REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. on EAGF expenditure. Early Warning System No 4-5/2015

Similar documents
REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. on EAGF expenditure. Early Warning System No 4-6/2018

Early warning system. No 4-6/2010

POLICY AREA 05 IN HEADING 2: Justification of the appropriations requested in the Amending Letter No 1 compared to the Draft Budget 2018

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

AMENDING LETTER No 1 TO THE DRAFT GENERAL BUDGET 2018

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF THE EUROPEAN AGRICULTURAL FUNDS

L 346/12 Official Journal of the European Union

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

Council of the European Union Brussels, 31 May 2017 (OR. en) Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

DRAFT AMENDING BUDGET No 5 TO THE GENERAL BUDGET 2017

The CAP after Round tables on the green architecture of the CAP. #FutureofCAP. Brussels, 12 November 2018

7611/16 MDL/io 1 DGB 1 A

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

Council of the European Union Brussels, 16 October 2014 (OR. en) Mr Uwe CORSEPIUS, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

AMENDING LETTER No 1 TO THE DRAFT GENERAL BUDGET STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE BY SECTION Section III Commission Section VIII European Ombudsman

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

7826/18 JPS/ab 1 DG G 2A

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. 31st FINANCIAL REPORT

COM (2018) 533. Information Note

DRAFT AMENDING BUDGET No 6 TO THE GENERAL BUDGET 2018

HEADING 2 SUSTAINABLE GROWTH NATURAL RESOURCES

Annual Activity Report

5620/18 LA/fh DGB 1A. Council of the European Union Brussels, 9 February 2018 (OR. en) 5620/18. Interinstitutional File: 2017/0269 (NLE)

12236/12 JR/fk 1 DG B 1

The CAP towards 2020

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

Official Journal of the European Union

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

DRAFT AMENDING BUDGET No 5 TO THE GENERAL BUDGET 2018

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. 30th FINANCIAL REPORT THE EUROPEAN AGRICULTURAL GUIDANCE AND GUARANTEE FUND EAGGF GUARANTEE SECTION

COMMISSION DECISION. of adopting the PERICLES annual work programme 2013 serving as a financing decision for 2013

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

Call for Applications for Financial Assistance for the Organisation of EJN Regional and National meetings

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

COMMISSION OPINION. of on the Draft Budgetary Plan of Spain. {SWD(2018) 515 final}

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Official Journal of the European Union L 379/49

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

3. In certain circumstances, intervention purchases or private storage aid may operate to remove surplus production from the market.

COMMISSION OPINION. of on the Draft Budgetary Plan of Portugal. {SWD(2017) 525 final}

AMENDING LETTER No 1 TO THE DRAFT GENERAL BUDGET 2019

DRAFT AMENDING BUDGET N 1 TO THE GENERAL BUDGET 2014 STATEMENT OF REVENUE BY SECTION. STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE BY SECTION Section III Commission

Council of the European Union Brussels, 6 April 2017 (OR. en)

Council of the European Union Brussels, 2 December 2015 (OR. en) Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Funding and functioning of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund

Official Journal of the European Union L 144/3

Active Monitoring and Forecast of Budget Implementation Summer Information Note

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

Official Journal of the European Union REGULATIONS

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION 2014 DRAFT BUDGETARY PLANS OF THE EURO AREA: OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE BUDGETARY SITUATION AND PROSPECTS

12818/10 IM/NC/ks DDTE

Commission to recover 54.3 million of CAP expenditure from the Member States

17145/1/12 REV 1 AR/kg 1 DG G II A

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

DRAFT AMENDING BUDGET N 6 TO THE GENERAL BUDGET 2014 GENERAL STATEMENT OF REVENUE

Exchange of views on TRQs

COMMISSION DECISION. of

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Amended proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

COMMISSION DECISION. of

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

DRAFT REVISED GUIDANCE NOTE ON MAJOR PROJECTS IN THE PROGRAMMING PERIOD : THRESHOLD AND CONTENTS OF COMMISSION DECISIONS

EU Competition Law. Rules Applicable to Antitrust Enforcement. Volume III: Situation as at 1st July Competition

Guidance for Member States on the Drawing of Management Declaration and Annual Summary

Active Monitoring and Forecast of Budget Implementation Autumn Information Note

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of XXX

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

Committee on Legal Affairs NOTICE TO MEMBERS (27/2011)

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

Analysis of the budgetary implementation of the European Structural and Investment Funds in 2014

AMENDING LETTER No 1 TO THE DRAFT GENERAL BUDGET 2017

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

COMMISSION DECISION. of ON THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF THE SCHENGEN FACILITY IN CROATIA. (only the English text is authentic)

COMMISSION DECISION. of

A. INTRODUCTION AND FINANCING OF THE GENERAL BUDGET. EXPENDITURE Description Budget Budget Change (%)

COMMISSION DECISION. of

LIMITE EN CONFERENCE ON ACCESSION TO THE EUROPEAN UNION CROATIA. Brussels, 29 June 2011 AD 30/11 LIMITE CONF-HR 17

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Amended proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Exchange of views on TRQs

NATIONAL BANK OF SERBIA. Vice Governor Markovic s Speech at the Presentation of the May Inflation Report

Council of the European Union Brussels, 17 October 2016 (OR. en) Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

This note has been prepared by the Directorate-General for Regional Policy.

ANNEX. to the. Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. amending Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency

Council of the European Union Brussels, 23 March 2017 (OR. en)

PUBLIC. Luxembourg,17June2014 (OR.en) COUNCILOF THEEUROPEANUNION 10518/14 LIMITE ECOFIN562 UEM184

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Mono-Beneficiary Model Grant Agreement

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 22 November 2013 (OR. en) 2013/0156 (COD) PE-CONS 101/13 FSTR 130 FC 75 REGIO 229 SOC 848 CADREFIN 263 FIN 668 CODEC 2323

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

Transcription:

Ref. Ares(2015)1868076-04/05/2015 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX [ ](2015) XXX draft REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on EAGF expenditure Early Warning System No 4-5/2015 N.B. This report has received the favourable opinion of the Commission services but it has not yet been formally adopted by the Commission. Therefore, its final version may still be subject to amendments. EN EN

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction...3 2. Revenue assigned to EAGF...3 3. Comments on the provisional implementation of the 2015 EAGF budget...4 4. Implementation of revenue assigned to EAGF...6 5. Conclusions...6 ANNEX 1: PROVISIONAL CONSUMPTION OF EAGF APPROPRIATIONS UP TO 31/03/2015 2

1. INTRODUCTION This report presents an update of the provisional 2015 budget execution for the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF). In particular, Annex 1 presents the comparison between the actual level of the implementation of the EAGF budget for the period 16 October 2014 to 31 March 2015 and the forecasted expenditure profile. The latter results from the application of the indicator to the level of the budgetary appropriations. The indicator is established on the basis of the provisions of Article 28 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy 1. 2. REVENUE ASSIGNED TO EAGF Under Article 43 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013, the revenue originating from financial corrections under accounting and conformity clearance decisions, from irregularities and from the milk levy is designated as revenue assigned to the financing of EAGF expenditure. The assigned revenue can be used to cover the financing of any EAGF expenditure. If part of this revenue is not used within the budget year, then, this part will be automatically carried forward to the following budget year 2. The 2015 EAGF budget, as adopted by the Budgetary Authority included both: the Commission's estimates of the needs to finance the expected expenditure for market measures and direct payments, and the estimates of the assigned revenue which was expected to be collected in budget year 2015 as well as the assigned revenue carried over from the budget year 2014. At the time of establishing the 2015 budget, the Commission s estimates of the assigned revenue amounted to EUR 1 768.6 million. This included: The assigned revenue expected to be generated in the course of the 2015 budget year estimated at EUR 1 438.6 million, i.e.: EUR 868.6 million for conformity clearance corrections, EUR 165 million for irregularities and EUR 405 million for the receipts from the milk levy. The amount of assigned revenue expected to be carried over from the budget year 2014 into 2015 estimated at EUR 330 million. In the 2015 budget, the Commission assigned this initially estimated revenue of EUR 1 768.6 million to the budget items in the following articles: 05 02 08 Fruit and vegetables: EUR 469.3 million 3 1 2 3 OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p.549 Art 14 of Regulation (EU, EURATOM) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union determines that internal assigned revenue shall be carried over for one year only. Thus, in the interest of sound budgetary management, this assigned revenue is in general used first before any voted appropriation of the budget article concerned. EUR 362.4 million to the operational funds for producer organisations in fruit and vegetables and EUR 106.9 million to the other measures in fruit and vegetables 3

05 02 12 Milk and milk products: EUR 54.3 million 4 05 03 01 Decoupled direct payments: EUR 1 245 million 5. For these schemes, the Budgetary Authority eventually voted appropriations in accordance with the Commission s proposal. The sum of the voted appropriations and the assigned revenue mentioned above corresponds to a total estimate of needs. In annex 1, the figures of the budget appropriations at article level for fruit and vegetables, for milk and milk products and for the decoupled direct payments relate to the voted appropriations for these articles amounting to EUR 836.2 million, to EUR 77.1 million and to EUR 37 397 million respectively, without taking account of the aforementioned assigned revenue. Including the revenue assigned to these articles, the total appropriations foreseen in the 2015 budget amount to EUR 1 305.5 million for fruit and vegetables, EUR 131.4 million for milk and milk products and to EUR 38 642 million for decoupled direct payments. 3. COMMENTS ON THE PROVISIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2015 EAGF BUDGET The budget s provisional implementation for the period 16 October 2014 to 31 March 2015, as presented in Annex 1, is compared to the expenditure profile based on the indicator established in accordance with Article 28 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013. Below a brief commentary is presented for certain budget articles, showing the most significant differences between the actual and the expected level of implementation of the 2015 budget. 3.1. Market measures The uptake of appropriations for interventions in agricultural markets was lower compared to the level of the budget's voted appropriations, as determined by the level of the indicator on 31 March 2015, by EUR 12.0 million. This divergence is the net effect of the execution patterns primarily in the fruits and vegetables, milk and milk products and wine sectors. 3.1.1. Fruit and vegetables (+ EUR 70.3 million in comparison with voted appropriations) This implementation level is primarily due to the expenditure for the operational funds for producer organisations scheme and other measures in fruit and vegetables, which are funded both by the voted appropriations and by the assigned revenue (NB: For details please see point 2 above). In contrast, the indicator for the period to 31 March 2015 is applied only to the budget s voted appropriations of EUR 836.2 million, thus not taking into account the assigned revenue. A footnote * in the provisional execution table in annex 1 shows what the situation would be, had the indicator been applied to the total appropriations for this article including the assigned revenue of EUR 469.3 million. Had the indicator been applied to the total funding expected to be available for this article (EUR 1 305.5 million), then an under-execution of - EUR 41.2 million would appear. This is the effect of a slower uptake of all the schemes funded by this article except for the other measures in fruit and vegetables (budget item 05 02 08 99). It should be noted that the pace of the uptake of budgetary appropriations for the crisis measures, 4 5 EUR 0.9 million to the storage measures for skimmed milk powder, EUR 2.9 million to the storage measures for butter and cream and EUR 50.5 million to the other measures in milk and milk products The entire amount to the single payment scheme 4

available under the operational funds for producer organisations and other measures in fruit and vegetables could not be reliably estimated. Thus it is likely to diverge from a 3-year average consumption profile which is the basis for the indicator for this article. At this point in time, this situation is considered to be temporary and the execution of this article is closely monitored by the Commission services. 3.1.2. Products of the wine-growing sector (- EUR 105.3 million) This under-execution is due to a slower rhythm of payments made by the Member States compared to the expenditure profile of the established indicator for the national wine programmes. At this point in time, this situation is considered to be temporary. 3.1.3. Milk and milk products (+ EUR 23.1 million) This implementation level is primarily due to the expenditure for the storage and for the other measures in milk and milk products (budget item 05 02 12 99), which are funded both by the voted appropriations and by the assigned revenue (NB: For details please see point 2 above). In contrast, the indicator for the period to 31 March 2015 is applied only to the budget s voted appropriations of EUR 77.1 million, thus not taking into account the assigned revenue. A footnote * in the provisional execution table in annex 1 shows what the situation would be, had the indicator been applied to the total appropriations for this article including the assigned revenue of EUR 54.3 million. Had the indicator been applied to the total funding expected to be available for this article (EUR 131.4 million), then an under-execution of - EUR 11.8 million would appear. This is predominantly the effect of a slower uptake of the appropriations for the school milk scheme. Moreover it should be noted that the pace of the uptake of budgetary appropriations for the crisis measures, available for the storage and for the other measures in milk and milk products could not be reliably estimated. Thus the profile of expenditure is likely to diverge from a 3-year average which is the basis for the indicator for this article. At this point in time, this situation is considered to be temporary and the execution of this article is closely monitored by the Commission services. 3.2. Direct payments The uptake of appropriations for direct payments compared to the level of the indicator on 31 March 2015 was higher by EUR 894.1 million. 3.2.1. Decoupled direct payments (+EUR 1 041.7 million in comparison with voted appropriations) This implementation level is primarily due to the expenditure for the single payment scheme, which is funded both by the voted appropriations and by the assigned revenue (NB: For details please see point 2 above). In contrast, the indicator for the period to 31 March 2015 is applied only to the budget s voted appropriations of EUR 37 397 million, thus not taking into account the assigned revenue. A footnote * in the provisional execution table in annex 1 shows what the situation would be, had the indicator been applied to the total appropriations for this article including the assigned revenue of EUR 1 245 million. Had the indicator been applied 5

to the total funding expected to be available for this article (EUR 38 642 million), then an under-execution of EUR 178 million would appear. This divergence in the level of implementation of the budget for decoupled direct payments results primarily from an accelerated rhythm of payments for the single payment scheme in the first two months of the year (as compared to the similar period in three previous years) and a slight slowing down since January. Judging from Member States' forecast, the execution is expected to regain speed in the coming months. As regards the redistributive payment scheme, 2015 being the first year of its implementation, the actual execution seems also slightly behind the expected payment profile. At this stage this is also expected to be a temporary divergence. The Commission expects, at this point in time, that available appropriations and assigned revenue would be sufficient to cover the funding needs for this article. 3.2.2. Other direct payments (- EUR 147.6 million) This under-implementation of voted appropriations for other direct payments as compared to the expenditure profile of the established indicator on 31 March 2015 is mainly the effect of the slower payment rhythm for suckler-cow premium and specific support under article 68 coupled direct payments. At this point in time, judging from Member States' forecast, this situation is considered to be temporary. 4. IMPLEMENTATION OF REVENUE ASSIGNED TO EAGF The table in annex 1 shows that assigned revenue amounting to EUR 1 243.3 million was collected as of 31 March 2015. Specifically: the revenue from corrections based on accounting and conformity clearance decisions amounted to EUR 746.3 million with some amounts still expected by the end of the budget year; the revenue from irregularities amounted to EUR 88.8 million with additional amounts also expected by the end of the budget year, and at this point in time, the entire revenue from the milk levy has been collected and it amounts to approximately EUR 408.2 million; Finally, the amount of assigned revenue eventually carried over from 2014 into 2015 amounted to EUR 341.3 million. Therefore, the amount of assigned revenue available for financing EAGF expenditure, on 31 March 2015, amounts to EUR 1 584.6 million with additional amounts of freshly collected assigned revenue from accounting and conformity clearance decisions and irregularities expected by the end of the budget year. 5. CONCLUSIONS The provisional execution of the 2015 EAGF budget's appropriations, for the period up to 31 March 2015, shows that monthly reimbursements to Member States exceeded the expenditure profile for budget execution based on the indicator, by approximately EUR 885.1 million. Assigned revenue amounting to EUR 1 584.6 million is already available and additional amounts are still expected to be collected in 2015. 6

At this point in time, the Commission considers that the amounts of the voted appropriations and the assigned revenue already available and expected by the end of the year will be sufficient to cover the needs of the EAGF in 2015, including the implementation of the crisis measures as originally expected when the 2015 budget was established. 7