Attachment C. Updated March 23 rd, 2018 by EveryOne Home

Similar documents
The Community Partnership How to Run the CoC-APR 2018 Report Version 1 Last Updated December 17, 2018

HMIS 320 APR Training

Using Data to Make Funding and Reallocation Decisions

2018 Kentucky Balance of State CoC Expansion Project Scoresheet for RRH and PSH Projects (Approved by KY BoS CoC Advisory Board August 3, 2018)

[HUDX-225] HMIS Data Quality Report Reference Tool

HUD 2016 System Performance Measures Submission Recap. NYC Coalition on the Continuum of Care October 20, 2017

APR Data: # of Clients: # of Households # of Adults # of Leavers: # of Adult Leavers:

HUD-ESG CAPER User Guide

COC RANKING For Grant Year 2017

HUD CoC Reviewing, Scoring and Ranking Procedure

Santa Clara County Performance Measures - Updated July 1, June 30, 2019

NY-606/Rockland County CoC Rank & Review - Attachments Checklist

FY Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

FY16 HUD CoC Program Consolidated Application Scoring Criteria Summary June 2016

FY Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

AGENDA. 1. Welcome and Introductions. 2. Review IRP Meeting Summary from Feb. 7, HUD CoC Program NOFA

Santa Clara County Performance Measures - finalized July 1, June 30, 2017

2018 Performance Management Plan. Ohio Balance of State Continuum of Care Updated January 2018

Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

HMIS PROGRAMMING SPECIFICATIONS

FY2019 HCCSC SCORING CRITERIA AND SCORE SHEET

CoC Annual Performance Report (APR) Guide

GLOSSARY HMIS STANDARD REPORTING TERMINOLOGY. A reference guide for methods of selecting clients and data used commonly in HMIS-generated reports

Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Continuum of Care 2017 Renewal Project Performance Scorecard

Summary of 3 County CoC SPM Report Data

SACRAMENTO HOMELESS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM: DATA QUALITY PLAN

2019 Housing Inventory Count (HIC) Guidance Document

2017 Saratoga-North Country CoC Project Rank & Review Application

FY 2017 TX BoS CoC Review, Score, and Ranking Procedures and Reallocation Process for HUD Continuum of Care Program Funds

Metropolitan Denver Homeless Initiative 2016 CoC NOFA Evaluation Tool for Renewal Project Applications

Continuum of Care Written Standards for NY- 508 Buffalo, Niagara Falls/Erie, Niagara, Orleans, Genesee, Wyoming Counties CoC

HMIS INTAKE - HOPWA. FIRST NAME MIDDLE NAME LAST NAME (and Suffix) Client Refused. Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander LIVING SITUATION

GLOSSARY HMIS STANDARD REPORTING TERMINOLOGY. A reference guide for methods of selecting clients and data used commonly in HMIS-generated reports

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the BYC and SPP

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Idaho Balance of State 10/1/2009-9/30/2010

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Tarrant County/Ft. Worth 10/1/2012-9/30/2013

The 2017 HUD CoC Annual Performance Report (CoC-APR) Training for the Ohio Balance of State and Mahoning CoCs

TOOL OVERVIEW. FY2019 CoC Program Competition Renewal Project Scoring Tool

2009 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR)

PSH Renewal Review & Scoring Document

HMIS Programming Specifications PATH Annual Report. January 2018

New Hampshire Continua of Care SGIA Homelessness Prevention (HP) Project Record Creation Intake Entry Services Exit Packet

CLARITY HMIS: HUD-CoC PROJECT INTAKE FORM

2017 HUD CoC Program Rating and Review Procedure

HHS PATH Intake Assessment

Full DOB reported Approximate or Partial DOB reported

SHELTER DIVERSION ServicePoint Handbook

Full DOB reported Approximate or Partial DOB reported. Non Hispanic/Non Latino Hispanic/Latino

NOTES. Step 2: choose the correct city if 2 or more cities share the same ZIP Code.

DESTINATION Which of the following most closely matches where the client will be staying right after leaving this project?

The Community Partnership HMIS Data Collection Guide Version 3 - Last Updated October 10, 2018

Santa Barbara County HMIS Data Quality Plan

FY2017 CoC Program Competition Application Score Cards

City of Tucson Housing and Community Development Department Planning and Development Division

Before Starting the Exhibit 1 Continuum of Care (CoC) Application

QUALITY OF SOCIAL SECURITY Client doesn t know Full SSN reported Client refused Approximate or partial SSN reported Data not collected

HMIS REQUIRED UNIVERSAL DATA ELEMENTS

Wilder Foundation Family Supportive Housing Services: ROOF Project

ESG CAPER Helper Guide

Name Data Quality (DQ) D.O.B. Type (DQ) Gender (from list)

FY 2013 NOFA Planning and Advocacy December 17, 2013

Office of Community Planning and Development

Homeless Management Information System (HMIS)

2018 HMIS INTAKE VA: SSVF Homelessness Prevention Head of Household or Adult (18+)

1A. Continuum of Care (CoC) Identification

Continuum of Care (CoC) and Emergency Solutions Grant Program (ESG) 2015 Policy Manual

HMIS Data Standards: HMIS Data. Dictionary. Released May, 2014 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Volume 2

HMIS Data Standards DATA DICTIONARY

QUALITY OF SOCIAL SECURITY Client doesn t know Full SSN reported Client refused Approximate or partial SSN reported Data not collected

ServicePoint Handbook

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY HOMELESS ACTION PARTNERSHIP

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Louisville/Jefferson County 10/1/2009-9/30/2010

New Hampshire Continua of Care APR Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS (HOPWA) Exit Form for HMIS

Completeness review detail v 0.2.1

Universal Intake Form

New Hampshire Continua of Care HUD CoC APR TH PH ES Updates Form for HMIS (Required by HUD for each client when data is updated)

Exit Form: Print on Light-Blue Paper

King County Base Year Calculator Results Emergency Shelter for Family Projects Performance Summary March 11, 2016

PATH 2015 Data for EXPORT v 1.0

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Washington County, OR 10/1/2012-9/30/2013

Toledo Lucas County Continuum of Care: 2016 Key Performance Indicators

October 24, 2017 CIS Training P R E SENT ED B Y G A I T HER STEPHENS

The Role of HUD s Homeless and Mainstream Housing Programs in Ending Homelessness. Jennifer Ho Ann Marie Oliva Marcy Thompson

HMIS Data Standards DATA DICTIONARY

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Nebraska Balance of State 10/1/2016-9/30/2017

HUD Annual Performance Report (APR) Programming Specifications

Exhibit 1.1 Estimated Homeless Counts during a One-Year Period 1 Reporting Year: 10/1/2016-9/30/2017 Site: Washington County, OR

2014 HMIS Data Dictionary and HMIS Data Manual Summary

Data Quality Plan Tampa / Hillsborough County Continuum of Care

Summary and Analysis of the Interim ESG Rule December 2011

2017 Emergency Solutions Grant Training Workshop

Exhibit 1.1 Estimated Homeless Counts during a One-Year Period 1 Reporting Year: 10/1/2016-9/30/2017 Site: Washington County, OR

Toledo Lucas County Continuum of Care: 2014 Key Performance Indicators

2017 Point in Time Count

Universal Intake Form

Ending Homelessness in Alameda County Strategic Plan Update

Sheltered Homeless Persons

Standards for CoC- and ESG-Funded Rapid Re-Housing Programs in the Metropolitan Denver Continuum of Care

HMIS Data Collection Form for Project EXIT/Annual Review All Projects (Excluding RHY)

APR Requirements and Data Entry Workflow Review

Transcription:

Attachment C Instructions for Manual Calculations of Performance Outcome Measures A-D, Capacity and Utilization Measure, HMIS Data Quality Measure, and HUD Target Population Report Updated March 23 rd, 2018 by EveryOne Home The purpose of Attachment C is to allow Projects: 1) the option of performing manual calculations of the following objective criteria: Performance Outcome Measures A-D, Capacity and Utilization Measure, HMIS Data Quality Measure, and HUD Target Population Report and; 2) the ability to trace each outcome measure to the source data (APR, HMIS-general program entry data, and HIC report). This Attachment is for Reference Only. There is no need to perform calculations by hand for the 2018 Project Evaluation assessment, these outcomes will be automatically using the EveryOne Home HUD NOFA Target Population Report Tool and the EveryOne Home APR Tool. To fulfill the submission requirement for these tools, please carefully review Attachment A Instructions for 2018 HUD NOFA Target Population Report and Attachment B Instructions to Download Project s APR and Run the EOH APR Tool. If you have any questions, please direct them to info@everyonehome.org. The FAQ period begins Monday, April 2, 2018 and ends Friday, April 6, 2018. Projects renewing for the first time that are not yet under contract, or which were not in operation for a full twelve months since October 1, 2016: Renewing projects without a year of operation and expenditures need only to submit an updated Project Cover Sheet. They will receive the score awarded when they applied as a new project and be ranked according to that score. Projects with a start date later than October 1, 2016 and a full year of program data may elect to receive the score awarded when they applied as a new project or submit a full Project Evaluation Package based on data from their start date to twelve months later. New TH-RRH Projects can have the option to: 1) keep the score obtained when applying as a new TH-RRH project in 2017, or 2) or submit a full Project Evaluation package to be evaluated according to data from 2017 as a general TH Project. Projects that choose to keep their prior score need only to submit an updated Project Cover Sheet. They may also be asked to complete a Project Milestone Update as part of a Monitoring TA/Site Visit. 1 P age

OUTCOMES PERFORMANCE APR Performance Outcomes (up to 32 Points) The following section is related to project performance on local and HUD required outcomes. New to the 2018 NOFA, the EOH APR Tool will perform automatic calculations of certain APR Outcome measures. Please read Attachment B carefully for a detailed guide on how to run the APR Report and the EOH APR Tool. Renewal projects should complete the APR Tool depending on project type. Following are detailed illustrations of calculations made by the EveryOne Home HUD CoC APR Tool ( EOH APR Tool ) using sample tables and formulas. i. Outcome A: Housing (Up to 10 points) PSH: Permanent Supportive Housing Projects must produce the Housing Retention information from 10/1/2016-9/30/2017 APR, Question 22a1. The EOH APR Tool calculates the appropriate measure using the formula below, as demonstrated on the sample tables identifying each cell value. Housing Retention > 12 months % of persons retaining permanent housing for 12 months or more. = (A + B + C + D + E) / [F (G + H + I + J + K)] APR Table: 2 P age

EOH APR Tool Table: RRH, general TH, and youth-serving Transitional Housing and TH and PH-RRH: Rapid Rehousing, general Transitional Housing, youth-serving Transitional Housing, must produce the Obtaining Permanent Housing information from the APR, Questions 23a, 23b, and 5a. The EOH APR Tool calculates percentage of adults obtaining permanent housing using the formula below, as demonstrated on the sample tables identifying each cell value. Obtaining Permanent Housing % of persons obtaining permanent housing = (A + B) / C APR Tables: 3 P age

4 P age

EOH APR Tool Table: ii. Outcome B: Income (Up to 7 points) PSH, RRH, Joint TH and PH-RRH, general TH, and transition aged youth-serving Transitional Housing: For PSH and general Transitional Housing the Income Outcome measure is Adult Stayers and Leavers. For Rapid Rehousing, Joint TH and PH-RRH, and transition aged youth-serving TH, the Income Outcome measure is Adult Stayers and Leavers Who Increase Income. Using APR, Questions 19a3, the EOH APR Tool calculates the percentage of adults who obtained or maintained earned income using the formula below, as demonstrated on the sample tables identifying each cell value. Retain or Increase Income (PSH and General TH) % of persons who retained or increased their income = (A + B) / C Increase Income (RRH and TAY TH) % of person who increased their income = B / C 5 P age

APR Table EOH APR Tool Table: 6 P age

iii. Outcome C: Benefits (Up to 7 points) ALL PROJECT TYPES: produce the Access to Mainstream Benefits information from the APR, Question 20b and 21, and APR Question 18 and 5a. The EOH APR Tool calculates the use of mainstream benefits as follows. Adults Who Obtain or Maintain Non-Cash Mainstream Benefits % of adults with non-cash mainstream benefits = (A + B + C + D + E + F) / (G + H I J) 7 P age

EOH APR Tool Table: 8 P age

iv. Outcome D: Varied (Up to 8 Points) PSH: Exits to Homelessness RRH / TAY serving TH: Returns to Homelessness General-use TH: Length of Stay Proposed Joint TH and PH-RRH complete data for either General TH or RRH Use the charts and formulas below for an illustration of EOH APR tool calculations according to your project type. Permanent Supportive Housing % of persons who exit to homelessness: (A + B + C + D + E + F + G + H) / I 9 P age

I refers to the table below, also listed in page 4 of the 2018 Renewal Project Scoring Tool. The benchmarks vary depending on the total bed capacity of the program. EOH APR Tool Table: Rapid Rehousing and TAY-serving Transitional Housing if using this measure: % Return to Homelessness within Two Years: A/B Due to HMIS agency visibility issues, EveryOne Home staff will run the System Performance Report 701 (Returns to Homelessness). Agencies cannot view data for clients who returned to homelessness outside of their agency. Therefore, this methodology is necessary for an accurate measure. The measure will be calculated as follows, assuming that a System Performance Measure Report 701 has been run at the System Admin visibility level by EveryOne Home: 10 P age

General-Purpose Transitional Housing if using this measure: A below shows the median number of bed nights in your project for this fiscal year. EOH APR Tool Table: 11 P age

I. Capacity and Utilization Following are illustrations of calculations made by the EOH APR Tool using sample tables and formulas. Site-based Projects (PSH and TH): Number of Units in project (F) = Average # of Households served = to find this value add the four PIT Counts of households divided by 4 (Q 8.b) fields B+C+D+E/4 = 8b - Point-In-Time Count of Persons on the Last Wednesday "January" "April" "July" "October" "Total" B C D E "Without Children" "With Children and Adults" "With Only Children" "Unknown Household Type" Utilization Rate: (Average # of Households Served / Number of Units) in Project Scattered Site (PSH and RRH) Number of contracted subsidies/slots in project (F) = Households served = APR question 8.a (field A below) 8a - Number of Households Served "Total Households" "Total" A "Without Children" "With Children and Adults" "With Only Children" "Unknown Household Type" Utilization Rate = # of Households served / Number of contracted subsidies in project= 12 P age

EOH APR Tool Table: 13 P age

II. HMIS Data Quality The following are illustrations of calculations made by the EOH APR Tool using sample formula and tables of APR questions 6a through 6e to calculate HMIS Data Quality. (A + B + C + D + E) / 7 = % that will serve as the project grade 6a Data Quality: Personal Identifying Information Data Element Client Doesn t Know Information Missing Data Issues % of Error Rate Name SSN DOB Race Ethnicity Gender Overall Score A 6b Data Quality: Universal Data Elements Data Element Error Count % of Error Rate Veteran Status Project Entry Date Relationship to Head of Household Client Location Disabling Condition B C D E F 6c Data Quality Income and Housing Data Quality Data Element Error Count % of Error Rate Destination Income and Sources at Entry G Income and Sources at Annual Assessment Income and Sources at Exit 14 P age

EOH APR Tool Table: 15 P age

III. EveryOne Home Target Population Report The EveryOne Home Target Population Report tabulates data using the 2018 NOFA Program Entry Report (as downloaded from ReportWriter in ServicePoint) and the Demographics with Detail Report (downloaded from ART) as follows, with example tables: 1. Heads of households with a program entry date between 10/1/2016 9/30/17 and who entered from a place not meant for habitation. The count is based on the 2018 NOFA Program Entry Report after the following filters are applied: 2. Heads of households with a program entry date between 10/1/2016 9/30/17 and who are fleeing from domestic violence or human trafficking. The count is based on the 2018 NOFA Program Entry Report after the following filters are applied: 16 P age

3. Heads of households with a program entry date between 10/1/2016 9/30/17 and who are veterans of the U.S. military. The count is based on the 2018 NOFA Program Entry Report after the following filters are applied: 4. Heads of households with a program entry date between 10/1/2016 9/30/17 and who were between the ages of 18 and 24 at the time of program entry. The count is based on the 2018 NOFA Program Entry Report after the following filters are applied: 5. Households with a program entry date between 10/1/2016 9/30/17 with one or more chronically homeless persons. The count is based on the Demographics with Details after the following filters are applied: Note: The column Is New This Report indicates that the client entered the program ( is new ) during the reporting period (10/1/16 9/30/17), which is why it is filtered for Yes. 17 P age