Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.

Similar documents
Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.

Econ 101A Final Exam We May 9, 2012.

Econ 101A Final exam Th 15 December. Do not turn the page until instructed to.

Microeconomics I. Undergraduate Programs in Business Administration and Economics

Econ 302 Assignment 3 Solution. a 2bQ c = 0, which is the monopolist s optimal quantity; the associated price is. P (Q) = a b

Today. Applications of NE and SPNE Auctions English Auction Second-Price Sealed-Bid Auction First-Price Sealed-Bid Auction

Economics 101A (Lecture 21) Stefano DellaVigna

Econ 101A Final exam Mo 18 May, 2009.

Introduction to Industrial Organization Professor: Caixia Shen Fall 2014 Lecture Note 5 Games and Strategy (Ch. 4)

Advanced Microeconomic Theory EC104

Exercises Solutions: Oligopoly

AS/ECON 2350 S2 N Answers to Mid term Exam July time : 1 hour. Do all 4 questions. All count equally.

Economics 101A (Lecture 21) Stefano DellaVigna

MKTG 555: Marketing Models

Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions Exam date: August 7, 2017

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 9

Game Theory and Economics Prof. Dr. Debarshi Das Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati.

Games of Incomplete Information ( 資訊不全賽局 ) Games of Incomplete Information

Strategy -1- Strategy

EC 202. Lecture notes 14 Oligopoly I. George Symeonidis

In Class Exercises. Problem 1

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications Final Exam Ronaldo Carpio Jan. 13, 2015

Chapter 11: Dynamic Games and First and Second Movers

Economics Honors Exam 2009 Solutions: Microeconomics, Questions 1-2

Lecture 9: Basic Oligopoly Models

ECON106P: Pricing and Strategy

Econ 323 Microeconomic Theory. Practice Exam 2 with Solutions

Econ 323 Microeconomic Theory. Chapter 10, Question 1

Math 152: Applicable Mathematics and Computing

Université du Maine Théorie des Jeux Yves Zenou Correction de l examen du 16 décembre 2013 (1 heure 30)

DUOPOLY. MICROECONOMICS Principles and Analysis Frank Cowell. July 2017 Frank Cowell: Duopoly. Almost essential Monopoly

HW Consider the following game:

MA200.2 Game Theory II, LSE

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Game Theory (EMBA 296 & EWMBA 211) Summer 2016

Elements of Economic Analysis II Lecture XI: Oligopoly: Cournot and Bertrand Competition

These notes essentially correspond to chapter 13 of the text.

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 4

Game Theory Notes: Examples of Games with Dominant Strategy Equilibrium or Nash Equilibrium

Solution Problem Set 2

When one firm considers changing its price or output level, it must make assumptions about the reactions of its rivals.

In the Name of God. Sharif University of Technology. Graduate School of Management and Economics

ECON 459 Game Theory. Lecture Notes Auctions. Luca Anderlini Spring 2017

Sequential-move games with Nature s moves.

Duopoly models Multistage games with observed actions Subgame perfect equilibrium Extensive form of a game Two-stage prisoner s dilemma

IMPERFECT COMPETITION AND TRADE POLICY

Microeconomics III. Oligopoly prefacetogametheory (Mar 11, 2012) School of Economics The Interdisciplinary Center (IDC), Herzliya

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 4

Game Theory with Applications to Finance and Marketing, I

Answer Key. q C. Firm i s profit-maximization problem (PMP) is given by. }{{} i + γ(a q i q j c)q Firm j s profit

ECONS 424 STRATEGY AND GAME THEORY HANDOUT ON PERFECT BAYESIAN EQUILIBRIUM- III Semi-Separating equilibrium

Noncooperative Oligopoly

Simon Fraser University Spring 2014

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall 2012

UCLA Department of Economics Ph.D. Preliminary Exam Industrial Organization Field Exam (Spring 2010) Use SEPARATE booklets to answer each question

EconS Games with Incomplete Information II and Auction Theory

Francesco Nava Microeconomic Principles II EC202 Lent Term 2010

PAULI MURTO, ANDREY ZHUKOV

Economics 212 Microeconomic Theory Final Exam. April 24, Faculty of Arts and Sciences Queen s University

Problem Set 3: Suggested Solutions

Microeconomics 2nd Period Exam Solution Topics

The Ohio State University Department of Economics Second Midterm Examination Answers

Noncooperative Market Games in Normal Form

Bayesian Nash Equilibrium

Answer Key: Problem Set 4

Econ 8602, Fall 2017 Homework 2

Economics 171: Final Exam

Game Theory Lecture #16

Game Theory Problem Set 4 Solutions

Game Theory and Economics Prof. Dr. Debarshi Das Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati

Microeconomic Theory May 2013 Applied Economics. Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY. Applied Economics Graduate Program.

Auction is a commonly used way of allocating indivisible

Static Games and Cournot. Competition

Answers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average)

Answers to Problem Set 4

Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions Exam date: June 5, 2017

ECON/MGMT 115. Industrial Organization

Not 0,4 2,1. i. Show there is a perfect Bayesian equilibrium where player A chooses to play, player A chooses L, and player B chooses L.

Econ 210, Final, Fall 2015.

Econ 101A Final exam Mo 19 May, 2008.

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2015

d. Find a competitive equilibrium for this economy. Is the allocation Pareto efficient? Are there any other competitive equilibrium allocations?

Microeconomic Theory August 2013 Applied Economics. Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY. Applied Economics Graduate Program

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2017

Name: Midterm #1 EconS 425 (February 20 th, 2015)

Economics 121b: Intermediate Microeconomics Final Exam Suggested Solutions

Simon Fraser University Department of Economics. Econ342: International Trade. Final Examination. Instructor: N. Schmitt

MS&E HW #1 Solutions

Outline for today. Stat155 Game Theory Lecture 13: General-Sum Games. General-sum games. General-sum games. Dominated pure strategies

Honors General Exam PART 1: MICROECONOMICS. Solutions. Harvard University April 2013

Finding Mixed-strategy Nash Equilibria in 2 2 Games ÙÛ

G5212: Game Theory. Mark Dean. Spring 2017

6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 3: Strategic Form Games - Solution Concepts

6.207/14.15: Networks Lecture 10: Introduction to Game Theory 2

EconS Oligopoly - Part 3

EC202. Microeconomic Principles II. Summer 2009 examination. 2008/2009 syllabus

Lecture 6 Dynamic games with imperfect information

DUOPOLY MODELS. Dr. Sumon Bhaumik ( December 29, 2008

GS/ECON 5010 Answers to Assignment 3 November 2005

Games with Private Information 資訊不透明賽局

March 30, Why do economists (and increasingly, engineers and computer scientists) study auctions?

Transcription:

Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013. Do not turn the page until instructed to. Do not forget to write Problems 1 in the first Blue Book and Problems 2, 3 and 4 in the second Blue Book. 1

Econ 101A Final Exam May 14, 2013. Do not forget to write Problems 1 in the first Blue Book and Problems 2, 3 and 4 in the second Blue Book. Good luck on solving the problems! Problem 1. Second-price auction (85 points) Two individuals participate in a sealed bid auction. Individual 1 values the good 1 and individual 2 values it 2 Assume 1 2 Assume that both individuals know their own value, as well as the value for the opponent. The two individuals write their valuation inside a sealed envelope and submit it to the auctioneer simultaneously (that is, they cannot observe the other bidder s bid). The auctioneer assigns the good to the individual with the highest bid at the second highest price. (In the case of tied bids, the auctioneer assigns the good with probability 0.5 to the first player) Remember, this is to a first approximation the auction format used by ebay. Formally, denote by the bid of individual The payoff function of individual is if ( )= ( ) 2 if = (1) 0 if where is the bid of the other player. 1. Explain why the payoff function is given by the expression (1). (5 points) 2. Give the general definition of an equilibrium in dominant strategies and of Nash Equilibrium. (10 points) 3. Show that, no matter what player bids, it is always (weakly) optimal for player to bid that is, ( 1 2)=( 1 2 ) is an equilibrium in dominant strategies (20 points) 4. Using the definitions in (1), conclude that ( 1 2)=( 1 2 ) is a Nash Equilibrium. (10 points) 5. Assume now that players play sequentially. Player 1 bids 1 first, and player 2 bids next after observing the bid 1.Howdowefind the sub-game perfect equilibria in this case? (10 points) 6. Is it a sub-game perfect equilibrium that player 1 bids 1 = 1 and player 2 bids 2 = 2 no matter what the history? Go through all the steps of the argument. (15 points) 7. Consider now a first-price simultaneous sealed bid auction with two players, that is, the top bidder pays his bid. The payoff function of player is if ( )= ( ) 2 if = 0 if Show that ( 1 2)=( 1 2 ) is NOT a Nash Equilibrium for the case 1 6= 2. [Do not attempt to characterize the Nash equilibria, just show that something is not a Nash equilibrium] (15 points) 2

Problem 2. Short questions. (70 points) 1. Cost curves. For each of the following cost functions, plot as well as derive analytically the marginal cost 0 ( ) the average cost ( ) and the supply function ( ): (a) ( ) =10 2 (10 points) (b) ( ) =10+10 2 (10 points) (c) ( ) =5 (10 points) (d) For each of the cost functions above, say what the returns to scale are for the underlying technology and whether there is a fixed cost. (10 points) 2. Game Theory. Compute the pure-strategy and mixed strategy equilibria of the following coordination game. Call the probability that player 1 plays Up, 1 the probability that player 1 plays Down, the probability that Player 2 plays Left, and 1 the probability that Player 2 plays Right. (30 points) 1\2 Left Right Up 3 3 1 1 Down 1 1 2 2 3

Problem 3. Monopoly and Duopoly. (90 points). Initially there is one firm in a market for cars. The firm has a linear cost function: ( ) =. The market inverse demand function is given by ( ) =10. 1. What price will the monopolist firm charge? What quantity of cars will the firm sell? (10 points) 2. Plot the solution graphically: derive and plot the marginal cost, the marginal revenue, and the demand curve, and find the solution. (10 points) 3. How much profit will the firm make? (5 points) 4. Now, a second firm enters the market. The second firm has an identical cost function. What will the Cournot equilibrium output for each firm be? Compare the quantity produced and the price to the monopoly case (10 points) 5. Similarly to what you did in point (2) derive the Cournot solution graphically by plotting the best response curves in a graph with 1 in the x axis and 2 in the y axis how do you find the equilibrium? (10 points) 6. What is the Stackelberg equilibrium output for each firm if firm2enterssecond?(10points) 7. How much profit will each firm make in the Cournot game? How much in Stackelberg? (10 points) 8. Using a graphical plot of the demand function, derive a formula for the consumer surplus as the area below the demand curve and above the equilibrium price. Derive it for the cases of monopoly, Cournot and Stackelberg. Which yields the higher consumer surplus? (15 points) 9. Debate this assertion in light of your answer at the point above: Market power generates consumer losses because it leads to a higher market price. In particular, the welfare losses are linearly increasing in the market price. (10 points) 4

Problem 4. Worker Effort and Altruism. (90 points) Consider the case of case of a firm with employees. The employee chooses the effort The firm pays the employees both a salary and a piece-rate times the units of effort Unlike in the moral hazard case we dealt with in class, in this case the effort is observable by the firm. The firm earns revenue for every unit produced by the worker. The timing is such that the firm first sets the pay package ( ) and then the worker chooses the optimal effort The worker has linear utility over money (that is, is risk-neutral) and thus gains utility + from earnings at the workplace. In addition, the worker pays a cost of effort 2 2 (with 0) from exerting effort at the workplace. Hence the worker maximizes max + 2 2 1. Solve for the optimal of the worker as a function of and. (10points) 2. How does the optimal effort of the worker depend on the piece rate? How about on the flat pay? How about on the cost parameter? Discuss the intuition. (10 points) 3. Consider now the problem of the firm. Remember that the firm revenue is. Thusthefirm seeks to maximize max = ( ) The firm chooses optimally the piece rate and the flat-pay subject to 0 and 0 Plug into the maximization problem the you derived above. First, use a qualitative argument to find the optimal Then take first order conditions with respect to What is the solution? [If you have trouble here, just skip to the next point] (10 points) 4. Let s go back now to the employee problem and consider the case in which the worker is altruistic towards the employer by putting a weight on the profits of the firm, with 0 1. In this case, the worker solves the problem max + 2 2+ [ ] Derive the optimal effort in this case. (10 points) 5. Now we compare the optimal effort with altruism derived in point (4) for 0 1 to the optimal effort without altruism derived in point (1). In doing the comparison, hold constant and also, and Also, assume Which is larger, or? (Remember 0 1) Discuss the intuition. (10 points) 6. How do the two efforts and respond to an increase in the value of the product? Compare the derivatives of and with respect to.discusstheintuition.(10points) 7. Howdothetwoefforts and respond to an increase in the value of the piece-rate? Compare the derivative of and with respect to and discuss which effort is more sensitive to the piece rate. Discuss the intuition. (10 points) 8. Consider now the case of a social planner who aims to maximize overall welfare in the economy. This particular social planner wants to maximize the sum of the utility of the employee and of the firm. Therefore, this planner maximizes + 2 2 +( ) Find the solution for which maximizes this expression. (10 points) 9. For which value of altruism does the solution equate the one set by the social planner? Explain the intuition. (10 points) 5