Rating Methodology - Toll Road Projects [In supersession of Rating Methodology - Toll Road Projects issued in June 2017]

Similar documents
RATING METHODOLOGY FOR DEBT ISSUES OF TOLL ROAD PROJECTS

Rating Methodology - Private Power Producers

Rating Methodology - Port Projects [In supersession of Rating Methodology Port Projects issued in June 2017]

Rating Methodology - Banks

CARE s Fund Credit Quality Rating Criteria

Rating Methodology - Manufacturing Companies

Claims Paying Ability - Insurance Companies

Rating Methodology - Housing Finance Companies (HFCs)

Rating Methodology: Factoring Linkages in Ratings (Parent-Subsidiary Link, Group Support, Government Support)

CARE s Rating Methodology - Wholesale Trading

Ratios Financial Sector

Services in MSME Segment

Rating Methodology Hybrid Annuity Road Projects

Central Bank of India

ICICI PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUND (Revised) August 08, 2018

SHIVA INDUSTRIAL SECURITY AGENCY (GUJARAT) PRIVATE LIMITED JANUARY 19, 2017

Gayatri Projects Limited

ICICI Prudential Capital Protection Oriented Fund III-XII. July 26, 2017

Binani Cement Limited

Ganapati Builders Limited

C.M.Builds Private Limited November 03, 2017

Services in MSME Segment

Rating Methodology for Port Projects Background

L&T Infrastructure Finance Company Limited

Raipur Power and Steel Limited August 21, 2018

ICICI Securities Primary Dealership Ltd.

Coimbatore Capital Limited January 6, 2017

HDFCs Assignment Of Receivables Of SEP 11. [Originator: HDFC Limited]

L&T Infrastructure Finance Company Limited

Bansal Construction Works

Khagaria Purnea Highway Project Limited

Emaar MGF Land Limited

Sai Engicon and Construction Private Limited December 17, 2018

Millenium Steel India Private Limited

JMS Mining Services Pvt Ltd

L&T Finance Ltd. (erstwhile Family Credit Ltd) July 7, (Rs. crore) 16,500

Assotech Realty Private Limited

Jaiprakash Associates Limited

Hindustan Construction Company Limited

HDFC Bank Ltd. May 8, 2017

Aircel Limited. November 16, Amount (Rs. crore) 17,479 (Rupees Seventeen Thousand Four Hundred and Seventy Nine Crore Only)

Global Offshore Services Limited

IL&FS Infra Asset Management Limited October 10, 2018

Panyam Cements and Mineral Industries Limited January 6, 2017

Tapadia Polyesters Private Limited

Coimbatore Capital Limited

Kripa Telecom. March 23, Rating 1. CARE A4; ISSUER NOT COOPERATING* (A four)

Nakia Trust 2018 (Originator: Suryoday Small Finance Bank Limited)

India Infrastructure Finance Company Ltd October 06, 2017

Central Bank of India

Madhya Bharat Power Corporation Limited

New Delhi Municipal Council

Bhilangana Hydro Power Limited

International Print-O-Pac Limited

Sunil Hitech Engineers Ltd.

Rock Regency Hotels Private Limited June 25, 2018

L&T Finance Ltd (erstwhile Family Credit Ltd) July 23, 2018

Panchshil Infrastructure Holdings Private Limited

Jindal Power Limited

Mahalaxmi Roller Flour Mills

K.P. CHACKO & SONS JUNE 30, 2017

Laxmi Diamond Private Limited

Press Release. JMS Mining Services Private Limited April 05, Ratings. Facilities Amount (Rs. crore) Ratings 1 Rating Action

P R R Travels July 18, 2018

CARE s FUND CREDIT QUALITY RATING CRITERIA

G.D. Goenka Private Limited

CARE s Rating Methodology For Banks

Shyam Sel & Power Limited January 04, 2017

Kalimati Motors Private Limited

Greenko Energies Private Limited

Sharekhan Financial Services Private Limited

Brookefield Real Estates and Projects Private Limited November 05, 2018

Users of this rating (including investors, lenders and the public at large) are hence requested to exercise caution while using the above rating(s).

Bannari Amman Sugars Limited January 13, 2017

Housing and Urban Development Corporation Limited May 24, 2018

RSB Transmissions (I) Limited January 20, 2017

JMC Projects (India) Limited

Oriental Bank of Commerce

CARE Ratings revises rating outlook of six public sector banks

Shriram Housing Finance Limited

Rating Criteria For Small and Medium Enterprises

TLT Engineering India Private Limited

C&S Electric Limited April 6, 2018

IL&FS Transportation Networks Limited (Revised)

Unidrug Innovative Pharma Technologies Limited

Asahi Songwon Colors Limited

National Collateral Management Services Limited May 5, (Rs. crore)

Spykar Lifestyles Private Limited

Press Release. publications.

Shriram Housing Finance Limited September 10, 2018

NORTHERN ARC 2018 MFI ASHWATHAMA (ORIGINATOR: CHAITANYA INDIA FIN CREDIT PRIVATE LIMITED)

Waaree Energies Limited

RHC Holding Private Limited

Dalmia Bharat Limited

Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Limited (Revise) October 25, (Rs. crore) *

Pix Transmissions Ltd January 04, 2019

Ceigall India Limited

Vivriti Windu (Originator: Fusion Microfinanceprivate Limited)

India Infoline Housing Finance Limited

Press Release. Rating 1. Rating Action. CARE A1+ (A One Plus) Reaffirmed

Transcription:

[In supersession of Rating Methodology - Toll Road Projects issued in June 2017] CARE s rating methodology for debt issues of road projects is designed to facilitate appropriate credit risk assessment, keeping in view the characteristics of the Indian road sector. CARE Ratings examines the following critical areas while rating the Road Projects: Overview of the project CARE Ratings examines the broad parameters of the project based on the detailed projects are port submitted the client. The major areas covered are: The nature of the project and its scope: By-pass, Lane expansion, Additional Bridge, Road modernisation etc. Project Sponsors. Location of the project. Traffic demand and pricing study from a reputed consultant. State of the local economy. Implementation schedule. Provisions in the Concession Agreement (CA) Engineering Procurement and Construction (EPC) Contractor and terms of the contract Operation & Maintenance (O & M) agency and terms of the contract Regulatory risk in case of state highways projects Environmental and social impact Project financing structure Credit enhancements Demand analysis, Competition and Toll pricing The viability of the road project is critically dependent on the extent and nature of benefits enjoyed by the users of the facility and their willingness to pay for the same. CARE s analysis focusses on traffic demand and potential variation of demand due to economic changes and competition. The linkage of demand to toll pricing and the users willingness to pay is also examined critically. CARE gives more importance to track record of actual toll collection of operational projects and connecting stretches to operational projects.

Demand Analysis Demand analysis involves analysis of the toll road region in terms of economic strength and diversity. For this, regional wealth indicators like level of industrialisation, availability of facilitating infrastructure etc. are examined. A sound and growing local economy assures a high level of commercial and business travel, the mainstay for revenue generation. Demand analysis is crucial as wrong estimation of demand or deterioration in the economic base would adversely affect viability and debt servicing capability of a project. CARE Rating s traffic demand analysis is based on studies carried out by traffic consultants who are reputed with adequate experience. The nature and composition of traffic as well as volatility of traffic due to business cycles, natural factors (floods, landslides, etc.), social unrest and escalation in fuel prices is studied critically. While commercial traffic tends to serve as a stabilising force, CARE Ratings would favorably consider a balance between commercial and private vehicle traffic. Commercial traffic is less sensitive to toll increases than private traffic, since additional cost (tax deductible), can be passed on to customers. As a general rule, a diverse traffic mix cushions the impact of a decline in any one segment. Competition Toll roads are generally developed in areas with high traffic density to ease traffic congestion or cut down on distance between destinations. This is to justify levy of tolls, either on account of savings in distance or time, or both. Toll roads may encounter little competition in the initial years. However, subsequent development of toll-free roads can divert traffic away from a toll facility and disturb the projected traffic growth and subsequent revenues. In such a case, the capital programmes of the appropriate state, regional and local authorities are examined to factor in any possible competing facility. Covenants in the Concession Agreement (CA) which explicitly prohibit the government from setting up competing facilities upto a stipulated period will mitigate diversion risk of the project to a large extent. Toll pricing Appropriate toll pricing, which is based on user s willingness to pay is crucial for the success of any road project. Typically, a toll road project would result in benefits in form of (i) savings in vehicle operating costs (VOC), (ii) savings in time and (iii) savings in distance covered. CARE Ratings considers savings in VOC as the most important criteria in determining the users willingness to pay. A Concession Agreement which provides for automatic revision with pre-defined formula for revision in toll rates e.g. linkage to inflation index along with requisite authority to the project 2

directors to implement toll rate revisions is considered as a credit strength for the project. An important prerequisite in this regard is favourable socio-political climate for revision of tolls and such decisions being shielded from normal political processes. Project implementation risk The risk associated with implementation of a road project can be quite high considering the long gestation period and large investments required. CARE Ratings analyses the following factors to estimate the risks associated with the completion of the project. The extent of tie-up for finance The capability of the SPV to raise additional resources in case of cost over-runs The capability of the Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) contractor, based on technical and financial strengths as well as past experience. Status of land acquisition Dependence of the project on access roads or connecting roads not under the direct control of the project directors. The risk of these roads not being ready prior to the completion of the project is examined. Environmental, social and political issues. Cushion provided in the financing plan and construction schedule for possible delays Insurance arrangements. Appointment of reputed contractors and use of proven technology increases the chances of successful and timely implementation of the project. Other tools to mitigate construction risks include: fixed-price contracts with suitable clauses to motivate the contractor to complete the project ahead of time; liquidated damages upon delay; performance bonds; a favourable contractor payment schedule, including partial withholding or subordination of contract repayment during construction etc. During project implementation, CARE would monitor the progress vis-à-vis the initial cost and time estimates to determine the effect of variations from schedule on the ability to meet debt servicing obligations. Sponsor evaluation CARE Ratings evaluates the management from different perspectives like financial capabilities, track record in implementing and operating project of similar nature and size and availability of technical manpower. In a road project, management s ability to accurately assess operating and 3

maintenance expenses is important to protect future revenue streams for debt servicing. Managements which are unable to budget funds for maintenance from operating revenues would have to defer repair programmes lead in to poor service quality of the road and consequent lower traffic volumes and thus revenues. CARE Ratings examines the constitution of the Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) company set up for implementing the project and the credentials of the operating management. In case the O&M function is sub-contracted, the credentials of the contractor are evaluated. Evaluation of Concession Agreement (CA) The right to implement the project and to levy and collect tolls emanates from the Concession Agreement (CA). Hence, the terms of the CA are carefully examined, especially those relating to: Tenor of concession and provision of extension of concession period in case of short fall in revenues Levy of tolls and their periodic revision Termination of CA. Issues relating to land acquisition. It is essential that the CA contains sufficient safeguards to provide disincentive to any of the contracting parties to default. Quantum of compensation payments in the event of termination of the CA and their adequacy to repay outstanding debt servicing obligations of the SPV is analysed critically. Covenants allowing assignability of the CA in the event of non-completion or unsatisfactory progress would be viewed favourably by CARE. Some CAs provide the SPV an option for seeking property development rights in case of insufficient revenue generation. This would have a positive impact from a credit perspective. Regulatory risk CARE has observed that ratings assigned to the debt of state highways projects are exposed to regulatory risk in case toll exemption of cars announced by state governments. Government of Maharashtra and Gujarat have already announced toll exemption of cars on state highways over last three years. Although government is required to pay the concessionaire loss of revenue of cars due to toll exemption, delay in finalization of modalities for release of compensation and release of funds from state government exposes projects to cash flow risk. 4

O&M risk CARE Ratings evaluate the O&M risk considering the following factors: Comparison of O&M cost and major maintenance cost of projects with the industry benchmarks arrived through actual expenditure incurred in the similar projects Presence of fixed price O&M contract and credential of O&M contractor Provision for major maintenance reserve and its adequacy to fund actual major maintenance expenditure Number of major maintenance cycle completed and its actual cost Financial analysis of projected operations An in-depth analysis of the projected operations is undertaken to get a clear indication of the SPV s ability to service debt. The analysis would include critical examination of the underlying assumptions, location of possible stress points and the extent of flexibility to tide over difficulties. A sensitivity analysis is carried out to evaluate the impact on debt servicing ability due to changes in assumptions. The financial analysis takes into account the following factors: Financial structure and leverage; Since road projects generate revenue in Indian Rupees, any foreign exchange debt by the project results in exchange risk. Cash flow adequacy; Debt/ Toll collection in comparison to balance loan tenor Debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) and interest coverage ratio; Financial flexibility and tail period Adequacy of debt service reserve account(dsra) and clauses related to renewal of bank guarantee before its expiry in case DSRA is created in the form of bank guarantee Provision of cash sweep Restricted payment covenant and clauses in case of actual DSCR is lower than threshold DSCR assumed at the time of funding Credit Enhancement Private road projects in India so far have been either without recourse or with limited recourse to the sponsors. To the extent the project has some form of recourse to a strong 5

sponsor, it serves as a source of credit enhancement. Forms of support may include undertaking to cover cost overruns, cash support in case of any shortfall in repayment of loan, undertaking to provide funds to SPV to maintain a level of DSCR etc. A debt service reserve, fully funded can provide significant protection to bondholders, especially if chances for delays in implementation of increase in toll rates exist. Guaranteed take-out financing via repurchase of bonds by highly rated entities has been used in India to serve as credit enhancement for the initial investors in the bonds. Traffic guarantees and Partial/ full exchange risk cover offered by the government has been used as a source of credit enhancement internationally. Qualified Investments Pending redemption of debt obligations, surplus funds would have to be appropriately invested by the SPV. CARE Ratings examines the proposed investment policies to ensure the safety of such investments. Liquidity aspects of the proposed investments also are considered. CARE analyses each of the above factors and their linkages to arrive at the overall assessment of credit quality. The reduction in credit risk due to any credit enhancements provided is carefully evaluated before assigning the rating. Conclusion: The rating outcome is ultimately an assessment of the fundamentals and the probabilities of change in the fundamentals. CARE analyses each of the above factors and their linkages to arrive at the overall assessment of credit quality of an issuer. While the methodology encompasses comprehensive technical, financial, commercial, economic and management analysis, credit rating is an overall assessment of all aspects of the issuer. [Last updated on August 28, 2018. Next review due in August - September2019] Disclaimer CARE s ratings are opinions on credit quality and are not recommendations to sanction, renew, disburse or recall the concerned bank facilities or to buy, sell or hold any security. CARE has based its ratings/outlooks on information obtained from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. CARE does not, however, guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. Most entities whose bank facilities/instruments are rated by CARE have paid a credit rating fee, based on the amount and type of bank facilities/instruments. 6

HEAD OFFICE CARE Ratings Limited (Formerly known as Credit Analysis & Research Ltd.) 4th Floor, Godrej Coliseum, Somaiya Hospital Road, Off Eastern Express Highway, Sion (East), Mumbai - 400 022. Tel: +91-22-6754 3456, Fax: +91-22- 6754 3457, E-mail: care@careratings.com REGIONAL OFFICE AHMEDABAD 32, Titanium, Prahaladnagar Corporate Road, Satellite, Ahmedabad - 380 015 Tel: +91-79-40265656 Fax: +91-79-40265657 BENGALURU Unit No. 1101-1102, 11th Floor, Prestige Meridian II, No. 30, M.G. Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91-80-46625555 / 46625544 CHANDIGARH SCF No. 54-55, First Floor, Phase 11, Sector 65, Mohali 160062. Tel No. +91-172-4904000 CHENNAI Unit No. O-509/C, Spencer Plaza, 5th Floor, No. 769, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002. Tel: +91-44-2849 7812 / 2849 0811 Fax: +91-44-28490876 COIMBATORE T-3, 3rd Floor, Manchester Square Puliakulam Road, Coimbatore - 641 037. Tel: +91-422-4332399 / 4502399 KOLKATA 3rd Floor, Prasad Chambers, (Shagun Mall Bldg.) 10A, Shakespeare Sarani, Kolkata - 700 071. Tel: +91-33- 40181600 / 02 Fax: +91-33-40181603 JAIPUR 304, Pashupati Akshat Heights, Plot No. D-91,Madho Singh Road, Near Collectorate Circle, Bani Park, Jaipur - 302 016. Tel: +91-141-402 0213 / 14 HYDERABAD 401, Ashoka Scintilla, 3-6-502, Himayat Nagar, Hyderabad - 500 029. Tel: +91-40-69000500-522 Fax: +91-40-40020131 NEW DELHI 13th Floor, E-1 Block, Videocon Tower, Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi - 110 055. Tel: +91-11-4533 3200 Fax: +91-11-45333238 PUNE 9th Floor, Pride Kumar Senate, Bhamburda, Senapati Bapat Road, Shivaji Nagar, Pune - 411 015. Tel: +91-20- 4000 9000 7