Before the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission of the State of South Dakota

Similar documents
Before the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission of the State of South Dakota

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Public Service Company of Colorado ) Docket No.

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

Cost Allocation Manual

BEFORE THE MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 100 Washington Square, Suite 1700 Minneapolis MN

Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. State of Minnesota

Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP Exhibit No. TPC-0079

BrackHH&PD.er. December 17,2012

STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *

March 19, MidAmerican Central California Transco, LLC Docket No. ER

EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES. Mr. Fredric Stoffel

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF LAURENCE M. BROCK

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WYOMING ) ) ) ) PREFILED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS OF JONI JOHNSON-POWE INDEX QUALIFICATIONS...

1

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Jeffrey L.

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NEW ENGLAND POWER COMPANY DE 16-

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Docket No. DE DIRECT TESTIMONY

2015 General Rate Case

RR9 - Page 356 of 510

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JEFFREY C.

STATEMENT OF POLICY REGARDING CORPORATE SECURITIES DEFINITIONS Adopted April 27, 1997; Amended September 28, 1999, March 31, 2008 and May 6, 2018

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION CODE OF CONDUCT. Filed with the Secretary of State on

RR1 - Page 181 of 518

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

RHODE ISLAND PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DOCKET NO PROVIDENCE WATER DEPARTMENT PREFILED TESTIMONY OF CHRISTOPHER P.N. WOODCOCK ON BEHALF OF

~ PEOPLES ~ Formerly EQJ) I TABLE GAS

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

MATTEL, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY Docket No. R Direct Testimony of Richard A.

Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.

May 8, Response to Show Cause Order, Filing of Revised Tariff Sheet And Request for Any Necessary Waivers. The Dayton Power and Light Company

Overview of the IRS Controlled Group Rules and How They May Apply to YOUR Company

Overview of Accounting Systems

MONTANA-DAKOTA UTILITIES CO. INCOME STATEMENT GAS UTILITY - MONTANA TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016

RR9 - Page 229 of 510

CHAPTER IV DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation d/b/a National Grid

CHAPTER III PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF EDWARD J. REYES

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE RATE BASE. November 2014

STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE HONORABLE WALTER J. BRASWELL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Kevin M.

Rocky Mountain Power Docket No Witness: Douglas K. Stuver BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER

2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

VOYAGER ENTERTAINMENT INTERNATIONAL INC

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * DIRECT TESTIMONY AND ATTACHMENTS OF RICHARD R. SCHRUBBE BEHALF OF

BOEING CO FORM 8-K. (Current report filing) Filed 03/11/14 for the Period Ending 03/05/14

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA.

PUC DOCKET NO. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPLICATION OF TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES

Testimony of Stephen E. Pickett

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RICHARD R. SCHRUBBE. on behalf of

DOCKET NO. 13A-0773EG DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS OF LEE E. GABLER

Lee Canova and Lyn Rouchell I. POLICY SUMMARY

UGI UTILITIES, INC. ELECTRIC DIVISION

How Do You Become a Participant in the Plan? Who Pays for the Plan?...

Exhibit A Affidavit of Alan Varvis

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DAVID L. CHONG

Q. Please state your name, occupation and business address. A. My name is Barry E. Sullivan and my business address is th Street, N.W.

Accounting for Facilities & Administrative Cost Recoveries

Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS. A. My name is Suzanne E. Sieferman, and my business address is 1000 East Main

3 Audited Financial Statements and Independent Auditor Requirements

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY Docket No. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PENNICHUCK EAST UTILITY, INC. OW :13426

Syneos Health. Q4 and Full Year 2017 Financial Results. February 28, 2018

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

RR16 - Page 57 of

Chapter 3: Public Sector Pensions: Promoting Public Discussion

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. Washington, D.C FORM 10-K

Black Eagle Dam First Quarter Earnings Webcast April 25, 2018

GridLiance West Transco LLC Docket No. ES Amendment to Application Under Section 204 of the Federal Power Act

APPENDIX IX ATTACHMENT 1 FORMULA RATE PROTOCOLS

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

Mrs. Metts. Volume 1 Tab 9

BHP 2019 Projected Net Revenue Requirement Meeting. October 18, :00 PM MDT Black Hills Energy 7001 Mt Rushmore Rd Rapid City, SD 57702

NATOMAS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2017

VENDOR PROGRAM. Vendors must complete the Vendor Screening and Disclosure Form as follows: *must be completed prior to any signed purchase order

RR16 - Page 1 of

STATE OF CONNECTICUT PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO

June 8, Enclosed find the Attorney General s Direct Testimony and Exhibits and related Proof of Service. Sincerely,

May 18, Black Hills Power, Inc. Docket Nos. ER and EL Compliance Filing Revising Attachment H Formula Rate Protocols

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No. R Direct Testimony of Richard A.

June 23, MEMBERS Governor Rick Scott Attorney General Pam Bondi Chief Financial Officer Jeff Atwater Commissioner Adam Putnam

%ED IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY COMPANY SOURCEGAS LLC TO ACQUIRE ALL ON BEHALF OF AGREEMENT TIMOTHY 5.

Residential Line and Service Extension Allowance Testimony. Application No.: Witnesses: C. Silsbee S. Reed J. Schichtl L. Vellanoweth (U 338-E)

CITY OF PORTLAND, OREGON HYDROELECTRIC POWER FUND INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUGUST 31, 2006 AND 2005

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY REGINA L. BUTLER DIRECTOR ELECTRIC UTILITIES SECTION

Impact of the New Trump Administration on Laws Affecting Mergers and Acquisitions. Impact of Potential Regulatory Changes at FERC John Lilyestrom

Submission Notification

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

Transcription:

Direct Testimony and Exhibits Jeff Berzina Before the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission of the State of South Dakota In the Matter of the Application of Black Hills Power, Inc., a South Dakota Corporation For Authority to Increase Rates In South Dakota Docket No. EL1- December 1, 01

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction And Qualifications... 1 II. Purpose Of Testimony... III. Accounting Records... IV. Functions Of The Service Companies... V. Description Of Cost Allocation Manual... EXHIBITS Exhibit JB-1: Service Agreement (Black Hills Power & Service Company) Exhibit JB-: Service Agreement (Black Hills Power & Utility Holdings) Exhibit JB-: Cost Allocation Manual (CAM) Service Company Exhibit JB-: Cost Allocation Manual (CAM) Utility Holdings i

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 I. INTRODUCTION AND QUALIFICATIONS Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS. A. My name is Jeff Berzina. My business address is th Street, Rapid City, South Dakota 01. Q. BY WHOM ARE YOU EMPLOYED AND IN WHAT CAPACITY? A. I am currently employed by Black Hills Service Company as Vice President and Corporate Controller. Q. ON WHOSE BEHALF ARE YOU APPEARING IN THIS DOCKET? A. I am appearing on behalf of Black Hills Power, Inc. ( Company or Black Hills Power ), a wholly owned subsidiary of Black Hills Corporation. Q. PLEASE OUTLINE YOUR EDUCATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND. A. I have a B.S. degree in Accounting from the University of South Dakota and I am a Certified Public Accountant (South Dakota). I began my career with Black Hills Corporation in 000, and I have worked in various positions within the Accounting and Finance area. I have held the position of Vice President and Corporate Controller of Black Hills Corporation since 00 where I oversee the Accounting and Finance functions, including both our regulated and non-regulated businesses. Prior to joining Black Hills Corporation, I worked in public accounting where I performed audit and tax related services. 1

Q. PLEASE DESCRIBE YOUR DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN YOUR CURRENT POSITION. A. I am responsible for the consistent application of generally accepted accounting principles ( GAAP ) and regulatory accounting principles in accordance with Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ( FERC ) and related financial reporting of Black Hills Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates, including Black Hills Power. II. PURPOSE OF TESTIMONY 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Q. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF YOUR TESTIMONY? A. The purpose of my testimony is to support the following areas of the rate application: Certify Books and Records of Black Hills Power Certify Use of FERC Uniform System of Accounts for Black Hills Power Explain the structure of Black Hills Service Company (Service Company) and Black Hills Utility Holdings, Inc. (Utility Holdings) Describe Cost Allocation Procedures Q. ARE YOU SPONSORING ANY EXHIBITS? A. Yes, I am. I am sponsoring Exhibit Nos. JB-1 through JB- which I will describe and refer to in my testimony. The Exhibits attached to this testimony are as follows: Exhibit JB-1: Service Agreement (Black Hills Power & Service Company)

Exhibit JB-: Service Agreement (Black Hills Power & Utility Holdings) Exhibit JB-: Cost Allocation Manual (CAM) Service Company Exhibit JB-: Cost Allocation Manual (CAM) Utility Holdings Q. HAVE THE TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS WHICH YOU ARE SPONSORING BEEN PREPARED BY YOU OR UNDER YOUR SUPERVISION? A. Yes. III. ACCOUNTING RECORDS 1 1 Q. ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE BOOKS AND RECORDS OF BLACK HILLS POWER AND THE MANNER IN WHICH THEY ARE KEPT? A. Yes. I certify the financial statements and records have been prepared in conformity with GAAP and in accordance with accounting requirements of the FERC as set forth in its applicable Uniform System of Accounts. 1 IV. FUNCTIONS OF THE SERVICE COMPANIES 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Q. WHY WAS BLACK HILLS SERVICE COMPANY FORMED? A. In January 00, Black Hills Corporation became a registered holding company under the Public Utility Holding Company Act 1 ( PUHCA 1 ). One of the many requirements under PUHCA 1 was to form a service company and to transfer employees that perform common functions for Black Hills Corporation s subsidiaries to the Service Company. The Service Company was formed on December 0, 00, and became fully operational on January 1, 00. PUHCA 1 was subsequently repealed, and the Energy Policy Act of 00 created the

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Public Utility Holding Company Act of 00. This act moved the jurisdiction of service companies to the FERC. Q. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF BLACK HILLS SERVICE COMPANY? A. The purpose of Service Company is to provide various support services, both administrative and management, to all of Black Hills Corporation s subsidiaries in an efficient and economical way and to ensure these support costs are allocated among Black Hills Corporation and its subsidiaries in a fair and equitable manner. Q. WHY WAS UTILITY HOLDINGS FORMED? A. Black Hills Corporation originally formed Utility Holdings to hold and clearly separate the regulated utility assets acquired by Black Hills Corporation in 00 (i.e.: former Aquila assets). Utility Holdings is a subsidiary of Black Hills Corporation, and its employees currently provide utility operations services for all of Black Hills Corporations regulated utilities. Q. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF BLACK HILLS UTILITY HOLDINGS? A. The purpose of Utility Holdings is to provide certain services, principally related to engineering and planning, customer service, billing and information technology, to the regulated utilities (such as Black Hills Power) that are owned by or subsidiaries of Black Hills Corporation. Q. DOES BLACK HILLS POWER OBTAIN SERVICES FROM BLACK HILLS SERVICE COMPANY? A. Yes. This avoids the duplication of these business functions by each of the regulated and non-regulated business units of Black Hills Corporation. By

providing support services on a centralized basis, efficiencies are created when compared to stand-alone business functions. Q. DOES BLACK HILLS POWER OBTAIN SERVICES FROM UTILITY HOLDINGS? A. Yes. This avoids the duplication of these business functions by each of the regulated business units of Black Hills Corporation. By providing support 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 services on a centralized basis, efficiencies are created when compared to standalone business functions. Q. ARE THESE SERVICES PROVIDED UNDER A WRITTEN AGREEMENTS? A. Yes, Black Hills Power has Service Agreements with Service Company and Utility Holdings. Both Service Company and Utility Holdings provide their services at cost to Black Hills Power and other Black Hills Corporation affiliates through direct charges and indirect charges. Expenses for support services are charged to Black Hills Power on a monthly basis pursuant to the Service Agreements. A copy of the Service Company Service Agreement is attached to my testimony as Exhibit JB-1. A copy of the Utility Holdings Service Agreement is attached as Exhibit JB-.

V. DESCRIPTION OF COST ALLOCATION MANUAL Q. HOW ARE EXPENSES CHARGED TO BLACK HILLS POWER BY SERVICE COMPANY AND UTILITY HOLDINGS? A. Expenses, as well as fixed assets, are charged to Black Hills Power through an allocation process described in both the Service Company Allocation Manual and Utility Holdings Allocation Manual. Q. DOES THE COST ALLOCATION MANUAL DESCRIBE THE METHODOLOGIES USED FOR ALLOCATION? A. Yes. The methodologies are described on pages - for the Service Company Cost Allocation Manual (CAM) and pages - for the Utility Holdings CAM. The departments and services provided by Service Company and Utility Holdings 1 are different. The Service Company provides support services such as 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 accounting/finance, administrative, management, legal counsel, and human resources, to all regulated and non-regulated business units of Black Hills Corporation. Conversely, Utility Holdings provides services related to only the regulated businesses of Black Hills Corporation such as engineering and transmission planning, customer service, billing, and information technology. In addition, Black Hills Power does not receive services from every department of the Service Company or Utility Holdings. A copy the Cost Allocation Manual 0 (CAM) for Service Company is attached as Exhibit JB-. A copy the Cost 1 Allocation Manual for Utility Holdings is attached as Exhibit JB-.

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Q. HAVE THE CAMS BEEN PROVIDED TO ANY REGULATORY COMMISSION? A. Yes. The Service Company CAM and the Utility Holdings CAM have been previously provided to other Commissions in which Black Hills Corporation operates its regulated utility businesses. The Service Company CAM was previously provided to this Commission in the Company s 00 rate case. Q. IS IT NORMAL PRACTICE FOR DIVERSIFIED UTILITIES TO USE CAMS FOR COMMON BUSINESS COSTS? A. Yes. The CAM was designed to distribute support costs to subsidiaries. Efficiencies are gained by Black Hills Corporation and each of its affiliates by providing support services on a centralized basis rather than as a stand-alone business function. Q. CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DIRECT AND INDIRECT CHARGES? A. Yes. Direct charges are those costs specifically associated with providing support to an identified subsidiary or group of identified subsidiaries. This means that the costs are known exactly to which subsidiary or group of subsidiaries these costs relate to. An example of a direct cost would be a person in the Regulatory Department working on this rate case. The person would directly charge their time spent working on this rate case to Black Hills Power. Indirect charges are those costs that are not associated with an identified subsidiary, meaning they indirectly support all subsidiaries or directly support the operation of the

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 applicable Service Company or Utility Holdings. An example of an indirect cost would be a person in the Regulatory Department attending training related to electric utilities. The cost would be allocated among all of Black Hills Corporation s electric utilities, as the training is associated with electric utilities in general, rather than a specific electric utility. The Cost Allocation Manuals provide a more detailed explanation of the treatment of direct and indirect costs. Q. HOW ARE THESE SERVICES BILLED TO BLACK HILLS CORPORATION S DIFFERENT SUBSIDIARIES? A. The cost of services that can be directly assigned to a subsidiary are billed directly to that business unit. This is true for all of Black Hills Corporation s subsidiaries. The indirect costs that are attributable to more than one business unit are allocated based on a formula that is designed to result in a fair and equitable allocation for those costs. Indirect costs are allocated using one of several pre-defined allocation factors. All indirect costs of that department are then allocated using that factor. When determining which allocation factor should be assigned to each cost center, a factor was selected based on the specific cost driver of that department. For example, Utility Holdings department 1, bill processing, is allocated based on customer count ratio. This pre-defined allocation was used as the number of bills processed relates to the number of customers by utility. For certain cost centers, a specific cost driver may not be clearly identifiable or the driver may not be cost efficient to compute on a continuing basis. In these instances, a three-pronged general allocation factor is used, which is referred to as the blended ratio. In

addition, some departments utilize a holding company blended ratio. The 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 difference between the blended ratio and the holding company blended ratio is that the holding company blended ratio allocates a percentage of costs to Utility Holdings. Q. DO THESE ALLOCATIONS OF INDIRECT COSTS RESULT IN A FAIR COST BEING BILLED TO BLACK HILLS POWER? A. Yes. The methods used by the Service Company and Utility Holdings were established by reviewing relevant cost factors and are consistent with industry practice in allocating common costs. In addition, services that are identified to a specific project or company are directly billed to that project or company. The combination of assigning direct costs for identifiable expenses and allocation of indirect costs fairly and accurately represents Black Hills Power s share of the costs of Service Company and Utility Holdings in the provision of services to Black Hills Power. Q. IS THERE AN ADJUSTMENT FOR SERVICE COMPANY AND UTILITY HOLDINGS ALLOCATIONS IN THE REVENUE REQUIREMENT MODEL? A. Yes. Schedules H- and H- contains the corporate costs charged to Black Hills Power from Service Company and Utility Holdings, respectively, for the twelve months ending June 0, 01. The total pro forma adjustment is $1,, for Service Company and $,0,1 for Utility Holdings.

Q. DOES THAT CONCLUDE YOUR DIRECT TESTIMONY? A. Yes.