Chapter 4 Capital Facilities 2 3

Similar documents
Chapter 4 Capital Facilities 2 3

Chapter 4 Capital Facilities 2 3

Policy CIE The following are the minimum acceptable LOS standards to be utilized in planning for capital improvement needs:

City Services Appendix

Chapter CONCURRENCY

This page intentionally blank. Capital Facilities Chapter Relationship to Vision. Capital Facilities Chapter Concepts

Urban Growth Area Review City of Bellingham Preliminary UGA Growth Allocation Proposal

County-wide Planning Policies

CHAPTER 11. CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ELEMENT

Nassau County 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Capital Improvements Element (CI) Goals, Objectives and Policies. Goal

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT:

Executive Summary 1/3/2018

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT

FINANCIAL POLICIES ADOPTED BIENNIAL BUDGET CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE

CHAPTER 9 CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES

Georgetown Planning Department Plan Annual Update: Background

1. I N T R O D U C T I O N

UNOFFICIAL COPY OF HOUSE BILL Read and Examined by Proofreaders:

PALM BEACH COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

SNOHOMISH COUNTY COUNCIL SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON AMENDED ORDINANCE NO

DEVELOPMENT PHILOSOPHY The recommended budget aligns the County s resources with the Council s identified governing priorities:

Chapter 1: Introduction

Purpose of LOST SALES AND USE TAXATION. Local Option Sales Tax (LOST) Taxation 101 Larry Hanson City Manager City of Valdosta June 26, /16/2017

City of Ferndale PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Strategic Asset Management Policy

1. identifies the required capacity of capital improvements to serve existing and future development based on level-of-service (LOS) standards;

Section 2. Introduction and Purpose of the LMS

GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE

A loyal three made stronger in one. Loyalist Township Strategic Plan ( )

Item Amend Capital Improvements Element

Planning Commission WORKSHOP: General Plan Implementation Program - Task 2 Refining the General Plan Implementation Checklist.

FY19 Adopted Budget Overview

DEVELOPMENT PHILOSOPHY

ACTION STRATEGIES. Aurora Places is the guidebook

Georgetown Planning Department Plan Annual Update: Background

Strategic Planning and Performance Measurement

SHORELINE FIRE DEPARTMENT

IMPLEMENTATION A. INTRODUCTION C H A P T E R

Public Policy Perspectives 2955 Sunset Drive, Bellingham, WA (360)

Capital Improvements

INTRODUCTION. Introduction Page 1 of 5. G:\Comp\Adopted Comprehensive Plans\15. Cylce 16-2 and 16-3\Elements not changed\_d. Introduction.

CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION. Purpose of the Capital Improvement Plan

INTRODUCTION. Why a CIP? What is a Capital Improvement?

2016 Mecklenburg County, North Carolina

Chapter VIII. General Plan Implementation A. INTRODUCTION B. SUBMITTAL AND APPROVAL OF SUBSEQUENT PROJECTS C. SPHERE OF INFLUENCE

King County Flood Control District 2015 Work Program

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT

EAST CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HCP / NCCP MITIGATION FEE AUDIT DRAFT REPORT AND NEXUS STUDY. Prepared For: Prepared By:

Budget Summary. FY17 Total County Revenue Sources. Misc 1.1% Federal 5.2% Gen Prop Taxes 40.3% $2,037,947,949

CITY OF PALM DESERT COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN

Budgeted Funds & Purposes

Chapter 5. REMAINING REVIEW FACTORS

Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District FLOOD CONTROL ZONE 5 ADVISORY BOARD MAY 15, 2014 STAFF REPORT

4.07 Ontario Parks Program

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES. Goal 1: [CI] (EFF. 7/16/90)

APPENDIX D PUBLIC SERVICES LETTERS AND CORRESPONDENCE

FINANCIAL POLICIES Originally Adopted by the City Council on September 15, 2014 Revised on May 2, 2016

GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY AND DEPARTMENT BUDGET DETAIL

Minimum Elements of a Local Comprehensive Plan

MARION COUNTY FIRE RESCUE MASTER PLAN FY

City of Prince Albert YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN

ORDINANCE No. The City of Portland ordains: Section 1. The Council finds:

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. City of St. Augustine Comprehensive Plan EAR-Based Amendments

That the report from the Director of Finance regarding the Strategic Asset Management Policy, dated June 20, 2018, be received; and

Fire. Public Safety D-75

Paul Newman. County Manager CLARK COUNTY, WASHINGTON EXECUTIVE SEARCH PROVIDED BY STRATEGIC GOVERNMENT RESOURCES

Solid Waste & Recycling

District of North Saanich 2019 Dra Budget

WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL Planning and Development Committee. February 25, 2014

Pinellas County Capital Improvement Program, FY2011 Through FY2016 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Proposed FY2018 Budget Presentation

Auditor s Letter. Timothy M. O Brien, CPA Denver Auditor Annual Audit Plan

HERCULES STRATEGIC PLAN 2017

CITY OF LIVINGSTON ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN APPROVED 05 MARCH 2019

This Publica on is produced by the Department of Informa on and Public Affairs and the Fulton County Finance Department. Your Your Service

C APABILITY A SSESSMENT

Section II: Overview of the Annual Growth Policy 1. Background

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL rd Avenue NE, Woodinville, WA

JACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM AMENDMENT 1 FISCAL YEAR 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Budgeted Fund Structure

Grants Accountant. Nature of Work

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Volume I: Countywide General Plan

13.0 Capital Improvements

Goals, Objectives, and Policies Capital Improvements Element

Fiscal Responsibility to Further Invest in the Future. Executive Committee Department of Finance May 4, 2017

Loudoun 2040 Fiscal Impact Analysis Report Loudoun County, Virginia

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS by the CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WA for FIRE STATION 92 DESIGN ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES

Capital Improvements Element

CHAPTER 11: Economic Development and Sustainability

Cumberland County. Strategic Results

Chapter Ten, Capital Improvements Element City of St. Petersburg Comprehensive Plan

General Plan Goals. Vision. More Detail. More Detail. More Detail. More Detail

Updated Planning Commission Work Program ( )

Introduction of the 2019 Proposed Budget December 4, 2018

Stockton Safe Streets April 16, 2013

Honorable Chairman Pat Prescott and the Pamlico County Board of Commissioners:

CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 2017/2018 ADOPTED BUDGET

Combining And Individual Fund Statements And Schedules

BUDGET AT A GLANCE BUDGET OVERVIEW CITYWIDE BUDGET SUMMARY CITYWIDE FTE SUMMARY

Transcription:

Draft March 0 0 Chapter Four Capital Facilities Introduction Capital facilities as defined here, and for purposes of the plan, include facilities owned by Whatcom County and other public entities. Capital facilities typically have long useful lives, significant costs, and are not mobile. Whatcom County capital facilities include buildings, land, parks, and roads (transportation facilities, including roads, are addressed in chapter ). Capital facilities provided by other public entities may be addressedincluded in this plan. by reference. Those capital facilitiesy plans that may be adopted by reference include plans for water, sewer, fire protection, storm water, and schools., parks and recreation facilities. Purpose This chapter contains policies to guide Whatcom County in providing adequate public facilities and services within the county's financial capability, and provides a unifying framework for facilities planning. It also establishes levels of service for certain county-owned and operated capital facilities. The cities and other public owners of capital facilities are encouraged to use the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan as a guide in preparing their own plans and capital improvement programs, particularly with respect to designated urban growth areas (UGAs). Process In, the firm of Henderson, Young and Company (HYCo) was hired to obtain the necessary expertise in capital facilities planning to assist the county in preparing this chapter. Unlike most other chapters of this plan, Capital Facilities did not involve a citizen's committee or a technical advisory committee per se. The functions assumed by committees for other chapters were not required for completion of this chapter. Methodology, however, was needed to bring together technical expertise concerning all county organizational divisions that manage the capital facilities of the county. HYCo provided that methodology. Department and division administrators have been called upon repeatedly to provide detailed information on existing facilities, levels of service, funding, projected improvements, and revenue sources. Through that process, they participated in the plan as an ad hoc technical committee. Because of the complexity of this topic, the County Council went through an exercise to establish preliminary levels of service after receiving recommendations from department heads. After review and input by the public, these preliminary levels of service were finalized. HYCo was responsible for organizing the effort toward completion of this chapter in the original Comprehensive Plan, with much of the actual work performed by Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan -

Draft March 0 0 the Whatcom County Planning Division. This chapter was updated in 0 as part of the seven-year review required under the Growth Management Act and in 0. GMA Goals, and County-Wide Planning Policies, and Visioning Community Value Statements The goals, and policies, and action plans in this chapter contribute to achievement of several of the GMA planning goals, including those considering urban growth, open space and recreation, and public facilities and services. The chapter has been written to satisfy those goals while also meeting the intent and requirements of the County-Wide Planning Policies (CWPP)., and general guidelines of the Visioning Community Value Statements. Although CWPPs do not separately address capital facilities, as defined in this chapter, they are addressed within a number of the policies. Policies requiring fiscal and physical ability to provide adequate public facilities, services, and infrastructure are satisfied in this chapter. The interlocal agreements specified in the policies must address reasonable criteria for annexation and ensure adequate public services including transportation, parks, administrative services and corrections facilities. In relation to capital facilities, the Visioning Community Value Statements emphasize the importance of law enforcement, crime prevention, and other social services, as well as encourage retention and development of recreational opportunities. Growth Management Goals, and Countywide Planning Policies, and Visioning Community Value Statements will be served by adoption of this chapter and implementation of its goals, and policies., and action plans. GMA Requirements The Growth Management Act mandates that counties required to plan under the Act adopt comprehensive plans including an inventory of facilities, a forecast of future needs for such facilities, the proposed location and the capacities of expanded or new facilities, minimum levels of service, of facility capacity, a six-year plan for financing those facilities with indication of sources for that funding, and a requirement to re-assess the Land Use chapter of this plan if there are funding shortfalls. The Land Use element must be consistent and coordinated with the capital facilities plan. with respect to adopted minimum levels of service and adequacy of facilities to serve development. These Growth Management Act requirements are addressed in this chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, the Whatcom County -Year Capital Facilities Plan (Appendix E) and in the Six-Year Capital Improvement Program for Whatcom County Facilities (Appendix F). Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan -

Draft March 0 0 Background Summary Once facility needs or a level of service standard is established, for a particular facility, then a cost can be assigned. to achieve the desired level of service. The next step is to develop funding mechanisms to pay for the needed capital facilities.desired levels of service. Levels of service for different facilities are defined differently. In this chapter, the level of service for most facilities is defined as a unit per population; for example, a fraction of a square foot of office space per capita or a number of jail beds or park acres per,000 population. The major exception is roads, for which level of service is measured as volume over capacity ratios, i.e. how many cars are anticipated to use a particular section of road (volume) divided by how many cars the road can theoretically accommodate over a specific period of time (capacity). Reason for change: The proposed amendments include replacing numerical level of service (LOS) standards for certain facilities with policies supportive of those facilities. Additionally, LOS standards for transportation have been moved to chapter (Ordinance 0-0). One of the major issues confronting Whatcom County in relation to capital facilities is the question of availability of revenue versus ability to provide services. While it is generally desirable to provide high levels of service for roads, law enforcement, and other essential services, costs for those services continue to rise and, generally, new or additional taxes are undesirable. Whatcom County has kept additions to its capital facilities to a minimum over the past ten years (-0) in order to contain the cost of government operations. Whatcom County has relied on a pay-as-you go approach for funding capital expenditures under one million dollars. Large capital acquisitions have been financed with general obligation debt. The 0 budget for debt service is $,,, or one per cent of 0 budgeted revenues of $,,. The GMA expressly authorizes cities and counties to impose impact fees on new development to help finance the capital facilities required to serve new development. This authorization applies only to capital facilities owned or operated by government entities: (a) public streets and roads; (b) publicly owned parks, open space, and recreation facilities; (c) school facilities; and (d) fire protection facilities. Certain background information that must be included in a capital facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan in order to collect transportation impact fees is included in Appendix G. Reason for change: Transportation is addressed in Chapter. If the adopteddesired level of service cannot be achieved without acquiring major debt, raising taxes beyond acceptable levels or establishing unacceptable impact fees, then the level of service standard must be adjusted, facility costs must be reduced, or growth must be curtailed until a balance is achieved. Adjusting land use Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan -

Draft March 0 0 to achieve desirable levels of service standards is one means of attaining concurrency. Concurrency, as required by the GMA, means that adequate facilities as defined by adopted levels of service are available at the time that the impacts of development occur or within a specified time thereafter. The GMA, at minimum, requires concurrency for transportation facilities. Concurrency is obviously desirable for all other capital facilities as well if the overall goal is to provide for new development while maintaining a quality of life that people desire. With regard to fire protection, Whatcom County has not adopted level of service standards (NFPA or any other response-time based level of service) for most urban or rural areas. The County should define an urban level of service for fire protection during the required -year comprehensive plan review and update process. The -year plan review and update process should demonstrate that the urban growth areas have adequate existing fire protection facilities and service capacities to meet the urban level of service and any additional needed fire facilities and services. If the level of service standard adopted by the County cannot be provided over the -year planning period, then re-designation of UGAs to rural designations should be considered. Reason for change: Fire protection level of service standards were adopted in (Ordinance -0). Issues, Goals, and Policies Adopted levels of service are incorporated within the following goals, policies, and action plans. Goal A: Within the county's financial capacity, adopt a carefully planned program of county services and facilities. Policy A-: Establish Plan appropriate level of service standards for county facilities commensurate with the ability of the county to fund them. Reason for change: The proposed amendments include replacing numerical level of service (LOS) standards for certain facilities with policies supportive of those facilities. Policy A-: Extend Provide County facilities and services in a manner that supports future urban growth in urban growth areas (UGAs). Policy A-: Evaluate all types of county facilities to determine whether they should servebe provided at countywide or strictly unincorporated areas. levels of service. Transportation facility levels of service should be evaluated for appropriateness as to adopted urban or rural levels of service. Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan -

Draft March 0 0 Reason for change: Level of service standards for transportation have been moved to chapter. Policy A-: The land use element of the comprehensive plan must be reassessed to ensure that land use is coordinated and consistent with the financing plan within the capital facilities element and to ensure probable funding does not fall short of meeting existing needs. Goal B: Develop a six-year financing program for capital facilities that meets the requirements of the GMA, achieves the county's levels-of-service, and is within financial capability as determined by projected financial resources. Policy B-: Maintain and update, on at least a biennial basis, a six-year capital improvement program (CIP) that identifies projects, outlines a schedule, and designates realistic funding sources for all county capital projects based on a review of population and revenue conditions existing at that time. Goal C: Locate county facilities which require urban infrastructure, serve primarily urban populations, and are urban in character within identified urban growth areas (UGAs). Policy C-: Evaluate all new capital facilities requiring a new site for urban characteristics and limit selection of sites for urban projects to designated UGAs. Goal D: Develop and implement a coordinated program of facility expansion for the departments and agencies which together carry out the county's law enforcement and corrections functions. Policy D-: Complete those capital improvement projects necessary to eliminate any space deficiencies in law enforcement facilities and corrections facilities. Policy D-: Develop new adult corrections facilities and Sheriff s headquarter facilities on a single campus to provide a safe environment for the community, staff and inmates. Policy D-: Continue to provide juvenile detention facilities and alternative corrections programs to provide safe and secure methods to provide accountability and support for minors who break the law. Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan -

Draft March 0 0 Policy D-: Goal E: Policy E-: Policy E-: Goal F: Policy F-: Policy F-: Policy F-: Policy F-: Policy F-: Continue to provide adequate facilities for daily emergency management activities and, during an emergency or disaster, for the emergency operations center. The facilities will provide sufficient space for activities relating to emergency/disaster planning, mitigation, response and recovery. Develop and carry out a realistic long-range program of facility expansion or improvement to accommodate the county's projected staffing requirements for departments and agencies. Include in the capital facilities plan, a program of building and space improvements to efficiently provide quality work space for projected staffing levels through the -year planning period. Investigate alternatives to Ccapital Ffacility construction through the private sector, and pursue technologically feasible alternatives. Achieve level of service standardstargets for parks and trailsrecreational facilities identified in this chapter. and which ssupport objectives and priorities identified in the Comprehensive Parks, and Recreation and Open Space Plan, in the Natural Heritage Plan, and in this plan. Seek non-capital opportunities to acquire, enhance and maintain park lands, trails, and other recreational facilities. Consider partnering with cities, school districts, park & recreation districts and others when planning and implementing park and trail projects. Include acquisition and development costs in the six-year CIP for future park and trails projects. Develop a recreational facilities program that achieves and maintains the level of service for athletic fields and courts, trails, and support facilities for shoreline access, picnicking, and camping without adding to capital costs. Place a high priority on improvements to existing county recreational sites and facilities and using them to their full potential, including those outlined in the Whatcom County Comprehensive Parks, and Recreation and Open Space Plan, before investing capital in the acquisition and development of new facilities. Continue to provide and support vibrant activity centers, including senior centers, to serve the growing population of Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan -

Draft March 0 0 Whatcom County by the following methods, as needed, which are listed in priority order: () implementing programming changes, () adding space to existing centers, and/or () establishing new centers. Continue to provide centers for use by senior citizens and others. Goal G: Establish Maintain the adopted levels of service standards for roads, parks and trails., corrections, and administrative services. Policy G-: For purposes of transportation management systems, adopt level of service standards (LOS) for transportation facilities as listed in Chapter, Transportation, Policy A-. Policy G-: Adopt tthe following level of service standards are adopted for parks and trails facilities: developed parks.... acres per,000 population trails... 0.0 of a mile per,000 population activity centers... five centers per 00,000 population Reason for change: The capacity and ability of activity centers to accommodate increased demand is based upon programming and building size. As population increases, additional demand could be accommodated with program changes, building additions or a new building. Therefore, instead of imposing a strict numerical standard for activity centers, amendments to Policy F- are proposed to support activity centers and provide a prioritized method of meeting increased demand while minimizing future capital costs. Policy G-: Adopt the following level of service for correction facilities: jails.... beds per,000 population juvenile detention... 0. beds per,000 population Reason for change: The existing jail LOS does not reflect the actual need for jail beds. The County has undertaken an extensive jail planning process including a jail planning task force, needs assessment, and environmental impact statement. The existing jail LOS is based solely on population growth. However, the need for jail beds is also influenced by a number of other factors including state & local laws and criminal justice practices. Jail planning is not based upon the strict application of a numerical standard contained in the existing LOS. Therefore, the numerical standard would be replaced with new Policy D-, which supports construction of a new jail to safely provide needed corrections facilities over the -year planning period. Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan -

Draft March 0 0 The existing juvenile detention LOS standard does not reflect the actual need for juvenile detention beds. Because of alternative correction methods, the need for juvenile detention beds has not increased proportionately with population growth. Therefore, instead of imposing a strict numerical standard for juvenile detention, new Policy D- is proposed to support adequate provisions of juvenile detention facilities and programs. Policy G-: Adopt the following levels of service standards are adopted for administrative facilities: sheriff's office (unincorporated)... 0. sq. ft. per capita sheriff emergency ops (county-wide)... 0.0 sq. ft. per capita Reason for change: In conjunction with the jail planning process, the County has undertaken a process to review Sheriff s Headquarter space including a needs assessment and environmental impact statement. The need for Sheriff s Headquarter space is not based upon the strict application of a numerical standard contained in the existing LOS. Therefore, the numerical standard would be replaced with new Policy D-, which supports construction of a Sheriff s Headquarter facility co-located with the new jail. The Sheriff s Office Division of Emergency Management has re-located to a joint coordination center, near the airport. The joint coordination center is shared with the City of Bellingham Office of Emergency Management, and operates as Whatcom Unified Emergency Management. This space is adequate for emergency operations and does not need to be re-evaluated every two years when the six-year capital improvement program is updated. Therefore, instead of imposing a strict numerical standard for emergency operations, new Policy D- is proposed to support adequate provisions of emergency management facilities. Goal H: Coordinate with non-county facility providers such as cities and special purpose districts to support the future land use pattern promoted by this plan. Policy H-: Establish interagency planning mechanisms to assure coordinated and mutually supportive capital facility plans from special districts, cities, and other major non-county facility providers which are consistent with this and other chapters of the comprehensive plan. Policy H-: In consultation and coordination with special districts, cities, and other major non-county facility providers, review and update as appropriate capital facility plans supporting UGAs in conjunction with thegma -Year Review and 0-Year UGA Review. Policy H- The -year comprehensive plan review and update UGA review process should demonstrate that the urban growth areas are served by urban levels of fire protection facilities and service. If Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan -

Draft March 0 0 the level of service standard adopted by the County cannot be provided over the -year planning period, then re-designation of UGAs to rural designations should be considered. Policy H- Urban levels of service for fire protection shall be a response time of minutes 0% of the time when the department covering the urban area has staffed the fire station. When the fire station is not staffed the response time shall be 0 minutes 0% of the time, or a WSRB Rating of. Rural levels of service for fire protection shall be a response time of minutes 0% of the time when the department covering the rural area has staffed the fire station. When the fire station is not staffed the response time shall be minutes 0% of the time, or a WSRB Rating of. Staffed station shall be a fire station that is staffed hours a day days a week days a year. Staff may be paid, volunteer, or combination of the two. Goal J: Maintain effective concurrency measures and procedures for all facilities and services necessary for development. Policy J-: Based on established levels of service for all road segments under control of the county, administer a concurrency management program that provides for consistent and predictable evaluation of the impacts of future proposed development. Goal K: Consider alternative funding sources for needed county facilities.to assure levels of service adopted in the plan. Policy K-: After all other financing options have been exhausted, consider the use of bonded indebtedness to finance major capital investments in infrastructure. Policy K-: Identify and promote public private partnerships to provide and enhance the provision of necessary services. Goal L: Ensure that capital facilities provide protection for threatened and endangered fish and wildlife species. Policy L-: Fish and wildlife habitat should be carefully considered when selecting projects for the Six-Year Capital Improvement Program. Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan -

Draft March 0 0 Policy L-: Projects selected for the Six-Year Capital Improvement Program shall not degrade habitat for threatened and endangered species. Policy L-: Projects selected for the Six-Year Capital Improvement Program should strive to restore degraded habitat for threatened and endangered species, when the projects are in direct contact with such habitat. The County Council will determine when such restoration is financially feasible through adoption of the sixyear capital improvement program and the County budget. Goal M: Enable school districts to receive impact fees to fund a proportionate share of system improvements reasonably related to new development by adopting into this plan their capital facilities plans. and establishing interlocal agreements with the districts to collect and transfer funds. Policy M-: The capital facilities plan for the Bellingham School District, adopted by the district on July, 0, is adopted into the comprehensive plan by reference. Policy M-: The capital facilities plan for the Ferndale School District, adopted by the district on December, 0, is adopted into the comprehensive plan by reference. Policy M-: The capital facilities plan for the Lynden School District, adopted by the district on June, 0, is adopted into the comprehensive plan by reference. Policy M-: The capital facilities plan for the Meridian School District, adopted by the district on June, 0, is adopted into the comprehensive plan by reference. NOTE: Capital facility plan references will be updated as new plans are formulated. Goal N: Adopt special district and County capital facility plans for unincorporated UGAs, not associated with a city, into this plan by reference when consistent with the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan. Policy N-: The Birch Bay Water and Sewer District Comprehensive Water System Plan, dated March 0, is adopted by reference into the comprehensive plan. Policy N-: The Birch Bay Water and Sewer District Comprehensive Sewer System Plan, dated May 0, is adopted by reference into the comprehensive plan. Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan - 0

Draft March 0 0 Policy N-: The Birch Bay Comprehensive Stormwater Plan, dated July 0, is adopted by reference into the comprehensive plan. Policy N-: The North Whatcom Fire and Rescue Capital Facilities Plan, dated August 0, is adopted by reference into the comprehensive plan. Policy N-: The Public Utility District No. Comprehensive Water System Plan, dated October 0, is adopted by reference into the comprehensive Plan. Policy N-: The Columbia Valley Water District Water System Plan Update is adopted by reference into the comprehensive plan. This water system serves a portion of the Columbia Valley UGA. Policy N-: The Water District No. Small Water System Plan, dated August, is adopted by reference into the comprehensive plan. This water system serves a portion of the Columbia Valley UGA. Policy N-: The Water District No. Comprehensive Sewer Plan, dated August, is adopted by reference into the comprehensive plan. This sewer system serves a portion of the Columbia Valley UGA. Policy N-: The public stormwater facilities sections relating to the Columbia Valley UGA in the Water Quantity and Quality Report Foothills Subarea (Aspect Consulting, July, 0, pp. -, -, and -) are adopted by reference into the comprehensive Plan. Policy N-0: The Whatcom Fire District No. Capital Facilities Plan, dated July, is adopted by reference into the comprehensive Plan. Policy N-: The Mount Baker School District Capital Facilities Plan, dated May, is adopted by reference into the comprehensive plan. Policy N-: The Whatcom County Fire District No. Capital Facilities Plan, dated May, is adopted by reference into the Comprehensive Plan (except that the UGA boundaries shown in the Fire District No. Capital Facilities Plan are not adopted by reference). NOTE: Capital facility plan references will be updated as new plans are formulated. Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan -

Draft March 0 0 Capital Facilities Action Plan. Adopt a county six-year CIP to meet the GMA specifications including concurrency and all other capital needs for the six-year financing program component of the capital facilities element. Reason for change: The six-year CIP is already addressed in Policy B-.. Identify appropriate levels of long-term bonded debt to finance major capital investments in infrastructure. Reason for change: Identifying the level of long term debt is an exercise that the County s elected officials, in conjunction with the Finance Department, may undertake at any time at their discretion.. Explore alternative funding sources as authorized under the GMA to help fund the cost of infrastructure expansions required to serve new development. Reason for change: Alternative funding is generally addressed in Goal K.. Maintain a concurrency management or monitoring process for transportation and adequacy reviews of new development as an integral part of land use and building permit review. Reason for change: Transportation is addressed in Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan and transportation concurrency is addressed in Chapter. of the Whatcom County Zoning Code.. Explore alternative funding techniques for law and justice facilities and operations, including contracts for service with other agencies, private providers, and joint use of facilities. Reason for change: Alternative funding is generally addressed in Goal K.. Analyze probable future staffing and space requirements in conjunction with the budget process and updating of the capital facilities plan. Reason for change: This is addressed in Goal E and Policy E-.. Pursue acquisition strategies for resource conservancy and linear parks (trails) on an other than fee simple basis to reduce cost without significant reduction in public use/benefit potential. Reason for change: The intent of this action item is somewhat similar to Policy F-. Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan -

Draft March 0. Pursue joint ventures with cities, school districts, and other potential partners in developing regional athletic parks as recommended in the Comprehensive Park and Recreation Open Space Plan. Reason for change: This approach generally has been incorporated into Policy F-.. Work with special districts, cities, and other major non-county facility providers including water and sewer districts, fire districts, public utility districts and others as appropriate to establish levels of service for urban growth areas. This must be done in order to assure facilities adequate to provide for anticipated population growth and development consistent with land use plan designations and zoning. Reason for change: Goal H, Policy H- and Policy H- address coordination of special purpose district plans with the County land use plans. 0. Explore alternative technology to create cost savings for capital facility needs. Reason for change: Technological alternatives are addressed by Policy E-.. Establish public/private partnership alternatives to capital financing. Reason for change: Public/private partnerships are addressed by Policy K-.. Capital facility plans for water, sewer, stormwater, fire and schools that serve unincorporated UGAs will be incorporated by reference when consistent with the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan. Reason for change: This is addressed in Goal N. Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan -