IRS Issues Guidance on Single Employer 419 Plans On October 17, 2007, the IRS issued three pieces of guidance warning taxpayers that certain welfare benefit arrangements referred to as "single employer plans" or "419(e) plans" that utilize cash value life insurance may not provide the tax benefits purported by promoters. It also identified some of the arrangements as listed transactions. At the same time the guidance acknowledged that welfare benefit plans that operate within the intent of IRC 419 and 419A and that provide "meaningful medical and life benefits to retirees on a nondiscriminatory basis" are deductible and outside the guidance. The balance of this update examines the guidance. Revenue Ruling 2007-65 This Ruling addressed the deductibility of premiums paid by a welfare benefit fund on cash value life insurance policies. The Ruling concluded that the qualified direct cost of a welfare benefit fund for purposes of IRC 419 and 419A does not include expenditures for premium paid on a cash value life insurance policy if the employer or the welfare benefit fund is directly or indirectly a beneficiary under the life insurance policy. In arriving at this conclusion, the IRS noted that under IRC 419 the amount of an employer's deduction is limited to the sum of the "qualified direct cost," plus any addition to a "qualified asset account" for the tax year. The Internal Revenue Code provides that costs are considered qualified direct costs only if they would be deductible by an employer if the employer paid them directly rather than through a welfare benefit fund. In the explanation of qualified direct cost, the legislative history states that the rules in other Code sections that limit deductions if an employer provides the plan benefits directly are "passed through" to limit deductions with respect to welfare benefit plan contributions. The expenditure for life insurance that would not have been deductible under IRC 264 was given as an example of this limitation. Section 264 provides that no deduction is allowable for premiums where the employer is directly or indirectly a beneficiary of the policy. This material has been prepared to assist our licensed financial professionals and clients advisors. It is designed to provide general information in regard to the subject matter covered. It should be used with the understanding that Prudential is not rendering legal, accounting or tax advice. Such services should be provided by the client s own advisors. Prudential s sole role with regard to any 419 arrangement is that of a product provider. Prudential is not providing the 419 concept. Prudential shall not have any involvement, not even as a product provider only, with regard to multi-employer 419A(f)(6) plans. Additionally, Prudential is neither endorsing the use of the 419 strategy nor the use of any 419 concept sponsor. Life insurance is issued by The Prudential Insurance Company of America and its affiliates. Like most insurance policies, our policies contain exclusions, limitations, reductions of benefits and terms for keeping them in force. A licensed financial professional will be glad to provide you with costs and complete details. Prudential, Prudential Financial, the Rock logo, and the Rock Prudential logo are registered service marks of The Prudential Insurance Company of America and its affiliates. QUESTIONS? CALL ADVANCED MARKETING 2007 The Prudential Insurance Company of America 751 Broad Street, Newark, NJ 07102-3777 IFS-A139722 Ed. 10/07 Exp. 10/09
The Ruling examined two situations. In situation 1, the fund was obligated only to provide group-term life insurance to active employees. The fund purchased policies on each employee, with the death benefits payable to the beneficiary named by the employee and the fund retaining all other policy rights. In situation 2, the fund was obligated to provide disability benefits to active employees. The fund was the owner and named beneficiary of the life insurance policies. The fund paid out $X during the tax year in disability benefits. In both situations, the Ruling held that the fund's qualified direct cost does not include any amount for premiums on the cash value life insurance policies because the employer will be considered a beneficiary under IRC 264 where the welfare benefit fund is either directly (situation 2) or indirectly (situation 1) a beneficiary. In situation 2, the Ruling noted that the qualified direct cost for the fund for the year is $X because if the employer had provided the uninsured disability benefits directly to the employee it would have been allowed a deduction for the $X actually paid during the year. Nevertheless, the Ruling concluded that if the fund purchased life insurance to accumulate assets to pay uninsured disability benefits (uninsured medical or severance benefits, or any other type of uninsured benefit), the employer would not be allowed to deduct, as a qualified direct cost, the contribution paid for the life insurance premium since the employer would not have been able to deduct the life insurance premium. However, the Ruling indicated that some of the employer's contribution could be deductible as an addition to a qualified asset account. Effective Date: The ruling applies prospectively. For employers with tax years ending on or after November 5, 2007 there will be no deduction for contributions for death benefits funded with cash value life insurance. For any tax years of an employer ending before November 5, 2007, if the contribution to a welfare benefit plan would be deductible without regard to the IRC 264, employers sponsoring a death benefit would be able to deduct an amount equal to the amount reported to employees on Form W-2 or 1099. Notice 2007-83 In Notice 2007-83, the IRS announced its intention to challenge the claimed tax benefits for certain arrangements that utilize cash value life insurance to provide welfare benefits such as current death benefit protection, self-insured disability benefits, and/or self-insured severance benefits to active employees. In addition, this Notice identifies the elements of these welfare benefit plans that will be considered "listed transactions" for purposes of the tax shelter rules. In general, this Notice targets arrangements where the employer's contributions are based on premiums charged for a cash value life insurance policy that are large relative to the actual cost of the benefits provided by the plan. In the typical targeted arrangement, the trustee purchases cash value life insurance policies on the lives of the employees who are owners and sometimes other key employees, while purchasing term insurance on other covered employees. The trust may be structured as a taxable trust or a tax-exempt VEBA (voluntary employees' beneficiary association). Under these arrangements, it is anticipated that after a number of years the plan will be terminated and the policies, cash, or other property held by the trust will be distributed to the employees who are participants at the termination. The timing of the termination 2
and the methods used to allocate the assets are structured so that a substantial portion of the trust assets are allocated to the owners and other key employees. The ruling notes that advocates of these plans often claim that the employer is allowed a deduction as a qualified direct cost for its contributions, while nothing is included in the gross income of the business owner/ employee. They may also claim that nothing, or an amount significantly less than the fair market value of the policy, is included in the income of the owner/employee as a result of the transfer of a cash value life insurance policy. The Notice also indicated that some of the targeted plans have been structured with the business owner or employee as the policy owner from the plan's inception, with the employee assigning all or a portion of the death proceeds to the trust. Under these arrangements advocates may claim that no income inclusion is required because there is no transfer of the policy from the trust to the employees. The Notice indicates that the IRS may challenge the tax benefits of the targeted arrangements for various reasons. For example, the IRS may assert that the contributions may be characterized as: dividend income to shareholders, which is includible in the shareholder's income and not deductible by the employer; a plan of deferred compensation subject to Code Section 409A, resulting in immediate inclusion of income for the employee and tax withholding liability to the employer; or a split dollar life insurance arrangement where the employee must include the value of the economic benefits without a corresponding employer deduction. Moreover, in appropriate cases, the IRS indicated its intent to challenge the value claimed on the distribution to the employee. The Notice also stated that even where the facts describe an arrangement that is properly characterized as a welfare benefit fund, no deduction is allowed with respect to premiums paid for life insurance coverage provided to current employees if the employer or fund is directly or indirectly a beneficiary. Further, the deduction with respect to uninsured benefits (disability, medical, etc.) is generally limited to claims incurred and paid during the year, and not based on premiums paid on the life insurance policy. Finally, the Notice provides that as of October 17, 2007, any transactions with all the following elements, and any transactions that are substantially similar, are "listed transactions": 1. The transaction involves a purported welfare benefit trust or fund described in 419(e)(3). 2. The employer's deduction does not rely on the exception regarding collectively bargained plans under 419A(f)(5)(A). 3. The trust or other fund pays premiums on one or more life insurance policies and at least one of the policies is a cash value policy or a policy where the value is accumulated outside of the policy in a side fund or agreement allowing the policy to be converted or exchanged for a cash value policy. 4. The employer has taken a deduction for any taxable year for its contributions to fund benefits provided under the plan (other than post retirement medical benefits, post retirement life insurance benefits, and child care facilities) that is greater than the sum of the following: With respect to uninsured benefits provided by the plan, an amount equal to claims that were both incurred and paid during the tax year; plus amounts paid during the tax year to satisfy prior year claims to the extent not previously deducted; plus the limited reserves allowed under 419A(c)(1) or (c)(3); plus administrative expenses 3
With respect to insured benefits provided by the plan, insurance premiums allocable and paid during the tax year or paid in a prior tax year that is properly allocable to the tax year (other than the life insurance premiums described in "3" above); plus administrative expenses The additional reserve, if any, under 419A(c)(6) relating to medical benefits provided through a plan maintained by a bona fide association to the extent not already included in this paragraph "4" For taxable years ending prior to November 5, 2007 with respect to life insurance benefits provided through policies described in "3" above, the greater of the following amounts: o the amounts reported with respect to the policies on the employees' Form W-2 or 1099 for the year, plus an amount equal to what would have been reportable on the employees' Form W-2 or 1099 but for the exclusion under 79 (relating to the cost of up to $50,000 of coverage); and o with respect to each employee insured under a cash value life insurance policy, the aggregate cost of insurance charged under the policy with respect to the amount of current life insurance coverage provided to the employee under the plan (but limited to the product of the current life insurance coverage under the plan multiplied by the current year's mortality rate provided in the higher of the 1980 or 2001 CSO Tables). In general, if a taxpayer has participated in a listed transaction described in this notice a disclosure statement with respect to the listed transaction must be filed prior to January 15, 2008. Notice 2007-84 In Notice 2007-84 the IRS announced its intention to challenge the claimed tax benefits for certain arrangements that provide retirees medical and life insurance benefits. The IRS warns taxpayers that it may issue further guidance to address these arrangements and that it may apply the guidance retroactively. Finally, the IRS noted that just because an arrangement provides retiree benefits does not mean it's precluded from being a listed transaction under Notice 2007-83 if it also provides active employee benefits. This Notice targets arrangements that purport to provide post retirement medical and life insurance benefits to employees on a nondiscriminatory basis, but in operation primarily benefit the owner and other key employees of the business. Like Notice 2007-83, the targeted arrangements may be structured either as a taxable trust or a tax-exempt VEBA. The Notice states that some of the arrangements involve plans that previously had claimed to be 10-or-more plans under 419A(f)(6). Some involve plans where the actuarial assumptions are not reasonable or reflect assumptions not permitted in the reserve calculations of IRC 419A. Under some arrangements the plan will be terminated prior to payment of the post retirement benefits and the timing of the termination and the method used to allocate the assets are structured so the owners and other key employees will receive a substantial portion of the assets held by the trust. In this regard, the Notice warns employers they cannot obtain a deduction for reserves for post retirement medical or life benefits unless they actually intend to use the contributions for that purpose. The Notice indicated that the IRS may challenge the tax benefits of the targeted arrangements for the same reasons discussed in Notice 2007-83. It may also require that some or all of the deductions taken in earlier years be included into income in a later year in which an event occurs that is fundamentally inconsistent with the premise on which the deduction is based. Finally, the Notice indicated that the IRS 4
intends to challenge the claimed value of property distributed whenever not properly valued and to assess the 100% excise tax under IRC 4976 for distributions of disqualified benefits to owners or key employees. Summary The bottom line of this guidance is that the IRS continues to make it clear that any welfare benefit scheme that provides benefits on a discriminatory manner will not be respected. 5