various occupations like trading, teaching, worker for hire and driving. Four percent are retirees. During the IOL, further inquiries were conducted with the respondents if the HHs have secondary occupations. Of the total HHs, 64.4% confirmed in affirmative while 31.6% are pre-occupied with their main jobs. While there are households headed by female, similar pattern can be observed on their occupations suggesting equality of skills in both genders of the HHs. Table 6. Occupations of Household Heads (%) Occupations of HHs Male Female Total Farming 54.4 11.0 65.4 Government employees 6.0 0.4 6.4 Trading 4.6 0.4 5.0 Private company employees 5.7 1.1 6.8 Teaching 3.9 0.7 4.6 Worker/laborer 1.0 0.4 1.4 Driving 3.6 2.8 6.4 Retiree 2.8 1.2 4.0 Total 82.0 18.0 100.0 HH = household. Source: Processed from Socioeconomic Survey 2. Household Incomes 40. Households monthly incomes vary owing to the types and qualities of livelihoods that their working members are engaged in. Grouped data from the IOL/SES shows that the mode of monthly income is at the range of LAK 1,000,000 1,999,999 million ($125 250) for 22% of the AHs. This is closely followed by LAK 2,000,000 2,999,999 ($250 375) income of 21% of AHs, and by below LAK 1,000,000 ($125) for 16% of the AHs. By type of occupation, the HHs working in private companies have the highest monthly incomes which average to LAK 10,000,000 ($1,250). But 2% of the AHs engaged in selling construction materials are exceptions because they have incomes that range at LAK 20,000,000 38,000,000 ($ 2,500 4,750) a month. As to AHs earning below LAK 1,000,000, one (1) percent suggest that they are in extreme poverty for they are earning LAK 200,000 250,000 ($25 31) per month. On daily basis, this is equivalent to $1.00 per day or less. 3. Monthly Expenses 41. As to monthly expenses of AHs on their most pressing basic needs, food is first (33%), fuel for cooking is second (27%), electricity is third (26%), and education is fourth (7%), as miscellaneous items share 7%. In comparing the AHs monthly income vis-à-vis the average monthly expenses of each income bracket, it shows that 39% have income deficits, 9% are break-even and 52% have excess incomes (Table 7).

11 Table 7. Status of AHs Monthly Incomes vs. Monthly Expenses Income Range With Deficits Breakeven With Excess Income Below LAK 1,000,000 6-10 16 LAK 1,000,000 1,999,999 8 6 8 22 LAK 2,000,000 2,999,999 9 2 10 21 LAK 3,000,000 3,999,999 3-5 8 LAK 4,000,000 4,999,999 7-2 9 LAK 5,000,000 5,999,999 6 1 2 9 LAK 6,000,000 6,999,999 - - 3 3 LAK 7,000,000 7,999,999 - - 2 2 LAK 8,000,000 8,999,999 - - 2 2 LAK 9,000,000 9,999,999 - - 1 1 LAK 10,000,000 & above - - 7 7 Total 39 9 52 100 Source: Processed from Socioeconomic Survey 42. In order to save on household expenses, particularly food, 32% of the AHs are growing vegetables, growing of fruit trees and raising livestock in their backyards for their own consumption, the excess is for sale. About 21% are borrowing money in coping up with their daily expenses. 4. Access to Social and Public Services 43. Practically all houses of AHs have electricity connections. When it comes to source of water for domestic use, majority or 62% have their own deep wells. The other households obtain water from the Mekong River or get it from their neighbors. For their drinking water, 73% buy bottled water while the rest are getting from deep wells. They are in close proximity to the school of their children, have access to hospital or clinic given that their area is part of Vientiane Capital or in the nearby urban area of Chantabouli. 5. Vulnerable APs 44. Initial identified vulnerable households are those with elderly, female-headed households, households falling below the poverty line, and ladless/tennants (see Table 8). Poverty line was established by referring to the World Bank computation of daily income falling below $1.25 per HH member 2. Village Table 8. Vulnerable HHs in Project Sites Landless Elderly Female / Headed Headed Tennants HH HH HH HH HH HH HH HH of Vulnerable HH Total HH Below Poverty Line HH < $1.25 / day HH Size Size Size Size Dongphosy 2 2 8 Khouydeng 9 7 29 4 14 3 14 Nalong 2 1 9 1 7 ngheo 13 8 40 2 10 5 16 1 5 Parkpeng 5 2 13 2 11 1 6 Pava 13 8 41 9 37 1 5 Neua 11 3 16 7 29 5 19 Tay 18 13 74 3 15 7 44 2 World Bank, Development Research Group. 2010.

12 Village Landless of / Vulnerable Tennants HH HH HH Elderly Headed HH HH HH Female Headed HH HH HH HH Below Poverty Line HH < $1.25 / day HH Size Size Size Size Thadeua 6 5 30 3 12 Thamuang 2 1 5 1 5 Thanaleng 5 1 5 4 18 Thapha 6 5 35 3 19 1 8 Thinthane 3 1 5 1 4 1 6 TOTAL 95 a 8 40 49 272 44 190 21 112 a To avoid double counting in term of HH possessing more than one type of vulnerability 6. Impacts of Involuntary Resettlement on Women 45. The 26 HH female represent undisputedly play significant roles in sustaining their families by being actively involved in various occupations. But, given the result of land acquisition in the subproject area, none of them shall either be physically or economically displaced permanently for they will remain their place. On impacts to properties, female-headed households shall also experience losses as with the households headed by male. 46. During the implementation of the updated version of this RP, MAF will comply with ADB s Policy on Gender and Development (1998) as a key strategy to promoting equity. As per ADB SPS, the affected properties of households headed by female will be valued the same as that of the households headed by male, i.e. compensation based on replacement cost, at preproject level. They are also entitled to receive allowances and assistance. IV. POLICY FRAMEWORK AND ENTITLEMENTS 47. The legal and policy framework for compensation, resettlement and rehabilitation in this RP is defined by the relevant laws and regulations of the GoL, and the Safeguard Requirements 2 of the 2009 Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) and the relevant cross-cutting policy themes of ADB. The Bank s other cross-cutting policy themes that have bearing on resettlement planning and implementation are (i) Gender and Development [1998] and the Gender Mainstreaming Criteria Guidelines (2010); (ii) Public Communications Policy [2005]; and (iii) Accountability Mechanism [2005]. A. Policy Framework 1. Relevant Laws and Regulation in Lao PDR 48. The 1991 Constitution of Lao PDR has several provisions in Article s. 6, 8, 14 and 15 as well as 28 which are relevant to involuntary resettlement. The Study on Expropriation and Compensation in Lao PDR (2007) 3, sponsored by Lao-German Land Policy Development Project, had identified 14 legislations and analyzed their provisions as to their applicability and responsiveness to the public. However, the Prime Minister s Decree. 192/PM (2005) - Compensation and Resettlement of People Affected by Development Projects is considered fully compliant with ADB s Policy Requirements 2. The implementing provisions are outlined in Regulation. 2432/STEA-PMO (2005) Regulations for Implementing Decree. 192/PM, 3 Land Policy Study. 11 (December 2007) under Lao Land Titling Project II, entitled Study on Expropriation and Compensation in Lao PDR sponsored by Lao-German Land Policy Development Project.

13 which was further clarified in Regulation. 699/PMO, WREA (March 2010) that contains the Technical Guidelines on Compensation and Resettlement of People Affected by Development Projects. The guidelines in Regulation. 699/PMO, WREA (March 2010) were formulated from ADB and the World Bank policies through ADB TA. 3133-LAO: Strengthening Social and Environmental Management in Lao PDR (July 2000). 2. ADB s Social Safeguard Policies 49. Safeguard Requirements 2 of the Bank s 2009 SPS defines the following objectives of involuntary resettlement (i) avoid involuntary resettlement whenever feasible; (ii) minimize involuntary resettlement by exploring project and design alternatives; (iii) restore livelihoods; and (iv) improve the standards of living of the displaced poor and vulnerable households. Its scope range from physical displacement (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter) to economic displacement (loss of land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihoods) as a result of (a) involuntary acquisition of land, or (b) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas. Further, it stipulates whether such losses and involuntary restrictions are full or partial, permanent or temporary. 3. Gap Analysis and Gap-Filling Measures 50. The recent changes in the Government of Lao PDR legislation related to compensation and resettlement represents a significant increased alignment of the government s policies and ADB s safeguards requirements with regard to the rights of citizens when their livelihoods, possessions and society are affected by development projects. 51. Both Lao Law and ADB policies entitle affected household to compensation for affected land and non-land assets at replacement cost. Decree 192/PM (Article 8) defines severely affected households as those losing 20% or more of their income generating assets while ADB uses a threshold of 10%. There are no other significant differences between ADB SPS and Lao PDR regulation on resettlement. To address this difference, the Project defines severely affected households who are entitled to economic rehabilitation assistance as those as those who will (i) lose 10% or more of their total productive income generating assets due to the project, (ii) have to relocate; or (iii) lose 10% or more of their total income sources due to the project 52. Both Lao Law and ADB policies entitle non-titled APs to compensation for affected assets at replacement cost and other assistance so that they are not made worse off due to the Project. Decree 192/PM goes beyond ADB s policy and provides APs living in rural or remote areas, or APs in urban areas who do not have proof of land-use rights and who have no other land in other places, compensation for their assets and other assistance. Should APs be found to be non-titled and required to relocate, the Project will ensure they are provided replacement land at no cost to the APs, or cash assistance to purchase replacement land within the village. B. Eligibility for Compensation and Other Assistance 53. Cut-off Date of Eligibility. All affected households who are identified in the projectimpacted areas on the cut-off date will be entitled to compensation for their affected assets, and rehabilitation measures sufficient to assist them to improve or at least maintain their pre-project living standards, income-earning capacity and production levels. The cut-off date is defined as the final day of the census of potentially affected households. Those who settle in the

14 subproject area after the cut-off date will not be entitled to compensation or any other assistance. 54. All APs whose personal information were recorded in the IOL/SES are eligible for compensation and assistance. The list of APs was signed and validated by the 14 village chiefs and provided the EA/IA this May 2012. C. Entitlement Matrix 55. The project entitlements developed and presented in the Entitlement Matrix (Table 9) are based on the coverage of impacts. Entitlements adopted are consistent with the Prime Minister s Decree. 192/PM (2005), Regulation. 2432/STEA-PMO (2005) and Regulation. 699/PMO, WREA (March 2010), and consistent with ADB s SPS (2009) Safeguard Requirement 2 on Involuntary Resettlement. The entitlements prescribed in this document may be enhanced and/or improved, as necessary, in the updated version of this RP. Table 9. Entitlement Matrix TYPE OF LOSS ELIGIBILITY ENTITLEMENTS I. Loss of Land A. Permanent loss of land APs or households with titles or land use rights certificates (LURCs), OR in the process of obtaining one or those with customary land use rights whose livelihoods are not undermined by permanent land acquisition. Cash compensation at replacement value based on market prices that reflect recent land sales of comparable land the district and other nearby areas, and in the absence of such recent sales, based on productive value. If losses are less than 10% of their total agricultural land: cash compensation for the affected portion of the land including assets and cash compensation for the affected portion of the land including assets and cash compensation for acquired land at 100% replacement cost. If losses are 10% or more of their total agricultural land (severely affected), cash compensation and first priority for land-for-land of equivalent productive capacity at a location acceptable to AHs, or if requested, cash compensation for the lost land at 100% of replacement IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES If land-for-land is offered, title or LURC should be registered to both husband and wife

15 TYPE OF LOSS ELIGIBILITY ENTITLEMENTS B. Temporary loss of land Only APs or households with titles or LURCs whose livelihoods are not undermined by permanent land acquisition. cost and allowance. If the total cost of area of replacement land is lower than the affected land, the difference will be paid in cash equivalent to replacement cost based on unit price applied in the calculation of compensation for land. Severely affected AHs are also entitled to participate in a suitable income restoration program over and above their entitlements and compensation, allowance and rehabilitation assistance. Replacement land of equal value acceptable to AP. New LURC will be issued in the names of husband and wife, at EA s expense; or, payment in cash of the whole property based on market value if remaining portion is no longer viable for its use. In case of residential land where the remaining land is no longer viable for residential use, acquisition of the entire landholding may not be necessary if this may be permitted for other use, e.g. small business shop. compensation for land. Compensation to damaged crops or assets. Civil works contractor will pay rent to owners of leased land. The land will be restored to its original or better condition and returned to the landowner within the agreed timeframe IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES Planning of a suitable income restoration program (IRP) for the severely affected and vulnerable AHs will be done during RP updating following the completion of the DMS. The IRP will be designed with the active participation of the AHs and in consultation with livelihood agencies and training institutes. The income restoration program may include agricultural extension trainings, access to credit, provision of seeds, non-agricultural activity creation, etc. The viability of remaining land will be officially determined by the district resettlement committees and concurred with the APs during DMS If temporary land acquisition will damage crops or assets, land should be restored to its original or better than the original form, it should

16 TYPE OF LOSS ELIGIBILITY ENTITLEMENTS II. Loss of House and/or Structure A. Affected house Owners of affected and/or structure house or structure regardless of their tenure status on affected land. Totally affected: Cash compensation based on replacement cost, equivalent to current market prices of: (i) materials with no provision for deduction of depreciation or salvageable value of construction materials, plus labor cost to cover dismantling, transfer and rebuilding including utilities installed or associated thereon. All severely affected persons in need to be relocated to a new site, or reorganizing in existing location, shall be entitled to food support for each person in the household equivalent to 16Kgs of rice at current market value for a period of six (6) months. They will also be entitled to participate in the income restoration program. AHs displaced due to loss of residential house but without any impact on business or source of incomes will be entitled to food allowance for each household member for a period of three (3) months. Partially affected: Cash compensation of affected portion, cost of dismantling of affected area and repair on unaffected portion. impact on secondary structure but will require relocation: If the structures are moveable and will not require any IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES be on the account of the civil works contracts Severely affected persons will be determined based on established criterion for vulnerability during RP preparation The amount of moving allowance will be determined during resettlement plan preparation

17 TYPE OF LOSS ELIGIBILITY ENTITLEMENTS B. Graves Graves located in the areas acquired/ Households who own the graves III. Loss of Business or livelihood A. Loss of business or livelihood during relocation/ dismantling repair of affective shop (without relocation) Owners of shops/business regardless of tenure status dismantling or will not cause any damage during relocation to new site, owners of structures will be given moving allowance to cover payment for labor. Cash compensation for all costs of execution, movement and reburial For informal business (shops) cash assistance equivalent to the average net income per day multiplied by the number of days of business disruption Assistance to mobile vendors /hawkers to temporarily shift for continued activity For construction activities involving unavoidable disruption, compensation for lost income or a transitional allowance for the period of disruption whichever is greater An income restoration program will be prepared during the RP updating by consultation with AHHs. The income restoration program may include agricultural extension trainings, access to credit, provision of seeds, non-agricultural activity creation, etc. IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES The net income per day as basis for establishing cash assistance B. With relocation Owners of shops/business regardless of tenure status Provision of alternative business site of equal size and location with good access to customers satisfactory to the AHs, or cash compensation at full replacement value, if suitable replacement land is not available. Relocating APs without any impact on business or source

18 TYPE OF LOSS ELIGIBILITY ENTITLEMENTS IV. Loss of Crops and Trees Trees and standing Owners of trees crops and/or crops regardless of tenure status V. Special Assistance This type of Vulnerable group assistance is intended for vulnerable AHs as well as those who may become vulnerable as the result of the project. of incomes will be provided with transfer/ relocation assistance. Standing crops: cash compensation equivalent to 1.5 of annual gross value per year. Provide time allowance to APs for the harvest of perennial and/or nonperennial crops. For perennial trees: cash compensation at replacement cost equivalent to current market value based on type, age, and productive capacity For timber trees: cash compensation at replacement cost equivalent to current market value based on type, age and diameter at breast height of trees Vulnerable groups will be entitled to special assistance/income restoration, over and above their entitlements and compensation, allowance and rehabilitation assistance, to ensure that they are able to reestablish themselves and improve their income levels. The income restoration program may include agricultural extension trainings, access to credit, provision of seeds, nonagricultural activity creation, etc. VI. Impacts on Common or Public Resources Public infrastructure facilities Management bodies Provision of new access to common resources, IA will arrange with the public service utility provider for the transfer of the affected facility components at their own IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES Average production will be determined and the methodology used will be defined in the preparation of final RP Compensation will be based on the volume of recovery at current market value of timber trees Special assistance will be based on the factors of vulnerability that will be prepared trhough consultation with the household during RP updating. Location of new access to common resources will be disclosed to affected communities prior to project civil works

19 TYPE OF LOSS ELIGIBILITY ENTITLEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES expense AH = affected household, AP = affected person, DMS = Detailed Measurement Survey, DP = displaced person, EA = executing agency, IA = implementing agency, LURC = land use rights certificate, RP = resettlement plan V. COMPENSATION, RELOCATION AND REHABILITATION ARRANGEMENTS 56. The preceding compensation policy further explains the coverage of compensation that each type of AP is entitled to receive given their status of ownership to the affected lands and other assets, as indicated in the Entitlement Matrix. Compensation and assistance will be provided to APs prior to their displacement. A. Compensation Arrangements 1. Permanent Land Acquisition 57. Entitled to receive compensation for land are 217 AHHs, 10 establishments, and 10 pulic/common properties 1.1 For Permanently Affected Agricultural Land (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) APs with losses less than 10% of their total agricultural landholdings will be entitled to cash compensation for the affected portion of the land including assets thereon, and cash compensation for acquired land at 100% replacement cost. APs with losses of more than 10% of their total agricultural landholdings, will be entitled to cash compensation and first priority for land-for-land of equivalent productive capacity at a location acceptable to APs or, if requested, cash compensation for the lost land at 100% of replacement cost and allowances. If land-for-land compensation, the replacement land should be of equal value acceptable to APs. But if the area of replacement land is lower than the affected land, the difference will be paid in cash equivalent to replacement cost based on the unit price applied in the calculation of compensation for land. If the affected land has 10% or more impacts and still viable for use, the title or the LURC shall be reconstituted at EAs expense and named to both husband and wife. New LURCs for replacement land will be issued to APs at the expense of MAF and the IAs, and named to both husband and wife. If the APs prefer for cash, compensation will be at replacement cost based on the approach described in (i) and (ii) above. All severely affected households (experience impacts on 10% or more of their agricultural/productive land or assets) are also entitled to participate in an income restoration program to help restore their income and standards of living to at least pre-project condition. 1.2. For Permanently Affected Residential, Commercial and/or Institutional as well as Government Land (i) Conditions for compensation shall be the same as that of the compensation for permanently affected agricultural land.

20 (ii) (iii) (iv) Replacement land for affected land and acceptable to commercial and/or institutional AP. Where the remaining residential land is no longer viable for such use, acquisition of the entire landholding may not be necessary if this is located in built-up area and may be permitted for other use, especially small business shop. Provision for lot if the AP chose to be relocated in resettlement site/s with security of tenure. 2. Temporary Land Acquisition 58. Compensation for temporarily affected land shall be ascertained during the subproject implementation. But in case that temporary land acquisition shall be required for easement at the ROW and for temporary work station, the following policies will apply for Holders of LURC or Title to Temporarily Affected Land: (i) (ii) (iii) Civil works contractor will pay rent or lease to the owners, under a written agreement as arranged by the respective district government hosting the subproject. Crops planted thereon or assets shall be compensated based on replacement cost. Civil works contractor will restore the temporarily affected land to its original or better condition, as may be desired by the landowner. 3. Voluntary Land Contributions 59. The ADB-SPS on Involuntary Resettlement does not apply to negotiated settlements even if among the stakeholders, unless expropriation would result upon the failure of negotiations. This RP recognizes the consultation processes, policies, and laws that are applicable to such transactions; third-party validation; mechanisms for calculating the replacement costs of land and other assets affected; and record-keeping efforts. Voluntary land acquisition for FDRMMP can be applied using a Voluntary Land Donation Form (See Annex 6 for a sample form) and must be attached to the Village RP and following the following principles: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) Project site is selected in full consultation with landowners and any nontitled affected people; Voluntary donations do not severely affect the living standards of affected people and the amount of agricultural or other productive land to be acquired from each AP does not exceed 5% of the total productive landholdings of the household; Land donations are linked directly to benefits for the affected people; Any voluntary donation will be confirmed through written record and verified by an independent third party such as the external/independent monitoring entity; The grievance process (as described above) is applied; AP will be displaced from housing and severely affected; and Vulnerable AP(s) will directly benefit from IRP of the Project 60. In cases of impacts on livelihood sources, impacts of which are determined to be minor and the affected households do not want to receive compensation for the impacts; the above procedures will be applied. If the impacts are significant as can be finalized during the consultations with the affected households, the compensation and options for assistance must be discussed with the affected households and presented in the RP. The affected households shall be automatically included in the income restoration program of the Project.

21 4. Affected Structures and Houses 61. About 13 AHs who have titles to their lands are entitled to receive compensation for their affected houses. The policies are: (i) (ii) (iii) Cash compensation to the affected house or structure based on replacement cost without deduction for depreciation or the remaining value of salvageable materials, plus cost of labor for the construction of a new house or structure, including utilities installed or associated thereon, such as electricity connection, well, fences, etc. AHs reorganizing in their existing location shall be entitled to food support for each member of the household at 16 kg per month for six (6) months. Severely affected households who will experience physical displacement from pre-project place of residence are also entitled to participate in an income restoration program to help restore their income and standards of living to at least pre-project condition. 62. They will not be provided with transportation or moving allowance since they will just reorganize themselves in the remaining lands. 63. Land acquisition and clearing of the ROW will affect some 21 electricity poles in Pava Village. Likewise, access to common resources in the 14 villages may also be affected that can disrupt the mobility of residents. Given these two potential issues, the MAF and the IA will: (i) (ii) Inform the Electricité du Laos to transfer their electricity distribution poles outside the easement of the ROW prior to initiation of the clearing, at their own expense. Advice the civil works contractor to provide residents their temporary access to common resources, such as to adjoining roads, Mekong River or in forest grounds as well as in rice paddies during subproject construction. 5. Disruption of Businesses 64. The IOL has accounted for 65 AHs whose business shall be affected. Economically displaced persons (EDPs) are compensated for the loss of income during transition period. Assistance will be provided if there are such EDPs found during the updating and implementation of the RP. 6. Affected Crops and Trees 65. Whether the APs have LURCs, titles or without to the affected lands, they are entitled to receive compensation on the following assets that they will lose as the result of land acquisition. (i) (ii) Loss of Crops APs will be provided time allowance for the harvest of perennial or nonperennial crops. This will be done after MAF has notified the people in the villages following receipt of ADB s approval on updated RP. Cash compensation based on prevailing market price for unharvested crops that are near or ready for harvest at the time of land acquisition. Cash compensation for potential crops that could be produced from the portions of agricultural that will be acquired for ROW, based on prevailing market price in the subproject host area. Loss of Wood Trees and Fruit Trees

22 Compensation shall be based on age and commercial value of the fruit trees and wood trees. B. Relocation Strategies 66. APs will not be displaced until the village allocates land within the same or neighboring village. The provision of resettlement site is a contingent measure during RP implementation in case there shall be households who want to be relocated from their present place. This option will be validated during the DMS. But in case there shall be such option, the Chief of Urban and Housing Development in the Government of Vientiane Capital has already confirmed its availability. Located at Km 21 in Xaythani District, the 18-ha relocation site is now home to households who were relocated in the area upon implementation of ngchanh and Thongkhamkham Development Project. Each family was awarded 500 m² of land and was issued the title. The same shall be provided to AHs under the project. 67. The area is less susceptible to floods as social services like schools, hospital or health clinics remains accessible to APs, and is within the proximity of the areas where the majority of household heads and/or their household members are employed or derive their livelihoods. It has electricity distribution lines and the access road is already developed. 68. Relocating households shall be provided with opportunities to participate in (i) identifying and selecting options to transfer within their existing plots; (ii) move to areas provided by the IA; and (iii) receive cash compensation and make their own arrangements for relocation. 69. Where businesses are to be relocated, assistance will be provided to find alternative and viable sites. Severely affected households (loss of 10% or more productive assets) will be provided with replacement land or assisted to purchase replacement land. Implementers may consider provision of inputs (i.e., farm inputs to increase productivity on remaining land and/or replacement land). At implementation, appropriate livelihood restoration packages will be designed and implemented in consultation with APs. C. Income Restoration Program and Assistance to Vulnerable Groups 70. Aside from compensation and allowances that severely affected households (those losing more than 10% of their productive land and/or assets; and those who will have to relocate from their pre-project place of residence/employment) and vulnerable households will receive for their losses as provided in the entitlement matrix, they are entitled to participate in an income restoration program (IRP) to restore their income and livelihoods to at least pre-project levels. This Program will be designed during RP updating with the AHHs active involvement and in consultation with livelihood agencies and training institutes. 71. A total of 61 severely affected households; 65 AHHs (345 affected persons) who will experience business disruption, and 95 vulnerable AHHs (493 affected persons) will be entitled to participate in the income restoration program. 72. The following income restoration measures are proposed for consideration in the planning of the IRP: 73. a. Priority in employment in the construction and operation of the Project for qualified and interested APs of both genders. In line with this, APs will be informed of available jobs related to the project and advised on how to apply.

23 74. b. Provision of training for APs who wish to improve or change occupation and development of an appropriate training program and pilot projects with support from livelihood agencies and training institutes including seed capital (in kind). 75. On top of these IRP activities, the project, as inherent in its design and budget shall provide Community-Based Disaster and Risk Management trainings and consultation to enable AHHs to become resilient in their daily activities within flood prone areas. 76. For the purposes of budgeting, it is assumed that there is no double-counting between severely affected and vulnerable households. Please note, however, that some vulnerable households may also be among those severely affected. A lump sum of 532,730,000.00 LAK (approximately 66,591.25 USD) is allocated in this RP for the IRP. Derivation of cost considers the severely AHHs vulnerable individuals, AHHs due to loss of income from business disruption. Cost estimates are based on current monthly income, business disruption, and formula for assistance to vulnerability status. IRP cost will be taken from the contingency cost amounting to USD 351,589.09. D. Due Diligence during the DMS 1. Replacement Cost Survey 77. Consistent with the compensation policy in this RP, replacement cost surveys (RCS) were conducted in order to establish a reference in setting up the unit price rates based on replacement cost using both primary and secondary sources. For the current value of land, primary data were obtained from 32 AHs and non-ahs in 17 villages while secondary data were supplied by five (5) staff from the Provincial Agricultural Office (PAFO), the District Agriculture Office (DAFO), Land Management Authority and Land Taxation Unit. This approach was adopted in setting up the indicative budget for the compensation of land but which principles defined in para. 101 (i) and (ii) will be further refined during the updating of this RP. For construction materials, the data were obtained from three (3) suppliers of construction materials in Hadxayfong and Sysatanak districts and four (4) AHs with affected structures. For the prices of trees, the data were supplied by DAFO and three (3) AHs, both from Hadxayfong district. Since rice is the only crop that shall be affected by land acquisition, the unit price for unhusked rice was solely based on the average buying price of white rice by traders in Vientiane Capital as of March 2011. The result of RCS is shown in Annex 5. 78. All compensation will be based on replacement cost. Replacement cost is the amount calculated which is needed to replace an affected asset without deduction for taxes and/or costs of transaction as follows: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) Agricultural land based on actual current market prices that reflect recent land sales in the area, and in the absence of such recent sales, based on recent sales in comparable locations with comparable attributes, fees and taxes or in the absence of such sales, based on productive value. Residential land based on actual current market prices that reflect recent land sales, and in the absence of such recent land sales, based on prices of recent sales in comparable locations with comparable attributes, fees and taxes. Houses and other related structures based on actual current market prices of materials and labor without deduction for depreciation or deduction for salvaged building materials. Annual crops equivalent to current market value of crops at the time of compensation.

24 VI. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION AND GRIEVANCE REDRESS A. Consultation and Participation 79. Meaningful consultation with affected people has started at the earliest stage during the preparation of the Project (PPTA stage) and after FFM. Women, vulnerable people, district governments and local leaders were among the participants of consultations. They actively participated by giving ideas and suggestion on resettlement issues and disaster risk management. Relevant information related to project, especially on entitlements and options have been disclosed accordingly through PIB and through discussions. The consultation will continue during updating process and implementation of RP. 80. In compliance with ADB s Public Communication Policy: Disclosure and Exchange of Information (2005), the MAF and the IAs in Vientiane City Government will promote the active participation of the subproject-based stakeholders who were identified in the series of subproject disclosure and public consultations. They include the following: (i) the residents of 14 villages; (ii) the AHHs; (iii) the district government; and (iv) the MAF. Their participation during the updating and implementation of this RP is also expected. 1. Consultation and Participation during RP and Sub-Project Design / Preparation 81. Preliminary consultation activities have been initiated during the RETA carried on through 2012. During the public meetings in Hadxayfong district, and copies of Project Information Booklets (PIBs), written in Lao language, were given to all participantsincluding women, vulnerable people, district governments and local leaders. Each public meeting was divided in two parts, with first part dealt with the visual presentation of subproject and the preliminary engineering design. This was followed by discussions about: (a) consensus building, (b) understanding socio-economic conditions of project areas such as poverty, education, health, income, adverse impacts of flood and drought to the peoples in their localities, and (c) issues on project site clearance, relocation, resettlement of AHs and compensation. The second part was focus group discussion with women on: (i) situation of their living condition in their communes; (ii) their activities in their homes and communities; (iii) their limitations and capabilities in the project areas; (iv) impacts of floods and droughts; and (v) resettlement. Date and Venue 8.25 a.m. 01 Oct. 2010 Tanaleng Temple Hadxayfong District. Name of Persons Mr. Khampanh, Village Leader Sithan Thay Village Ms. Amphone Hadxayfong Neua Village Ms. Somchanh Deputy Village Leader Simmano Village Mr. Thavone Deputy Village Leader Thapha Village Mr. Khanthaly Deputy District Leader Hadxayfong District Source: Minutes of Public Consultation in Hadxayfong District. Table 10. Highlights of Public Consultations Issues / Recommendations Raised agricultural lands will be affected in their village. Only few households will be affected in the extension area. However, they are ready to move from the area. What should be done to electricity pillars along the 28 km length of the service road? We proposed that the subproject be constructed along the river in order to reduce the number of persons to be affected. More than 200 households will be affected if embankment is built along the road. It is proposed that embankment be constructed along the river since only 10 households shall be affected. Whatever is decided for the subproject construction, the engineering design should minimize the number of affected persons and consider two options: (i) survey of households along the track road; and/or (ii) survey for new track along the river to avoid and reduce the number of households to be affected.

25 82. In 2012, again a series of consultations were held, and below are the highlights: Issue Raised Responses from the meeting By Issue By Response 1 2 3 4 5 Khammai Ms. Maan Mr. Chanthason Meunsopha-from Pava village (House affected) Mr. Chanthason Meunsopha Maan consultation of your opinion on the cut-offdate for APs In Pava village, why there are some households did not sign the interview form? How we can do next? I asked Team survey when the project will be started, but no body answer? My house was affected and will be resettled, I have no money and no land, can the project provide the assistance? Last survey APs in ban Nalong is 27 HH, for this survey is only 3 HHs we like to consultation of your opinion on this matter, and last survey found the fence of the temple is affected, and Khmmai suggested the alignment should be designed to avoid of such affected Mr. Chanthalith Village Head of Ban Thamoung Ms. Boulom Phommaly, Deputy Village Head, Pava village Khammai Mr. Soukaseum Khammai Mr. Khanthaly, Vice District Governor We accept the cut-off-date, but APs should be informed 2-3 months before the commencement of the construction - Accept the cut-off-date. but APs should be informed 2-3 months before the commencement of the construction - Some APs did not stay at home during the survey. - I will be in charge for inform them. - Regarding the impact of the project, the fence of my property near by the embankment was also affected and I worry on this matter. Whatever, I fell good after reading PIB that Persons whose houses, structures and/or crops and even communal properties that will be affected will be properly compensated in cash or in kind I expected the project will be started to implement by the end of 2012 w the project is on going to finalize the feasibility study, RP and other documents, and then the project approval, will be designed in detail technically, the final RP and other documents will be develop according to the detailed design The affected house and others structures shall be compensated at replacement cost without deduction for depreciation or salvageable materials, plus provision of labor cost for dismantling and reconstruction. By this, the APs will be able to build a replacement house or structure District did not receive report of the last survey regarding to number of APs and the cost of resettlement. Whatever, we accept the alignment of the embankment as the team have been surveyed and we all understand that the Government will responsible for resettlement cost Mr. Ken - In Thinthane there are in total 23 APs

26 6 7 8 9 10 Mr. Khanthaly, Vice District Governor Ms. Boulom Mr. Chanthason Meunsopha Mr. Sommaly, Ban Parkpeng Mr. Chanthason Meunsopha Mr. Ken Thongphchnh, Village Head of Ban Thintane Mr. Chanthason Meunsopha Along Nalong road, there is other team survey for the road construction, and the survey boundary is different from this project boundary, this will makes people confuse Right now we want to know the exact project boundary If 2/3 of the house was affected, how does project do regarding to compensation? If project boundary indicated 8 m left and 8 m right from centre line, can we construct permanent building outside project boundary? Need official letter from related Authority on project information and need regular information sharing Support Chanthason suggestion, village need official letter on project boundary and others information What is the Principle and Process to implement the compensation and Thongphachanh, Village Head of Ban Thintane Phouvanh, DAFO Mr. Khanthaly, Vice District Governor Khammai Mr. Saveuy, Deputy to GD of DAFO Hadsayfong Mr. Khanthaly, Vice District Governor Mr. Khanthaly, Vice District Governor Mr. Khanthaly, Vice District Governor including temple fence and school; the numbers of APs of this survey is still the same number of the survey in 2010, because we did not allow people build any structure in the project boundary. - Regarding to the temple fence, there is no valuable thing inside the fence and we have no objection to remove it, The project boundary is 16 meters, 8 m left and 8 m left from centre line of embankment, in case of the embankment next to the Mekong bank, it will be 16 meters left from centre If 2/3 of your house was affected and you can not stay any more, then you should remove. This case you will receive full cost of rebuild of your house, As we know, project will do final design based on your opinions on how the impacts of the subprojects shall be minimized, consequence the alignment maybe change, if necessary Suggest people who want to build permanent structure, should meet and consult with Public work office, they may know and consider where will be allowed or will not be allowed to build the structure Based on experience from MoNRE project, 25 maters left and right from centre line, they do not allow any structure, and who wish to build any structure should request to public work office for consideration and approval - This is formal consensus of the meeting: 16 meters along the road are prohibited to build any structure - Regard to RCS, Land Administration Authority has adjusted the price of the land, have to find in Degree. 352 Project IAs will responsible for implement the compensation and resettlement activities

27 11 Maan resettlement of APs? Chines conducted the survey for road construction during Ban Simmano-Neu to Simmano-Tay road? Khammai Mr. Soukaseum Mr. Khanthaly, Vice District Governor - Project established NPCO at DOI, - IA office at subproject official s level, and Grievance Redress Committee. - Project will ensure that any movement of houses will be assisted. Shops or stalls will be within only a short distance of the existing structures. Shops and stalls will be relocated in consultation with the owners and with community representatives - The procedures of filing a grievance is provided in PIB, t only this road has been surveyed, every road has been surveyed either for public investment master plan and/or for project proposal preparation. Whatever, it never overlapping among public investment in the same area There is so many companies conducted the survey for road construction in this area, for instant Fuchiane company, Siafong company (Chines company), and for last time is Chitjaleunphone company. People here are very bored to response the interview to the survey team. Additionally, some case, villagers have been removed their structure already, but the company did not do any thing after that 2. Consultation with APs and Awareness of the Subproject 83. The AHs were appraised on the purpose of IOL/SES and were also given the PIBs as reflected in paragraph 82. The IOL/SES questionnaire has portions for AHs validation in connection with resettlement. 84. The AHs have no questions on the contents of the PIB given their generally positive perceptions that the subproject will be the answer to their problems brought about by floods, as exemplified in 2008 when plenty of households have been evacuated and 3,500 has. of rice paddies were damaged. However, some AHs were apprehensive on the transfer of their houses and the distance of resettlement site to work areas of their working members, if ever they will be relocated. On these concerns, the IOL/SES interviewers told them to read the PIB carefully since their queries would be addressed in the compensation policy of the RP. Overall, the AHs were optimistic and became aware of their rights to complain by speaking or writing to the concerned Project authority. 3. Consultation on RP Prior to Fact Finding Mission 85. The MAF and the IAs sent written invitation to APs and stakeholders for disclosure of this RP prior to fact finding mission by ADB, in coordination with the chiefs of the communes and villages. A summary RP in pamphlet form was prepared and translated to Lao language, and used during disclosure and consultation. This RP will be uploaded on the ADB website after ADB s review and approval thereof.

28 4. Consultations during RP Updating 86. In order to achieve the objectives for this particular activity, the Consultation and Participation Plan in Table 11 is prescribed during the RP updating. The Plan, which follows the same principles of meaningful consultations as described in Paragraph 80, outlines the mechanisms for conducting meaningful consultations with APs and other stakeholders, the information to be shared, method of dissemination, as well as institutional responsibilities. With assistance from NPCO, the MAF will hire the services of project consultants in accordance with ADB s Guidelines on the Use of Consultants (2007, as amended from time to time). One (1) international Social Safeguards Specialist and one (1) national counterpart shall be hired to assist in the consultation process. Stakeholder Groups APs, District Governor, chiefs of communes and villages, residents, NGOs, women s union and youth organizations. APs APs, District Governor, chiefs of communes and villages, residents, NGOs, women s union and youth organizations. APs Table 11. Consultation and Participation Plan for RP Updating Participation Methods Timeframe Reasons for Type of Participation Participation Responsibilit Method Start End y Awareness of Information FGD, Social First day Same day FDRMMP and sharing on the distribution of Safeguards of the the subproject Project and the PIB, use of Specialists, second information subproject visual aid/s, Project week of sharing; sharing of Coordination the third awareness of thoughts by Unit (PCU), month census and participants as and IAs. after DMS, written in index loan compensation cards effectiveness. and entitlement policy and cutoff date for eligibility of APs Determination of affected properties and productive assets To validate the requirement for resettlement site with APs To consult on compensation, entitlements, Sharing of information by APs on their affected properties and productive assets Consensus on the need for resettlement sites to APs Agreement and consensus on compensation, Census and DMS and dissemination of PIBs written in Lao language. Consultation and consensus seeking among stakeholders on resettlement site. Presentation of draft RP in local dialect of Contracted survey personnel Social Safeguards Specialists, PCU, and IAs. Day after the FGD Date to be indicate d in the subproject RP Date to be indicated in subproject RP Date to be indicated in the subproject RP

29 Stakeholder Groups APs Reasons for Participation and other types of assistance To share information Type of Participation entitlements, and other assistance Information sharing for external monitoring Participation Methods Timeframe Method Responsibilit y Start End APs - do - - do - - do - Individual interviews with APs External monitoring agent (EMA) External monitoring to be done on a quarterly basis; to be indicated in the RP implementation schedule. AP = Affected person, DMS = detailed measurement survey, FDRMMP = Flood and Drought Mitigation and Management Project, FGD = focus group discussion, IA = implementing agency, RP = Resettlement Plan, NGO = nongovernment organization, PCU = Project Coordination Unit, PIB = project information booklet, RP = Resettlement Plan. 87. Minutes of consultation meetings will be prepared and annexed to the updated RP. Women will be invited to participate in information sharing and planning in all stages of consultation during RP preparation. The RP will be uploaded at the ADB website. 6. Consultation and Participation during RP Implementation 88. The NPDO will coordinate with the chiefs of communes and villages to inform the APs on RP implementation upon official approval from ADB. Consultations with stakeholders will also be held to inform their roles during the clearing of embankments and acquisition of lands. The Consultation Plan at this stage is presented in Table 12. Table 12. Consultation and Participation Plan during RP Implementation Stakeholder Reasons for Type of Participation Methods Timeframe Groups Participation Participation Method Responsibility Start End APs, District Governor, chiefs of communes and villages, residents, NGOs, women s union and youth organizations. Awareness of RP implementation, the guidelines and procedures Information sharing on RP implementatio n, guidelines and procedures. Dissemination of the updated RP duly approved by ADB. PCU, International and national Social Safeguards Specialists Three days after receipt of official approval of updated RP from ADB. -do- 20 days after day one -do- To confirm the readiness of resettlement site, if needed. To select members of grievance and redress committee Assurance on the availability and readiness of resettlement sites for APs Consensus by stakeholders Consultation and assurance among stakeholders on resettlement site/s for APs Consensus by stakeholders PCU, International and national Social Safeguards Specialists Stakeholders

30 Stakeholder Groups APs APs APs, District Governor, chiefs of communes and villages, residents, NGOs, women s union and youth organizations. APs Reasons for Participation To consult and confirm on compensation, entitlements, and other types of assistance To consult on the final schedule of reorganizing their houses and structures To inform on the final schedule of reorganizing the houses and structures and the procedures and guidelines associated thereon. To share information Type of Participation Agreement on compensation, entitlements, and other assistance Confirmation of the final schedule on reorganization of houses and structures Information sharing on the final schedule, and the procedures of and guidelines for reorganizing the houses and structures. Information sharing for external monitoring Participation Methods Timeframe Method Responsibility Start End - do - One week after end pf the activities above Presentation of the details of assistance and compensation in compensation form with individual AP. Individual meeting with APs Joint meeting with stakeholders Individual interviews with APs EMA - do - 5 days after final agreement on compensation, entitlement and other types of assistance - do - 3 days after end of activities above ADB = Asian Development Bank, AP = affected person, EMA = External Monitoring Agent, RP = Resettlement Plan. 60 days after day one of this activity. 60 days after day one of this activity. 20 days after day one of this activity. External monitoring to be done on a quarterly basis; to be indicated in the RP implementation schedule. 89. Information education campaign (IEC) materials will be produced in popularized form for all APs across implementation levels, guided by ADB s 2009 SPS requirements (SR 2) and Public Communication Policy. 90. Minutes of every consultation meeting will be recorded and maintained as reference in case of grievances and for external monitoring. Women will be invited to participate in information sharing in all stages of consultation during RP implementation. B. Information Disclosure 91. The EA and IAs have ensured that the public and stakeholders are fully informed about the Project plans and activities at all stages. Meaningful consultations with the affected households have been carried out prior to the design of civil works. Affected persons have been encouraged to participate in the project design and resettlement processes, including: DMS, RCS, identification of sites, hand-over of entitlements, monitoring of impacts and benefits, and discussion and settlement of grievances. The EA and IAs have ensured that Public Information

31 Brochure (PIB) 4 were available at the meeting for consultation. The meeting provided opportunities and encouraged all participants to ask questions, expressed preferences and concerns and raise other issues. A report of the meeting and the issues raised have been included in the draft RP and will be included in the updated RP.. 92. Appropriate records of all consultation meetings have been annexed to the RP, including lists of participants, key discussion topics and issues of concern. 93. The RP has been concurred by Government and will seek ADB approval before being implemented. Key information in the RP has been provided to all AHs through the distribution of pamphlets or brochures or leaflets in local language and has been placed on the local/village announcement board and in other strategic location. All documents for affected people have been written in clear and transparent language consistent with the literacy level of the people affected. Copies of the RP and executive summary in the local language will be kept at the village offices and will be available for affected people. 94. The Resettlement Plan will be posted on the ADB website likewise with social monitoring reports prepared during implementation will be also uploaded on the ADB website. C. Grievance Redress 95. Article 13 of Decree 192/PM requires the Project to establish effective mechanisms for resolution of grievances caused by the Project. Lao PDR legal requirements for this mechanism are described in Part VI of the Decree s Implementing Regulations, and in detail in the Technical Guidelines. 5 The objectives are to enable affected people to monitor the implementation of the resettlement plan, and to have a transparent mechanism to register and resolve any complaints related to project implementation. Decree 192/PM defines that the prime responsibility for grievance resolution lies with the Project proponents. 96. As the Project proponent is responsible for carrying out Project works which are the likely source of grievances 6 they are best placed to respond to and resolve grievances in the most timely and acceptable manner. However, if AHs are not satisfied with the resolution offered by the Project proponent, they can route their complaints through the grievance resolution process managed by the resettlement committees established by the Project. The resettlement committees will establish a Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) 7 in each district covered by the subprojects. Grievances or complaints from AHs will be solved in a timely and satisfactory manner. 97. In general, the following steps shall be applied to resolve grievances during the preparation and implementation of the detailed resettlement plan. For each step details shall be described, agreed and explained to both the responsible resettlement committees and the residents of affected villages. Additional stages can be incorporated as appropriate. Subproject 4 5 6 The PIB will summarize the following information contained in the RP: (i) subproject description, (ii) subproject impacts including land acquisition requirements, (iii) rights and entitlements of DPs, (iv) compensation rates and allowances for different types of losses, (v) grievance redress procedures, (vi) organization roles and responsibilities and (vii) implementation schedules. In the case of a subproject RP where involuntary land acquisition involves resettlement impacts, the PIB will also describe the types of relocation and rehabilitation strategies and allowances. The PIB will also clearly indicate where and how DPs can obtain additional information. Technical guidelines on compensation and resettlement of people affected by development projects issued in vember 2005. Common sources of grievance and disputes are related to: the Detailed Monitoring Survey assessment of losses; the estimated replacement costs established by the replacement cost survey, assessment of eligibility for other allowances and assistance to affected persons, 7 Per Regulation. 699/PMO, WREA (March 2010), the GRC shall be composed of: (i) local government representative; (ii) village head(s); (iii) representative of affected households, other than village the head(s); (iv) village elders or local representatives of mass organization or non-benefit organization; (v) project EA or IA representatives; and (vi) women representative to deal with gender issues that may arise.

32 APs shall be assisted to understand the complaints and grievance mechanisms concerning related compensation and mitigation measures. Stage 1: Filing of complaints at subproject official s level. All complaints and grievances must be properly documented by local government officials and the IA. Complaints will be investigated through consultations aimed at resolving matters at the project level. The objective is to resolve disagreements through consensus wherever possible without being referred to the district-level GRC. All meetings will be held in public place with participation by representatives of the AHs, local non-benefit organizations, mass organizations and village head to ensure transparency. The subproject Implementing Agency (IA) at the District level must propose a resolution within 15 days from the filing of the complaint. Stage 2: Filing of complaints at GRC level. If a resolution proposed by the IA is not reached to the satisfaction of the community or AH, the complaints will be forwarded to the GRC. Stage 3: Filing of complaints at National Project Coordinating Ooffice (NPCO). If the AH does not receive a satisfactory response from GRC within 20 days of filing the complaint, or if the matter is not resolved to the satisfaction of the AH, the representative of AHs, local non-benefit organization or mass organization will, on behalf of the AH, submit the complaint to the EA-NPCO. Stage 4. Elevating complaints to Court of law. If the complaint or grievance is still unresolved within 20 days of receipt by the IA, the representatives of the local nonbenefit organization and mass organization will, upon request of the AH, forward the complaint to the Court of Law and follow-up with relevant authorities. Filing of complaints with the Court of Law may be done separately and independent of the project organized grievance resolution process at any stage of the process. The decision of the Court of Law is final. 98. Resettlement committees will provide quarterly reports to the Safeguards unit of the NPCO on grievances received, including names and pertinent information about the APs, nature of complaint, dates the complaints are lodged, and resolutions proposed. Grievances not resolved will be recorded, with detailed records of negotiations and proposals, which could not be agreed on, and the date of these negotiations. 99. The External Monitoring Agency will evaluate the procedures applied in the resolution of grievances and complaints and report on these in semi-annual reports to the EA and ADB. It may also recommend further measures for the redress of unresolved grievances. VII. RESETTLEMENT COSTS 100. Resettlement costs shall be included in the ADB loan package. 101. The RCS (Annex 5) conducted in 2010 provides a good reference in setting up the replacement cost rates for calculating the budget consistent with Safeguard Requirements 2. However, with after thorough consultation and reference to the new decree on land pricing, some adjustments were made to avoid sweeping costings and respect the details provided in the decree. However, these rates may be adjusted to reflect the current market rates during the updating of this RP. The unit rates adopted in this RP are set forth in Annex 1.

33 102. The resettlement costs are calculated based on the total costs for (i) compensation, (ii) allowances, and (iii) replacement cost of land, which include: (i) Administration and management of RP program represents 10% of the total of compensation and assistance. (ii) Share of external monitoring to RP administration and management is equivalent to 10% (iii) Services of the NGO for the conduct of DMS is 5% of RP administration and management (iv) Contingency: 12 15% 103. Excluded from the administrative, monitoring and contingency costs are the salaries of project staff who will assist in the updating and implementation of RP as they receive their salaries under the FDRMMP. 104. As summarized in Table 13, the estimated costs for RP implementation are estimated at LAK25,262,001,874.34 or about $3,157,750.23. Cost for land shall be added to the Project loan from ADB. MAF will ensure the timely provision of funds for RP and will meet any unforeseen obligations in excess of the resettlement budget in order to satisfy resettlement objectives. Detailed compensation including food allowances to APs is likewise shown in Annex 1. BUDGETED ITEMS UNIT Table 13. Summary of RP Budget TOTAL AREA/ NUMBER OF UNIT AHHS/ENTITIES LAO KIP IN $ ($1=8,000KIP) I. COMPENSATION FOR LAND m2 26,898.32 12,695,784,680.00 1,586,973.09 Affected Households m2 19,489.40 217 11,090,714,750.00 1,386,339.34 Private/Government Offices m2 3,571.40 10 920,048,000.00 115,006.00 Common Properties m2 3,837.52 12 685,021,930.00 85,627.74 II. COMPENSATION FOR STRUCTURES 3,980,358,900.00 497,544.86 Affected Households m2 182 1,738,408,400.00 217,301.05 Main structures m2 253.40 10 68,238,400.00 8,529.80 Secondary structures m2 468.00 3 107,920,000.00 13,490.00 Fence lm 4,770.00 159 1,550,250,000.00 193,781.25 Electric posts unit 10.00 10 12,000,000.00 1,500.00 Private/Government Offices 10 341,000,000.00 42,625.00 Fence lm 960.00 8 336,000,000.00 42,000.00 Electric posts unit 2 2 5,000,000.00 625.00 Common Properties 29 1,900,950,500.00 237,618.81 Fence lm 720.00 6 180,000,000.00 22,500.00 Irrigation Canals m 1,225.00 2 1,668,450,500.00 208,556.31 Electric posts unit 21 21 52,500,000.00 6,562.50 III. COMPENSATION FOR CROPS/TREES 514 86 88,430,000.00 11,053.75 Affected Households Tree/Crop 357 84 64,880,000.00 8,110.00 Common Properties Tree/Crop 157 2 23,550,000.00 2,943.75 IV. FOOD ASSISTANCE Pax 493 95 119,040,000.00 14,880.00 V. DISRUPTION OF BUSINESS AHHs 65 163,130,000.00 20,391.25 TOTAL COMPENSATION AND ASSISTANCE 17,046,743,580.00 2,130,842.95 VI. INCOME RESTORATION PROGRAM 532,730,000.00 66,591.25 VI. RP ADMINISTRATION Percent 0.10 1,704,674,358.00 213,084.29

34 RP Administration & Management Share 0.85 1,448,973,204.30 181,121.65 External Monitoring Share 0.10 170,467,435.80 21,308.43 Services of the NGO Share 0.05 85,233,717.90 10,654.21 OVERALL TOTAL 19,284,147,938.00 2,410,518.49 2,279,982,690.70 284,997.84 Contingency GRAND TOTAL 21,564,130,628.70 2,695,516.33 AH = Affected household, AP = Affected person, NGO = nongovernment organization VIII. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS A. Implementation Structure 1. Executing/Implementing Agencies 105. The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) will be the executing agency. In Lao PDR, MAF will delegate responsibility for the overall management and coordination to the Department of Irrigation (DOI) which will establish a National Project Coordination Office led by a national project coordinator in Vientiane. The implementing agencies will be Provincial Agricultural and Forestry Office, the Department of Waterways and the Department of Public Works and Transport of Vientiane Capital, and the Department of Meteorology and Hydrology for the National Early Warning Center in Vientiane. 106. The NPCO is the responsible ministerial authority for resettlement planning and implementation. As such, NPCO, through the PAFO-DAFO and DOW as IAs will oversee RP activities with WREA/MONRE providing technical assistance when necessary. IAs shall submit all subproject RPs to provincial counterparts for review and eventual submission to NPCO, to be forwarded to ADB for concurrence. 107. NPCO, with assistance from the IAs, will be responsible for overall planning, preparation and approval of subproject RPs, implementation and coordination of the proposed Project including the RPs. The NPCO will: (i) review and approve all subproject RPs submitted by the IAs; (ii) approve subproject RPs after obtaining concurrence from ADB; (iii) allocate necessary RP budget; (iv) periodically supervise RP implementation progress; (v) coordinate with other relevant central government agencies, and (vi) report these directly to ADB. A Safeguards unit will be attached to the NPCO to ensure that resettlement-related activities are properly planned, implemented and monitored. The designated Resettlement Officer of the Safeguards unit will be responsible for organizing the affected districts and villages to carry out the activities designated in this RP. 108. A Resettlement Officer each from the IA will be responsible for preparing subproject RPs. At the IA district level, a focal person shall be assigned each to work with the IA provincial Resettlement Officer who will be responsible for implementing and monitoring day-to-day activities including coordination with civil works schedule and financial management. Responsibilities of the provincial IA Resettlement Officer together with IA district focals are, but not limited to the following: (i) consultation with APs; (ii) carry out census, inventories of assets, socio-economic surveys; (iii) coordination with implementers, including contractors where they are used, on civil works schedule; (iv) coordination with various departments at the district and village levels (iv) assist APs in finding new replacement land; (v) prepare rehabilitation assistance to APs at village levels; and (vi) schedule resettlement activities and reporting

35 regularly to the NPC on progress and outstanding issues. To ensure that the preparation of subproject RPs is transparent and conducted in a participatory manner, the IA provincial Resettlement Officer and IA district focal persons will work closely with the APs and concerned local administrative/government authorities. 2. Resettlement Committees and Village Officials 109. Resettlement committees at provincial and district levels will be established to review and approve the subproject RPs submitted to PAFO and DOW for forwarding to the NPCO. The resettlement committees will also act as an advisor and will assess and monitor RP activities. They will also act as grievance officers. 110. The Provincial resettlement committee (PRC) and District resettlement committee (DRC) will include representatives of the concerned departments, local officials, village chiefs, AH representatives, women representatives, and mass organizations active in the Project area. The PRC will lead the RP preparation and implementation including: (i) undertaking consultation meetings together with DRCs; (ii) establishing compensation rates/replacement costs for affected assets; (iii) conducting, reviewing and confirming final DMS data; (iv) undertaking final agreement with APs on compensation; (v) managing funds disbursed from the Provincial department of finance for disbursement to APs; (vi) monitoring and reporting on all RP activities; and (vii) acting as grievance officers. The PRC will be supported by the DRCs which assistance from village taskforces. 111. The main responsibilities of the DRC will be to facilitate resettlement planning and implementation including: (i) conducting DMS, (ii) facilitating public information and consultation by ensuring villages and APs awareness at all stages of project planning and implementation; (iii) assisting in the identification of alternative residential land, rice field and garden for APs; (iv) facilitating the affected villagers for timely re-allocation of paddy land among households; (v) assisting affected villages to organize labors and other support for APs to remove and relocate their structures on site; (vi) assisting in the identification of special needs of vulnerable APs and providing timely assistance; (vii) assisting and participating in DMS and confirmation of the results; and (viii) providing first point of contact in the grievance mechanism, and recording all grievances. 112. The roles of the taskforce of village officials specifically at the village level, are to: (i) assist DRC to handle resettlement related work within the village; (ii) assist APs to organize labors to move and relocate their structures; (iii) reallocate village owned paddy land; (iv) allocate replacement residential land to relocating APs; and (v) provide a first-response to resolve emerging grievances. 113. There is a need for capacity building in resettlement planning for the implementing stakeholders expected to be involved and responsible for the final preparation and implementation of resettlement plans. Project Implementation Consultants based with NPCO shall provide the technical guidance to capacitate the EA/IA and local government units. Training on the Project specific resettlement procedures will be provided prior to the start of resettlement activities, such as basic principles of resettlement planning and the conceptual and legal (GOL) approach on entitlements for losses and restoration and rehabilitation of livelihoods. 3. Project Implementation Consultants 114. The Project Implementation Consultant (PIC) will include one international resettlement specialist and a national social development specialist to assist the EA, IA and local authorities in the preparation and implementation of the RP. The PIC resettlement specialists will assess the capacity of the implementing agencies and to provide the necessary capacity building on

36 safeguards for Government staff and the members of the PRC, DRC and village taskforces. The PIC will assist the local officials to carry out replacement cost survey for land and non-land assets. 4. Project Management Consultants 115. The Project Implementation Consultant (PIC) will include one international resettlement specialist and a team of national resettlement specialist/social development specialist to assist the EA, IA and local authorities in the preparation and implementation of the RP. The PIC resettlement specialists will assess the capacity of the implementing agencies and to provide the necessary capacity building on safeguards for Government staff and the members of the PRC, DRC and village taskforces. The PIC will assist the local officials to carry out replacement cost survey for land and non-land assets. B. Compensation Payment and Procedures 116. Following the release of budget from MAF, the NPCO assisted by District IAs will carry out the following tasks: (i) (ii) (iii) It will coordinate with village chiefs for posting the notice in public places in villages for information of the APs. The notice will include the required documents that the APs should bring, such as: (a) identification card, (b) copy of compensation form as agreed with DOI representative, and (c) copy of title or LURC. The compensation will be released to NPCO at least one week in advance prior to payment. During payment, the required funds should be carried out by the designated accounting staff of MAF, together with the representative staff of NPCO and District IAs. The AHs will sign acknowledgement receipt 117. Payment shall be made in public areas on the scheduled date and time. Payment shall be witnessed by village chiefs, civic organization like Women s Union, youth organization and/or NGO. The NPCO may also adopt payment through the government-designated bank. C. Temporary Impacts during Construction 118. It is possible that during the construction of the subproject the Contractor may need to acquire land temporarily. The contract for civil works will require that the Contractor will pay any damage incurred during construction. This will be built into the contract requirements as follows: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) The contractor will pay rent for any additional land required for working space and include a mechanism for payment to the owners of the land. To the extent possible, only vacant land will be used to avoid disruption of agricultural activities. If paddy land is rented, affected people will be entitled to compensation for un-harvested crops and/or opportunity lost during the temporary acquisition. Use of land will not disturb any business establishments/shops. Temporary use of land will be restored or improved in its pre-project condition. 119. External monitoring of construction activities shall also be conducted by EMA.

37 120. The results of the IOL, the budget and other information presented in this RP will be validated and finalized during updating of the RP through the conduct of a detailed measurement survey (DMS) following concurrence by GoL and ADB with this RP. Implementation of the RP will commence after NPCO receives concurrence from ADB. 121. The MAF through its NPMO, will not issue a notice-of-possession of site until the head of district resettlement committee confirms in writing that (i) payment has been fully disbursed to the affected persons and rehabilitation measures are in place as set out in the RP agreed between MAF and ADB; (ii) displaced persons are already compensated; and (iii) the area is free from any encumbrances. IX. MONITORING A. Internal Monitoring 122. The NPC Monitoring Unit (NPCMU) will serve as the Project Internal monitoring body. Semi-annual reports will be submitted to MAF starting from the commencement of RP preparation at the conduct of census, detailed measurement survey to completion of implementation of the RP activities. The NPCMU will include updates on resettlement in its regular progress reports to ADB. Internal monitoring and supervision will establish whether: (i) Compensation and/or other entitlements are provided as per Final RP, with no discrimination according to gender, ethnicity, vulnerability, or any other factor; (ii) Livelihood restoration measures are designed and implemented including modifications in the programs and provision of additional cash and in-kind assistance to the participating affected households as when necessary; (iii) Public information, public consultation and grievance redress procedures are followed; (iv) Capacity of APs to restore/re-establish livelihoods and living standards, including provision of special attention to severely affected and vulnerable households; (v) Affected public facilities and infrastructure are restored promptly; and (vi) The transition between relocation or site clearing and commencement of civil works is smooth and that sites are not handed over for civil works until affected households have been satisfactorily compensated, assisted or relocated as appropriate. A thematic attempt at classifying indicators is provided in Table 14. Type of Monitoring Budget and Time Frame Delivery of investment/s and Entitlements Consultation, Grievance and Special Issues Benefit Monitoring Table 14. Internal Monitoring Indicators Indicators Organized and functioning project implementation units. Capacity building activities undertaken across stakeholder groups. Provision of adequate budgetary support for compensation of APs and beneficiaries. Timely release and disbursement of equity funding for implementing the project. Timely social preparation. Agreements (with beneficiaries and APs) and concurrence (by the respective district and village authorities) to proposed investment/s. Appropriate and timely distribution/implementation of investments, compensation andentitlements to beneficiaries and APs Provision of special assistance been provided to vulnerable APs Provision of agreed transportation and food allowances to APs Implementation of income restoration packages Capacity building for women re desired/gender sensitive livelihood packages Disclosure of investment costs and compensation to beneficiaries and APs Periodic conduct of IEC and production/distribution of materials prepared Participation of beneficiaries and APs in planning and implementation Operationalization and outcomes of grievance and redress procedures Changes in patterns of income generation/occupation of beneficiaries compared to pre-project situation Changes in income and expenditures patterns compared to pre-project situation

38 Type of Monitoring Indicators Changes in lifestyle of beneficiaries and APs B. External Monitoring and Evaluation 123. The independent or external monitoring agency (EMA) will be an independent organization not involved in implementation of the Project with experience in resettlement monitoring and evaluation in Lao PDR. The main objective of external monitoring is to provide an independent periodic review and assessment of (i) achievement of resettlement objectives; (ii) changes in income, living standards and livelihoods; (iii) restoration and/or improvement of the economic and social base of the affected people; (iv) effectiveness and sustainability of entitlements; and (v) the need for further mitigation measures. The external monitor will be mobilized one month prior to commencement of DMS activities for any projects component. 124. The EMA will monitor compliance with ADB and Government requirements during implementation of resettlement. The main activities of the external monitor will include: (i) review of existing baseline data and collection of additional socio-economic information, as necessary, on samples of affected households; (ii) monitoring preparation and implementation of the RP; (iii) identification of any discrepancy between policy requirements and actual implementation of resettlement; (iv) monitoring the resolution of complaints and grievances of affected households; (v) providing recommendations for improving resettlement preparation and implementation including timely resolution of grievances; and (vi) assessment of existing capacity and resources of resettlement committees and local authorities, including project supervision consultants in terms of timing of mobilization, guidance provided and trainings carried out to the resettlement committees and local authorities during RP preparation and implementation. Semi annual reports will be submitted to EA and ADB. 125. EMA s confirmation of substantial compliance in implementing the RP be required with the EAs request to ADB for its Objection to issue the notice to proceed on civil works contracts, and subsequent the release of Project loan. X. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE 126. The results of the IOL, the budget and other information presented in this RP will be validated and finalized during updating of the RP through the conduct of a detailed measurement survey (DMS) following concurrence by GoL and ADB with this RP. Implementation of the RP will commence after NPCO receives concurrence from ADB. 127. The MAF/DOI through its NPCO, will not issue a notice-of-possession of site until the head of district resettlement committee confirms in writing that (i) payment has been fully disbursed to the affected persons and rehabilitation measures are in place as set out in the RP agreed between MAF/DOI and ADB; (ii) displaced persons are already compensated; and (iii) the area is free from any encumbrances. 128. Below is a schedule of resettlement-related activities for the project.

39 M o n t h s. Implementation Activities 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 I. LARP PREPARATION AND UPDATING 1 2 3 4 5 6 Demarcation of protection corridor based on detailed design Subproject disclosure, public meetings and consultations Conduct of DMS and SES Conduct of replacement cost survey Due diligence verifications of ownership on affected lands Processing the DMS data 7 Writing the draft final LARP 8 Confirmation with DPs on compensation and relocation options 9 10 11 Finalize the LARP Endorsement of LARP to WREA for review Review and approval of LARP by ADB II. LARP IMPLEMENTATION 12 Issuance of public notice on the implementation of LARP 13 14 15 Approval of budget for compensation, allowances and assistance Release of budget and disbursementd of payment to DPs Reorganization of houses and structures in remaining lands. 16 17 Resolution of grievance and redress filed by APs Internal Monitoring 18 External Monitoring - Compliance Monitoring and Evaluation III. POST LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT ACTIVITY 19 20 21 22 Publication of invitation to bid for civil works contract Evaluation of bidsand award of civil works contract Mobilization of equipment and hiring of workers Implementationt of subproject construction 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 ADB = Asian Development Bank, AP = affected person, DMS = detailed measurement survey, RP = resettlement plan, SES = socioeconomic survey.

40 ANNEXES

Annex 1 41 IOL Code Annex 1: Displaced Persons with 10% or more Impacts on their Lands Village Name of HH Head Area of land occupied (m²) Area of affected land (m²) Severity Total AHH Total Affected Pax 1 11-034 Khouydeng Boau 500.00 50.00 10.0% 1 4 2 11-026 Khouydeng Boun 400.00 40.00 10.0% 1 4 3 11-022 Khouydeng Phood 320.00 32.00 10.0% 1 2 4 12-014 Neua Khamdy 386.00 38.60 10.0% 1 4 5 12-025 Neua Thongla 800.00 80.00 10.0% 1 5 6 13-014 Tay Aochanh 290.00 29.00 10.0% 1 5 7 13-016 Tay Gnoudly 410.00 41.00 10.0% 1 7 8 4-005 Thamuang Visian 375.00 37.50 10.0% 1 7 9 3-001 Thanaleng Khammay 200.00 20.00 10.0% 1 4 10 5-018 Pava Ampaivanh 605.00 63.00 10.4% 1 5 11 4-006 Thamuang Duan 324.00 33.81 10.4% 1 5 12 8-015 Thapha Pomady 400.00 42.00 10.5% 1 5 13 11-002 Khouydeng Khammone 323.00 34.00 10.5% 1 5 14 13-004 Tay Sounlivone 414.00 46.00 11.1% 1 3 15 5-020 Pava Vinavon SOMSALOA 398.00 45.22 11.4% 1 5 16 9-020 Thinthane Tasoundanone 1,000.00 120.00 12.0% 1 4 17 5-004 Pava Vongphet 760.00 92.40 12.2% 1 3 18 5-005 Pava Somsavang 339.00 41.60 12.3% 1 2 19 13-021 Tay Chek 450.00 60.00 13.3% 1 6 20 13-009 Tay Huan 157.50 21.00 13.3% 1 5 21 1,010 ngheo Phonesavanh 24,766.50 3,344.00 13.5% 1 4 22 13-011 Tay Thai 299.60 43.00 14.4% 1 6 23 1,016 ngheo Tame (land owner in Vte) 3,000.00 480.00 16.0% 1 5 24 10-001 Parkpeng Poommady 172.00 28.00 16.3% 1 5 25 1,006 ngheo Khen SENGSOULIYA 369.00 63.54 17.2% 1 5 26 5-011 Pava Bounleard Pativong 249.00 43.40 17.4% 1 3 27 10-002 Parkpeng Hip 90.00 16.00 17.8% 1 4 28 14-017 Nalong Sananh 368.00 69.00 18.8% 1 5 29 12-020 Neua Tanh 150.00 30.00 20.0% 1 7

42 Annex 1 IOL Code Village Name of HH Head Area of land occupied (m²) Area of affected land (m²) Severity Total AHH Total Affected Pax 30 1,007 ngheo Benchamad Pearkeo 188.00 38.50 20.5% 1 2 31 12-005 Neua Thavone 435.00 101.50 23.3% 1 3 32 7-002 Thintom Khampauen 55.00 14.30 26.0% 1 6 Suphab (location of land owner 33 1,025 ngheo unknown) 4,800.00 1,280.00 26.7% 1 5 34 5-001 Pava Salieng 179.00 48.00 26.8% 1 8 35 1,008 ngheo Bounma Xayngalead 395.00 108.00 27.3% 1 4 Soudphaphone 36 2-005 Dongphosy 1,250.00 400.00 32.0% 1 3 37 1,020 ngheo Haem Phommachan (land owner in Vte) 1,250.00 400.00 32.0% 1 5 38 12-008 Neua Khampack 120.00 40.00 33.3% 1 5 39 1,005 ngheo Sounanh Phala 197.00 70.00 35.5% 1 2 40 5-009 Pava Kham 57.00 21.12 37.1% 1 6 41 5-014 Pava Chanhsamone 216.00 81.00 37.5% 1 3 42 5-006 Pava Vidavone 94.00 42.00 44.7% 1 5 43 1,027 ngheo Sengphet (land owner in Vte) 2,400.00 1,280.00 53.3% 1 5 44 1,001 ngheo Vanh Phala 188.00 107.50 57.2% 1 5 45 1,021 ngheo Koulab (location of land owner unknown) 750.00 480.00 64.0% 1 5 46 1,017 ngheo name (location of land owner unknown) 625.00 400.00 64.0% 1 5 47 1,019 ngheo uxai (land owner in Vte) 500.00 400.00 80.0% 1 5 48 1,022 ngheo Lee (land owner in Vte) 144.00 128.00 88.9% 1 5

Annex 2 43 1. LAND Annex 2: COMPENSATION BY IMPACT AND AFFECTED APs a. AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS IOL Code Village Name of HH Head Area of affected land (m²) Titled LURC State/ Community Unit Cost Cost for Land 1 2-007 Dongphosy Manivanh Thammavong 498.00 1 1,500,000.00 747,000,000 2 2-005 Dongphosy Soudphaphone 400.00 1 1,500,000.00 600,000,000 Assumptions/Comment 3 11-034 Khouydeng Boau 50.00 1 300,000.00 15,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 4 11-026 Khouydeng Boun 40.00 1 300,000.00 12,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 5 11-006 Khouydeng Bounteng 22.00 1 300,000.00 6,600,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 6 11-004 Khouydeng Buosyliphanh 36.00 1 300,000.00 10,800,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 7 11-016 Khouydeng Cheanda 49.20 1 300,000.00 14,760,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 8 11-018 Khouydeng Cheay 45.00 1 300,000.00 13,500,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 9 11-008 Khouydeng Keum Sensouck 24.00 1 300,000.00 7,200,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 10 11-003 Khouydeng Khamhphanh 27.00 1 300,000.00 8,100,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 11 11-002 Khouydeng Khammone 34.00 1 300,000.00 10,200,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 12 11-028 Khouydeng Ladhtana 168.00 1 300,000.00 50,400,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 13 11-024 Khouydeng Laung 134.00 1 300,000.00 40,200,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 14 11-030 Khouydeng Lear 14.00 1 300,000.00 4,200,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 15 11-036 Khouydeng Ly 22.00 1 300,000.00 6,600,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 16 11-010 Khouydeng O onnaxay 94.00 1 300,000.00 28,200,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 17 11-020 Khouydeng Phan 21.40 1 300,000.00 6,420,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 18 11-022 Khouydeng Phood 32.00 1 300,000 9,600,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 19 11-032 Khouydeng Seng 32.00 1 300,000 9,600,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 20 11-001 Khouydeng Somchan Thippaya 20.00 300,000 6,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 21 11-012 Khouydeng Somephone 63.00 1 300,000 18,900,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 22 11-014 Khouydeng Thong Oudomsi 75.00 1 300,000 22,500,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 23 14-007 Nalong Amphone 20.50 1 300,000 6,150,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 24 14-016 Nalong Khamhpheng 218.00 1 300,000 65,400,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 25 14-017 Nalong Sananh 69.00 1 300,000 20,700,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled

44 Annex 2 IOL Code Village Name of HH Head Area of affected land (m²) Titled LURC State/ Community Unit Cost Cost for Land 26 1,007 ngheo Benchamad Pearkeo 38.50 1 400,000 15,400,000 Assumptions/Comment 27 1,008 ngheo Bounma Xayngalead 108.00 1 300,000 32,400,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 28 1,020 ngheo Haem Phommachan (land owner 400.00 1 400,000 160,000,000 in Vte) 29 1,006 ngheo Khen SENGSOULIYA 63.54 1 400,000 25,416,000 30 1,021 ngheo Koulab (location of land owner 480.00 1 400,000 192,000,000 unknown) 31 1,022 ngheo Lee (land owner in Vte) 128.00 1 400,000 51,200,000 32 1,017 ngheo name (location of land owner 400.00 1 400,000 160,000,000 unknown) 33 1,019 ngheo uxai (land owner in Vte) 400.00 1 400,000 160,000,000 34 1,004 ngheo Phet (location of land owner unknown) 95.20 1 400,000 38,080,000 35 1,010 ngheo Phonesavanh 3,344.00 1 300,000 1,003,200,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 36 1,009 ngheo Seng Phitsakounkanh 46.50 1 400,000 18,600,000 37 1,027 ngheo Sengphet (land owner in Vte) 1,280.00 1 400,000 512,000,000 38 1,003 ngheo SisomePhone 180.00 1 300,000 54,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 39 1,005 ngheo Sounanh Phala 70.00 1 300,000 21,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 40 1,025 ngheo Suphab (location of land owner 1,280.00 1 400,000 512,000,000 unknown) 41 1,016 ngheo Tame (land owner in Vte) 480.00 1 400,000 192,000,000 42 1,002 ngheo Theo Vongduangchanh 147.50 1 400,000 59,000,000 43 1,001 ngheo Vanh Phala 107.50 1 400,000 43,000,000 44 10-005 Parkpeng Bee 10.00 1 1,500,000 15,000,000 45 10-002 Parkpeng Hip 16.00 1 1,500,000 24,000,000 46 10-003 Parkpeng Khamphong 8.00 1 1,500,000 12,000,000 47 10-007 Parkpeng Khen 14.00 1 1,500,000 21,000,000 48 10-001 Parkpeng Poommady 28.00 1 1,500,000 42,000,000 49 10-006 Parkpeng Soomkied 30.00 1 1,500,000 45,000,000 50 10-004 Parkpeng Suck 18.00 1 1,500,000 27,000,000 51 10-008 Parkpeng Udoon 14.00 1 1,500,000 21,000,000 52 5-018 Pava Ampaivanh 63.00 1 1,500,000 94,500,000

Annex 2 45 IOL Code Village Name of HH Head Area of affected land (m²) Titled LURC State/ Community Unit Cost Cost for Land 53 5-011 Pava Bounleard Pativong 43.40 1 1,500,000 65,100,000 54 5-014 Pava Chanhsamone 81.00 1 1,500,000 121,500,000 55 5-019 Pava Kai Sipakanhlanga 196.00 1 1,500,000 294,000,000 56 5-009 Pava Kham 21.12 1 1,500,000 31,680,000 57 5-017 Pava Khamsen 60.00 1 1,500,000 90,000,000 58 5-002 Pava Koun 49.00 1 1,500,000 73,500,000 59 5-015 Pava Lampon 84.00 1 1,500,000 126,000,000 60 5-010 Pava Laviengkhon (Restaurant) 70.40 1 1,500,000 105,600,000 61 5-016 Pava Phetsoulichanh 102.50 1 1,500,000 153,750,000 62 5-012 Pava Phonepasird 69.00 1 1,500,000 103,500,000 63 5-008 Pava Pooliem 28.00 1 1,500,000 42,000,000 64 5-001 Pava Salieng 48.00 1 1,500,000 72,000,000 65 5-007 Pava Shamli 42.00 1 1,500,000 63,000,000 66 5-013 Pava Sisavath 74.75 1 1,500,000 112,125,000 67 5-003 Pava Somsamai 36.00 1 1,500,000 54,000,000 68 5-005 Pava Somsavang 41.60 1 1,500,000 62,400,000 69 5-006 Pava Vidavone 42.00 1 1,500,000 63,000,000 70 5-020 Pava Vinavon SOMSALOA 45.22 1 1,500,000 67,830,000 71 5-004 Pava Vongphet 92.40 1 1,500,000 138,600,000 Assumptions/Comment 72 12-024 Neua Aong 8.50 1 300,000 2,550,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 73 12-011 Neua Champa 50.00 1 300,000 15,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 74 12-009 Neua Gnuad 52.00 1 300,000 15,600,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 75 12-019 Neua In 50.00 1 300,000 15,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 76 12-023 Neua Inphenh 16.00 1 300,000 4,800,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 77 12-004 Neua Kenchanh 142.00 1 300,000 42,600,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 78 12-014 Neua Khamdy 38.60 1 300,000 11,580,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 79 12-008 Neua Khampack 40.00 1 300,000 12,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 80 12-013 Neua Ko (Kouson) 60.00 1 300,000 18,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 81 12-017 Neua KongKham 18.00 1 300,000 5,400,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled

46 Annex 2 IOL Code Village Name of HH Head Area of affected land (m²) Titled LURC State/ Community Unit Cost Cost for Land Assumptions/Comment 82 12-015 Neua Lead 19.00 1 300,000 5,700,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 83 12-018 Neua Leng 64.00 1 300,000 19,200,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 84 12-012 Neua Lid 45.00 1 300,000 13,500,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 85 12-007 Neua Ouma 44.00 1 300,000 13,200,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 86 12-006 Neua Outhen 37.00 1 300,000 11,100,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 87 12-002 Neua Sathiang 63.00 1 300,000 18,900,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 88 12-003 Neua Sioudom 14.00 1 300,000 4,200,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 89 12-022 Neua Somdy 36.00 1 300,000 10,800,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 90 12-010 Neua Soukanh 33.00 1 300,000 9,900,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 91 12-020 Neua Tanh 30.00 1 300,000 9,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 92 12-005 Neua Thavone 101.50 1 300,000 30,450,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 93 12-016 Neua Thongkhoun 19.00 1 300,000 5,700,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 94 12-025 Neua Thongla 80.00 1 300,000 24,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 95 12-021 Neua Touy 78.00 1 300,000 23,400,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 96 12-001 Neua Vhand 36.00 1 300,000 10,800,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 97 13-014 Tay Aochanh 29.00 1 300,000 8,700,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 98 13-044 Tay Aoumh 16.00 1 300,000 4,800,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 99 13-056 Tay Aoun 272.00 1 300,000 81,600,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 100 13-062 Tay Bai 40.00 1 300,000 12,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 101 13-020 Tay Banh 59.00 1 300,000 17,700,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 102 13-063 Tay Bonh 104.00 1 300,000 31,200,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 103 13-053 Tay Boun 152.00 1 300,000 45,600,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 104 13-057 Tay Boun 73.00 1 300,000 21,900,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 105 13-059 Tay Bounchanh 214.00 1 300,000 64,200,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 106 13-047 Tay Bounfoun 80.00 1 300,000 24,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 107 13-046 Tay Bounsy 65.00 1 300,000 19,500,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 108 13-025 Tay Buapha 140.00 1 300,000 42,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 109 13-038 Tay Chanh 30.00 1 300,000 9,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 110 13-024 Tay Chanh 18.00 1 300,000 5,400,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 111 13-026 Tay Chanhchid 23.00 1 300,000 6,900,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled

Annex 2 47 IOL Code Village Name of HH Head Area of affected land (m²) Titled LURC State/ Community Unit Cost Cost for Land Assumptions/Comment 112 13-017 Tay Chanhsoa 59.00 1 300,000 17,700,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 113 13-058 Tay Chanhsoa 58.00 1 300,000 17,400,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 114 13-052 Tay Chanhthala 65.00 1 300,000 19,500,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 115 13-021 Tay Chek 60.00 1 300,000 18,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 116 13-006 Tay Deng 27.00 1 300,000 8,100,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 117 13-016 Tay Gnoudly 41.00 1 300,000 12,300,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 118 13-009 Tay Huan 21.00 1 300,000 6,300,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 119 13-019 Tay Huay 18.00 1 300,000 5,400,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 120 13-033 Tay Khamphanh 18.50 1 300,000 5,550,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 121 13-039 Tay Khoun 57.00 1 300,000 17,100,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 122 13-048 Tay Khoun 66.00 1 300,000 19,800,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 123 13-012 Tay Kongsi 19.00 1 300,000 5,700,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 124 13-010 Tay Ladhsadi 17.00 1 300,000 5,100,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 125 13-036 Tay Lear 33.00 1 300,000 9,900,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 126 13-037 Tay Lear 28.00 1 300,000 8,400,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 127 13-060 Tay Lear 118.00 1 300,000 35,400,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 128 13-027 Tay Ly 42.00 1 300,000 12,600,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 129 13-028 Tay Moa 38.00 1 300,000 11,400,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 130 13-002 Tay Mong 18.00 1 300,000 5,400,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 131 13-051 Tay y 50.00 1 300,000 15,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 132 13-013 Tay Pheng 12.00 1 300,000 3,600,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 133 13-041 Tay Pheng 60.00 1 300,000 18,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 134 13-003 Tay Pheng(Sinpheang) 18.00 1 300,000 5,400,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 135 13-001 Tay Piek 18.00 1 300,000 5,400,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 136 13-018 Tay Po 17.50 1 300,000 5,250,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 137 13-032 Tay Pod 13.00 1 300,000 3,900,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 138 13-045 Tay Poo 120.00 1 300,000 36,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 139 13-049 Tay Poud 104.00 1 300,000 31,200,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 140 13-050 Tay Sanh 306.00 1 300,000 91,800,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled

48 Annex 2 IOL Code Village Name of HH Head Area of affected land (m²) Titled LURC State/ Community Unit Cost Cost for Land Assumptions/Comment 141 13-005 Tay Sathain 40.00 1 300,000 12,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 142 13-007 Tay Seng 38.00 1 300,000 11,400,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 143 13-042 Tay Som 36.00 1 300,000 10,800,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 144 13-040 Tay Somsay 100.00 1 300,000 30,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 145 13-022 Tay Sone 21.00 1 300,000 6,300,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 146 13-004 Tay Sounlivone 46.00 1 300,000 13,800,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 147 13-061 Tay Souphap 142.00 1 300,000 42,600,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 148 13-054 Tay Suan 105.00 1 300,000 31,500,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 149 13-011 Tay Thai 43.00 1 300,000 12,900,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 150 13-029 Tay Thai 18.50 1 300,000 5,550,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 151 13-031 Tay Thai 26.00 1 300,000 7,800,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 152 13-055 Tay Thai 212.00 1 300,000 63,600,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 153 13-008 Tay Thi 20.00 1 300,000 6,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 154 13-035 Tay Tieng 140.00 1 300,000 42,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 155 13-023 Tay Toa 15.50 1 300,000 4,650,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 156 13-034 Tay Veuan 57.00 1 300,000 17,100,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 157 6-002 Thadeua Kham 1 1,500,000-158 6-001 Thadeua Medam 12.00 1 1,500,000 18,000,000 159 6-004 Thadeua mephad (Vimala) 11.00 1 1,500,000 16,500,000 160 6-003 Thadeua Saman Mahachan 1 1,500,000-161 6-005 Thadeua Souni 7.00 1 1,500,000 10,500,000 162 6-006 Thadeua Soupi 16.30 1 1,500,000 24,450,000 163 4-003 Thamuang Bounhieng 4.50 1,500,000 6,750,000 164 4-004 Thamuang Bounngeua 13.50 1,500,000 20,250,000 165 4-007 Thamuang Chanhthaly 1 1,500,000-166 4-006 Thamuang Duan 33.81 1,500,000 50,715,000 167 4-010 Thamuang Outama 14.85 1,500,000 22,275,000 168 4-002 Thamuang Samphanh 33.00 1,500,000 49,500,000 169 4-008 Thamuang Soulaxay Keomala 8.70 1,500,000 13,050,000

Annex 2 49 IOL Code Village Name of HH Head Area of affected land (m²) Titled LURC State/ Community Unit Cost Cost for Land 170 4-001 Thamuang Sounanh 33.00 1,500,000 49,500,000 171 4-009 Thamuang Viengvilay 11.25 1,500,000 16,875,000 172 4-005 Thamuang Visian 37.50 1,500,000 56,250,000 173 3-010 Thanaleng Bangaon 15.00 1 1,500,000 22,500,000 174 3-007 Thanaleng Chanhpheng 18.00 1 1,500,000 27,000,000 Assumptions/Comment 175 3-001 Thanaleng Khammay 20.00 1 1,125,000 22,500,000 1,125,000 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 176 3-008 Thanaleng Khampoud 4.50 1 1,500,000 6,750,000 177 3-002 Thanaleng Ladtanaphone 13.00 1 1,500,000 19,500,000 178 3-003 Thanaleng Mock 24.00 1 1,125,000 27,000,000 1,125,000 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 179 3-006 Thanaleng Pheng 16.00 1 1,500,000 24,000,000 180 3-004 Thanaleng Sidtiphong 8.00 1 1,500,000 12,000,000 181 3-005 Thanaleng Southep 16.00 1 1,500,000 24,000,000 182 3-009 Thanaleng Tuy 14.30 1 1,500,000 21,450,000 183 8-010 Thapha Arnoy 20.00 1 1,500,000 30,000,000 184 8-003 Thapha Berm 20.00 1 1,500,000 30,000,000 185 8-011 Thapha Bountanh 36.00 1 1,500,000 54,000,000 186 8-016 Thapha Bountom 15.00 1,125,000 16,875,000 1,125,000 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 187 8-008 Thapha Keo - 188 8-013 Thapha Keovanhnapom 30.00 1 1,500,000 45,000,000 189 8-004 Thapha Khamphone 20.00 1 1,500,000 30,000,000 190 8-009 Thapha Moopoun 20.00 1,125,000 22,500,000 1,125,000 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 191 8-006 Thapha Ngoud 20.00 1 1,500,000 30,000,000 192 8-015 Thapha Pomady 42.00-1,125,000 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 193 8-001 Thapha Samnaun 17.00 1 1,500,000 25,500,000 194 8-002 Thapha Sombang 106.00 1 1,500,000 159,000,000 195 8-014 Thapha Somphone 12.00 1,125,000 13,500,000 1,125,000 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 196 8-012 Thapha Soon 24.00 1 1,500,000 36,000,000 197 8-005 Thapha Souphab 30.00 1,125,000 33,750,000 1,125,000 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 198 8-008 Thapha Tha 28.00 1,125,000 31,500,000 1,125,000 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled

50 Annex 2 IOL Code Village Name of HH Head Area of affected land (m²) Titled LURC State/ Community Unit Cost Cost for Land 199 9-001 Thinthane Aar 23.00 1 1,500,000 34,500,000 200 9-008 Thinthane Amin 20.00 1 1,500,000 30,000,000 201 9-004 Thinthane Bay 15.00 1 1,500,000 22,500,000 202 9-010 Thinthane Boun Kidtivong 80.00 1 1,500,000 120,000,000 203 9-015 Thinthane Bounchamh 37.50 1 1,500,000 56,250,000 Assumptions/Comment 204 9-016 Thinthane ChanhKham 15.00 1 1,125,000 16,875,000 1,125,000 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 205 9-011 Thinthane Ken Vongphachanh 80.00 1 1,500,000 120,000,000 206 9-003 Thinthane Leokham 36.00 1 1,500,000 54,000,000 207 9-018 Thinthane Ohy 40.00 1 1,500,000 60,000,000 208 9-009 Thinthane Siphon 15.00 1 1,500,000 22,500,000 209 9-017 Thinthane Song 15.00 1 1,500,000 22,500,000 210 9-005 Thinthane Soon 24.00 1 1,125,000 27,000,000 1,125,000 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 211 9-016 Thinthane Soukhampadh 45.00 1 1,125,000 50,625,000 1,125,000 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 212 9-002 Thinthane Sumnain 9.00 1 1,500,000 13,500,000 213 9-020 Thinthane Tasoundanone 120.00 1 1,500,000 180,000,000 214 9-012 Thinthane Thongkhoun 120.00 1 1,500,000 180,000,000 215 9-021 Thinthane Thongkhoun 29.75 1 1,125,000 33,468,750 1,125,000 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 216 9-007 Thinthane Vathsana 20.00 1 1,500,000 30,000,000 217 9-019 Thinthane Veng 36.00 1 1,500,000 54,000,000 218 9-014 Thinthane Viengxay 45.00 1 1,500,000 67,500,000 219 7-002 Thintom Khampauen 14.30 1 1,500,000 21,450,000 220 7-001 Thintom Somesack 56.11 1 1,500,000 84,165,000 221 7-004 Thintom Soutap 4.20 1 1,500,000 6,300,000 222 7-003 Thintom Teo sangbausy 8.50 1 1,500,000 12,750,000 te Some Households had more than 1 parcel; all affected

Annex 2 51 IOL Code b. ESTABLISHMENTS Village Name of HH Head Area of affected land (m²) Titled LURC State/ Community 1 2-002 Dongphosy Fuel store.2 (state land) 300.00 1 80,000 24,000,000 Former private Company (state 2 2-003 Dongphosy land) 480.00 1 80,000 38,400,000 Unit Cost Cost Comment / Assumptions Using result of RCS for state/public lands marking up to 2012 levels Using result of RCS for state/public lands marking up to 2012 levels 3 1,014 ngheo Former private factory 71.40 1 300,000 21,420,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled Lao PepSi Company (state 4 1,015 ngheo enterprise) 55.00 1 300,000 16,500,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 5 1,011 ngheo Oil storage. 5 of Army 1,200.00 1 300,000 360,000,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 6 1,023 ngheo Regulator 160.00 1 400,000 64,000,000 7 1,024 ngheo Tower (TICO company) 48.00 1 400,000 19,200,000 Seeding Nursely Station (Govt 8 1,012 ngheo Org) 1,232.00 1 300,000 369,600,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled Fork Fay Private company 9 1,013 ngheo (state Land) 15.40 1 400,000 6,160,000 10 5-021 Pava District Army Office 9.60 1 80,000 768,000 Using result of RCS for state/public lands marking up to 2012 levels IOL Code c. COMMON PROPERTIES Village Name of HH Head Area of affected land (m²) Titled LURC State/ Community Unit Cost Cost for Land 1 2-001 Dongphosy Cultural park (state land) 2,400.00 1 80,000 192,000,000 Village youth garden 2 2-004 Dongphosy (community land) 480.00 1 80,000 38,400,000 3 2-006 Dongphosy Friendship Bridge Border 220.00 1 80,000 17,600,000 Comment / Assumptions Using result of RCS for state/public lands marking up to 2012 levels Using result of RCS for state/public lands marking up to 2012 levels Using result of RCS for state/public lands marking up to 2012 levels 4 11-038 Khouydeng Khouydeng Temple 116.00 1 300,000 34,800,000 300,000.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 5 1,018 ngheo ngheo village Land 330.00 1 300,001 99,000,330 300,001.00 assumes LURCs are priced 75% of titled 6 5-022 Pava Pava Market (community land) 51.52 1 80,000 4,121,600 Using result of RCS for state/public lands marking up to 2012 levels

52 Annex 2 7 5-023 Pava eletricity posts (public asset) total 21 units - 1 80,000-8 9-013 Thinthane Primary School of Thinthane 120.00 80,000 9,600,000 Using result of RCS for state/public lands marking up to 2012 levels Using result of RCS for state/public lands marking up to 2012 levels 9 9-022 Thinthane Thinthane Temple 120.00 1 1,500,000 180,000,000 10 7-005 Thintom Phonsavang-Thintom Temple 73.00 1 1,500,000 109,500,000

Annex 2 53 IOL Code 2. STRUCTURES a. AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS Village Name of HH Head Aff Area of Main Structure Unit Cost Cost Aff Area of Sec Struc Unit Cost Cost Elec Poles Unit Cost Cost Fence Lm Unit Cost 1 2-005 Dongphosy Soudphaphone 400.00 246,000.00 98,400,000.00 98,400,000.00 2 11-034 Khouydeng Boau 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 3 11-026 Khouydeng Boun 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 4 11-006 Khouydeng Bounteng 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 5 11-004 Khouydeng Buosyliphanh 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 6 11-016 Khouydeng Cheanda 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 7 11-018 Khouydeng Cheay 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 8 11-008 Khouydeng Keum Sensouck 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 9 11-003 Khouydeng Khamhphanh 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 10 11-002 Khouydeng Khammone 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 11 11-028 Khouydeng Ladhtana 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 12 11-024 Khouydeng Laung 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 13 11-030 Khouydeng Lear 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 14 11-036 Khouydeng Ly 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 15 11-010 Khouydeng O onnaxay 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 16 11-020 Khouydeng Phan 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 17 11-022 Khouydeng Phood 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 18 11-032 Khouydeng Seng 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 19 11-001 Khouydeng Somchan Thippaya 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 20 11-012 Khouydeng Somephone 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 21 11-014 Khouydeng Thong Oudomsi 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 22 14-016 Nalong Khamhpheng 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 23 1,007 ngheo Benchamad 21.00 5,166,000.00 5,166,000.00 Pearkeo 246,000.00 24 1,008 ngheo Bounma 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 Xayngalead 25 1,020 ngheo Haem Phommachan 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 Cost Total Cost

54 Annex 2 IOL Code Village Name of HH Head Aff Area of Main Structure (land owner in Vte) 26 1,006 ngheo Khen SENGSOULIYA 27 1,021 ngheo Koulab (location of land owner unknown) 28 1,017 ngheo name (location of land owner unknown) 29 1,019 ngheo uxai (land owner in Vte) 30 1,004 ngheo Phet (location of land owner unknown) Unit Cost Cost Aff Area of Sec Struc Unit Cost Cost Elec Poles 1 Unit Cost Cost Fence Lm Unit Cost 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 Cost Total Cost 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 10,950,000.00 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 31 1,010 ngheo Phonesavanh 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 32 1,009 ngheo Seng Phitsakounkanh 46.50 246,000.00 11,439,000.00 11,439,000.00 33 1,003 ngheo SisomePhone 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 34 1,005 ngheo Sounanh Phala 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 35 1,025 ngheo Suphab (location 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 of land owner unknown) 36 1,016 ngheo Tame (land owner 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 in Vte) 37 1,002 ngheo Theo 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 Vongduangchanh 38 1,001 ngheo Vanh Phala 18.90 246,000.00 4,649,400.00 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 14,399,400.00 39 10-005 Parkpeng Bee 36.00 140,000.00 5,040,000.00 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 14,790,000.00 40 10-002 Parkpeng Hip 32.00 140,000.00 4,480,000.00 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 14,230,000.00 41 10-003 Parkpeng Khamphong 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 42 10-007 Parkpeng Khen - 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 43 10-001 Parkpeng Poommady 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 44 10-006 Parkpeng Soomkied 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 45 10-004 Parkpeng Suck 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00

Annex 2 55 IOL Code Village Name of HH Head Aff Area of Main Structure Unit Cost Cost Aff Area of Sec Struc Unit Cost Cost Elec Poles Unit Cost Cost Fence Lm Unit Cost 46 10-008 Parkpeng Udoon 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 47 5-018 Pava Ampaivanh 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 48 5-019 Pava Kai 34.00 140,000.00 4,760,000.00 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 14,510,000.00 Sipakanhlanga 49 5-017 Pava Khamsen 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 50 5-015 Pava Lampon 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 51 5-010 Pava Laviengkhon (Restaurant) 70.40 400,000 8,160,000.00 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 37,910,000.00 52 5-016 Pava Phetsoulichanh 1 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 10,950,000.00 53 5-012 Pava Phonepasird 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 54 5-008 Pava Pooliem 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 55 5-001 Pava Salieng 12.00 2,952,000.00 2,952,000.00 246,000.00 56 5-013 Pava Sisavath 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 57 5-003 Pava Somsamai 1 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 10,950,000.00 58 5-005 Pava Somsavang 12.60 1,764,000.00 1,764,000.00 140,000.00 59 5-020 Pava Vinavon 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 SOMSALOA 60 12-024 Neua Aong 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 61 12-011 Neua Champa 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 62 12-009 Neua Gnuad 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 63 12-023 Neua Inphenh 6.00 1,476,000.00 1,476,000.00 246,000.00 64 12-004 Neua Kenchanh 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 65 12-013 Neua Ko (Kouson) 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 66 12-017 Neua KongKham 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 67 12-015 Neua Lead 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 68 12-018 Neua Leng 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 69 12-012 Neua Lid 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 70 12-007 Neua Ouma 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 Cost Total Cost

56 Annex 2 IOL Code Village Name of HH Head Aff Area of Main Structure Unit Cost Cost Aff Area of Sec Struc Unit Cost Cost Elec Poles Unit Cost Cost Fence Lm Unit Cost 71 12-006 Neua Outhen 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 72 12-002 Neua Sathiang 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 73 12-003 Neua Sioudom 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 74 12-022 Neua Somdy 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 75 12-010 Neua Soukanh 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 76 12-020 Neua Tanh 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 77 12-005 Neua Thavone 1 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 78 12-016 Neua Thongkhoun 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 79 12-025 Neua Thongla 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 80 12-021 Neua Touy 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 81 12-001 Neua Vhand 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 82 13-014 Tay Aochanh 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 83 13-044 Tay Aoumh - 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 84 13-056 Tay Aoun 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 85 13-062 Tay Bai 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 86 13-020 Tay Banh - 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 87 13-063 Tay Bonh 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 88 13-053 Tay Boun 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 89 13-057 Tay Boun 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 90 13-059 Tay Bounchanh 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 91 13-047 Tay Bounfoun 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 92 13-046 Tay Bounsy 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 93 13-025 Tay Buapha 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 94 13-038 Tay Chanh 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 95 13-024 Tay Chanh 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 96 13-026 Tay Chanhchid 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 97 13-017 Tay Chanhsoa 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 98 13-058 Tay Chanhsoa 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 99 13-052 Tay Chanhthala - 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 Cost Total Cost

Annex 2 57 IOL Code Village Name of HH Head Aff Area of Main Structure Unit Cost Cost Aff Area of Sec Struc Unit Cost Cost Elec Poles Unit Cost Cost Fence Lm Unit Cost 100 13-021 Tay Chek 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 101 13-016 Tay Gnoudly 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 102 13-009 Tay Huan 1 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 10,950,000.00 103 13-019 Tay Huay - 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 104 13-033 Tay Khamphanh - 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 105 13-039 Tay Khoun - 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 105 13-048 Tay Khoun - 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 106 13-012 Tay Kongsi - 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 107 13-010 Tay Ladhsadi 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 108 13-036 Tay Lear - 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 108 13-037 Tay Lear 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 108 13-060 Tay Lear 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 109 13-027 Tay Ly 1 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 10,950,000.00 110 13-028 Tay Moa 1 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 10,950,000.00 111 13-002 Tay Mong 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 112 13-051 Tay y - 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 113 13-013 Tay Pheng 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 113 13-041 Tay Pheng 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 114 13-003 Tay Pheng(Sinpheang) 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 115 13-001 Tay Piek 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 116 13-018 Tay Po - 1 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 10,950,000.00 117 13-032 Tay Pod - 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 118 13-045 Tay Poo 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 119 13-049 Tay Poud 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 120 13-050 Tay Sanh 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 121 13-005 Tay Sathain 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 122 13-007 Tay Seng 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 123 13-042 Tay Som 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 124 13-040 Tay Somsay 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 Cost Total Cost

58 Annex 2 IOL Code Village Name of HH Head Aff Area of Main Structure Unit Cost Cost Aff Area of Sec Struc Unit Cost Cost Elec Poles Unit Cost Cost Fence Lm Unit Cost 125 13-022 Tay Sone - 1 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 10,950,000.00 126 13-061 Tay Souphap 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 127 13-054 Tay Suan 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 128 13-011 Tay Thai 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 129 13-029 Tay Thai - 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 129 13-031 Tay Thai 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 130 13-055 Tay Thai 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 131 13-008 Tay Thi 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 132 13-035 Tay Tieng 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 133 13-023 Tay Toa - 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 134 13-034 Tay Veuan 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 135 6-002 Thadeua Kham 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 136 6-004 Thadeua mephad (Vimala) 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 137 6-003 Thadeua Saman Mahachan 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 138 8-003 Thapha Berm 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 139 8-011 Thapha Bountanh 24.00 246,000.00 5,904,000.00 5,904,000.00 140 8-016 Thapha Bountom 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 141 8-013 Thapha Keovanhnapom 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 142 8-009 Thapha Moopoun 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 143 8-006 Thapha Ngoud 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 144 8-002 Thapha Sombang 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 145 8-014 Thapha Somphone 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 146 9-001 Thinthane Aar 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 147 9-008 Thinthane Amin 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 148 9-004 Thinthane Bay 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 149 9-015 Thinthane Bounchamh 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 150 9-016 Thinthane ChanhKham 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 151 9-018 Thinthane Ohy 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 152 9-017 Thinthane Song 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 Cost Total Cost

Annex 2 59 IOL Code Village Name of HH Head Aff Area of Main Structure Unit Cost Cost Aff Area of Sec Struc Unit Cost Cost Elec Poles Unit Cost Cost Fence Lm Unit Cost 153 9-005 Thinthane Soon 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 154 9-016 Thinthane Soukhampadh 1 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 10,950,000.00 155 9-020 Thinthane Tasoundanone 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 156 9-012 Thinthane Thongkhoun 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 157 9-007 Thinthane Vathsana 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 158 9-019 Thinthane Veng 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 159 9-014 Thinthane Viengxay 8.00 246,000.00 1,968,000.00 1,968,000.00 160 7-002 Thintom Khampauen 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 161 7-001 Thintom Somesack 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 162 7-004 Thintom Soutap 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 163 7-003 Thintom Teo sangbausy 1 30 325,000 9,750,000 9,750,000.00 Cost Total Cost b. ESTABLISHMENTS FENCE AND ELECTRIC POLES (Fences averaged by survey enumerators) IOL Code Elec Village Name of HH Head Poles Unit Cost Cost Fence Lm Unit Cost Cost Total Cost 1 2-002 Dongphosy Fuel store.2 (state land) 2 2-003 Dongphosy Former private Company (state land) 3 1,014 ngheo Former private factory 1 120 350,000 42,000,000 42,000,000.00 4 1,015 ngheo Lao PepSi Company (state enterprise) 1 120 350,000 42,000,000 42,000,000.00 5 1,011 ngheo Oil storage. 5 of Army 1 120 350,000 42,000,000 42,000,000.00 6 1,023 ngheo Regulator 1 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 1 120 350,000 42,000,000 44,500,000.00 7 1,024 ngheo Tower (TICO company) 1 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 1 120 350,000 42,000,000 44,500,000.00 8 1,012 ngheo Seeding Nursely Station (Govt Org) 1 120 350,000 42,000,000 42,000,000.00 9 1,013 ngheo Fork Fay Private company (state Land) 1 120 350,000 42,000,000 42,000,000.00 10 5-021 Pava District Army Office 1 120 350,000 42,000,000 42,000,000.00

60 Annex 2 c. COMMON PROPERTY OTHER STRUCTURES, FENCE AND ELECTRIC POLES (Fences averaged by survey enumerators) IOL Code Village Name of HH Head 1 2-001 Dongphosy Cultural park (state land) Village youth garden (community 2 2-004 Dongphosy land) 3 2-006 Dongphosy Friendship Bridge Border Aff Area of Main Structure Unit Cost Cost Elec Poles Unit Cost Cost Fence Lm Unit Cost Cost Cost for Other structures 4 11-038 Khouydeng Khouydeng Temple 1 120 250,000 30,000,000 30,000,000.00 5 1,018 ngheo ngheo village Land 1 120 250,000 30,000,000 30,000,000.00 6 Nalong Secondary irrigation canal (m) 725.00 1,362,000.00 987,450,000.00-7 Tay Main irrigaiton canal (m) 500.00 1,362,001.00 681,000,500.00-8 5-022 Pava Pava Market (community land) 1 120 250,000 30,000,000 30,000,000.00 eletricity posts (public asset) total 21 9 5-023 Pava units 21 2,500,000.00 52,500,000.00 52,500,000.00 10 9-013 Thinthane Primary School of Thinthane 1 120 250,000 30,000,000 30,000,000.00 11 9-022 Thinthane Thinthane Temple 1 120 250,000 30,000,000 30,000,000.00 12 7-005 Thintom Phonsavang-Thintom Temple 1 120 250,000 30,000,000 30,000,000.00

Annex 2 61 3. TREES a. AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS (For unidentified species, used mid-range costs; mango assumed same as coconut for lack of basis) IOL Code Village Name of HH TREES Type Unit Cost Cost 1 2-007 Dongphosy Manivanh Thammavong 1 25 150,000.00 3,750,000.00 2 11-026 Khouydeng Boun 1 3 150,000.00 450,000.00 3 11-006 Khouydeng Bounteng 1 3 150,000.00 450,000.00 4 11-016 Khouydeng Cheanda 1 6 150,000.00 900,000.00 5 11-018 Khouydeng Cheay 1 9 150,000.00 1,350,000.00 6 11-008 Khouydeng Keum Sensouck 1 1 150,000.00 150,000.00 7 11-003 Khouydeng Khamhphanh 1 1 150,000.00 150,000.00 8 11-002 Khouydeng Khammone 1 2 150,000.00 300,000.00 9 11-028 Khouydeng Ladhtana 1 8 150,000.00 1,200,000.00 10 11-024 Khouydeng Laung 1 4 150,000.00 600,000.00 11 11-010 Khouydeng O onnaxay 1 5 150,000.00 750,000.00 12 11-020 Khouydeng Phan 1 8 150,000.00 1,200,000.00 13 11-001 Khouydeng Somchan Thippaya 1 1 150,000.00 150,000.00 14 11-012 Khouydeng Somephone 1 5 150,000.00 750,000.00 15 11-014 Khouydeng Thong Oudomsi 1 11 150,000.00 1,650,000.00 16 1007 ngheo Benchamad Pearkeo 1 2 Mango 300,000.00 600,000.00 17 1020 ngheo Haem Phommachan (Land owner stay in Beungkha Yong-Vte. city) 1 2 150,000.00 300,000.00 18 1006 ngheo Khen SENGSOULIYA 1 6 Coconut 300,000.00 1,800,000.00 19 1021 ngheo Koulab (do not know where is land owner staying) 1 4 150,000.00 600,000.00 20 1022 ngheo Lee (land owner stay in city) 1 2 150,000.00 300,000.00 21 1017 ngheo name (no body know where is land owner staying) 1 1 150,000.00 150,000.00 22 1003 ngheo SisomePhone 1 5 Mango 300,000.00 1,500,000.00 23 1025 ngheo Suphab (do not know where is land owner staying) 1 1 150,000.00 150,000.00 24 1016 ngheo Tame (land owner stay in Vte. City) 1 2 Mango 300,000.00 600,000.00 25 10-007 Parkpeng Khen 1 3 150,000.00 450,000.00 26 5-002 Pava Koun 1 2 150,000.00 300,000.00

62 Annex 2 IOL Code Village Name of HH TREES Type Unit Cost Cost 27 5-004 Pava Vongphet 1 1 150,000.00 150,000.00 28 12-024 Neua Aong 1 4 150,000.00 600,000.00 29 12-011 Neua Champa 1 8 Mango 300,000.00 2,400,000.00 30 12-023 Neua Inphenh 1 1 150,000.00 150,000.00 31 12-004 Neua Kenchanh 1 9 150,000.00 1,350,000.00 32 12-013 Neua Ko (Kouson) 1 5 150,000.00 750,000.00 33 12-012 Neua Lid 1 4 Mango 300,000.00 1,200,000.00 34 12-006 Neua Outhen 1 3 150,000.00 450,000.00 35 12-002 Neua Sathiang 1 1 150,000.00 150,000.00 36 12-022 Neua Somdy 1 3 150,000.00 450,000.00 37 12-010 Neua Soukanh 1 5 Mango 300,000.00 1,500,000.00 38 12-005 Neua Thavone 1 1 Coconut 300,000.00 300,000.00 39 12-016 Neua Thongkhoun 1 6 Longan 120,000.00 720,000.00 40 12-021 Neua Touy 1 3 150,000.00 450,000.00 41 12-001 Neua Vhand 1 27 150,000.00 4,050,000.00 42 13-014 Tay Aochanh 1 2 150,000.00 300,000.00 43 13-044 Tay Aoumh 1 1 Tamarind 150,000.00 150,000.00 44 13-020 Tay Banh 1 8 Coconut 300,000.00 2,400,000.00 45 13-059 Tay Bounchanh 1 4 150,000.00 600,000.00 46 13-015 Tay Bounchanh 1 4 150,000.00 600,000.00

Annex 2 63 IOL Code 47 13-025 48 13-026 49 13-017 50 13-052 51 13-006 52 13-016 53 13-009 54 13-019 55 13-033 56 13-039 57 13-012 58 13-010 59 13-036 60 13-027 61 13-051 62 13-001 63 13-018 64 13-032 65 13-005 Village Name of HH TREES Type Unit Cost Cost Tay Buapha 1 1 150,000.00 150,000.00 Tay Chanhchid 1 2 150,000.00 300,000.00 Tay Chanhsoa 1 7 150,000.00 1,050,000.00 Tay Chanhthala 1 13 Banana 20,000.00 260,000.00 Tay Deng 1 2 150,000.00 300,000.00 Tay Gnoudly 1 6 150,000.00 900,000.00 Tay Huan 1 1 150,000.00 150,000.00 Tay Huay 1 3 150,000.00 450,000.00 Tay Khamphanh 1 1 Yor 200,000.00 200,000.00 Tay Khoun 1 7 Bamboo/Mango 300,000.00 2,100,000.00 Tay Kongsi 1 2 Namnom 150,000.00 300,000.00 Tay Ladhsadi 1 2 150,000.00 300,000.00 Tay Lear 1 1 150,000.00 150,000.00 Tay Ly 1 3 150,000.00 450,000.00 Tay y 1 2 Coconut/Banana 320,000.00 640,000.00 Tay Piek 1 5 150,000.00 750,000.00 Tay Po 1 4 Banana/Mango 340,000.00 1,360,000.00 Tay Pod 1 3 Coconut 300,000.00 900,000.00 Tay Sathain 1 4 150,000.00 600,000.00 66 13-022 Sone 1 1 Cedar 200,000.00 200,000.00

64 Annex 2 IOL Code 67 13-011 68 13-029 69 13-031 70 13-008 71 13-023 72 13-053 73 13-057 74 13-021 75 13-045 76 13-050 77 13-035 Tay Village Name of HH TREES Type Unit Cost Cost Tay Thai 1 3 150,000.00 450,000.00 Tay Thai 1 4 Coconut/Mango 300,000.00 1,200,000.00 Tay Thai 1 3 150,000.00 450,000.00 Tay Thi 1 2 150,000.00 300,000.00 Tay Toa 1 3 Coconut 300,000.00 900,000.00 Tay Boun 1 150,000.00 150,000.00 Tay Boun 1 150,000.00 150,000.00 Tay Chek 2 150,000.00 300,000.00 Tay Poo 9 150,000.00 1,350,000.00 Tay Sanh 7 150,000.00 1,050,000.00 Tay Tieng 1 150,000.00 150,000.00 78 3-010 Thanaleng Bangaon 1 1 150,000.00 150,000.00 79 14-016 Nalong Khamhpheng 1 4 Coconut 300,000.00 1,200,000.00 80 8-002 Thapha Sombang 1 13 Mango 300,000.00 3,900,000.00 81 9-015 Thinthane Bounchamh 1 5 150,000.00 750,000.00 82 9-003 Thinthane Leokham 1 1 150,000.00 150,000.00 83 9-020 Thinthane Tasoundanone 1 1 Coconut 300,000.00 300,000.00 84 9-014 Thinthane Viengxay 1 4 Mango 300,000.00 1,200,000.00

Annex 2 65 b. COMMON PROPERTY IOL Code Village Name of HH TREES Type Unit Cost Cost 1 2-001 Dongphosy Cultural park (state land) 150 150,000.00 22,500,000.00 2 1018 ngheo ngheo village Land 7 150,000.00 1,050,000.00 4. COMPENSATION FOR BUSINESS DISRUPTION OF AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS IOL Code Village Name of HH Head HH Size Monthly Income from Business Daily Disturbance cost Assumption 1 11-008 Khouydeng Keum Sensouck 4 850,000 28,333.3 850,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 2 11-014 Khouydeng Thong Oudomsi 4 600,000 20,000.0 600,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 3 11-001 Khouydeng Somchan Thippaya 5 - - - 4 11-010 Khouydeng O onnaxay 9 1,350,000 45,000.0 1,350,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 5 11-028 Khouydeng Ladhtana 7 500,000 16,666.7 500,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 6 14-017 Nalong Sananh 5 12,000,000 400,000.0 12,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 7 1,009 ngheo Seng Phitsakounkanh 3 2,900,000 96,666.7 2,900,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 8 1,010 ngheo Phonesavanh 4 2,000,000 66,666.7 2,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 9 1,003 ngheo SisomePhone 4 900,000 30,000.0 900,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 10 10-005 Parkpeng Bee 7 3,500,000 116,666.7 3,500,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 11 10-001 Parkpeng Poommady 5 80,000 2,666.7 80,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 12 10-003 Parkpeng Khamphong 8 350,000 11,666.7 350,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 13 5-016 Pava Phetsoulichanh 5 500,000 16,666.7 500,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 14 5-015 Pava Lampon 5 2,000,000 66,666.7 2,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 15 5-004 Pava Vongphet 3 3,000,000 100,000.0 3,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 16 5-010 Pava Laviengkhon (Restaurant) 6 - - - assuming 30 days disturbance 17 5-008 Pava Pooliem 8 6,000,000 200,000.0 6,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 18 5-003 Pava Somsamai 7 750,000 25,000.0 750,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 19 5-019 Pava Kai Sipakanhlanga 3 4,500,000 150,000.0 4,500,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 20 5-017 Pava Khamsen 4 5,500,000 183,333.3 5,500,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 21 12-014 Neua Khamdy 4 2,000,000 66,666.7 2,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 22 12-004 Neua Kenchanh 5 500,000 16,666.7 500,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 23 12-010 Neua Soukanh 6 2,000,000 66,666.7 2,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance

66 Annex 2 IOL Code Village Name of HH Head HH Size Monthly Income from Business Daily Disturbance cost Assumption 24 12-005 Neua Thavone 3 1,200,000 40,000.0 1,200,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 25 12-023 Neua Inphenh 6 2,000,000 66,666.7 2,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 26 12-008 Neua Khampack 5 1,250,000 41,666.7 1,250,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 27 12-020 Neua Tanh 7 500,000 16,666.7 500,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 28 13-010 Tay Ladhsadi 5 3,000,000 100,000.0 3,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 29 13-035 Tay Tieng 6 500,000 16,666.7 500,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 30 13-004 Tay Sounlivone 3 3,000,000 100,000.0 3,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 31 13-003 Tay Pheng(Sinpheang) 4 10,000,000 333,333.3 10,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 32 13-025 Tay Buapha 3 800,000 26,666.7 800,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 33 6-002 Thadeua Kham 2 2,800,000 93,333.3 2,800,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 34 6-001 Thadeua Medam 5 5,000,000 166,666.7 5,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 35 6-004 Thadeua mephad (Vimala) 5 5,000,000 166,666.7 5,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 36 6-005 Thadeua Souni 6 2,500,000 83,333.3 2,500,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 37 3-003 Thanaleng Mock 5 4,000,000 133,333.3 4,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 38 3-004 Thanaleng Sidtiphong 3 900,000 30,000.0 900,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 39 3-010 Thanaleng Bangaon 1 2,800,000 93,333.3 2,800,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 40 3-009 Thanaleng Tuy 4 4,500,000 150,000.0 4,500,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 41 3-001 Thanaleng Khammay 4 8,000,000 266,666.7 8,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 42 3-005 Thanaleng Southep 5 10,000,000 333,333.3 10,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 43 3-007 Thanaleng Chanhpheng 7 2,000,000 66,666.7 2,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 44 3-006 Thanaleng Pheng 5 500,000 16,666.7 500,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 45 8-003 Thapha Berm 6 2,000,000 66,666.7 2,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 46 8-004 Thapha Khamphone 4 300,000 10,000.0 300,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 47 8-014 Thapha Somphone 5 3,000,000 100,000.0 3,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 48 8-015 Thapha Pomady 5 1,000,000 33,333.3 1,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 49 8-013 Thapha Keovanhnapom 6 4,500,000 150,000.0 4,500,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 50 8-001 Thapha Samnaun 9 1,400,000 46,666.7 1,400,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 51 8-008 Thapha Tha 8 600,000 20,000.0 600,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 52 8-002 Thapha Sombang 13 2,000,000 66,666.7 2,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance

Annex 2 67 IOL Code Village Name of HH Head HH Size Monthly Income from Business Daily Disturbance cost Assumption 53 8-016 Thapha Bountom 5 10,000,000 333,333.3 10,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 54 8-006 Thapha Ngoud 6 150,000 5,000.0 150,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 55 8-009 Thapha Moopoun 6 600,000 20,000.0 600,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 56 9-020 Thinthane Tasoundanone 4 2,700,000 90,000.0 2,700,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 57 9-007 Thinthane Vathsana 6 3,500,000 116,666.7 3,500,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 58 9-004 Thinthane Bay 4 450,000 15,000.0 450,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 59 9-001 Thinthane Aar 4 500,000 16,666.7 500,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 60 9-019 Thinthane Veng 7 1,000,000 33,333.3 1,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 61 9-008 Thinthane Amin 9 400,000 13,333.3 400,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 62 9-002 Thinthane Sumnain 6 1,500,000 50,000.0 1,500,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 63 9-017 Thinthane Song 5 500,000 16,666.7 500,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 64 7-003 Thintom Teo sangbausy 6 3,000,000 100,000.0 3,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 65 7-002 Thintom Khampauen 6 2,000,000 66,666.7 2,000,000.00 assuming 30 days disturbance 5. ASSISTANCE TO VULNERABLE AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS IOL Code Village Name of HH Head HH Size Tennant Elderly HH Fem HH Head HH Below Poverty Line: < $1.25 1 2-005 Dongphosy Soudphaphone 3 1 1,440,000.00 2 2-007 Dongphosy Manivanh Thammavong 5 1 2,400,000.00 1 11-012 Khouydeng Somephone 5 1 2,400,000.00 2 11-004 Khouydeng Buosyliphanh 5 1 1 1 2,400,000.00 3 11-008 Khouydeng Keum Sensouck 4 1 1,920,000.00 4 11-024 Khouydeng Laung 5 1 1 2,400,000.00 5 11-003 Khouydeng Khamhphanh 2 1 1 960,000.00 6 11-020 Khouydeng Phan 2 1 1 960,000.00 7 11-032 Khouydeng Seng 5 1 2,400,000.00 8 11-018 Khouydeng Cheay 3 1 1,440,000.00 9 11-028 Khouydeng Ladhtana 7 1 3,360,000.00 Cost

68 Annex 2 IOL Code Village Name of HH Head HH Size Tennant Elderly HH Fem HH Head HH Below Poverty Line: < $1.25 1 14-016 Nalong Khamhpheng 9 1 4,320,000.00 2 14-007 Nalong Amphone 7 1 3,360,000.00 1 1,001 ngheo Vanh Phala 5 1 2,400,000.00 2 1,002 ngheo Theo Vongduangchanh 5 1 1 2,400,000.00 3 1,003 ngheo SisomePhone 4 1 1,920,000.00 4 1,005 ngheo Sounanh Phala 2 1 960,000.00 Haem Phommachan (land owner in 5 1,020 ngheo Vte) 5 1 2,400,000.00 Koulab (location of land owner 1 6 1,021 ngheo unknown) 5 1 2,400,000.00 Suphab (location of land owner 7 1,025 ngheo unknown) 5 1 1 2,400,000.00 8 1,016 ngheo Tame (land owner in Vte) 5 1 2,400,000.00 9 1,022 ngheo Lee (land owner in Vte) 5 1 2,400,000.00 name (location of land owner 10 1,017 ngheo unknown) 5 1 2,400,000.00 11 1,019 ngheo uxai (land owner in Vte) 5 1 2,400,000.00 12 1,004 ngheo Phet (location of land owner unknown) 5 1 2,400,000.00 13 1,027 ngheo Sengphet (land owner in Vte) 5 1 2,400,000.00 1 10-008 Parkpeng Udoon 6 1 2,880,000.00 2 10-003 Parkpeng Khamphong 8 1 3,840,000.00 3 10-006 Parkpeng Soomkied 5 1 2,400,000.00 4 10-005 Parkpeng Bee 7 1 3,360,000.00 5 10-002 Parkpeng Hip 4 1 1,920,000.00 1 5-010 Pava Laviengkhon (Restaurant) 6 1 1 2,880,000.00 2 5-002 Pava Koun 2 1 1 960,000.00 3 5-020 Pava Vinavon SOMSALOA 5 1 2,400,000.00 4 5-011 Pava Bounleard Pativong 3 1 1,440,000.00 5 5-007 Pava Shamli 6 1 1 2,880,000.00 6 5-006 Pava Vidavone 5 1 2,400,000.00 7 5-003 Pava Somsamai 7 1 3,360,000.00 Cost

Annex 2 69 IOL Code Village Name of HH Head HH Size Tennant Elderly HH Fem HH Head HH Below Poverty Line: < $1.25 8 5-018 Pava Ampaivanh 5 1 2,400,000.00 9 5-008 Pava Pooliem 8 1 3,840,000.00 10 5-016 Pava Phetsoulichanh 5 1 2,400,000.00 11 5-017 Pava Khamsen 4 1 1 1,920,000.00 12 5-019 Pava Kai Sipakanhlanga 3 1 1 1,440,000.00 13 5-004 Pava Vongphet 3 1 1,440,000.00 1 12-001 Neua Vhand 4 1 1,920,000.00 2 12-017 Neua KongKham 3 1 1 1,440,000.00 3 12-018 Neua Leng 4 1 1,920,000.00 4 12-009 Neua Gnuad 3 1 1 1,440,000.00 5 12-025 Neua Thongla 5 1 1 2,400,000.00 6 12-011 Neua Champa 5 1 2,400,000.00 7 12-004 Neua Kenchanh 5 1 2,400,000.00 8 12-020 Neua Tanh 7 1 3,360,000.00 9 12-015 Neua Lead 4 1 1,920,000.00 10 12-005 Neua Thavone 3 1 1,440,000.00 11 12-019 Neua In 5 1 1 2,400,000.00 1 13-026 Tay Chanhchid 4 1 1 1,920,000.00 2 13-018 Tay Po 7 1 1 3,360,000.00 3 13-034 Tay Veuan 7 1 3,360,000.00 4 13-063 Tay Bonh 6 1 2,880,000.00 Cost

70 Annex 2 IOL Code 5 13-061 6 13-049 7 13-027 8 13-012 9 13-020 10 13-038 11 13-013 12 13-046 13 13-047 14 13-008 15 13-053 16 13-045 17 13-050 18 13-056 Village Name of HH Head HH Size Tennant Elderly HH Fem HH Head HH Below Poverty Line: < $1.25 Tay Souphap 8 1 1 3,840,000.00 Tay Poud 7 1 3,360,000.00 Tay Ly 5 1 1 2,400,000.00 Tay Kongsi 7 1 3,360,000.00 Tay Banh 6 1 2,880,000.00 Tay Chanh 7 1 3,360,000.00 Tay Pheng 1 1 1 480,000.00 Tay Bounsy 10 1 4,800,000.00 Tay Bounfoun 5 1 2,400,000.00 Tay Thi 5 1 2,400,000.00 Tay Boun 6 1 2,880,000.00 Tay Poo 7 1 3,360,000.00 Tay Sanh 6 1 2,880,000.00 Tay Aoun 4 1 1,920,000.00 1 6-005 Thadeua Souni 6 1 2,880,000.00 2 6-003 Thadeua Saman Mahachan 2 1 960,000.00 3 6-006 Thadeua Soupi 12 1 5,760,000.00 4 6-001 Thadeua Medam 5 1 1 2,400,000.00 5 6-004 Thadeua mephad (Vimala) 5 1 1 2,400,000.00 6 6-002 Thadeua Kham 2 1 960,000.00 1 4-007 Thamuang Chanhthaly 5 1 2,400,000.00 2 4-006 Thamuang Duan 5 1 2,400,000.00 Cost

Annex 2 71 IOL Code Village Name of HH Head HH Size Tennant Elderly HH Fem HH Head HH Below Poverty Line: < $1.25 1 3-002 Thanaleng Ladtanaphone 5 1 2,400,000.00 2 3-007 Thanaleng Chanhpheng 7 1 3,360,000.00 3 3-003 Thanaleng Mock 5 1 2,400,000.00 4 3-006 Thanaleng Pheng 5 1 2,400,000.00 5 3-010 Thanaleng Bangaon 1 480,000.00 1 8-008 Thapha Tha 8 1 1 3,840,000.00 2 8-006 Thapha Ngoud 6 1 1 2,880,000.00 3 8-009 Thapha Moopoun 6 1 2,880,000.00 4 8-002 Thapha Sombang 13 1 2,880,000.00 5 8-005 Thapha Souphab 5 1 1 6,240,000.00 6 8-016 Thapha Bountom 5 1 2,400,000.00 1 9-002 Thinthane Sumnain 6 1 2,880,000.00 2 9-004 Thinthane Bay 4 1 1,920,000.00 3 9-017 Thinthane Song 5 1 2,400,000.00 Cost

72 Annex 3 Annex 3: Minutes of Public Consultations Food and Drought Risk Mitigation and Management Project MINUTES OF THE CONSULTATION MEETING Hadxayfong District, 1 October 2010 1. The objectives of the meeting were to inform the public that one of the six subprojects of Flood and Drought Risk Management and Mitigation Project (FDRMMP) shall be implemented in their area for the reparation and strengthening of canal embankments and to get the opinions of the participants that shall be considered in the subproject design. 2. The Public Consultation Meeting was held at Thanaleng Temple in Hadxayfong District which started at 8:25 a.m. It was chaired by Mr. Khanthaly, Deputy to District Leader. A total of 35 participants from 36 villages have attended the meeting and were given 90 copies of the Project Information Booklet written in Lao language. 3. After the brief opening remarks of Mr. Khantaly, Mr. Somsanith, Irrigation Section staff of PAFO in Vientiane Capital, presented the technique and design of the Subproject. He was followed by Mr. Nilinda, National Environment Specialist, of the survey regarding the environmental impacts of activities during the construction of the subproject, such as on air, water, noise, soil, plants and etc.. Ms. Duangchith Viravongsa, National Social Safeguards Specialist, talked about the definition of development. Development means to improve the old thing or bad thing to be better and it has positive and negative affects. These can be determined through the survey in the subproject areas by conducting SPA interview and IOL and SES. 4. The meeting was opened for open forum following the presentations. The issues raised by participants covered both the issues on irrigation system repair and maintenance, and that of resettlement. Listed below are the issues from the participants and the responses by the Chairman. Issues / Comments from the Participants: (a) Mr. Leuan, Elder Ban ThaMuang: What is the size of the canal embankments? Answer: Base: Wide 16 m Top: wide 12 m High 1,00-1,50 m and length is about 70 km (PIS answered) (b) Mr. Khamphanh, Sithan Tay Village Leader: There are few APs in their village, no agriculture land affected, but only one extended structure would be affected. However, the APs are aware and ready to move out from the extension. Mr. Kham disclosed that there was a Chinese company that conducted the survey on the road and the village last year. (c) Mr. Sisouphanh, Deputy to Hadkhansa Village Leader: He proposed that the subproject should also cover their village because of the yearly occurrence of floods. (d) Ms. Amphone, Hadxayfong Neua Village: There is electricity pillar along 28 km of the road. What the project should do on this structure? Project design will look at minimize affect (NESS answered)

Annex 3 73 (e) Ms. Somchanh, Simmano Village Deputy Leader: He proposed that the project in their area be constructed along the river in order to reduce numbers of APs along the river side (f) Mr. Thavone, Deputy Thapha Village Leader: If the existing embankment is rehabilitated, it shall affect 200 HHs that could be relocated. He proposed that the embankment be constructed along the river wherein only 10 HHs would be affected. (g) Mr. Somsack, Deputy to Thintom Village leader: What about land acquisition? Answer: a. The Social Safeguards Specialist will conduct IOL soon, every AP have right to receive compensation who will be included in the IOL that will be conducted few days after this meeting (NSSS answered) b. The Project will assign committee for land compensation which is composed of village representative. The compensation shall be based on current market price. The price shall be agreed between the District Land Administration authority and the APs (NESS answered) 5. The Consultation Chairman reminded to the participants the floods in this area, specifically in year 2008, when 3,500 ha of paddy rice were damaged. From this event, the Government of Laos has been seeking money for the improvement of the embankment. Whatever, the subproject should be designed in a way that will minimize the APs and consider two options: (i) conduct of survey along track road; and (ii) the survey of new track along the river. Mr. Khantaly explained the four types type of lands to be compensated: Land developed with title Land developed with no title Land with title no develop and Land with no title no develop 6. The Consultation Chairman has proposed to the ADB Consultants to include the Hadkhansa and Done villages under the subproject. He advised the ADB Consultants for constant consultations with the village people in order to reduce the negative impacts during subproject construction. 7. The public consultation and meeting was adjourned at 11:15 a.m. Sample Photo during Public Consultation The participants in Hadxayfong District who attended the public consultations on 1 October 2010 while reading the contents of the Lao version of the PIB.

74 Annex 3 MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION, VIENTIANE CAPITAL I. On Morning Friday, 11 May 2012 at DAFO, Hadsayfong District PEOPLES PRESENT DURING CONSULTATION: From the Implementing Agencies: 1. Mr. Pkammai Vongstiane-DOI-MAF 2. Mr. Soukhaserm DoW, Ministry of Public work and Transport 3. Mr. Somphath Irrigation Technique, Department of Agriculture and Forestry Office, Vientiane Capital 4. Mr.Phimmasone STTC, Vientiane Capital 5. Mr. Phouvanh - Irrigation Technique- District Director of DAFO, Hadsayfong District 6. Mr. Tavanh- DAFO staff, Hadsayfong From Consultants: Maan/Duangchith and 6 enumerators (attendance sheet 1) : Issues Discussed by the Participants: The consultation meeting at Hadsayfong no Participation of APs or Local Authorities representative, consequence, the meeting discussion mainly related to the survey instrument, and implementation arrangement, the table bellow is noted from meeting discussion: 1 Issue Raised Responses from the meeting By Issue By Response Mr. Soukaseum suggests Ms Thasany, as IA that Conducting the Senior IOL survey should be used Survey GPS for the survey. In Team order to minor the gap that will be occurred during project implementation Mr. Soukaseum Khammai Maan It is Good, if project could provide the GPS to the survey team, for the last survey we used only meter. We have been used the GPS for civil work for previous project, it will be better if we use GPS for the survey Explained the purpose of this survey that, this time we will fill up the data and information as missing from the last survey in order to complete the preparation of RP. Based on the process, after project as well as PR were proved by the relevant LAs, then detail project will be designed, that time resettlement activities will adjustment or finalization of RP and other documents following detailed design with specific

Annex 3 75 project boundaries, if necessary. 2 Mr. Soukaseum This the past he did not involve to project engineer consultant regard to project design as well as embankment design, so he want to share information on project design specifically embankment design. Dungchith In 2010, WREA is EA for this project, I sent every thing direct to them, whatever, I have been CC of the RCS report to Khammai. By the way, we understand that now DOI become EA, every thing should through Mr. Khmmai as National Project Coordinator. 3 Khammai Mr. Soukaseum Mr. Soukaseum This the past he did not receive report on data and information on APs, He want to share of such data Moreover, we need to improve Mechanism for implementation of project such as Improve cooperation, coordination among EA-IAs and consultants as well. NPCO at DOI is very important role. I will blame Mr. Khammai if he do not share information or data- Soukaseum said How the arrangement for this survey Khammai Phouvanh OK In Hadsayfong District, He was nominated as District coordinator for this project. And for this survey he was assigned from DAFO head to responsible for the survey same as last survey. In the past he regular report to DAFO head and District Governor on the task assigned There having no other matters to be discussed, the meeting was adjourned at 12:30 and survey team started to work in afternoon of the day Prepared by: Duangchith

76 Annex 3 MINUTES OF THE LAST CONSULTATION, VIENTIANE CAPITAL II. On Morning Friday, 25 May 2012 at DAFO, Hadsayfong District PEOPLES PRESENT DURING CONSULTATION: From the Implementing Agencies: 1. Mr. Khanthly Phanivong, Vice District Governor, Hadsayfong. 2. Mr. Pkammai Vongstiane-DOI-MAF 3. Mr. Soukhaserm DoW, Ministry of Public work and Transport 4. Mr. Chanthsnom Irrigation Technique, Department of Agriculture and Forestry, Vientiane Capital 5. Mr.Phimmasone STTC, Vientiane Capital 6. Mr. Saveuy, Deputy to GD of DAFO Hadsayfong 7. Mr. Phouvanh - Irrigation Technique- District Director of DAFO, Hadsayfong District 8. Mr. Tavanh- DAFO staff, Hadsayfong From Consultants: Maan/Duangchith andthasany Villagers from Hadxayfong District: 16 people: (attendance sheet 1) Issues Discussed by the Participants: Issue Raised Responses from the meeting By Issue By Response 1 2 3 Khammai Ms. Maan Mr. Chanthason Meunsophafrom Pava village (House affected) consultation of your opinion on the cut-off-date for APs In Pava village, why there are some households did not sign the interview form? How we can do next? I asked Team survey when the project will be started, but no body answer? Mr. Chanthalith Village Head of Ban Thamoung Ms. Boulom Phommaly, Deputy Village Head, Pava village Khammai Mr. Soukaseum We accept the cut-off-date, but APs should be informed 2-3 months before the commencement of the construction - Accept the cut-off-date. but APs should be informed 2-3 months before the commencement of the construction - Some APs did not stay at home during the survey. - I will be in charge for inform them. - Regarding the impact of the project, the fence of my property near by the embankment was also affected and I worry on this matter. Whatever, I fell good after reading PIB that Persons whose houses, structures and/or crops and even communal properties that will be affected will be properly compensated in cash or in kind I expected the project will be started to implement by the end of 2012 w the project is on going to finalize the feasibility study, RP and other documents, and then the project approval, will be designed in detail technically, the final RP and other documents will be develop according to the detailed design

Annex 3 77 4 5 Mr. Chanthason Meunsopha Maan My house was affected and will be resettled, I have no money and no land, can the project provide the assistance? Last survey APs in ban Nalong is 27 HH, for this survey is only 3 HHs we like to consultation of your opinion on this matter, and last survey found the fence of the temple is affected, and Khmmai suggested the alignment should be designed to avoid of such affected Khammai Mr. Khanthaly, Vice District Governor Mr. Ken Thongphachanh, Village Head of Ban Thintane The affected house and others structures shall be compensated at replacement cost without deduction for depreciation or salvageable materials, plus provision of labor cost for dismantling and reconstruction. By this, the APs will be able to build a replacement house or structure District did not receive report of the last survey regarding to number of APs and the cost of resettlement. Whatever, we accept the alignment of the embankment as the team have been surveyed and we all understand that the Government will responsible for resettlement cost - In Thinthane there are in total 23 APs including temple fence and school; the numbers of APs of this survey is still the same number of the survey in 2010, because we did not allow people build any structure in the project boundary. - Regarding to the temple fence, there is no valuable thing inside the fence and we have no objection to remove it, 6 7 8 9 Mr. Khanthaly, Vice District Governor Ms. Boulom. Mr. Chanthason Meunsopha Mr. Sommaly, Ban Parkpeng Mr. Chanthason Meunsopha Along Nalong road, there is other team survey for the road construction, and the survey boundary is different from this project boundary, this will makes people confuse Right now we want to know the exact project boundary If 2/3 of the house was affected, how does project do regarding to compensation? If project boundary indicated 8 m left and 8 m right from centre line, can we construct permanent building outside project boundary? Need official letter from related Authority on project information and need regular Phouvanh, DAFO Mr. Khanthaly, Vice District Governor Khammai Mr. Saveuy, Deputy to GD of DAFO Hadsayfong Mr. Khanthaly, Vice District Governor Mr. Khanthaly, Vice District Governor The project boundary is 16 meters, 8 m left and 8 m left from centre line of embankment, in case of the embankment next to the Mekong bank, it will be 16 meters left from centre If 2/3 of your house was affected and you can not stay any more, then you should remove. This case you will receive full cost of rebuild of your house, As we know, project will do final design based on your opinions on how the impacts of the subprojects shall be minimized, consequence the alignment maybe change, if necessary Suggest people who want to build permanent structure, should meet and consult with Public work office, they may know and consider where will be allowed or will not be allowed to build the structure Based on experience from MoNRE project, 25 maters left and right from centre line, they do not allow any structure, and who wish to build any structure should request to public work office for consideration and approval - This is formal consensus of the meeting: 16 meters along the road

78 Annex 3 10 11 Mr. Ken Thongphchnh, Village Head of Ban Thintane Mr. Chanthason Meunsopha Maan information sharing Support Chanthason suggestion, village need official letter on project boundary and others information What is the Principle and Process to implement the compensation and resettlement of APs? Chines conducted the survey for road construction during Ban Simmano-Neu to Simmano-Tay road? Mr. Khanthaly, Vice District Governor Khammai Mr. Soukaseum Mr. Khanthaly, Vice District Governor are prohibited to build any structure - Regard to RCS, Land Administration Authority has adjusted the price of the land, have to find in Degree. 352 Project IAs will responsible for implement the compensation and resettlement activities - Project established NPCO at DOI, - IA office at subproject official s level, and Grievance Redress Committee. - Project will ensure that any movement of houses will be assisted. Shops or stalls will be within only a short distance of the existing structures. Shops and stalls will be relocated in consultation with the owners and with community representatives - The procedures of filing a grievance is provided in PIB, t only this road has been surveyed, every road has been surveyed either for public investment master plan and/or for project proposal preparation. Whatever, it never overlapping among public investment in the same area There is so many companies conducted the survey for road construction in this area, for instant Fuchiane company, Siafong company (Chines company), and for last time is Chitjaleunphone company. People here are very bored to response the interview to the survey team. Additionally, some case, villagers have been removed their structure already, but the company did not do any thing after that There having no other matters to be discussed, the meeting was adjourned at 12:30 Prepared by:duangchith

Annex 4 79 Annex 4: Project Information Booklet Presented During 2012 Consultations 1. QUESTION: What are the objectives of this public consultation? ANSWER: The main objective of this consultation is to inform public that the national government of Lao PDR shall implement the Flood and Drought Risk Management and Mitigation Project (FDRMMP) and that Project management desires to seek your opinion on the Project for further consideration in the final design of the Sub-Projects. 2. QUESTION: What is FDRMMP? ANSWER: The Flood and Drought Risk Management and Mitigation Project or FDRMMP is a regional project within the Mekong Sub-region as assisted by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) covering Laos, Cambodia and Viet Nam where each country has identified priority local areas for subproject implementation. Specific to Lao PDR, the project will support: (i) Enhanced Regional Data, Information, and Knowledge Base for the Management of Flood and Droughts; (ii) Upgrade Water Management Infrastructure; (iii) Enhanced Capacity of Community Based Disaster Risk Management; and (iv) Effective Project Implementation. The subprojects are the Vientiane Flood Protection Embankment and the Irrigation Development Subproject in Vientiane Capital. 3. QUESTION: What are the affected areas? ANSWER: Project-affected districts in Vientiane are (i) Hadxayfong, (ii) Xaythany, and (iii) Paknguem. Subproject District Commune Village I. Vientiane A. Hadxayfong 1. Salakham i. ngheo Flood Protection Embankment 2. Thadeua ii. Dongphosy iii. Thamuang iv. Pava v. Thadeua vi. Thintom 3. Thapha vii. Thanaleng viii. Thapha ix. Thinthane x. Parkpeng 4. xi. Khouaydeng xii. Simmano Neua xiii. Simmano Tay II. Irrigation Development Subproject in Vientiane Capital xiv. Nalong B. Xaythany 5. Huahxieng xv. Xanghuabo xvi. Dongkhuauy C. Pakngum 6. Dongkaluem xvii. Makhio 3 districts 6 communes 17 villages 4. QUESTION: Who is responsible for the Project? ANSWER: The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) is the executing agency for the Project. MAF will delegate the responsibility for overall project coordination and management to the Department of Irrigation (DOI). In turn, DOI will establish a National Project Coordination Office (NPCO) responsible for project coordination and management. The Implementing Agencies (IAs) will be the Provincial Agricultural and Forestry Office (PAFO) of Vientiane Capital with supervision from DOI; Department of Waterways (DOW) of the Ministry of Public Works; and Department of Meteorology and Hydrology (DMH) through the National Early Warning Center (NEWC) in Headquarters. NPCO will be responsible for

80 Annex 4 coordinating and overseeing the implementation of resettlement activities in partnership with local government units. 5. QUESTION: Is the improvement of the embankment and irrigation canal intended to benefit us? ANSWER: Yes. There are many benefits that you should expect from the improved embankment and irrigation canals, such as the following: (i) reduced floods; (ii) minimized losses of crops; (iii) availability of water for farms; (iv) prevent loss of lives during rainy season; and (v) prevention of water-borne diseases. The Project will indirectly help the people in reducing poverty from these anticipated benefits. 6. QUESTION: How will this Project affect us? ANSWER: The flood and drought risk management and mitigation improvement will involve the repair and strengthening of embankments and irrigation canals. Houses and structures along these areas need to be relocated, permanently or temporarily. Vegetables planted on embankments or canals need to be cleared to facilitate the movement of workers during repair or construction. An updated survey will be conducted of all affected persons and the people in your communities will be consulted to solicit their opinions on how the impacts of the subprojects shall be minimized. Persons whose houses, structures and/or crops and even communal properties that will be affected will be properly compensated in cash or in kind. Project Management will ensure that affected households will be to restore lost assets, resources or incomes. Rehabilitation assistance will also be provided to affected persons (APs) who will be required to relocate in another location. 7. QUESTION: What if my land nearest the embankment or irrigation canal will be affected? ANSWER: In case of land nearest the embankment or irrigation canal is affected, compensation can be in the form of replacement land or cash at current market value. If land has been the agreed form of compensation between APs and the Project, the replacement land should be of equal or better productive capacity of the lost land acceptable to the APs. 8. QUESTION: Do we need to have a land title in order to be compensated? ANSWER:. The lack of formal legal rights to the land does not prevent any AP from receiving compensation and rehabilitation assistance. However, in order to become eligible to receive compensation and rehabilitation assistance, they should have been included in the census and in the conduct of inventory of losses (IOL) as limited by the cut-off date that will be determined by the IA. The APs will be validated during the updated resettlement plan (RP) when the FDRMMP has been approved by ADB for implementation. 9. QUESTION: Does compensation apply to my affected houses or structures? ANSWER: Yes. The affected houses and structures shall be compensated at replacement cost without deduction for depreciation or salvageable materials, plus provision of labor cost for dismantling and reconstruction. By this, the APs will be able to build a replacement house or structure. 10. QUESTION: What about my crops and trees? ANSWER: For annual crops, APs will be given 2 months notice that the land on which their crops are planted will be used by the Project and that they must harvest their crops in time. If standing crops are ripening and cannot be harvested, eligible APs shall be compensated for the loss of un-harvested crops at their current market values. For perennial crops, APs will be compensated for the loss of fruit and timber trees planted on the embankments/irrigation canal. The value will be calculated as the annual produce value multiplied by a five-year factor. This will compensate for lost income until the newly planted seedlings bear fruit.

Annex 4 81 11. QUESTION: In case there will be relocation of houses or small businesses, how can the Project help in rebuilding my house during relocation? ANSWER: Houses or other property, which have to be relocated or demolished, will be paid for at the cost of rebuilding with new materials. Apart from the compensation for loss of land and other assets at replacement costs, the Project will ensure that the standard of living of APs are maintained or better improved after the Project. Therefore, the Project will provide mitigation and subsistence allowance to relocating APs and will ensure that any movement of houses will be assisted. Shops or stalls will be within only a short distance of the existing structures. Shops and stalls will be relocated in consultation with the owners and with community representatives. 12. QUESTION: When is the cut-off date for affected households? ANSWER: The project shall maintain the original cut-off dates taken from the last day the original survey was conducted in 2010 as follows: Village Cut-Off Date Thanaleng and Parkpeng 16 October 2010 Thamuang 17 October 2010 Pava and Thinthane 18 October 2010 Khouaydeng 19 October 2010 Thadeua, Thapha and Thintom 20 October 2010 ngheo 22 October 2010 Dongkhuauy 24 October 2010 Dongphosy 28 October 2010 Simmano Neua and Xanghuabo 29 October 2010 Simmano Tay and Nalong 02 vember 2010 Makhio 03 vember 2010 13. QUESTION: When will the updated surveys be conducted? ANSWER: The updated surveys will be carried out soon after this consultation. The activities will be carried out in the presence of APs, local authorities and representatives of the IA. 14. QUESTION: If there will be disagreements or problems that arise during project implementation such as compensation, technical and general project-related disputes, do I have the right to voice out my complaint? ANSWER: Yes. The procedures of filing a grievance is provided: Stage 1 - Filing of complaints at subproject official s level 2 - Filing of complaints at GRC level 3 - Stage 3: Filing of complaints at IA Head Office IA and NPCO level Activities / Procedures All complaints and grievances must be properly documented by subproject officials. Complaints will be investigated through consultations aimed at resolving matters at the sub-project level. The objective is to resolve disagreements through consensus wherever possible without being referred to the district-level GRC. All meetings between the IA and complainants will be held in public place with participation by representatives of the AHs, local nonbenefit organizations, mass organizations and village head to ensure transparency. The subproject IA must propose a resolution within 15 days from the filing of the complaint. If a resolution proposed by IA is not reached to the satisfaction of the community or AH, the complaints will be forwarded to GRC. If the AH does not receive a satisfactory response from GRC within 20 days of filing the complaint, or if the matter is not resolved to the satisfaction of the AH, the representative of AHs, local non-benefit organization or mass organization will, on behalf of the AH, submit the complaint to the head office of the IA and the NPCO.

82 Annex 4 4. Stage 4. If the complaint or grievance is still unresolved within 20 days of receipt by the Elevating IA and NPCO, the representatives of the local non-benefit organization and complaints to mass organization will, upon request of the AH, forward the complaint to the Court of law Court of Law and follow-up with relevant authorities. Filing of complaints with the Court of Law may be done separately and independent of the project organized grievance resolution process at any stage of the process. The decision of the Court of Law is final. AH = affected household, GRC = Grievance Redress Committee, IA = Implementing Agency, MAF = Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, NPCO = National Project Coordinating Office APs will be exempted from all taxes, administrative and legal fees. 15. QUESTION: When will the Project be implemented? ANSWER: FDRMMP shall be implemented in 2012/3. If you have further queries and suggestions, please contact us at: National Project Coordinator National Project Coordinating Office Dept. Of Irrigation, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR

Annex 5 83 A. INTRODUCTION Annex 5: Replacement Cost Survey Report (2010) 1. The Ministry Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) of the Government of Lao PDR will invest on the structural and the non-structural components for the proposed Flood and Drought Risk and Mitigation and Management Project under the Great Mekong Sub-region (GMS). Preparation of the Project was undertaken through RETA. 6456 from Asian Development Bank (ADB). The MAF has three (3) structural subprojects being proposed in the south of Vientiane Capital and Saravanh provinces such as follows (i) Flood Protection and Drought Mitigation Project, Vientiane (ii) Irrigation Development Project, Na Lek-Taopoun, Saravane (iii) Water Control Gates Project, Sedone River, Khongsedone, Saravane 2. The above subprojects will require land acquisition or land recovery during implementation and shall displace people and their properties. As a commitment to Asian Development Bank (ADB), MAF will prepare a Resettlement Plan (RP) for any subproject that would displace people. The RP shall be prepared based on the relevant legislation in Laos and the policy requirements of ADB on involuntary resettlement. A section on the RP document will discuss on the budget for compensation to affected properties and other assets of affected persons (APs). The amount of compensation and relocation of APs should be ideal so that MAF could provide an adequate financial support during the implementation of the RP. As such, MAF has commissioned a replacement cost survey (RCS) in order to determine the budget for compensation of the APs. B. OBJECTIVE 3. The objective of RCS is to determine the replacement cost rates that will be applied in calculating the compensation for APs as required in the preparation of sample RP. The conduct of the RCS covered the areas where the Proposed of flood protection in Hadxayfong District and irrigation in Xaythany and Park Ngum District of Vientiane Capital will be undertaken. C. APPROACHES 1. Team Composition: The RCS team is composes of RCS consultant, Village Representative and accompanies of DAFO-PAFO staffs sometime and with supervise of NSSS. Team Leader: Mr. Kheopouthone, RCS consultant; Lao Development Network Consulting Co Ltd., Conduct survey Mr. Sompath, Irrigation Technical, PAFO, Irrigation Division Vientiane Capital, Coorperate with Village Authority Representative of respective Village, facilitate of the survey Duangchith National Social Safeguard Specialist, give supervise 2. Sources of Information Secondary data: from documents on property declarations at the district government s office and on local publications that advertised the auction on foreclosed properties, DAFO, and District Land Management Authority Office

84 Annex 5 Primary data: The interviews were conducted by using a pre-developed survey tool. Sample size of respondents was 32 determined by the interviewer: 1) Seventeen (17) AP s in 17 villages of three District: Hadxayfong, Xaythani, and Park Ngum 2) Four (4) n-ap s in Four (4) villages of District: Hadxayfong, Xaythani, and Park Ngum 3) Two (2) traders in 2 villages of District: Hadxayfong, 4) Four (4) Village Chiefs in three District: Hadxayfong, Xaythani, and Park Ngum 5) Five (5) staffs of Vientiane Capital PAFO, Hadxayfong, Saythany and Park Ngum DAFO and Land Management Authority of Hadxayfong On the current value of land, the information was obtained from various source totally 9 people were interviewed 1) PAs in Ban Pava, and Thintane, of Hadxayfong District, Ban Xanghouabor in Xaythany District, Ban Markhio of Park Ngum District 2) n APs, Ban Simmano and Nalong of District Hadxayfong 3) Village Chief Ban Thintane and Pava of Hadxayfong Distric 4) Head of Land Taxation Unit, Hadxayfong District Land Management Authority Office Regarding to price gathered from different source has ready different cost such as Government cost is lowest, current market and offered price respectively On prices of construction materials, 3 suppliers and four Direct APs were interviewed 1) One construction materials supplier in Hatsayfong District 2) Two construction materials suppliers in Sysatanak district 3) Two Direct APs on effected house 4) Two Direct APs on Fence On Electricity Base price: only single source of electricity base price was obtained: Electricity Hadxayfong Office On irrigation price: Irrigation Section PAFO, Ban Nalong villagers and Village leader. Unfortunately, no information regarding the price of canal from villagers and leader due to lack of recording system in the village On prices of trees: Hadsayfong DAFO, 3 Direct APs in Hadxayfong District were obtained On prices of crops: 1) 3 Direct APs and 1 n-aps in Hadxayfong, Park Ngum and Saythany District were obtained 2) 1 DAFO in Hadxayfong 3) Fruit middlemen (Hounday) on road in Kouydeng of Hadxayfong District, 3. Coverage of the Survey The survey was conducted in between 25 October- 7 vember 2010 covered of 3 districts in Vientiane Capital which total 32 samples were interviewed

Annex 5 85 RESULTS OF THE RCS The existing dyke for Mekong river flooded protection is affected starting from Ban.ngheo- Ban.maknao with length of 25 km, the width of the dyke 7 m has been using as the road surface, each walking path is 1 m, the total length is 9.00 m. The high of the dyke is 1 m above the flooding level in 2008. Irrigation construction to take the water from Makhoui stream into the 300 Ha, the canal include the main and the secondary canal with the length of 5.200 Km and the installation of the water pump at Makhoui to drain out the water that cover two villages, Ban Xanghoubor and Ban DongKouy, Xaythany District. The project covers 17 villages in Hadxayfong; 2 villages of Xaythani and one village in Par Ngum District. There is totally 353 households are affected which is 11, 95.46 ha of land; 262 effected village and public s structure; 52 effected business and 11 houses are displacement. a) Land Types of Affected Land Distance from the embankment or road Unit Prices per Sq. Meter (Kip) Sold in 2007 Sold in 2008 Sold in 2009 Agricultural Land Rice land + Rice Land 5 m from the road 180.000 200.000 225.000 + Rice Land: 5 m from the road 175.000 210.000 235.000 Garden + Fruit tree garden Land 5 m from the road 180.000 200.000 230.000 + Crop garden land 5 m from the road 190.000 220.000 250.000 Residence Land + Housing land: 5 m asphalt road 900.000 1.300.000 1.800.000 + Housing land: 5 m earth road 600.000 1.000.000 1.600.000 Commercial Land + Within the Town 5 m asphalt road 1.500.000 3.000.000 6.000.000 + Out site the Town 5 m earth road 1.000.000 1.700.000 2.500.000 Public Land 5 m from the canal 35.000 40.000 50.000 b) House and Structure There is observed 11 houses along the embankment will be displacement when the project undertaking and there is four types of houses were covered in the RCS: Type 1: Bricks and cement 2 floors construction and equipment are high quality Type 2: Bricks and cement, concrete floor, galvanized Cpack, construction and equipment are high quality Type 3: Type 4: Bricks and cement, concrete floor, galvanized iron Galvanized iron, bamboos and wooden poles

86 Annex 5 W Flo Roof Column Storey Type Material Labor Unit all or Pricing Kip Cost Cost Cpack Brick Concret Concrete Double 1 5.986.000 3.210.000 Ki / 2 9.196.000 Ki / Roof tile Brick Concret Concrete Single 2 2.250.000 950.000 2.250.000 Zinc Brick Concret Concrete Single 3 1.075.000 450.000 1.225.000 Zinc Lumber Wood Single 4 700.000 250.000 950.000 Pictures Type of effected house Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4

Annex 5 87 c) Fence: There are four types of fence were covered in the RCS: Type 1: Brick Wall with 3 m high (100mm) Type 2: Bricks - cement and metal Type3: Concrete post and barbed wire Type4: Concrete post and wood frame Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4

88 Annex 5 d) Irrigation canal: There is only one type of irrigation canal covered in the survey like earth canal Picture of canal: e) Electricity base: There are two types of electricity base such us villagers and public assets are covered in the survey Picture of electricity base: Type 1: Villager s assets compressed concrete Length 6 ml Type: Public assets compressed concrete length 8ml f) Construction Material. TYPE OF ASSETS UNIT Unit Cost, Kip ELECTRICIRY BASE 1 Family pole (6 ml) 1 Pole 1.200.000