Business Case for Using a Numbered Logarithmic Risk Severity Scale. Don Swallom U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command Redstone Arsenal, Alabama

Similar documents
The Business Case for Using a Numbered Logarithmic Risk Severity Scale. Donald W. Swallom. U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command

Using Risk Modeling, Analysis, and Assessment to Inform Homeland Security Policy and Strategy

BY Sri D. K. Goswami OIL INDIA LIMITED

Introduction to Disaster Management

Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board (DDESB)

Prerequisites for EOP Creation: Hazard Identification and Assessment

16985 ESOH Risk Assessment and Acceptance The Basics

A Multihazard Approach to Building Safety: Using FEMA Publication 452 as a Mitigation Tool

Southwest Florida Healthcare Coalition

REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA

The Challenges of a Quantitative Approach to Risk Assessment

A Practical Framework for Assessing Emerging Risks

A concept of accident causation

SMALL BUSINESS. Guide to Business. Continuity Planning. Ensure your business continues to operate in the event of a disruption.

FACILITY NAME. CONSIDERATIONS FOR COMPLETING THE ANALYSIS FORMS The following instructions were modified from the Kaiser Permanente HVA tool

Emergency Resilience Risk Assessment

Japanese Government General Indemnity Contract (English translation)

Multi-Hazard Risk Management Project The Smithsonian Institution (SI)

GUIDE BUSINESS & INDUSTRY A STEP-BY-STEP APPROACH TO EMERGENCY PLANNING, RESPONSE AND RECOVERY FOR COMPANIES OF ALL SIZES

Korean Disaster Management : Current Status and New Challenges. M. Jae Moon Yonsei University Department of Administration Korea

Risk Assessment Workshop Pam Walaski, CSP, CHMM Director, Health and Safety GAI Consultants, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA

Programmatic ESOH Evaluation DoD Requirements & Expectations

ASPECTS REGARDING THE QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF RISKS DUE TO THE OCCURRENCE OF LOW PROBABILITY AND VERY HIGH IMPACT EVENTS

Methodology Overview. Dr. Andrew Coburn. Director of Advisory Board of Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies and Senior Vice President of RMS Inc.

STATE AND LOCAL MITIGATION PLANNING how-to guide

Introduction to the Disaster Risk Profile of Chittagong

Business Continuity Plan. The 12 Steps Model. Business Continuity Plan. Emergency Contingency Crisis Castastrophe Disaster.

2. Hazards and risks 2. HAZARDS AND RISKS. Summary

Regional Healthcare Hazard Vulnerability Assessment

Assessing Risk: Shifting Focus from Hazards to Capabilities. Jane Coolidge Kara Walker CMRHCC April 2017

LOGISTICS ASSISTANCE REPRESENTATIVES

RISK AND OPPORTUNITY ASSESSMENT GUIDE RISK CRITERIA

GUIDELINE ACTIVITY RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE

The Mississippi State Department of Health EOPs and HVAs Presented By: Lillie Bailey

@ - Presentation Caveat

Hazard Vulnerability Assessment for Long Term Care Facilities

AFTERMATH OUTBREAK. Contingency Planning to Sustain Critical Operations During Large Scale Disasters and Catastrophic Events

LAND-USE PLANNING REGULATIONS IN FRANCE AFTER THE TOULOUSE DISASTER

Catastrophe Risk Engineering Solutions

Risk Acceptability (Tolerability) in System Safety: Concepts and Methodology

7.0 RISK MANAGEMENT. Table of Contents

GUIDELINE ACTIVITY RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE. Purpose

Benefits of Improving Infrastructure Resilience

Table 2: CONDITIONS AND TRIGGERS (Either 1 of the listed triggers / conditions) WHITE ALERT BLUE ALERT RED ALERT. Result of the conduct of PDRA

HAZARD MANAGEMENT POLICY Page 1 of 7 Reviewed: October 2018

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

MODULE 1 MODULE 1. Risk Management. Session 1: Common Terminology. Session 2: Risk Assessment Process

Disaster in SDGs. - How can we measure? Youngmi Lee (Statistical Research Institute) Honggyu Sohn (Yonsei Univ.)

DRAFT Revised Guide to the National CDEM Plan 2015 July 2015

19 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters

Terrorism Risk Insurance in Australia

Modeling Extreme Event Risk

2. Hazards and risks. 2 HAZARDS AND RISKS p1

Towards Sustainable Mining Crisis Management and Communications Planning Protocol

A RISK BASED MODEL FOR DETERMINATION OF INHABITED BUILDING DISTANCE SITING CRITERIA

STCW 78: Manila Amendments and Some Risk Assessment Aspects

IVANS 2008 XCHANGE CONFERENCE Key Communications Issues Facing the Property/Casualty Insurance Industry in 2008

Introduction to Life Cycle Risk Management Glossary

Protect the Force through RISK MANAGEMENT LEADERS SAVE LIVES

EvCC Emergency Management Plan ANNEX #11 Hazard Assessment

Dilemmas in risk assessment

CMP for Special Regs and Safety Issues. 1. INTRODUCTION Purpose Scope Submissions to Australian Sailing:...

Risk Management & FMEAs. By Jay P. Patel, ASQ Fellow CEO & President QPS Institute

Recommendations Concerning the Terrorism Section of A.M. Best s Supplemental Rating Questionnaire. February 20, 2004

EXTRACT FROM GJENERAL CONDITIONS OF LIFE INSURANCE WITH SAVINGS CONTRACT

Investigation of NATO Nation Aircraft or Missile Accidents and Incidents

Effective Workplace Incident Investigations SERGE SIROIS, INVESTIGATION OFFICER WORKSAFE NB

Natural Hazards Risks in Kentucky. KAMM Regional Training

ACME AMAZIUM REFINERY: ALL HAZARDS PERFORMANCE PROFILE (PARTICIPANT GUIDE)

Risk assessments of contemporary accidents in construction industry

Executive Summary. Introduction and Purpose. Scope

LifeMap Assurance Company PLUS PROGRAM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Managing the Impact of Weather & Natural Hazards. Council Best Practice natural hazard preparedness

COMMUNITY SUMMARY LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF CENTRAL CITY

COMMUNITY SUMMARY LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF LISBON

ImpCom Ticket Package/Experience and Ticket Reimbursement Program Including Participant Non-Appearance

Disaster Recovery Planning: Preparation is Key to Survival

2a) Identifying and counting disaster occurrences and magnitude

OF CLIMATE CHANGE. Kim Knowlton, DrPH. Assistant Clinical Professor, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University

South Lincolnshire NHS Clinical Commissioning Group Business Continuity Policy

Property business interruption (technology) Policy wording

REPORT ON DISASTER RISK ASSESSMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA FOR THE PERIOD

Sensitivity Analyses: Capturing the. Introduction. Conceptualizing Uncertainty. By Kunal Joarder, PhD, and Adam Champion

Risk Assessment Planning Team Meeting April 5, 2016

Risk Management Framework. Metallica Minerals Ltd

Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Control Procedure

ITEM 9 STAFF REPORT. TO: Mayor and City Council. FROM: Tom Welch, Interim Fire Chief. SUBJECT: City ofmill Valley All-Hazard Mitigation Plan

I would like to thank the following organizations for sponsoring the course, which allows their employees/members to have the registration fee waived:

Property business interruption Policy wording

ARMS The enabler to understanding Risk

WHS Risk Assessment and Control Form

NATURAL DISASTER RESPONSE

For Producer Use Only

Travel Assistance. Security That Travels With You. Standard Insurance Company

Hazard Mitigation Planning

Travel Assistance. Security That Travels With You. Standard Insurance Company The Standard Life Insurance Company of New York

CASUALTY ANALYSIS PROCEDURE (document FSI 17/WP.1, annex 2)

IBTTA Facilities Management and Maintenance Workshop October 23-25, 2011 Nashville, TN Ray Szczucki ACE USA Inland Marine ACE USA

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF LARGE-SCALE CATASTROPHES IN THE PHILIPPINES

Risk Control and Opportunity Realization

Transcription:

Business Case for Using a Numbered Logarithmic Risk Severity Scale Don Swallom U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command Redstone Arsenal, Alabama 1

Caveat Opinions expressed are those of the author and not the coordinated position of AMCOM, Army Materiel Command, the US Army or the Department of Defense. But maybe they should be. 2

Business Case Executive Summary (Abstract) Introduction Problem Background Scope (4 arenas) Desired Outcomes (4) Alternatives to be Analyzed (2) Analysis of Alternatives Conclusion Recommendation 3

Executive Summary DoDI 6055.07 - actual accidents; MIL-STD-882 - potential accidents High dollar & fatality loss Not adequate Top Threshold for damage loss increased, 6055.07 to $2 million Both up from $1 million 882 to $10 million Threshold for highest injury class remains 1 fatality Systems exceed these values by up to three orders of magnitude Solution: Numbered logarithmic severity scale similar to the Richter Scale Improve the risk management of accidents Enhance DOD operational risk management Deals with National Threats (Presidential Policy Directive 8) Deals with Global threats 4

DoD s Accident Classification Structure DoD Instruction 6055.07 Class A mishap. The resulting total cost of damages to Government and other property is $2 million or more, a DoD aircraft is destroyed (excluding UAS Groups 1, 2, or 3), or an injury or occupational illness results in a fatality or permanent total disability. Class B mishap. The resulting total cost of damages to Government and other property is $500,000 or more, but less than $2 million. An injury or occupational illness results in permanent partial disability, or when three or more personnel are hospitalized for inpatient care (which, for mishap reporting purposes only, does not include just observation or diagnostic care) as a result of a single mishap. Class C mishap. The resulting total cost of property damages to Government and other property is $50,000 or more, but less than $500,000; or a nonfatal injury or illness that results in 1 or more days away from work, not including the day of the injury. Class D mishap. The resulting total cost of property damage is $20,000 or more, but less than $50,000; or a recordable injury or illness not otherwise classified as a Class A, B, or C mishap. 5

MIL-STD-882E Severity Categories Description Severity Category Catastrophic 1 Critical 2 Marginal 3 Negligible 4 Mishap Result Criteria Could result in one or more of the following: death, permanent total disability, irreversible significant environmental impact, or monetary loss equal to or exceeding $10M. Could result in one or more of the following: permanent partial disability, injuries or occupational illness that may result in hospitalization of at least three personnel, reversible significant environmental impact, or monetary loss equal to or exceeding $1M but less than $10M. Could result in one or more of the following: injury or occupational illness resulting in one or more lost work day(s), reversible moderate environmental impact, or monetary loss equal to or exceeding $100K but less than $1M. Could result in one or more of the following: injury or occupational illness not resulting in a lost work day, minimal environmental impact, or monetary loss less than $100K. 6

$14,000 $13,000 $12,800 $12,000 $11,000 System Costs versus Top Severity Threholds $ Millions $10,000 $9,000 $8,000 $7,000 $6,000 $6,200 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,400 $1,000 $0 Ford Class Carrier Nimitz Class Carrier $202 $147 $10 $2 B-2 C-17 F-22 MIL-STD-882E Severity 1 Threshold DODI 6055.7 Class A Threshold 7

6,000 5,680 5,000 4,000 4,660 System Personnel versus Top Severity Threholds 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 Ford Class Carrier Nimitz Class Carrier MIL-STD-882E Severity 1 Threshold 1 1 DODI 6055.7 Class A Threshold 8

Background Class A Accident 2009 $2 million 1989 $1 million $500,000 9

Accident Class Before 882D Accident Class Now 882E A 1 A 7 1 6 B C D $1M $200K $20K $2K 1 Fatal $1M 1 Fatal 2 3 4 $200K $10K $2K B C D $2M $500K $50K $20K 1 Fatal 2 3 4 $10M 1 Fatal $1M $100K 10

Attributes of a good risk assessment matrix Severity scale covers full range of possible outcomes Probability calibrated with reference to an exposure interval Equally proportioned, logarithmic scales (1, 10, 100, 1000 ) Cartesian Orientation Increase up and to the right Risk levels assigned to cells consistent with contours of equal risk (iso-risk contours) Sufficient probability or frequency categories so highest severity level can be assessed at the PM level of risk if the probability or frequency of occurrence is low enough A risk assessment code for hazards whose risk has been eliminated Easily tailored with reporting of risk consistent with other systems within the family of systems. 11

A common mishap risk assessment matrix for DoD aircraft systems. 12

Proposed DOD Matrix Severity Frequency A >100 B >10 C >1 D >0.1 E >0.01 F >0.001 G >0.0001 H >0.00001 I > 0.000001 J 0.000001 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 $2k $20k $200k $2M $20M $200M $2B $20B Injury, no lost work day Lost Work Day Permanent partial disability Low SSWG/Principal for Safety 1 Fatality Medium - PM 10 Fatalities Serious - PEO 100 Fatalities High - CAE 1,000 Fatalities Prohibitive SECDEF 10,000 Fatalities 13

Severity End of Life on Planet Earth 13 $2Q Cataclysmic12 $200T TBD 11 $20T TBD 10 $2T TBD 9 $200B Disastrous 8 $20B Catastrophic 7 $2B Catastrophic 6 $200M Catastrophic 5 $20M Catastrophic 4 $2M Critical 3 $200K Marginal 2 $20K Negligible $2K 1 TBD N 1B Fatal 100M Fatal 10M Fatal 1M Fatal 100K Fatal 10K Fatal 1K Fatal 100 Fatal 10 Fatal 1 Fatal 1E-11 TBD M 1E-10 Hazard Frequency (Mishaps per 100,000 Hrs (11.4 years)) TBD L 1E-9 TBD K 1E-8 Low TBD J Super Incredibly Extremely Very Improbable Improbable Improbable Improbable Improbable 1E-7 I 1E-6 H 0.00001 G F Earth encounter with an asteroid Medium Serious High E Remote D Occasional C Probable B 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 B-2 F-22, C-17 AH-64, CH-47, UH-60 C-12, OH-58D Frequent A Small Unmanned Air Vehicles 14

Arenas Scope DoD Accident Classification and System Safety Risk Assessment DOD Operational Risk Management National Preparedness Global Preparedness 15

DA Pam 385-30 Standardized Army risk matrix Probability Severity Frequent A Likely B Occasional C Seldom D Unlikely E Catastrophic I E (1) E (1) H (2) H (2) M (3) Critical II E (1) H (2) H (2) M (3) L (4) Marginal III H (2) M (3) M (3) L (4) L (5) Negligible IV M (3) L (4) L (4) L (5) L (5) 16

DA Pam 385 30 Risk acceptance matrix Duration of risk Category of risk 1 month or less Greater than 1 month, less than 1 year Greater than 1 year, less than 5 years Permanent or greater than 5 years Chartered system development programs Extremely high risk General officer MSC CG General officer Army Headquarters CG ASA(I&E) Component Acquisition Executive (CAE) High risk Moderate risk Brigade CO or responsible O-6 Battalion CO 1 or responsible O-5 General officer 1 MSC CG General officer Brigade CO 1 or responsible O-6 General officer 1 Army Headquarters CG General officer 1 Program Executive Officer (PEO) Program manager Low risk Company CO 2 or responsible O-3 Battalion CO 2 or responsible O-5 Brigade CO 1 or responsible O-6 Brigade CO 1 or responsible O-6 Program manager Tolerable risk Not required Not required Not required Not required Not required 17

U.S. Army Operational Units 18

19

Aircraft Hangars at Clark Air Base Destroyed by Ashfall 20

Mt Rainier & Joint Base Lewis-McChord Joint Base Lewis- McChord 21

Strategic National Risk Assessment (SNRA) (2011) National-Level Events Threat/ Hazard Group Natural Technological/ Accidental Adversarial/ Human- Caused Threat/Hazard Type Animal Disease Outbreak Earthquake Flood Human Pandemic Outbreak Hurricane Space Weather Tsunami Volcanic Eruption Wildfire Biological Food Contamination Chemical Substance Spill or Release Dam Failure Radiological Substance Release Aircraft as a Weapon Armed Assault Biological Terrorism Attack (non-food) Chemical/Biological Food Contamination Terrorism Attack Chemical Terrorism Attack (non-food) Cyber Attack against Data Cyber Attack against Physical Infrastructure Explosives Terrorism Attack Nuclear Terrorism Attack Radiological Terrorism Attack 22

Global Hazards 23

Global Hazards* Extreme Climate Change Nuclear War Global Pandemic Ecological Catastrophe Global System Collapse Major Asteroid Impact Super-volcano Synthetic Biology Nanotechnology Artificial Intelligence Unknown Consequences Future Bad Global Governance *Global Challenges Twelve risks that threaten human civilisation The case for a new category of risks (February 2015, Global Challenges Foundation) 24

Desired Outcomes 1. Must support DoD policy regarding the investigation of mishaps and the assessment of environmental, safety, and occupational health hazards for DoD systems 2. Must be a useful tool to all levels of DoD leadership in employing risk management for the full range of DoD operations 3. Must be useful in support of national preparedness to include managing the risk of all 23 "National-Level Events" 4. Must be useful in support of global preparedness. 25

Alternatives 1 Keep the Status Quo Accident classes A, B, C, D Severity categories 1, 2, 3, 4 Increase opposite increasing severity Adjust thresholds every 10 to 20 years Small Incremental Changes 26

Alternative 2 Number severity scales increasing in same direction as increasing severity Start numbering with Severity Category 1 for the lowest range of severity Add one severity category for each 10 fold increase in severity Add categories until full range of potential loss is covered for a specific system. Do this for dollar value of damage and for injuries and fatalities Eliminate one-word labels (Catastrophic, Critical, Marginal, Negligible) 27

Accident Class A B C D Alternative 1 Alternative 2 $2M $500K $50K $20K 1 Fatal 882E 7 1 6 2 3 4 $10M $1M $100K 1 Fatal 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 $2Q $200T $20T $2T $200B $20B $2B $200M $20M $2M $200K $20K $2K 1B Fatal 100M Fatal 10M Fatal 1M Fatal 100K Fatal 10K Fatal 1K Fatal 100 Fatal 10 Fatal 1 Fatal 28

Analysis of Alternative 1 1 Class A Accident Did not increase the Class A rate much $1,400,000,000 ($1.4 billion) Increased the Air Force dollar-loss to Class A's by a lot 13 August 2016 29 29

Nimitz Class Aircraft Carrier $4.5 Billion 5,680 Personnel Alternative 1 Severity 1 Class A Severity 1 Class A Severity 1 Class A 30

Nimitz Class Aircraft Carrier $4.5 Billion 5,680 Personnel Alternative 882E 2 Severity 5 Severity 7 Severity 4 31

Mother of All Risk Assessment Matrices (Spaceship Earth) Hazard Severity Frequency (Mishaps per 100,000 Hrs (11.4 years)) A B C D E F G H I J K L M N 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 0.00001 1E-6 1E-7 1E-8 1E-9 1E-10 1E-11 $2K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 $20K $200K $2M $20M $200M $2B $20B $200B $2T $20T $200T $2Q 1 10 100 1K 10K 100K 1M 10M 100M 1B Low Medium Serious High Prohibitive Earth encounter with an asteroid 32

Short Term Cost is the same Cost Update publications Update procedures Update database reports Long Term Alternative 2 requires no further changes except corrections for inflation which can be automated 33

Benefits Alternative 1 None Alternative 2 Improved comprehension of the significance of all actual or potential high-loss events For leadership For the public Just as with the Richter scale for earthquakes 34

Severity Categories of Big Events Severity 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 $2Q $200T $20T $2T $200B $20B $2B $200M $20M $2M $200K $20K $2K 1B Fatal 100M Fatal 10M Fatal 1M Fatal 100K Fatal 10K Fatal 1K Fatal 100 Fatal 10 Fatal 1 Fatal Earth encounter with an asteroid 7 billion Deaths to Small Pox in 20th Century - 300 million World War II 60 million World War I 9 million 1931 Yellow River flood 1-4 million American Civil War - 970,000 1970 Bhola cyclone - 500,000+ 1938 Yellow River flood - 500,000+ 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami - 280,000 2011 Tōhoku earthquake-tsunami $300 billion Property Loss Huricane Katrina - $82 million 2011 Tōhoku earthquake-tsunami 15,828 dead, 3,760 Missing 35

Severity of Historical Events Based on Fatalities Severity 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 $2Q $200T $20T $2T $200B $20B $2B $200M $20M $2M $200K $20K $2K 1B Fatal 100M Fatal 10M Fatal 1M Fatal 100K Fatal 10K Fatal 1K Fatal 100 Fatal 10 Fatal 1 Fatal Wars 9 15 43 25 Battles 6 42 84 Numbers of events in each category Maritime 10 141 Aviation 161 Accidents Source: List of wars and disasters by death toll http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/most_lethal_wars_in_world_history Source: List of accidents and disasters by death toll http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/list_of_accidents_and_disasters_by_death_toll 36

Conclusion Current severity scales used in DODI 6055.07 and MIL- STD-882E are not structured to deal with the large costs of DoD systems. Top thresholds too low. Current reversed letters and numbers make it difficult to adjust the scales to reflect cost realities of present and future systems. A logarithmic risk severity scale numbered to increase in the same direction as increasing severity can be used for the full range of environmental, safety and occupational health risk management challenges to include global worst case scenarios for the full range of natural and man-made disasters. 37

Recommendation Begin the transition to the new scale Develop reports and risk assessments based on existing accident and other disastrous event data. This will help to educate today's environmental, safety and occupational health risk management personnel and others dealing with these kinds of events on the utility of this tool. It will also help calibrate the thinking of all government leaders on the meaning of risk assessment in the same way that the Richter Scale helped the scientific community and general public of the 1930s to comprehend the nature of earthquake severity data. 38

Questions? Deep Impact Don Swallom Safety Engineer AMCOM Safety Office Aviation System Safety Division (256) 842-8641 donald.w.swallom.civ@mail.mil 39