CHAPTER III COST TRACKING & REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JOHNNY M. HULEIS

Similar documents
CHAPTER III PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF EDWARD J. REYES

CHAPTER VII DIRECT TESTIMONY OF PATRICK MOERSEN (OVERHEADS) ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

CHAPTER III COST TRACKING AND REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UPDATED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF S. NASIM AHMED SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

CHAPTER IV DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

CHAPTER 4 COST RECOVERY AND REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARY LENART ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KHAI NGUYEN ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RYAN HOM (UPDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS REPORT) January 2018

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY (PRESENT AND PROPOSED GAS TRANSPORTATION REVENUE AND RATES)

CHAPTER V PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

CHAPTER 5 REVENUE REQUIREMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN AND RAMON GONZALES ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARY G. LENART (REVENUES AT PRESENT AND PROPOSED RATES) March 2015

REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RONALD M. VAN DER LEEDEN POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING. March 2015

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JAWAAD A. MALIK (POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING) April 6, 2018

CHAPTER X DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MARJORIE SCHMIDT-PINES (RATES) ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

CHAPTER XII DIRECT TESTIMONY OF SHARIM CHAUDHURY ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JOSEPH MOCK SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

CHAPTER VIII DIRECT TESTIMONY OF NEIL CAYABYAB (INSURANCE) ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CHAPTER VII SOCALGAS AMI BUSINESS CASE MODELING METHODOLOGY AND REVENUE REQUIREMENT

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE RATE BASE. November 2014

REVISED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JACK S. LEWIS ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

THIRD REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY (PRESENT AND PROPOSED GAS TRANSPORTATION REVENUE AND RATES) July 31, 2018

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA (REGULATORY ACCOUNTS) November 2014

Subject: Core Pricing Flexibility and Noncore Competitive Load Growth Opportunities Programs

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY (PRESENT AND PROPOSED GAS TRANSPORTATION REVENUE AND RATES) April 6, 2018

January 29, 2018 Advice Letter 5133-G

Company: Southern California Gas Company (U 904 G) Proceeding: 2019 General Rate Case Application: A Exhibit: SCG-46-R REVISED SOCALGAS

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL W. FOSTER ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

PREPARED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF SCOTT R. WILDER ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY (PHASE 2)

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JACK S. LEWIS ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Direct Testimony of Michael G. Wilding

CHAPTER X DIRECT TESTIMONY OF NEIL CAYABYAB ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF EDWARD J. REYES ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF AMANDA D. WHITE SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

ENERGY DIVISION DATA REQUEST REGARDING COST OF OWNERSHIP CALCULATIONS R RULE 21 WORKING GROUP 3 SDG&E RESPONSE

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN (WORKING CASH) APRIL 6, 2018

Exhibit A Affidavit of Alan Varvis

Residential Line and Service Extension Allowance Testimony. Application No.: Witnesses: C. Silsbee S. Reed J. Schichtl L. Vellanoweth (U 338-E)

REVISED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TODD J. CAHILL ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SECOND REVISED SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KENNETH J. DEREMER (POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING) April 6, 2018

CHAPTER 13 AMI FINANCIAL MODELING. JULY 14, 2006, AMENDMENT Prepared Supplemental, Consolidating, Superseding and Replacement Testimony of SCOTT KYLE

REVISED UPDATED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JASON BONNETT SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TODD J CAHILL ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JONATHAN B. ATUN CHAPTER 4 ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

CHAPTER II NEW CURTAILMENT ORDER PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVE WATSON BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Exhibit SCE-1

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MICHELLE A. SOMERVILLE MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES. November 2014

Testimony of Stephen E. Pickett

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation d/b/a National Grid

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN P. DAIS (WORKING CASH) October 6, 2017 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DAVID L. CHONG

TURN DATA REQUEST-058 SDG&E-SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A /8 SDG&E_SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: APRIL 23, 2018 DATE RESPONDED: MAY 7, 2018

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF ANNETTE M. STEFFEN (MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES) April 6, 2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Public Service Company of Colorado ) Docket No.

SOCALGAS / SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JAMES VANDERHYE (SHARED SERVICES & SHARED ASSETS BILLING, SEGMENTATION & CAPITAL REASSIGNMENTS)

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RANDALL G. ROSE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF SHARIM CHAUDHURY ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (RATE DESIGN)

2018 General Rate Case. Tax Update Rebuttal

Excerpt of D On Test Year 2012 General Rate Case For Southern California Edison Company (Pages 1-5, 13-14, , & )

SDG&E REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF CYNTHIA S. FANG (ELECTRIC RATES AND BILL COMPARISON) JUNE 18, 2018

INDICATED SHIPPER DATA REQUEST IS-SCG-004 SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: FEBRUARY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF ROBERT C. LANE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF NORMA G. JASSO (REGULATORY ACCOUNTS) November 2014

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY REGINA L. BUTLER DIRECTOR ELECTRIC UTILITIES SECTION

Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP Exhibit No. TPC-0079

REVISED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RANDALL G. ROSE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

ORA DATA REQUEST ORA-SDG&E-DR-007-CL8 SDG&E 2019 GRC A SDG&E RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: OCTOBER 26, 2017 DATE RESPONDED: NOVEMBER 8, 2017

RR1 - Page 181 of 518

SOCALGAS REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF JILL TRACY (ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES) June 2015

Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota. Docket No. E002/GR Exhibit (LRP-1) Decoupling

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY Docket No. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No.

2015 General Rate Case

WORKPAPERS TO PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF OMAR RIVERA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. ) Southern California Edison ) Docket No. ER Company )

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM 1910

PREPARED SUPPLEMENTAL TESTIMONY OF SIM-CHENG FUNG SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

TURN DATA REQUEST TURN-SCG-07 SOCALGAS 2012 GRC A SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: MARCH 1, 2011 DATE RESPONDED: MARCH 15, 2011

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MARK A. DIANCIN SHARED SERVICES AND SHARED ASSETS BILLING POLICIES AND PROCESS. November 2014

PREPARED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF HECTOR A. MADARIAGA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Jeffrey L.

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY DOCKET NO.

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF HERBERT S. EMMRICH ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY DECEMBER 2010

SDG&E REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF NORMA G. JASSO (REGULATORY ACCOUNTS) June 2015

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (DESCRIPTION OF THE UNREGULATED SUBSIDIARY AND ITS INTERACTIONS WITH SDG&E)

JOINT SETTLEMENT COMPARISON EXHIBIT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY TEST YEAR 2008 GENERAL RATE CASE

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY Compression Services Application (A ) (2nd DATA REQUEST FROM DRA)

PUC DOCKET NO. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPLICATION OF TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CHAPTER II SUMMARY OF AMI BUSINESS CASE

REVISED WORKPAPERS TO PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RONALD M. VAN DER LEEDEN ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

City of Austin. Billboard Registration Fee Study

TURN DATA REQUEST TURN-SEU GRC A /008 SDG&E/SCG RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: APRIL 5, 2018 DATE RESPONDED: APRIL 27, 2018

RE: Southern California Edison Company s Formula Transmission Rate Annual Update Filing in Docket No. ER (TO11)

Subject: Amendment to Extend Desert Cities Energy Partnership to December 2019

WORKPAPERS TO PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL A. BERMEL ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

TURN DATA REQUEST-038 SDG&E-SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A /8 SDG&E_SOCALGAS RESPONSE PARTIAL #1 DATE RECEIVED: MARCH 28, 2018 DATE RESPONDED: APRIL

National Grid. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation INVESTIGATION AS TO THE PROPRIETY OF PROPOSED ELECTRIC TARIFF CHANGES. Testimony and Exhibits of:

FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY Cost Measurement & Allocation Department Cost Allocation Manual (CAM) 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS. Section Description Page

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA.

Transcription:

Application No: Exhibit No: Witness: A.1-08-XXX Johnny M. Huleis Application of Southern California Gas Company (U90G) to establish a Combined Heat and Power and Distributed Energy Resources Tariff Application 1-08-XXX (Filed August 8, 01) CHAPTER III COST TRACKING & REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JOHNNY M. HULEIS BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA August 8, 01

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PURPOSE...1 II. TRACKING OF DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES...1 III. REGULATORY ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES COSTS... IV. WITNESS QUALIFICATIONS... i

5 6 7 8 PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JOHNNY M. HULEIS I. PURPOSE The purpose of this testimony is to describe the procedures and methods that will be used to protect ratepayers from the costs associated with Southern California Gas Company s ( SoCalGas ) proposed Distributed Energy Resource ( DER ) Tariff from those included in general rates. This testimony will outline: how costs will be tracked; the request to establish a tracking and balancing account; and the regulatory treatment of the DER Tariff assets. 9 10 II. TRACKING OF DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES The cost of completing an activity or project consists of both direct costs, as charged to 11 1 1 1 15 16 17 18 19 0 1 that activity, and a share of indirect or overhead costs. The sum of direct costs and overhead costs make up fully-loaded costs. Direct costs are those activities and services that benefit a specific project, such as salaries of staff employees (labor costs) and materials required for a specific project (non-labor costs). These costs are charged directly to the project since they are readily identifiable and can be directly traced. Overhead costs are those activities and services that are associated with direct costs such as payroll taxes and pension and benefits or are costs which benefit a project but which cannot be economically and efficiently direct-charged. Direct costs are defined as the specific labor and/or non-labor costs of each specific work activity performed in the delivery of the DER Tariff. There are two accounting methods available for capturing the direct costs associated with providing the proposed tariff: (1) direct charging, where the actual labor and non-labor spent in providing or supporting the DER Tariff are recorded; and () allocation, where the costs associated with provision of labor and non-labor activities are determined by formula, such as percentage of some portion of direct costs. 1

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 1 1 SoCalGas will use direct charging as the primary method for capturing direct costs related to the DER Tariff, and since many associated activities are identifiable and can be easily tracked, direct charging is the preferable method to account for the costs. For example, the majority of costs associated with the provision of the DER Tariff will be incremental charges from third-party service providers; these charges will be recorded directly to the appropriate internal order. To properly identify and segregate all costs associated with the DER Tariff, specific internal orders will be created within the SAP financial system. For example, a specific internal order will be created to track the costs associated with an individual DER Tariff customer. This process provides SoCalGas with the accounting data needed to validate that all costs incurred in providing services under the DER Tariff are properly tracked and will be paid for by customers receiving the services. On a monthly basis the internal orders created for tracking DER Tariff projects will be reviewed for cost associated with the use of embedded resources. Any embedded resources charged to DER Tariff internal orders will be credited to a balancing account to reflect the refund due to ratepayers. 15 16 17 III. REGULATORY ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES COSTS SoCalGas is requesting, in this application, the creation of tracking and balancing 18 19 0 1 accounts. The purpose of a tracking account will allow SoCalGas to track the difference between the revenue collected from DER Tariff customers and the actual operations and maintenance and capital-related revenue requirements associated with providing the DER Tariff. The tracking account will be mainly used by SoCalGas to monitor the effectiveness of providing the DER Tariff to customers. The tracking account is not reflected on SoCalGas financial statements. The purpose of the balancing account is to credit ratepayers for any General Rate Case ( GRC ) embedded costs used in providing the DER Tariff. The balancing account will be

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 1 1 15 an interest bearing account recorded on SoCalGas financial statements. Additionally, in each annual October regulatory account balance update filing, SoCalGas will amortize the projected year-end balance effective January 1 of the following year. Additionally, SoCalGas will capitalize the assets used in providing the DER Tariff as non-utility plant. By recording the asset as non-utility plant, the DER Tariff asset will be entirely separated and excluded from rate base assets that are recovered in the GRC, thereby holding ratepayers harmless and having shareholders bear the associated costs. SoCalGas currently authorized 01 GRC filing contains no requests for additional funding for the DER Tariff activities in the test year or any forecasted revenues from offering these services. SoCalGas did not undertake any such activities or incur such costs in the historical period upon which the GRC test year forecast was based. Thus, neither authorized base margin nor general base rates in the 01 GRC are impacted by the DER Tariff costs. Additionally, since the recovery of costs associated with the DER Tariff services will be collected directly from DER Tariff customers, these costs and revenues will be excluded from recovery in SoCalGas future GRC. 16 17 IV. WITNESS QUALIFICATIONS My name is Johnny M. Huleis. My business address is 555 West Fifth Street, Los 18 19 0 1 Angeles, California, 9001. I am employed by SoCalGas as a Principal Business Analyst Supervisor in the Affiliate Billing and Costing department. I hold a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from the University of California at Los Angeles and a Master of Business Administration degree from Pepperdine University. I have been in the Affiliate Billing and Costing department since June 01. Previously, I worked in the Financial and Strategic Analysis department since January 011. In my previous position, my responsibilities include

financial analysis and the development of revenue requirements in support of new investment opportunities. I have not previously testified before the California Public Utilities Commission.