External Monitoring Report Project Number: 48402-001 (Jul - Dec 2016) PAK: National Motorway M-4 Gojra Shorkot Project Prepared by Abdul Hameed, External Monitoring Agent (EMA), National Highway Authority, Ministry of Communications, Government of Pakistan for the Asian Development Bank. This External Monitoring Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY Ministry of Communication Government of Pakistan National Trade Corridor Highway Investment Program ADB Loan No. 3300-PAK PAK: NATIONAL MOTORWAY M-4 GOJRA SHORKOT-KHANEWAL PROJECT External Monitoring Report of Implementation of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan Gojra Shorkot Section - II (58+100 120+268 = 62 km) February 2017 Prepared by: Abdul Hameed, External Monitoring Agent (EMA), National Highway Authority, Ministry of Communications, Government of Pakistan
Contents 1. Introduction... 1 1.1 Project Background... 1 1.2 Project Description... 1 2 EMA and Scope of Work... 3 2.1 Monitoring Methodology and Strategy... 3 2.1.1 Review of Project Information... 4 2.1.2 Field Visit... 4 2.1.3 Sampling... 4 2.1.4 Rapid Appraisal Methods... 4 2.1.5 Participative Approach... 4 2.1.6 Resettlement Monitoring Framework... 4 2.1.7 Monitoring Indicators... 5 2.1.8 Data Processing and Analysis... 6 2.1.9 Deliverables... 6 2.1.10 Workshop with NHA and ADB... 7 2.1.11 Work Plan... 7 2.2 Second Bi-Annual External Monitoring Report... 7 2.2.1 Field Visits... 7 2.2.2 Approach for Data Collection... 7 2.2.3 Types of Collected Data/Information... 8 3 Project Impacts and Status of Implementation... 8 3.1 Implementation Analysis... 12 3.2 Land Compensation and Factors Responsible for Delay... 12 3.3 Meager Amount of Land Payment:... 13 3.4 Other Reasons of Delay in Payments... 13 3.5 Payment of Meager Amount... 13 3.6 Payment of Non-land Assets... 14 3.7 Payment for the Structures:... 14 3.8 Payment for the Crops:... 14 3.9 Payment for the Trees:... 15 3.10 Payment of Allowances - Shifting, Vulnerable, Employment, replacement cost, Additional Crop, Electricity and Livelihood Rehabilitation Allowances:... 15 4 Institutional Arrangements for Land and Resettlement Activities... 16 4.1 Environment Afforestation Land and Social (EALS)... 16 4.2 Project Implementation Unit (PIU)... 16 i
4.3 Grievances Redress Mechanism... 16 4.4 Formation of Displaced Persons Committees (DPCs)... 17 4.5 Social Safeguards Management Consultant (SSMC)... 17 4.5.1 Delay in Salary for SSMC s staff... 18 5 Consultation and Information Disclosure... 19 6 Employment Opportunities... 19 7 NHA s Good Faith Efforts... 19 8 Stakeholders Consultations and assessment of DPs Feedback... 20 Table 2.1: Resettlement Monitoring Framework 5 Table 2.2: Monitoring Indicators 5 Table 2.3: Detail of Deliverables 6 Table 3.1: Status of Implementation 10 Table: 3.2 Reasons for Delay in Payment 12 Table 4.1 Details of Registered Complaints for Section-II 14 Table 8.1 Responses of the Contacted DPs@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@... Table 9.1: Proposed Action Plan 20 Figure1.1: Location of Section-II of M4 Motorway (Gojra Shorkot 62Km) 1 Figure 3.1: Payment Disbursement 11 Figure 3.2: Category wise Payment Status of DPs 11 ii
Abbreviation Description ADB Asian Development Bank AH Affected Household CoI Corridor of Impact DP Displaced Person EA Executing Agency (NHA) EMA External Monitoring Agency IA Implementing Agency IMR Internal Monitoring Report GoP Government of Pakistan GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism LAA Land Acquisition Act 1894 LAR Land Acquisition and Resettlement LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan M&E Monitoring & Evaluation NHA National Highway Authority PIU Project Implementation Unit PMU Project Management Unit RoW Right of Way SPS Safeguard Policy Statement, 2009 SSMC Social Safeguard Management Consultant ToRs Term of References iii
Glossary Affected Household: All members of a project affected household residing together and operating as a single economic unit, who are adversely affected by the Project or any of its components; may consist of a single nuclear family or an extended family group Compensation: Money or payment in kind to which the affected masses are entitled in order to replace the lost asset, resource or income Displaced Persons: In the context of involuntary resettlement, displaced persons are those who are physically displaced (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter) and/or economically displaced (loss of land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihoods) as a result of (i) involuntary acquisition of land, or (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas Entitlement: Range of measures comprising compensation, income restoration, transfer assistance, income substitution, and relocation which are due to displaced persons (DPs), depending on the nature of their losses, to restore their economic and social base Involuntary resettlement: Development project results in unavoidable resettlement losses that DPs have no option but to rebuild their lives, incomes and asset bases elsewhere Land Acquisition: The process whereby a person is compelled by a government agency to alienate all or part of the land a person owns or possesses to the ownership and possession of the government agency for public purpose in return for compensation Relocation: The physical resettlement of a DP from her/his pre-project place of residence Replacement Cost: Compensation for acquired land, structures and other assets, including (i) fair market value, (ii) transaction costs, (iii) interest accrued, (iv) transitional and restoration costs, and (v) other applicable payments, if any Resettlement plan: A time-bound action plan with budget setting out resettlement strategy, objectives, entitlement, actions, responsibilities, monitoring and evaluation Vulnerable groups: Distinct groups of people who might suffer disproportionately from resettlement effects iv
1. Introduction 1. Inception/External Monitoring Report: This is 2 nd monitoring report of section-ii of M-4 project. The 2 nd monitoring report has been provided by M/S Abdul Hameed, External Monitoring Agent (EMA), hired by National Highway Authority (NHA) to undertake external monitoring of the LARPs of, i) National Motorway M-4 Gojra - Shorkot Section Project and ii) National Motorway M-4 Gojra Shorkot - Khenewal Section Project_ Additional Finance to provide semiannual external monitoring reports to NHA and ADB. This report combines two parts of external monitoring contract, i.e. inception part and actual external monitoring work. The inception report provides a methodology of the study, work plan and deliverables, while the monitoring part presents the review and validation of implementation of LARP of Section - II and NHA s internal monitoring report (IMR) of November, 2016. The report offers (i) review and analysis of the implementation of LARP, (ii) payments made to DPs by category of impacts including the allowances and (iii) recommendations to address the issues. 1.1 Project Background 2. The Government of Pakistan (GoP) is concentrating on the development of road infrastructure and its major emphasis is on the construction of new motorways/ expressways and improvement of the efficiency of existing roads from single to dual carriageways. The construction of National Motorway M-4 Gojra - Shorkot Section Project and ii) National Motorway M-4 Gojra Shorkot - Khenewal Section Project_ Additional Finance is an effort towards this motive. The M-4 Motorway starts from the end point of M-3 near Faisalabad and ends at Sham Kot (after crossing (N-5) Lahore - Multan, Khanewal. 3. The alignment of the Motorway crosses through four districts of the Punjab Province (Faisalabad, Toba Tek Singh, Jhang and Khanewal. The total length of M-4 is 184 Km (from Faisalabad to Khenewal) is divided into 3 main sections as i) M-4 Section I (Faisalabad Gojra 58 Km), ii) M-4 Section II (Gojra Shorkot 62 Km) and iii) M-4 Section III (Shorkot Khanewal 64 Km). The construction of M-4 Motorway will link major cities of the country like Peshawar, Islamabad, Lahore and Faisalabad with Multan and southern areas. 4. The National Highway Authority (NHA) is currently implementing with the financial assistance of Asian Development Bank (ADB). 1.2 Project Description 5. The Section II of M-4 has a total length of 62 km starting from Gojra Interchange at village 304 (chainage 58+100 km) in Tehsil Gojra, District Toba Tek Singh (Punjab) and ending at village 7 Gagh (chainage 120+268 km) in Tehsil Shorkot, District Jhang in Punjab, Pakistan. 6. Salient features of Project: Section-II is a green field project that has significant Land Acquisition and Resettlement (LAR) impacts. A LARP was prepared by NHA which is currently under implementation following its approval by ADB in July 2015. Figure 1.1. 1
7. According to the approved LARP, the project design includes (i) construction of new 7.3 meter dual carriageway with New Jersey barrier as median; (ii) 3 interchanges; (iii) 5 bridges including 2 main bridges. The Motorway is fenced from both sides and 15 feet wide service road will also be provided for the use of local people. Total width of Right of Way (ROW) is 100 m for carriageway and 40 m for interchanges, which is acquired using the Land Acquisition Act (LAA) of 1894. 2
2 EMA and Scope of Work 8. Need for Monitoring: The ADB s Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) requires the preparation and implementation of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plans (LARP) which are to be monitored internally as well as externally. Internal monitoring is being undertaken by NHA/EALS (through Social Safeguard Management Consultant-SSMC) on a quarterly basis but external monitoring is done on a semi-annual basis by EMA, hired by NHA. This report has been prepared in accordance with NHA s requirement of an inception cum monitoring report. 9. The EMA was recruited by NHA in July 2016 for two projects, ii) National Motorway M-4 Gojra - Shorkot Section Project and iii) National Motorway M-4 Gojra Shorkot - Khenewal Section Project_ Additional Finance. EMA mobilized to M-4 project in January 31, 2017 to conduct external monitoring of implementation of LARP of National Motorway M-4 Gojra - Shorkot Section Project. The external monitoring report (EMR) is based on the review of reports, discussions with project officials and SSMC, field visits and independent investigations. It assesses the extent to which the LARP is being implemented and objectives of LARF and LARP being met. Major activities/work undertaken by EMA for preparation of this inception cum monitoring report include the following : a. Provide guidance to NHA project offices to improve the Resettlement unit's Management Information System (MIS), recommend improvements and review and very internal monitoring system and findings. b. Conduct independent monitoring of the project implementation including project implementing units (PIUs), local offices and consultations with village leaders, and DPs, especially women and vulnerable groups. c. Prepare independent report based on monitoring visits. d. Suggest major recommendations for remedial actions. e. Identify lessons learned. f. Maintain record for independent monitoring surveys, consultations/discussions with DPs in the field and their views about LARP, its preparation and implementation especially the compensation disbursement and resettlements impacts. g. Suggest remedial actions with time-based actions. h. Support capacity development efforts. i. Share the major lessons from the process both in terms of success and failure. 2.1 Monitoring Methodology and Strategy 10. The EMA will use the following monitoring methodology and strategy after a thorough review of the monitoring Terms of References (TORs) and the scope of work/expected outputs assigned by NHA in the monitoring contract. NHA requires undertaking of external monitor of the implementation of LARP of Section II of ongoing M-4 project, confirmation of payments made to the DPs as specified in the LARP, identification of any deviation observed in the field regarding implementation of LARP and construction work, and discuss actions taken or needed to be taken to address any gaps or deviations from the agreed LAR requirements. 11. The monitoring included the use of qualitative and quantitative data collection tools consistent with monitoring of LARP and monitoring indicators. Review of project information included project documents, LARPs, project design, baseline surveys and internal monitoring reports, efforts made to address the issue of payments impeded due to legal and administrative reasons, field site visits, and sample surveys also formed part of the overall monitoring methodology and strategy. 3
2.1.1 Review of Project Information 12. The consultant mobilized the project on January 31, 2017 which is taken as the cut off date for the purpose of monitoring and evaluation of implementation progress. Immediately after mobilization, the EMA reviewed the following documents and collected information needed for preparation of monitoring report of Section II project: a. Internal Monitoring Report b. LARP and baseline survey/ assessment reports/ data c. Project design and drawing d. Compensation payment data e. Details of consultation meetings f. Details of grievance redressed 2.1.2 Field Visit 13. The field site visits were conducted in January 2017 to assess if there are any LAR related issues in acquired ROW and hold consultations with DPs other project stakeholders on the issues of payments to DPs and their resettlement and rehabilitation as provided in the LARPs of Section II. The DPs, whose payments are impeded due to several reasons, were analyzed for efforts needed and efforts NHA is making to resolve the issues. The site visits helped to prepare key activities requiring remedial actions which are explained in relevant sections of this report. 2.1.3 Sampling 14. In order to obtain feedback of DPs, the DPs were sampled for conducting consultations and interviews against interviewing all DPs as this requires spending enormous financial and human recourses in collection of data from all DPs. So the EMA and his team conducted consultations, and interviews with sample of DPs based on different impact categories (with the typology of the impacts). Accordingly, 20% of the villages (with the DPs of multiple project impacts including the vulnerable and women headed households) were consulted. Following approaches were also adopted in this regard; 2.1.4 Rapid Appraisal Methods 15. Rapid appraisal method was used to quickly gather the views and feedback of DPs and other relevant stakeholders. Rapid appraisal methods used included: (i) key informant interview, (ii) focus group discussions, (iii) community group interview, and (iv) direct observation. The chairman of the DPC, DPs, and Women DPs were interviewed. 2.1.5 Participative Approach 16. The participatory approach adopted is as under; A two-ways communication approach was adopted and respondents were given the opportunity to express their views or any concerns about the project; Individual and group meetings were also held to identify and list down the current status of payments and any non-compliance. 2.1.6 Resettlement Monitoring Framework 17. The following monitoring and evaluation (M&E) framework was applied during the LARP monitoring & evaluation process: 4
Table 2.1: Resettlement Monitoring Framework Sequence Inputs Process Outputs Impact Resettlement Dimensions Establishmen t Information to DPs Capacity building Consultation and Participation Compensatio n Relocation Rehabilitation Results 2.1.7 Monitoring Indicators Indicators Qualified staff in place Equipment available Finances available deposit/ Accounts Information Disseminated Training of staff Meetings held and committees formed Compensation paid for assets acquired assets Community assets Replaced/Relocation site prepared Jobs/businesses/income support provided Incomes restored Living standards restored Means of verification Internal monitoring reports Staff presence/ payroll Internal monitoring reports physical verification Internal monitoring reports bank challan Internal and external Monitoring reports Verification from DPs Internal and external monitoring training Internal and external monitoring minutes of the meetings Internal and external monitoring Internal and external monitoring reports Internal and external monitoring reports External monitoring reports External monitoring reports 18. Following are the key Monitoring & Evaluation Indicators that guide the monitoring process. Table 2.2: Monitoring Indicators Monitoring Aspects Delivery of entitlements Consultation and Grievance Redress System Monitoring Indicators No. of DPs who received entitlements according to numbers and categories of loss set out in the entitlement matrix No. of DPs who received payments on time No. DPs who received livelihood support No. of DPs who received the agreed allowances Restoration of social infrastructure and services. No. of consultations taken place as scheduled including meetings, groups, and community activities No. of DPs who participated in consultations No. of DPs who know their entitlements. How many know if they have been received? Have any DPs used the grievance redress procedures? No. of complaints addressed /resolved No. of meetings held by GRCs No. of functional GRCs 5
Monitoring Aspects Participation of DPs Budget and Time Frame Income Restoration Monitoring Indicators No. of general meetings (for both men and women) % of women out of total participants No. of meetings exclusively with women No. of meetings exclusively with vulnerable groups Level of participation in meetings (of women, men & vulnerable groups) Have all land acquisition and resettlement staff been appointed and mobilized for the field and office work on schedule? Are implementation activities being achieved against agreed implementation plan? Have resettlement offices received the scheduled funds? Have funds been disbursed according to LARP schedule? Has all land been acquired and occupied in time for Implementation? No. of DPs covered under income restoration program (women, men & vulnerable groups) % of successful enterprise even (women, men & vulnerable groups) % of DP able to restore income. (women, men & vulnerable groups) % of DP able to improve income (women, men & vulnerable groups) % of DP who improved their standard of living (women, men &vulnerable groups) No. of DPs buying agricultural land (women, men &vulnerable groups) Quantity of land owned by DPs (women, men &vulnerable groups). No. of households with agricultural equipment No. of households with livestock 2.1.8 Data Processing and Analysis 19. The following steps were undertaken to ensure proper data review and analysis: The data gathered during field visits and consultations was processed by category of indicators for analysis purposes. All analyzed data was tabulated for interpretation and deriving conclusions and recommendations. 2.1.9 Deliverables 20. As per contract agreement, three types of the reports are required from the EMA for Section - II. These reports are categorized as, i) inception (including 1st bi-annual) ii) biannual, and iii) lessons learned workshop/project completion report. The completion report will be presented prior to the expiry of contract of EMA on December, 2019). The detail of the report is given in below Table 3. These reports will also be shared among the ADB, NHA and Consultants. Table 2.3: Detail of Deliverables S.NO Reports Tentative Timeline Remarks 1 Inception/ 1 st Bi Annual Report January 2017 1st Bi annual will be 2 2 nd Bi Annual Report July 2017 jointly prepared with 3 3 rd Bi Annual Report January 2018 the inception report 6
S.NO Reports Tentative Timeline Remarks 4 4 th Bi Annual Report July 2018 5 5 th Bi Annual Report January 2019 6 6 th Bi Annual Report July 2019 Lesson Learned Workshop and December 2019 7 Project Completion Report 2.1.10 Workshop with NHA and ADB EMA s Contract will be expired on December 31, 2019 21. A workshop will be held one time on the completion of this monitoring and evaluation assignment as per contract. The participants will be from the PIU, SSMC, PMU and NHA s Senior Management and ADB. EMA will share lessons and key findings of external monitoring. The workshop will be conducted in interactive and participatory manner so that the field staff and senior management of the NHA would have equal opportunities to participate. 2.1.11 Work Plan 22. A work plan has been prepared in consultation with NHA (EALS), PIU-GM office at Faisalabad keeping in view the scope and services of the consultants. However, it may be revised in the light of nature of the assignment if required during the field monitoring activities. The detail is available in the Annex-XX of the report. 2.2 Second Bi-Annual External Monitoring Report 23. This is 2nd bi-annual EMR of LARP implementation of Section II prepared by EMA based on mobilization date, January 31, 2017 which is considered as the cut-off- date. EMR reflects the review of the LARP, IMR for the period of September November, 2017, record of efforts NHA made to address the payment issues, consultation meetings and grievance redress mechanism, and consultations with PIU, SSMC, PMU, ADB and DPs including the women DPs. 2.2.1 Field Visits 24. The field visits were conducted in selected villages along with the ROW of section II and consultations were made with DPs in the randomly selected 22% villages (07 out of 32 villages), namely, i) 400 JB, ii) Kalo wala iii) 500 JB,iv) 398 JB, v) 396 JB, vi) 304, and vii) 505 JB (Annex-I). The focus group discussions were held with 50 DPs (including males and females) and 70 DPs were contacted for individual interview. The chairman of DPC, common DPs including the payment of meager amount and those DPs who have fully or partially received the compensation payment and un-paid DPs were the target of the visit. The list of persons visited is given in Annex-I to III. 2.2.2 Approach for Data Collection 25. The information/data was collected from the primary and secondary sources. The primary data was collected through field visits; focus group discussion, individual and group meetings with DPs and in case of further clarification, the DPs were contacted telephonically. The meetings were held with PIU and SSMC in data collection and verification. The second source information (reflected mostly in section 2.1.1) was collected from the SSMC, PIU and ADB. 7
2.2.3 Types of Collected Data/Information 26. The types of data collected are discussed as under; Sectoral wise compensation Payment Data; DPs awareness about the consultation meetings; DPs awareness about the Grievance redress Mechanism; DPs views about the usages of compensation amount; DPs willingness about receiving of the meager amount compensation; Capture the DPs issues about the compensation payment and on-going civil work 3 Project Impacts and Status of Implementation 27. The total land required for the project is 1554.96 acres as reflected in the LARP. Among the total land, 1214. 46 acres are the private while 340.50 acres are the government land. As per LARP, the government land is completely barren and no private use of the land is reported, i.e., with no tenants, encroachers or squatters. In addition, carriageway comprised on 1497.12 acres while the interchanges are constructed on 57.8 acres of land. The award has been made for the entire private land. The implementation of LARPs started in July 2015 after ADB approved the LARP. 28. The detail of the impacts and compensation disbursement is discussed in Table 3.1 below while the village wise summary is reflected from Annex-V to XVII. 8
Table 3.1: Status of Implementation Sr. No. Impacts as in LARP Numbers and Quantities impacted Quantity Acres Total DPs Payable Payment (Rs. M) DPs (No.) Payment Made Implementation Status (As of November 2016) Amount (Rs. M.) DPs (No.) Balance Amount (Rs. M.) Remarks A LARP (Section II) i) Land Impacts Land Compensation 1214.46 (acre) 3502 647.925 2678 76.47%) 626.737 (96.73%) 824 (23.53%) 21.189 (3.27%) Payment to DPs is slow due to the following reasons Meager amounts of compensation and requiring DPs to open up bank accounts. Transfer of land records Absent or untraceable DPs. DPs contesting in court for higher compensation. Payment is under progress and NHA intends to complete it till May 2017. ii) Non-Land Impacts a) Crops Compensation 811.64 (acre) 463 56.814 b) Affected Structures 118 118 31.935 d) Affected Trees 30707 410 73.683 459 (99.14%) 114 (96.61%) 407 (99.27%) 56.456 (99.37%) 31.720 (99.33%) 73.629 (99.93%) 4 (0.86%) 4 (3.39%) 3 (0.73%) 0.358 (0.63%).215 (0.67%).054 (0.07%) Payment is under progress and NHA intends to complete it till May 2017 Payment is under progress and NHA intends to complete it till May 2017 Payment is under progress and NHA intends to complete it till May 2017 iii) Allowances Resettlement Assistance - 3502 79.464 Replacement Cost - 1006 13.348 2488 (71%) 621 (61.73% 73.506 (92.5%) 11.305 (84.73% 1014 (29%) 385 (38.27%) 5.959 (7.5%) 2.043 (15.27%) Payment is under progress and NHA intends to complete it till May 2017 Payment is under progress and NHA intends to complete it till May 10
2017 Additional Crop - 463 18.447 368 (81%) Livelihood allowance - 23 0.893 19 (82.61%) Transport Allowance - 63 0.856 54 (85.71%) Business loss allowance - 43 2.021 38 (88.37%) Vulnerable - 27 1.07 24 (88.89%) Employment loss - 6 0.238 6 (100%) Electricity - 22 0.88 18 (81.82%) House rent - 23 0.828 19 (82.61%) Actual DPs are 3502 but most have multiple entitlements owing to having the numerous impacts 15.946 (86.44%) 0.734 (82.19%) 0.736 (85.98%) 1.783 (88.22%) 0.951 (88.88%) 0.238 (100%) 0.72 (81.82%) 0.684 (82.61%) 86 (19%) 4 (17.39%) 9 (14.29%) 5 (11.63%) 3 (11.11%) 0 0 4 (18.18%) 4 (17.39%) 2.501 (13.56%) 0.159 (17.81%) 0.12 (14.02%) 0.238 (11.78%) 0.119 (11.12%) 0.16 (18.18%) 0.144 (17.39%) Payment is under progress and NHA intends to complete it till May 2017 Payment is under progress and NHA intends to complete it till May 2017 Payment is under progress and NHA intends to complete it till May 2017 Payment is under progress and NHA intends to complete it till May 2017 Payment is under progress and NHA intends to complete it till May 2017 Payment is under progress and NHA intends to complete it till May 2017 Payment is under progress The payment is under progress 11
3.1 Implementation Analysis 28. The table indicates that by 30 st November 2016, overall disbursement of compensation (land and non-land assets) is 96% (Rs 895 million from the total Rs. 928 million). The resettlement and rehabilitation funds have been disbursed to 76% DPs as reflected in Fig 3.1. NHA/PIU intend to complete the compensation disbursement until March, 2017. NHA/PIU assured to complete it until May 2017. EMA expects a delay in disbursement of payments due to the amount of payments being meager besides there are other factors such as transfer of land rights, absentee DPs and minors, etc which will cause delay in payments until these issues are resolved. 29. These payments are likely to delay because the DPs are reluctant to open 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 76 Fig 3.1: Payment Disbursement 24 Paid DPs 96 4 Amount Disbursed Paid Unpaid bank accounts through which they can be compensated. Unfortunately the cost of opening bank accounts is higher than small amounts of compensation and the DPs appear not interested in opening up their bank accounts. The DPs are of the view that they should be provided cash compensation in their villages without requiring them to open the bank accounts (see report about DPs views about meager amounts at Annex IV). 30. The category wise payment status of DPs is reflected in Fig 3.2 Figure indicates that the overall 88 percent of the DPs have been received their compensation payment and other assistances in the form of allowances. The figure also shows that the significant majority have received their payment for the loss of their crop, structures and trees as compared to land and allowances. 31. The section below provides analysis into the disbursement of compensation by category of impact, reasons responsible for delay and actions required to complete the payments. 71 Fig 3.2: Category wise Payment Status of DPs 88.4 99 76 97 99 Land Crop Structure Trees Allowance Overall 3.2 Land Compensation and Factors Responsible for Delay 32. The total private land required for the Section-II was 1,214.46 acres which has been fully acquired. Payment of land compensation has been achieved by 96.73% (Rs. 626.737 million out of total 647.925 million) and about 76% DPs (2678 DPs of total 3502 DPs) have been paid so far. The payment to remaining 24% DPs will be made once the legal and administrative impediments are resolved. 12
3.3 Meager Amount of Land Payment: There are 379 DPs who have meager amount of compensation. These DPs also have the legal and administrative impediments. However, their payment for meager amountis slow due to the requirement of opening up of bank account by DPs. This is a procedural requirement under the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 in which compensation vouchers are issued to DPs for depositing into their bank account from where the DPs can obtain cash compensation. The EMA found (through field visits, meeting with PIU and DPs and review of IMR and on-going survey records (completed in all 32 villages) that the DPs prefer obtaining direct cash compensation given to them in their villages by NHA because the cost of opening a bank account is higher than the amount of compensation itself. 3.4 Other Reasons of Delay in Payments 33. The EMA found few other reasons, as reported in internal monitoring reports and further reviewed in the field, delaying the compensation that are as below: Inheritance Mutation Absent DPs, i.e., not traceable Lack of ownership titled to DPs DPs have gone under litigation Underage DPs (Juvenile) 34. The Table 5 below indicates the number of DPs whose payments are delayed to various afore-mentioned reasons. Table: 3.2 Reasons for Delay in Payment Unpaid DPs Meager amount Lack of Record Transfer Absent DPs Underage DPs DPs under Litigation/lack of title 824 379 206 478 27 113 Actual DPs are 824 although some of them are encountered with multiple impediments. The DPs of meager amount are 379 but they are having other impediments. 3.5 Payment of Meager Amount 35. NHA (through LAC) is seeking the advice of BOR to make the payment of meager amount. The letter sent to BOR is Annexed D of the report. It is suggested that NHA continues to follow up with Punjab board of revenue in identifying an appropriate compensation mechanism which may facilitate payments the payment of meager amount to DPs expeditiously. EMA also suggest that PIU should also facilitate the DPs of meager amount in resolving (through all concerned) their other impediments to ensure their 100% compensation payment. 36. EMA also recommends that SSMC in consultation with LAC, M-4 team at Faisalabad, Director/Assistant Director Land and ADB (for supervising the implementation to ensure consistency of procedures adopted with ADB s policy) to formulate a mechanism of cash compensation directly provided to DPs in their villages, obtain approval from NHA management and plan to make payments to DPs to comply with SPS s requirement of 100% payment to DPs. The progress of payment should be provided in the monthly progress report, and QIMR, to be validated by the EMA. 13
37. Transfer of Government Land: In Section II, about 340.5 acres of total land acquired is owned by government. However as per PIU, it is state land and the process of transfer of government land to NHA is under process and is expected to be transferred in May 2017. As per PIU, the letter by LAC (the copy is not available) has been forwarded to DC (who is state representative) for transfer of state land. The following actions are proposed regarding compensation of government owned lands: The head of acquiring agency (NHA) will write a letter to head of the department owing the land. For instance, here in this case the letter will be addressed to BOR; The land identification record indicating on the map along with the Mouza and Kasra numbers will be enclosed with the letter; The head of the department to whom the land will be acquired will nominate the focal person to reach on consensus with the acquiring agency The acquiring agency will pay the compensation to concerned department based on the prevailed government rate or to make the negotiation for the transfer of land; The acquiring agency will get the transfer letter/ NOC from the concerned department on giving the land for the project. 38. The EMA recommends that NHA/PIU/SSMC should make the intensive follow up with the concerned department and the process must be monitored and reported in the IMR. 3.6 Payment of Non-land Assets 39. The status of payment of non-land assets as reviewed and verified by EMA is summarized below: 3.7 Payment for the Structures: 40. A total of 118 structures including residential, commercial, cattle yards, community/public structures and miscellaneous structures including water resources owned by 118 DPs who were entitled to receive Rs. 31.935 million as compensation. The payments have been made to 97% (114) of the DPs while the remaining Rs. 0.215 million will be disbursed among 4 DPs once the impediments are resolved. NHA/PIU is doing its utmost efforts to resolve the impediments to complete the 100% payment to DPs. EMA has seen the efforts made by the PIU (through the SSMC) to complete the payments to unpaid DPs, hence it is recommended that such efforts should be continued, monitored and reported in the IMR. 3.8 Payment for the Crops: 41. A total of Rs 56.814 million to be paid to 463 DPs. Approximately 99% (56.456 million) of the funds has been disbursed to 99% DPs (459 out of 463). The remaining 1% (4 DPs) is still waiting for the payment. The compensation payment is delayed due to small amounts of payments to individual DPs (termed as meager and other legal and administrative impediments as reflected in the internal monitoring reports) as discussed earlier. 42. However NHA has a plan to complete the crop compensation to DPs up to the end of May 2017, which requires close monitoring and reporting in the IMR (validated by EMA). 14
3.9 Payment for the Trees: 43. An amount of Rs.73.683 million to be paid to 410 DPs on account of loss of 30707 trees. However, as per latest internal monitoring report and field verification, 99.9% (Rs.73.629 million) has been paid to 99% (407) DPs. NHA/PIU is trying to complete the payment at its earliest. 44. NHA confirmed to complete the payments by end of May 2017. EMA recommends that this to be monitored and reported in periodic internal monitoring reports by NHA/PIU through SSMC. 3.10 Payment of Allowances - Shifting, Vulnerable, Employment, replacement cost, Additional Crop, Electricity and Livelihood Rehabilitation Allowances: 45. In case of allowances payment for Section-II, 5169 DPs had to be paid an amount of Rs.118.075 million. However, as per field situation, 71% DPs (3655 in number) have received 90% (Rs. 106.634 million) of allowance on account of assistance for livelihood restoration, vulnerability, employment loss, electricity, house rent and relocation assistance. The remaining 29% DPs (1514) are still waiting for 10% (Rs.11.442 million) payment. NHA assured to complete the remaining payments by end of May 2017. EMA recommends that this is to be monitored and reported in periodic internal monitoring reports by NHA/PIU/SSMC. 46. In term of allowance category, the resettlement allowance, a total of Rs. 79.464 million to be paid to 3502 DPs. Out of which, Rs. 73.506 million (92.50%) have been paid to 2488 DPs (71.05%). The remaining 1014 DPs (28.95%) are yet to be paid an amount of Rs. 5.959 million (7.50%). Among the unpaid DPs, 824 DPs are facing legal and administrative impediments while the leftover payable DPs in this category are 190 only. Similarly, replacement cost allowance was disbursed to 621 DPs and remaining 385 DPs are yet to be paid. Among the total unpaid DPs, the payments of 272 DPs are delayed owing to having legal and administrative impediments. Hence, EMA recommends that NHA/PIU to facilitate the DPs to resolve the legal and administrative impediments so as to confirm the 100% payment. The process must be monitored and reported in the IMR. 47. Regarding the additional crop allowance, 463 DPs were to be paid an amount of Rs.18.447 million. As per record, 368 DPs (81.06%) have been received Rs. 15.946 million (86.44%) as additional crop compensation allowance. The remaining 86 DPs (18.94%) are yet to be provided a total amount of Rs. 2.501million (13.56%). 48. PIU/ SSMC assured to complete the payment until May 2017, however, for those DPs who are facing the legal and administrative impediments, NHA/PIU/SSMC will facilitate to resolve their issues at the earliest to ensure the 100% payment. EMA recommends that the process must be monitored regularly and reported in the IMR. 15
4 Institutional Arrangements for Land and Resettlement Activities 49. The NHA has kept all the institutional arrangements as mentioned in the LARP on board for addressing the land acquisition and resettlement requirements. The detail is discussed as under; 4.1 Environment Afforestation Land and Social (EALS) 50. NHA established an Environment Afforestation Land and Social (EALS) wing at Headquarter. The EALS is headed by the General Manager (GM), assisted by the land, environment and social staff. The EALS is responsible for preparing, implementing, monitoring, disclosing, and submitting reports to ADB. 4.2 Project Implementation Unit (PIU) 48. NHA has established a Project Implementation Unit (PIU) under the General Manager M-4 in Faisalabad. The PIU presently comprises of a Project Director, Assistant Director (Engineering), Deputy Director (Land) and Land Acquisition Collector (LAC) with support of land staff. PIU is responsible to prepare and implement the safeguard documents (through SSMC) and submit to ADB though (EALS). 4.3 Grievances Redress Mechanism 49. A grievance redress mechanism has been established in the project since September 21, 2015, copy of notification is not provided. The Grievance Redress Committee is headed by the Director Land and the members are Assistant Director (land), LAC (M-4) assisted by concerned Patwari, Resettlement Specialist and Social Mobilizer (male & female). 50. Presently, 41 complaints were received from the DPs during the reporting period. The detail is given in Table 6. Among 41 registered complaints, 32 complaints were resolved while only 9 complaints are still lying pending. These registered complaints are mostly related to the compensation payment, assessment of prices by the Provincial Revenue Departments while the others are pertinent to civil work. Most of the complaints also related to assessment of the prices. Table 4.1: Details of Registered Complaints for Section-II S# 1 2 3 Nature of Complaints Compensation payment issue Access to watercourse Construction of subway Reported Complaints Number of complaint resolved 34 27 4 4 3 1 Total 41 32 Remarks 7 complaints are not resolved yet and are under process The un-resolved complaints (2) are under process. 51 EMA also found (during the field visits) that most of the DPs complaints pertain to the assessment of prices by the Provincial Revenue Department. The complainants have been informed that the prices were assessed/ fixed on the basis of average of the transactions carried out during the last one year and including an independent land valuation study that they were allowed an opportunity by the Land Collector to record the grievances prior to announcement of award. The complainant still can approach the Referee courts for revision of prices. 16
52 The verbal complaints were made in the visited villages regarding the access route, under-pass and repairing of dismantled track, though the SSMC staff noted the complaints during the meeting and assured to the local community to take up the issue with the project director and give you the feedback. EMA recommends that PIU/SSMC and the contractors to take up the complaints (those are related to civil work) on regular basis. The process must be monitored and reported in the IMR. 53 In addition, during the visit, i) Sajjad Haider s/o Muhammad Afzal of village 500 Padrianwala and ii) chairman DPC of 396 JB complained that their rooms (tube well and cattle shed respectively) was not included in the compensation list. EMA recommends that PIU through SSMC investigate the matters and process should be reported in the forthcoming IMR. 4.4 Formation of Displaced Persons Committees (DPCs) 55 EMA found through IMR, discussion with the PIU, SSMC and DPs during the field visits that DPC (male) exists in each village. These committees are taken on-board by the project staff in addressing the grievances of the DPs at village level and also coordinating with the PIU in dispute resolution and for the smooth running of project activities. EMA also found that the women committees are existed at village level but are not existed in most of the villages of the project area, eventually the women in those villages are not familiar with their compensation payment status and on-going project activities. 56 EMA also found that few DPs like Shakeela Bano of Chak 304 JB, Ameer and Abdul Khaliq of Chak 400, do not know about the DPC/its composition in their villages. The female DP are unaware where the female DPC is not exited while in case of male ignorant, the DPs were not frequently contacted and as per PIU field teams were busy on section-iii regarding the compensation disbursement. EMA recommends that all the DPs including the females must be contacted regularly and the frequency of the meeting should be increased. This process must be monitored and reported, including the list of contact persons DPs in the IMR. 4.5 Social Safeguards Management Consultant (SSMC) 57 In order to effectively implement the LARP and address the social safeguard issues, NHA employed SSMC. SSMC is staffed by Resettlement Specialist, Gender Specialist, MIS/ M&E and Social Mobilizers and is assisting NHA/ PIU in the LARP implementation and monitoring and capacity building in LAR. SSMC staffs is performing well, however there is need training regarding the safeguard requirements of loan and procedural matters of LAA pertaining to disbursement of payment to DPs. 58 The EMA recommends a refresher workshop for SSMC and PIU on payment related procedures and issues of LAA, SPS 2009 and LARP provisions/implementation requirements of the project. It is good to know that PIU and SSMC already on the same page to organize the training workshop, as in the presence of EMA, PIU (Mr. Imran) asked the SSMC to organize the training workshop and Mr. Shaukat assured to plan it soon. 59 SSMC should also document best practice case studies on resettlement and rehabilitation, compensation delivery, consultations and grievance management, employment creation and productive utilization of compensation money, etc 60 EMA also found that management information system is now functioning well. The information related to project is available in the system. However, there is need to centrally 17
control the system, so that the entire information is available at the main system instead the information are available in bits and pieces in different locations. 4.5.1 Delay in Salary for SSMC s staff 61 EMA also found that the staffs are not receiving their salaries timely, i.e., their salaries are delayed by 2-3 months. PIU reported that the invoices are submitted late by SSMC despite the time and again request. EMA recommends analyzing the contract made between NHA and SSMC to find out payment arrangement, mode and timing of payment as to why payments are so delayed. In addition, NHA/PIU will ensure that all the SSMC staffs receive salaries on the dates as specified in the contract and this should be monitored internally by PIU and validated by EMA. 18
5 Consultation and Information Disclosure 64. PIU is conducting consultations with DPs since the LARP planning and implementation. The consultations focused on the compensation assessment, eligibility criterion and entitlements, and compensation disbursement process. These meetings are organized at the village level. A total of 46 (32 M, 14 F) consultation meetings were held in the reporting period and 233 (182 M, 51 F) DPs participated in the village level meetings. 65. The information disclosure has been well achieved by NHA through SSMC. LARP and project information brochures have been disclosed to all DPs. The DPs seem quite aware about their entitled compensation and livelihood restoration allowances and procedures of payments. 66. In terms of gender perspective, the LARP also identified the women DPs regarding the loss of their assets. Like, male DPs the women are also receiving their payment. 67. The consultation meetings are very essential in term of information sharing and disclosure. EMA found that the meetings are not held in each village during the reporting period, even none of the meeting was held in September, 2016, though PIU responded that the entire team was deputed on section-iii of M-4 owing to face the urgency to complete the compensation disbursement process. EMA recommends that these meetings should be organized in routine in the entire villages of the project area, so that the DPs and local people know about their compensation payment and ongoing project civil activities, as in few villages the DPs have concerns related to civil work so that can be addressed through the proper forum/grc. These meetings should be monitored, documented and reported in the IMR. 6 Employment Opportunities 68. The LARP provisioned for employment of local laborers and members of AFs. PIU has been follow up with contractors in providing job opportunities to locals. The EMA visited the project sites and found that the local people are working with the contractor. As per PIU, total employees are 2357 and out of them 57 are Chinese. However, the employee data in term of local employment is not updated yet but PIU assured to monitor the local work force and will be reported in the forth-coming IMR. EMA recommends that PIU (through SSMC) should monitor the direct (through employment) and indirect (in the form of running tea stalls near the camp office etc) project based livelihood sources for the DPs. The database must be developed for all such DPs and figure regularly reported in the IMR. 7 NHA s Good Faith Efforts 69. The EMA minutely reviewed the IMR (for the period September November 2016), the status of compensation to DPs & documents provided by PIU, visited the project sites, held discussion with DPs and detailed discussions with SSMC (Team Leader, MIS Expert, M&E Expert, Social Mobilizers), PIU GM-M4, Director and Deputy Director Land. EMA considers that the efforts made by NHA (Annex-XVIII) for the disbursement of payment to DPs (where the payments unfortunately found to be stuck due to some legal and administrative impediments) seems to be consistent with the ADB s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS), 2009 related to disbursement of compensation and commencement of civil work. The efforts are discussed as under; a) Contacted DPs of meager amount and informed them about efforts being made to compensate them in cash. A survey by PIU (through SSMC) was conducted to capture the views. 19
b) NHA is approaching (through LAC) the BOR and district government to seek the advice to give the cash compensation for meager amount. c) NHA/PIU/SSMC is working closely with revenue department to get the land transfer record corrected/updated following which the DPs will be compensated and verified by EMA. d) NHA and SSMC are making efforts by facilitating DPs of obtaining CNIC. They will be compensated after they are provided with CNIC and their bank accounts are corrected. e) NHA has issued public notices in local newspapers to untraceable DPs and fixed public notices in villages and advertised contact details of officials who the DPs can contact for payments. 8 Stakeholders Consultations and assessment of DPs Feedback 70. A proper questionnaire was established to assess the views of the DPs regarding the compensation payment, uses of the compensation amount and detail is reflected in the Table 8.1. A total of 120 DPs were contacted during the field visits. Among the total contacted DPs, 93 have been received their complete compensation payment and livelihood assistance (in the form of allowances) while 27 DPs were unpaid and their payment was delayed to legal and administrative impediments. The DPs responses are discussed in the below Table 8.1. Table 8.1: Responses of the Contacted DPs S. # Indicators Number of Respondents 1 Status of awareness regarding the compensation payment and livelihood assistances Percentage of the Respondents 120 100 2 Constructed the houses 26 22 3 Arrange the marriages of their children 9 8 4 Households use (in routine expenses) 29 24 5 Purchased land 18 15 6 Established the business 7 6 7 Miscellaneous use (paid back the loan to bank, 21 18 buy motorbike, cow & Tractor) 8 Compensation rate was assessed on lower 120 100 side 9 DPs wants the payment for the meager amount 8 100 10 Awareness level about the GRM 102 85 71. Table indicates that 100% DPs have the awareness about their compensation payment and livelihood assistances. The DPs are generally happy with compensation payments and they made the good use of compensation payment like, 15% of the DPs purchased alternate land to continue their farming activities, 22% of the DPs constructed new houses, 6% DPs started business, 8% arranged the marriages of their children, 24% of the DPs spent their compensation amount on the routine households expenses and remaining 18% of the DPs spent the amount on miscellaneous expenses like paid back their loan to bank, buy motorbike, cow and Tractor. 72. Survey also reveals that all the contacted 120 DPs were not satisfied over the prices by the Provincial Revenue Department. The complainants have been informed that the prices were assessed/ fixed on the basis of average of the transactions carried out during 20
the last one year and including an independent land valuation study that they were allowed an opportunity by the Land Collector to record the grievances prior to announcement of award. 73. All 8 contact DPs wants to be compensated in cash but not through district treasury vouchers. NHA in consultation with district revenue authority/deputy Commissioner is in the process of setting up the issue of meager amount to make the cash payments to DPs. 74. As per field investigation, 85% DPs have the knowledge about the GRC while only 15% are unaware about the grievance redress system. As per PIU these people do not have any complaint related to the compensation disbursement hence are least interest regarding the GRC. 75. The people of the Chak 494, 495 & 496 showed the serious concerns over the available underpass that is not spacious to pass the sugarcane trolley, as this is mostly the sugarcane grown area and access to sugarcane factory will become hard in this way. 76. Sajjad Haider s/o Muhammad Afzal of village 500 Padrianwala Mouza Kalowala complained that the room of his tube well was not included in the compensation list, although it was located in the project area before the cut-off-date. 77. The chairman DPC of 396 JB complained that his room was not included in the compensation list despite located in the project area prior to cut-off-date. 21
9 Conclusions 78. Based on the review and field verification, the EMA concludes that land for carriageway and interchanges have been fully acquired. 79. Likewise compensation disbursement of carriageway and 3 interchanges has been completed by 96% (Rs 895 million from the total Rs. 928 million) to 76% DPs. 80. NHA has generally demonstrated good faith efforts in its attempt to complete 100% payment to all the DPs. However due to some legal and administrative impediments there are DPs whose payment is either slow or stuck. The efforts for the disbursement of payment to DPs (where the payments unfortunately found to be stuck due to some legal and administrative impediments) seems to be consistent with the ADB s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS), 2009 related to disbursement of compensation and initiation of construction work. 81. The institutional arrangements and consultation and grievance redress mechanisms as mentioned in the approved LARP are fully in place and generally functioning well. However needs improvement in the functioning of GRM, DPC and SSMC s staff needs trainings for an achievable SSMC work plan, improve outreach to DPs, timely reporting of periodical reports, fully functional management information system. 82. Most of the DPs showed their concerns pertain to the assessment of prices by the Provincial Revenue Departments. The complainants have been informed that the prices were assessed/ fixed on the basis of average of the transactions carried out during the last one year and including an independent land valuation study that they were allowed an opportunity by the Land Collector to record the grievances prior to announcement of award. 83. Status of awareness among the DPs regarding the compensation payment and livelihood assistances was found 100%. The DPs are generally happy with compensation payments and they made the good use of compensation payment like, i) purchased alternate land, ii) constructed a new houses, iii) started business, iv) Paid back the bank loan and vi) arranged the marriages of their children. 84. DPs of meager amount want the cash compensation instead of receiving the compensation vouchers. In addition, these DPs are having other legal and administrative impediments. 85. The people of the Chak 494, 495 & 496 showed the serious concerns over the available underpass that is not spacious to pass the sugarcane trolley, as this is mostly the sugarcane grown area and access to sugarcane factory will become hard in this way. 86. Sajjad Haider s/o Muhammad Afzal of village 500 Padrianwala Mouza Kalowala complained that the room of his tube well was not included in the compensation list, although it was located in the project area before the cut-off-date. 87. The chairman DPC of 396 JB complained that his cattle shed room was not included in the compensation list despite located in the project area prior to cut-off-date. 22
10 Recommendations 88. The EMA makes following recommendations to address the payment and nonpayment related issues of DPs: a. The unpaid DPs due to meager amounts need to be paid in cash as per their preference as BOR standing order 28 (Punjab) allows cash compensation to DPs in villages. b. NHA need to continue its efforts to make the payment to DPs of meager compensation and also continues follow up with Punjab board of revenue for a possibility of appropriate compensation mechanism which may facilitate payments to DPs of meager amount expeditiously. c. SSMC in coordination with PIU and revenue department must also continue to facilitate payment of DPs who have problems with CNIC, correction in names/titles and inheritance. Progress on these cases needs to be reported in monitoring reports and verified by EMA; d. PIU is making concerted efforts to address the issues related to compensation disbursement, but needs continued support from SSMC s social mobilizers in the field. PIU may also provide guidance to SSMC s SMs about this can be improved. e. EMA recommends analyzing the contract made between NHA and SSMC to find out payment arrangement, mode and timing of payment as to why payments are so delayed. A joint visit of PIU, SSMC and ADB (for supervises the implementation to ensure consistency of procedures adopted with ADB s policy) should jointly review the agreement to find out payment arrangement, mode and timing of payment as to why payments are so delayed. f. Consultations with DPs should be continued to facilitate them in resolving any grievances and issues pertinent to payment of meager amounts on other payments pending due CNIC and problems with land records, etc. g. PIU/SSMC need to make the follow up for the transfer of government/state land (340.50 acres) to NHA. h. PIU/SSMC should investigate and address the issues/concerns of the DPs highlighted in the section 8. The process must be monitored and reported in the IMR. i. PIU/SSMC should increase the frequency of the meetings in each village so as the DPs should get awareness about the on-going project activities especially the presence of the grievance redress system. 23
Table 9.1: Proposed Action Plan S# Impact/Indicator Proposed Actions Timeline Responsibility Remark 1 Payment of meager amount Explore the mechanism for cash payment May be taken into confidence to NHA s management On-going activity PIU, LAC & SSMC Ensure the 100% payment of meager amount to all the DPs 2 Strengthening of SSMC Analyzing the contract made between NHA and SSMC A joint visit of PIU, SSMC and ADB should be undertaken Coordination with NHA s EALS and Procurement wings Organize the training for SSMC May, 2017 PIU, SSMC & ADB Ensure the strengthening of SSMC 3 Strengthening of GRM Registration of verbal complaints Put on the agenda of GRC meeting Coordination with the DPC at village level On-going activity PIU & SSMC Ensure the strengthening of GRM 4 Strengthening of DPC (women) Women DPC should be established in all the villages Conduct the well-structured methodology On-going activity PIU & SSMC Ensure the strengthening of DPC 5 Arranging the consultation on regular basis SSMC coordinate with the DPC to arrange the regular meeting Properly record the minutes of meetings On-going activity PIU&SSMC Ensure the participants of DPs 6 Updating the Management Information System All the computerized data must be transferred to central system. The data must be entered on daily basis and backlog must be cleared immediately Progress of MIS must be monitored in routine May 2017 PIU & SSMC Ensure the updating of MIS 7 Transfer the Government/state Land to NHA PIU/SSMC should make the follow up with the concerned department Prepare the minutes of the follow up meetings May 2017 PIU &SSMC Ensure the transfer of Government land to NHA 24
8 9 Resolving of the DPs concerns for the noninclusion of the affected rooms in the compensation list Provision of underpass as per the requirements of the people of the Chak 494, 495 & 496 PIU and SSMC investigate the matters with the coordination of DPC Prepare the minutes of the meetings PIU and SSMC investigate the matter through the Construction supervision consultant Minutes of the meeting must be prepared May 2017 PIU &SSMC Ensure to resolve the issues May 2017 PIU,SSMC, CSC& Contractor Ensure to resolve the issue 25
Annexure-I: Attendance Sheet 26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Annexure-II: List of visited DPs (Male) for individual Interview S # Date Village AP Name 1. 30-01-2017 304 JB Muhammad Mustafa 2. 30-01-2017 304 JB Muhammad Mansha 3. 30-01-2017 304 JB Shakaaila Bano 4. 30-01-2017 304 JB Akram Cheema 5. 30-01-2017 304 JB Ashiq Hussain 6. 30-01-2017 304 JB Muhammad Arif 7. 30-01-2017 304 JB Muhammad Zaman 8. 30-01-2017 396 JB Nazeer Ahmad 9. 30-01-2017 396 JB Mehmood Ahmad 10. 30-01-2017 396 JB Muhammad Yaseen 11. 30-01-2017 396 JB Rub Nawaz 12. 30-01-2017 396 JB Muhammad Riaz 13. 30-01-2017 396JB Haq Nawaz 14. 30-01-2017 396 JB Rukhsana 15. 30-01-2017 396 JB Naeem Akhtar 16. 30-01-2017 398 JB Faqeer Muhammad 17. 30-01-2017 398 JB Khalid Mehmood Heir of (Ahmad Ali) 18. 30-01-2017 398 JB Azra 19. 30-01-2017 398 JB Ayesha Anwar 20. 30-01-2017 398 JB Shabiran Bibi 21. 30-01-2017 398 JB Munir Ahmad 22. 30-01-2017 398 JB Wahid Ismail 23. 31-01-2017 500 JB Muhammad Habib 24. 31-01-2017 500 JB Muhammad Muneer 25. 31-01-2017 500 JB Arshaad Hussian 26. 31-01-2017 500 JB Bashier Ahmad 33
S # Date Village AP Name 27. 31-01-2017 500 JB Muhammad Asif Noor 28. 31-01-2017 500 JB Muhammad Nawaz heir of Sultan 29. 31-01-2017 500 JB Ghulam Mustafa 30. 31-01-2017 500 JB Jagga(Ishaq) 31. 31-01-2017 Kalowala Muhammad Jameel 32. 31-01-2017 Kalowala Mian Azhar Pervaz 33. 31-01-2017 Kalowala Ghulam Fareed 34. 31-01-2017 Kalowala Sajad Heider Sajad 35. 31-01-2017 Kalowala Ghulam Fareed 36. 31-01-2017 Kalowala Muhammad Irshaad 37. 31-01-2017 Kalowala Umar Ali F/O Ahmad Umer 38. 31-01-2017 Kalowala Faizan Bibi 39. 31-01-2017 505 JB Saddan Bibi 40. 31-01-2017 505 JB Raees Abbas 41. 31-01-2017 505 JB Umar Hayat heir of Muhammad Sadiq 42. 31-01-2017 505 JB Naseem Bibi 43. 31-01-2017 505 JB Mehmood 44. 31-01-2017 505 JB Abid HussaIn 45. 31-01-2017 505 JB Fakhar Abbas 46. 31-01-2017 505 JB Muhammad Nawaz 47. 31-01-2017 400 JB Muhammad Sadiq 48. 31-01-2017 400 JB Ameer 49. 31-01-2017 400 JB Abdual Khaliq 50. 31-01-2017 400 JB Noor Muhammad 34
Annexure-III: List of visited female DPs for individual Interview S # Date Village DP Name 1 30-01-2017 304 JB RabiaArshad 2 30-01-2017 304 JB ShaguftaRehana 3 30-01-2017 304 JB SakeenaBibi 4 30-01-2017 304 JB Munawwar Begum 5 30-01-2017 304 JB AkramCheema 6 30-01-2017 304 JB DaowdArshad 7 30-01-2017 304 JB Shahid Hassan 8 30-01-2017 304 JB Kubra Begum 9 30-01-2017 304 JB Asadzaman 10 30-01-2017 304 JB IshfaqShahid 11 30-01-2017 396 JB SughranBibi 12 30-01-2017 396 JB HabiburRehman 13 30-01-2017 396 JB Jahangir 14 30-01-2017 396 JB Muhammad Riaz 15 30-01-2017 396 JB YasirMehmood 16 30-01-2017 396 JB Muhammad Ayyaz 17 30-01-2017 396 JB AmeenaBibi 18 30-01-2017 396 JB KaneezanBibi 19 30-01-2017 396 JB NaeemAkhtar 20 30-01-2017 396 JB AzizanBibi 21 30-01-2017 398 JB Muhammad Afzal 22 30-01-2017 398 JB Muhammad Azeem 23 30-01-2017 398 JB Shahnazkausar 24 30-01-2017 398 JB Muhammad Saleem 25 30-01-2017 398 JB UlfatHussain 26 30-01-2017 398 JB Muhammad Younis 27 30-01-2017 398 JB Zahid Ismail 28 30-01-2017 398 JB Muhammad Nazir 29 30-01-2017 398 JB Basharat 30 30-01-2017 398 JB SughranBibi 31 31-01-2017 400 JB Muhammad Akram s/o Muhammad ismail 32 31-01-2017 400 JB Abdul Hameed S/o Jalal Din 33 31-01-2017 400 JB Manzoor Ahmad S/O Charagh Din 34 31-01-2017 400 JB Zahid Ali S/O Sadiq 35
S # Date Village DP Name 35 31-01-2017 400 JB SafiaBibi W/O Ashiq Ali 36 31-01-2017 400 JB ZareenaBibi D/O Ashiq Ali 37 31-01-2017 400 JB Zafar Ali S/O Ashiq Ali 38 31-01-2017 400 JB Ameer Shah S/O Faqeer Shah 39 31-01-2017 400 JB KhaiberZaman S/O Mehmood Khan 40 31-01-2017 400 JB Umar Daraz S/O Allah Ditta 41 31-01-2017 500 JB Ghulamshabbeer S/O Noor Muhammad 42 31-01-2017 500 JB Allah Yar S/O Ghulam Muhammad 43 31-01-2017 500 JB ShahzadLoaba S/O Loyas (Bahadur) 44 31-01-2017 500 JB IjazHussian S/O Fateh Muhammad 45 31-01-2017 500 JB YousafShakeel S/O Mical 46 31-01-2017 500 JB GulSher S/O Khan 47 31-01-2017 500 JB KosarBibi W/O Nasirahmad 48 31-01-2017 500 JB NazrianWd/O Rafeel 49 31-01-2017 500 JB Abdul Basit Noor 50 31-01-2017 500 JB Mugadleen W/O Loyas 51 31-01-2017 505JB Shah Muhammad S/O Barket Ali 52 31-01-2017 505JB SajidaNaseem D/O Maqbool Ahmad 53 31-01-2017 505JB MujahidFarooq S/O Yaqoob 54 31-01-2017 505JB LalKabeer S/O Fazal 55 31-01-2017 505JB Naseer Ahmad S/O Ahmad 56 31-01-2017 505JB KahlidHussian S/O TalibHussian 57 31-01-2017 505JB Haq Nawaz S/O Muhammad Yousaf 58 31-01-2017 505JB Mukthar Ahmad S/O Muhammad Khan 59 31-01-2017 505JB Manzoor Ahmad S/O Ahmad Bakhsh 60 31-01-2017 505JB Bashrian W/O Muhammad Aslam 61 31-01-2017 Kalowala SaminaAfzal D/O Muhammad Afzal 62 31-01-2017 Kalowala HammadHeider S/O Muhammad Afzal 63 31-01-2017 Kalowala Abdual Aziz S/O Asgher Ali 64 31-01-2017 Kalowala JannatBibi S/O Lal Khan 65 31-01-2017 Kalowala SattBharai W/O Lal Khan 66 31-01-2017 Kalowala SafderIqbal S/O Allah Bakhsh 67 31-01-2017 Kalowala Muhammad shafi S/O Ghulam Muhammad 68 31-01-2017 Kalowala Naseem Mai Wd/O Muhammad Iqbal 69 31-01-2017 Kalowala Muhammad Ali S/O Muhammad Iqbal 70 31-01-2017 Kalowala Noor Muhammad S/O Allah Bakhsh 36
Annexure-IV: DPs response over Meager Amount Compensation 37
Annex-V: Village-wise Payment Status of Land Payment Village Total DPs Paid DPs Unpaid DPs Total Amount (Rs.) Amount Disbursed (Rs.) Balanced Amount (Rs.) District Toba Tek Singh Singh 304-JB 69 35 34 7,395,937 6,334,412 1,061,525 305-JB 128 98 30 11,689,750 11,182,925 506,825 307-JB 183 136 47 10,821,500 10,699,220 122,280 310-JB 149 98 51 17,779,000 16,908,424 870,576 311-JB 352 265 87 16,739,688 16,092,807 646,881 317-JB 8 8 0 573,562 573,562-360-JB 99 52 47 2,988,203 2,596,786 391,417 378-JB 113 94 19 15,179,281 14,612,714 566,567 383-JB 180 169 11 58,018,219 57,831,375 186,844 384-JB 110 101 9 46,309,063 45,762,476 546,587 385-JB 107 85 22 32,412,750 32,256,401 156,349 390-JB 32 23 9 19,557,187 19,548,565 8,622 396-JB 28 26 2 12,769,313 12,174,365 594,948 398-JB 89 37 52 1,169,766 841,943 327,823 400-JB 25 23 2 3,100,687 3,078,348 22,339 401-JB 101 95 6 20,888,313 20,829,096 59,217 438-JB 8 5 3 34,500 22,145 12,355 469-JB 80 47 33 18,261,281 17,440,926 820,355 383-JB Interchange 81 69 12 36,990,243 33,320,398 3,669,845 388-JB Interchange 10 10 0 12,229,531 12,229,531-401-JB Interchange 29 28 1 6,429,938 6,426,394 3,544 38
Village Total DPs Paid DPs Unpaid DPs Total Amount (Rs.) Amount Disbursed (Rs.) Balanced Amount (Rs.) District Jhang 487-JB 116 90 26 8,703,244 8,350,489 352,755 488-JB 48 38 10 6,801,848 6,748,047 53,801 489-JB 208 178 30 14,392,839 13,775,685 617,154 490-JB 218 193 25 46,338,157 45,220,972 1,117,185 406-JB 73 67 6 13,839,890 13,591,753 248,137 505-JB 34 28 6 4,960,813 4,797,043 163,770 494-JB 87 82 5 31,018,196 30,943,861 74,335 496-JB 61 41 20 6,318,475 6,030,547 287,928 KaloWala 221 128 93 48,741,887 46,012,196 2,729,691 500-JB 77 62 15 20,626,386 19,921,061 705,325 504-JB 180 141 39 48,508,437 46,528,863 1,979,574 501-JB 105 59 46 13,196,250 12,234,033 962,217 RakhKotla 28 27 1 16,626,880 16,619,584 7,296 7 Gagh 32 29 3 10,518,820 10,182,071 336,749 487-JB Interchange 23 1 22 1,413,537 435,476 978,061 Rakh Kotla Interchange 10 10 0 4,582,319 4,582,319 - Total 3,502 2,678 824 647,925,690 626,736,813 21,188,877 39
Annexure-VI: Village-wise Payment Status of Crop compensation Village Total Paid Un Paid Total Amount (Rs.) Amount Disbursed (Rs.) Balanced Amount (Rs.) District Toba Tek Singh Singh 304-JB 4 4-475,287 475,287-305-JB 23 23-2,430,505 2,430,505-307-JB 19 19-2,544,706 2,544,706-310-JB 14 14-1,713,373 1,713,373-311-JB 37 37-2,523,715 2,523,715-317-JB 1 1-224,767 224,767-360-JB 6 6-524,332 524,332-378-JB 18 18-3,767,228 3,767,228-383-JB 33 33-2,481,211 2,481,211-384-JB 20 20-5,054,011 5,054,011-385-JB 22 22-3,559,880 3,559,880-390-JB 10 10-898,305 898,305-396-JB 14 14-2,684,448 2,684,448-398-JB 3 3-34,608 34,608-400-JB 7 7-695,545 695,545-401-JB 11 11-756,474 756,474-469-JB 9 8 1 2,546,445 2,532,502 13,943 383-JB Interchange 388-JB Interchange 401-JB Interchange 16 16-1,431,218 1,431,218-3 2 1 469,475 390,675 78,800 3 3-254,731 254,731-40
Village Total Paid Un Paid Total Amount (Rs.) Amount Disbursed (Rs.) Balanced Amount (Rs.) District Jhang 487-JB 21 21-1,558,245 1,558,245-488-JB 7 7-695,845 695,845-489-JB 22 22-1,342,520 1,342,520-490-JB 17 17-2,037,140 2,037,140-406-JB 13 13-516,044 516,044-505-JB 5 5-496,056 496,056-494-JB 9 9-790,696 790,696-496-JB 10 10-959,807 959,807 - KaloWala 28 27 1 3,779,146 3,533,496 245,650 500-JB 12 12-1,689,031 1,689,031-504-JB 17 17-2,516,116 2,516,116-501-JB 8 8-1,392,407 1,392,407 - RakhKotla 8 8-2,771,114 2,771,114-7 Gagh 8 8-693,450 693,450-487-JB Interchange Rakh Kotla Interchange 2 1 1 67,987 48,125 19,862 3 3-438,628 438,628 - Total 463 459 4 56,814,496 56,456,241 358,255 41
Annexure-VII: Village-wise Payment Status Structure Village Total Paid Un Paid Total Amount (Rs.) Amount Disbursed (Rs.) Balanced Amount (Rs.) District Toba Tek Singh Singh 304-JB 6 3 3 1,501,816 1,316,043 185,773 305-JB 6 6-742,794 742,794-310-JB 1 1-1,385,600 1,385,600-311-JB 2 2-103,555 103,555-317-JB 1 1-1,428,413 1,428,413-383-JB 3 3-794,608 794,608-385-JB 3 3-205,647 205,647-390-JB 1 1-108,232 108,232-396-JB 12 12-6,914,638 6,914,638-400-JB 1 1-90,000 90,000-401-JB 1 1-245,232 245,232-469-JB 2 1 1 744,293 715,303 28,990 383-JB Interchange 388-JB Interchange 7 7-403,577 403,577-1 1-39,768 39,768 - District Jhang 487-JB 3 3-631,447 631,447-488-JB 3 3-175,420 175,420-489-JB 6 6-1,190,099 1,190,099-490-JB 1 1-1,078,654 1,078,654-406-JB 4 4-148,140 148,140-42
Village Total Paid Un Paid Total Amount (Rs.) Amount Disbursed (Rs.) Balanced Amount (Rs.) 494-JB 5 5-433,605 433,605-496-JB 5 5-459,600 459,600 - KaloWala 10 10-3,500,359 3,500,359-500-JB 4 4-673,006 673,006-504-JB 8 8-2,259,584 2,259,584-501-JB 7 7-1,368,883 1,368,883 - RakhKotla 6 6-656,642 656,642-7 Gagh 8 8-4,390,939 4,390,939 - Rakh Kotla Interchange 1 1-260,641 260,641 - Total 118 114 4 31,935,192 31,720,429 214,763 43
Annexure-VIII: Village-wise Payment Status of Trees Village Total Paid Un Paid Total Amount (Rs.) Amount Disbursed (Rs.) Balanced Amount (Rs.) District Toba Tek Singh Singh 304-JB 3 3-132,058 132,058-305-JB 17 16 1 2,374,755 2,357,206 17,549 307-JB 16 16-1,676,245 1,676,245-310-JB 11 11-604,744 604,744-311-JB 22 22-1,667,197 1,667,197-317-JB 0 - - - - - 360-JB 3 3-215,944 215,944-378-JB 16 16-2,673,532 2,673,532-383-JB 31 31-13,263,563 13,263,563-384-JB 19 19-5,408,735 5,408,735-385-JB 18 18-8,372,389 8,372,389-390-JB 11 11-5,172,608 5,172,608-396-JB 10 10-2,745,610 2,745,610-398-JB - - - - - - 400-JB 4 4-498,676 498,676-401-JB 17 17-4,336,742 4,336,742-438-JB - - - - - - 469-JB 9 8 1 437,869 411,394 26,475 383-JB Interchange 17 17-4,012,343 4,012,343-388-JB Interchange 2 2-243,437 243,437-401-JB Interchange 5 5-610,231 610,231-44
Village Total Paid Un Paid Total Amount (Rs.) Amount Disbursed (Rs.) Balanced Amount (Rs.) District Jhang 487-JB 24 24-2,226,051 2,226,051-488-JB 6 6-487,549 487,549-489-JB 19 19-1,148,936 1,148,936-490-JB 21 21-1,265,346 1,265,346-406-JB 11 11-359,959 359,959-505-JB 6 6-211,081 211,081-494-JB 16 16-1,372,189 1,372,189-496-JB 8 8-552,840 552,840 - KaloWala 27 26 1 9,291,064 9,281,307 9,757 500-JB 5 5-562,559 562,559-504-JB 14 14-686,786 686,786-501-JB 7 7-348,984 348,984 - RakhKotla 7 7-385,744 385,744-7 Gagh 5 5-149,204 149,204-487-JB Interchange 2 2-22,338 22,338 - Rakh Kotla Interchange 1 1-165,911 165,911 - Total 410 407 3 73,683,219 73,629,438 53,781 Annexure-IX: Village-wise Payment Status of Additional Crop 45
Village Total Paid Un Paid Total Amount (Rs.) Amount Disbursed (Rs.) Balanced Amount (Rs.) District Toba Tek Singh Singh 304-JB 4 3 1 256,464 255,840 624 305-JB 22 17 5 817,440 749,268 68,172 307-JB 19 18 1 854,568 821,652 32,916 310-JB 14 14-667,680 667,680-311-JB 37 32 5 1,066,572 972,504 94,068 317-JB 1 1-82,992 82,992-360-JB 6 4 2 162,864 120,744 42,120 378-JB 17 16 1 723,996 716,352 7,644 383-JB 33 28 5 1,064,076 1,007,760 56,316 384-JB 20 13 7 1,263,756 1,104,168 159,588 385-JB 22 14 8 1,038,804 902,772 136,032 390-JB 10 8 2 360,984 339,300 21,684 396-JB 13 11 2 821,496 661,596 159,900 398-JB 3 2 1 63,648 35,880 27,768 400-JB 7 5 2 238,524 192,816 45,708 401-JB 11 8 3 454,428 285,636 168,792 438-JB - - - - - - 469-JB 9 4 5 637,884 331,812 306,072 383-JB Interchange 16 8 8 576,888 370,812 206,076 388-JB Interchange 3 2 1 165,204 161,460 3,744 401-JB Interchange 3 3-104,052 104,052-46
Village Total Paid Un Paid Total Amount (Rs.) Amount Disbursed (Rs.) Balanced Amount (Rs.) District Jhang 487-JB 21 20 1 647,400 635,700 11,700 488-JB 7 6 1 346,788 319,176 27,612 489-JB 22 20 2 932,412 833,508 98,904 490-JB 17 16 1 693,888 631,020 62,868 406-JB 13 11 2 181,896 169,416 12,480 505-JB 5 4 1 147,420 133,536 13,884 494-JB 9 6 3 474,708 304,200 170,508 496-JB 9 7 2 152,100 139,308 12,792 KaloWala 25 25-975,936 975,936-500-JB 12 9 3 576,888 422,760 154,128 504-JB 16 15 1 807,612 783,276 24,336 501-JB 8 5 3 479,388 304,512 174,876 RakhKotla 7 6 1 247,572 219,492 28,080 7 Gagh 8 7 1 202,020 189,384 12,636 487-JB Interchange 2-2 42,432-42,432 Rakh Kotla Interchange 3-3 116,376-116,376 Total 454 368 86 18,447,156 15,946,320 2,500,836 47
Annexure-X: Village-wise Payment Status of Resettlement Allowance Village Total Paid Un Paid Total Amount (Rs.) Amount Disbursed (Rs.) Balanced Amount (Rs.) District Toba Tek Singh Singh 304-JB 69 35 34 985,905 835,438 150,467 305-JB 128 98 30 3,323,955 3,179,667 144,288 307-JB 183 136 47 3,073,073 3,038,196 34,877 310-JB 149 98 51 4,940,153 4,692,539 247,613 311-JB 352 265 87 4,759,803 4,575,496 184,307 317-JB 8 8 0 217,455 217,455-360-JB 99 52 47 679,797 590,685 89,112 378-JB 113 94 19 2,466,398 2,374,477 91,920 383-JB 180 169 11 3,765,405 3,752,920 12,485 384-JB 110 101 9 4,387,114 4,335,381 51,733 385-JB 107 85 22 3,072,210 3,057,400 14,810 390-JB 32 23 9 1,853,681 1,852,866 815 396-JB 28 26 2 3,630,926 3,461,749 169,177 398-JB 89 37 52 443,494 319,327 124,167 400-JB 25 23 2 899,659 891,164 8,495 401-JB 101 95 6 2,468,441 2,461,179 7,262 438-JB 8 5 3 6,540 4,179 2,361 469-JB 80 47 33 3,456,799 3,301,244 155,555 383-JB Interchange 388-JB Interchange 401-JB Interchange 81 54 27 1,988,205 1,487,895 500,310 10 9 1 461,479 450,988 10,491 29 19 10 479,464 418,151 61,313 48
District Jhang 487-JB 116 76 40 3,024,341 2,680,856 343,485 488-JB 48 34 14 1,476,405 1,461,467 14,938 489-JB 208 146 62 2,902,488 2,359,443 543,045 490-JB 218 176 42 5,583,525 4,943,781 639,744 406-JB 73 56 17 1,749,087 1,465,007 284,080 505-JB 34 27 7 1,410,642 1,296,375 114,267 494-JB 87 77 10 2,138,171 2,096,798 41,373 496-JB 61 34 27 673,348 512,712 160,636 KaloWala 221 112 109 3,647,322 3,416,198 231,124 500-JB 77 55 22 1,757,125 1,639,039 118,086 504-JB 180 123 57 2,758,608 2,433,288 325,320 501-JB 105 36 69 1,876,163 1,347,874 528,289 RakhKotla 28 23 5 1,489,258 1,482,402 6,856 7 Gagh 32 26 6 718,810 694,829 23,981 487-JB Interchange Rakh Kotla Interchange 23 0 23 489,274-489,274 10 8 2 409,976 377,140 32,836 Total 3502 2488 1,014 79,464,497 73,505,605 5,958,892 49
Annexure-XI: Village-wise Payment Status of Livelihood Allowances Village Total Paid Un Paid Total Amount (Rs.) Amount Disbursed (Rs.) Balanced Amount (Rs.) District Toba Tek Singh Singh 304-JB 3 1 2 118,890 39,630 79,260 317-JB 1 1-39,630 39,630-383-JB 2 2-60,630 60,630-396-JB 4 3 1 158,520 118,890 39,630 District Jhang 496-JB 1 1-39,630 39,630 - KaloWala 3 3-118,890 118,890-500-JB 1 1-39,630 39,630-504-JB 1 1-39,630 39,630-501-JB 4 3 1 158,520 118,890 39,630 7 Gagh 3 3-118,890 118,890 - Total 23 19 4 892,860 734,340 158,520 50
Annexure-XII: Village-wise Payment Status of Transport Allowances Village Total Paid Un Paid Total Amount (Rs.) Amount Disbursed (Rs.) Balanced Amount (Rs.) District Toba Tek Singh Singh 304-JB 4 1 3 65,000 15,000 50,000 310-JB 1 1-25,000 25,000-311-JB 1 1-10,000 10,000-317-JB 1 1-15,000 15,000-383-JB 3 1 2 26,000 6,000 20,000 385-JB 2 2-20,000 20,000-390-JB 1 1-10,000 10,000-396-JB 7 6 1 90,000 80,000 10,000 401-JB 1 1-10,000 10,000-383-JB Interchange 2 2-20,000 20,000 - District Jhang 487-JB 1 1-20,000 20,000-490-JB 1 1-30,000 30,000-494-JB 4 4-50,000 50,000-496-JB 4 3 1 65,000 50,000 15,000 KaloWala 7 5 2 95,000 70,000 25,000 500-JB 4 4-55,000 55,000-504-JB 5 5-65,000 65,000-501-JB 7 7-100,000 100,000 - RakhKotla 3 3-30,000 30,000-7 Gagh 4 4-55,000 55,000 - Total 63 54 9 856,000 736,000 120,000 51
Annexure-XIII: Village-wise Summary of Business Allowances Village Total Paid Un Paid Total Amount (Rs.) Amount Disbursed (Rs.) Balanced Amount (Rs.) District Toba Tek Singh Singh 304-JB 1-1 79,260-79,260 310-JB 1 1-79,260 79,260-311-JB 1 1-39,630 39,630-383-JB 1 1-39,630 39,630-385-JB 2 2-79,260 79,260-390-JB 1 1-39,630 39,630-396-JB 2 1 1 79,260 39,630 39,630 401-JB 1 1-39,630 39,630-383-JB Interchange 2-2 79,260-79,260 District Jhang 487-JB 1 1-79,260 79,260-490-JB 1 1-118,890 118,890-494-JB 4 4-198,150 198,150-496-JB 3 3-198,150 198,150 - KaloWala 5 4 1 198,150 158,520 39,630 500-JB 4 4-158,520 158,520-504-JB 5 5-198,150 198,150-501-JB 4 4-158,520 158,520 - RakhKotla 3 3-118,890 118,890-7 Gagh 1 1-39,630 39,630 - Total 43 38 5 2,021,130 1,783,350 237,780 52
Annexure-XIV: Village-wise Payment Status of Vulnerable Allowances Village Total Paid Un Paid Total Amount (Rs.) Amount Disbursed (Rs.) Balanced Amount (Rs.) District Toba Tek Singh Singh 304-JB 4 1 3 158,520 39,630 118,890 305-JB 1 1-39,630 39,630-307-JB 1 1-39,630 39,630-310-JB 5 5-198,150 198,150-311-JB 1 1-39,630 39,630-317-JB 1 1-39,630 39,630-378-JB 1 1-39,630 39,630-396-JB 3 3-118,890 118,890-401-JB 1 1-39,630 39,630-469-JB 2 2-79,260 79,260 - District Jhang 487-JB 1 1-39,630 39,630 - KaloWala 2 2-79,260 79,260-501-JB 1 1-39,630 39,630-7 Gagh 3 3-118,890 118,890 - Total 27 24 3 1,070,010 951,120 118,890 53
Annexure-XV: Village-wise Payment of Employment Allowance Village Total Paid Un Paid Total Amount (Rs.) Amount Disbursed (Rs.) Balanced Amount (Rs.) District Toba Tek Singh Singh 310-JB 5 5 0 198,150 198,150 - District Jhang- 487-JB 1 1 0 39,630 39,630 - Total 6 6 0 237,780 237,780 - Annexure-XVI: Village-wise Payment Status of Replacement Cost Allowance Village Total Paid Un Paid Total Amount (Rs.) Amount Disbursed (Rs.) Balanced Amount (Rs.) District Toba Tek Singh Singh 305-JB 128 84 44 2,024,866 1,823,064 201,802 307-JB 183 120 63 1,872,037 1,675,686 196,351 310-JB 153 84 69 2,332,605 2,053,545 279,060 311-JB 354 237 117 2,247,441 2,045,348 202,093 317-JB 9 8 1 95,230 95,230-396-JB 36 19 17 2,211,865 1,389,778 822,087 398-JB 89 29 60 194,214 113,824 80,390 400-JB 25 20 5 393,977 293,558 100,419 469-JB 4 1 3 234,490 206,387 28,103 District Jhang 487-JB 25 19 6 1,771,415 1,638,604 132,811 Total 1,006 621 385 13,378,140 11,335,024 2,043,116 54
Annexure-XVII: Village-wise Payment Status of Electricity Allowance Village Total Paid Un Paid Total Amount (Rs.) Amount Disbursed (Rs.) Balanced Amount (Rs.) District Toba Tek Singh Singh 304-JB 3 1 2 120,000 40,000 80,000 310-JB 1 1-40,000 40,000-317-JB 1 1-40,000 40,000-396-JB 4 3 1 160,000 120,000 40,000 District Jhang 487-JB 1 1-40,000 40,000-490-JB 1 1-40,000 40,000-494-JB 1 1-40,000 40,000-496-JB 2 2-80,000 80,000 - KaloWala 3 2 1 120,000 80,000 40,000 504-JB 1 1-40,000 40,000-501-JB 1 1-40,000 40,000-7 Gagh 3 3-120,000 120,000 - Total 22 18 4 880,000 720,000 160,000 55
Annexure-XVIII: Village-wise Payment Status of House Rent Village Total Paid Un Paid Total Amount (Rs.) Amount Disbursed (Rs.) Balanced Amount (Rs.) District Toba Tek Singh Singh 304-JB 3 1 2 108,000 36,000 72,000 317-JB 1 1-36,000 36,000-383-JB 1 1-36,000 36,000-396-JB 5 4 1 180,000 144,000 36,000 District Jhang 496-JB 1 1-36,000 36,000 - KaloWala 3 2 1 108,000 72,000 36,000 500-JB 1 1-36,000 36,000-504-JB 1 1-36,000 36,000-501-JB 4 4-144,000 144,000-7 Gagh 3 3-108,000 108,000 - Total 23 19 4 828,000 684,000 144,000 56
Annexure-XIX: NHA Good Faith Efforts 57
58
59
60
61
Annex-XX: Work Plan 1 External Monitoring Reports (Bi Annual Basis) Review of documents /Reports/Maps/IMRs/ 1.1 payment status 1.2 Discuss the methodology to prepare the EMR 1.3 Consultations with PIU, SSMC, DPs including vulnerable and women headed households 1.4 Functioning of GRM Task / Output Jan,2017 Jul, 2017 Jan, 2018 Jul, 2018 Jan, 2019 Jul, 2019 Dec,2019 W1 W2 W3 W1 W2 W3 W1 W2 W3 W1 W2 W3 W1 W2 W3 W1 W2 W3 W1 W2 W2 1st Bi a nnual 2nd Bi annual 3 rd Bi a nnua l 4th Bi Annual 5th Bi Annual 6th Bi annual 1.5 Participants Observation (Field Visits) 1.6 Safeguard non- compliance 1.7 Any missing safeguard Issues/impacts 1.8 Data processing & Analysis 1.9 Conclusion & Receommendation 1.1 Submission of EMR (draft) 1.11 Submission of EMR (Final) 2 Proje ct Completion Report 2.1Compensation Payments 2.2 Livelihood Restoration Consultations with PIU, SSMC, DPs including 2.3 vulnerable and women headed households 2.4 safeguard non compliance 2.5 General Public Views about the project 2.6 Data compution and analysis 2.7 Conclusion & Receommendation 2.8 Project Completion Report (Draft) 2.9 Project Completion Report (Final) 3 Workshop 3.1Invitation to PIU, PMU, SSMC and ADB 3.2 Result Dissemination 3.3 Recommendations 3.4 Workshop Proceeding Report c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c 62
Photo Gallery Meeting with the DPs of 304 JB Meeting with the DPs of 304 JB Meeting with the DPs of 398 JB Meeting with the DPs of 398 JB Meeting with the DPs of 505 Meeting with the DPs of 505 63
Meeting with the DPs of 400 JB Meeting with the DPs of 400 JB Meeting with the DPs of 500 Meeting with the DPs of 500 Meeting with the DPs of Kalowala Meeting with the DPs of Kalowala 64
Meeting with the DPs of 396 JB Meeting with the DPs of 396 JB 65