European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The EBRD CIF Special Fund

European Bank for Reconstruction and Development The EBRD CIF Special Fund Annual Financial Report 31 December 2016

Contents Income statement... 1 Statement of comprehensive income... 1 Balance sheet... 1 Statement of changes in contributors resources... 2 Statement of cash flows... 2 Accounting policies... 3 Risk management... 9 Notes to the financial statements... 15 Independent Auditor s report to the Board of Governors... 19

Income statement For the year ended 31 December 2016 Restated * Year to Year to 31 December 31 December 2016 2015 Note million million Net interest 4 4 Amounts refunded to contributor (3) (2) Concessional loan discount 9 (4) (15) Impairment charge on loan investments 7 (4) (8) Disbursements for technical co-operation 4 (1) (1) Foreign exchange movements (2) (9) General administration expenses (1) (2) Net loss for the year (11) (33) Attributable to: Contributors (11) (33) Statement of comprehensive income For the year ended 31 December 2016 Restated * Year to Year to 31 December 31 December 2016 2015 million million Net loss for the year (11) (33) Other comprehensive expense Foreign exchange movement between functional and presentational currencies (2) (9) Total comprehensive expense (13) (42) Attributable to: Contributors (13) (42) These items will not subsequently be reclassified to profit or loss. Balance sheet At 31 December 2016 Restated * Restated * Assets 31 December 31 December 1 January 2016 2015 2015 Note million million million million million million Placements with credit institutions 224 201 150 Contributions receivable 5 27 49 25 Loan investments Loans 6 104 94 65 Less: Provisions for impairment 7 (18) (14) (6) 86 80 59 Total assets 337 330 234 Liabilities Other financial liabilities 8 3 3 2 Concessional loan discount 9 30 26 17 Contributors' resources Contributions 5 417 401 273 Reserves and accumulated loss (113) (100) (58) Total contributors resources 304 301 215 Total liabilities 337 330 234 Memorandum items Undrawn loan commitments 70 65 46 *Refer to Note 3 1

Statement of changes in contributors resources For the year ended 31 December 2016 Restated * Restated * Accumulated Restated * Contributions General reserve loss Total million million million million At 31 December 2014 273 (2) (56) 215 Contributions received and receivable 96 - - 96 Revaluation of contributions 32 - - 32 Total comprehensive expense - (9) (33) (42) At 31 December 2015 401 (11) - (89) 301 Contributions received and receivable 4 - - 4 Revaluation of contributions 12 - - 12 Total comprehensive expense - (2) (11) (13) At 31 December 2016 417 (13) (100) 304 Statement of cash flows For the year ended 31 December 2016 Year to Restated * 31 December 31 December 2016 2015 million million million million Cash flows used in operating activities Net loss for the period (11) (33) Adjustment for: Net interest (4) (4) Income refunded 3 2 Concessional loan discount 4 15 Impairment charge on loan investments 4 8 Foreign exchange movement 2 9 (2) (3) Net interest received 2 1 Income refunded (2) (2) Increase/(decrease) in operating assets: Proceeds from repayment of loans 1 1 Funds advanced for loans (7) (29) Net cash used in operating activities (8) (32) Cash flows from financing activities Contributions received 26 72 Net cash from financing activities 26 72 Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 18 40 Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period 201 150 Effect of foreign exchange rate changes 5 11 Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December 224 201 2

Accounting policies The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated. A. Basis of preparation These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention and have been prepared on a going concern basis. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the policies of the EBRD CIF Special Fund ("the Fund"). The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where judgements and estimates are significant to the financial statements, are disclosed in Critical accounting estimates and judgements within the section for accounting policies. New and amended IFRS mandatorily effective for the current reporting period There are a number of amendments to standards effective for the current reporting period which have no or negligible impact on the Fund s financial statements, namely: IFRS 11: Joint Arrangements IAS 1: Presentation of Financial Statements IAS 16: Property, Plant and Equipment IAS 38: Intangible Assets IFRS not yet mandatorily effective but adopted early IFRS 9: Financial Instruments is the IASB s replacement project for IAS 39. The Standard has developed in phases and was completed in July 2014 with a mandatory application date for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. The Fund adopted the first phase recognition and measurement of financial assets (November 2009) in its 2010 financial statements. See the accounting policy for financial assets for more details. 3

IFRS not yet mandatorily effective and not adopted early The following standards are not yet effective and have not been adopted early. Pronouncement Nature of change Potential Impact Amendments to: IFRS 2: Share-based Accounting for a modification of a share-based payment transaction that changes its classification from The Fund considers that this standard is not Payment cash-settled to equity-settled. applicable operations. to its Effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after Amendments to: IFRS 4: Insurance Contracts IFRS 9 Financial Instruments 1 January 2018. Provides guidance for insurers in applying IFRS 9: Financial Instruments with IFRS 4: Insurance Contracts. Effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018. Classification and measurement of financial liabilities (October 2010). Hedge accounting (November 2013). Impairment methodology and introduction of fair value through other comprehensive income measurement category for financial assets represented by simple debt instruments (July 2014). The Fund considers that this standard is not applicable to its operations. The Fund is yet to assess the potential impact of adopting this standard. Amendments to: IFRS 10: Consolidation Financial Statements and IAS 28: Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures IFRS 15: Revenue from Contracts with Customers IFRS 16: Leases Amendments to: IAS 7: Statement of Cash Flows Amendments to: IAS 12: Income Taxes IFRS 9 to be adopted in its entirety for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. Provides guidance for accounting for the loss of control of a subsidiary as a result of a transaction involving an associate or a joint venture that is accounted for using the equity method. Effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after a date to be determined by the IASB. Establishes principles for reporting useful information to users of financial statements about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from an entity s contracts with customers. Effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018. Sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract, ie the customer ( lessee ) and the supplier ( lessor ). Effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019. An entity shall provide disclosures that enable users of financial statements to evaluate changes in liabilities arising from financing activities, including both changes arising from cash flows and non-cash changes. Effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2017. Clarifies the requirements on recognition of deferred tax assets for unrealized losses on debt instruments measured at fair value Effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2017. The Fund considers that this amendment has no applicability to its existing operations. The Fund is yet to assess the potential impact of adopting this standard. The Fund considers that this amendment has no applicability to its existing operations. This is a disclosure requirement only which the Fund will comply with in 2017. The Fund is exempt from all forms of direct taxes and so this Standard is not applicable. 4

B. Significant accounting policies Financial assets - Classification and measurement The Fund early adopted the first instalment of IFRS 9: Financial Instruments, concerning the classification and measurement of financial assets, with effect from 1 January 2010. Pursuant to that adoption, the Fund classifies its financial assets in the following categories: those measured at amortised cost and those measured at fair value. This classification depends on both the contractual characteristics of the assets and the business model adopted for their management. Financial assets at amortised cost An investment is classified as amortised cost only if both of the following criteria are met: the objective of the Fund s business model is to hold the asset to collect the contractual cash flow; and the contractual terms give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal outstanding, interest being consideration for the time value of money and the credit risk associated with the principal amount outstanding. Investments meeting these criteria are measured initially at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial assets. The initial fair value of a financial asset is normally represented by the transaction price exchanged for its acquisition or origination as the price is assumed to reflect the market conditions that an entity would normally have taken into consideration in determining the transaction price. The Fund makes loans to its borrowers at concessional rates and therefore each loan is priced at a discount to normal market rates. This discount to fair value is accounted for as a "day one" loss through the Fund's income statement, with a corresponding liability. The day one loss is recognised upon signing of the loan. Once the Fund disburses the loan to its borrower, the day one loss is reflected within the loan investment as it forms part of the initial fair value of the asset. Subsequently, these loans are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment that may be necessary. The initial fair value discount applied to each loan is therefore recovered in the effective interest rate at which income is recognised in the income statement over the tenor of the loan. The Fund s financial assets at amortised cost are recognised at settlement date. Financial assets at fair value If either of the two criteria above is not met, the debt instrument is classified as fair value through profit or loss. The Fund does not currently have any such assets in this category. Financial liabilities The Fund has not adopted early that part of IFRS 9 which relates to financial liabilities and therefore still applies IAS 39: Financial Instruments. All financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost. Impairment of financial assets Financial assets at amortised cost The Fund has not adopted early that part of IFRS 9 which relates to impairment and therefore still applies IAS 39: Financial Instruments. Where there is objective evidence that an identified loan asset is impaired, specific provisions for impairment are recognised in the income statement. Impairment is quantified as the difference between the carrying amount of the asset and the net present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the asset s original effective interest rate where applicable. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced through the use of an allowance account and the amount of the loss is recognised in the income statement. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced directly only upon write-off. Resulting adjustments include the unwinding of the discount in the income statement over the life of the asset, and any adjustments required in respect of a reassessment of the initial impairment. 5

The criteria that the Fund uses to determine that there is objective evidence of an impairment loss include: delinquency in contractual payments of principal or interest; cash flow difficulties experienced by the borrower; breach of loan covenants or conditions; initiation of bankruptcy proceedings; deterioration in the borrower s competitive position; and deterioration in the value of collateral. Provisions for impairment of classes of similar assets that are not individually identified as impaired are calculated on a portfolio basis (the general provision). The methodology used for assessing such impairment is based on a risk-rated approach for non-sovereign assets. The Fund s methodology calculates impairment on an incurred loss basis. Impairment is deducted from the asset categories on the balance sheet. Impairment, less any amounts reversed during the year, is charged to the income statement. When a loan is deemed uncollectible the principal is written off against the related impairment provision. Such loans are written off only after all necessary procedures have been completed and the amount of the loss has been determined. Recoveries are credited to the income statement if previously written off. Loans and advances are generally renegotiated in response to an adverse change in the circumstances of the borrower. Depending upon the degree to which the original loan is amended, it may continue to be recognised or will be derecognised and replaced with a new loan. To the extent the original loan is retained, it will continue to be shown as overdue if appropriate and individually impaired where the renegotiated payments of interest and principal will not recover the original carrying amount of the asset. Contributors resources The Fund recognises contributions received from the contributors as a liability on the basis that, should a contributor choose to withdraw from the Fund, the Fund is obligated to return such contributions to the extent these are not needed to meet existing commitments and obligations of the Fund. General reserve The general reserve represents foreign exchange movements on translation from functional currency to presentational currency. Statement of cash flows The statement of cash flows is prepared using the indirect method. Cash and cash equivalents comprise balances with less than three months maturity from the date of the transaction, which are available for use at short notice and that are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value. Foreign currencies The functional currency of the Fund is the United States dollar (USD) as this reflects the transactions, events and conditions under which the Fund conducts its business. For financial statement reporting purposes the unit of measurement is the euro. For functional currency reporting, transactions in currencies other than USD are translated into USD at exchange rates ruling at the time of the transaction. All assets and liabilities in currencies other than USD are re-translated into USD at spot rates ruling at 31 December 2016 with the resultant exchange gains or losses taken to the income statement. For financial statement reporting, income and expenses (excluding exchange gains or losses) are translated from the functional currency to euro using exchange rates ruling at the time of the transaction. Exchange gains or losses are translated from the functional currency to euro at 31 December 2016 using the average exchange rate for the year. Assets and liabilities denominated in the functional currency are re-translated to euro at spot rates ruling at 31 December 2016 with the resultant exchange gains and losses taken to other comprehensive income. 6

Contributions Contributions received in currencies other than USD are translated into USD at exchange rates ruling at the time of the transaction. Currencies are then subsequently re-translated to the presentational currency at the year-end exchange rate. Contributions are recognised as receivable on the balance sheet on the date of project approval by the Board of Directors ("the Board") of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development ("the Bank") following receipt of a letter of commitment from the Contributor. Contributions receivable have not been discounted on a present value basis as there is no indication as to their precise payment date. The Fund is satisfied that they will be realised for the amounts stated in the financial statements. Interest Interest is recorded on an accruals basis using the effective interest method. Interest income is recognised within 'net interest income' in the income statement. Interest expense is recognised in 'operating expenses' in the income statement. Interest is recognised on impaired loans through unwinding the discount used in deriving the present value of expected future cash flows. Disbursements for technical cooperation Disbursements for technical cooperation, which represent payments for consultancy services provided to the Fund over a period of time, are recorded as expenditure over the period during which the services are received. Taxation In accordance with Article 53 of the Agreement Establishing the Bank ( the AEB ) within the scope of its official activities, the Bank, its assets, property and income are exempt from all direct taxes and all taxes and duties levied upon goods and services acquired or imported, except for those parts of taxes or duties that represent charges for public utility services. As described in note 1, this exemption is extended to the Fund. C. Critical accounting estimates and judgements Preparing financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the Fund to make estimates and judgements that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts included in the income statement during the reporting period. The Fund s critical accounting estimates and judgements are as follows: Provisions for the impairment of loan investments The Fund s method for determining the level of impairment of loan investments is described within the accounting policies section of the report and further explained under credit risk within the risk management section of the report. As described in the risk management section the Fund participates in investments jointly with the Bank and credit risk is jointly managed. Accordingly, the risk management disclosures are based on the Bank s risk processes and procedures. Portfolio provisions for the unidentified impairment of loan investments at 31 December 2016 were 1.6 million (2015: 1.7 million). During 2016 the Bank carried out its regular annual review of the loss parameters underpinning estimates of unidentified impairment, with the aim of better reflecting the Bank's loss experience. This review resulted in a modest reduction in the level of portfolio provisions. The key revision to these estimates was: Probability of default In determining the probabilities of default for each risk rating, the historical datasets used to calibrate the rates were updated to include 2015. This was carried out for both the internal and external data used to determine the final probability of default rates. 7

If this change to loss parameter estimates had been applied at 31 December 2015, the portfolio provisions for the unidentified impairment of loan investments would have reduced by 0.2million from 1.7 million to 1.5 million. No estimate of the effect these changes may have on future periods has been undertaken on the grounds of impracticability. In addition, the sensitivity of portfolio provisions as at 31 December 2016 to the key variables used in determining the level of impairment is provided below. Risk ratings If all loan investments were upgraded by three notches or detailed ratings on the Bank s probability of default rating scale, this would result in a reduction of 1.3 million in portfolio provisions on loan investments (2015: 1.4 million). Conversely, if all loan investments were downgraded by three notches or detailed risk ratings on the Bank s probability of default rating scale, this would result in a charge to the income statement of 2.9 million in relation to portfolio provisions for loans (2015: 2.8 million). Probability of default rates In determining the probabilities of default for each risk rating, the relative weighting applied to external data and the Bank s own experience is reviewed annually. The 2016 general provisioning methodology applies a 67 per cent weighting to the Bank s own experience and a 33 per cent weighting to external data. A +/- 10 percentage points change in the weighting assigned to the Bank s own experience would lead to a change in portfolio provisions of -/+ 0.2 million (2015: 0.2 million). Loss emergence period Provisions for unidentified impairment are made to reflect losses arising from events existing but not identified at the balance sheet date and which will emerge within a 12 month period from that date. If the loss emergence period was reduced to three months it is broadly estimated that this would result in a decrease in the portfolio provision charged to the income statement of 1.0 million (2015: 1.2 million). Loss given default rates A change in loss given default rates by ten percentage points would lead to a change in portfolio provisions of +/- 0.4million (2015: 0.4 million). With respect to specific provisions, a decrease of ten per cent level of impaired loans would have an impact of - 1.6 million (2015: an increase or decrease of ten percent in the level of impaired loans would have an impact of 1.6 million). Financial assets at amortised cost initial recognition The Fund's method for determining the fair value on the initial recognition of concessional loans is further detailed in the significant accounting policies section of the report. 8

Risk management The Fund was established to provide a long-term contribution in support of activities that promote low carbon technologies with significant potential for long-term greenhouse gas savings and other climate change activities in certain countries of operations of the Bank. To achieve this, the Fund provides concessional loans alongside the Bank s market rate loans. The Fund s resources may also be used for grants in support of technical assistance. As the primary purpose of the Fund is to provide concessional lending and grants rather than to generate a return on its assets, most financial risks are not actively managed by the Fund. As the Fund participates in investments alongside the Bank, although under different terms, credit risk is jointly managed; however the Fund does not hedge against market risk and is hence exposed to interest rate and foreign exchange risk. Risk governance The Fund follows the Bank's risk governance procedures as below: The Bank s overall framework for identifying and managing risks is underpinned by the Banking Vice- Presidency being the first line of defence related to debt and equity operations and an independent second line of defence control functions, including the Risk Management department, Office of the Chief Compliance Officer, Environmental and Social Department, Finance Department, Evaluations Department and other relevant units. An Internal Audit Department acts as third line of defence and independently assesses the effectiveness of the processes within the first and second lines of defence. The Vice President, Risk and Compliance, Chief Risk Officer (CRO) is responsible for ensuring the independent risk management of the Banking exposures, including adequate processes and governance structure for independent identification, measurement, monitoring and mitigation of risks incurred by the Bank. The challenge of the control functions, review of their status and assessment of their ability to perform duties independently falls within the remit of the Audit Committee of the Board. Matters related to Bank-wide risk and associated policies and procedures are considered by the Risk Committee. The Risk Committee is accountable to the President. It oversees all aspects of the Banking portfolio across all sectors and countries, and provides advice on Risk Management policies, measures and controls. It also approves proposals for new products submitted by Banking. The membership comprises senior managers across the Bank including representatives from Risk Management, Finance, Banking and the Office of the General Counsel. The Risk Committee is chaired by the VP Risk and Compliance, CRO. The Managing Director, Risk Management reports to the VP Risk and Compliance, CRO and leads the overall management of the department. Risk Management provides an independent assessment of risks associated with individual investments undertaken by the Bank, and performs an ongoing review of the portfolio to monitor credit, market and liquidity risks and to identify appropriate risk management actions. It also assesses and proposes ways to manage risks arising from correlations and concentrations within the portfolio, and ensures that adequate systems and controls are put in place for identifying and managing operational risks across the Bank. It develops and maintains the Risk Management policies to facilitate Banking and Treasury operations and promotes risk awareness across the Bank. In exercising its responsibilities, Risk Management is guided by its mission to: Provide assurance to stakeholders that risk decision-making in the Bank is balanced and within agreed appetite, and that control processes are rigorously designed and applied; and Support the Bank s business strategy including the maximisation of transition impact through provision of efficient and effective delivery of risk management advice, challenge and decision making. A. Credit risk Credit risk is the potential loss to a portfolio that could result from the default of a counterparty or the deterioration of its creditworthiness. The Fund may also be exposed to concentration risk, which is the risk arising from too high a proportion of the portfolio being allocated to a specific country, industry sector or obligor, or to a particular type of instrument or individual transaction. 9

The Fund is exposed to credit risk as borrowers and counterparties could default on their contractual obligations, or the value of the Fund's investments could become impaired. The carrying amounts of financial assets presented on the balance sheet, together with the undrawn loan commitments as shown under memorandum items, best represents the Fund s maximum exposure to credit risk at 31 December 2016 and 31 December 2015, without taking account of any collateral held or other credit enhancements. Credit risk management and measurement As stated previously, the Fund participates jointly with the Bank in the financing of investments in the Bank s countries of operations. It therefore benefits from the same governance process employed by the Bank in the measurement and management of credit exposures, which is described below. Underlying principles and procedures The Board of Directors ("the Board") approves a document that defines the principles underlying the credit process for the approval, management and review of Banking exposures. The Audit Committee periodically reviews these principles and its review is submitted to the Board for approval. Individual projects The Operations Committee reviews all Banking projects prior to their submission for Board approval. The Committee is chaired by the First Vice President and Head of Client Services Group and its membership comprises senior managers of the Bank, including the VP Risk & Compliance, CRO and the Managing Director, Risk Management. A number of frameworks for smaller projects are considered by the Small Business Investment Committee or by senior management under a delegated authority framework supervised by the Operations Committee. The project approval process is designed to ensure compliance with the Bank s criteria for sound banking, transition impact and additionality. It operates within the authority delegated by the Board, via the President, to approve projects within Board-approved framework operations. The Operations Committee is also responsible for approving significant changes to existing operations. Risk Management conducts reviews of all exposures within the Banking portfolio. At each review, Risk Management assesses whether there has been any change in the risk profile of the exposure, recommends actions to mitigate risk and reconfirms or adjusts the risk rating. Portfolio level review Risk Management reports on the development of the portfolio as a whole on a quarterly basis to the Audit Committee of the Board. The report includes a summary of key factors affecting the portfolio and provides analysis and commentary on trends within the portfolio and various sub-portfolios. It also includes reporting on compliance with all portfolio risk limits including an explanation of any limit breaches. To identify emerging risk and enable appropriate risk mitigating actions Risk Management also conducts regular Bank-wide (top-down) and country level (bottom-up) stress testing exercises and comprehensive reviews of its investment portfolios. The Bank recognises that any resulting risk mitigation is constrained by the limited geographical space within which the Bank operates. EBRD internal ratings Probability of default (PD) The Bank assigns its internal risk ratings to all counterparties, including borrowers, investee companies, guarantors and sovereigns in the Banking portfolio. Risk ratings reflect the financial strength of the counterparty as well as consideration of any implicit support, for example from a major shareholder. The sovereign rating takes into consideration the ratings assigned by external rating agencies. For sovereign risk projects, the overall rating is the same as the sovereign rating. For non-sovereign operations, probability of default ratings are normally capped by the sovereign rating, except where the Bank has recourse to a guarantor from outside the country which may have a better rating than the local sovereign rating. 10

The table below shows the Bank s internal probability of default rating scale from 1.0 (lowest risk) to 8.0 (highest risk) and how this maps to the external ratings of Standard & Poor s (S&P). References to risk rating through this text relate to probability of default ratings unless otherwise specified. EBRD risk EBRD risk rating External rating equivalent Category name Broader category category 1 1.0 AAA Excellent 1.7 AA+ 2 2.0 AA Very Strong 2.3/2.5 AA- 3 4 5 6 7 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.7 4.0 4.3 4.7 5.0 5.3 5.7 6.0 6.3 6.7 7.0 7.3 A+ A A- BBB+ BBB BBB- BB+ BB BB- B+ B B- CCC+ CCC CCC-/CC/C Strong Good Investment Grade Fair Risk class 5 Weak Risk class 6 Special Attention 8 8.0 D Non-performing Classified Loss given default (LGD) The Bank assigns loss given default percentages on a scale of 0 to 100 determined by the seniority of the instrument in which the Bank invested. Non-performing loans (NPL) NPL definition An asset is designated as non-performing when either the borrower is more than 90 days past due on payment to any material creditor, or when Risk Management considers that the counterparty is unlikely to pay its credit obligations in full without recourse by the Bank to actions such as realising security, if held. Provisioning methodology A specific provision is raised on all NPLs accounted for at amortised cost. The provision represents the amount of expected loss, being the difference between the outstanding amount from the client and the recovery amount. The expected recovery amount is equal to the present value of the estimated future cash flows discounted at the loan s original effective interest rate. General portfolio provisions In the performing portfolio, provisions are held against losses incurred but not identified at the balance sheet date. These amounts are based on the PD rates associated with the rating assigned to each counterparty, the LGD parameters reflecting product seniority and the Exposure at Default (EAD). EAD is calculated based on outstanding operating assets and the expected disbursement of committed but not yet drawn amounts. Credit risk exposures Placements with credit institutions The Fund s placements with credit institutions were all classified at the internal risk rating category of 2. 11

Loan investments Set out below is an analysis of the Fund s loan investments and the associated impairment provisions for each of the Bank s relevant internal risk rating categories. Portfolio Specific Neither past provisions for provisions for Total net of due nor unidentified unidentified impairment Impairment impaired Impaired Total Total impairment impairment provisions provisions Risk category million million million % million million million % 5: Fair 55-55 53 - - 55-6: Weak 22-22 21 - - 22-7: Special Attention 11-11 11 (2) - 9 18 8: Non-performing - 16 16 15 - (16) - 100 At 31 December 2016 88 16 104 100 (2) (16) 86 17 Restated * Restated * Restated * Portfolio Specific Restated * Neither past provisions for provisions for Total net of Restated * due nor Restated * Restated * Restated * unidentified unidentified impairment Impairment impaired Impaired Total Total impairment impairment provisions provisions Risk category million million million % million million million % 5: Fair 49-49 52 - - 49-6: Weak 21-21 22 - - 21-7: Special Attention 8-8 9 (2) - 6 25 8: Non-performing - 16 16 17 - (12) 4 75 At 31 December 2015 78 16 94 100 (2) (12) 80 15 At 31 December 2016 the Fund had security arrangements in place for loan investments with a disbursed value of 5.2 million (2015: 14.1 million). Undrawn loan commitments Set out below is an analysis of the Fund s undrawn commitments for loan investments for each of the Bank s relevant internal risk rating categories. Undrawn loan commitments Undrawn loan commitments 2016 2015 Risk category million million 5: Fair 1 6 6: Weak 48 39 7: Special attention 21 20 At 31 December 70 65 Concentration of credit risk exposure The following table breaks down the main credit risk exposures at the carrying amount by geographical region. Undrawn loan Undrawn loan Restated * commitments Loans commitments Loans 2016 2016 2015 2015 million million million million Kazakhstan 39 14 33 14 Tajikistan 11 3 12 - Turkey 1 61 1 56 Morocco 9-10 - Ukraine 10 26 9 24 At 31 December 70 104 65 94 12

The following table breaks down the main credit risk exposures at the carrying amount by industry sector. Undrawn loan Undrawn loan Restated * commitments Loans commitments Loans 2016 2016 2015 2015 million million million million Depository credit (banks) 1 61 2 56 Municipal and environmental infrastructure 26 6 21 5 Power and energy 41 35 40 33 Transport 1-1 - Manufacturing & Services 1 2 1 - At 31 December 70 104 65 94 B. Market risk Market risk is the potential loss that could result from adverse market movements. The drivers of market risk for the Fund are interest rate and foreign exchange risk. Market risk management and measurement As discussed at the beginning of the risk management section, the Fund does not actively monitor or hedge against market risk. Interest rate risk Interest rate risk is the risk that the value of a financial instrument will fluctuate due to changes in market interest rates. The length of time for which the rate of interest is fixed on a financial instrument indicates to what extent it is exposed to interest rate risk. The Fund's placements and floating rate loan investments are repriced to market interest rates within one month and six months respectively, therefore the exposure to interest rate risk is considered to be minimal. The Fund also has a number of fixed rate loan investments. Based on a reasonable basis point change in the underlying interest rates, the potential impact to the Fund s net profit is considered to be minimal. Foreign exchange risk Foreign exchange risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in foreign exchange rates. 13

The Fund's net exposure to functional currency foreign exchange risk (euro to USD) is outlined in the table below. United States Pounds Tajik Euro dollars Sterling Somoni 2016 2016 2016 2016 Total million million million million million Total assets 90 245-2 337 Total liabilities (158) (179) - - (337) Net currency position at 31 December 2016 (68) 66-2 - Restated * Restated * Restated * United States Pounds Euro dollars Sterling Restated * 2015 2015 2015 Total million million million million Total assets 93 236 1 330 Total liabilities (152) (178) - (330) Net currency position at 31 December 2015 (59) 58 1 - Based on the average five year absolute rolling average movement in the USD to euro exchange rate, the potential impact on other comprehensive income due to presentation currency movement, from a 5 per cent strengthening or weakening (2015: 5 per cent) is 6.0 million (2015: considered minimal). C. Liquidity risk Liquidity risk is the risk that an entity will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with financial liabilities that are settled by delivering cash or another financial asset. The Rules of the Fund require that operations are financed from the resources of the Fund which comprise of contributions received. Accordingly, the Fund cannot commit more than the available resources and cannot borrow funds to finance operations. The Fund recognises contributions received as a liability, which will be returned to the contributors either upon termination of the Fund, or to the extent that funds remain uncommitted, upon request from the contributors. As a result, the Fund s exposure to liquidity risk is considered to be minimal. 14

Notes to the financial statements 1. Creation of the Special Fund On 30 May 2008 the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development ( IBRD ), the Bank and other multilateral development banks reached an agreement on the design and establishment of the Climate Investment Fund ( CIF ) which comprises the Strategic Climate Fund ( SCF ) and the Clean Technology Fund ( CTF ), the Contributors. The IBRD acts as a Trustee for the CIF. The CTF was established to provide scaled up financing in order to contribute to the demonstration, deployment and transfer of low carbon technologies with significant potential for long-term greenhouse gas emission savings. The objective of the SCF is to support financing for scaled-up, transformational action in support of adaptation and mitigation measures to specific climate change challenges. The creation of the Fund was approved by the Board at its meeting on 21 October 2009 and is administered, inter alia, in accordance with the AEB and the Rules of the Fund. The Fund became operational on 21 April 2010 following the signing of the Financial Procedures Agreements for the SCF and CTF. The Fund s principal office is located in London at One Exchange Square, EC2A 2JN. The Fund was established in accordance with Article 18 of the AEB. The Fund is not part of the ordinary capital resources of the Bank, but any privileges and immunities available to the Bank are extended to the Fund. 2. President s responsibilities The President is responsible for preparing the financial statements in accordance with IFRS issued by the IASB. 3. Restatement The Fund measures its concessional loans at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Amortised cost financial instruments are initially measured at their fair value on recognition. In the case of concessional loans, the initial fair value of the loan includes the day one loss to discount the loans back to market rates. In prior years, the day one losses on all concessional loans were recorded as a separate financial liability. However, the day one loss for all disbursed loans are more appropriately included as part of the loan s amortised cost within loan investments. The impairment provision was also therefore restated due to the reduction in the carrying value of the loans. The prior year restatement reflects the impact of this change. The restatement resulted in a decrease to impairment charge on loan investments of 5 million on both the Income Statement and Balance Sheet. Effect on 2015 million (Decrease) in Impairment charge on loan investments (5) Increase in profit 5 (Decrease) in Provision for impairment (5) Increase in Loan investments 5 The restatement resulted in a decrease in loan investments and concessional loan discount of 29 million on the Balance Sheet. Previous Restated 31 December 2015 Adjustment 31 December 2015 million million million Loans 123 (29) 94 Concessional loan discount 55 (29) 26 15

4. Disbursements for technical cooperation Commitments Undrawn Total projects approved Disbursements commitments million million million At 31 December 2014 5 (4) 1 Movement in the year 1 (1) - At 31 December 2015 6 (5) 1 Movement in the year - (1) (1) At 31 December 2016 6 (6) - 5. Contributions 2016 2015 million million Cumulative contributions received Clean Technology Fund 362 329 Strategic Climate Fund 28 23 Contributions received at 31 December 390 352 Contributions receivable Clean Technology Fund 26 46 Strategic Climate Fund 1 3 Contributions receivable at 31 December 27 49 Total contributions Clean Technology Fund 388 375 Strategic Climate Fund 29 26 Total contributions at 31 December 417 401 6. Loan investments Restated * 2016 2015 million million At 1 January 94 65 Disbursements 7 29 Repayments (1) (1) Day one fair value adjustment (Note 9) - (6) Unwinding discount (loan interest) 3 3 Foreign exchange movements 1 4 At 31 December 104 94 Impairment at 31 December (18) (14) Total loan investments net of impairment at 31 December 86 80 16

7. Provision for impairment of loan investments Restated * 2016 2015 (Release)/Charge for the year million million Portfolio provisions for the unidentified impairment of loan investments - 5 Specific provisions for the identified impairment of loan investments (4) (13) Impairment charge on loan investments (4) (8) Movement in provisions At I January (14) (6) Release for the year to the income statement - 5 Impairment charge on loan investments (4) (13) At 31 December (18) (14) Analysed between Portfolio provisions for the unidentified impairment of loan investments (2) (2) Specific provisions for the identified impairment of loan investments (16) (12) At 31 December (18) (14) 8. Other financial liabilities Other financial liabilities include income reimbursable to contributors of 1.2 million (2015: 2.0 million), disbursements for technical cooperation payable of 0.9 million (2015: 0.7 million) and expenses payable of 1.3 million (2015: 0.3 million). 9. Concessional loan discount 2016 2015 million million Day one fair value 4 15 Net loan discount movement 4 15 2016 2015 million million At 1 January 26 17 Day one fair value adjustment 4 15 Derecognition of liability on loan disbursement - (6) At 31 December 30 26 10. Analysis of current and non-current assets and liabilities The table below provides the classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities in the balance sheet. Restated * Restated * Restated * Current Non-current Total Current Non-current Total 2016 2016 2016 2015 2015 2015 Assets million million million million million million Placements with credit institutions 224-224 201-201 Contributions receivable 27-27 49-49 Loans 3 101 104 1 93 94 Provisions for impairment (18) - (18) (14) - (14) Total assets 236 101 337 237 93 330 Liabilities Other financial liabilities (3) - (3) (3) - (3) Concessional loan discount (30) - (30) (26) - (26) Total contributors' resources (304) - (304) (301) - (301) Total liabilities (337) - (337) (330) - (330) 17

11. Fair value of financial assets and liabilities The carrying amounts of financial assets and liabilities presented on the balance sheet approximate to their fair value. 12. Events after the reporting period There have been no material events since the reporting date that would require disclosure or adjustment to these financial statements. 13. Related parties The Fund s related parties are the Bank and the contributors. Fees are paid to the Bank based on budgeted expenditure as approved by the Trustee for the CIF. During 2016 the Bank incurred 1.0 million of reimbursable expenses on behalf of the Fund (2015: 1.5 million), of which 0.9 million remain payable at year end (2015: 0.3 million). Included in this amount are audit fees of 12,500 (2015: 14,400). Audit fees totalling 26,800 remain payable to the Bank at year end. In 2014 the Bank approved an extension of the term of appointment from four year to five with a maximum of two consecutive terms. Deloitte LLP (UK) completed its first four year term in 2014 and has been re-appointed for the five year period 2015 2019. The fall in the fee for the audit paid to the Fund s external auditor from 2015 to 2016 is attributable to movements in the value of pound sterling. The pound sterling equivalent of these fees was 10,800 (2015: 10,700) Contributions received and receivable from the contributors are outlined in note 5. During 2016, income of 2.5 million was reimbursed to the contributors (2015: 1.5 million). The amounts refundable at the end of the year are disclosed in note 8. 18

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT TO THE GOVERNORS OF THE EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT ( THE BANK ) Report on the financial statements Opinion We have audited the financial statements of the EBRD CIF Special Fund ( the Fund ) for the year ended 31 December 2016 which comprise the income statement, the statement of comprehensive income, the balance sheet, the statement of changes in contributors resources, the statement of cash flows, the accounting policies, the risk management statement and the related notes 1 to 13. In our opinion the Financial Statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the EBRD CIF Special Fund as at 31 December 2016 and its financial performance and cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Basis for Opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Fund in accordance with the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (IESBA Code) together the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the United Kingdom, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. President s responsibility for the financial statements The President is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the Financial Statements in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and for such internal control as the President determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the financial statements, the President is responsible for assessing the Fund s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Fund or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so. The President is responsible for overseeing the Fund s financial reporting process. Auditor s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements. As part of an audit in accordance with ISAs, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also: Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control. Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by the President. 19