Cohesion Policy Czech Perspective

Similar documents
Training on EU policies for Directors of the Region of Sicily. Brussels Office of the Region of Sicily Rue Belliard 12

Czech Perspective on Future of Cohesion Policy after 2020

Investing in regions: The reformed EU Cohesion Policy

The impact of the ESIFs for Lithuanian economy in and the evaluation of development priorities for the programming period

EU Budget for the future New legislative package for cohesion policy #CohesionPolicy #EUinmyRegion

Programming Period. European Social Fund

Council conclusions on the Fifth Report on economic, social and territorial cohesion

COHESION POLICY

Prospects for the review of the EU 2020 Strategy, the Juncker Plan and Cohesion Policy after 2020

Summary of the Partnership Agreement for Croatia,

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

LITHUANIAN EXPERIENCE IN IMPLEMENTING EUSBSR

4th MEETING of the High Level Expert Group on Monitoring Simplification for Beneficiaries of ESI Funds Gold-plating

INTERIM REPORT ON THE ABSORPTION OF THE EUROPEAN FUNDS IN THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA FOR 2011

The approved ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. ESPON ECP Meeting 9-10 December 2015 in Luxembourg

Smart Specialisation as linking element between Horizon 2020 and the reformed European Cohesion Policy

BUSINESS PRIORITIES FOR EU COHESION POLICY

Summary of the Partnership Agreement for Hungary,

Presidency Team. Ministry of Education and Science. Yanita ZHERKOVA Head of Department, Science Directorate

Horizon 2020 & Cohesion Policy: Synergies in the context of Smart Specialisation

Cohesion Policy support for Energy Renovation of Buildings

The Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) Regulation and its impact on Cyprus Republic

ON THE MID-TERM REVIEW OF EUROPE Athens declaration. A Territorial Vision for Growth and Jobs EUROPEAN UNION. Committee of the Regions

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2015/2282(INI)

1. On 11 September 2017, the Presidency submitted to Member States draft Council conclusions on cohesion policy post-2020.

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Cross-cutting audit issues

Draft template and guidelines on the content of the Partnership Agreements (PAs) (Article 14 of the CPR) CLLD aspects

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION COHESION POLICY FOR PROGRAMMING PERIOD: EVOLUTIONS, DIFFICULTIES, POSITIVE FACTORS

EU Cohesion Policy response to the economic crisis: Investing in the real economy. Rudolf Niessler, Director, European Commission, DG Regional Policy

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/2304(INI)

The European Statistical System s reaction to the statistical consequences of the financial crisis

Joint position of the national, regional and local governments of the Netherlands on reform of the ESI funds Coherence and simplification post 2020

Experiences with the implementation of Evaluation plans in structural funds programmes in the Czech Republic

Amended proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Financial Instruments supported by the European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds in CSI-Europe towards FIs for Cities

INCEPTION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. A. Context, Subsidiarity Check and Objectives

Republic of Serbia BILATERAL SCREENING Chapter 22 Regional Policy and Coordination of Structural Instruments INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK

GOVERNANCE, TOOLS AND POLICY CYCLE OF EUROPE 2020

REGIONAL STATE AID. Article 107 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), in particular 107(3) (a) and (c) thereof.

Challenges Of The Indirect Management Of Eu Funds In Albania

COHESION POLICY

EU Cohesion Policy- ESF

Martina Kadunc Better Regulation DG Research & Innovation

Financial Instruments in Energy Efficiency in Lithuania Agnė KAZLAUSKAITĖ, Ministry of Finance Junona BUMELYTĖ, EIB

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DECISIONS

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Follow-up by the European Commission to the EU-ACP JPA on the resolution on private sector development strategy, including innovation, for sustainable

Evaluation and Monitoring of EU Structural and Cohesion Funds Programmes, Introduction. What is this course about?

Mutual Learning Exercise What synergies between ESIF and FPs? Madrid, Jan Experiences from Greece Dimitris Deniozos

Investing inregions and cities: EU Cohesion Policy Cohesion policy

ECTRI INPUT Public consultation on EU funds in the area of investment, research & innovation, SMEs and single market March 2018

The Czech approach to evaluating communication activities

Studies on macro-regional strategies

Generating successful projects, developing and managing the project pipeline Trainer: Robin Smail Independent Consultant & Visiting Expert EIPA

Administrative Capacity Building linked to the management of ESI Funds

Integration of biodiversity into EU Funding

14613/15 AD/cs 1 DGG 2B

EVALUATION IN THE FIELD OF STATE AID WORKSHOP Brussels, 23 April 2013

Technical Assistance to Greece

Solidar EU Training Academy. Valentina Caimi Policy and Advocacy Adviser. European Semester Social Investment Social innovation

Recommendation for a COUNCIL DECISION. authorising the opening of negotiations for a Free Trade Agreement with New Zealand

ESF Committee - Plenary Session 30 May 2007

Curentul Juridic Juridical Current. 2018, Vol. 73, No. 2, pp

Recommendations on what the EC can do to promote uptake of EFSI by the social services sector

Multiannual Financial Framework and Agriculture & Rural Development

Evaluation questions are shown in blue and will be deleted once we upload the questionnaires

ANNEX 15 of the Commission Implementing Decision on the 2015 Annual Action programme for the Partnership Instrument

UNDP Anti-corruption initiatives in Eastern Europe. Francesco Checchi, Anti-Corruption Programme Coordinator UNDP Bratislava Regional Centre

DAC-code Sector Public Sector Policy and Administrative Management

PLANNING BUREAU SUMMARY. December 2009

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Marche Region. Ex Ante Evaluation report. Executive summary. Roma, June 2015

Annex 1. IDENTIFICATION

European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) Section for the Single Market, Production and Consumption Single Market Observatory (SMO)

EN 1 EN. Annex. Sector Policy Support Programme: Sector budget support (centralised management) DAC-code Sector Trade related adjustments

Recommendation for a COUNCIL DECISION. authorising the opening of negotiations for a Free Trade Agreement with Australia

A performance-based EU budget and its focus on real results: The key to sound financial management

Katarina Ivanković Knežević, Assistant Minister Ministry of Labour and Pension System, Republic of Croatia European Parliament, Bruxelles, 7 April

Control and audit. One of the main concerns of the EU COMM. Single audit system recommended by European Court of Auditors:

Röller/ Friederiszick/ Verouden Chief Economist Team DG COMP, European Commission*

OPINION. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/2064(INI) of the Committee on Regional Development

COHESION POLICY

Adopted on 06/12/2016, Strasbourg, at ALDE Group Meeting

LIST OF OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME "ENVIRONMENT" , PRIORITY AXIS 6 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

Horizon 2020 & Smart Specialisation

EU Cohesion Policy

IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE DRAFT EU STRUCTURAL FUNDS REGULATIONS

EU Funding for Sustainable Energy

ECONOMICAL CRISIS AND THE EUROPEAN UNION S COHESION POLICY

Gold-plating in the European Structural and Investments Funds

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

Council conclusions on the European Union Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian Region (EUSAIR)

CE TEXTE N'EST DISPONIBLE QU'EN VERSION ANGLAISE

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Annex 1: Conceptual Framework of the Swiss-Slovenian Cooperation Programme

The EU Framework Programme For Research and Innovation ( )

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament

EEA AGREEMENT - PROTOCOL 38C p. 1 PROTOCOL 38C{ 1 } ON THE EEA FINANCIAL MECHANISM ( ) Article 1

Council conclusions on the review of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region

Transcription:

MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT National Coordination Authority Cohesion Policy Czech Perspective EP, Committee on Budgets: Public Hearing on The Financing of the European Structural & Investment Funds and the link between these and other investment funds

Cohesion Policy = Policy which brings real changes

Cohesion Policy (and its ESI funds) Meets the commitment to implement a result-oriented EU budget. Is one of the main public vehicles of growth in the EU. Helps reducing disparities and supporting competitiveness and growth. Solves regional and local problems and targets investments according to specific needs while contributing to European priorities. Is one of the best monitored and evaluated policy with tangible results. By being more visible on the ground it has the potential to contribute to better integration of Europe.

Real changes through Policy Significant and tangible results with impact on economy and conditions for better living. Improvement of the public administration s strategic management and thinking. Strengthening of the horizontal and vertical partnerships (change and development is driven by society, not only by individuals). Evident contribution to transparency and communication (dialogue and win-win results).

Cohesion Policy contributes to convergence Regional GDP per capita as % of EU average

Financial support and number of projects 2008 2016 2008 2012 2016

Results and impact at a glance (examples) 4% higher GDP in 2015, 3% lower unemployment rate, 34% of all governmental capital investments from ESIF.

Example of results and impact (SMEs supported, OP EI) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Cohesion policy entails a significant spill-over effects V4 study: investment in V4 brought benefits for EU15 countries (77 mld. Euro)

Current state of play

Implementation is speeding up In calls = 83 % of main allocation Applications submitted = 68,2% Approved projects = 78 034 (22 April 2017) 528= launched calls For the past quarters increase of ten 10 % in all stages (from calls through selected operations to operations contracted) Map of the projects at dotaceeu.cz

As Programming Periods evolve

Differences 2014-2020 = real policy reform. New elements (EACs, e-cohesion, thematic concentration, integrated tools, some provisions of FN, process of designation). Systemic changes (such performance framework). Substantial complexity and robustness. = Late adoption of legislation and guidances and new issues still arise.

What makes it difficult Extension of legislation and guidances Source: presentation in Bratislava

Lessons learned/new measures at the strategic level We decreased number of operational programmes. We created Unified Methodological Environment and Monitoring System. We have developed an Integrated System of Risk Management. We introduced anti-corruption measures. We incorporated a stronger involvement of partners in OPs preparation, realization and evaluation. We implement SCOs wider, for more funds.

Lessons learned/new measures at operational level We are demanding an annual reporting of planned calls. We are coordinating a system for setting forecasts. We set up a benchmark / target related to the rate of contracted projects to be achieved by the end of 2017. We announce time schedule of calls for proposals to inform potential beneficiaries adequately ahead about the planned support.

Synergies between ESIF and other tools

Baseline and set up in CZ Synergies and complementaries are part of the (CZ) Partnership Agreement, operational programmes and methodologies. Also between ESIF programmes and Union programmes. To ensure that specific coordination mechanisms are set up. Synergies are tackled during preparation of the calls at relevant platforms (or coordination groups, working teams). For centrally managed instruments there are the National Contact Points (= other than managing authorities).

Practical examples OP RDE and Horizont 2020: the grant project HiLASE (Center of Excellence in Laser Technologies). OP EIC and Clean Sky Two: aim is to find a space for the use of the so-called Synergy Label for Clean Sky 2 quality projects (bonification in the call or special thematic call). H2020 and national resources: Technology agency of the Czech Republic announced a call to fund projects within Seal of Excellence (for small and small to medium size enterprises).

Some constraints when comparing ESIF and Centrally managed programmes Greater complexity and different coordination requirements might go against simplification. Different nature of the centrally managed programmes; for instance as far as concerns themes/support; beneficiaries; application of some rules for provision of support (such as the state aid); regime of monitoring (lack of sufficient information about specific projects) and control; eligible costs; some of them are based on high speed spending approach (causing uncertainty of achieving long-term impact); could create space for inappropriate competitiveness between various tools.

Future?

What we can / must do for future architecture We have learnt our part. We know what are the challenges. We know what to do. We are committed to changing the system. What we change now could mean simplification for the future perspective and better investments.

Building blocks of the future framework Strategic vision 2030 and achievable goals in the EU also for Cohesion Policy. Continuity no radical revolution at the strategic level (lessons learned from the previous periods). Shared management as a main principle of Cohesion Policy. Simplicity (beneficiaries view in the process has to of be crucial). Higher, trust-based legal certainty of the decision-making.

Building blocks of the future framework Flexibility on the strategic, programming and implementation level. Role of audits (to be built around trust and legal certainty, responsibility, prevention, subsidiarity, proportionality, result orientation, training, value-formoney, communication and cooperation). Clear accountability on all levels. Harmonization of the rules across all EU programmes policies (e.g. state aid, public procurements, unification of terminology) and better coordination. Better and targeted visibility of Cohesion Policy.

For more information see also dotaceeu.cz Dotaceeu.cz (main gateway to ESI funds in CZ) Includes also updated data about implementation; all the documents, publications etc.

Thank you for your attention David Škorňa Director of the Partnership Agreement, evaluation and strategy Department NCA, Ministry of Regional Development (CZ)