Update on the EU Unitary Patent System. EU-Japan Centre, Tokyo 28 September 2017

Similar documents
The unitary. Screening process Explanatory meeting with Serbia 25 September Unit D2: Industrial Property

The Unitary Patent Package where are we now?

The Most Innovative Law Firm in Europe. How to re-evaluate your patent strategies? By Asawari Churi and Adrian Murray

Life Sciences. Key issues for senior life sciences executives

IP Landscape in Europe - How Brexit and the Unified Patent Will Influence Patenting Strategies, Litigation and Ultimately the Value of IP Portfolios

Patenttiuudistus etenee - Yritysten näkemyksiä tuomioistuimesta mitä muutoksia ja toimenpiteitä edessä?

Unitary Patent Package

Unitary Patent Package Conference 2017

The impact of Brexit on Intellectual Property. August 2016

IP rights post-brexit

The PATLIB network in Europe An overview of the existing practice. Directorate for International Co-operation

NOTE. for the Interparliamentary Meeting of the Committee on Budgets

The Unitary Patent Outstanding Legal Issues and Challenges

The Most Innovative Law Firm in Europe. Getting the end-game right SPCs and unitary patents in Europe. By Charlotte Weekes

Unitary Patent as an object of property in the context of the UPC and employee inventions

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

Luxembourg. Information on the filing of Patents, Designs and. Trademarks in Luxembourg COMANAS CORP. IP Management Service Group

IP and the Consequences of Brexit

Patents in Europe 2018/2019. Helping business compete in the global economy. The need-to-know facts about patent term extensions in Europe

THE 2015 EU JUSTICE SCOREBOARD

EU JOINT TRANSFER PRICING FORUM

The UPC What you need to know

Protect. Inform. The Unified Patent Court. Survey findings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co s Intellectual Property team. Prepare

BREAKING THE BARRIER MADRID PROTOCOL IN MOTION

CANADA EUROPEAN UNION

The EFTA Statistical Office: EEA - the figures and their use

Brexit: what might change Intellectual Property

Social Protection and Social Inclusion in Europe Key facts and figures

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP ( TPP ) AND THE CANADA EU ECONOMIC AND FREE TRADE AGREEMENT ( CETA ): AN UPDATE AND COMPARISON

Official Journal of the European Union L 57/5

Deal or No deal: IP. IP if there is a deal

ECN Plus facilitating a coherent enforcement in Europe?

Single Market Scoreboard

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document

PROGRESS TOWARDS THE LISBON OBJECTIVES 2010 IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Overview of Eurofound surveys

European Parliament presented at REHVA supporters seminar Feb 12, 2009 by Ms Sirpa Pietikäinen MEP

After Article 50: The Ramifications of. After Article 50: The Ramifications of Brexit October 2016

EU-28 RECOVERED PAPER STATISTICS. Mr. Giampiero MAGNAGHI On behalf of EuRIC

Reshaping the governance of Europe s capital markets: Is enforcement the weakest link?

October 2010 Euro area unemployment rate at 10.1% EU27 at 9.6%

MULTILATERAL INSTRUMENT

Report Penalties and measures imposed under the UCITS Directive in 2016 and 2017

Relevant reporting requirements in each EEA States will also have to be checked.

KIRKLAND ALERT. Hard choices: Restructuring and insolvency dealmakers face uncertainty ahead of possible Hard Brexit

DATA SET ON INVESTMENT FUNDS (IVF) Naming Conventions

A. INTRODUCTION AND FINANCING OF THE GENERAL BUDGET. EXPENDITURE Description Budget Budget Change (%)

OECD Report Shows Tax Burdens Falling in Many OECD Countries

Energy Services Market in the EU: NEEAP and EED Implementation Paolo Bertoldi and Benigna Kiss

January 2010 Euro area unemployment rate at 9.9% EU27 at 9.5%

- Funding Instruments in the Region - Covered Bonds

PRIORITY RULES ON COMPENSATION FOR NUCLEAR DAMAGE IN NATIONAL LEGISLATIONS

2017 Figures summary 1

Investment in Germany and the EU

PATSTRAT. Error! Unknown document property name. EN

PROGRESS TOWARDS THE LISBON OBJECTIVES 2010 IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING

DANSKE HAVNE OG BREXIT

in focus Statistics Contents Labour Mar k et Lat est Tr ends 1st quar t er 2006 dat a Em ploym ent r at e in t he EU: t r end st ill up

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE FIELD OF CONFISCATION AND RECOVERY OF CRIMINAL ASSETS: TOOLS AND INSTRUMENTS

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Annual Review of Member States' Annual Activity Reports on Export Credits in the sense of Regulation (EU) 1233/2011

guidlines for open office export to pdf with letterhead

Statistics: Fair taxation of the digital economy

What Brexit would mean for UK and global share plans

Burden of Taxation: International Comparisons

14349/16 MP/SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B

Pharmaceutical policies in response to the financial i crisis i - results from policy monitoring in the EU

November 5, Very preliminary work in progress

Effect of Brexit on IP protection

European Commission. Statistical Annex of Alert Mechanism Report 2017

Taylor & Francis Open Access Survey Open Access Mandates

Growth, competitiveness and jobs: priorities for the European Semester 2013 Presentation of J.M. Barroso,

Taxation trends in the European Union EU27 tax ratio at 39.8% of GDP in 2007 Steady decline in top personal and corporate income tax rates since 2000

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE FIELD OF CONFISCATION AND RECOVERY OF CRIMINAL ASSETS: TOOLS AND INSTRUMENTS

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR RESEARCH & INNOVATION

PROVISIONAL DRAFT. Information Note from the Commission. on progress in implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

EU BUDGET AND NATIONAL BUDGETS

EUROPEAN UNION. Strasbourg, 16 April 2014 (OR. en) 2013/0439 (COD) LEX 1500 PE-CONS 57/1/14 REV 1 STAT 8 FIN 172 CODEC 632

Statistics on APAs in the EU at the End of 2016

The impact of Brexit on intellectual property

Corporate taxes and intellectual property

FIRST REPORT COSTS AND PAST PERFORMANCE

The Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia takes part in some of the work of the OECD (agreement of 28th October 1961).

Classic Plus Income Protection Plan

C 3 INNOVATION BEHAVIOUR IN THE GERMAN PRIVATE SECTOR

PATSTRAT. Error! Unknown document property name. EN

Approach to Employment Injury (EI) compensation benefits in the EU and OECD

Live Long and Prosper? Demographic Change and Europe s Pensions Crisis. Dr. Jochen Pimpertz Brussels, 10 November 2015

European Trends in SRI: 2010 European HNWI & SRI Studies

BRIEFING ON THE FUND FOR EUROPEAN AID FOR THE MOST DEPRIVED ( FEAD )

Library statistical spotlight

Lowest implicit tax rates on labour in Malta, on consumption in Spain and on capital in Lithuania

Annual revision of national contributions to the EU budget

May 2009 Euro area external trade surplus 1.9 bn euro 6.8 bn euro deficit for EU27

Miroljub Labus. Budget. Introduction into Economic System of the EU. Faculty of Law, Belgrade

GIBRALTAR AND TAXATION

Introduction 283,602,000,000 ( 284 billion ) 71 billion 10.71%

Fiscal rules in Lithuania

State aid: Overview of national rescue measures and deposit guarantee schemes

Transcription:

Update on the EU Unitary Patent System EU-Japan Centre, Tokyo 28 September 2017

Start of the new system January 1st, 2014 End of 2015 Middle of 2016 December 2017? Early 2015 Early 2016 Spring 2017 First quarter 2018 2

Overview on the Unitary Patent System 3

in force since January 20, 2013 Overview on the Unitary Patent System The European Patent with unitary effect (UP Unitary Patent) The Unified Patent Court (UPC) Regulation on the Unitary Patent No. 1257/2012 (UPR) Regulation on the translation arrangements for the Unitary Patent No. 1260/2012 (UPTR) Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (UPCA) Protocol to the UPCA on provisional application not in force new system starts, when UPCA enters into force 4

Structure of the UPC from: European Patent Office, www.epo.org Central Division in Paris, London, Munich Regional Divisions in Sweden (Nordic-Baltic), Greece (South-East) Local Divisions i.a. in Austria, Belgium, France, Germany (4), Italy, Netherlands, UK, 5

Structure of the UPC from: Pinsent Masons LLP, eupatentsmatter.com 6

Provisional Application of UPCA Background: Smooth transition into operational phase of UPC Ensure proper functioning of UPC Step by step introduction: Establishment of UPC as an organization Constitution of the UPC's formal governing bodies Interviews with candidate judges, confirmation of appointments Start of Registry Sunrise period: Opt out of EP from UPC system Minimum of 3 months 7

Current Status of the UPC 8

Current Status of the UPC Ratification of UPCA Prerequisite: ratification by min. 13 MS including Big 3 (UK, France, Germany) Status: ratification by 14 MS at the end of August 2017 But: UK missing ( Brexit ) Germany missing (constitutional complaint) Ratification of Protocol on provisional application Prerequisite: ratification by min. 13 MS including Big 3 (UK, France, Germany) Status: ratification by 10 MS at the end of August 2017 UK ratified in July 2017 But: Germany missing (constitutional complaint) 2 other MS missing will be done soon (e.g. Malta and Bulgaria) 9

Current Status of the UPC Situation in the UK Ratification will be continued at the earliest opportunity this year after parliamentary summer break Final step of UK s ratification probably in late autumn 2017 New political discussion: Will UK remain in UPC system post-brexit? Situation in Germany Ratification passed the Parliament in early March 2017 Constitutional complaint, filed by German attorney, end of March 2017 German Federal Constitutional Court takes its time to look into the grounds: Execution of UPC ratification on hold since June 2017 Court may submit certain legal points to ECJ (consistency with EU law?) 10

Preparation for the new system 11

Unitary Patent Guide 1st official guide published by EPO in August 2017 Available on EPO website under www.epo.org Law & practice Unitary patent Includes information on prosecution, maintenance, fees, transfers, No information on opt out: relates only to classic European patents 12

Basic Considerations To be or not to be part of the Unitary Patent system? Be prepared: Granted EPs, pending EP applications, current new inventions, imminent patent disputes have to be included in strategic considerations now. Existing European Patents are automatically part of the UPC system: Opt out? (sunrise period) Parallel national IP rights? National patents Utility models, e.g. as a divisional application Consider clear provisions in co-ownership and/or license agreements 13

Characteristics of the Unitary Patent Pro: Effective territorial coverage Uniform enforcement Reduced administrative expense Contra: Not all EU Member States are part of the system different generations of UP, depending on ratification status New and unknown court system Risk of unitary invalidation Cost aspects: Potentially higher annual costs at the end of patent lifetime Additional costs for validation of classic European Patent where UP system does not exist (ES, PL, CH, TR, ) 14

Costs of the Unitary Patent Year Unitary Patent DE and FR DE, FR, UK (in EUR) 3 105 140 106 142 106 142 3 5 315 600 126 374 210 458 5 8 815 2.520 370 1.218 526 1.698 8 Year 10 1.175 4.685 560 2.238 864 3.102 10 12 1.775 7.920 910 3.868 1.162 5.212 12 14 2.455 12.480 1.290 6.248 1.638 8.240 14 16 3.240 18.550 1.720 9.458 2.212 12.362 16 18 4.055 26.245 2.210 13.628 2.812 17.696 18 20 4.855 35.555 2.700 18.778 3.420 24.238 20 15

Considerations on Opt Out Only for classic EP (bundle patents) in all designated/validated MS Transitional period for 7 (+ up to 7) years, Art. 83 UPCA Background of opt out: Unitary Patent UPC European Patent UPC + national courts EP: Both UPC and national courts are competent at the same time Opt out of the competence of the UPC (until end of patent lifetime) Only for entire territory Withdrawal of opt out (~ opt in ) also possible after transitional period 16

Considerations on Opt Out Pro No opt out fee No invalidation of all national parts of the EP by one court decision Jurisdiction stays with familiar national courts Lower procedural costs if enforcement of EP in 1 jurisdiction only (depending on jurisdiction) Contra Risk: No opt in possible after start of a national legal proceeding (by third party) Higher procedural costs if enforcement of EP in >1 jurisdictions Higher legal uncertainty in case of varying decisions in different jurisdictions Chance for quicker final decisions at UPC (probably 2.5 years until 2nd instance decision, including infringement and validity) 17

Thank you very much for your attention! 18

Questions? Please contact me Preu Bohlig & Partner Dusseldorf office Dr. Christian Kau email: cka@preubohlig.de Couvenstrasse 4 Tel: +49 211 59 89 16 0 Fax: +49 211 59 89 16 22 D-40211 Dusseldorf www.preubohlig.de 19