The National Payment Reform Summit Preparing for New Payment Models A Community Perspective

Similar documents
Alternative Payment Models and Clearinghouses Education and Impacts. White Paper by the Emerging Trends and Strategic Innovation Committee

Value Based Contracting

Presentation to the IOM Committee on Core Metrics Tom Williams, Dr PH, President & CEO, IHA January 7, 2014, Irvine, California

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ENROLLMENT GROWS YET MARGINS DROP FOR OHIO S HEALTH INSURING CORPORATIONS. 970,000 Ohioans remained uninsured in 2014.

Gulf Coast and LA HFMA Payer Summit Value-based contracts same healthcare business?

CPC+ PAYMENT METHODOLOGIES: BENEFICIARY ATTRIBUTION, CARE MANAGEMENT FEE, PERFORMANCE-BASED INCENTIVE PAYMENT, AND PAYMENT UNDER THE MEDICARE

Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Initiative

The Landscape of Medicaid Value-based Purchasing

AAOS MACRA Proposed Rule Summary (Short)

Washington All-Payer Health Care Claims Database (WA-APCD) Data Supplier Meeting

Plan Management Navigator

Ohio s Health Insurance Market

Medicaid FQHC APMs What are they and what do they mean for health centers? Alex Harris, MSPH Deputy Director, Transformation Policy

Enhanced PCMH Payment Models and Mechanisms

The MetroHealth System

A Practical Discussion of Value and Quality Based Payments What Do I Do Now?

The Emergence of Value-Based Care: Present and Future Tense

Session 115IF, Provider Risk-Sharing Arrangements in Medicaid. Presenters: Puneet Budhiraja, ASA, MAAA Michael Minor Sudha Shenoy, FSA, MAAA, CERA

Figure 1: Original APM Framework

Clinically Integrated Networks and Population Health The next chapter in healthcare

MEDICARE-MEDICAID CAPITATED FINANCIAL ALIGNMENT MODEL QUALITY WITHHOLD TECHNICAL NOTES (DY 2 5)

The Health Management Academy Strategic Survey Q1 2019: Defining Risk. March 2019

Medical Membership (covered lives) by Payer, Point in Time (PIT)

Thank you, and enjoy the webinar.

SIM Update. State Innovation Model

Fifth Annual National ACO Summit

MEDICARE ADVANTAGE INSIGHTS

National APM Data Collection Frequently Asked Questions for 2018

Cutting Edge Issues Related to. April 16, Payments to Physicians Under P4P Compensation Models

No change from proposed rule. healthcare providers and suppliers of services (e.g.,

QPP Other Payer Advanced APMs: CMMI Multi-Payer Model Payer Perspective

Ohio s Health Insurance Market

The New York State Value-Based Payment (VBP) Roadmap. Behavioral Health Providers January 30, 2018

Health care affordability VBC transformation

CMS Quality Payment Program

MACRA, MIPS, APMs & CPC+: What to Expect from All These Acronyms?! Monthly National Briefing April 26, 2016

Value Based Purchasing

Evaluating the Fair Market Value of Pay for Performance

RE: Additional Input regarding Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) and the Medicare Shared Saving Program

Allscripts Healthcare Solutions

Scripps Health ACO Update

31 Flavors of Risk: Effectively Making the Transition to Value- Based Care. November 2013

How are the State, Managed Medicaid Organizations and Providers Preparing for Medicaid Value-Based Payments?

Clinic Comparison Reporting. June 30, 2016

2.05 Predictive Modeling P4P and Physician Engagement. Pay for Performance Summit February 7, 2006

10/17/2014 Risk-Based Payment Methodologies A National Perspective Art Jones, MD. AccountableCareInstitute.com

Trekking Towards Value Based Payments

evaluating the fair market value of pay for performance

Implementing the DSRIP Finance Function

Financial Analysis of Anthem/WellPoint

REPORT 8 OF THE COUNCIL ON MEDICAL SERVICE (I-11) Administrative Simplification in the Physician Practice (Reference Committee J) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PLAN MANAGEMENT ADVISORY GROUP September 8, 2016

9/23/2016. Our Services. Transitioning from Fee-for-Service to Value-based Reimbursement. Key Trends and Strategies for Rural Health Providers

CureMD & Physician Quality Reporting Programs. Presented by Sara Irshad Consultant,

In accordance with Act 124 of 2018 (H.914)

Financial Alignment Demonstrations for Dual Eligible Beneficiaries Compared:

Aligning PQRS and Meaningful Use. Maximize your Medicare Reimbursement

A PRIMER FOR PRIMARY CARE

Strategic Plan Scorecard Measuring Success

Medical Membership (covered lives) by Payer, Point in Time (PIT) Effective 6/8/2017

UC Health Accepted Insurance Plans

DSRIP Funds Flow Distribution Process Review of Model Framework

Clinical Episode Contracting for Commercial Payers January 2019

Introducing Value-Based Care Analytics

Utah Partnership for Value: Update on Total Cost of Care Reports in Utah

The UNC Health Care System & BlueCross BlueShield of North Carolina Model Medical Practice: A Blueprint for Successful Collaboration

Provider Reimbursement Strategies & Opportunities Board of Trustees Meeting

Medicare Advantage: 2015 National Snapshot

Consulting Actuaries CARRIER TREND REPORT JANUARY 2016 ANALYSIS

STARs Program and SETMA s Solution By James L. Holly, MD Your Life Your Health The Examiner April 26, 2012

Value-Based Purchasing for Managed Long- Term Services and Supports (MLTSS)

The Road to Value. Aric R. Sharp, MHA, CMPE, FACHE Vice President Accountable Care UnityPoint Health February 3, 2017

Understanding Benchmarking for Healthcare Organizations

Gobeille v. Liberty Mutual and the Colorado APCD NHPF Forum Session: Show Me the Data

Payment Reform 3.0: It s Time

FUNDS FLOW METHODOLOGY FOR RISK-BASED CONTRACTS

2017 CAQH INDEX. A Report of Healthcare Industry Adoption of Electronic Business Transactions and Cost Savings

MACRA Final Rule Summary

Issue Brief. Key Design Elements of Shared- Savings Payment Arrangements. Michael Bailit and Christine Hughes OVERVIEW

Adopting Multi-Payer and All- Payer Payment Models in States OCTOBER 25, 2016 WASHINGTON MARRIOTT WARDMAN PARK HOTEL WASHINGTON, DC

CY 2018 Quality Payment Program Final Rule Summary

CMS PROPOSES KEY PROVISIONS OF MACRA PHYSICIAN PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR 2019

SUBMISSION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS:

Flagler Hospital Physician Clinical Integration Committee. Recommendations Regarding Formation of a Clinically Integrated Network

Stakeholder Innovation Group (SIG):

Medicare s Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations Proposed Rule

E-Commerce Enrollment

Quality Payment Program Year 3

NCVHS. May 15, Dear Madam Secretary,

Eight Indispensable Financial Considerations of Shifting from Volume to Value Reimbursement

Top Health Plans Expanding


Financial Analysis of WellCare

Consulting Actuaries. Carrier Trend Report

Copyright Scottsdale Institute All Rights Reserved.

Health Care Payment Reform: State-based Payment Reform Models Who is Doing What? Is it Working? Part Two of a Three-Part Series

PAYMENT REFORM: SHIFTING TOWARDS ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT METHODOLOGY. John-Andrew Young Community Development/Data Analyst

The Health Insurance Market in Virginia. Maureen Dempsey, MD, MSc, ACC, FAAP Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield June 8, 2017

Session 99AB Provider-Sponsored Health Plans Are Increasing in Number: What Leaders Need to Know

RISE RAPS-EDS Collaboration Research Project Executive Summary

Transcription:

The National Payment Reform Summit Preparing for New Payment Models A Community Perspective Barbara Tobias, MD Medical Director Health Collaborative February 20, 2013

Title The Health Collaborative Points Neutral forum for all stakeholders Those providing health care Those receiving health care Those paying for health care

Greater Cincinnati Healthcare Landscape 6 Major Health Systems 50+ Community Health Centers Crossroad Health Centers Winton Hills Medical & Health Centers Lincoln Heights Health Care Connection HealthPoint Family Care City of Cincinnati Primary Care & Dental Centers Primary Health Solutions Neighborhood Health Care Centers HealthSource of Ohio

Cincinnati Regional Health Transformation Aligning Forces for Quality 3.0-4.0 REC Beacon Collaborative Aligning Forces for Quality 3.0-4.0 Communities Putting Prevention to Work Bethesda Inc Comprehensiv e Primary Care Initiative

Cincinnati Medical Home Initiative Sept 09-Sept 11 Health Plans Commitment to Pilots: Humana, Anthem, and UnitedHealthcare committed to provide Per Member/Per Month Care Management fee for 2 years for up to 10,000 covered lives each (totaling 30,000) Fees negotiated on a practice by practice basis (ranging between $2-$6 PMPM) Actual covered lives ended up totaling ~18,000 due to market share and lack of participation by some ASOs 11 Practices selected to participate Based upon Payer mix and readiness as assessed via application NCQA PCMH 2008 Recognition

Co-Pilots (2009-2011) Title 8 additional practices agreed to participate without the PMPM care management fee Points Projects ran simultaneously, with similar support NCQA PCMH 2008 Recognition

Multipayer Claims Data Base United, Anthem, Humana Aetna, HealthSpan

Title Points The Trust Walk

9 Community Claims Data Base: in progress The Health Collaborative received two years, historical claims data, 2009-2010, from Anthem, United,Humana, HealthSpan and Aetna. The Health Collaborative anticipated* receiving quarterly updates of data from an add l 2 years, provided adherence to data use agreements and plan representation on the Health Collaborative Board of Directors. ]

Analytic Process 10 Health Care Incentives Improvement Institute (HCI3) Analytic Vendor, non-profit, Robert Wood Johnson supportive Run each plan s data through the Prometheus analytics. Calculate the mutually agreed upon utilization metrics at the individual plan level and the aggregate to the community level. Report community wide results compared to national benchmarks* *Benchmarks are derived from nationwide Prometheus data runs covering 2009-2010, commercially insured populations, over 3 million lives

Claims Data Base Status Update Study Period Payer 1 Payer 2 Payer 3 Payer 4 Payer 5 1 + 2 + + + + + 3 + + + + 4 + + + + 5 + + + 6 + + + 7 + + 8

Practice Reports PracticeLevelUtilizationReportAcrossChronicEpisodesofCare ChronicEpisodesofCareincludeCOPD,Asthma,Hypertension,Diabetes,CHF,CAD,andGERD DataarereportedattheChronicEpisodeSummarylevelduetosmallsamplesizeatthepracticelevelwithineachepisodecategory DateRange:1/1/2009 12/31/2010;DataSources:commerciallyinsuredpopulation Averageof 17PCMH practice sites NonPCMH practice sites Practice1 Practice2 Practice3 Practice4 Practice5 Practice6 EpisodeN 843 281 163 213 154 166 5324 45502 AverageAge 52 57 64 50 53 56 56 48 50thPercentileRiskFactorCount 6 6 8 6 8 6 7 6 Admitsper1,000 33 14 67 28 65 24 35 32 AverageLengthofStay(days) 2.61 6.75 2.82 2.83 3.20 4.25 3.27 3.89 TotalBedDaysper1,000Admits 87 96 190 80 208 102 117 124 EDvisitsper1,000 196 125 117 136 214 120 174 185 PotentiallyAvoidableComplications(PACs)per1,000 981 747 1417 826 812 892 1069 1136 PercentofPatientswithatleast1PAC 50% 52% 54% 54% 51% 57% 54% 54%

Community Claims Data Base Challenges Inconsistent data submission No Medicare and Medicaid data No cost data Data use agreements Organizational realignment Progress Initial reports to stakeholders Utilization/Potentially Avoidable Complications Proxy for Costs Additional payers data Established foundation for recognition of Medicare Qualified Entity Foundation for CPC New agreements: cost, PHI

Pilot and Co-Pilot Aftermath United Anthem Humana

CPCi Markets

Cincinnati/Dayton/Northern Kentucky Market 75 Practices: 66 System affiliated 9 Independent Quality & Data Transparency: 71% Public Reporting Initiative 49% NCQA PCMH recognition 25% 2008 standards 24% 2011 standards 90% attested for MU Stage 1 EHRs: Epic-59% AllScripts-23% Athena-13% McKesson-3% NextGen-1% Amazing Charts-1%

Cincinnati/Dayton/Northern KY Market 75 practices 9 were part of the original pilot/co-pilot cohort 261 Providers 10 Payers Aetna CareSource (Ohio only) Centene Corporation (Ohio only) Amerigroup (Ohio only) Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield of Ohio Humana HealthSpan Medical Mutual Ohio Medicaid within the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services UnitedHealthcare Estimated 44,500 Medicare beneficiaries Estimated 250,000 Commercial, Medicaid, and Medicare Advantage

Shared Savings Quality Metrics: 17 NQF endorsed measures (pending) 2 patient experience (CG-CAHPS) 3 care coordination (Claims) 6 preventive health (EHR) 6 at-risk population (EHR) Begin tracking one utilization and one quality metric in 2013 Begin reporting all 17 measures to CMS in 2014 (CY 2013 as baseline)

Payment Model

Hierarchy of Support

Multipayer Claims Database: Challenges/Opportunities Safeguarding community trust as single, trusted neutral fiduciary to collect and aggregate data and reports 11 (Including CMS) pending contracts will require close individual attention (time and resources) to achieve alignment that will demonstrate greatest value to the community, consumers, employers, payers and providers Numerous competitive local and national vendors aggressively soliciting for opportunity to support this analytic work Identifying and securing sustainable funding for this work

Title We can t call it a Points prize because we don t know what s going to happen to the winner MTV