Q. How is the percentage used to determine proportionality calculated?

Similar documents
LCAP Technical Assistance Navigating the New Template

LCAP / Supplemental and Concentration Regulations

BY: Teresa Hyden Cynthia Glover Woods Chief Business Official Chief Academic Officer (951) (951)

2016 CASBO Annual Conference LCAP Proportionality and Compliance Performance. Presented By: Jannelle Kubinec

BY: Teresa Hyden Diana Asseier Chief Business Official Chief Academic Officer (951) (951)

FCMAT LCFF Calculator

LCFF LCAP. Local Control Accountability Plan

January 18, 2019 and February 1,

Governor s Budget Proposals for

UNDERSTANDING SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGETS

Evergreen School District

RE: Local Control Accountability Plans and Adopted Budget Fiscal Year

From: Wendy Benkert, Ed.D. Associate Superintendent, Business Services Budget Advisory Based on the Enacted State Budget

Useful Tips and Tricks to Understand the Principal Apportionment

2016/17 Budget Development Presentation #1. Board of Trustees Meeting February 9, 2016

HERMOSA BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT JUNE 30, 2014

RE: Local Control Accountability Plans and Adopted Budget Fiscal Year

Executive Summary Second Interim Budget Assumptions Duane Wolgamott, Chief Business Officer Laura Becker, Director of Fiscal Services

Solana Beach School District

CSBA Business Partners & Affiliates School Finance Insights. February 28, 2017

OFFICE OF EDUCATION 1111 LAS GALLINAS AVENUE/P.O. BOX 4925 MARY JANE BURKE (415) SAN RAFAEL, CA MARIN COUNTY FAX (415)

CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD AGENDA ITEM. (3) Certify District's Financial Status for Fiscal Year

A CDE Overview: Current Issues in School Finance. California Association of School Business Officials 2017 Annual Conference April 14, 2017

Fiscal Health Risk Analysis Key Fiscal Indicators for K-12 Districts

Basics of the Principal Apportionment

March 31, Dr. Michael Kirst, State Board President State Board of Education 1430 N Street, Room 5111 Sacramento, CA 95814

Agenda Item B-18. Governor s 2019/20 Proposed State Budget

Budgeting Basics- Pt. 1. Interpreting the Interim Budgets and Multi-Year Projections

SOLEDAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT JUNE 30, 2015

TAMALPAIS UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Adopted Budget Report and Multiyear Fiscal Projection

CSBA Sample Administrative Regulation

West Contra Costa Unified School District

VENTURA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT VENTURA COUNTY

Twin Rivers Unified School District 2018/19 ADOPTED BUDGET

DOS PALOS-ORO LOMA JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT JUNE 30, 2016

AUBURN UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT Auburn, California. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2014

Enrique S. Camarena, Joseph Casillas, EastLake, Parkview, and Rosebank Elementary Schools. Presentation to the Board of Education March 7, 2018

PROPOSED BUDGET. Regular Board Meeting June 16, 2015

Budget Update. originally presented at the 2016 School Planning Retreat on Feb. 20, 2016

Based on most current budget data and actual expenditures through October 31, 2017

NOVATO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. March 25, Presented by: Karen Maloney, CFO

BONITA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AUDIT REPORT For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2017

Managing Your OPEB & Other Benefit Liabilities

SOLEDAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT JUNE 30, 2016

Santa Clara County Office of Education Countywide CBO Meeting

AUBURN UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2016

Millbrae Elementary School District First Interim for Fiscal Year Board of Trustees

OJAI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Public Education Funding: How Did We Get Here and Where Are We Headed?

PROPOSED BUDGET

Budget Study Session 2012/13, 2013/14, and 2014/15. Business Services Division January 22, 2013

SAN LEANDRO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT JUNE 30, 2016

WASHINGTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT West Sacramento, California. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2015

State Budget Message

First Interim Budget

NATOMAS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2016

NATOMAS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2017

Enclosed is one (1) copy of the annual report of Meridian Elementary School District for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016.

Fruitvale School District

First Interim Budget

B U D G E T A D O P T I O N

BURTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT JUNE 30, 2016

NATOMAS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Sacramento, California. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2014

CULVER CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

DOS PALOS-ORO LOMA JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT JUNE 30, 2015

Irvine Unified School District

TULARE COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2016

Kernville Union School District

STOCKTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Stockton, California. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2014

Budget Planning

MARK TWAIN UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2017

2016/17 Budget Proposal June 20, 2016

CENTRAL UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT COUNTY OF IMPERIAL EL CENTRO, CALIFORNIA AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2018

Yancy Hawkins, Assistant Superintendent - Business & Operations Nancy Walker, Director of Fiscal Services

Budget Adoption

Don Craig. Local Control Funding Formula

MARK TWAIN UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2018

ADOPTED BUDGET (RECOMMENDED)

Budget Forum

Dean West, CPA Associate Superintendent, Business Services Second Interim Budget Advisory

SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Sacramento, California. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2013

Sources: School Services of California, Inc., KCSOS, Dave Walrath, and Michael Hulsizer

Allocation Plan

Orange Unified School District (C) Copyright March 2018 All Rights Reserved

SCHOOLS OF SONOMA COUNTY

COLD SPRING SCHOOL DISTRICT

Year End Financial Report

FCMAT. Chief Executive Officer Joel 0. Montero

Audit Guide Update

AB 1200 INTERACTIONS WITH DISTRICTS

Charter School State Funding. Alexis Schauss, Director of School Business NC Department of Public Instruction February 22, 2018

SAN LEANDRO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT JUNE 30, 2018

EL DORADO COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2017

ESPARTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COUNTY OF YOLO ESPARTO, CALIFORNIA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT JUNE 30, 2014

MERCED COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT JUNE 30, 2015

LAKESIDE UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO LAKESIDE, CALIFORNIA AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2016

Irvine Unified School District First Interim Report. Presented by John Fogarty December 12, 2017

FONTANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AUDIT REPORT For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2013

2016/2017 SECOND INTERIM REPORT

FULLERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT AUDIT REPORT For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014

Transcription:

Overview of LCFF Regulations On January 16 th the State Board of Education (SBE) approved Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) spending regulations and the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) template. There remain many questions around LCFF. Here are some answers regarding the recently approved regulations and LCAP. Spending Regulations Q. Do local educational agencies (i.e., school districts, charter schools, and county offices of education [LEA]) need to follow specific rules when using LCFF supplemental and/or concentration funding? A. Yes, the LCFF statutes (California Education Code Section 42238.07) directed the SBE to develop and approve spending regulations that provide direction to LEAs regarding how to demonstrate that they will increase or improve services for unduplicated pupils (i.e., low income, foster youth, and English learners) in proportion to the additional LCFF funding generated by these students. The regulations adopted by the SBE provide a calculation that LEAs shall use to determine a proportionality percentage. LEAs are expected to describe within their LCAP how they will meet this percentage of increase or improve services for unduplicated students over what is provided for all students using qualitative and/or quantitative measures. This is a snapshot of services that an LEA is providing in a given year. Q. How is the percentage used to determine proportionality calculated? A. The SBE s regulations detail a standard methodology for calculating the percentage in Title 5, California Code of Regulations, Section 15496 (a). Essentially each LEA shall divide their supplemental and concentration grant amount by the base LCFF grant amount. In the transition years, before the LCFF is fully funded statewide, the regulations include a standard methodology for determining how much supplemental and concentration grant funds are received in a given year by an LEA for purposes of this calculation. LEAs will explain these calculations in their LCAPs. See attachment 4 of the SBE Item 20 (January 15-16 meeting) for an example of this calculation (http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/ag/ag/yr14/documents/jan14item20a4.doc). Q. In step 1 of the formula, is the LCFF target the estimate of an LEA s LCFF target in the LCAP year or at full implementation in 2020-21? In step 1, the LEA is estimating its supplemental and concentration grant funding target for the LCAP year. (The phrase target as of the LCAP year means the amount of funding the LEA would receive if LCFF were fully funded in the LCAP year). This means that for 2014-15, step 1 would require the LEA to estimate the amount of

supplemental and concentration grant funding it would receive in 2014-15 if the LCFF was fully implemented statewide in 2014-15. This is consistent with the way the state is defining and calculating the LCFF funding gap each year. Q. Can an LEA spend or provide more services in a given year than the calculated proportionality percentage. A. Yes. The calculated proportionality percentage is meant to serve as a minimum threshold and should not be interpreted as a limit to the level of investment made to support unduplicated pupils. An important tenet of LCFF is that local needs should drive decisions with special attention to students in need (i.e., unduplicated pupils). Q. The proportionality percentage calculation refers to a percentage calculated by the Department of Finance representing progress towards closing the LCFF funding gap. What is this number and where can it be found? A. This LCFF funding gap percentage ([Title 5, California Code of Regulations, Section 15496 (a)] referenced in step 4 of the proportionality calculation) reflects the statewide progress made to fully fund the LCFF targets. The Department of Finance will calculate this percentage and include it with information published as part of the state budget process. For the purposes of the proportionality calculation, the gap percentage used should be the cumulative percent of progress made towards the LCFF funding targets. For instance, in 2013-14 the estimated amount of progress to fund the LCFF funding target was approximately 11.8%. Based on the Governor s proposed budget, the 2014-15 value would be approximately 28%. Q. Can supplemental and concentration funds be spent on a districtwide or schoolwide basis, or must they be targeted? A. The regulations include a section (Title 5, California Code of Regulations, Section 15496 (b)) that allows supplemental and concentration grant funds to be used for districtwide, schoolwide, countywide, and charterwide purposes and still count towards meeting the proportionality percentage under certain conditions. An LEA that plans to use supplemental or concentration funds for schoolwide, districtwide, countywide, or charterwide purposes must identify these expenditures in the LCAP and describe how the funded services are directed towards meeting the LEA s goals for its low-income pupils, English Learners, and foster youth in the state priority areas. If a school district plans to provide districtwide services in a district where low-income pupils, English Learners, and foster youth account for less than 55 percent of enrollment or schoolwide services in a school where low-income pupils, English Learners, and foster youth account for less than 40 percent of enrollment, the district must additionally describe how the services provided are the most effective use of funds to meet the

district s goals for low-income pupils, English Learners, and foster youth in the state priority areas. Q. When do the LCFF spending regulations go into effect? A. The SBE action approved emergency regulations which are currently undergoing review by the Office of Administrative Law and should go into effect early February 2014. These new regulations should be followed by LEAs as they prepare for their 2014-15 budget and LCAP adoption process. LCAP Template Regulations Q. Who must have an LCAP? A. All LEAs school districts, charter schools, and county offices of education are required to develop an LCAP. Q. Does the LCAP require a school district to complete a separate LCAP for each school site within a district? A. No, a school district is required to complete one LCAP for the district, though districts may choose to complete school level LCAPs if they wish. The template requires that the district s LCAP includes goals and specific actions to achieve those goals for the school district, each school site within the district, all pupils, and each subgroup of pupils. As part of the LCAP district engagement and adoption process, districts are expected to discuss appropriate goals for each school site and to ensure that those goals are aligned to other school plans, such as the Single Plan for School Achievement. As the school district completes the LCAP, it may identify which school sites and subgroups have the same goals/actions and group and describe those goals together. Q. When is the LCAP required and how often will it need to be updated? A. All LEAs must have an LCAP in place before the final approval of their budget for 2014-15. Thereafter, LEAs are expected to annually update their LCAP prior to their annual budget approval. Q. Do we include Annual Update information for the 2014-15 LCAP? A. No. The first year of the LCAP will not include Annual Update information (e.g., analysis of progress, review of actions/services). The first year when such information will be included will be with the 2015-16 LCAP cycle.

Q. Can the LCAP template be reformatted (e.g., larger sized paper, reconfigure shape of boxes or areas for text)? A. Yes, but all required information must be included within each section of the LCAP. LEAs may resize pages or attach additional pages as necessary to facilitate completion of the LCAP. Q. Is there an online template for the LCAP? A. Not at this point, but one will be available as soon as possible. The initial version of the LCAP is a Word document that can be downloaded and completed. Q. How is the LCAP template linked to the expenditure regulations? A. The LCAP template (Title 5, California Code of Regulations, Section 15497) includes Section 3(C) and Section 3(D) that specifically link to and provide space for the LEA to detail the use of LCFF supplemental and concentration grant funds, provide additional information required for the use of these funds in a schoolwide, districtwide, countywide, or charterwide manner, and finally to detail how the LEA meets the proportionality requirement calculated in the expenditure regulations. Q. Do all expenditures of LCFF funding need to be listed and described in the LCAP? A. The LCAP must list and describe all expenditures implementing the specific actions being taken to achieve the goals included in the LCAP. The state priorities broadly cover what an LEA does to support their students and achieve outcomes; therefore, almost all LEA expenditures will likely be listed and described as a consequence of being tied to the actions that support LEA goals around the state priorities. Also, considering that an important objective of LCFF is to support increased budget transparency, LEAs should carefully consider how to reflect the services and related expenses for their basic instructional program in relationship to the state priorities. There are some types of LCFF expenditures, which may not apply to the state priorities (e.g., debt service, general administration, post-employment benefits, etc.). In such cases, that expenditure would not need to be included in the LCAP. Other Information Q. What continuing opportunities do interested parties have to comment on the regulations and propose changes? A. The SBE adopted the emergency regulations and initiated the process for the permanent regulations at the SBE meeting on January 16 th.

The emergency regulations are currently under review by the Office of Administrative Law. Please refer to the Office of Administrative Law s website for technical information at: http://www.oal.ca.gov/emergency_regs.htm. Further information can also be found at: http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/ag/ag/yr14/documents/jan14item20a5.doc For the permanent regulations, interested parties may submit comments in writing or orally within 45 days after the proposed regulations have been submitted. CDE staff, on behalf of the SBE, will hold a public hearing at 10:00 a.m. on March 17, 2014, at 1430 N Street, Room 1101, Sacramento, California on the permanent regulations. At the hearing, any person may present statements or arguments, orally or in writing, relevant to the proposed action described in the Informative Digest. Please refer to Attachment 2 in Item 21 for more information. http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/ag/ag/yr14/agenda201401.asp Q. What are the next steps for LCFF implementation? A. SBE staff will continue to work with CDE on the expenditure regulations and LCAP template regulations in accordance with the permanent regulations process and will provide an update at each SBE meeting. The SBE has additional responsibilities relating to LCFF, including the adoption of evaluation rubrics by October 1, 2015. Staff will also work on providing additional resources on LCFF, the expenditure regulations, and the LCAP template for use in the field. Please refer to both the West Ed LCFF website at http://lcff.wested.org/ and the CDE LCFF website at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/index.asp for updates.