Next Generation Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Model Overview

Similar documents
Predictive Qualifying Alternative Payment Model (APM) Participants (QPs) Methodology Fact Sheet What is the Predictive QP Status Analysis?

Request for Applications

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Seamless Care Models Group 7205 Windsor Blvd Baltimore, MD 21244

2018 Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Scoring Overview

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Seamless Care Models Group 7205 Windsor Blvd Baltimore, MD 21244

CMS PROPOSES KEY PROVISIONS OF MACRA PHYSICIAN PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR 2019

April 10, THN Approval Council: Compliance and Integrity Committee

PRIMER: MACRA and the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Tara O Neill Hayes January 31, 2016

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Seamless Care Models Group 7205 Windsor Blvd Baltimore, MD 21244

CY 2018 Quality Payment Program Final Rule Summary

Medicare Releases Final Rule for the Second Year of the Quality Payment Program

MACRA Final Rule Summary

Fact Sheet: 2019 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Payment Adjustments based on 2017 MIPS Final Scores

CMS 1701 P UnityPoint Health. October 16, 2018

Copyright Scottsdale Institute All Rights Reserved.

QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM YEAR 3 (2019) FINAL RULE OVERVIEW

2018 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Cost Performance Category Fact Sheet

The ACO Track One+ Model: New Rewards for Risk

NAACOS Analysis Shows ACOs In Top MIPS Performance Tier

QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM YEAR 3 (2019) FINAL RULE OVERVIEW NOVEMBER 15, 2018

CPC+ PAYMENT METHODOLOGIES: BENEFICIARY ATTRIBUTION, CARE MANAGEMENT FEE, PERFORMANCE-BASED INCENTIVE PAYMENT, AND PAYMENT UNDER THE MEDICARE

The Future Of Medicare Physician Reimbursement

Growth and Success of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) in the US from Dennis Horrigan June 2016

MEDICARE ACCESS AND CHIP REAUTHORIZATION ACT (MACRA) MERIT-BASED INCENTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM (MIPS) REVIEW

Quality Payment Program Year 3

No change from proposed rule. healthcare providers and suppliers of services (e.g.,

Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced

Proposed Changes to the Medicare Shared Savings Program for Accountable Care Organizations

Proposed 2018 Medicare Physician Payment and Quality Reporting Changes. Executive s Insights

2018 Quality Payment Program Final Rule. Summary

Medicare s Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations Proposed Rule

2018 Quality Measure Benchmarks Overview

Key Financial and Operational Impacts from the Proposed Rule to Implement MACRA:

December 19, Dear Acting Administrator Slavitt:

AAOS MACRA Proposed Rule Summary (Short)

The MACRA Proposed Rule on MIPS and APMs: Summary and Key Takeaways

Medicare Accountable Care Organizations What & Why?

FAQs: Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs)

September 6, Submitted on September 6, 2016 via Dear Acting Administrator Slavitt:

Advancing Risk Capability in 2015: Medicare Shared Savings Program and ACO Investment Model. March 23, 2015 // 12:00 P.M. 1:00 P.M.

Medicare Accountable Care Organization Track 1+ Model. March 22, 2017

Appendix B. LDO Financial Methodology (LDO CEC Model)

Summary of the Quality Payment Program (QPP) Year 2 Final Rule

MACRA: New Medicare Reimbursement Models Sharp HealthCare

Collaborative Health Systems a Universal American company. CHS and ACO Overview May 2016

Topics to be covered. Do I have to participate in MACRA/MIPS/QPP? Choices for participation. Timelines. What is changing with QPP

2010 HEALTHCARE STRATEGY GROUP

CMS Quality Payment Program

Final Policy, Payment, and Quality Provisions in the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for Calendar Year 2018

The Medicare Shared Savings Program. November 2011

The ACO Effort: A Status Report

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Advancing Care Coordination through Episode Payment Models Program Years: October 1, December 31, 2021

Housekeeping. Questions

MACRA, MIPS, APMs & CPC+: What to Expect from All These Acronyms?! Monthly National Briefing April 26, 2016

ALSTON&BIRD LLP. Summary of Agency Proposals Related to Accountable Care Organizations and the Medicare Shared Savings Program. I.

4/8/17. The Changing Nature of Physician Payment and Health Care Reform in The AMA A Unifying Voice for Physicians

The New MSSP Final Rule; What's Next for the Future of ACOs?

Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (HR. 2; MACRA)

All About APMs: What Will It Take for Physicians to Earn the APM Bonus Under MACRA?

Physical Address: (Number) (Street) (City) (State) (Zip Code) Date of ACO Formation Date of Incorporation:

MACRA: Redefining How CMS Pays Doctors. White Paper ELLIS MAC KNIGHT, MD DAN KIEHL, JD CONTACT. Senior Vice President/CMO. Associate Consultant

2019 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Cost Performance Category Fact Sheet

5 critical issues for BPCI-A

Get Straight on MACRA in 2018

A Practical Discussion of Value and Quality Based Payments What Do I Do Now?

HEALTH ECONOMICS AND REIMBURSEMENT

MACRA Overview. April 2016

Health Care Policy Landscape: Market Trends & Frontline Perspectives

Quality Payment Program Year 2

Cardiac Bundle (AMI, CABG, and SHFFT), CR and ACO Track 1+ January 11, 2017

Medicare Quality Payment Program Overview (MACRA)

9/7/17. MACRA: The Knowns and the Unknowns. Disclosures. Goals and Objectives

Medicare Program; Advancing Care Coordination Through Episode Payment. Models (EPMs); Cardiac Rehabilitation Incentive Payment Model; and Changes to

A Guide to Submitting Medicaid Requests for Other Payer Advanced APM Determinations (Payer Initiated Submission Form)

MACRA: Alternative Payment Models Proposed Rule CY 2016

9/23/2016. Our Services. Transitioning from Fee-for-Service to Value-based Reimbursement. Key Trends and Strategies for Rural Health Providers

Medicare Comprehensive ESRD Care (CEC) Initiative

Understanding and Facilitating Rural Health Transformation

Thank you, and enjoy the webinar.

Government Issues Eagerly Awaited Proposed ACO Regulations

Overview of Medicare Program; Medicare Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations

You Down with QPP? Daniel Collins Director of Finance Orlando Health Physician Enterprise

The Road to Value. Aric R. Sharp, MHA, CMPE, FACHE Vice President Accountable Care UnityPoint Health February 3, 2017

Medicare Program; Medicare Shared Savings Program: Extreme and Uncontrollable. AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

MACRA: THE FINAL RULE. Last updated 12/13/16

Value Based Purchasing

ACO Essentials Series

Health care affordability VBC transformation

21% Total Medicare Beneficiaries (2017): 58 million

Health Industry Forum Key Policy Issues in the Evolution of Medicare ACO Programs

Other Payer Advanced APM Determination

Awardee: Meridian Hospitals Corporation d/b/a Jersey Shore University Medical Center

Scripps Health ACO Update

March 28, Dear Administrator Slavitt:

October 16, Ms. Seema Verma Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland

MACRA Medicare Payment Reform and the Implications to Medicare Advantage Plans

MACRA Update: The Top 8 For Amy Mullins, MD, CPE, FAAFP Medical Director, Quality Improvement AAFP

THE HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY HAS EXPERIENCED A SEISMIC EVENT. THE COMPETITIVE BEDROCK IS STILL SHIFTING.

Stakeholder Innovation Group (SIG):

RUPRI Center for Rural Health Policy Analysis. Rural Policy Brief. Brief No NOVEMBER

Transcription:

The Physicians Advocacy Institute s Medicare Quality Payment Program (QPP) Physician Education Initiative Next Generation Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Model Overview Ad 1 P a g e

MEDICARE QPP PHYSICIAN EDUCATION INITIATIVE Next Generation Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Model Overview An Advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM) is one of two pathways physicians can choose under the Quality Payment Program (QPP), which was established as part of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA). Under the Advanced APM pathway, physicians may be exempt from participation in the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and be eligible to receive a 5% incentive payment. For successful participation in an Advanced APM, physicians need to consider three core building blocks: Understanding the basic principles of population health models Understanding the variables and rules impacting performance under specific Advanced APMs Understanding the relevant QPP rules relating to participation thresholds and requirements This resource focuses on the second of these three building blocks: understanding the variables and rules impacting performance under specific Advanced APMs, specifically the Next Generation Accountable Care Organization (Next Gen ACO) model. 2 P a g e

The Next Gen ACO model allows ACOs to assume higher levels of financial risk and reward than under the traditional Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) Tracks 1, 1+, 2, and 3 ACOs, and allows for first dollar shared savings but also first dollar shared losses. The following is an overview that summarizes key features of the Next Gen ACO model and includes a description of the application process and current timeline, who can apply to be a Next Gen ACO, the types of risk arrangements allowed, the payment mechanisms participants can choose from, and other unique features of this model. Additional details and resources are available on the CMS Next Gen ACO website. i Goal of the Next Gen ACO Model The goal of ACOs, generally, is to help allow physicians, hospitals, and other health care providers better coordinate care for Medicare patients. The Next Gen ACO model is to determine whether stronger financial incentives for ACOs, coupled with better patient care management and engagement can improve health outcomes and decrease Medicare costs. Joining a New Next Gen ACO There are currently 58 ACOs participating in the Next Gen ACO model for 2018. ii Physicians can contact one of these existing ACOs and inquire about joining the Next Gen ACO for the 2018 performance year and beyond. Eligibility of Providers/Suppliers Next Gen ACOs may be formed by Next Generation Participants that can be structured as: Physicians or other practitioners in group practice arrangements; Networks of individual practices of physicians or other practitioners; Hospitals employing physicians or other practitioners; Partnerships or joint venture arrangements between hospitals and physicians or other practitioners; Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs); Rural Health Clinics (RHCs); or Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs). 3 P a g e

Other Medicare-enrolled providers or suppliers may also participate in an ACO formed by one or more of the above entities, provided they meet the other requirements defined for Next Generation Participants. 1 Next Gen ACOs must serve a minimum of 10,000 Medicare beneficiaries or a minimum of 7,500 Medicare beneficiaries if the Next Gen ACO is deemed to be a Rural ACO. Additionally, Medicare-enrolled providers and suppliers can act as Preferred Providers by entering into an agreement with the Next Gen ACO. Whereas Next Generation Participants are the core providers/suppliers in the Next Gen ACO, Preferred Providers contribute to the goals of the ACO by extending and facilitating care relationships beyond the Next Gen ACO. iii Beneficiary Attribution and Alignment Under the Next Gen ACO model, beneficiaries are aligned prospectively, based on historical claims data. A voluntary alignment option is also available to beneficiaries, allowing them to elect that they be aligned with the Next Gen ACO for the subsequent performance year. Although beneficiaries are aligned prospectively, it is important to note that beneficiaries generally do not 1 In the 2018 Next Gen ACO RFA, a Next Generation Participant is defined as an individual or entity that: (1) is a Medicare-enrolled provider (as defined at 42 C.F.R. 400.202) or supplier (as defined at 42 C.F.R. 400.202); (2) is identified on the ACO s list of Next Generation Participants by name, National Provider Identifier (NPI), TIN, Legacy TIN (if applicable), and CMS Certification Number (CCN) (if applicable); (3) bills for items and services it furnishes to Medicare FFS beneficiaries under a Medicare billing number assigned to a TIN in accordance with applicable Medicare regulations; (4) is not a Preferred Provider; (5) is not a Prohibited Participant; and (6) pursuant to a written agreement with the ACO, has agreed to participate in the Model, to report quality data through the ACO, and to comply with care improvement objectives and Model quality performance standards. 4 P a g e

have a direct incentive to stick with the providers in the ACO and, even though they are aligned with the Next Gen ACO, they may elect to receive care from providers outside of the Next Gen ACO. Prospective Attribution Assigns beneficiaries based on historical claims data Allows patient and physician notification Assumes that most patients will use the same physicians in the future as they have in the past Advantage: quality and cost reports available on a timely basis Voluntary Beneficiary Alignment Beneficiaries are allowed to voluntarily align themselves with a Next Gen ACO for a subsequent performance year Requirements for a beneficiary to be assignment-eligible Had at least one paid claim for a Qualified Evaluation and Management (QEM) service during the alignment period for the given base- or performance-year Is covered under Part A in January of the base- or performance-year and in every month of the base- or performance-year in which the beneficiary is alive Has no months of coverage under only Part A Has no months of coverage under only Part B Has no months of coverage under a Medicare Advantage or other Medicare managed care plans Has no months in which Medicare was the secondary payer Is a resident of the United States Payment Mechanisms ACOs participating in the Next Gen ACO model will have the flexibility to choose their payment method for their shared savings/losses. It is important to note that the underlying risk arrangement (discussed below) will remain the same, but the participating organizations can select one of the following four different payment mechanisms. 5 P a g e

Normal FFS payments Normal FFS payment + perbeneficiary per-month (PBPM) Infrastructure payment recouped against shared savings or in addition to losses Population-based payments (PBP) which is a PBPM Providers/suppliers have FFS claims reduced and ACO receives a monthly payment equal to the FFS reduction percentage All-inclusive population-based payment (AIPBP) A capitated payment by which the ACO receives a PBPM and is responsible for paying claims for ACO providers For examples of how payments would be calculated under the different mechanisms, please refer to Appendix D here. iv Risk Arrangements Participating ACOs will be able to choose from two forms of risk arrangements Arrangements A or Arrangement B to determine the level of potential savings or losses. However, CMS will cap individual beneficiary expenditures at the 99 th percentile of expenditures and will cap aggregate savings or losses to up to 15% of the benchmark in both arrangements. This means that the Next Gen ACO can share savings up to the amount that is 15% of the benchmark and is responsible for losses up to the amount that is 15% of the benchmark. Additionally, each Next Gen ACO must have an ACO funding approach that demonstrates a credible plan for ensuring repayment to Medicare of the ACO s share of losses relative to the benchmark. v 6 P a g e

Note: in the Next Gen ACO model CMS makes a distinction between the risk arrangement and payment mechanism. The risk arrangement is used to determine shared savings/losses, but participants can select their payment method (discussed above). Benchmark Calculation Prior to the beginning of each performance year, CMS will develop a benchmark for each Next Gen ACO against which the ACO s performance is measured to assess whether the ACO generates savings or losses. The benchmark calculation for Next Gen ACOs is particularly unique in that it is calculated on a prospective basis. A Next Gen ACO s benchmark is calculated by using a one-year historic baseline trended forward by a projected regional trend. The benchmark calculation also includes a discount that incorporates quality and efficiency adjustments which reward both attainment and improvement. Determine the ACO s historic baseline expenditures Apply regional projected trend Risk adjust using the CMS HCC model Apply the discount, which is derived from one quality adjustment and two efficiency adjustments Next Gen ACO Benchmark Unlike MSSP Tracks 2 and 3 ACO models, the Next Gen ACO model does not utilize a minimum savings rate (MSR) or minimum loss rate (MLR). Instead, Next Gen ACOs can achieve first dollar savings if spending is below the benchmark, and are accountable for first dollar losses if spending is above the benchmark. Their specific sharing rate and loss rate depends on the risk arrangement they select. Quality Measures In terms of quality measures, the Next Gen ACO model follows the MSSP set of quality measures except for the electronic health record measure. Next Gen ACO physicians and other providers must report on a total of 33 quality measures, including the patient satisfaction measures through the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Survey for ACOs. Under the Next Gen ACO model, the quality performance standard initially begins as pay-for-reporting during an ACO s first performance year, and then transitions to pay-for-performance for certain measures in subsequent performance years. A list of the Next Gen ACO measures can be found in Appendix E of the Next Gen ACO RFA. vi It is important to note that the quality score is taken into account during the benchmark discount calculation, and a higher quality score would result in a smaller, more favorable discount of the 7 P a g e

benchmark, while a poorer quality score would result in a larger, less favorable discount of the benchmark. Benefit Enhancements and Waivers The model features three optional benefit enhancements. Waivers SNF 3-day Rule Waiver vii Telehealth Waiver viii Post-Discharge Home Visit Waiver ix Coordinated Care Reward x Next Gen Allows beneficiaries to be admitted directly to a SNF from their home, a physician's office, an observation status of the ER, or when they have been in the hospital for fewer than three days. SNF must have a quality rating of 3+ stars. Waiver of the requirement that beneficiaries be located in a rural area and at a specified type of originating site when telehealth services provided by providers/suppliers or preferred providers to aligned beneficiaries in specific facilities or at their residence. Waiver permits "incident to" claims for home visits to nonhomebound aligned beneficiaries by licensed clinicians under the general supervision of providers/suppliers or preferred providers, following discharge from an inpatient facility. Benefit limited to one visit in the first 10 days following discharge and one additional visit in the subsequent 20 days CMS will make a $25 payment as a Coordinated Care Reward when a beneficiary receives an Annual Wellness Visit from their Next Gen ACO doctor Next Gen ACOs and the Quality Payment Program Under the QPP, physicians and other eligible clinicians who are in a Next Gen ACO are considered to be participating in an Advanced APM. Physicians and other eligible clinicians 2 on the Participant List for Next Gen ACOs can receive one of three Advanced APM determinations for their participation. 2 For 2018, eligible clinicians are defined as physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, and certified nurse anesthetists. 8 P a g e

Qualifying Advanced APM Participant (QP) Eligible to receive a 5% incentive payment Exempt from MIPS Partially Qualifying Advanced APM Participant (PQ) Not eligible to receive a 5% incentive payment Exempt from MIPS (however, the APM Entity could elect to participate in MIPS using the MIPS APM scoring standard and be eligible to receive a positive payment adjustment) Neither a QP or PQ Subject to MIPS participation using the MIPS APM scoring standard While the QP and PQ determinations apply at the individual level, they are determined at the APM Entity level. In this case the APM Entity is the Next Gen ACO, and all physicians and other eligible clinicians on the Next Gen ACO s Participant List must collectively meet the thresholds for becoming a QP or PQ. Qualifying Advanced APM Participant (QP) Receive 25% of their Medicare Part B payments through the Advanced APM, OR See 20% of their Medicare Part B patients through the Advanced APM Partially Qualifying Advanced APM Participant (PQ) Receive 20% of their Medicare Part B payments through the Advanced APM, OR See 10% of their Medicare Part B patients through the Advanced APM Neither a QP or PQ Receive less than 20% of their Medicare Part B payments through the Advanced APM, AND See less than 10% of their Medicare Part B patients through the Advanced APM Unlike QPs, PQs would not be eligible to receive a 5% incentive payment for their participation, but they would be exempt from MIPS participation. However, the Next Gen ACO may elect to participate in MIPS using the MIPS APM scoring method. Under the MIPS APM scoring method option, all physicians and other eligible clinicians in the Next Gen ACO would be evaluated as a group in three of the four MIPS categories: quality would be 50% of the MIPS score, advancing care information would be 30% of the MIPS score, and improvement activities would be 20% of 9 P a g e

the MIPS score. The cost category is reweighted to 0% because physicians are already subject to cost performance assessment under the Next Gen ACO model. To learn more about the MIPS APM scoring methodology, please see PAI s MIPS APM Scoring Overview xi resource. Where can I go for more information? For additional information on the QPP requirements for Advanced APM participation please see the QPP Advanced APM Overview xii resource, available on PAI s website under the Advanced APM Pathway page. xiii Additional resources are available on the CMS Next Gen ACO website. xiv i https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/next-generation-aco-model/ ii https://data.cms.gov/special-programs-initiatives-speed-adoption-of-bes/next-generation-aco-models/tn2j-iqcf iii Source: 2018 Next Gen ACO RFA: https://innovation.cms.gov/files/x/nextgenaco-rfa2018.pdf. iv https://innovation.cms.gov/files/x/nextgenacorfa.pdf v Source: Next Gen ACO RFA: https://innovation.cms.gov/files/x/nextgenacorfa.pdf vi https://innovation.cms.gov/files/x/nextgenacorfa.pdf vii https://innovation.cms.gov/files/x/pioneeraco-snfwaiver.pdf viii https://innovation.cms.gov/files/x/nextgenaco-telehealthwaiver.pdf ix https://innovation.cms.gov/files/x/nextgenaco-pdhomevisitwaiver.pdf x https://innovation.cms.gov/files/x/nextgenaco-ccrfaq.pdf xi http://www.physiciansadvocacyinstitute.org/portals/0/assets/docs/advanced-apm-pathway/mips-apm-scoring- Overview.pdf xii http://www.physiciansadvocacyinstitute.org/portals/0/assets/docs/advanced-apm- Pathway/QPP%20Advanced%20APM%20Overview.pdf xiii http://www.physiciansadvocacyinstitute.org/macra-qpp-center/advanced-apm-pathway xiv https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/next-generation-aco-model/ 10 P a g e