Community Resilience & NFIP s Community Rating system

Similar documents
What are the savings? An Assessment of the National Flood Insurance Program s (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS)

Flood Risk Outreach Tools for Georgia Communities. GAFM 10 th Annual Conference Presented By: Jarrett Mattli

Land Economics 94:2, May 2018 Flood Risk, Local Hazard Mitigation, and the Community Rating System of NFIP, by Jingyuan Li and Craig E.

Role of Disaster Insurance in Improving Resilience: An Expert Meeting The Resilient America Roundtable

10/5/2015. What Makes a Sound Floodplain Management Program? What are the Flood Problems in your Community?

CRS State Profile: Wyoming

National Flood Insurance Program s Community Rating System:

Community Rating System. National Flood Insurance Program

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS) Together North Jersey Resilient Task Force Meeting

LEARNING OVER TIME FROM FEMA S COMMUNITY RATING SYSTEM (CRS) AND ITS LINK TO FLOOD RESILIENCE MEASUREMENT

CRS State Profile: Alaska

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

CRS State Profile: Connecticut

CRS State Profile: Ohio

MUNICIPAL LAND USE STRATEGIES for Improving Flood Resilience

NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE REFORM AS A TOOL FOR MUNICIPAL CLIMATE RESILIENCE ENHANCEMENT

ROI for Joining CRS. Floodplain Management Association Conference. Sacramento, CA. September 2016

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

FEMA FLOOD MAPS Public Works Department Stormwater Management Division March 6, 2018

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

CRS State Profile: Massachusetts

CITY OF PLANTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM NO

ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions. Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

Mitigation Works. 0 With its devastating combination of water, mud, and sewage, the damages caused by flooding are particularly wrenching.

CRS State Profile: Indiana

PUBLIC SURVEY FOR HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING

Chapter 7 Appendix B: National Flood Insurance Program Summary for Kaua'i County, 2015 Update

The National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System: An Introduction and Discussion of the RDO Role. October 2, :00-3:15 pm ET

Hillsborough County Local Mitigation Strategy and the Community Rating System

Flood Risk in the Schuylkill Watershed. Planning for Resilient Communities

Flood Risk and Climate Adaptation: Policy Reforms and Lessons (Being) Learned from Hurricane Sandy

Gerard S. Mallet, Local Mitigation Strategy Coordinator FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN PROGRESS REPORT

Mitigation Success Publications

A Discussion of the National Flood Insurance Program

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Community Rating System: A Comparative Analysis

*How Federal Policy. Causes Flood Disasters. Leslie A. Bond, CFM LA Bond Associates

Flood Insurance Coverage in Dare County: Before and After Hurricane Floyd

Crediting Adaptation Strategies through the National Flood Insurance Program s Community Rating System Coordinator s Manual

Flood Vulnerability Assessment for Critical Facilities. Molly Woloszyn Lisa Graff, GISP, CFM

Floodplain Management Plan

Federal Flood Insurance Changes (National Flood Insurance Program NFIP)

Disaster Insurance: Are States and Insurance Companies Prepared?

Flood: How to Protect Your Business from a Natural Disaster

Flood Insurance THE TOPIC OCTOBER 2012

Moving Policy and Practice from Flood and Coastal Storm Damage Reduction to Risk Management

David A. Stroud, CFM AMEC Earth & Environmental Raleigh, NC

The Community Rating System in Coastal New England: Regional Approaches and Lessons Learned

Reviving the Culture of Preparedness

Aquidneck Island Resilience Strategy Issue Paper 4. Issue: RESIDENTIAL FLOODING

FLOOD RISK AND RISK PERCEPTION: EVIDENCE FROM PROPERTY PRICES IN GEORGIA

SECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGIES

Community Incentives for Nature-Based Flood Solutions

REAL ESTATE FLOOD DISCLOSURE PROGRAM & FLOOD MAP INFORMATION SERVICES

in coordination with Peoria County, Planning and Zoning Department

AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 50: FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT

Flood Risk Review and Resilience Meeting: Allegheny County

Section 2. Introduction and Purpose of the LMS

Integrating Hazard Mitigation into Local Planning to Support Community Resilience on the Mississippi Gulf Coast

REAL ESTATE FLOOD DISCLOSURE PROGRAM & FLOOD MAP INFORMATION SERVICES

Location: Tampa, Florida March 6, 2013

National Capitol Region HAZUS User Group Call

Floodplain Management 101. Mississippi Emergency Management Agency Floodplain Management Bureau

Leveraging the Community Rating System for Climate Adaptation. Southeast and Caribbean Climate Community of Practice Webinar Series 23 March 2015

35 YEARS FLOOD INSURANCE CLAIMS

COMMUNITY RATING SYSTEM (CRS) October 28, 2013

Using GISWeb to Determine Your Property s Flood Zone

Infrastructure Prioritization Framework: Considering Resilience in Infrastructure Investment Decisions

REAL ESTATE FLOOD DISCLOSURE PROGRAM & FLOOD MAP INFORMATION SERVICES

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

TIPS FOR PREPARING TO JOIN SYSTEM THE COMMUNITY RATING. Kristin Owen, AICP, CFM. VFMA Fall Workshops

Mournag, Tunisia. Local progress report on the implementation of the 10 Essentials for Making Cities Resilient ( )

The Changing NFIP, the CRS & Local Governments. Scott Pippin, J.D., M.E.P.D.

4 TH ANNUAL CAPE COASTAL CONFERENCE. Adaptation Planning, Environmental Economics and Community Engagement

Beirut, Lebanon. Local progress report on the implementation of the 10 Essentials for Making Cities Resilient ( )

SECTION V THE LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY BLUEPRINT

Section 19: Basin-Wide Mitigation Action Plans

Flood Risk Management and Nonstructural Flood Risk Adaptive Measures

Birgunj Sub metropolitan City, Nepal

SOUTH CENTRAL REGION MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN. Advisory Committee Meeting September 12, 2012

TERREBONNE PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE

CDBG-DR, BW-12, CRS and Dauphin County, PA: What do they have in common? 2015 ASFPM Annual Conference

Repetitive Loss Area Revisit # 6 Walter Road Area Jefferson Parish

Dade County Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan

Riverine Flooding - Cedar Rapids, Iowa 2008

ELEVATION SUCCESS STORIES

Flood Smart Communities

Sea Level Rise and the NFIP

Floodplain Management Annual Conference Atlanta, Georgia April 2017

Facts & Info regarding the NFIP in Mathews County VA And the Mathews County Floodplain Management Ordinance

Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012

Flood Plain Management Services (FPMS) Program

Attachment B. King County Flood Control Zone District Work Program

Resilience in the Nation s Capital

Coordinating CRS Success on a County Scale. Presented at the 41st Annual ASFPM Conference Managing Flood Risk in the Heartland

A Flood Mitigation Plan for the Non-Tidal N.J. Section of the Delaware River Basin. Warren County Planning Workshop (2 nd Meeting) March 7, 2007

LMS TIMES. Director s Corner. This Issue:

Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Kankakee County, Illinois Executive Summary

Third Appropriation Funding Recommendation

King County Flood Control District Flood Risk Reduction Work Program and Accomplishments

COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS

Transcription:

Community Resilience & NFIP s Community Rating system Ajita Atreya Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center University of Pennsylvania National Association of Counties (NACo) Session on Risk Management Assessment December 3, Colorado Springs

Resilience is a gaining a lot of momentum The economic impact of natural catastrophes is increasing each year and needs attention!

Resilience Definition Resilience is a long standing concept & several definitions are out there ability to adapt bounce back recover manage Overall seen as a desirable property of natural and human systems, including cities and coastal zones (UN/ISDR, 2002) General consensus that resilience is multifaceted that can be achieved via several components (Bureau et. al, 2003, Norris et. al., 2008; Cutter et. al. 2010; NRC, 2010)

How to Measure Resilience? BRIC Baseline Resilience Indicators for Communities measure overall pre-existing community resilience evaluating the community s economic, social, institutional, ecosystem, and infrastructure capacities ResilUS Resilience United States measures recovery over time of critical infrastructures NOAA Coastal Resilience Index help communities predict if they can function well after a disaster in the areas of critical infrastructures, transportation, community plans, mitigation measures, social systems and business plans No systematic way to measure resilience that captures all the key sectors that contribute to community resilience and for which the data is readily available

Framework for Measuring Resilience 5 Capitals (5Cs)- 4 Resilience Properties (4Rs) Capital /Properties Financial Natural Human Physical Social Robustness (strength to withstand) Rapidity (quickly respond) Income/Wealth Insurance Availability Floodplain Conservation Emergency Plans Strength of critical infrastructure and housing to withstand shock Multiple communication sources Proportion of socially vulnerable population Evacuation strategies Redundancy (alternatives availability ) Resourcefulness (capacity to identify priorities) Alternative sources of income Funds set aside in case of emergency Rules and Regulations to limit the use of natural resources Access to Education Availability of alternate routes Availability of materials for restoration Availability of housing options for victims Capacity to address the needs of victims

How can Insurance help In this regard? NFIP s Community Rating System (CRS) as a vehicle to enhance and measure community resilience over time Voluntary incentive program that recognizes and encourages community floodplain management activities through flood insurance premium rates discounts to reflect the reduced flood risk 19 creditable activities under 4 series : Public Information, Mapping and Regulation, Flood Damage Reduction and Warning and Responses A discount in insurance premium of up to 45% can be achieved for SFHA properties

Linking CRS to the 5C framework : Cedar Rapids, Iowa Cedar Rapids Iowa is a class 6 Community Earns a 20% discount for policies in SFHA Many flood risk reduction activities underway that will bring Cedar Rapids to even higher class in next evaluation CRS Activities Credits Capital Resilience Properties Elevation Certificates 48 % Physical Robustness Outreach Projects 11% Social Rapidity, Resourcefulness Hazard Disclosure 18% Physical Resourcefulness Flood Protection Information 12% Social Resourcefulness Floodplain Mapping 8% Financial Robustness Open Space Preservation 11% Natural Robustness Higher Regulatory Standards 14% Physical Robustness/Redundancy Flood Data Maintenance 47% Human Resourcefulness Storm Water Management 10% Physical Rapidity Acquisition and Relocation 58% Physical/Natural Robustness

PERCENTAGE OF MAXIMUM POSSIBLE POINTS Tracking Resilience over time : Cedar Rapids 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Higher regulatory standards (activity 430) Acquisition and relocation (activity 520) YEAR 2011 2014

Success Stories Well Enforced Building Codes Florida Homes built under the new wind resistant standard that were enforced in 1996, following hurricane Andrew in 1992, had a claim frequency that was sixty percent less than those built prior to 1996. Buyouts Tulsa, Oklahoma A class 2 CRS community has cleared more than 900 buildings from its floodplains with average premium discounts of $461 for policies in SFHA Roseville, California The city voluntarily bought out 273 homes in high risk and converted the majority of floodplain to open space. The city is the one and only class 1 CRS community Open Space Preservation King County, WA A class 2 community has preserved more than 100,000 acres in floodplain open space and receives additional CRS credit for maintaining it in natural state

Colorado Springs, CO A class 6 community saving 224,000 on insurance premium annually

THANK YOU Ajita Atreya atreya@wharton.upenn.edu

CRS: Activities and Credit 19 creditable high-level activities, organized under 4 main series Activities Maximum Possible Points Activities Maximum Possible Points 300 Public Information Activities 310- Elevation Certificates 116 320- Map information Services 90 500 Flood Damage Reduction Activities 510- Floodplain Management Planning 622 330- Outreach Projects 350 340- Hazard Disclosure 80 350- Flood Protection Information 125 360- Flood Protection Assistance 110 370- Flood Insurance Promotion 110 400 Mapping and Regulations 410- Floodplain Mapping 802 420- Open Space Preservation 2020 430- Higher Regulatory Standards 2042 440- Flood Data Maintenance 222 450- Storm water management 755 520- Acquisition and Relocation 2250 530-Flood Protection 1600 540-Drainage System Maintenance 570 600 Warning and Responses 610-Flood Warning and Response 395 620- Levees 235 630-Dams 160 Total 12,554

CRS : Credits, Classes and Discounts Note - SFHA: Special flood Hazard Areas (high risk of flood)