DoD Blended Retirement System Proposal

Similar documents
Financial Counselor/Educator Training for the Blended Retirement System of the Uniformed Services Course Transcript

Blended Retirement System

Reserve Officers Association Legislative Update. 6 December Patrick Air Force Base, Florida

Blended Retirement System Opt-In Course Transcript

Blended Retirement System Opt-In Course. Facilitator s Guide. 31 January 2017

The Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission s Blended Retirement Plan: Implications for Marine Corps Force Management Objectives

Introduction to the Blended Retirement System

The Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission s Blended Retirement Plan: A First Look at Marine Corps Implications

Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission (MCRMC)

Military Experience in Congress

Military Retirement: Background and Recent Developments

Retirement Plan Selection Guide for new members

Military Retirement: Background and Recent Developments

Military Retirement: Background and Recent Developments

Blended Retirement System (BRS) Quick Reference Guide

Military Retirement: Background and Recent Developments

Retirement Plan Design Study

White Paper. The Blended Retirement System: Continuation Pay Comes at a High Price for America s Career Military Families

ISSUE BRIEF. Both the House of Representatives and the Senate National Defense Authorization Act: Stuck on Compensation and Retirement Reform

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL THESIS

CHIEF NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU INSTRUCTION

Military Retirement: Background and Recent Developments

Virginia Retirement System Modernization and Pension Reform Changes

THE CURRENT MILITARY RETIREMENT SYSTEM: REDUX

Modernizing the Military Retirement System

What s New for You? NSIPS Blended Retirement System Service Member Self-Service Capability

BLENDED RETIREMENT SYSTEM

Blended Retirement System Opt-In Course

Military Retirement: Background and Recent Developments

The BrightScope/ICI Defined Contribution Plan Profile: A Close Look at 401(k) Plans, 2014

An old proverb states that success. Military Retirement Reform. A Case Study in Successful Public Sector Change

Military Retirement: Background and Recent Developments

Civil Service Pension Reform: The Experience of the Thrift Savings Plan

WISCONSIN RETIREMENT SYSTEM (WRS)

Phased Retirement: In Brief

Military Retirement: Background and Recent Developments

VRS Overview. Presented to the IPMA-VA HR Director s Retreat. November 16, 2012 Robert P. Schultze, Director

Key Facts. SNAPSHOT: The Kansas Public Employees Retirement System. Overview

Study Guide for 2011 ChFEBC Renewal Exam

YOUR BENEFIT HANDBOOK

GAO. MILITARY RETIREMENT Proposed Changes Warrant Careful Analysis

Executive Retirement Benefits Practices

Higher Education Retirement Decision Guide

SNAPSHOT: Virginia Retirement System

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL

Federal Employees Retirement System: Legislation Enacted in the 111 th Congress

Retirement Benefits for Members of Congress

Learning About NYSTRS

For More Information

Retirement Plan. Summary Plan Description

Comparing Retirement Program Alternatives

For More Information

Accenture United States New Pension Plan. Summary Plan Description. (Effective May 31, 2016)

Jill Stetzer, CPLP Senior Human Resources Training Specialist. Tom Turner Senior Human Resources Specialist

The BrightScope/ICI Defined Contribution Plan Profile: A Close Look at ERISA 403(b) Plans, 2013

Planning for Retirement

The Secure Annuities for Employee (SAFE) Retirement Act of 2013

Estimating the retention effects of Continuation Pay

Getting Ready to Retire Guide for Hybrid Members. Helping you plan for tomorrow, today

United States Air Force Reserve. I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e. Retirements

SNAPSHOT: Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System. Key Facts. Overview

Member s Guide to: DROP. Deferred Retirement Option Plan.

PENSIONS AND RETIREMENT PLAN ENACTMENTS IN 2012 STATE LEGISLATURES. August 31, 2012

SNAPSHOT: Public Employee Retirement System of Idaho. Key Facts. Overview

InFRE Retirement Plan Administrator Series Review Fundamentals of Retirement Plan Design. Presenter Mary Willett, Willett Consulting

Overview of TRS and ORP

Six Simple Steps: Reforming the Illinois State Universities Retirement System

SNAPSHOT: Florida Retirement System

SNAPSHOT: New Hampshire Retirement System. Key Facts. Overview

Federal Employees Retirement System: Benefits and Financing

BACKGROUNDER. The men and women who serve AMERICAN DREAM. Improving Health Care and Retirement for Military Service Members and Their Families

Statement before the Conference Committee on Public Employee Pensions State Capital Sacramento, California

AIR COMMAND AND STAFF COLLEGE DISTANCE LEARNING AIR UNIVERSITY BLENDED RETIREMENT SYSTEM; EFFECTS ON PHYSICIAN RETENTION

CHAPTER 68 OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

SNAPSHOT: State Employees Retirement System of Illinois. Key Facts. Overview

Review of Retirement Benefits for Public Employees in Virginia

Reforming Military Compensation

Federal Employees Retirement System: Budget and Trust Fund Issues

Legislative Update. Presented by. Military Officers Association of America

Choosing Your Retirement Plan

SNAPSHOT: Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Servicemembers' and Veterans' Group Life Insurance Handbook TABLE OF CONTENTS

Comparing Tier 2 Plans

Recent VRS Changes and the New Pension GASB Standard. VGFOA Fall Conference October 17 th, 2012

Regions Financial Corporation. Retirement Plan. Summary Plan Description

SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION

First Command Educational Foundation Standard Financial Presentations May 2018

SNAPSHOT: Employees Retirement System of Georgia. Key Facts. Overview

PLD. Member Handbook. MainePERS Benefits for Participating Local Districts. mainepers.org. August 2010

TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM FOR STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS YOUR RETIREMENT BENEFITS

Federal Employees Retirement System: Benefits and Financing

PLD. Member Handbook. Participating Local Districts. MainePERS Benefits for

REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION RETIREMENT PLAN FOR ASSOCIATES SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION

BNSF Retirement Plan (Pension Plan for Salaried Employees) 2

SNAPSHOT: Iowa Public Employees Retirement System. Key Facts. Overview

The Compensation Issue

Summary Plan Description. for the. Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc. Protective Services. Retirement Plan

Federal Employees Retirement System: Budget and Trust Fund Issues

Key Facts. SNAPSHOT: Montana Public Employees Retirement System. Overview

Noblis Retirement Program. Summary Plan Description

Transcription:

DoD Blended Retirement System Proposal BLUF: While cognizant of proposals offered by the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission (MCRMC) and others, DoD s plan was crafted by considering ALL elements of current and potential retirement schemes and building a blended system that - in the military judgement of the Department of Defense - best enables us to maintain the readiness of the All-Volunteer Force (AVF). The Department considered retirement changes holistically in the context of the larger recruiting, retaining, and retirement continuum, and also within the context of the package of compensation reform included in the 2016 Budget. We also considered the need to retain talent in an increasingly competitive labor market. The Department s proposal is a blend of a 20-year cliff-vested defined benefit annuity with a defined contribution plan that allows service members to contribute to a portable Thrift Saving Plan (TSP) account. It also adds a new variable cash incentive that can be used to influence retention decisions and provide additional income during a service member s career. Under this proposal, for the first time, the Government will automatically contribute to service members TSP accounts and institute a program for matching their contributions. Additionally, the proposal sustains our solemn commitments to those retired because of a medical disability and to survivors. Background: The current defined benefit military retirement system is a significant incentive in retaining a career military force and has served us well for decades. Changes to the system have been infrequent and incremental; our proposal is, and will be perceived as, a momentous change to a tried and true system. For the first time, Service members will automatically, upon entry, contribute to their retirement plan from their current compensation. This change will ensure that more Service members leave the Service with retirement savings. The Department began seriously studying a blended retirement system in 2011. The multiyear research was shared with the MCRMC and helped inform the current Department proposal. While the Department was familiar with the proposals of the MCRMC and others, our proposal was crafted by examining ALL elements of current and potential retirement schemes and building a blended system that best enables our ability to recruit, retain, and retire the future AVF. The Joint Chiefs analyzed the details of the current and potential retirement systems and made specific recommendations to the Secretary of Defense. Those recommendations adhered to the Department s established tenets: Assess impacts to the health of the AVF Grandfather all currently serving (Active and Reserve) and Retired Service members Preserve a nearly equivalent 20-year lifetime benefit at neutral or cost savings

Each component of our proposed blended system has been carefully crafted to enable the Department to best maintain the readiness of the AVF, in the context of the recruiting, retaining, and retirement continuum while recognizing the imperative to provide some retirement benefit to a greater portion of the force than today. Key Attributes: Our recommended blended retirement system has three key attributes: Approximately 85% of Service members who enter the force will receive some form of a portable retirement benefit; Future Service members will receive 80% of the current defined benefit (pension) if they serve for 20 years as well as the opportunity to achieve nearly equivalent or better retirement benefits when they reach retirement age; and This plan enables us to recruit and retain our superb All-Volunteer Force in the 21 st Century. Specific Tenets of the DoD blended retirement system proposal: DEFINED CONTRIBUTION (DC) One element of motivation to modernize the military retirement system is to provide some retirement benefit to those who serve less than 20 years. DoD s proposal creates a defined contribution using the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP). With the addition of this element, approximately 85% of Service members will receive some retirement benefit. Defined DoD contributions. DoD will establish for each Service member a TSP account and automatically contribute an amount equal to 1% of a Service member s basic pay (or Inactive Duty Pay for a Selected Reserve member) into that account upon entry into the service until separation or retirement. Vesting would occur upon completion of 2 YOS. TSP member enrollment. Service members will be automatically enrolled in TSP upon entry, with 3% of their basic pay going into their account. Service members will be able to reduce their contributions or disenroll from TSP only after completion of financial literacy training at their first permanent duty station. TSP: Roth or Traditional. When auto-enrolled upon entry, service members would be enrolled into a ROTH TSP account, a vehicle particularly beneficial to junior members who tend to have lower income tax liabilities. Changes can be made upon receipt of financial literacy training at the first permanent duty station. DoD matching contributions to TSP. DoD will match service member contributions up to 5% of their basic pay. DoD matching would start upon completion of 4 YOS and continue to separation or retirement. DC vesting of DoD contributions. Vesting occurs upon completion of 2 YOS. This would ensure that approximately 85% of Service members would receive some measure of retirement benefit. About 15% of Service members attrite between enlistment and completion of 2 YOS. TSP for cadets/midshipmen. Cadets and midshipmen do not receive basic pay and thus would not be eligible to establish and contribute to TSP while attending a Service Academy.

ROTC cadets and midshipmen, who receive subsistence stipends, not basic pay, are not eligible to establish and contribute to TSP while attending ROTC. DC forfeiture. Service members will forfeit in TSP DoD s automatic 1% contribution, matching contributions, and any proceeds derived therefrom, in case of any punitive discharge (Dishonorable Discharge, Dismissal, Bad Conduct Discharge) from the service. The member s own contributions are not affected. DEFINED BENEFIT (DB) To resource the costs associated with the new DC benefit, DoD s proposal includes a modified DB. Consistent with the other existing proposals, this affects 20% of the existing DB or said another way 80% of the existing DB is unchanged. The combination of the DC and DB provides the opportunity for every Service member to achieve the same or better total retirement benefit when compared to the current military retirement system. DB vesting. 20 YOS. No change from the current DoD retirement system and no different than other proposals under consideration. DB multiplier. 2% (compared to 2.5% today) - no different from various proposals under consideration. DB working-age annuity. Full annuity. DoD s proposal does not provide for a lump sum option; in addition to being a smart financial decision in very limited circumstances, the interaction between a lump sum and both Survivor Benefit Plan and Disability Retired Pay is complex. Recognizing that a lump sum option may provide earlier access to the defined benefit for Reserve Component (RC) members, it remains a smart financial choice in very limited circumstance. Proposed computation methodologies (i.e., using discounted present values) result in relatively small lump-sums, while forgone annuities are significant. DB retirement age. N/A for Active Component (AC). 60 years of age for RC. DB COLA. The Department s plan provides for restoring the full Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) for working-age retirees, as part of comprehensive retirement reform. As the law exists with the current retirement system, real savings over the next 10 years from COLA-1% are modest for DoD accruals and zero for mandatory outlays. Even in the steady state (a hundred years from now), COLA-1% will only save $1.1B (in FY16 $) per year in outlays. In contrast, the DoD s proposal with full COLA will achieve real tangible savings in DoD accruals over the 10 years ($8.1B, FY17-26) and $14.1B in annual mandatory outlay savings in steady state (2118). DB vesting flexibility. Vesting in the DB would be 20 YOS in all cases. DoD s proposal does not provide flexibility to allow the Department to change the 20 year requirement for specified career fields. While the Department generally views flexibility favorably, none of the Services foresee using this authority, the potential difficulties in execution outweighed any perceived benefit, and bonus authority is seen as better able to meet unique needs of specific career fields.

DB Disability Retired Pay. DoD proposes no change to the current disability retired pay. For disability retirement, with a minimum 30% disability rating required, service members may choose between their disability rating (capped at 75%) or the existing DB 2.5% multiplier, multiplied by YOS. This prevents more senior members (those with greater than 12 YOS) from receiving less in a disability retirement annuity (based on the drop in the defined benefit multiplier) than the current system; and does so at the same cost as the current system. CONTINUATION PAY (CP) DoD modeling and experience indicate that any reduction to the defined benefit, and particularly one of this magnitude, will have negative retention impacts. To counter these impacts, DoD created Continuation Pay, a form of retention pay. While not part of a Service member s retirement benefit, CP is essential to restore existing force retention profiles and maintain the current AVF. CP multiplier (months of basic pay). The Services will each determine when, to whom, and how much continuation pay is offered, and the additional service obligation required. The maximum CP multiplier shall be 22 for AC, 11 for RC; the minimum required additional service obligation shall be 1 year. Continuation Pay YOS. Services may offer continuation pay anytime between 8-16 YOS. OTHER ELEMENTS Opt-in. All members serving on the day before the effective date of the new retirement system will be grandfathered into the current system, but will also have the opportunity to opt-in to the new, blended retirement system. All service members must opt-in within 2 years of the effective date of the new system. This allows for adequate financial literacy training, and completion of any deployments. Reentrants will have the remainder of the optin period, or 60 days, whichever is later, to opt-in. A decision to opt-in is not reversible. Cadets and midshipmen attending a Service Academy before the effective date of the new blended system, would be treated as reentrants and allowed 60 days from the date of their commissioning to make a decision whether to opt-in to the new system or remain in the current system. ROTC cadets and midshipmen would be treated similarly. Effective date. The effective date is January 1, 2018. This allows for adequate education and training of the force (especially career counselors), as well as the time required to develop and field additional financial training programs and tools (e.g., retirement calculators), and, to plan, program, test, and deploy a host of complex changes to myriad pay and personnel systems. Percent of force receiving benefit. Approximately 85% of the force would receive some retirement benefits under DoD s proposal and start long-term retirement savings, which would put them on par with their peers in the broader American workforce.

Savings (steady state, 4% match). DoD s proposal will achieve real tangible savings to DoD over 10 years ($8.1B, FY17-26) and $14.1B in annual mandatory outlay savings in steady state (i.e., in 2118). Annual DoD budget savings in steady state (2048) are projected to be $1.19B. The change to a blended retirement system is a key step in modernizing the Department s ability to recruit, retain and maintain the talent we require of our Future Force. We know future service members will require more choice and flexibility in compensation and retirement. Furthermore, these changes provide additional options for the Department to attract and manage a military force that requires ever increasing diverse and technical skill sets in an evolving global economy.