Monetary Policy ECON 30020: Intermediate Macroeconomics Prof. Eric Sims University of Notre Dame Spring 2018 1 / 19
Inefficiency in the New Keynesian Model Backbone of the New Keynesian model is the neoclassical model The equilibrium of the neoclassical model, Y f t, is approximately efficient the quantities associated with this equilibrium are optimal from perspective of a hypothetical social planner Because of stickiness in the price level, no guarantee that Y t = Yt f as equilibrium outcome in the short run But the optimal equilibrium of the New Keynesian model features Y t = Yt f Basically, use endogenous monetary policy to implement hypothetical neoclassical equilibrium in short run 2 / 19
Optimal Policy in the New Keynesian Model Optimal Policy will involve adjustment of M t (equivalently, interest rates r t or i t ) in response to exogenous shocks to implement Y t = Y f t Basically, don t wait for medium run dynamics to close the gap In the long run, we are all dead (Keynes) This will involve countercyclical/contractionary policy in response to demand shocks (i.e. move M t opposite what would happen to Y t ), but expansionary/accommodative policy in response to supply shocks (i.e. move M t in same direction as what would happen to Y t ) As we will shall see, optimal policy is consistent with price stability: targeting a constant price level (equivalently, constant inflation) implements optimal equilibrium except conditional on shocks to P t 3 / 19
Why not Fiscal Policy? Want to use monetary policy to implement neoclassical equilibrium Why not fiscal policy (i.e. adjustment of G t and/or T t to extent to which Ricardian Equivalence does not hold)? Could use fiscal policy to implement Y t = Yt f, but because this affects IS curve will affect rt f (the hypothetical real interest rate in the neoclassical model), and hence the distribution of output across consumption and investment in the neoclassical model Potentially long implementation lags with fiscal policy Consensus view: fiscal policy ought to be geared more toward the long run (e.g. infrastructure), with possible exception of extreme periods where monetary policy is ineffective 4 / 19
Optimal Monetary Policy Responses: IS and Supply Shocks IS shocks: Positive IS shocks cause output to rise, but do not affect Yt f If nothing done, will open up a positive output gap, Y t Yt f Optimal policy should reduce M t (equivalently, raise r t /i t ) to counteract the IS shock Supply shocks: Supply shocks (changes in A t or θ t ) affect Yt f and cause Y t to react less than Yt f Optimal policy should increase M t (equivalently, lower r t /i t ) to accommodate positive supply shocks (increase in A t or decrease in θ t ) Intuition: M t P t needs to adjust to implement neoclassical equilibrium. If P t can t adjust, adjust M t 5 / 19
Counteracting a Positive IS Shock Original Post-Shock, no policy response rr tt LLLL(MM 2,tt, PP 0,tt) LLLL(MM 0,tt, PP 1,tt) LLLL(MM 0,tt, PP 0,tt) Post-shock, indirect effect of PP tt on LM curve, no policy response rr 2,tt rr 1,tt rr 0,tt Original, flexible price Optimal policy response 0 subscript: original Post-shock, flexible price IIII 1 subscript: post-shock, no policy response IIII 2 subscript: post-shock, optimal policy ww tt ww 1,tt NN ss (ww tt, θθ tt) PP tt AAAA ff AAAA ww 0,tt = ww 2,tt PP 1,tt PP 0,tt = PP 2,tt = PP 0,tt NN dd (ww tt, AA tt, KK tt) AAAA = AAAA AAAA NN tt = AA ttff(kk tt, NN tt) NN 0,tt NN 1,tt NN tt YY 0,tt YY 1,tt = NN 2,tt = YY 2,tt ff = YY 0,tt 6 / 19
Counteracting a Positive AS Shock Original Post-Shock, no policy response Post-shock, indirect effect of PP tt on LM curve, no policy Original, flexible price response Post-shock, flexible Optimal policy price response 0 subscript: original 1 subscript: post-shock, no policy response rr tt rr 0,tt rr 1,tt rr 2,tt LLLL(MM 0,tt, PP 0,tt) LLLL(MM 0,tt, PP 1,tt) LLLL(MM 2,tt, PP 0,tt) IIII 2 subscript: post-shock, optimal policy ww tt NN ss (ww tt, θθ tt) PP tt AAAA ff AAAA ff AAAA ww 2,tt AAAA ww 0,tt PP 0,tt = PP 2,tt = PP 0,tt ww 1,tt PP 1,tt NN dd (ww tt, AA 1,tt, KK tt) NN dd (ww tt, AA 0,tt, KK tt) NN tt AAAA AAAA AA 1,ttFF(KK tt, NN tt) = AA 0,ttFF(KK tt, NN tt) NN 1,tt NN 0,tt NN 2,tt NN tt YY 0,tt YY 1,tt YY 2,tt ff = YY 0,tt ff = YY 1,tt 7 / 19
The Case for Price Stability Conditional on both IS and AS shocks (coming from changes in A t or θ t ), optimal policy response involves no change in price level In other words, a goal of price stability achieves the goal of no output gap, Y t = Y f t This forms the normative basis for strict inflation targets adopted by many central banks around the world targeting price stability is optimal A very neat result. Central bank does not need to know what Yt f is in order to implement optimal equilibrium just needs to target a constant price level! A statement of the so-called Divine Coincidence (Blanchard and Gali, 2007) 8 / 19
Targeting Price Stability Can think about price stability as meaning that the position of the LM curve is endogenously chosen such that the AD curve is perfectly horizontal at a targeted price level. Call this effective AD curve rr tt rr 0,tt IIII PP tt AAAA PP 0,tt = PP 0,tt AAAA ee YY 0,tt ff = YY 0,tt 9 / 19
Price Stability: IS Shock rr tt rr 1,tt rr 0,tt IIII IIII PP tt AAAA PP 0,tt = PP 1,tt = PP 0,tt AAAA ee YY 0,tt = YY 1,tt ff = YY 0,tt 10 / 19
Price Stability: AS Shock rr tt rr 0,tt rr 1,tt IIII PP tt AAAA AAAA PP 0,tt = PP 1,tt = PP 0,tt AAAA ee YY 0,tt ff = YY 0,tt YY 1,tt ff = YY 1,tt 11 / 19
When is Price Stability Not a Good Goal? Price stability is not a good goal conditional on shocks to P t Such shocks shift the AS curve but do not change Y f t Targeting price stability involves Y t reacting to these shocks Breaks the divine coincidence In a sense, this possibility strengthens case for price stability if price level never changes, there is really no reason for P t to ever exogenously change 12 / 19
Price Stability: P t Shock rr tt rr 1,tt rr 0,tt IIII PP tt AAAA AAAA PP 1,tt PP 0,tt = PP 1,tt = PP 0,tt AAAA ee YY 1,tt YY 0,tt ff = YY 0,tt 13 / 19
The Natural Rate of Interest Wicksell (1898), and later Woodford (2003): the natural rate of interest is r f t, the real interest rate which would obtain in the absence of nominal rigidities (i.e. the medium run). Satisfies: Y f t = C (Y f t G t, Y t+1 G t+1, r f t ) + I d (r f t, A t+1, f t, K t ) + G t Instead of adjusting the money supply, can think of monetary policy as trying to set the real interest rate equal to the natural rate, which automatically implements Y t = Y f t Set M t such that: M t P t = M d (r f t + π e t+1, Y f t ) r t > r f t Y t < Y f t ; r t < r f t Y t > Y f t Recently, many feel that rt f fell significantly but r t couldn t fall enough because of ZLB, resulting in negative output gap 14 / 19
Why not Fiscal Policy for Short Run Stabilization? M t affects neither rt f nor Yt f Therefore a well-defined exercise to pick M t such that the economy is at a point on the IS curve where (r t, Y t ) = (rt f, Yt f ). Not so with fiscal policy, since G t and G t+1 affect rt f In other words, could adjust G t to implement Y t = Yt f, but since this would affect rt f, you wouldn t have C t = Ct f and I t = It f 15 / 19
Monetary Policy In Practice Taylor (1993) argues that a fairly simple rule written in terms of inflation and the output gap fits data well: i t = r + π + φ π (π t π ) + φ y (Y t Y f t ) r and π are long run targets, and φ π and φ y are positive coefficients Not exactly the optimal policy response we discussed above, and phrased in terms of nominal interest rate rather than money supply But embodies some of the features of optimal policy: Positive output gap: raise nominal interest rate If inflation above target, likely that output gap is positive (e.g. basic Phillips Curve idea), so responding to inflation kind of makes sense as well Hence, the Taylor rule has some desirable normative properties 16 / 19
Taylor Rule versus FFR: Data The Taylor rule provides a pretty good positive description of monetary policy making from the early 1980s to mid 2000s 12 10 8 6 4 2 0-2 -4 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 Federal Funds Rate Monetary Policy Rule 17 / 19
Replacing LM Curve with MP Curve Can re-write model by replacing LM curve with a Taylor rule, which is sometimes called the MP curve (for monetary policy ) Basic idea: M t is endogenous and adjusts to hit interest rate target Auxiliary assumptions: Adaptive expectations, so πt+1 e = π t Re-write AS curve in terms of π t instead of P t (trivial to do) Parameter φ π governs slope of AD curve in way similar to discussion about price stability above bigger φ π means AD is flatter See GLS Appendix D 18 / 19
The Zero Lower Bound The Taylor Rule relationship breaks down after 2008 when the economy hit the zero lower bound (ZLB) 7 Effective Federal Funds Rate 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 Will next consider implications of the ZLB for policy 19 / 19