Rating Criteria for Sugar Industry. February 2018

Similar documents
Rating criteria for the mining industry. February 2018

Ratings. Sample Report. Abc Limited. June 2017

Rating criteria for upstream oil & gas sector. February 2018

Rating Criteria for Power Distribution Utilities. February 2018

Rating criteria for the construction industry. February 2018

CRISIL s criteria for grading real estate developers

Rating criteria for securities firms. July 2017

CRISIL Criteria for Rating Hybrid Instruments Issued by NBFCs/HFCs. December 2016

In a sweet spot. Firm prices, deleveraging to improve the credit profiles of sugar companies. May 2017

The infrastructure sector: unique rating drivers. February 2018

Rating criteria for toll road projects. February 2018

CRISIL s rating process. June 2017

CRISIL s bond fund credit quality ratings criteria. February 2018

CRISIL s criteria for consolidation. December 2016

Ratings. REIT and InvIT. A primer. August 2016

CRISIL s criteria for rating Education institutions. January 2017

CRISIL s bank loan ratings process, scale and default recognition. August 2017

CRISIL s ratings and rating scales June 2017

CRISIL Composite Bond Fund Index

Criteria for Rating power transmission projects. October 2016

CRISIL revises rating scale for micro and small enterprises

CRISIL s rating methodology for collateralised debt obligations (CDO) September 2018

CRISIL Real Estate Star Ratings (CREST) FAQs

CRISIL s criteria for rating instruments backed by guarantees

Ind AS impact. Financial statements to undergo changes, but no major rating or criteria changes foreseen since fundamentals remain the same

Securitisation Market Overview Securitisation market hits a trillion, propelled by PTCs

CRISIL s approach to financial ratios. December 2017

CRISIL Unit Linked Insurance Plan (ULIP) Ranking. Methodology document

Rating criteria for state governments. May 2018

CRISIL Indices. Summary of indices relevant for mutual fund categories specified by SEBI

Changes in Hybrid Segment of Indices. CRISIL Funds and Fixed Income Research

Ofira. Project profile. Grading Assigned: Surat 7 Star out of 7 Star (Assigned in September 2017) Valid till September 25, Location of project

Rating criteria for banks and financial institutions. November 2017

CRISIL Mutual Fund Ranking Methodology

Grading Assigned: Mumbai 5 Star out of 7 Star (Assigned in September 2017) Vartak Nagar, Thane, Mumbai. Total 98,237 sq. ft.

Planet SKS. Project profile

Complying with CECL. We assess five ways to implement the new regulations. September 2017

CRISIL - AMFI Balance Fund Performance Index. Factsheet March 2018

GDP to grow at 7% in fiscal CRISIL Outlook September 2017

CRISIL - AMFI ELSS Fund Performance Index. Factsheet September 2017

Criteria for rating wind power projects

CRISIL - AMFI Income Fund Performance Index. Factsheet March 2018

CRISIL - AMFI GILT Fund Performance Index. Factsheet December 2017

CRISIL - AMFI Short Term Debt Fund Performance Index. Factsheet March 2018

CRISIL - AMFI Hybrid Fund Performance Index. Factsheet September 2017

Labour pain. Chartbook. Research

CRISIL - AMFI Small & Midcap Fund Performance Index. Factsheet March 2018

Evaluating risks in securitisation transactions: A primer. September 2018

Built up area: LIG ( sq.ft.); MIG ( sq.ft.); HIG ( sq.ft.)

CRISIL - AMFI Liquid Fund Performance Index. Factsheet December 2017

Seafood exports to stay robust, US shrimp export realisations to drop 10% April 2018

CRISIL s criteria for rating annuity road projects. June 2018

CRISIL s criteria for rating annuity road projects. January 2017

Swastik Universal. Project Profile. Existing Rating: Surat 5 Star. November No. of villas/blocks. No. of units Offices: 278, corporate house: 5

CRISIL - AMFI Diversified Equity Fund Performance Index. Factsheet September 2017

10,11,497 square feet (sq ft; developer s share is 8,26,133 sq ft)

Residential : 2,71,235 square feet Commercial : 1,940 square feet

CRISIL - AMFI Money Market Fund Performance Index. Factsheet March 2018

CRISIL Unit Linked Insurance Plan Ranking. As on October 2017

Oranje Castle. Project profile. Grading Assigned: Lucknow 4 Star out of 7 Star (Assigned in January 2018) Valid till January 23, 2019

CRISIL - AMFI Equity Fund Performance Index. Factsheet March 2018

Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Limited Ratings upgraded to 'CRISIL AA-/Stable/CRISIL A1+', removed from 'Watch Developing'

Sentiment sustains. CriSidEx readings, Jan-Mar and Apr-Jun April 2018 Volume 2

Criteria for notching down standalone ratings of companies based on support extended to parent

CRISIL s rating methodology for RMBS transactions. September 2018

Managed by ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Ltd.

Residential market unlikely to look up soon

CRISIL Default Study. Default and rating transitions in February 2017

Fund Insights. Liquid funds - an alternative to savings bank deposits. Satish Prabhu Senior Manager - CRISIL FundServices

Criteria for rating solar power projects

Balrampur Chini Mills Limited. Q4 & FY2018 Results Presentation May 19, 2018

August CRISIL Insight. Expected Loss Based Provisioning

Luis Henrique. Guimarães CEO

Corporate Office. C- 11, Connaught Place, New Delhi , India. Phone: Fax:

CRISIL s rating methodology for ABS transactions

Insights. CRISIL'S CRITERIA FOR CORPORATE SECTOR HYBRIDS (Including perpetual securities) EQUITY H BRIDS Y. May 2011

Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited

STATEMENT OF AUDITED FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE QUARTER AND YEAR ENDED 31st MARCH, 2014

FINANCING SOLUTIONS FOR AGRICULTURE

Bunge Reports Third Quarter 2017 Results

Dhampur Sugar Mills Limited. Q1 FY19 Earnings Conference Call - 08 th August 2018

THE HOW AND WHY OF INVESTING IN AGRICULTURE

CRISIL Q2 FY18 Results Outlook

IFCI Limited New Delhi. Sugar Development Fund. Dated: 16/08/2018

Risk spectrum of financial assets held by banks and NBFCs

For Immediate Release May 31 st, 2013

The County Phase 1A (3 Blocks) Rating assigned: Kolkata 4 Star

CRISIL Independent Equity Research & IPO Grading

SIMBHAOLI SUGARS LIMITED. Investor update. On financial results. For the period ended December 31, 2012

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF SELECTED PRIVATE SECTOR SUGAR COMPANIES IN TAMIL NADU AN EVALUATION.

CARE s Rating Methodology - Wholesale Trading

WILMAR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (Incorporated in the Republic of Singapore) (Company Registration No Z) ACQUISITION OF SUCROGEN LIMITED

CREDIT RATING REPORT. Gruh Finance Limited. September 2017

COMMON PRE-SEEN (KC1 TO KC4)

Sugar Price Risk: A Tale of Two Mills

Fourth Quarter 2011 Earnings Conference Call. 23 November 2011

UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER ENDED 31 MARCH 2013

Indonesia s Economic Outlook, Economic Challenges & Policy Responses

OTHER COMMODITIES Oct 2016

The Indian Sugar Industry Presented to: Honorable Finance Minister, Government of India

Transcription:

Rating Criteria for Sugar Industry February 2018

Criteria contacts Pawan Agrawal Chief Analytical Officer CRISIL Ratings Email: pawan.agrawal@crisil.com Sameer Charania Director Rating Criteria and Product Development Email: sameer.charania@crisil.com Somasekhar Vemuri Senior Director Rating Criteria and Product Development Email: somasekhar.vemuri@crisil.com Manish Kumar Gupta Director - CRISIL Ratings Email: manish.gupta@crisil.com In case of any feedback or queries, you may write to us at Criteria.feedback@crisil.com 2

Executive Summary Sugar is the most important agriculture-based industry in India after textiles. India is the largest producer, after Brazil, and the largest consumer of sugar. Sugar production depends on sugarcane output, which depends on rainfall. Moreover, sugarcane prices are regulated by the government while sugar prices are market-driven. Also, the industry is cyclical and is susceptible to price fluctuations and trade regulations. While cane production is concentrated between September and April, demand for sugar lasts through the year. CRISIL's approach to rating sugar companies involves an evaluation of their financial position and cash flow in the context of their ability to withstand cyclical downturns. In CRISIL's experience, companies with strong businesses and operational efficiency, and low interest cost, have consistently withstood sugar price downturns. Scope While the broader criteria for manufacturing companies 1 applies to all sugar companies, this article 2 details the industry-specific factors impacting the credit risk profiles of sugar producers. Business Risk Government policies The sugar industry is regulated extensively by the government. Hence, CRISIL believes a sugar company's credit risk profile is significantly vulnerable to government policies. These policies influence cost through cane pricing and cane availability through the command area concept. The government also controls import/export of sugar through imposition duty. Consequently, sugar companies do not have much control over the quantity, quality, or cost of sugarcane they procure, or the quantity of sugar they sell. These factors significantly affect the economics of their operations. Market position In the highly fragmented sugar industry, size is an important determinant of a company s market position. Large companies typically have greater ability to withstand external shocks, easier access to capital markets, and greater bargaining power, and consequently, tend to have strong credit risk profile. However, the benefit of size may be nullified by a weak capital structure or poor cost position. 1 The detailed criteria is present on the CRISIL website under the Criteria and Methodology section Rating Criteria for Manufacturing and Services Sector Companies and CRISIL s Approach to Financial Ratios. 2 For accessing the previous published document on Rating Criteria for Sugar Industry, kindly follow below mentioned link: https://www.crisil.com/content/dam/crisil/criteria_methodology/consumer-staples/archive/crisil-ratings-crieria-sugarindustry_2007.pdf 3

Other factors affecting market position Location Freight is an important cost element. Companies with factories close to sugar-deficit regions command a better price and save on freight costs. Factories close to high-yielding sugarcane farms are also in a better position. Similarly, the longer crushing season in southern India enables better utilisation of fixed assets. Proximity to ports is also a critical factor. Easy accessibility to ports enables import of raw sugar for processing during cyclical upturns, when sugarcane availability is expected to be lower. It also provides companies with greater flexibility to export during periods of low domestic prices. Customer profile Traditionally, sugar sales have been routed through dealers. Relationships with institutional customers may be viewed favourably, partly due to the benefits of regular liquidation of inventory outside the government's release mechanism. Relationship with farmers Variability in monsoon and changing crop patterns impact cane output and consequently sugar production. This makes healthy relationship with farmers a crucial requirement for sugar companies, to ensure availability of cane. Hence, investments in sugarcane development activity and timely payments for sugarcane are considered prerequisites for timely and adequate availability of cane. Operating efficiency With prices of sugarcane being regulated through fair and remunerative price (FRP) mechanism, operating efficiency (determined by recovery rate) and processing cost will determine ability to withstand downturns. CRISIL believes larger plants are better placed, as their conversion cost will be low. Level of Integration Optimal utilisation of by-products such as molasses (used to produce ethanol) and bagasse (used to generate power), is another key differentiating factor. It will enable companies to capture value across the production chain. Integrated sugar mills with biomass power plant are more likely to be successful. An integrated sugar company functions on a de-risked model, which results in higher revenue and stable profitability. Working capital management While cane production is concentrated between September and April, demand for sugar lasts through the year. Therefore, sugar producers have to efficiently manage their seasonal working capital requirements amidst fluctuating prices, a crucial credit differentiator. 4

Financial risk For the analysis of the financial risk of a sugar company, CRISIL follows the standard criteria used for all manufacturing companies. This criterion is presented in detail in our publications, 'Rating Criteria for Manufacturing and Services Sector Companies' and 'CRISIL's Approach to Financial Ratios'. Management risk For analysing the management risk of sugar manufacturers, CRISIL follows the standard criteria used for all manufacturing companies. This criteria is presented in detail in our publication, Rating Criteria for Manufacturing and Services Sector Companies. Conclusion Thus, in CRISIL's opinion, the key success factors for sugar companies include: Scale of operations, recovery rate 3 Forward integration into power and distillery operations Location of plant and relationship with farmers Diversity in client base and geography 3 Recovery rate is defined as the amount of sugar produced per unit of sugarcane. 5

About CRISIL Limited CRISIL is an agile and innovative, global analytics company driven by its mission of making markets function better. We are India s foremost provider of ratings, data, research, analytics and solutions. A strong track record of growth, culture of innovation and global footprint sets us apart. We have delivered independent opinions, actionable insights, and efficient solutions to over 100,000 customers. We are majority owned by S&P Global Inc., a leading provider of transparent and independent ratings, benchmarks, analytics and data to the capital and commodity markets worldwide. About CRISIL Ratings CRISIL Ratings is part of CRISIL Limited ( CRISIL ). We pioneered the concept of credit rating in India in 1987. CRISIL is registered in India as a credit rating agency with the Securities and Exchange Board of India ( SEBI ). With a tradition of independence, analytical rigour and innovation, CRISIL sets the standards in the credit rating business. We rate the entire range of debt instruments, such as, bank loans, certificates of deposit, commercial paper, non-convertible / convertible / partially convertible bonds and debentures, perpetual bonds, bank hybrid capital instruments, asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, partial guarantees and other structured debt instruments. We have rated over 24,500 large and mid-scale corporates and financial institutions. CRISIL has also instituted several innovations in India in the rating business, including rating municipal bonds, partially guaranteed instruments and microfinance institutions. We also pioneered a globally unique rating service for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) and significantly extended the accessibility to rating services to a wider market. Over 1,10,000 MSMEs have been rated by us. CRISIL Privacy Notice CRISIL respects your privacy. We use your contact information, such as your name, address, and email id, to fulfil your request and service your account and to provide you with additional information from CRISIL and other parts of S&P Global Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company ) you may find of interest. For further information, or to let us know your preferences with respect to receiving marketing materials, please visit www.crisil.com/privacy. You can view the Company s Customer Privacy at https://www.spglobal.com/privacy Last updated: April 2016 Argentina China Hong Kong India Poland Singapore UK USA CRISIL Limited: CRISIL House, Central Avenue, Hiranandani Business Park, Powai, Mumbai 400076. India Phone: + 91 22 3342 3000 Fax: + 91 22 3342 3001 www.crisil.com