Update on the July 18 th Tax Proposals. Nathan Wright, LL.B., MTAX, TEP Founding Principal Ph: (416)

Similar documents
Sweeping Proposed Tax Changes to Private Corporations

10/23/17 THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF THE JULY 18, 2017 PROPOSED TAX CHANGES. Prepared for: 2017 CPA FORUM NORTH

Private Company Tax Proposals Now What? November 22, 2017

A plain language review of the proposed tax legislation

Updates to Proposed Changes to Tax Planning for Private Corporations. Lawrence Tam, CPA, CGA Manager, Davidson & Company LLP

TAX PLANNING USING PRIVATE CORPORATIONS

Technical Backgrounder on Measures to Address Income Sprinkling

Taking Action: Revised CCPC tax proposals What you need to know (and do) now

How Finance s new proposals will affect tax planning for private companies. 1 August, 2017

The TOSI Rules What s new?

TOSI FOR ADULTS. CRA Presentation to CPA Canada

New Income Sprinkling Rules What You Need to Know

TAX PLANNING RULES FOR PRIVATE CORPORATIONS. November 23, 2017

Consultation on Private Company Taxation. KPMG Submission to Canada s Department of Finance

Taking Action: CCPC tax proposals What you need to know (and do)

Update on Proposed Small Business Tax Changes. January 2018

What do the new July 18, 2017 Canadian Private Corporation Tax Proposals Mean for You?

Lifetime Capital Gains Exemption and Converting Income Into Capital Gains

The proposal documents contained 137 pages of material and potentially represent a change in tax policy towards private companies.

Recent Tax Developments Impacting Insurance Planning

October 2017 Tax Newsletter

Proposed Canadian income sprinkling rules V2: not many feathers, lots of hissing

What do the new July 18, 2017 Canadian Private Corporation Tax Proposals Mean for You?

Proposed Tax Changes Affecting Business Owners August 3, 2017

Recent Developments in Corporate Taxation Post-Mortem Tax Planning A Case Study

Update on the CCPC tax proposals December 2017

Welcome: Proposed Tax Changes for Private Corporations

CONSULTATION: TAX PLANNING USING PRIVATE CORPORATIONS. BDO CANADA LLP s RESPONSE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE CANADA

For 2016 and subsequent taxation years, various post mortem tax planning strategies will only be available to a Graduated Rate Estate ( GRE ).

Private Company Income Splitting

THE NEW LANDSCAPE OF "INCOME SPRINKLING" DECEMBER 15, 2017 RELEASE

April 21, 2015 CPA CANADA FEDERAL BUDGET COMMENTARY

Where do we now stand on Version 2 of the Canadian Private Corporation Tax Proposals?

Toronto Young Practitioners Group

CTF Policy Conference on Tax Planning Using Private Corporations (September 25, 2017): Questions from Participants

DIVIDEND REGIME FAIZAL VALLI, CA 1

SUCCESSION PLANNING AND THE FAMILY FARM

TOSI AND ALTERNATIVE REMUNERATION STRATEGIES TABLE OF CONTENTS. I. Introduction...2. I. Income Splitting...2 Common Income Sprinkling Structures...

PROPOSED CHANGES TO PRIVATE CORPORATE TAX PLANNING. Presented by: Rob Heron, FCPA, FCA, CFP, ICD.D Allan Sawiak, CPA, CA, CAFA, TEP

CHANGES TO THE INCOME

THE NEW LANDSCAPE OF "INCOME SPRINKLING" DECEMBER 14, 2017 RELEASE

Tax Letter SHAREHOLDER BENEFITS AND LOANS

Current Issues British Columbia Tax Conference Vancouver, BC

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN ESTATE PLANNING: THE ALBERTA ADVANTAGE WHEN USING TRUSTS INTRODUCTION

Finance Canada releases revised income splitting measures

Testamentary Trusts. Presented to: Nakamun Financial Group. February 1, 2008

Tax implications of a life insurance policy transfer

TAX FLASH BULLETIN Federal Budget Highlights

Tax Letter CAPITAL GAINS EXEMPTION AND PROPOSED CHANGES. Example

TAX NEWSLETTER. October 2017

Tax Planning Using Private Corporations

Tax Update August 14, 2017

FEDERAL BUDGET A balanced-budget, low-tax plan for Richardson GMP: Trusted. Canadian. Independent. Tax & Estate Planning

Managing the Sales of Canadian Businesses A Vendor s Perspective

August 2017 Tax Newsletter

INDEX. Segregated funds, Structured pre-1990 contracts, settlements deferred annuities, accrual taxation rules,

Dealing with Private Company Shares at Death Post-Mortem and Insurance Planning

THE JULY 18, 2017 FEDERAL FINANCE PROPOSALS

2018 Proposed Tax Changes. Holm Raiche Oberg Chartered Professional Accountants P.C. Ltd.

TAX LETTER. January 2016

2018 FEDERAL BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS What Professionals and Business Owners Need to Know

Taxation of Trusts & Estates Curriculum

Budget 2018 What does it mean to you?

UNDERSTANDING TRUSTS CONTENTS. What is a trust?

Capital gains and losses. revenuquebec.ca

Subsection 55(2) is an anti-avoidance rule intended to prevent the inappropriate reduction of a capital gain by way of the payment of a deductible

Business Succession Planning 8 th Tax Planning for the Wealthy Family Sept. 20, 2010

Tax & estate planning update. Agenda. GOLOMBEK January Jamie Golombek - Managing Director, Tax & Estate Planning

Managing Your Personal Taxes. A Canadian Perspective

Tax Traps to Remember Joan E. Jung, Partner Minden Gross LLP Michael A. Goldberg, Partner Minden Gross LLP Samantha A. Prasad, Partner Minden Gross

Owner-Manager Remuneration Update

UPDATE. October Did You Know

STEP Tax Tutorial Taxation of Trusts & Estates in Canada November 5, 2014

Recent Developments in Corporate Taxation. Greg Bell, KPMG Chris Jerome, EY 7 June Ottawa

Taxable Income And Tax Payable For Individuals

Strong Leadership: A Balanced-Budget, Low-Tax Plan for Jobs, Growth and Security

Managing Your Personal Taxes. A Canadian Perspective

Navigator. Tax treatment of in-kind asset transfers. The. Will the transfer trigger capital gains or losses? Please contact us

The Joint Committee on Taxation of The Canadian Bar Association and Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada

2016 STEP CANADA CRA ROUNDTABLE

CONTENTS OF CHAPTER 4. Taxable Income And Tax Payable For Individuals

The RBC Dominion Securities

Federal 2018 Budget Changes to Impact Dental Professionals

INDEX. pro-rating, 11

Capital Gains and Losses

Taxation on the Transfer of Farm Business Assets to Family Members R.W. Gamble

Corporate Tax Planning With Insurance (Dealing with Double Tax on Private Company Shares at Death)

INCOME ATTRIBUTION RULES AND GIFTING - PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS

2016 Federal Budget Federal Budget March 22, RBC Wealth Management Services

2015 FEDERAL BUDGET SUMMARY

CONTENTS VOLUME II VOLUME I. The detailed contents of both Volume I and II follow. The textbook is published in two Volumes:

Death & Taxes When Life s Two Certainties Collide. Shaun M. Doody

The Corporate Asset Transfer Plan

AUTISM AND ESTATE PLANNING

Chapter Five Review Questions and Answers

The Estate Freeze: Balancing Tax Incentives with Fairness & Simplicity. Nicholas depencier Wright

TAX NEWSLETTER. July 2018

TAX, RETIREMENT & ESTATE PLANNING SERVICES. Registered Education Savings Plans (RESPs) THE FACTS

CONTENTS VOLUME II VOLUME I. The detailed contents of both Volume I and II follow. The textbook is published in two Volumes:

Estate Planning and the Use of Trusts CONTENTS Page Estate Planning Fundamentals 1

Transcription:

Update on the July 18 th Tax Proposals Nathan Wright, LL.B., MTAX, TEP Founding Principal Ph: (416) 203-8338 E-mail: nwright@spectrumlawyers.ca

July 18, 2017 Proposed Changes On July 18, 2017 Finance Minister Morneau announced changes to the Canadian tax system. The announced changes were marketed as being aimed at improving fairness in the tax system by closing loopholes and addressing tax planning strategies using private corporations. The announcement targeted the following: 1. Income (Dividend) Sprinkling and multiplying the lifetime capitals gains exemption (LCGE); 2. Converting Dividend Income into Capital Gains (known as Surplus Stripping ); and 3. Passive Investment Income earned by a Canadian Controlled Private Corporation (CCPC). The government held a consultation period until October 2, 2017, wherein it solicited feedback from the public, interested groups and tax practitioners. 2

October 2017 Updates In mid-october 2017, the government released updates with respect to the July 18 proposals. The government announced that: 1. It would not move forward with the measures targeted at the LCGE (http://www.fin.gc.ca/n17/17-097-eng.asp); 2. It would simplify the measures targeted at income sprinkling (http://www.fin.gc.ca/n17/17-097- eng.asp); * 3. It would not move forward with the measures relating to the conversion of income into capital (http://www.fin.gc.ca/n17/17-100-eng.asp); and 4. It would proceed with measures to limit investments in private companies (http://www.fin.gc.ca/n17/17-099-eng.asp). On December 13, 2017, the government released revised legislation with respect to income sprinkling. 3

Example of Income Splitting (i.e., TOSI) (Prior to Jan 1, 2018) Mr. A $90,000 dividend $10,000 dividend Mr. A s Son (15 years old) Opco - Mr. A owns 90 percent of common shares of Opco; his 15-year-old son owns the remaining 10 percent. - During 2017, Opco pays a $100,000 dividend on the common shares. - Mr. A s son has no other sources of income. - Under the pre-jan 1, 2018 TOSI rules, the $10,000 dividend to Mr. A s son would be caught and would be subject to the highest personal tax rate (53.53%) with no personal tax credits. - With this particular fact pattern, the result is the same under the post-december 31, 2017 TOSI regime. 4

Income Caught under Pre-Jan 1, 2018 TOSI Currently, the TOSI applies to a specified individual s split income for a year. A Specified Individual is a person who has not reached the age of 17 before the beginning of a year and who has a parent resident in Canada. Split income generally includes: - dividends on private company shares; - income from a partnership or trust that is derived from a business, profession or rental activity of a related person; - Capital gains on the sale of private corporation shares by a minor to non-arm s length persons. Both definitions for Specified Individual and Split Income have been expanded under the post- December 31, 2017 TOSI regime. 5

December 13, 2017 Legislation New TOSI Regime Specified Individual + Split Income = TOSI Unless: - Deemed disposition on death - Disposition of QSBC or QFP shares - Inherited property exceptions (under 25) - Property received on separation - Related business exemption (18 or older) - Excluded business exemption (18 or older) - Excluded shares exemption (25 or older) - Reasonable return exemption (25 or older) - Safe harbour capital return exemption (18 to 24) - Arm s length capital return exemption (18 to 24) New rules are effective as of January 1, 2018. 6

Expansion of Split Income The following types of income can be split income: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Private company dividends and shareholder benefits; Partnership or rental income if derived from a related business; Trust income if derived from private company shares, a related business or related rental activities; Interest income from trust, partnership, or corporation; and Income or capital gain from the disposition of a property associated with the above. 7

Specified Individual (a) (b) Adult who is resident in Canada at the end of the tax year (or immediately before death); Under the age of 18 with a parent resident in Canada at any time in the year. Essentially all Canadian residents (with few exceptions) will be considered a Specified Individual. Relevant part of the analysis focuses on whether the individual has earned split income and, if so, whether there is an excluded amount that can be deducted. 8

Excluded Amount (Good) Amounts that would otherwise be split income are excluded if they qualify as an excluded amount. There are several types of excluded amounts which are available based on the age of the Specified Individual or the spouse of the Specified Individual. If < 18 then: (a) Property inherited on death of parent (up to age 24); (b) Property inherited on death of anyone if enrolled full-time or disabled (up to age 24); (c) Capital gain on death; and (d) Capital gains that qualify for the capital gains exemption. If 18 24 then (a) through (d) plus: (e) Related business exemption; (f) Excluded business exemption; (g) Safe harbor capital return exemption; and (h) Arm s length capital return exemption. If > 24 then (c) through (h) plus: (i) Excluded shares exemption; and (j) Reasonable return exemption. If spouse of Specified Individual >64 (or deceased) and spouse was/is actively involved in the related business (k) Spousal exemption 9

Related Business (Bad) - Requires a Source Individual, which means an individual who is: (a) Resident in Canada; and (b) Related to the Specified Individual. - Related includes: parents, grandparents, spouses, common law partners, brothers, sisters, grandchildren, great grandchildren, in-laws, but does not include nieces, nephews, aunts, uncles. 10

Related Business (Bad) - A Related Business means: (a) Business carried on by the Source Individual; (b) Business carried on by a partnership, corporation, or trust where Source Individual is actively involved; (c) Business of a partnership where a Source Individual owns an interest; and (d) Business of corporation where Source Individual owns 10% or more of the value. 11

Excluded Business (Good) - A business where a Specified Individual is actively engaged on a regular, continuous and substantial basis in either the current year (does not apply to taxable capital gains) or past 5 years. - Deemed to be actively engaged on a regular, continuous and substantial basis if the individual works an average of 20 hours per week during the portion of the year that the business operates. - Past contributions flow-through on death (i.e., beneficiary will be deemed to have been actively involved if deceased was actively involved). - The explanatory notes state that once the 5-year test is met then it is met forever regardless of future involvement. 12

Regular, Continuous and Substantial Basis (2 Tests) (1) Factual test will depend on: - Nature of involvement; - Nature of business; - Time, work, energy devoted to the business; - Management of the business; and - How integral the services are to the business. (2) Bright-line 20 hours-per-week test 13

Capital Contribution Exemptions (1) Safe Harbour Return Exemption (18 24) - TOSI is reduced by the amount equal to the highest prescribed rate for the year (currently 1%) multiplied by the capital contribution to the business (note that capital received from non-arm s length persons counts as capital contributed). (2) Arm s Length Return Exemption (18 24) - TOSI is reduced by a reasonable return having regard to arm s length capital contributed to the business (note that labour, risks assumed, etc. are not considered). - Capital cannot have been received by a related person (other than on death), derived from a related business, nor borrowed from any source (including arm s length lenders). (3) Reasonable Return Exemption (>24) - Not defined = many unanswered questions. - Not limited to capital contributed. - Factors to consider: - Work performed by the individual; - Property contributed by the individual; - Risks assumed by the individual; - Amounts previously paid to the individual; and - Other relevant factors. 14

Reasonableness Test - Not clear whether historical contributions can be considered or whether only current year contributions count. - Compare to relative contributions of related persons not an arm s length test as previously released in July 18 th proposals. - Extremely broad discretion given to CRA (i.e., any other relevant factors). - How to define assumed risks? - How to value work performed? 15

Excluded Shares (>24) Excluded Shares means shares owned by a Specified Individual where: (a) Less than 90% of the corporation s business income for the last tax year was from the provision of services. Problem: service business not defined. (b) Corporation is not a professional corporation. Not surprising (c) Specified Individual directly owns shares representing at least 10% of votes and value of the corporation. Problem: shares owned by a trust don t count and not clear if votes/value can be separated into different classes. (d) All or substantially all of the corporation s income for the last tax year is not derived (directly/indirectly) from another related business (i.e., rental income). Problem: what about dividends received by Holdco from Opco? * Allowed up to the end of 2018 to meet the 10% votes/value requirement. 16

Converting Income to Capital Gains Capital Gains vs Dividends Assume that there is $1,000,000 of cash in a corporation to be distributed and the individual is taxed at the highest marginal tax rate. Amount to be distributed Capital Gain Eligible Dividend Non-Eligible Dividend $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Tax Rate 26.76% 39.34% 45.30% Tax Payable $267,600 $393,400 $453,000 Amount received by individual $732,400 $606,600 $547,000 As a result of Finance stating that they will not be moving forward with the proposed changes to 84.1 and new 246.1, there appears to be a window of opportunity to implement planning whereby dividend income is converted into capital gains. Although case law has generally been in the taxpayer s favour, there is risk that the CRA will look to apply GAAR in certain cases. 17

Inter-Vivos Pipeline Strategy The July 18 th Proposals targeted what is referred to as a pipeline, which is used as part of a strategy for converting dividend income into capital gains. That portion of the proposals was subsequently dropped. Mr. A Create capital gain to increase ACB Mr. A Opco Sell at FMV (taxed at 26%) Amalgamate Holdco Opco Repay note Dividend/share redemption/loan - Mr. A deliberately triggers gain on Opco shares using s.85 (referred to as an internal 85), where Mr. A can elect the amount of proceeds and determine the amount of capital gain. - Mr. A does not claim capital gains exemption to offset capital gain. - Mr. A sells Opco shares to Holdco in exchange for promissory note. - Opco pays dividends to Holdco or shares are redeemed. - Holdco uses funds to repay promissory note to Mr. A over time (2-5 years). - Opco remains a separate and distinct entity for at least one year. - Opco continues to carry on business in the same manner. 18

Post-Mortem Pipeline Strategy Mr. A (deceased) Capital gain taxed at 26% Estate Estate Repay note Disposition ACB = FMV Opco Opco Dividend/share redemption/loan Holdco - The Estate of Mr. A sells Opco to Holdco in exchange for a promissory note. - Opco is not wound up or amalgamated for at least one year. - Promissory note is repaid over time (2 to 5 years). Opco Amalgamate 19

New Regime for Passive Investment Income The government has not release any draft legislation with respect to how passive income will be taxed differently. The government is considering approaches that meet the following conditions: - Preserving the intent of lower tax rates on active business income earned by corporations, which is to encourage growth and job creation; and - Eliminating the tax-assisted financial advantages of investing passively through a private corporation and ensuring that no new avenues for avoidance are introduced. On October 18, 2017, the government announced that it would proceed with a new regime for passive investment income, but reassured taxpayers that: 1. All past investments and the income earned from those investments will be protected; 2. Businesses can continue to save for contingencies or future investments in growth; 3. There will be a $50,000 threshold on passive income in a year (=$1,000,000 in savings, based on a nominal 5% rate of return); 4. Incentives will be developed to ensure that Canada s venture capital and angel investors can continue to invest. 20