VILLAGE OF RANTOUL & PEER COMMUNITIES TAX AND FEE REVENUE COMPARISONS

Similar documents
City of Sultan Utility Services

Chapter 9 SIMPLIFIED MUNICIPAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS TAX 1. As used in this Chapter 9, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

Sewer Rates. General Information Sheet. July 18, 2017

WATER AND WASTEWATER FUND REVENUES

CHAPTER 26 MUNICIPAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE FEE

FPUA REVENUE SUFFICIENCY ANALYSIS Rate Study Update

Stormwater Utility Report #2 April 5, 2016

RESOLUTION CONNECTION CHARGES, PLANT INVESTMENT FEES, AND UTILITY RATES FOR WATER AND SEWER SERVICE

VILLAGE OF MENOMONEE FALLS 2019 PROPOSED BUDGET OVERVIEW

FY Annual Budget: Mobility Solutions, Infrastructure, & Sustainability

MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES - GENERAL FUND

CHAPTER 36 TAXATION ARTICLE TITLE PAGE

VILLAGE OF. Illinois. Financial Planning & Reporting Process. Planning. Reporting. Annual Budget. Monthly Treasurer's Report

ST GIL 05/14/2015 TELECOMMUNICATIONS EXCISE TAX

510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, Illinois Administration and Finance (847) or

Rates Effective 1/1/2018 Water Residential and Commercial Charges CPI not applicable to base and consumption rates for Rates Effective 1/1/2017

Proposed 2017 Tax Levy

ORDINANCE # NOW THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Ferndale do ordain as follows:

Village of Oak Park, IL Department of Finance. Quarterly Finance and Performance Report 2016, 1st Quarter

2017 Mid-Year Financial Report

Glacial Lakes Sanitary Sewer & Water District Utility Rate Study. Shelly Eldridge Ehlers Jeanne Vogt - Ehlers

FY15 APPROPRIATIONS. Specific highlights for the General Fund, Special Capital

Capital Region Water. Water and Wastewater Rate Study Report. November 22, Capital Region Water Water and Wastewater Rate Study

CITY OF STONE MOUNTAIN 875 Main Street Stone Mountain, Georgia ANNEXATION STUDY 2016

FY Budget Update

FY 2019 Approved Budget Approved by the Board of Directors on March 1, 2018

Quarterly Budget Report

CITY OF CHANUTE. Department of Utilities. Utility Information Rates and Fees. Utility Payment Options INDEX. Title Page. Key Telephone Numbers 2

Available Fund Balance $ 5,268,755 $ 4,551,743 $ 5,442,764 $ 5,442,764 $ 3,411,136

Why Do We Need More Millage?

FY 2018 Revenue Manual CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Departmental Summary FUND/ACTIVITY ACTUAL ADOPTED AMENDED ADOPTED General Fund: Revenue Administration

City Services Appendix

Public Works Department

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

City of Des Moines. Sanitary Sewer and Solid Waste Enterprise Funds. November 19, 2018

BUDGET DRAFT 1 November 19, 2019

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM K-1

City of Buffalo Water and Sewer Rate Study. Nick Anhut Jessica Cook

REQUEST FOR BIDS. For RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION

COMPREHENSIVE COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN ANALYSIS

REFUSE COLLECTION COST OF SERVICE STUDY CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 25, 2017

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY

Draft Budget

Revenue Plan. August 12, Dennis Davies Deputy Director of Public Works 200 Civic Center Way El Cajon, CA 92020

Total Current Revenue: $450 million Current need: $1.12 Billion Funding Deficiency: 60%

City of Apple Valley Popular Annual Financial Report

VILLAGE OF TOLONO CHAMPAIGN COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO TAX LEVY ORDINANCE

Capital and Debt. Capital Expenditures 2017 to 2021 Capital Plan. Capital Plan Introduction. PSAB Tangible Capital Asset Five year Capital Plan

5::BASE CASE FINANCIAL MODEL

CHAPTER 36 TAXATION ARTICLE I - GENERALLY

WATER, WASTEWATER, AND RECLAIMED WATER RATE STUDY Public Meeting to Review Study Results. January 5, 2016

Final Report Review of the Fiscal Year Revenue Estimates Included in the Proposed Operating Budget for the City of Dallas

Budget Message Fiscal Year

Champaign Community Unit School District #4. District Financial Presentation. Tier II Committee Meeting June 2, 2016

Proposed Rate Changes

Introduction to Water and Sewer Fund Needs August 11, 2017

City of San Carlos Sewer Financial Plan & Rate Update

Waste Management - Columbia County Operations Rates for Columbia County Residential Services Effective July 1, 2017

To: Mayor and City Council Through: Bill Monahan, City Manager. Subject: Proceeding with the ESCO Process

DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN ANALYSIS. San Antonio Water System. San Antonio Water System 21 MAY 2015 PREPARED FOR

SEPTEMBER, 2013 FIFTEEN. (data for FY ) CITY/COUNTY COMPARISONS. Henrico County, Virginia

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM K-1

Inspector: Glenn Pitman G. Pitman Consulting Inc

UTILITY RATE STUDY. Public Hearing

CITY OF DANVILLE Danville, Illinois. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION April 30, 2015

Capital Region Water Proposed 2019 Budget and Rates. November 20, 2018

Capital Construction and Debt Service. Dallas Love Field. General Aviation Facilities - Dallas Executive Airport and Vertiport

Village of Upper Brookville Garbage Hauler Business License and Permit Application For the Year 2019

Actual TOTAL $ 2,793,103 $ 3,115,212 $ 3,206,457 $ 3,296,810

The CES improved methodology documentation and supporting calculations

Fiscal Year Mid-Year Budget Status Report

WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER, AND MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY

Infrastructure Services. Infrastructure Services

Brunswick Crossing Special Taxing District City of Brunswick, Maryland

DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 656 ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING USER RATES. Rates Effective May 1, 2019 This Ordinance No. 656 Supersedes Ordinance No.

FTE 1 Table Year (proposed) # Budgeted FTE s

An Integrated Water and Sewer Utility Planning and Rate Study for October 4 & 5, 2011

Proposed Budget. Fiscal Year Revenue Overview

ORDINANCE NO AMENDING THE CITY OF ROCKSPRINGS UTILITY CODE ORDINANCE NO , , , 2008,

C I T Y O F P R O P O S E D A N N U A L B U D G E T F I S C A L Y E A R A U G U S T 4,

Budgeting for Municipal Enterprises

Sagaponack Village Budget Message From Don Louchheim, Mayor April 9, 1018

Village of Rantoul, Illinois

LOCAL TAX COMPARISONS A Survey of Rates for Major Local Revenue Sources in Selected Virginia Cities and Counties for the Fiscal Year

Village of Skokie. Fiscal Year 2012 (FY12) Budget Presentation. April 6, 2011

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM K-1

MADISON METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT Madison, Wisconsin. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2016 and 2015

510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, Illinois Administration and Finance (847) or

THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF ALERT BAY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2013

Policy CIE The following are the minimum acceptable LOS standards to be utilized in planning for capital improvement needs:

Wastewater Rate Study. Villa Park, Illinois

Revenue Overview FY 2019 PROPOSED BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS. County Board Work Session February 28, 2018

Big Chino Water Ranch Project Impact Analysis Prescott & Prescott Valley, Arizona

Capital Improvements

City of Fayette Water/Sewer Utility Application PO Box 28, 11 S. Main St., Fayette, Iowa

WEST RANKIN UTILITY AUTHORITY CONTINUING DISCLOSURE ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 THE AUTHORITY

CITY OF GEORGETOWN, SOUTH CAROLINA

RAYMORE, MISSOURI 100 Municipal Circle Raymore, Mo. (816) City of. August 15, 2016

SYCAMORE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA February 4, 2013

Transcription:

VILLAGE OF RANTOUL & PEER COMMUNITIES TAX AND FEE REVENUE COMPARISONS

INTRODUCTION RANTOUL VS. COMPARISON CITIES 1. Bloomington 2. Champaign 3. Danville 4. Mahomet 5. Normal 6. Paxton 7. Rantoul 8. Urbana The Village of Rantoul is working hard to expand opportunities for future growth and development. Numerous issues such as aging infrastructure and the loss of the former Chanute Airbase have helped lead to a stagnant economy. One of the many options to help address these issues is to consistently reevaluate the village s tax and fee structure. This document is a cross comparison of taxes and fees levied by peer communities that are both home rule and non home rule that have similar in population or services offered. By looking at these peer communities, the mayor and trustees can make better informed decisions using the village s attributes and existing tax and fee structures for guidance.

POPULATION & SQUARE MILES OF LAND Population 80001 60001 40001 20001 4,473 7,258 13,037 33,027 41,518 54,664 76,610 81,055 Size, Diversity & Services Matter: Population and Sq. Miles 1 The peer group for this comparison is made up of a set of cities that are unique in population size and in some cases square miles of land served. 20 10 4 8.63 9.44 Population Sq. Miles of Land 17.5 18.15 12 22.43 22.51 Using a group of peer cities, each with its own diverse population and economy, will help Rantoul to determine in certain areas if the village should consider generating additional revenues. These decisions, in part, can be based on how the other communities with similar or dissimilar attributes currently have their taxes and fees structured. 0 Sq. Miles of Land

PROPERTY TAX Danville Rantoul Property Tax $1.44 $2.06 Property Taxes Generally speaking, the higher the assessed property values, the lower the overall tax rate. To sum, wealthier communities with higher property values are able to generate the same amount or more revenue from lower rates as less wealthy communities. Urbana Champaign Paxton Bloomington Normal Mahomet $1.35 $1.35 $1.24 $1.08 $.0925 $.086 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Property Tax Medium Home Value Owner-occupied Champaign $148,400 (10-14) 47.6% Mahomet $195,900 (10-14) 81.3% Paxton $91,900 (10-14) N/A Danville $66,000 (10-14) 58% Urbana $148,600 (10-14) 36.4%* Rantoul $84,700 (10-14) 49.2% As you can clearly see, the median home values in Rantoul are significantly lower than peer communities. Overall the village s tax rate is the second highest, only behind Danville. Given the lower property values, lack of significant new construction and increasing pension costs, this is one area the village needs to look to address and find ways to reduce. *Home to U of I

HOME RULE SALES TAX Mean Home Rule Sales Tax 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 2.25% 2.5% 2.5% 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 Home Rules Sales Tax Looking at the Home Rule Sales Taxes, Rantoul has a comparable rate to other communities that are home rule. Overall, Rantoul s Sales Tax rate is below the average home rule sales tax rate of 2%. However, when looking at communities where there is considerable economic leakage (Champaign & Urbana), Rantoul has the same home rules sales tax rate. 0 Champaign Rantoul Urbana Danville Bloomington Normal 0 Home Rule Sales Tax Average

TELECOMMUNICATION TAX 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Mean Local Telecommunication Tax 5.5% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% Telecommunication Tax Telecommunications Tax Telecommunication taxes are levied by the State of Illinois and by each city. The types of telecommunication which are taxable include, but are not limited to, messages or information transmitted through use of local, toll, or wide are telephone services; private line services; channel services; telegraph services; teletypewriter; computer exchange services; cellular mobile telecommunication services; specialized mobile radio; stationary two-way radio; paging services; any other form of mobile or portable one-way communications; and any other transmission of messages or information by electronic or similar means. The State of Illinois imposes a 7% tax rate and regulates the Local Telecommunications Tax rate for cities and it cannot exceed 6%. Most communities in the peer group, including Rantoul tax at the max rate making the overall rate 13% for residents.

LOCAL MOTOR FUEL TAX Local Motor Fuel Tax.06.05.04.03.02.01.00 Mean Local MFT.05.05.05.04.04.04 Bloomington Champaign Normal Danville Rantoul Urbana MFT Average MFT 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 Aside from State of Illinois shared Motor Fuel Tax funds, the local MFT is the only major funding source used to help repair and upgrade transportation projects that are vital to business and everyday activities for the village. The only communities that can be compared are other home rule jurisdictions as non-home rule communities are not allowed to adopt such a tax. Rantoul adopted it s local MFT in October 2015 and levies $.05 per gallon as compared to the average of $.04 per gallon for the other communities. This tax has consistently surpassed monthly projections and Rantoul s gas rates are similar or lower than other communities including non-home rule communities without such a tax. Given the number of projects the village plans to undertake in the foreseeable future, raising the MFT is a viable option for increasing revenues if gas prices remain low.

GARBAGE FEE $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $14.20 Mean Garbage Fee $24 $18 $25 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 Garbage/Recycling Collection Fees Residential Only Most of the communities in the subject group do not offer a single hauler service such as Rantoul s. The only communities that have a comparable services are listed to the left. Because each community is different and each level of service is different, finding comparable for this category is difficult. The different array of services offered includes curbside refuse pick-up, curb side recycling, lawn and yard waste pick-up and community clean-up activities. $5 Rantoul Normal Danville Bloomington Garbage Fee Average Garbage Fee $5 As you can see the average monthly rate is $20, which Rantoul remains well below. The monthly rate in Rantoul is $14.20. For this residents get weekly curb side pick-up, twice per month curb side recycling pick-up, yard waste removal and pick-up and an annual community clean up day.

STORM WATER UTILITY FEE $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 Mean Storm Water Utility Fee $4.94 $5.14 $4.60 $4.24 $4.35 Rantoul Bloomington Normal Champaign Urbana Storm Water Utility Fee Average Fee $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 Storm Water Utility Most communities across the state are beginning to seriously considering instituting a storm water utility fee as a way to fund storm water infrastructure upgrades within their jurisdictions. These fees ensures the creators of the storm water runoff help to directly pay for the costs associated with upgrading and maintaining this important infrastructure. This fee is preferential to funding through taxes, such as a property tax levy, because with this tax, exempt entities such as government facilities that contribute to the system don t help to fund it s maintenance and upkeep. Typically the formula for the storm water utility rates starts with creating an equivalent residential unit or ERU as a baseline. This is a measurement of impervious area on a property that restricts the drainage of water into the soil. The Village of Rantoul uses this formula for commercial and industrial properties and is based off of the ERU set for residential properties. The other communities use an ERU formula for their residential property rates. As you can see the village is lower than all the other comparable communities with this fee.

WATER RATES Water Utility Rates $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 Mean Water Rates $48.79 $49.89 $33.14 $38.15 $19.22 $19.70 $24.95 Water Rate Average $59.26 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 About half of the communities in the comparison group own their own water treatment and distribution systems, while the other half are served by an investor owned utility. When looking at water rates it s important to compare treatment types, age and condition of the distribution system and weather it s IVO or municipally owned and operated. Typically municipally owned systems are able to offer lower rates than those owned and maintained by an IVO. The typical monthly bills shown in the chart to the left is based on an average consumption of 3,000 gallons per month. As you can see Rantoul s rates, compared to region average is low, event with the new water rate structure approved last year. The village has done a good job keeping of utilizing long-term debt to fund capital infrastructure projects in an effort to keep overall rates lower. This comparison sheet does not compare overall fiscal health of the utility, only average month residential bills.

WASTE WATER RATES Mean Waste Water Rates Waste Water Utility Rates $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $30.05 $20.00 $20.02 $20.14 $21.15 Wastewater Rate $38.91 $39.20 Average $59.07 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 Other than Paxton and Rantoul, the other peer communities are members of regional sanitary sewer districts. These districts typically operate the treatment facilities and large interceptors while the communities operate the smaller collector sewers that connect the homes and the businesses. When looking at the waste water rates, like with water rates, it is important to compare treatment types, age and condition of the interceptors and treatment types. As you can see Rantoul s rates are well below the peer group average and some of the lowest rates in the region and state. It is also important to note that sanitary sewer districts have the authority to levy property taxes to help fund their systems. The Village of Rantoul does not do this. Finally, the village has done a good job utilizing long-term debt to fund capital infrastructure projects in an effort to keep overall rates low. This comparison sheet only takes into account average monthly residential bills and does not compare overall fiscal health of each utility.

ELECTRIC RATES (1,000 KW) $130 $125 $120 $115 $110 $105 $100 $108.51 Mean Electric Bill (Winter Months) $124.19 $124.38 $124.71 $119.00 $120.52 $115.95 $116.27 $140 $130 $120 $110 $100 $90 $80 $70 $60 Electric Utility Rates (Residential) Of all the comparison communities, Rantoul is the only one that owns and operates it s own electric generating and distribution system. The other communities are served by either an IOU or local CO-OP. Although Rantoul s wholesale electric rates (through IMEA) have increased since 2007, they are still lower compared to comparison utilities. As you can see, the average winter bill, based on 1,000 kw of usage, for a residential property in Rantoul is less than the comparison average and lower than all the other communities in the group. Rantoul owning it' electric utility has many of the same advantages as owning the water utility, including more control over costs, rates are more reflective of political will and more reliable local service. As with it s water and waste water infrastructure, the village has done a great job tracking and raising rates as needed and using those funds to reinvest in the utility infrastructure.

CONCLUSIONS Opportunities for Revenue Enhancements After evaluating and comparing each community in the peer group, Rantoul has the ability to raise revenues in the following areas: 1. Garbage Collection Fee 2. Motor Fuel Tax 3. Utility Rates, specifically storm water fees Areas to consider decreases in fees or taxes in an effort to spur additional development 1. Property Taxes