Transportation Funding in the Charlotte Region

Similar documents
NCDOT Funding Overview

Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation

Transportation Primer

21 st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee

Transportation Funding Overview. Travis Brouwer, ODOT Assistant Director House Transportation Policy Committee March 8, 2017

Alabama Transportation Conference. February 9 th, 2015

The Oregon Department of Transportation Budget

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

State DOT Revenue Distribution Strategies. Final Report. Prepared for. Michigan Department of Transportation. Prepared by

Transportation Trust Fund Overview

TRANSPORTATION FUNDING IN THE STATES

$1,516 $925 $19 $2,460 $422 $1,270 $261 $413 $94 = $715 = $274 = $62 = $13 = $555 = $19 = $148 & HWY

APPENDIX B TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

Transportation Revenue Options and State Funding Initiatives

Transportation Finance Overview. Presentation Contents

Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee June 22, 2015 and July 13, 2015

Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance

Prioritization and Programming Process. NCDOT Division of Planning and Programming November 16, 2016

FUNDING AND FINANCE FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS STATE FUNDING OPTIONS

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY

STATE MOTOR FUEL TAX INCREASES:

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 SESSION LAW SENATE BILL 20

Other States Models. House Select Committee on Strategic Transportation Planning and Long Term Funding Solutions.

Countywide Dialogue on Transportation

Short Title: IRC Update/Motor Fuel Tax Changes. (Public) February 4, 2015

Act 89 of January 2014

NRI COMMITTEE SESSION

Transportation Funding State Comparisons. 21 st Century Transportation Committee August 21, 2008

Short Title: IRC Update/Motor Fuel Tax Changes. (Public) February 4, 2015

Increased Transportation Infrastructure Investment Critical to State s Continued Economic Development

Indiana Transportation Funding Update

FY Statewide Capital Investment Strategy... asset management, performance-based strategic direction

5/3/2016. May 4, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Financial Forecasting Assumptions for Plan 2040 (DRAFT)

Technical Appendix. FDOT 2040 Revenue Forecast

STATE MOTOR FUEL TAX INCREASES:

Technical Report No. 4. Revenue and Costs

FISCAL IMPACT ($ in millions) FY FY FY FY FY $35.5 ($5.2) ($10.1) ($2.3) ($2.3) ($2.3) ($2.

Comparison of Local Transportation Revenue Sources in Selected States

Fiscal Year Commonwealth Transportation Fund Budget June 2015

APPENDIX FOR THE METROPOLITAN LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Forecast of State and Federal Revenues for Statewide and Metropolitan Plans

INVESTMENT STRATEGIES

FY LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST OVERVIEW

NCDOT Public Private Partnerships P3 s Financing

Material Comparison ( ) County Engineer s Cost Saving Methods/ Grants How would increased revenues be used?

N A D O N A D O R E S E A R C H F O U N D AT I O N R P O A M E R I C A

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE

Transportation Finance: An Overview

Keep Wisconsin Moving Smart Investments Measurable Results

Alabama. Base Registration Fee: $23. Time Frame: Additional Notes: Annual

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 S 3 SENATE BILL 20 Finance Committee Substitute Adopted 2/10/15 Third Edition Engrossed 2/12/15

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY

TESTIMONY. The Texas Transportation Challenge. Testimony Before the Study Commission on Transportation Financing

TECHNICAL PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA 3/18/2015; ITEM II.B. Amendment Number Four to the FY Transportation Improvement Program

Understanding H.B. 170: The Transportation Funding Act of 2015

Fiscal Year Commonwealth Transportation Fund Budget June 2014

STATE AND LOCAL TAXES A Comparison Across States

CRTPO Project Selection Direct Attributable & Bonus Allocation Funds

Chapter 6: Financial Resources

Make HTF Great Again: Fast Act and Highway Trust Fund

April 25, Martin Klepper Executive Director

A Guide to. Provided by: The Road Commission for Oakland County. October, Visit RCOC online at

Chapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance

Interested Parties William E. Hamilton Transportation Needs and Revenue Distribution

Presented by: Christy A. Hall, P.E. Interim Secretary of Transportation. January 2016

Development of the Cost Feasible Plan

The Future of Transportation. Secretary Jim Trogdon October 2, 2017

Fiscal Year Commonwealth Transportation Fund Budget June 2018

MPACT64. Transportation Infrastructure for Colorado. We Can t Afford to Wait

Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions

MPOAC REVENUE STUDY. Study Update Northwest Florida Regional TPO January 18, 2012

Wake County. People love to be connected. In our cyberspace. transit plan CONNECTING PEOPLE, CONNECTING THE COUNTY

REPORT OF THE INTERMODAL COMMITTEE AND EXPLANATION OF CONGESTION RELIEF AND INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION 21 ST CENTURY FUND

OVERVIEW: Minnesota Transportation Finance

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission

DOTD s Response to House Resolution 178 (2016)

TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF TASK FORCE COMMITTEE ACTIVITY

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Metro Budget Overview

Meeting Future Transportation Funding Needs

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY

SURVEY OF STATE FUNDING FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

WELCOME AND INTRODUCTORY REMARKS

STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROPOSALS SINCE 2013

Chairman Wathan Spade, Executive Director

Emilia Istrate, Senior Research Analyst. July 28, 2009 Washington DC

Transportation Funds Forecast November 2018

Distributing Transportation Funds

Primary Sources of County Road Funding

Cost Feasible Plan Technical Report TRANSPORTATION OUTLOOK 2035 OKALOOSA-WALTON 2035 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE.

APPENDIX I REVENUE PROJECTION AND ASSUMPTIONS

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD. Transportation Funding Options

MAP-21 Policy Themes and Perspectives

ALL Counties. ALL Districts

Stabilizing Missouri s Highway Funding Tom Kruckemeyer, Chief Economist Amy Blouin, Executive Director

Technical Report #2: Financial Resources Final Adopted Plan January 2016

Transportation Funds Forecast November 2017

Financial Snapshot October 2014

Mobility Plans and Fees in Florida

Transcription:

Transportation Funding in the Charlotte Region Andy Grzymski, Charlotte DOT August 21, 2007 Charlotte Region HOV/HOT/ Managed Lanes Study Workshop

Background

The Charlotte Region One of the South s s Key Economic Centers Year Population # of Employees Person Trips per Day 2000 1.6 million 0.9 million 5.2 million 2030 3.1 million 1.7 million 10.0 million 94% population growth 89% employment growth

Crossroads of Commerce 6 of NC s 13 Intermodal Terminals located in Charlotte region

Regional Travel Destination In 2000 960,000 trips per day from surrounding counties One in three jobs held by commuters from adjacent counties By 2030 an additional 1.2 million trips per day will cross Mecklenburg County line

NCDOT Facts Roads Bridges Ferries Rail Public Transportation Aviation Bicycle and Pedestrian Addition Support 2nd largest state system 2nd largest, 18,540 377 miles 2nd largest system, 23 ferries Passenger & Freight Support, 4,350 crossings County, Urban & Regional Support General Aviation Support, 63 airports 3,000 mile state system Highway Patrol, Contributions to Municipal Budgets and General Fund

SCDOT Facts Roads Bridges Ferries Rail Public Transportation Aviation Bicycle and Pedestrian Addition Support 4 th largest state system 9 th largest, 8,329 280 centerline miles Local Ferry Support, One Ferry Freight support, 2693 crossings Urban, rural, regional support, 24 providers 6 commercial, 64 municipal, 17 heliports 1,550 miles state system Contribute to State Infrastructure Bank, local sales tax, C-funds

System Responsibility US Average State Lane-Miles and Ranking Texas 1 North Carolina 2 Virginia 3 South Carolina 4 Georgia Florida 13 11-40,000 80,000 120,000 160,000 200,000 Lane-Miles

NC Population Growth 14 12 10 (in Millions) 8 6 Rank:11 Rank:11 Rank:10 Rank:10 Rank:9 Rank:8 Rank:7 4 (VA - 12 SC - 26) (Surpassing New Jersey) (Surpassing Michigan) (S ur pa ssi ng Georgia) (Surpassing Ohio) 2 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

NC Population Growth 14 12 10 (in Millions) 8 6 4 2 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

SC Population Growth 14 12 10 (in Millions) 8 6 4 2 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Funding Issues

North Carolina Growth 300% 250% 200% 150% Vehicle Miles Traveled Population DOT Budget in 2005 $ (State Funds Only) 100% 50% 0% -50% 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Inflation 100% 80% Construction Inflation 2001 to 2005 +45% Since 2003 60% 40% 20% 0% Concrete Steel Asphalt

Growing Funding Gap (NC State Long Range Transportation Plan) Timeframe 2001 to 2025 $55 Billion $84 Billion DRAFT ESTIMATE Timeframe 2005 to 2030 $57 Billion $122 Billion

SC Funding Gap (Updated in January 2005 in 2004 dollars) $19.4 Billion $60.3 Billion

NCDOT FY 2006 Budget 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% $5.2M $1.6 B $1.1 B $890 M General Fund Highway Fund Highway Trust Fund Federal Aid Total Funding = $3.63 Billion

Federal-Aid Derived from federal fuel tax (18.4 cent gas tax, 24.4 cent diesel tax) Annual formula-based apportionments to states Can pay for core programs, intrastate and secondary roads Subject to equity formula (NC) Core programs have specific purposes, thus limited flexibility Flat long-term growth when considering inflation disappointing results from federal re-authorization bill obligation authority only 86 percent

Reduced Federal Outlook 50 40 Receipts Outlays EOY Balance 30 $ in Billions 20 10-1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 (10) (20)

Highway Fund (NC) Derived from state fuel tax (22.4 cents) and fees (inspections, license fees, registration, etc.) Can pay for maintenance, Powell Bill, transit, bridges and operations Not subject to equity formula Not used for TIP highway projects Flat long-term growth when considering inflation recent fee increases helped

Highway Fund (SC) Derived from state fuel tax (16.25 cents) and fees (general fund, license fees, registration, interest, tolls, etc.) Can pay for maintenance, administration, federal match, county transportation committees (CTC), transit, toll operations and safety. Flat long-term growth when considering inflation last gas tax increase in 1987

Highway Trust Fund Derived from state fuel tax (7.5 cents), fees, and 3% Highway Use Tax Established in 1989 Has specific statutory purposes Primarily for completion of 3600-mile intrastate system and construction of designated Urban Loops Intrastates subject to equity formula, but secondary roads, urban loops, and Powell Bill are not Positive long-term growth Governor s s budget reduced General fund transfer from $250 M to $170 M but trust fund is restricted to projects mandated by the Legislature

Regional Roads Committee Needs Assessment for Charlotte Region (13 counties) 2000 Needs 41 projects $4 billion total cost $2 billion needed to complete $2 billion funded 2007 Status 9 completed projects 12 unfunded projects 20 projects underway $6 billion total cost $4 billion still needed to complete $2 billion funded $1.0 billion toll funding $1.0 billion TIP funding

Transportation Action Plan (TAP) The City of Charlotte s s first long-range, comprehensive multi-modal modal transportation plan

Proposed 25-year Expenditures in $3.57 Billion TAP, by Category $2.54 B Motorists Pedestrians $0.05 B $0.54 B Bicycles Livable Neighborhoods $0.45 B

Ways of Funding Transportation Used Nationwide Sales Tax Personal Income Tax Cigarette Tax Liquid Fuels Tax Motor Vehicle Rental Tax Motor Vehicle Lease Tax Vehicle Registration Fee Vehicle Title Fee Tire Tax Vehicle Property Tax Property Tax Real Estate Transfer Tax Transportation Impact Fees Casino Revenue Lottery Highway/Bridge Toll Revenue

Questions and Comments

Equity Formula Established in 1989 Urban Loops, Secondary Roads, and Powell Bill Excluded Applies to NCDOT Funding Regions 50% POPULATION OF REGION AS PERCENT OF STATE 25% REMAINING INTRASTATE SYSTEM MILES 25% EQUAL SHARE When 90% of Intrastate System is complete, the formula will change 66% POPULATION OF REGION AS PERCENT OF STATE 34% EQUAL SHARE

NCDOT Funding Regions F D A G E C B

NCDOT Divisions 11 14 13 12 9 10 7 8 6 5 3 4 2 1

Equity Formula Distribution to Region E Assume $100 subject to Equity Formula $50 distributed by population share 18.98% of $50 = $9.49 $25 distributed by miles-to to-complete of intrastate system 15.85% of $25 = $3.96 $25 distributed equally among seven funding regions 14.29% of $25 = $3.57 Region E receives $9.49 + $3.96 + $3.57 = $17.02 out of every $100 allocated in NC