CTAA Analysis of Transit Asset Management Proposed Rule

Similar documents
FTA TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT NPRM

Transit Asset Management (TAM) Final Rule - Small Systems Focus

Transit Asset Management Plan

CalACT Expo Transit Asset Management (TAM) Plan Workshop 49 CFR 625 April 24, 2017

48962 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

Re: Transit Asset Management; National Transit Database; Proposed Rule (Docket Number FTA )

Performance-Based Planning APTA Sustainability and Multimodal Planning Workshop August 9, Mark Kane, Community Planner

ALDOT TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN

Memphis Urban Area- Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Policy Board Meeting. August 23, 2018

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Transit Asset Management (TAM) Group TAM Plan for Tier II Subrecpients of 5311 Funds Nebraska Department of Transportation

Department of Transportation

FTA Rural and Tribal NTD Overview and Updates. December 12, 2018

Transit Asset Management Initial Performance Targets

California MAP-21 Transit Working Group: MAP-21 Questions for FTA

JULY 17, 2018 FINAL AGENDA SENIOR CITIZEN AND DISABLED RESIDENT TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT (NEXT SCHEDULED REPORT DECEMBER 2018)

Urban Transit Funding Formula Study

Birmingham-Jefferson County Transit Authority P.O. Box Birmingham, AL Phone: (205) Fax: (205)

Providers of Public Transportation Individual Targets

TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, May 21, 2018 University Park, Suite N. IH 35, Austin, Texas :00 p.m.

MODULE 1: FUNDING TRANSIT IN TEXAS MODULE 1 1

Department of Transportation

MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: April 12, 2017 MPO Executive Board: April 19, 2017

Transit Asset Management. Group Sponsored Plan Public Transportation Division. TxTx

Review of the Federal Transit Administration s Transit Economic Requirements Model. Contents

Texas Department of Transportation Page 1 of 42 Planning and Development of Transportation Projects

BINGHAMTON METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY CERTIFICATION NARRATIVE FY 2016

Rail Modernization Study REPORT TO CONGRESS. April Prepared by: Federal Transit Administration

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

Chapter VIII Financial Plan

Report of Independent Accountants on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures

Strategic Prioritization Office of Transportation Local Input Point Assignment Methodology

Appendix. G RTP Revenue Assumptions REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

FY2016 True Up Overview

Wednesday, January 31, 2018, (February Meeting) 10:00 a.m. Spokane Transit Southside Conference Room AGENDA

CAPITAL PROGRAM COMMITTEE AGENDA

THE. ATLANTA REGION S Transit Programs Of Projects

Adopts an Asset Management Policy and supersedes Resolution No. R

RIDOT The Ten Year Plan, Asset Management, and Innovation Moving Ahead in the 21 st Century

2017 Educational Series FUNDING

THE. ATLANTA REGION S Transit Programs Of Projects

INVESTMENT STRATEGIES

WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINANCIAL PLAN. Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER

Transportation Improvement Program Project Priority Process White Paper

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

DRAFT. Relationship of Asset Condition Rating to Transit System Performance. Prepared for. Transportation Research Board

Regional Transportation Plan 2040

Honolulu High-Capacity Transit Corridor Project Alternatives Analysis

House Bill 20 Implementation. House Select Committee on Transportation Planning Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 1:00 P.M. Capitol Extension E2.

Metropolitan Planning Organizations in North Carolina. Chris Lukasina NCAMPO

Tony Mento, P.E. January 2017

WICHITA FALLS DISTRICT

HUD Notice Soliciting Comments on ESG Interim Rule National Alliance to End Homelessness Summary of Notice June 25, 2015

Forecasting Asset Conditions with Decay Curves April 16, 2012 Keith Gates, PE Senior Analyst, Strategic Planning & Analysis

NOTICE OF COMMISSION MEETING AND AGENDA DES MOINES AREA REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY DART MULTIMODAL ROOM, 620 CHERRY STREET OCTOBER 2, :00 PM

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Tax Credit Program for Washington State

FTA PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES MANUAL NORTHWESTERN INDIANA REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION

Transit Operators Subcommittee February 15, 2019

Benefits of Long-Range Capital Planning

TRANSIT SYSTEM MAINTEANCE AND RENOVATION. GUIDEWAYS Caltrain

PENNSYLVANIA S 2017 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE

Table Of Contents Chapter 9: Vehicle, Facility and Other Equipment Inventory and Disposition

Federal Transit Administration s (FTA) Tribal Transit Program

8.0 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor

FISCAL YEAR 2017 OPERATING BUDGET

Public Transportation Advisory Committee. Meeting Handouts January 24, 2019

JACKSONVILLE URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM AMENDMENT 1 FISCAL YEAR 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS

LOCAL MAJOR BRIDGE PROGRAM

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

Portal North Bridge Project Hudson County, New Jersey Core Capacity Project Development (Rating Assigned February 2017)

FY 2008 TRANSIT PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS. Wichita Falls District TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

State of Good Repair Review

Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts Performance Audit Division

FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. REVISION #12 Amendment 6/3/16 DRAFT. July 2016

49 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Performance-based Planning and Programming. white paper

Lehigh Valley Transportation Study s Procedures for Transportation Improvement Program Revisions

ANNUAL TRANSIT PROVIDER MEETING FY 2017 SUBGRANTEE SESSION, SEPTEMBER 29, 2016

Proposed Revisions to the Volcker Rule s Implementing Rules Select Proposals and Open Questions

8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Proposed Changes to the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) September 13, 2018

TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN

UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO INTERNAL AUDIT DEPARTMENT DEVELOP BUDGETS

1 R E G I O N A L M O B I L I T Y P L A N

Chapter 6. Transportation Planning and Programming. Chapter 6

Regional Equity Analysis Of Current Funding (Highway STIP and CIP) Project Selection Advisory (PSA) Council

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Annual Listing of Federally Obligated Projects

Calgary 100 Years of Policies and Plans. By Chris Jacyk

MISSOURI HOUSING DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION. Section 3 Guidelines

RANSIT INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS

Contents. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Introduction S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205

Job Impacts of Spending on Public Transportation: An Update

*NEW REGULATION (THIS REGULATION REPLACES THE PRINCPLES AND CRITERIA FOR OFF-SITE LEVIES REGULATION) FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

ORDINANCE NO

Section 7. Financial Constraints

Appendix II: Inventory of Federal Programs

Transcription:

CTAA Analysis of Transit Asset Management Proposed Rule Issued: Sept. 30, 2015 Comments Due: Nov. 30, 2015 Summary: The Federal Transit Administration is proposing a new rule to establish a National Transit Asset Management (TAM) system to monitor and manage public transportation capital assets to achieve and maintain a state of good repair, improve safety and increase reliability and performance. Executive Summary FTA acknowledges the significant capital shortfall in the transit industry (citing a backlog of $85.6 billion) but also assumes no meaningful reduction in the backlog given existing fiscal contraints. Because there will remain not enough capital spending, FTA believes a systematic approach is needed to ensure that existing funding resources are strategically managed. In these financially constrained times, transit agencies will need to be more strategic in the use of all available funds. The various components of the National TAM System would work together to ensure that state of good repair becomes and remains a top priority for transit providers, states and MPOs. Transit Asset Management Plans FTA proposes a comprehensive National TAM System that would be comprised of the following five pillars: 1. The definition of state of good repair; 2. A requirement that recipients and subrecipients develop TAM plans; 3. State of good repair performance measures and a requirement that recipients and subrecipients set performance targets based on the measures; 4. Annual reporting requirements for recipients and subrecipients; and 5. Technical assistance from FTA. FTA splits the transit industry into two groups for the purposes of the TAM plans. Tier I systems are those that operate greater than 100 buses and/or fixed rail guideway operations. Tier 2 systems operate fewer than 100 buses and no fixed rail guideway. The establishment of these tiers is noteworthy as FTA has previously

used traditional geographic- and funding program-based distinctions in much of its rulemaking (rural, urban or 5307, 5311). Each Tier 1 provider must develop and carry out its own TAM plan. Tier 2 providers have the option of either participating in a group plan developed by a state or direct recipient or developing their own plan. The TAM plans should be coordinated, to the extent practicable, with states and MPOs and each transit provider s accountable executive is ultimately responsible for ensuring that the TAM plan is done. A TAM plan must include the following nine elements: 1. An inventory of capital assets sufficient to generate accurate, comprehensive data on the number and types of capital assets that would be identified in a transit provider s program of capital projects; 2. A condition assessment of the capital assets that must generate information in a level of detail sufficient to monitor and predict the performance of each capital asset identified in the inventory; 3. A list of the transit provider s analytical processes or decision-support tools that: estimate capital investment needs over time and assist capital asset investment prioritization; 4. A project-based prioritization of investments, including those projects for which funding will be sought under the Section 5337 State of Good Repair program; [Tier 2 and/or rural public transit agencies that elect to develop their own TAM plan or states that sponsor a plan are exempt from the following five elements] 5. A transit asset management and state of good repair policy; 6. A strategy for the implementation of the TAM plan; 7. A description of the annual key transit asset management activities spanning the time horizon of the TAM plan; 8. A specification of the resources, including personnel, needed to develop and implement the TAM plan; and 9. An outline of how the TAM plan and related business practices will be monitored, evaluated and updated, as needed, to ensure the continuous improvement of transit asset management practices. A state must develop a group TAM plan for all of its Tier 2 provider subrecipients as well as its rural formula providers that own, operate or manage capital assets used in the provision of public transportation. A Native American tribe may choose to participate in a state-sponsored TAM plan, or develop its own.

A state or direct recipient in NOT required to develop a group TAM plan if each of its eligible group TAM plan participants notifies the state or direct recipient that it is opting out of the group because it is either developing its own TAM plan or will participate in another state or direct recipients group TAM plan. Group TAM plan participants may participate in only one group TAM plan. The accountable executive of each transit provider is ultimately responsible for carrying out the transit asset management practices necessary to implement a group TAM plan for that provider. The same accountable executive must notify within a reasonable timeframe (set by the state) must provide a group TAM plan sponsor of a decision to opt-out of such a plan. Group TAM plan participants must provide all information necessary and relevant to the development of such a plan, including asset inventories, condition assessments, funding sources and investment priorities. Group TAM plans must include the following: 1. Coordinate with the accountable executive of each group participant in the development of a group TAM plan; 2. A group TAM plan must identify each participant; 3. The group TAM plan sponsor (state) much make the group TAM plan available to all participants in a format that is easily accessible. Each TAM plan must cover a horizon period of at least four years. TAM plans may be updated at any time during the horizon period and should be updated whenever there is a significant change to the asset inventory, condition assessments or investment prioritization. A TAM plan must be updated in its entirety at least once every four years and should coincide with the cycle for the relevant TIP and STIP. An initial TAM plan must be completed no later than two years after the effective date of the TAM rule. Prior to this deadline, both an individual and group TAM may submit a written request to FTA to extend its implementation deadline. FTA will grant these extensions at its own discretion, provided that a TAM group demonstrate a good faith effort to complete its initial TAM plan by the deadline. Investment Prioritization A TAM plan must include investment prioritization that identifies projects to improve or maintain the state of good repair of capital assets over the horizon period of the plan. Projects to improve or maintain the state of good repair must be ranked in order of priority and the year in which they are anticipated to be carried out. These rankings must be established based on transit asset management policies and strategies identified in the TAM plan. The investment prioritization must give due consideration to those projects for state of good repair that pose an identifiable unacceptable safety risk as well as an estimate of funding levels and funding

sources that are reasonably expected to be available in each fiscal year during the TAM plan horizon period. Performance Management To determine whether a capital asset is in a condition sufficient to enable the asset to operate at a full level of performance, the following standards apply to equipment, facilities, rolling stock and infrastructure: 1. The capital asset is able to perform its designed function; 2. The use of the asset in its current condition does not pose a known, unacceptable safety risk; and 3. The life-cycle investment needs of the asset have been met or recovered, including all scheduled maintenance, rehabilitation and replacements. Performance Measures for Capital Assets Non-revenue service vehicles: the performance measure for non-revenue, support service and maintenance vehicles is the percentage of vehicles that have met or exceeded their useful life benchmark. Rolling stock: The performance measure for rolling stock is the percentage of revenue vehicles within a particular asset class that have either met or exceeded their useful life benchmark (providers can either use the useful life benchmarks established by FTA or one developed locally that takes into account local conditions and usage that is approved by FTA). Facilities: The performance measure for facilities is the percentage of facilities within an asset class rated below condition 3 on the TERM scale. Setting Performance Targets for Capital Assets Within three months after the effective date of this rule, a transit provider or group TAM plan must set state of good repair performance targets for the following fiscal year for each asset class included in its TAM plan. This target setting must take place each year for the following fiscal year, for each asset class. These performance targets must be based on realistic expectations and based on the most recent data available and the financial resources expected to be available during the TAM plan horizon period. Setting the performance targets will be the responsibility of the accountable executive for individual TAM plans. In group TAM plans, the state must set one unified state of good repair performance target for each asset class reflected in the group TAM plan. Reporting and Recordkeeping

Each transit provider or group TAM plan sponsor (state) must maintain records and documents that support and set forth in full, its TAM plan. Any supporting records or documents must be made available. Each transit provider must submit an annual data report to FTA s NTD which reflects the state of good repair performance targets for the following year and a current assessment of the condition of the transit provider s public transportation system. Systems must also submit an annual narrative report to the NTD which provides a description of any change in the condition of the transit provider s transit system from the previous year and describes the progress made during the year to meet the state of good repair performance targets set in the previous year. A group TAM plan sponsor (state) must submit one consolidated annual data and one consolidated annual narrative, respectively, to the NTD on behalf of its group TAM plan participants.