MANAGING HOME HEALTH AND HOSPICE REGULATORY RISK IN THE NEW HEALTH CARE ECONOMY

Similar documents
Deciphering the Self-Disclosure Puzzle

Anti-Kickback Statute Jess Smith

Stark Self-Disclosure. Thomas S. Crane 1/ Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, PC

Regulatory Compliance Policy No. COMP-RCC 4.21 Title:

Physician Lease Arrangements: New Rules

HOSPITAL COMPLIANCE POTENTIAL IMPLICATION OF FRAUD AND ABUSE LAWS AND REGULATIONS FOR HOSPITALS

Fraud and Abuse Compliance for the Health IT Industry

Hancock, Daniel & Johnson, P.C., P.O. Box 72050, Richmond, VA , ,

Managing Financial Interests: The Anti Kickback Statute (AKS)

Mission Statement. Compliance & Fraud, Waste and Abuse Training for Network Providers 1/31/2019

Improving Integrity in Nursing Centers

Conflicts of Interest 9/10/2017. Everything a Health Care Executive Needs to Know about the Anti-Kickback Statute. May 2, 2017 Article from JAMA:

Ridgecrest Regional Hospital Compliance Manual

Anti-Kickback Statute and False Claims Act Enforcement

MANAGING HOSPITAL/PHYSICIAN FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIPS

Building a Strategic Plan for Physician Employment and Practice Acquisition

D E B R A S C H U C H E R T, C O M P L I A N C E O F F I C E R

Industry Funding of Continuing Medical Education

Check Your Physician Contracts

Coding Partners in Patient Safety

Fraud, Waste and Abuse: Compliance Program. Section 4: National Provider Network Handbook

PHYSICIAN INVESTMENT COMPLIANCE

Repay Overpayments (18 USC 1347; 42 CFR et seq.)

Gifts to Referral Sources. Kim C. Stanger (11-17)

Region 10 PIHP FY Corporate Compliance Program Plan

Stark Self-Disclosure 1/ Thomas S. Crane 2/ Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, PC

Disclaimer LEGAL ISSUES IN PHYSICAL THERAPY

PART B - REMEDYING HARM FROM CRIMINAL CONDUCT, AND EFFECTIVE COMPLIANCE AND ETHICS PROGRAM

Compliance in Physician Employment and Hospital- Physician Integration

FRAUD, WASTE, & ABUSE (FWA) for Brokers. revised 10/17

7/25/2018. Government Enforcement in the Clinical Laboratory Space. The Statutes & Regulations. The Stark Law. The Stark Law.

CORPORATE INTEGRITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AND TEXAS GENERAL SURGEONS

Cardinal McCloskey Community Services. Corporate Compliance. False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions

Physician Relationship Compliance Issues

Physician Relationship Compliance Issues. Charles Oppenheim Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, PC

Current Status: Active PolicyStat ID: Fraud, Waste and Abuse

FWA (Fraud, Waste and Abuse) Training

Completing the Journey through the World of Compliance. Session # COM6, March 5, 2018 Gabriel L. Imperato, Managing Partner Broad and Cassel

The Stark Law and Self-Disclosure:

Effective Date: 5/31/2007 Reissue Date: 10/08/2018. I. Summary of Policy

BRIEF CONTENTS. Preface...xv Acknowledgments...xvi. Part I: Financial Management. Chapter 1 Financial Management in Context... 3

It s Here: The Final 60 Day Overpayment Rule

Avoiding an October Surprise: Strategies for Complying with the New Stark Law Rules

What is a Compliance Program?

MENTAL HEALTH MENTAL RETARDATION OF TARRANT COUNTY. Board Policy. Number A.3 July 31, 2001 COMPLIANCE PLAN

U.S. v. Sulzbach: Government Theories, Potential Defenses, and Lessons Learned

Law Department Policy No. L-8. Title:

FALSE CLAIMS ACT ENFORCEMENT: RECENT TRENDS AND STEPS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE AND AVOID FRAUD ALLEGATIONS

1/29/2011. Mark G. Bodner Bureau Chief Complex Civil Enforcement Bureau Medicaid Control Unit Office of the Attorney General

NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital Sites: All Centers Hospital Policy and Procedure Manual Number: D160 Page 1 of 8

CMS Opens its Doors by Creating the Stark Voluntary Self-Referral Disclosure Protocol But Enter at Your Own Risk

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL WORK PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2006 MEDICARE HOSPITALS

Federal Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Section 6032 on Fraud, Waste, and Abuse

UNDERSTANDING AND WORKING WITH THE LATEST STARK LAW DEVELOPMENTS

C. Enrollees: A Medicaid beneficiary who is currently enrolled in the MCCMH PIHP.

Recent Developments In Voluntary Disclosure Stark Law

Cedargate Health Care COMPLIANCE PROGRAM MANUAL CODE OF CONDUCT AND COMPLIANCE GUIDELINES

GOALS OF THIS PRESENTATION HOW WE GOT HERE WHERE WE ARE MANDATORY COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS LESSONS FROM MANDATORY COMPLIANCE IN NEW YORK MY PREDICTIONS

ANTI-FRAUD PLAN INTRODUCTION

CORPORATE COMPLIANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Telemedicine Fraud and Abuse Under the Microscope

I. PREAMBLE TERM AND SCOPE OF THE CIA

Stark and the Anti Kickback Statute. Regulating Referral Relationship. February 27-28, HCCA Board Audit Committee Compliance Conference.

FAST BREAK : STARK LESSONS FOR PHYSICIAN PRACTICE ACQUISITIONS Albert Shay, Eric Knickrehm, and Jake Harper August 23, 2018

WHISTLEBLOWERS. Labor and Employment Briefing May 19, 2016 Robert E. Hauberg, Jr.

Certifying Employee Training Navicent Health s Corporate Integrity Agreement Year Two

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT FOR THE LIFETIME HEALTHCARE COMPANIES

Navigating Self-Disclosure

The Anesthesia Company Model: Frequently Asked Questions

Commitment to Compliance

Ensuring Compliance with the Law - Properly Structuring Innovative Marketing and Creative Joint Ventures. Top 5 Things to Know for CE:

Ensuring Compliance with the Law - Properly Structuring Innovative Marketing and Creative Joint Ventures. Clay Stribling, Esq.

S ark L aw aw An A t n i-kickbac b k S atut u e an an d Fal F se Cl C aims A c A t E f n orcement Jay y P. P A n A sti t n i e, e JD R adma m p

Understanding The Regulations Impacting Physician Arrangements AVOIDING STARK, FALSE CLAIMS ACT AND ANTI-KICKBACK VIOLATIONS

SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER POLICY AND PROCEDURE. No:

Compliance as Risk Management (and Vice Versa)

WHAT EVERY NEW PRACTITIONER SHOULD CONSIDER

Anti-Kickback Statute: Are Per-Patient Referral Fee Arrangements Permissible?

MANAGED CARE FRAUD & ENFORCEMENT

SOUTH NASSAU COMMUNITIES HOSPITAL One Healthy Way, Oceanside, NY 11572

This course is designed to provide Part B providers with an overview of the Medicare Fraud and Abuse program including:

Compliance Program. Investigation Policy. Purpose. Applicability. Policy. Unity House of Troy, Inc.

6/2015. Hospital Board Training Part 2: Laws Every Board Member Should Know. Holland & Hart LLP

Health Law 101: Issue-Spotting In Dealing With Health-Care Providers. by William H. Hall Jr.

Code of Conduct U.S. Supplemental Requirements

A DISCUSSION WITH THE OIG

HELAINE GREGORY, ESQ.

Fair Market Value Implications for Sleep Transactions National Sleep Foundation

Structuring Specialty Pharmacy Distribution Arrangements in a Turbulent Regulatory Environment Mini Summit XVIII

Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: 2004 Update for Non-U.S. Issuers.

Medicare Parts C & D General Compliance Training

3/17/2015. HCCA Compliance Institute April 19, Legal Obligations to Disclose and Refund. Background on Government Approach to Overpayments

Stark/Anti- Kickback Fundamentals

Drive Defensively: How Hospice Officers and Directors Can Avoid Liability CHAPCA 2013 Annual Conference October 28-30, 2013

Florida Health Law Traps -

Auditing Physician Arrangements

Anti-Kickback Statute Compliance in Healthcare Transactions

Fraud and Abuse in the Medicare Program

Medicare Parts C & D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training

Self Funded Provider Manual. Self Funded Provider Manual 1. Section 8: Compliance

Transcription:

MANAGING HOME HEALTH AND HOSPICE REGULATORY RISK IN THE NEW HEALTH CARE ECONOMY By: Thomas William Baker, Esq. Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC (404) 221-6510 (Phone) (404) 238-9640 (Facsimile) tbaker@bakerdonelson.com

I. WHAT IS THE LAW? A. U.S. Constitution. B. The Common Law. C. Federal Statutes and Regulations. 1. Federal Regulations. 2. Administrative Procedure Act.

I. WHAT IS THE LAW? D. Federal Courts. E. Federal Manuals. F. State Statutes and Regulations. G. State Courts. H. The Modern Practice of Law.

II. WHAT MAKES THE HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY UNIQUE? A. Prominence of the Health Care Economy. B. The Role of Federal Law in Health Care.

HOW CAN WE UNDERSTAND AND COMPLY WITH THE LAWS GOVERNING THE GOVERNMENTAL REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAMS? There can be no doubt but that the statutes and provisions in question, involving the financing of Medicare and Medicaid, are among the most completely impenetrable texts within human experience. Indeed, one approaches them at the level of specificity herein demanded with dread, for not only are they dense reading of the most tortuous kind, but Congress also revisits the area frequently, generously cutting and pruning in the process and making any solid grasp of the matters addressed merely a passing phase. REHABILITATION ASSOCIATION OF VIRGINIA v. KOZLOWSKI, 42 F.3d 1444 (4th Cir. 1994)

IS THE ACA THE FINAL WORD? NOT LIKELY. Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1983 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 The Medicare and Medicaid Patient and Program Protection Act of 1987 Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act of 1988 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 Balanced Budget Act of 1997 Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits Improvement and Protection Act (BIPA) of 2000 Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 The Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA) Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 Whatever comes next

III. EVOLUTION OF THE LAW GOVERNING INDIVIDUAL LIABILITY FOR CORPORATE ACTS A. Evolution of the Law. B. Responsible Officer Doctrine. 1. Managers are Responsible for Corporate Acts. 2. Knowledge Not Required. 3. Willfulness Arising from Responsibility.

III. EVOLUTION OF THE LAW GOVERNING INDIVIDUAL LIABILITY FOR CORPORATE ACTS C. Individual Director Liability for Corporate Acts Under In re: Caremark International, Inc. Derivative Litigation. 1. Standard of Conduct Applicable to Corporate Directors. 2. The Role of the Federal Sentencing in Determining the Standard of Care.

III. EVOLUTION OF THE LAW GOVERNING INDIVIDUAL LIABILITY FOR CORPORATE ACTS 3. The Duty Under Delaware Law. 4. The Danger of Misplaced Reliance on Prior Standards. to 5. Expansion of Caremark Duties to Officers.

III. EVOLUTION OF THE LAW GOVERNING INDIVIDUAL LIABILITY FOR CORPORATE ACTS D. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 1. Rationale of Act. 2. CEO and CFO Certification of Financial Statements and Periodical Reports. 3. Certification Requirements. 4. The Role of Independent Directors. 5. Penalties.

III. EVOLUTION OF THE LAW GOVERNING INDIVIDUAL LIABILITY FOR CORPORATE ACTS E. Intermediate Sanctions Against Tax Exempt Organizations. 1. Purpose. 2. Individual Liability. 3. Disqualified Person. 4. Penalties.

III. EVOLUTION OF THE LAW GOVERNING INDIVIDUAL LIABILITY FOR CORPORATE ACTS F. Forfeiture Provisions of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. 1. Forfeiture Provisions. 2. Trust Fund.

III. EVOLUTION OF THE LAW GOVERNING INDIVIDUAL LIABILITY FOR CORPORATE ACTS G. False Claims Act. 1. Qui Tam Actions. 2. Damages. 3. Whistle Blowers. 4. Individual Liability.

III. EVOLUTION OF THE LAW GOVERNING INDIVIDUAL LIABILITY FOR CORPORATE ACTS H. Piercing the Corporate Veil. 1. General Rule. 2. When the Corporate Veil May Be Pierced. 3. Corporate Trust Doctrine. 4. Key Element to Liability.

III. EVOLUTION OF THE LAW GOVERNING INDIVIDUAL LIABILITY FOR CORPORATE ACTS I. Corporate Integrity Agreements. 1. Governmentally Imposed Compliance Plans. 2. Individual Responsibility.

IV IV. WHAT ARE THE TWO PRIMARY AREAS OF REGULATORY COMPLIANCE AND WHAT CAN YOU DO TO MANAGE REGULATORY RISK? A. Claims for Payment. B. Relationships With Referral Sources. C. Managing Regulatory Risk.

V. WHAT IS STARK? A. Stark. B. Stark Regulations and Modifications. C. What is the General Rule Under Stark? D. How Do You Determine Whether a Referral Implicates Stark? 1. Is There a Physician Involved? 2. Is There a Designated Health Service ( DHS )) Involved?

V. WHAT IS STARK? 3. Is There a Referral? 4. Is There a Financial Relationship? 5. Does the Financial Relationship Qualify as One of the Specified Exceptions Under Stark?

V. WHAT IS STARK? E. What Exceptions Are Available for Ownership Interests? 1. Publicly Traded Securities. 2. Rural Exceptions.

V. WHAT IS STARK? F. What Exceptions are Available for Compensation Arrangements? 1. Bona Fide Employment Relationships. 2. Personal Services Arrangements. 3. Non-Monetary Compensation. 4. Fair Market Value Compensation ( Catch All Exception ). 5. Space and Equipment Leases.

V. WHAT IS STARK? G. What are the Stark Compliance Requirements for Medical Director Agreements? 1. Bona Fide Employment. 2. Personal Services Agreement. 3. Fair Market Value Exception.

V. WHAT IS STARK? H. How is Fair Market Value Determined? I. What Sanctions Arise from Violation of Stark? 1. Claim Denial. 2. Refund. 3. Civil Monetary Penalties. 4. Exclusion. 5. False Claims Act. 6. Self Disclosure Protocol.

VI. WHAT IS THE FEDERAL ANTI-KICKBACK STATUTE AND HOW IS IT DISTINGUISHED FROM STARK? A. How is Medicare Anti-Kickback Statute Applied? 1. The role of the OIG. 2. Criminal Sanctions. 3. Intent. 4. The Anti-Kickback Statute is Not Limited to Physicians. 5. Civil Monetary Penalties. 6. Direct Link to False Claims Act.

VI. WHAT IS THE FEDERAL ANTI-KICKBACK STATUTE AND HOW IS IT DISTINGUISHED FROM STARK? B. Safe Harbors. 1. Small Investment Interests. 2. Investments in Medically Underserved Areas (MUAs). 3. Space Rental. 4. Equipment Rental. 5. Personal Services and Management Contracts. 6. Bona Fide Employment Relationships.

VII. WHAT CHANGES FOR HOME HEALTH AND HOSPICE WERE IMPOSED BY THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT? A. Overview of ACA Provisions. B. What did the ACA Impose? 1. Home Health Payment Reductions. 2. Home Health Physician Encounters. 3. Home Health Studies and Demonstration Projects. 4. Hospice Physician Encounters. 5. Future Hospice Payment Changes.

VIII. FEDERAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES: THE BIRTHPLACE OF CORPORATE COMPLIANCE A. Creation of the Sentencing Guidelines. B. Application of the Guidelines to Organizational Defendants. 1. Curing the Harm. 2. Divestiture of Assets. 3. Effect of Corporate Acts on Fines. 4. Possibility of Probation.

VIII. FEDERAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES: THE BIRTHPLACE OF CORPORATE COMPLIANCE C. Mitigation of Sentencing Through Implementation of a Corporate Compliance Plan. D. Changes to the Guidelines.

IX. CHARACTERISTICS OF CORPORATE COMPLIANCE PLANS A. Corporate Compliance Plans Are Mandatory. B. Self-Assessment and Detection of Fraud. C. Culture of Compliance. D. Protection and Avoidance of Sanctions.

X. STARTING THE COMPLIANCE PROCESS: THE REGULATORY ASSESSMENT A. Assessment. B. Review of Claims for Payment. C. Employee Interviews. D. Documents and Records Review. E. Attorney-Client Privilege. 1. Protection of Attorney-Client Communications.

X. STARTING THE COMPLIANCE PROCESS: THE REGULATORY ASSESSMENT 3. Limitations on Attorney-Client Privileges, Including the Crime- Fraud Exception. 4. Duties and Obligations to Disclose Certain Information and Penalties for Failure to Do So.

XI. REQUIRED ELEMENTS OF A CORPORATE COMPLIANCE PLAN A. Seven Requirements. 1. Standard of Conduct. 2. Responsibilities. 3. Delegation of Authority. 4. Communication. 5. Monitoring and Auditing. 6. Discipline. 7. Prevention. B. Formality of Compliance Plan Will Vary.

XII. IMPLEMENTATION OF A CORPORATE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM. A. Implementation Challenges. B. All Compliance Programs Shall Include Written Codes of Conduct. 1. Ethical Standards. 2. Employee Notification. 3. Description of Laws and False Claims Act Educational Requirements. 4. Distribution.

XII. IMPLEMENTATION OF A CORPORATE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM. C. Compliance Officers or Committee and Access to Upper Management. 1. Description of Duties. 2. Continuing Assessment. 3. Access to Management. 4. Appointment of Compliance Committee.

XII. IMPLEMENTATION OF A CORPORATE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM. D. Government Audits and Investigations. 1. Communications with Government Agents. 2. Reporting Outside Inquiries.

XII. IMPLEMENTATION OF A CORPORATE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM. E. Internal Mechanisms for Reporting Suspected Misconduct. 1. Anonymity. 2. Discipline.

XII. IMPLEMENTATION OF A CORPORATE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM. F. Corporate Document Retention System. 1. Retention System: Remember Arthur Anderson. 2. Cornerstone of Compliance.

XIII. WHAT HAPPENS IF A COMPLIANCE ISSUE IS DISCOVERED? A. The Rule of Two D sd B. ACA Disclosure Requirement C. Overpayment and Disclosure Protocols

XIV. THE ROLE OF BUSINESS ETHICS IN REGULATORY COMPLIANCE A. The Relationship Between Fraud, Compliance, and Ethics. 1. Relationship Between Compliance and Fraud. 2. Relationship Between Ethical Conduct and Compliance. 3. Avoidance of Allegations. B. Code of Ethics.